Adverse perinatal outcomes complicated with gestational diabetes mellitus in preterm mothers and preterm infants

  • Authors:
    • Cai-Hong Zhang
    • Ping-Li Zhang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: July 18, 2023     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2023.12124
  • Article Number: 425
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The incidence rate of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in pregnancy is currently on the increase. GDM is associated with short and long‑term adverse outcomes for mothers, fetuses and newborns. The aim of the present study was to compare the incidence of adverse perinatal outcomes in women with and without GDM, in addition to comparing the morbidity and mortality rates of preterm infants born to women with and without GDM. A retrospective analysis of 640 preterm infants admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (Qingdao, China) between January 2019 and December 2020 was undertaken in the present study. According to mothers with or without GDM, the preterm infants were divided into the GDM group (n=217) and non‑GDM group (n=423). Women with GDM were older (P<0.01) and more of advanced maternal age (≥35 years) or multipara (P<0.001), tended to have an increased risk of gestational hypertension (P<0.05), placenta previa (P<0.005) and polycystic ovarian syndrome (P<0.05). In infants born preterm, those born from mothers with GDM were associated with an increased risk of respiratory distress syndrome (P<0.001) and sepsis (P<0.05). In addition, very low birth weight infants born to mothers with GDM were found to have an increased risk of hypoglycemia (P<0.05) and sepsis (P<0.05). In the logistic regression analysis, RDS was the only condition independently associated with GDM [adjusted odds ratio: 1.699 (95% confidence interval: 1.699‑1.699)]. However, there was no significant difference in the risk of mortality among the two groups. In conclusion, data from the present study suggested that GDM is associated with a higher risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnant women and a higher risk of adverse neonatal outcomes in infants born preterm.

Introduction

The incidence rate of diabetes during pregnancy is increasing annually; most of which are gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (1). GDM is a common complication of pregnancy, in which any degree of glucose intolerance is first recognized during pregnancy (2). According to the estimation made by the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) in 2021, GDM affected ~16.7% of all pregnancies worldwide and ~21 million newborns per year (3).

GDM is associated with short- and long-term adverse outcomes for mothers, fetuses and newborns (4). Preterm birth is a potential contributor to diabetes-associated morbidity. Previous studies have demonstrated that GDM by itself is a risk factor for premature birth (5-8).

Although the effect of various perinatal risk factors on the outcome of preterm infants have been studied previously, to the best of the authors' knowledge, an insufficient number of studies have focused on the outcome of preterm infants born to GDM mothers. In addition, the overall risk of morbidity and mortality of preterm infants born to GDM mothers remains to be elucidated.

Therefore, the present study aimed to compare the incidence of adverse perinatal outcomes in women with and without GDM and the rate of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants born to women with and without GDM. This was performed retrospectively in a cohort over a 2-year period.

Patients and methods

Study design

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (Qingdao, China). Patients who participated in this research had complete clinical data. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of the pediatric patients. The present study is a retrospective cohort study of all preterm infants who were admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of Qilu Hospital, Shandong University (Qingdao, China) after obstetric delivery between January 2019 and December of 2020. The medical records of the mothers and preterm infants were provided by the Information Systems Department of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (Qingdao, China).

The inclusion criteria were as follows: i) Consistency with the American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria for GDM in 2015(1); ii) singleton pregnancy; and iii) complete clinical data.

The exclusion criteria were: i) In vitro pregnancy embryo transfer (IVF-ET); ii) multiple pregnancy; iii) mothers with associated pathologies, such as type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, chronic respiratory diseases, neoplasms, gastrointestinal, hepatic, infectious tract diseases and heart disease; and iv) neonates born with congenital anomalies or metabolic disorders.

Outcome measures

Diagnosis of GDM was made if results from the 75-g oral glucose tolerance test revealed abnormalities. Fasting venous blood was first collected, before the patient was fed 75 g glucose dissolved in water orally. The fasting venous blood was then collected 1 and 2 h after the consumption of glucose. Screening and diagnosis of GDM were universally performed at 24-28 weeks of gestation, when GDM diagnosis would be made if the fasting blood glucose level was found to be ≥5.1 mmol/l (92 mg/dl) and/or the 1-h blood glucose level was found to be ≥10.0 mmol/l (180 mg/dl) and/or the 2-h blood glucose level was found to be ≥8.5 mmol/l (153 mg/dl).

