Open Access

Effect of liraglutide on atherosclerosis in patients with impaired glucose tolerance: A double‑blind, randomized controlled clinical trial

  • Authors:
    • Liping Sun
    • Yuhong Yuan
    • Yongmei Li
    • Xiaopang Rao
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: April 13, 2023     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2023.11948
  • Article Number: 249
  • Copyright: © Sun et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Glucagon‑like peptide‑1 receptor agonist liraglutide may have beneficial effects on atherosclerosis development in impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). To the best of our knowledge, however, little conclusive evidence from clinical trials has been presented. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of liraglutide on atherosclerosis progression in patients with IGT. The present study was a double‑blind, randomized controlled clinical trial. A total of 39 of patients aged 20‑75 years who were overweight or obese (BMI, 27‑40 kg/m2) and presented IGT were randomized to receive liraglutide (n=17) or lifestyle interventions (n=22) for 6 months. Serum glucose and insulin (INS) levels, lipid profile, inflammatory biomarkers and carotid intima‑media thickness (CIMT) were assessed at the start and end of each treatment. Side effects were also recorded. Liraglutide treatment was found to significantly improve glycaemia, including glycosylated hemoglobin, fasting and postprandial glucose as well as INS levels (all P<0.001). Liraglutide also significantly decreased serum total cholesterol and low‑density lipoprotein levels (all P<0.001). Furthermore, serum levels of inflammatory biomarkers, as well as CIMT, were decreased following liraglutide treatment compared with those in the lifestyle intervention group (all P<0.001). Kaplan‑Meier analysis showed that the risk of vasculopathy in the liraglutide group was lower than that in the lifestyle intervention group (log‑rank test; P=0.041). The monitoring of drug‑associated side effects indicated that the dose of liraglutide (0.6 to 1.2 mg/QD via subcutaneous injection) was safe and well‑tolerated. The present study suggested that liraglutide may slow atherosclerosis development and improve inflammatory status as well as intimal function in patients with IGT with few side effects. The trial was registered through the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR; trial registration no. ChiCTR2200063693; retrospectively registered) on Sep 14, 2022.

Introduction

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes imposes notable social and economic burdens globally (1). Before onset of type 2 diabetes, individuals can live in a high-risk state of prediabetes, defined as impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) (2). IGT is an intermediate category between normal glucose tolerance and overt diabetes (3), which can be identified using an oral glucose tolerance test. The number of individuals with IGT has been increasing for decades with an estimated 374 million individuals in 2017, equal to 7.7% of the worldwide population aged 18-99 years (1). Individuals with IGT are at high risk of progression to type 2 diabetes (4), cardiovascular disease (5) and mortality (6).

Previous clinical trials have suggested that lifestyle interventions, including diet and exercise, can effectively slow the progression from IGT to type 2 diabetes (7-9). However, not all individuals with prediabetes achieve the recommended lifestyle modifications and may instead need pharmacotherapy. Antidiabetic drugs, such as metformin, acarbose, rosiglitazone, pioglitazone and liraglutide, have proven beneficial for the prevention of diabetes and underlying prediabetes (8,10-13). Liraglutide is a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist that stimulates insulin (INS) secretion, inhibits glucagon secretion and lowers plasma glucose levels after binding to the GLP-1 receptor (14). Liraglutide not only protects and restores pancreatic β-cell activity but is also involved in atherosclerosis prevention in patients with diabetes (15-17). For individuals with IGT, preclinical studies have demonstrated that liraglutide may have beneficial effects on atherosclerosis and potentially reduce the risk for cardiovascular disease (18,19). However, to the best of our knowledge, little conclusive evidence from clinical trials has been shown. The present study was therefore performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of liraglutide for prevention of atherosclerosis progression in patients with IGT.

Materials and methods

Participants

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Chengyang People's Hospital in Qingdao (China; approval no. CYQRMYY2019-09-11) and performed following the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. All study participants provided written informed consent. A total of 39 patients (26 female and 13 male) aged 20-75 years who were overweight or obese (BMI, 27-40 kg/m2) and diagnosed with IGT from October 2019 to September 2021 in Chengyang People's Hospital were included in the present study. Glucose tolerance status was defined using an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) according to the World Health Organization criteria (20). The exclusion criteria were as follows: i) Type 1 or 2 diabetes; ii) lower limb ischemia; iii) treatment with hypoglycemic drugs or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor antagonist during the trial; iv) chronic disease or health conditions; v) acute illness (such as infection) and vi) pregnancy or lactation.

The patient baseline clinical characteristics, including age, sex, height, weight, BMI, waist circumference (WC), hip circumference (HC), systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), were recorded.

