|
1
|
Dumonceau JM, Deprez PH, Jenssen C,
Iglesias-Garcia J, Larghi A, Vanbiervliet G, Aithal GP, Arcidiacono
PG, Bastos P, Carrara S, et al: Indications, results, and clinical
impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in
gastroenterology: European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy
(ESGE) clinical guideline-updated january. Endoscopy. 49:695–714.
2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
2
|
Polkowski M, Jenssen C, Kaye P, Carrara S,
Deprez P, Gines A, Fernández-Esparrach G, Eisendrath P, Aithal GP,
Arcidiacono P, et al: Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound
(EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European society of
gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) Technical guideline-march 2017.
Endoscopy. 49:989–1006. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
3
|
ASGE Standards of Practice Committee.
Eloubeidi MA, Decker GA, Chandrasekhara V, Chathadi KV, Early DS,
Evans JA, Fanelli RD, Fisher DA, Foley K, et al: The role of
endoscopy in the evaluation and management of patients with solid
pancreatic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 83:17–28.
2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
4
|
Wang KX, Ben QW, Jin ZD, Du YQ, Zou DW,
Liao Z and Li ZS: Assessment of morbidity and mortality associated
with EUS-guided FNA: A systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc.
73:283–290. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
5
|
Tan Y, Tang X, Huang J and Li R: Efficacy,
feasibility, and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle
biopsy for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions:
A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol.
56:e283–e292. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
6
|
Wiersema MJ, Wiersema LM, Khusro Q, Cramer
HM and Tao LC: Combined endosonography and fine-needle aspiration
cytology in the evaluation of gastrointestinal lesions.
Gastrointest Endosc. 40:199–206. 1994.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
7
|
Klapman JB, Logrono R, Dye CE and Waxman
I: Clinical impact of on-site cytopathology interpretation on
endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Am J
Gastroenterol. 98:1289–1294. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
8
|
Iglesias-Garcia J, Dominguez-Munoz JE,
Abdulkader I, Larino-Noia J, Eugenyeva E, Lozano-Leon A and
Forteza-Vila J: Influence of on-site cytopathology evaluation on
the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle
aspiration (EUS-FNA) of solid pancreatic masses. Am J
Gastroenterol. 106:1705–1710. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
9
|
Hébert-Magee S, Bae S, Varadarajulu S,
Ramesh J, Frost AR, Eloubeidi MA and Eltoum IA: The presence of a
cytopathologist increases the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic
ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology for pancreatic
adenocarcinoma: A meta-analysis. Cytopathology. 24:159–171.
2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
10
|
Masutani H, Okuwaki K, Kida M, Yoshida T,
Imaizumi H, Yamauchi H, Iwai T, Kaneko T, Hasegawa R, Miyata E, et
al: On-site stereomicroscope quality evaluations to estimate white
core cutoff lengths using EUS-FNA biopsy sampling with 22-gauge
needles. Gastrointest Endosc. 90:947–956. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
11
|
Iwashita T, Yasuda I, Mukai T, Doi S,
Nakashima M, Uemura S, Mabuchi M, Shimizu M, Hatano Y, Hara A and
Moriwaki H: Macroscopic on-site quality evaluation of biopsy
specimens to improve the diagnostic accuracy during EUS-guided FNA
using a 19-gauge needle for solid lesions: A single-center
prospective pilot study (MOSE study). Gastrointest Endosc.
81:177–185. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
12
|
Kaneko J, Ishiwatari H, Sasaki K, Yasuda
I, Takahashi K, Imura J, Iwashita T, Uemura S, Hatano Y, Miyazaki
T, et al: Macroscopic visible core length can predict the
histological sample quantity in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue
acquisition: Multicenter prospective study. Dig Endosc. 34:622–631.
2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
13
|
So H, Seo DW, Hwang JS, Ko SW, Oh D, Song
TJ, Park DH, Lee SK and Kim MH: Macroscopic on-site evaluation
after EUS-guided fine needle biopsy may replace rapid on-site
evaluation. Endosc Ultrasound. 10:111–115. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
14
|
Chong CCN, Lakhtakia S, Nguyen N, Hara K,
Chan WK, Puri R, Almadi MA, Ang TL, Kwek A, Yasuda I, et al:
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition with or without
macroscopic on-site evaluation: Randomized controlled trial.
Endoscopy. 52:856–863. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
15
|
Okuwaki K, Masutani H, Kida M, Yamauchi H,
Iwai T, Miyata E, Hasegawa R, Kaneko T, Imaizumi H, Watanabe M, et
al: Diagnostic efficacy of white core cutoff lengths obtained by
EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy using a novel 22G franseen biopsy
needle and sample isolation processing by stereomicroscopy for
subepithelial lesions. Endosc Ultrasound. 9:187–192.