Hypertension occurring during pregnancy for ≤20 weeks was classified as chronic hypertension if it did not progress into preeclampsia toxemia. Only after >20 weeks of gestation could pregnancy-induced hypertensive diseases be diagnosed. This was performed according to the standards of the international community's research guidelines on pregnancy-induced hypertension (9).

The attending pediatrician determined the neonatal outcomes according to both international and national definitions. The neonatal adverse outcomes assessed in the present study included ≥1 of the following: i) Pneumonia; ii) sepsis; iii) hyperbilirubinemia; iv) hypoglycemia (blood glucose level <40 mg/dl); v) hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE); vi) intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH); vii) respiratory distress syndrome (RDS); viii) bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD); and ix) necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Pneumonia, RDS, BPD and NEC were diagnosed according to the clinical and radiological criteria (10). IVH was diagnosed using cranial ultrasonography, whereas sepsis was diagnosed by positive blood culture.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (version 25; IBM Corp.). The measurement data of normal distribution was expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Comparison between continuous variables was performed using Student's t-test. Categorical data were presented as n (%), which were compared using the χ2 test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Patient summary

There were a total of 739 preterm infants admitted to the NICU between January 2019 and December 2020. According to the established criteria, 99 medical records were excluded due to the birth of twins (n=44), mothers taken ill (n=47), IVF-ET (n=3) and congenital anomalies or metabolic disorders (n=5). This resulted in the final sample containing 640 medical records in total. Of the eligible preterm infants that remained for analysis, 217 (33.9%) were to mothers with GDM. By contrast, the non-GDM group (n=423; 66.1%) consisted of mothers without diabetes.

Comparison of parameters between mothers with GDM and mothers without GDM

Compared with women without diabetes, women with GDM were older (P<0.01) and more of advanced maternal age (≥35 years) or multipara (P<0.001), tended to have a higher rate of gestational hypertension (P<0.05), placenta previa (P<0.005) and polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS; P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the occurrence of cesarean delivery, premature rupture of membranes or fetal distress (Table I).

Table I

Pregnancy outcome for women with or without GDM.

Table I

Pregnancy outcome for women with or without GDM.

CharacteristicGDM (n=217)NonGDM (n=423)χ2/t valueP-value
Maternal age, years32.8±4.630.2±4.56.8670.008
     ≥3585 (39.2)91 (21.5)22.4292.181
Primipara101 (46.5)260 (61.5)12.987<0.001
Multipara116 (53.5)163 (38.5)12.987<0.001
Cesarean delivery181 (83.4)348 (82.3)0.1300.718
Vaginal delivery36 (16.6)75 (17.7)0.1300.718
PROM90 (41.5)175 (41.4)0.0010.975
Hypertensive disorders    
     Chronic hypertension6 (2.8)17 (4.0)0.6510.420
     Gestational hypertension9 (4.1)6 (1.4)4.6670.031
     Mild preeclampsia15 (6.9)18 (4.3)2.0710.150
     Severe preeclampsia16 (7.4)38 (9.0)0.4810.488
     HELLP syndrome0 (0)3 (0.7)0.4000.527
Placental abnormality    
     Placenta previa19 (8.8)13 (3.1)9.7500.002
     Placental abruption6 (2.8)17 (4.0)0.6510.420
     Fetal distress11 (5.1)32 (7.6)1.4260.232
     PCOS8 (3.7)5 (1.2)4.5210.033

[i] Data are presented as n (%) or mean ± standard deviation. P, Student's t-test or χ2 test between GDM and non GDM mothers. GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; PROM, premature rupture of membrane; HELLP, hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets; PCOS, polycystic ovarian syndrome.

Compared with preterm infants born to mothers without diabetes, preterm infants born to mothers with GDM had longer anti-infection times (duration of antimicrobial use) (P<0.05), but there were no significant differences between the two groups in the incidence of newborn sex, gestational age, birth weight, Apgar score or hospitalization time. It showed that there was comparability among comparison of complications between the two groups of preterm infants (Table II).

Table II

Characteristics for preterm infants born to women with or without GDM.

Table II

Characteristics for preterm infants born to women with or without GDM.