Study design

The study period was October 2009 to September 2021. Participants were randomized to receive either liraglutide (n=17) or lifestyle interventions (n=22) for 6 months. Liraglutide was injected subcutaneously daily before breakfast. The dose was escalated weekly from 0.6 to 1.2 mg (increments, 0.1 mg per week). Lifestyle interventions included dietary intervention and physical activity. The dietary intervention involved advice and counseling to develop an individual plan for behavioral change aiming to achieve the following: Total dietary energy intake >50% from carbohydrates; decreased total and saturated fat intake with <30% total dietary energy from fat intake; increased fiber intake and weight loss to achieve BMI <25 kg/m2 (21,22). The physical activity intervention was designed to encourage participation in increased physical activity equivalent to 30 min of moderate aerobic physical activity/day. Both participants and study administrators (physicians, nurses, dietitians and coordinators) were blinded to the treatment assignment.

OGTT

Following 14 h of overnight fasting, all subjects were admitted to the Chengyang People's Hospital in Qingdao (China) between 8:00 and 9:00 a.m. After resting for 30 min, venous blood (2 ml) was drawn to measure fasting glucose and INS levels. A 75-g oral glucose load was administered over a 1 min period. Blood draws for glucose and analysis of INS levels were performed 60 and 120 min after administration of the glucose load. Serum INS was measured using the Mercodia Insulin ELISA kit (cat. no. 10-1113-01; Mercodia AB) (23).

Biochemical analysis

Blood samples were collected after 14 h overnight fasting at baseline and after 4 months of each treatment. Serum levels of triglyceride (TG) and total cholesterol (TC) were measured using an enzymatic method (Roche Diagnostics). The phosphotungstic acid-Mg2+ method was used to determine high-density lipoprotein (HDL) concentrations. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) was estimated in samples with a triglyceride level <400 mg/dl, using the modified Friedewald formula (24).

The glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels were measured through boronate-affinity high-performance liquid chromatography (Premier Hb9210™; Trinity Biotech, Inc.). The analytical column contains aminophenylboronic acid bonded to a porous polymer support (gel) and pumps transfer reagents and patient samples through the analytical column. Modules of the instruments are as follows: SPD 20A UV detector, DGU-20A5 degasser, SIL-20A HT autosampler, LC-20AT pump (liquid chromatograph) and CTO-IOAS column oven. Briefly, to a 5 µl sample, a 1,250 µl hemolysis reagent was added and the mixture was left for 30 min at 37˚C. The precipitated protein was removed by centrifugation at 10,000 x g at 4˚C for 2 min. A total of 20 µl of the supernatant was injected into the chromatographic system. Separation of HbA1c was achieved with a 35x4.6 mm cation exchanger column (ImmuChrom GmbH) with a particle size of 3 µm at a flow rate of 1.5 ml/min. The areas of peaks detected by UV detector (415 nm) were used for quantification. HbA1c levels were expressed as %. To minimize inter-batch analytical variation, all samples from any given volunteer were assayed in a single batch. Each sample from one subject was assayed in duplicate, using the analytical system in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. The same lots of calibrators, reagent lot and quality-control materials were used throughout, and analyses were performed by a single analyst.

C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured using the immunoturbidimetric method (CRPL3 assay; Roche Diagnostics) on a Cobas 702 module (Roche Diagnostics). TNF-α (cat. no. YSRIBIO-3736), IL-1β (cat. no. YSRIBIO-3292), IL-2α (cat. no. YSRIBIO-4666) and IL-6 (cat. no. YSRIBIO-4610) levels were measured using ELISA kits obtained from Shanghai Yansheng Biochemical Reagents Co., Ltd. The ELISA procedure was performed according to the manufacturer' instructions. White blood cell (WBC) count analysis was performed using using the Sysmex XE 2100 automated hematology system (Sysmex Corporation) (25).

Ultrasonography of carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT)

B-mode real-time ultrasound was performed at baseline and after 4 months of treatment to evaluate arterial wall thickness in the carotid arteries as a surrogate marker of subclinical atherosclerosis (26). All examinations were performed by a single examiner in a blinded manner using the same ultrasound machine (Acuson Antares™ ultrasound system, premium edition; Siemens Healthineers), without access to previous scans when follow-up studies were performed. The ultrasound examination was performed in a standardized manner and specific sonographic images were obtained for comparison.

Patients were examined in the supine position and each carotid wall or segment was evaluated to identify IMT, as previously reported (27). Each scan of the common carotid artery began just above the clavicle and the transducer was moved to the carotid bifurcation and along the internal carotid artery. In total, three segments were identified and measured in anterior and posterior planes on each side: i) Distal 1.0 cm of the common carotid artery proximal to the bifurcation; ii) the bifurcation and iii) proximal 1.0 cm of the internal carotid artery. At each of these sites, IMT was determined, defined as the distance between the echogenic line representing the intimal blood interface and the outer echogenic line representing the adventitial junction. IMT <0.9 mm was defined as normal; 0.9 mm≤ IMT <1.3 mm was defined as intimal medial thickness; and IMT ≥1.3 mm was defined as plaque. In addition, electrocardiogram revealed the general condition of the coronary arteries. ST segment or T wave change on electrocardiogram was considered as myocardial ischemia.