2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
16
|
Kaneko J, Ishiwatari H, Sasaki K, Satoh T,
Sato J, Matsubayashi H, Yabuuchi Y, Kishida Y, Yoshida M, Ito S, et
al: Macroscopic on-site evaluation of biopsy specimens for accurate
pathological diagnosis during EUS-guided fine needle biopsy using
22-G Franseen needle. Endosc Ultrasound. 9:385–391. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
17
|
Ishiwatari H, Sato J, Fujie S, Sasaki K,
Kaneko J, Satoh T, Matsubayashi H, Kishida Y, Yoshida M, Ito S, et
al: Gross visual inspection by endosonographers during endoscopic
ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Pancreatology.
19:191–195. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
18
|
Stigliano S, Balassone V, Biasutto D,
Covotta F, Signoretti M and Di Matteo FM: Accuracy of visual
on-site evaluation (Vose) in predicting the adequacy of Eus-guided
fine needle biopsy: A single center prospective study.
Pancreatology. 21:312–317. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
19
|
Mangiavillano B, Frazzoni L, Togliani T,
Fabbri C, Tarantino I, De Luca L, Staiano T, Binda C, Signoretti M,
Eusebi LH, et al: Macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) of
specimens from solid lesions acquired during EUS-FNB: multicenter
study and comparison between needle gauges. Endosc Int Open.
9:E901–E906. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
20
|
Mangiavillano B, Crinò SF, Facciorusso A,
Di Matteo F, Barbera C, Larghi A, Rizzatti G, Carrara S, Spadaccini
M, Auriemma F, et al: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle
biopsy with or without macroscopic on-site evaluation: A randomized
controlled noninferiority trial. Endoscopy. 55:129–137.
2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
21
|
Collins BT, Murad FM, Wang JF and Bernadt
CT: Rapid on-site evaluation for endoscopic ultrasound-guided
fine-needle biopsy of the pancreas decreases the incidence of
repeat biopsy procedures. Cancer Cytopathol. 121:518–524.
2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
22
|
Wani S, Mullady D, Early DS, Rastogi A,
Collins B, Wang JF, Marshall C, Sams SB, Yen R, Rizeq M, et al: The
clinical impact of immediate on-site cytopathology evaluation
during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of
pancreatic masses: A prospective multicenter randomized controlled
trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 110:1429–1439. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
23
|
Matynia AP, Schmidt RL, Barraza G,
Layfield LJ, Siddiqui AA and Adler DG: Impact of rapid on-site
evaluation on the adequacy of endoscopic-ultrasound guided
fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: A systematic
review and meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 29:697–705.
2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
24
|
van Riet PA, Cahen DL, Poley JW and Bruno
MJ: Mapping international practice patterns in EUS-guided tissue
sampling: outcome of a global survey. Endosc Int Open. 4:E360–E370.
2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
25
|
Khan MA, Grimm IS, Ali B, Nollan R,
Tombazzi C, Ismail MK and Baron TH: A meta-analysis of endoscopic
ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration compared to endoscopic
ultrasound-fine-needle biopsy: Diagnostic yield and the value of
onsite cytopathological assessment. Endosc Int Open. 5:E363–E375.
2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
26
|
Hayashi T, Ishiwatari H, Yoshida M, Ono M,
Sato T, Miyanishi K, Sato Y, Kobune M, Takimoto R, Mitsuhashi T, et
al: Rapid on-site evaluation by endosonographer during endoscopic
ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic solid
masses. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 28:656–663. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
27
|
Mohan BP, Madhu D, Reddy N, Chara BS, Khan
SR, Garg G, Kassab LL, Muthusamy AK, Singh A, Chandan S, et al:
Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided fine
needle biopsy (FNB) by macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE): A
systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc.
96:909–917.e11. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
28
|
Nguyen YP, Maple JT, Zhang Q, Ylagan LR,
Zhai J, Kohlmeier C, Jonnalagadda S, Early DS, Edmundowicz SA and
Azar RR: Reliability of gross visual assessment of specimen
adequacy during EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic masses. Gastrointest
Endosc. 69:1264–1270. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
29
|
Vilmann P, Săftoiu A, Hollerbach S, Skov
BG, Linnemann D, Popescu CF, Wellmann A, Gorunescu F, Clementsen P,
Freund U, et al: Multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing
the performance of 22 gauge versus 25 gauge EUS-FNA needles in
solid masses. Scand J Gastroenterol. 48:877–883. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
30
|
Dougan SK: The pancreatic cancer
microenvironment. Cancer J. 23:321–325. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
31
|
Gkolfakis P, Crinò SF, Tziatzios G, Ramai
D, Papaefthymiou A, Papanikolaou IS, Triantafyllou K, Arvanitakis
M, Lisotti A, Fusaroli P, et al: Comparative diagnostic performance
of end-cutting fine-needle biopsy needles for endoscopic ultrasound
tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: A network
meta-analysis. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 95:1067–1077.e15.
2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