CharacteristicGDM (n=217)NonGDM (n=423)χ2/t valueP-value
Male neonates113 (52.1)238 (56.3)1.0170.313
Gestational age, weeks33.5±2.233.6±2.20.5440.461
     <3269 (31.8)121 (28.6)0.7000.403
     32-3468 (31.3)125 (29.6)0.2170.641
     34-3780 (36.9)177 (41.8)1.4790.224
Birth weight, g2140.18±542.332163.81±498.660.5510.458
     <1,50037 (17.1)61 (14.4)0.7650.382
     1,500-2,500125 (57.6)255 (60.3)0.4270.513
     2,500-4,00053 (24.4)107 (25.3)0.0580.810
     >4,0002 (0.9)0 (0)1.5120.219
Apgar score    
     0-36 (2.8)9 (2.1)0.2550.614
     4-719 (8.8)47 (11.1)0.8600.354
Anti-infective treatment time, days8.91±6.067.71±6.242.3260.127
Hospitalization time (days)17.67±12.0316.38±13.301.1990.274

[i] Data are presented as n (%) or mean ± standard deviation. P, Student's t-test or χ2 test between GDM and non GDM preterm infants. GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus.

Comparing the incidence of major neonatal complications and mortality rates between the two groups, preterm infants born from mothers with GDM had a higher rate of RDS (P<0.001) and sepsis (P<0.05). However, the mortality rate was not significantly different between the two groups (Table III).

Table III

Mortality and morbidities among preterm infants born to women with or without GDM.

Table III

Mortality and morbidities among preterm infants born to women with or without GDM.

A, 25-37 weeks' gestation
Mortality and morbiditiesGDM (n=217)NonGDM (n=423) χ2-valueP-value
Pneumonia178 (82.0)337 (79.7)0.5080.476
RDS96 (44.2)131 (31.0)11.035<0.001
Hypoglycemia35 (16.1)53 (12.5)1.5670.211
Hyperbilirubinemia77 (35.5)139 (32.9)0.4410.507
Sepsis21 (9.7)23 (5.4)4.0270.045
IVH15 (6.9)30 (7.1)0.0070.933
HIE20 (9.2)33 (7.8)0.3780.539
BPD9 (4.1)10 (2.4)1.5840.208
NEC3 (1.4)5 (1.2)0.0260.872
Mortality7 (3.2)8 (1.9)1.1160.291
B, <32 weeks' gestation
Mortality and morbiditiesGDM (n=69)NonGDM (n=121) χ2-valueP-value
Pneumonia67 (97.1)110 (90.9)2.6440.104
RDS61 (88.4)92 (76.0)4.2900.038
Hypoglycemia11 (15.9)14 (11.6)0.7350.391
Hyperbilirubinemia23 (33.3)44 (36.4)0.1770.674
Sepsis12 (17.4)10 (8.3)3.5750.059
IVH5 (7.2)11 (9.1)0.1940.660
HIE5 (7.2)14 (11.6)0.9130.339
BPD9 (13.0)10 (8.3)1.1150.291
NEC3 (4.3)4 (3.3)0.0010.975
Mortality7 (10.1)7 (5.8)1.2240.269
C, 32-34 weeks' gestation
Mortality and morbiditiesGDM (n=68)NonGDM (n=125) χ2-valueP-value
Pneumonia53 (77.9)100(80)0.1140.736
RDS26 (38.2)21 (16.8)10.985<0.001
Hypoglycemia8 (11.8)13 (10.4)0.0850.771
Hyperbilirubinemia31 (45.6)46 (36.8)1.4190.234
Sepsis3 (4.4)5 (4.0)0.0580.810
IVH7 (10.3)7 (5.6)1.4420.230
HIE10 (14.7)11 (8.8)1.5840.208
BPD0 (0)0 (0)  
NEC0 (0)1 (0.8)0.0960.757
Mortality0 (0)0 (0)  
D, 34-37 weeks' gestation
Mortality and morbiditiesGDM (n=80)NonGDM (n=179) χ2-valueP-value
Pneumonia58 (72.5)127 (70.9)0.0650.799
RDS9 (11.3)18 (10.1)0.0840.772
Hypoglycemia16(20)26 (14.5)1.2200.269
Hyperbilirubinemia23 (28.8)49 (27.4)0.0520.820
Sepsis6 (7.5)8 (4.5)0.9930.319
IVH3 (3.8)12 (6.7)0.4260.514
HIE5 (6.3)8 (4.5)0.3680.544
BPD0 (0)0 (0)  
NEC0 (0)0 (0)  
Mortality0 (0)1 (0.6)0.1720.678

[i] Data are presented as n (%). GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; RDS, respiratory distress syndrome; IVH, intraventricular hemorrhage; HIE, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy; BPD, bronchopulmonary dysplasia; NEC, necrotizing enterocolitis.