Follow-up

The primary endpoint was occurrence of atherosclerosis in macrovasculature, as well as in peripheral and visceral vessels. Patients were followed up once every 3 months, with a total follow-up duration of 6 months. The patient clinical profile and laboratory measurements were recorded at each visit. The side effects during the intervention were monitored to assess the tolerance and safety of each treatment.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 22.0 (IBM Corp.). The normality of distribution of the variables data was assessed using Shapiro-Wilk test. Data normally distributed are presented as mean ± standard deviation and tested using Student's t test. If the data were skewed, the Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to assess differences in changes before and after treatment between the two groups. Categorical data was compared using χ2 test or Fisher's exact probability method. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and a log-rank test were used to compare the risk of vascular disease following treatment between the two groups. A two-tailed P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Clinical characteristics of enrolled patients

Individuals randomized to receive liraglutide or lifestyle intervention had similar baseline characteristics including sex (P=0.819), age (P=0.322), BMI (P=0.596), WC (P=0.734), HC (P=0.292), DBP (P=0.795) and SBP (P=0.547) (Table I). BMI, WC and HC after liraglutide treatment were lower than those after lifestyle intervention (all P<0.001). DBP and SBP levels did not show any statistically significant difference between the treatment arms (all P>0.05).

Table I

Clinical characteristics of participants before and after treatment.

Table I

Clinical characteristics of participants before and after treatment.

 Lifestyle intervention (n=22)Liraglutide (n=17) 
CharacteristicPre-treatmentPost-treatmentΔ changePre-treatmentPost-treatmentΔ change P-valuea P-valueb
Sex, female, n (%)15 (68.18)15 (68.18)NA11 (64.71)11 (64.71)NA0.819NA
Mean age, years48.91±10.1249.27±10.010.41±0.5044.92±14.6945.35±14.750.41±0.510.3221.000
BMI, kg/m226.21±4.3326.15±3.21-0.06±0.0826.84±2.4723.38±3.71-3.46±0.670.596<0.001
Waist circumference, cm87.12±5.7486.47±5.36-0.65±0.2886.52±4.9882.31±5.48-4.21±0.750.734<0.001
Hip circumference, cm102.86±5.8899.98±5.49-2.88±0.41101.02±4.5190.03±4.07-10.99±1.420.292<0.001
Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg120.52±18.39119.01±17.16-1.51±0.74118.86±21.13117.26±20.19-1.60±0.550.7950.677
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg69.47±11.1369.22±11.64-0.25±0.2267.33±10.5767.02±11.16-0.31±0.340.5470.508

[i] NA, not applicable.

[ii] aComparing pre-treatment values between the two groups.

[iii] bComparing Δ change between the two groups.

Side effects in liraglutide treatment group and lifestyle intervention group

Treatment-associated side effects are shown in Table SI. The most common side effect of liraglutide was nausea (n=4; 23.5%). There was no significant difference in side effects between liraglutide treatment and lifestyle intervention.

Effect of liraglutide treatment on serum glucose and INS levels

Liraglutide treatment could induce a greater reduction in HbA1c compared with lifestyle intervention (P<0.001; Table II). Similar trends were also observed for fasting blood glucose, fasting INS, 2 h postprandial blood glucose and 2 h postprandial INS between liraglutide treatment and lifestyle intervention (all P<0.001; Table II).

Table II

Dynamic changes of serum HbA1c, glucose and insulin before and after treatment.

Table II

Dynamic changes of serum HbA1c, glucose and insulin before and after treatment.

 Lifestyle intervention (n=22)Liraglutide (n=17) 
ParameterPre-treatmentPost-treatmentΔ changePre-treatmentPost-treatmentΔ change P-valuea
HbA1c, %5.91±0.335.89±0.29-0.02±0.025.98±0.425.16±0.39-0.82±0.07<0.001
Fasting blood glucose, mmol/l6.02±1.486.04±1.850.01±0.025.97±1.285.75±1.21-0.22±0.06<0.001
Fasting insulin, mu/l15. 42±3.5714. 94±4.39-0.48±0.0615.77±2.948.86±3.36-6.91±0.42<0.001
2 h postprandial blood glucose, mmol/l9.26±1.198.72±1.60-0.54±0.049.33±1.466.84±1.19-2.49±0.27<0.001
2 h insulin, mU/l92.48±21.0290.7±26.89-1.78±0.8391.38±14.6847.94±19.98-43.44±5.36<0.001

[i] aComparing Δ change between the two groups. HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin.