Logistic regression analysis adjusted for RDS, hypoglycemia, and sepsis with the lowest P-value. The adjustment ratio for RDS caused by GDM diagnosis was 1.699 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.699-1.699, P=0.002]. This meant that GDM led to a higher risk of RDS compared with hypoglycemia (OR: 0.706, 95% CI: 0.442-1.121, P=0.360) and sepsis (OR: 1.185, 95% CI: 0.571-2.459, P=0.90). Hence, RDS was the only condition independently associated with GDM group (Table VI).

Table IV

Logistic regression analysis on morbidities among preterm infants born to women with or without GDM.

Table IV

Logistic regression analysis on morbidities among preterm infants born to women with or without GDM.

VariableP-valueOR (95% CI)
RDS0.0031.699 (1.699-1.699)
Hypoglycemia0.3600.706 (0.442-1.121)
Sepsis0.9041.185 (0.571-2.459)

[i] GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; RDS, respiratory distress syndrome; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Very low birth weight infants (VLBWI) born from mothers with GDM had a higher rate of hypoglycemia (P<0.05) and sepsis (P<0.05). The percentages of VLBWI born to mothers with GDM in BPD (24.3 vs. 11.5%) and NEC (8.1 vs. 3.3%) were greater compared with those born to mothers without GDM, though the differences did not achieve statistical significance. VLBWI born to mothers without GDM had a higher rate of HIE (14.8 vs. 5.4%), though the differences did not reach statistical significance. The mortality rate was not significant between the two groups (Table V).

Table V

Mortality and morbidities among very low birth weight infants (birth weight, <1,500 g) born to women with or without GDM.

Table V

Mortality and morbidities among very low birth weight infants (birth weight, <1,500 g) born to women with or without GDM.

CharacteristicGDM (n=37)NonGDM (n=61) χ2-valueP-value
Gestational age, weeks    
     <3231 (83.8)57 (93.4)2.3450.126
     32-346 (16.2)4 (6.6)1.4090.235
Pneumonia35 (94.6)53 (86.9)1.4940.222
RDS32 (86.5)51 (83.6)0.1470.701
Hyperbilirubinemia13 (35.1)21 (34.4)0.0050.944
Hypoglycemia9 (24.3)5 (8.2)4.8920.027
Sepsis10 (27.0)7 (11.5)3.8850.049
BPD9 (24.3)7 (11.5)2.7830.095
HIE2 (5.4)9 (14.8)1.1910.275
IVH2 (5.4)4 (6.6)0.0420.838
NEC3 (8.1)2 (3.3)0.3360.562
Mortality3 (8.1)6 (9.8)0.0050.944

[i] Data are presented as n (%). GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; RDS, respiratory distress syndrome; BPD, bronchopulmonary dysplasia; HIE, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy; IVH, intraventricular hemorrhage; NEC, necrotizing enterocolitis.

Discussion

The incidence rate of GDM in pregnancy has been increasing in women of reproductive age, against the backdrop of the worldwide prevalence of obesity and sedentary lifestyles. It was previously shown that the incidence rate of perinatal complications in diabetic women is considerably higher compared with those in the general population (11). These perinatal complications include preterm birth, macrosomia, preeclampsia and cesarean section.

In the present study, 640 hospitalized preterm infants were analyzed, of whom 217 (33.9%) were born from mothers diagnosed with GDM. The incidence of short-term pregnancy outcomes among those with and without GDM were then compared, which revealed that women with GDM tended to be older, of advanced maternal age or multipara. Women with GDM were also found to be associated with an increased risk of gestational hypertension, placenta previa and PCOS. These results are consistent with those from previous studies (12-14). However, the incidence rate of macrosomia and cesarean section was inconsistent with that previously reported (15-21). This may be associated with the target of preterm births who were hospitalized. When pregnant women experience premature rupture of membranes, placental abruption, severe preeclampsia or eclampsia and fetal distress occurs, termination of pregnancy must be performed at the first opportunity in consideration of the safety of both the mother and fetus. This procedure must also be performed regardless of whether the fetus is full term. This can not only increase the incidence rate of preterm delivery, but can also increase the rate of cesarean section whilst reducing the rate of macrosomia. In the present study, the incidence rate of severe preeclampsia, placental abruption and fetal distress was found to be increased in the non-GDM group compared with that in the GDM group. By contrast, the rate of cesarean sections was found to be increased in the non-GDM group, but there was no significant difference compared with that in the GDM group.