Effect of liraglutide treatment on lipid profile

Liraglutide treatment significantly decreased TC and LDL levels compared with lifestyle intervention (all P<0.001; Table III). However, no changes in TG and HDL were observed.

Table III

Dynamic changes of lipid profile before and after treatment.

Table III

Dynamic changes of lipid profile before and after treatment.

 Lifestyle intervention (n=22)Liraglutide (n=17) 
ParameterPre-treatmentPost-treatmentΔ changePre-treatmentPost-treatmentΔ change P-valuea
Triglyceride, mmol/l1.29±0.881.24±0.45-0.05±0.041.27±0.531.21±0.36-0.06±0.060.537
Total cholesterol, mmol/l5.59±1.045.51±1.14-0.07±0.085.53±0.984.42±0.95-1.11±0.19<0.001
High-density lipoprotein, mmol/l1.50±0.181.48±0.28-0.02±0.031.48±0.261.45±0.34-0.03±0.050.443
Low-density lipoprotein, mmol/l2.76±1.192.68±1.58-0.08±0.249.32±1.466.84±1.19-2.49±0.51<0.001

[i] aP-value was calculated by comparing Δ change.

Effect of liraglutide treatment on inflammatory markers

Liraglutide treatment significantly decreased levels of WBC, CRP, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-2α and IL-6 compared with lifestyle intervention (all P<0.001; Table IV).

Table IV

Dynamic changes of inflammatory markers before and after treatment.

Table IV

Dynamic changes of inflammatory markers before and after treatment.

 Lifestyle intervention (n=22)Liraglutide (n=17) 
ParameterPre-treatmentPost-treatmentΔ changePre-treatmentPost-treatmentΔ change P-valuea
White blood cell, x109/l6.94±0.546.95±0.380.01±0.016.94±0.555.17±0.39-1.77±0.21<0.001
C-reactive protein, mg/l5.39±1.055.43±0.810.04±0.035.38±0.972.41±0.51-2.97±0.35<0.001
TNF-α, ng/l25.65±3.8624.18±5.25-1.47±0.4226.53±3.5714.01±3.97-12.53±0.73<0.001
IL-1β, ng/l54.56±7.7851.97±12.03-2.59±4.6854.14±6.2930.84±7.41-23.29±8.71<0.001
IL-2α, ng/l2.89±0.302.78±0.54-0.11±0.072.82±0.360.87±0.24-1.96±0.42<0.001
IL-6, ng/l15.37±2.4915.13±2.91-0.24±0.2215.69±2.246.65±1.51-9.04±0.72<0.001

[i] aComparing Δ change between the two groups.

Effect of liraglutide treatment on the development of atherosclerosis

The levels of CIMT decreased significantly in patients treated with liraglutide compared with lifestyle intervention (P<0.001; Table V). Although the lifestyle intervention group exhibited a higher incidence of atherosclerosis in coronary and peripheral arteries compared with that in the liraglutide treatment group, no significant difference was observed (all P>0.05; Table SII). Based on the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the incidence of vascular disease in the liraglutide group was significantly lower than that in the lifestyle intervention group (log-rank test P=0.041; Fig. 1).

Table V

Dynamic changes of CIMT before and after treatment.

Table V

Dynamic changes of CIMT before and after treatment.

 Lifestyle intervention (n=22)Liraglutide (n=17) 
ParameterPre-treatmentPost-treatmentΔ changePre-treatmentPost-treatmentΔ change P-valuea
CIMT, mm0.91±0.230.92±0.180.01±0.010.91±0.250.70±0.16-0.21±0.07<0.001

[i] aP-value was calculated by comparing Δ change between the two groups. CIMT, carotid intima-media thickness.

Discussion

In the present study, the efficacy and safety of liraglutide were evaluated for prevention of atherosclerotic development in patients with IGT. A greater decrease in CIMT was observed in patients treated with liraglutide compared with those who received lifestyle interventions. Furthermore, hematological and biochemical examination indicated that liraglutide treatment ameliorated the lipid profile and inflammation in patients with IGT.

Cardiovascular disease causes disability and death in patients with diabetes. La Sala et al (28) highlighted in a review that the appearance of atherosclerosis may start as early as the onset of diabetes. Moreover, a systematic review and meta-analysis highlighted a series of large-scale epidemiological studies that showed that early manifestation of diabetes, especially IGT, aggravates atherosclerosis and increase the risk of developing cardiovascular diseases (5,29-31). IGT represents an intermediate metabolic state between normal glucose homeostasis and hyperglycemia, which has been suggested as a strong predictor of type 2 diabetes and macrovascular disease (4,5). Therefore, interventions should be performed during the early stage of diabetes to decrease the occurrence of cardiac complications.

IGT has an insidious onset and its non-specific clinical findings may not be instantly discernible. With the effect of behavior and lifestyle on blood glucose levels, 30% of patients with IGT eventually develop diabetes (4). The Da Qing Diabetes Prevention Outcome Study was the first global study to report that lifestyle changes could reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with IGT (32). However, changing lifestyle required long-term adherence and patients often exhibit poor compliance (33). Therefore, for those who cannot adhere to a healthy lifestyle for a long period or have a poor response to lifestyle interventions, therapeutic interventions should be considered. At present, disputes remain regarding the optimum regimens for pre-diabetes. The DPP (metformin) (8), DREAM (INS sensitizer) (11) and STOP-NIDDM (acarbose) (34) studies have shown that medications notably decrease the risk of diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

An ideal option for IGT treatment may be a drug that can lower the postprandial blood glucose levels and restore the first phase of INS secretion with no serious side effects (such as gastrointestinal reaction, weight gain and hypoglycemia). With the gradual application of novel hypoglycemic drugs (such as GLP-1 receptor agonists) in clinical practice, liraglutide has also attracted attention (35-37). Liraglutide has 97% amino acid sequence homologous to native human GLP-1, which preserves the biological activity of native GLP-1 and is resistant to degradation (37). Furthermore, liraglutide activates the GLP-1 receptor on the surface of pancreatic cells, increases cyclic adenosine monophosphate in the cells, promotes INS release, inhibits glucagon secretion and improves the sensitivity of peripheral tissue to INS (38,39).

By binding to the GLP-1 receptor in the gastrointestinal tract, liraglutide could directly inhibit gastric emptying, slowing gastrointestinal peristalsis and gastric juice secretion (37). It may also interfere with absorption of nutrients and enable weight loss (40). In vivo studies have showed that the GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide could improve the cell ultrastructure in IGT rats, inhibit excessive proliferation of α islet cells, decrease the excessive synthesis of glucagon, improve the structure of pancreatic islets, alleviate INS resistance and delay the development of glucose metabolism disorder (18,41). In the present study, metabolic markers such as TC and LDL for patients with IGT were significantly improved following treatment with liraglutide, suggesting that liraglutide may serve as a therapeutic strategy for IGT management.

Previous studies have found that the levels of CIMT are significantly increased in the early stages of IGT (42,43). IGT is a risk factor for carotid atherosclerosis (44,45). The European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension guidelines recommend CIMT >0.9 mm as a marker of target organ injury in atherosclerosis (46). Preclinical studies have shown that the gradual emergence of atherosclerotic plaques is associated with oxidative stress injury, macrophage-mediated phagocytosis and formation of foam cells (47,48). Furthermore, exacerbated INS resistance and production of proinflammatory cytokines also promote development of atherosclerosis. Existing evidence suggests that liraglutide may inhibit activation of NF-κB, which serves as an essential inflammatory biomarker for regulating the balance of the proinflammatory-anti-inflammatory system (49,50). Zhang et al (51) demonstrated that liraglutide protects cardiomyocytes from IL-1β-induced metabolic disturbance and mitochondrial dysfunction. The present study showed that inflammatory indicators and CIMT were significantly decreased following treatment with liraglutide, suggesting that GLP-1 receptor agonist improved the inflammatory response in patients with IGT and slowed the occurrence of atherosclerosis.

The present study has certain limitations. First, the sample size was relatively small. Therefore, a larger prospective study is required to verify the results. Secondly, the diet type and schedule were not controlled for lifestyle interventions, which may have led to differences in outcomes between patients. Thirdly, the follow-up duration was short. Since vascular disease has a slow and insidious onset, statistical significance may have been achieved for several outcomes with a longer follow-up period and more events. In addition, only blood tests and CIMT were performed to evaluate atherosclerotic development. Although several indices (such as aortic plaque burden) have also been considered as key indicators of atherosclerosis in preclinical research (52), their diagnostic value remains to be validated in clinical studies. Other indices, such as ankle-brachial index (53) and arterial pulse wave velocity (54), are also key indicators of atherosclerotic progression. However, these indices were not employed in the present study due to low patient compliance. These indices should be included in a future prospective study.

In conclusion, GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide may slow atherosclerosis development and improve the inflammatory status and intimal function in patients with IGT with few side effects.