A previous study reported that the incidence of neonatal complications in mothers with diabetes is 3-4 times higher compared with that in mothers without diabetes (22). In the present study, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of newborn sex, gestational age, birth weight, Apgar score and hospitalization time. The results from the present study suggested that GDM was associated with an increased risk of RDS morbidity in preterm infants, which is consistent with the findings of Robert et al (23). Further analysis found that among the different gestational ages of preterm infants born to mothers with and without GDM, the most significant difference in incidence rate of RDS was in the 32-34-week-old group (P<0.001), followed by the <32-week-old group (P<0.05). However, in the VLBWI group, there was no significant difference in the incidence rate of RDS between the GDM and non-GDM groups, which may be associated with the gestational age being mostly <32 weeks in the non-GDM group. This suggested that lung immaturity remains a major risk factor for respiratory distress when the infant is premature, regardless of whether the mother was suffering from diabetes during pregnancy. With the increase in gestational age, GDM aggravates this lung immaturity further, because maternal hyperglycemia can lead to fetal hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia. The pathological mechanism of impairments in fetal lung maturity is considered to be a secondary effect of insulin on cortisol. The production of phospholipids necessary for fetal lung maturation is ultimately the product of a cascade of reactions triggered by cortisol on lung fibroblasts. Since insulin can block the effect of cortisol on fibroblasts, the synthesis of pulmonary surfactant will then be reduced (24).

The present study also found that the incidence rate of sepsis in the GDM group was significantly higher compared with that in the non-GDM group (P<0.05) and this was also observed in the VLBWI group. In addition, preterm infants born to mothers with GDM had longer anti-infection times compared with those in preterm infants born to mothers without diabetes (P<0.05). This may be due to fetal hyperglycemia. Maternal hyperglycemia leads to subsequent fetal hyperglycemia, which can then induce disorders in glucose metabolism in leukocytes and reduce glycolytic ability while also reducing the chemotactic, phagocytic and bactericidal abilities of neutrophils. In addition, hyperglycemia is conducive to the growth and reproduction of pathogenic microorganisms, causing respiratory tract, urinary tract and skin infections. Pathogenic microorganisms can then invade the blood circulation, grow, reproduce and produce toxins to induce sepsis (25).

In the present study, preterm infants of mothers with GDM had a higher rate of hypoglycemia, especially in VLBWI (P<0.05). This may be due to fetal dependence on maternal hyperglycemia (fetal hyperinsulinemia), such that following delivery, the mother's blood sugar supply becomes suddenly interrupted, these babies are then at an increased risk of hypoglycemic shock, which can contribute to brain injury if not managed carefully (26). Severe hypoglycemia occurs continuously or repeatedly and can not only cause damage to the central nervous system, but also lead to mortality. In the present study, the mortality rate in preterm infants had a higher rate of hypoglycemia in the GDM group compared with that in the non-GDM group (57.1 vs. 25%). However, this difference did not reach statistical significance, which may be due to the small sample size.

Also in the present study, NEC and BPD among VLBWI born from mothers with GDM was found to be 2.5 and 2.1 times higher, respectively, compared with those born from mothers without GDM, but the difference was not statistically significant. This may be because the sample size was relatively small. A Latin American study involving 11,991 mothers with diabetes previously reported the association between diabetes and an increased risk of NEC in VLBWI (27). Therefore, it is possible that GDM may be associated with an increased risk of NEC and BPD among VLBWI from mothers with GDM in larger sample sizes. This needs to be tested in the future by increasing the sample size. NEC and BPD are both diseases that can not only threaten the life of preterm infants, but can also significantly affect the prognosis and quality of life of the preterm infants. A number of studies have shown that a controlled diet, reasonable exercise and lifestyle improvements can effectively reduce the risk of GDM during the first or second trimester of pregnancy (28-30). This therefore suggests that altering the lifestyle can serve an important role in the management of pregnant women with GDM, which can then reduce the risk of complications in preterm infants.