Supplementary Material

Side effects.
Location of atherosclerosis.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding: The present study was supported by the Qingdao Medical Research Guidance Plan (grant no. 2015-WJZD142).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

XR conceived and designed the study and revised the manuscript. LS contributed to data collection and analysis and drafted the manuscript. YY and YL performed data analysis and manuscript revision. XR and LS confirmed the authenticity of all the raw data. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were performed following the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee, as well as the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Chengyang People's Hospital in Qingdao (approval no. CYQRMYY2019-09-11). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, Malanda B, Karuranga S, Unwin N, Colagiuri S, Guariguata L, Motala AA, Ogurtsova K, et al: Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 157(107843)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

de Vegt F, Dekker JM, Jager A, Hienkens E, Kostense PJ, Stehouwer CDA, Nijpels G, Bouter LM and Heine RJ: Relation of impaired fasting and postload glucose with incident type 2 diabetes in a Dutch population: The Hoorn Study. JAMA. 285:2109–2113. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Harris MI: Impaired glucose tolerance in the U.S. population. Diabetes Care. 12:464–474. 1989.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Edelstein SL, Knowler WC, Bain RP, Andres R, Barrett-Connor EL, Dowse GK, Haffner SM, Pettitt DJ, Sorkin JD, Muller DC, et al: Predictors of progression from impaired glucose tolerance to NIDDM: An analysis of six prospective studies. Diabetes. 46:701–710. 1997.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Huang Y, Cai X, Mai W, Li M and Hu Y: Association between prediabetes and risk of cardiovascular disease and all cause mortality: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 355(i5953)2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Gong Q, Zhang P, Wang J, An Y, Gregg EW, Li H, Zhang B, Shuai Y, Yang W, Chen Y, et al: Changes in mortality in people with IGT before and after the onset of diabetes during the 23-year follow-up of the Da Qing Diabetes Prevention Study. Diabetes Care. 39:1550–1555. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Tuomilehto J, Lindström J, Eriksson JG, Valle TT, Hämäläinen H, Ilanne-Parikka P, Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi S, Laakso M, Louheranta A, Rastas M, et al: Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med. 344:1343–1350. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Lachin JM, Walker EA and Nathan DM: Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. 346:393–403. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Mary S, Mukesh B, Bhaskar AD and Vijay V: Indian Diabetes Prevention Programme (IDPP). The Indian Diabetes Prevention Programme shows that lifestyle modification and metformin prevent type 2 diabetes in Asian Indian subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IDPP-1). Diabetologia. 49:289–297. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Holman RR, Coleman RL, Chan JCN, Chiasson JL, Feng H, Ge J, Gerstein HC, Gray R, Huo Y, Lang Z, et al: Effects of acarbose on cardiovascular and diabetes outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease and impaired glucose tolerance (ACE): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 5:877–886. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

DREAM (Diabetes REduction Assessment with ramipril and rosiglitazone Medication) Trial Investigators. Gerstein HC, Yusuf S, Bosch J, Pogue J, Sheridan P, Dinccag N, Hanefeld M, Hoogwerf B, Laakso M, et al: Effect of rosiglitazone on the frequency of diabetes in patients with impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 368:1096–1105. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

DeFronzo RA, Tripathy D, Schwenke DC, Banerji M, Bray GA, Buchanan TA, Clement SC, Henry RR, Hodis HN, Kitabchi AE, et al: Pioglitazone for diabetes prevention in impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med. 364:1104–1115. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Pi-Sunyer X, Astrup A, Fujioka K, Greenway F, Halpern A, Krempf M, Lau DC, le Roux CW, Violante Ortiz R, Jensen CB, et al: A randomized, controlled trial of 3.0 mg of liraglutide in weight management. N Engl J Med. 373:11–22. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Blonde L and Russell-Jones D: The safety and efficacy of liraglutide with or without oral antidiabetic drug therapy in type 2 diabetes: An overview of the LEAD 1-5 studies. Diabetes Obes Metab. 11 (Suppl 3):S26–S34. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Rizzo M, Nikolic D, Patti AM, Mannina C, Montalto G, McAdams BS, Rizvi AA and Cosentino F: GLP-1 receptor agonists and reduction of cardiometabolic risk: Potential underlying mechanisms. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 1864:2814–2821. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Vergès B and Charbonnel B: After the LEADER trial and SUSTAIN-6, how do we explain the cardiovascular benefits of some GLP-1 receptor agonists? Diabetes Metab. 43 (Suppl 1):2S3–2S12. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Nauck MA, Quast DR, Wefers J and Meier JJ: GLP-1 receptor agonists in the treatment of type 2 diabetes-state-of-the-art. Mol Metab. 46(101102)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Noyan-Ashraf MH, Shikatani EA, Schuiki I, Mukovozov I, Wu J, Li RK, Volchuk A, Robinson LA, Billia F, Drucker DJ and Husain M: A glucagon-like peptide-1 analog reverses the molecular pathology and cardiac dysfunction of a mouse model of obesity. Circulation. 127:74–85. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Simanenkova A, Minasian S, Karonova T, Vlasov T, Timkina N, Shpilevaya O, Khalzova A, Shimshilashvili A, Timofeeva V, Samsonov D, et al: Comparative evaluation of metformin and liraglutide cardioprotective effect in rats with impaired glucose tolerance. Sci Rep. 11(6700)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Shareef M, Saleh L, van den Meiracker AH and Visser W: The impact of implementing the WHO-2013 criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus on its prevalence and pregnancy outcomes: A comparison of the WHO-1999 and WHO-2013 diagnostic thresholds. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 246:14–18. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Penn L, White M, Oldroyd J, Walker M, Alberti KG and Mathers JC: Prevention of type 2 diabetes in adults with impaired glucose tolerance: The European Diabetes Prevention RCT in Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. BMC Public Health. 9(342)2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Mann J, Lean M, Toeller M, Slama G, Uusitupa M and Vessby B: Recommendations for the nutritional management of patients with diabetes mellitus. Eur J Clin Nutr. 54:353–355. 2000.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Lee MY, Fraser JD, Chapman MJ, Sundararajan K, Umapathysivam MM, Summers MJ, Zaknic AV, Rayner CK, Meier JJ, Horowitz M and Deane AM: The effect of exogenous glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide in combination with glucagon-like peptide-1 on glycemia in the critically ill. Diabetes Care. 36:3333–3336. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

DeLong DM, DeLong ER, Wood PD, Lippel K and Rifkind BM: A comparison of methods for the estimation of plasma low- and very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: The Lipid Research Clinics Prevalence Study. JAMA. 256:2372–2377. 1986.PubMed/NCBI

25 

Ruzicka K, Veitl M, Thalhammer-Scherrer R and Schwarzinger I: The new hematology analyzer Sysmex XE-2100: Performance evaluation of a novel white blood cell differential technology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 125:391–396. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Rizzo M, Chandalia M, Patti AM, Di Bartolo V, Rizvi AA, Montalto G and Abate N: Liraglutide decreases carotid intima-media thickness in patients with type 2 diabetes: 8-month prospective pilot study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 13(49)2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Corrado E, Rizzo M, Tantillo R, Muratori I, Bonura F, Vitale G and Novo S: Markers of inflammation and infection influence the outcome of patients with baseline asymptomatic carotid lesions: A 5-year follow-up study. Stroke. 37:482–486. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

28 

La Sala L, Prattichizzo F and Ceriello A: The link between diabetes and atherosclerosis. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 26:15–24. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Pankow JS, Kwan DK, Duncan BB, Schmidt MI, Couper DJ, Golden S and Ballantyne CM: Cardiometabolic risk in impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Diabetes Care. 30:325–331. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

30 

Magliano DJ, Soderberg S, Zimmet PZ, Cartensen B, Balkau B, Pauvaday V, Kowlessur S, Tuomilehto J, Alberti KG and Shaw JE: Mortality, all-cause and cardiovascular disease, over 15 years in multiethnic mauritius: Impact of diabetes and intermediate forms of glucose tolerance. Diabetes Care. 33:1983–1989. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Barr EL, Zimmet PZ, Welborn TA, Jolley D, Magliano DJ, Dunstan DW, Cameron AJ, Dwyer T, Taylor HR, Tonkin AM, et al: Risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in individuals with diabetes mellitus, impaired fasting glucose, and impaired glucose tolerance: The Australian Diabetes, Obesity, and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab). Circulation. 116:151–157. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Gong Q, Zhang P, Wang J, Ma J, An Y, Chen Y, Zhang B, Feng X, Li H, Chen X, et al: Morbidity and mortality after lifestyle intervention for people with impaired glucose tolerance: 30-year results of the Da Qing Diabetes Prevention Outcome Study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 7:452–461. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Schuler G, Adams V and Goto Y: Role of exercise in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: Results, mechanisms, and new perspectives. Eur Heart J. 34:1790–1799. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

34 

Chiasson JL, Josse RG, Gomis R, Hanefeld M, Karasik A and Laakso M: Acarbose for prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus: The STOP-NIDDM randomised trial. Lancet. 359:2072–2077. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

35 

Frías JP, Davies MJ, Rosenstock J, Pérez Manghi FC, Fernández Landó L, Bergman BK, Liu B, Cui X and Brown K: SURPASS-2 Investigators. Tirzepatide versus semaglutide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 385:503–515. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

36 

GRADE Study Research Group. Nathan DM, Lachin JM, Bebu I, Burch HB, Buse JB, Cherrington AL, Fortmann SP, Green JB, Kahn SE, et al: Glycemia reduction in type 2 diabetes microvascular and cardiovascular outcomes. N Engl J Med. 387:1075–1088. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

37 

Sisson EM: Liraglutide: Clinical pharmacology and considerations for therapy. Pharmacotherapy. 31:896–911. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

38 

Knudsen LB and Lau J: The discovery and development of liraglutide and semaglutide. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 10(155)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

39 

Gallwitz B: Glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Drugs. 71:1675–1688. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