A limitation of the present study is its retrospective nature with a relatively small cohort and the lack of data on the initial management of GDM, glycemic control and maternal body-mass index (BMI) of the mothers of preterm infants. These may have affected the results. Therefore, future studies should be performed prospectively in larger cohorts with the implementation of intervention strategies, such as glycemic control, maternal BMI and the prevention of complications in the mothers. It is only in this manner can the etiology of neonatal complications reported in the present study be truly explored, with the ultimate aim of effectively reducing the risk of GDM-associated complications in mothers and preterm infants.

In conclusion, the present study revealed the effect of GDM on the incidence of short-term adverse perinatal outcomes of pregnant women and preterm infants. These adverse perinatal outcomes can have long-term adverse health consequences, such as increasing the risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease in mothers, while also increasing the risk of obesity, hypertension and type 2 diabetes in the offspring later in life (31,32). Therefore, pregnant women with GDM should be diagnosed and treated early to improve both short- and long-term infant outcome. Achieving the term delivery of a healthy baby from women with GDM should be the ultimate goal.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding: No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

CHZ and PLZ confirm the authenticity of all the raw data. CHZ wrote the manuscript. CHZ and PLZ conceived and designed the study, worked on total efficiency evaluation and collected the data. CHZ analyzed and interpreted the patient data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by The Ethics Committee of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (approval no. KYLL-KS-2023144; Qingdao, China). Patients who participated in this research had complete clinical data.

Patient consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of the pediatric patients.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

International Diabetes Federation: IDF Diabetes Atlas, 10th edition. IDF, Brussels, 2015.

2 

American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022. Diabetes Care. 45 (Suppl 1):S17–S38. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

International Diabetes Federation: IDF Diabetes Atlas, 10th edition. IDF: Brussels, 2021.

4 

Ashwal E and Hod M: Gestational diabetes mellitus: Where are we now? Clin Chim Acta. 451(Pt A):14–20. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Xiong X, Saunders LD, Wang FL and Demianczuk NN: Gestational diabetes mellitus: Prevalence, risk factors, maternal and infant outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 75:221–228. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Hedderson MM, Ferrara A and Sacks DA: Gestational diabetes mellitus and lesser degrees of pregnancy hyperglycemia: Association with increased risk of spontaneous preterm birth Obstet. Gynecol. 102:850–856. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Magee MS, Walden CE, Benedetti TJ and Knopp RH: Influence of diagnostic criteria on the incidence of gestational diabetes and perinatal morbidity. JAMA. 269:609–615. 1993.PubMed/NCBI

8 

Lao TT and Ho LF: Does maternal glucose intolerance affect the length of gestation in singleton pregnancies? J Soc Gynecol Investig. 10:366–371. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Brown MA, Lindheimer MD, de Swiet M, Van Assche A and Moutquin JM: The classification and diagnosis of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: Statement from the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP). Hypertens Pregnancy. 20:IX–XIV. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Aviram A, Guy L, Ashwal E, Hiersch L, Yogev Y and Hadar E: Pregnancy outcome in pregnancies complicated with gestational diabetes mellitus and late preterm birth. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 113:198–203. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Klemetti M, Nuutila M, Tikkanen M, Kari MA, Hiilesmaa V and Teramo K: Trends in maternal BMI, glycaemic control and perinatal outcome Among type 1 diabetic pregnant women in 1989-2008. Diabetologia. 55:2327–2334. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Lao TT, Ho LF, Chan BC and Leung WC: Maternal age and prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 29:948–949. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Hiilesmaa V, Suhonen L and Teramo K: Glycaemic control is associated with pre-eclampsia but not with pregnancy-induced hypertension in women with type I diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 43:1534–1539. 2000.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y and Hod M: Epidemiology of gestational diabetes mellitus and its association with type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 21:103–113. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Schwartz R, Gruppuso PA, Petzold K, Brambilla D, Hiilesmaa V and Teramo KA: Hyperinsulinemia and macrosomia in the fetus of the diabetic mother. Diabetes Care. 17:640–648. 1994.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Gascho CL, Leandro DM, Ribeiro E, Silva T and Silva JC: Predictors of cesarean delivery in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 39:60–65. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Scifres CM, Feghali M, Dumont T, Althouse AD, Speer P, Caritis SN and Catov JM: Large-for-Gestational-Age ultrasound diagnosis and risk for cesarean delivery in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 126:978–986. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Goldman M, Kitzmiller JL, Abrams B, Cowan RM and Laros RK: Obstetrics complications with GDM: Effects of maternal weight. Diabetes. 40 (Suppl 2):S79–S82. 1991.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Buchanan TA, Kjos SL, Schafer U, Peters RK, Xiang A, Byrne J, Berkowitz K and Montoro M: Utility of fetal measurements in the management of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 21 (Suppl 2):B99–B106. 1998.PubMed/NCBI