40 

Lazzaroni E, Ben Nasr M, Loretelli C, Pastore I, Plebani L, Lunati ME, Vallone L, Bolla AM, Rossi A, Montefusco L, et al: Anti-diabetic drugs and weight loss in patients with type 2 diabetes. Pharmacol Res. 171(105782)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

41 

Schwasinger-Schmidt T, Robbins DC, Williams SJ, Novikova L and Stehno-Bittel L: Long-term liraglutide treatment is associated with increased insulin content and secretion in beta-cells, and a loss of alpha-cells in ZDF rats. Pharmacol Res. 76:58–66. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

42 

Brohall G, Oden A and Fagerberg B: Carotid artery intima-media thickness in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance: A systematic review. Diabet Med. 23:609–616. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

43 

Henry RMA, Kostense PJ, Dekker JM, Nijpels G, Heine RJ, Kamp O, Bouter LM and Stehouwer CDA: Carotid arterial remodeling: A maladaptive phenomenon in type 2 diabetes but not in impaired glucose metabolism: The Hoorn study. Stroke. 35:671–676. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

44 

Henry RMA, Kostense PJ, Spijkerman AMW, Dekker JM, Nijpels G, Heine RJ, Kamp O, Westerhof N, Bouter LM and Stehouwer CD: Hoorn Study. Arterial stiffness increases with deteriorating glucose tolerance status. Circulation. 107:2089–2095. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

45 

Bonora E, Kiechl S, Oberhollenzer F, Egger G, Bonadonna RC, Muggeo M and Willeit J: Impaired glucose tolerance, Type II diabetes mellitus and carotid atherosclerosis: Prospective results from the Bruneck Study. Diabetologia. 43:156–164. 2000.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

46 

Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M, Clement DL, Coca A, de Simone G, Dominiczak A, et al: 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 39:3021–3104. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

47 

Munzel T, Gori T, Bruno RM and Taddei S: Is oxidative stress a therapeutic target in cardiovascular disease? Eur Heart J. 31:2741–2748. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

48 

Tabas I and Bornfeldt KE: Macrophage phenotype and function in different stages of atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 118:653–667. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

49 

Hattori Y, Jojima T, Tomizawa A, Satoh H, Hattori S, Kasai K and Hayashi T: A glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue, liraglutide, upregulates nitric oxide production and exerts anti-inflammatory action in endothelial cells. Diabetologia. 53:2256–2263. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

50 

Shiraki A, Oyama J, Komoda H, Asaka M, Komatsu A, Sakuma M, Kodama K, Sakamoto Y, Kotooka N, Hirase T and Node K: The glucagon-like peptide 1 analog liraglutide reduces TNF-α-induced oxidative stress and inflammation in endothelial cells. Atherosclerosis. 221:375–382. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

51 

Zhang L, Tian J, Diao S, Zhang G, Xiao M and Chang D: GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide protects cardiomyocytes from IL-1β-induced metabolic disturbance and mitochondrial dysfunction. Chem Biol Interact. 332(109252)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

52 

Chow BS, Koulis C, Krishnaswamy P, Steckelings UM, Unger T, Cooper ME, Jandeleit-Dahm KA and Allen TJ: The angiotensin II type 2 receptor agonist Compound 21 is protective in experimental diabetes-associated atherosclerosis. Diabetologia. 59:1778–1790. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

53 

Yeboah J, Young R, McClelland RL, Delaney JC, Polonsky TS, Dawood FZ, Blaha MJ, Miedema MD, Sibley CT, Carr JJ, et al: Utility of nontraditional risk markers in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk assessment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 67:139–147. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

54 

Aatola H, Hutri-Kahonen N, Juonala M, Viikari JS, Hulkkonen J, Laitinen T, Taittonen L, Lehtimaki T, Raitakari OT and Kahonen M: Lifetime risk factors and arterial pulse wave velocity in adulthood: the cardiovascular risk in young Finns study. Hypertension. 55:806–811. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

June-2023
Volume 25 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Sun L, Yuan Y, Li Y and Rao X: Effect of liraglutide on atherosclerosis in patients with impaired glucose tolerance: A double‑blind, randomized controlled clinical trial. Exp Ther Med 25: 249, 2023
APA
Sun, L., Yuan, Y., Li, Y., & Rao, X. (2023). Effect of liraglutide on atherosclerosis in patients with impaired glucose tolerance: A double‑blind, randomized controlled clinical trial. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 25, 249. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2023.11948
MLA
Sun, L., Yuan, Y., Li, Y., Rao, X."Effect of liraglutide on atherosclerosis in patients with impaired glucose tolerance: A double‑blind, randomized controlled clinical trial". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 25.6 (2023): 249.
Chicago
Sun, L., Yuan, Y., Li, Y., Rao, X."Effect of liraglutide on atherosclerosis in patients with impaired glucose tolerance: A double‑blind, randomized controlled clinical trial". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 25, no. 6 (2023): 249. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2023.11948