20 

Hod M, Bar J, Peled Y, Fried S, Katz I, Itzhak M, Ashkenazi S, Schindel B and Ben-Rafael Z: Antepartum management protocol. Timing and mode of delivery in gestational diabetes. Diabetes Care. 21 (Suppl 2):B113–B117. 1998.PubMed/NCBI

21 

Conway DL and Langer O: Elective delivery of infants with macrosomia in diabetic women: Reduced shoulder dystocia versus increased cesarean deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 178:922–925. 1998.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Leung WC, Chan KK and Lao TT: Neonatal hyperthyrotro penemia in gestational diabetes mellitus and perinatal complications. Neuroendocrinology. 80:124–128. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Robert MF, Neff RK, Hubbell JP, Taeusch HW and Avery ME: Association between maternal diabetes and the respiratory-distress syndrome in the newborn. N Engl J Med. 294:357–360. 1976.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Carlson KS, Smith BT and Post M: Insulin acts on the fibroblast to inhibit glucocorticoid stimulation of lung maturation. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 57:1577–1779. 1984.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Gornik I, Vujaklija A, Lukić E, Madzarac G and Gasparović V: Hyperglycemia in sepsis is a risk factor for development of type II diabetes. J Crit Care. 25:263–269. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Esakoff TF, Cheng YW, Sparks TN and Caughey AB: The association between birthweight 4000 g or greater and perinatal outcomes in patients with and without gestational diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 200:672.e1–e4. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Grandi C, Tapia JL and Cardoso VC: Impact of maternal diabetes mellitus on mortality and morbidity of very low birth weight infants: A multicenter Latin America study. J Pediatr (Rio J). 91:234–241. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Koivusalo SB, Rönö K, Klemetti MM, Roine RP, Lindström J, Erkkola M, Kaaja RJ, Pöyhönen-Alho M, Tiitinen A, Huvinen E, et al: Gestational diabetes mellitus can be prevented by lifestyle intervention: The finnish gestational diabetes prevention study (RADIEL): A randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 39:24–30. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Wang C, Wei Y, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Xu Q, Sun Y, Su S, Zhang L, Liu C, Feng Y, et al: A randomized clinical trial of exercise during pregnancy to prevent gestational diabetes mellitus and improve pregnancy outcome in overweight and obese pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 216:340–351. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

30 

Metzger BE, Buchanan TA, Coustan DR, de Leiva A, Dunger DB, Hadden DR, Hod M, Kitzmiller JL, Kjos SL, Oats JN, et al: Summary and recommendations of the Fifth International workshop-conference on gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 30 (Suppl 2):S251–S260. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Dabelea D, Hanson RL, Lindsay RS, Pettitt DJ, Imperatore G, Gabir MM, Roumain J, Bennett PH and Knowler WC: Intrauterine exposure to diabetes conveys risks for type 2 diabetes and obesity: A study of discordant sibships. Diabetes. 49:2208–2211. 2000.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Holmes VA, Young IS, Patterson CC, Pearson DW, Walker JD, Maresh MJ and McCance DR: Diabetes and Pre-eclampsia Intervention Trial Study Group. Optimal glycemic control, pre-eclampsia, and gestational hypertension in women with type 1 diabetes in the Diabetes and Pre-eclampsia Intervention Trial. Diabetes Care. 34:1683–1688. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

September-2023
Volume 26 Issue 3

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Zhang C and Zhang C: Adverse perinatal outcomes complicated with gestational diabetes mellitus in preterm mothers and preterm infants. Exp Ther Med 26: 425, 2023
APA
Zhang, C., & Zhang, C. (2023). Adverse perinatal outcomes complicated with gestational diabetes mellitus in preterm mothers and preterm infants. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 26, 425. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2023.12124
MLA
Zhang, C., Zhang, P."Adverse perinatal outcomes complicated with gestational diabetes mellitus in preterm mothers and preterm infants". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 26.3 (2023): 425.
Chicago
Zhang, C., Zhang, P."Adverse perinatal outcomes complicated with gestational diabetes mellitus in preterm mothers and preterm infants". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 26, no. 3 (2023): 425. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2023.12124