|
1
|
Kim YH, Ha KY, Rhyu KW, Park HY, Cho CH,
Kim HC, Lee HJ and Kim SI: Lumbar interbody fusion: Techniques,
pearls and pitfalls. Asian Spine J. 14:730–741. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
2
|
Su SF, Wu MS, Yeh WT and Liao YC: Effects
of lumbar fusion surgery with ISOBAR devices versus posterior
lumbar interbody fusion surgery on pain and disability in patients
with lumbar degenerative diseases: A meta-analysis. J Invest Surg.
33:79–93. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
3
|
Gao Y, Li J, Cui H, Zhang F, Sun Y, Li Z,
Ding W, Shen Y and Zhang W: Comparison of intervertebral fusion
rates of different bone graft materials in extreme lateral
interbody fusion. Medicine (Baltimore). 98(e17685)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
4
|
Lokhande PV: Full endoscopic spine
surgery. J Orthop. 40:74–82. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
5
|
McGrath LB, White-Dzuro GA and Hofstetter
CP: Comparison of clinical outcomes following minimally invasive or
lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral
decompression. J Neurosurg Spine. 30:491–499. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
6
|
Ju CI and Lee SM: Complications and
management of endoscopic spinal surgery. Neurospine. 20:56–77.
2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
7
|
Du JW, Zhang LM, Yan YQ, Zhang YN, Rong
XQ, Xiao SH and Zhang XF: Case report: Adult degenerative scoliosis
in two patients treated with percutaneous spinal
endoscopic-assisted lumbar interbody fusion and percutaneous
pedicle screw fixation. Front Surg. 9(730504)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
8
|
Kim CH, Easley K, Lee JS, Hong JY, Virk M,
Hsieh PC and Yoon ST: Comparison of minimally invasive versus open
transforaminal interbody lumbar fusion. Global Spine J. 10 (2
Suppl):143S–150S. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
9
|
Sayari AJ, Patel DV, Yoo JS and Singh K:
Device solutions for a challenging spine surgery: Minimally
invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). Expert
Rev Med Devices. 16:299–305. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
10
|
Brusko GD and Wang MY: Endoscopic lumbar
interbody fusion. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 31:17–24. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
11
|
Fan W, Chen Y, Zhou T, Xu Y and Gu Y:
Comparison of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery (PTES)
with MIS-TLIF for treating lumbar degenerative disease in obese
patients. J Pain Res. 18:555–561. 2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
12
|
Hao J, Chen R, Zheng J, Xu S, Xue H and
Yao Y: Clinical outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic
discectomy (UBE) compared with conventional open lumbar discectomy
with 3D microscope (OLDM) assisted. Medicine (Baltimore).
104(e41440)2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
13
|
Ma T, Tu X, Li J, Geng Y, Wu J, Chen S,
Yan D, Jiang M, Gao G and Nong L: Comparative analysis of clinical
efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic and open transforaminal
lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative.
Front Surg. 12(1487168)2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
14
|
Lee MH, Jang HJ, Moon BJ, Kim KH, Chin DK,
Kim KS and Park JY: Comparative outcomes of biportal endoscopic
decompression, conventional subtotal laminectomy, and minimally
invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar central
stenosis. Neurospine. 21:1178–1189. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
15
|
You KH, Hyun JT, Park SM, Kang MS, Cho SK
and Park HJ: Comparison of clinical and radiologic outcomes between
biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and
posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Sci Rep.
14(29652)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
16
|
He Y, Cheng Q and She J: Unilateral
biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally
invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-segment
lumbar degenerative disease: A meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet
Disord. 25(938)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
17
|
Meyerding HW: Spondylolisthesis. Surg
Gynecol Obstet. 54:371–377. 1932.
|
|
18
|
Cook CE, Garcia AN, Wright A, Shaffrey C
and Gottfried O: Measurement properties of the oswestry disability
index in recipients of lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).
46:E118–E125. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
19
|
Faiz KW: VAS-visual analog scale. Tidsskr
Nor Laegeforen. 134(323)2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar : (In Norwegian).
|
|
20
|
Burman MS: Myeloscopy or the direct
visualization of the spinal canal and its contents. J Bone Joint
Surg. 13:695–696. 1931.
|
|
21
|
Pool JL: Direct visualization of dorsal
nerve roots of the cauda equina by means of a myeloscope. Arch
Neurol. Psychiatr. 39:1308–1312. 1938.
|
|
22
|
Cloward R: The treatment of ruptured
lumbar intervertebral discs by vertebral body fusion. I.
Indications, operative technique, after care. J Neurosurg.
10:154–168. 1953.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
23
|
Kambin P and Zhou L: History and current
status of percutaneous arthroscopic disc surgery. Spine (Phila Pa
1976). 21 (24Suppl):S57–S61. 1996.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
24
|
Kambin P: Arthroscopic microdiskectomy. Mt
Sinai J Med. 58:159–164. 1991.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
25
|
Leu HF and Hauser RK: Percutaneous
endoscopic lumbar spine fusion. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 7:107–717.
1996.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
26
|
Spiker WR, Goz V and Brodke DS: Lumbar
interbody fusions for degenerative spondylolisthesis: Review of
techniques, indications, and outcomes. Global Spine J. 9:77–84.
2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
27
|
Ito K, Ito Z, Nakamura S, Ito F, Shibayama
M and Miura Y: Minimization of lumbar interbody fusion by
percutaneous full-endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (PELIF), and
its minimally invasiveness comparison with minimally invasive
surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF).
Interdiscip Neurosurg. 34(101794)2023.
|
|
28
|
Morimoto M, Wada K, Tamaki S, Soeda S,
Sugiura K, Manabe H, Tezuka F, Yamashita K and Sairyo K: Clinical
outcome of full endoscopic trans kambin's triangle lumbar interbody
fusion: A systematic review. World Neurosurg. 178:317–329.
2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
29
|
Hasan S, White-Dzuro B, Barber JK, Wagner
R and Hofstetter CP: The endoscopic trans-superior articular
process approach: A novel minimally invasive surgical corridor to
the lateral recess. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 19:E1–E10.
2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
30
|
Hirase T, Ling JF, Haghshenas V and Weiner
BK: Instrumented versus noninstrumented spinal fusion for
degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: A systematic review. Clin
Spine Surg. 35:213–221. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
31
|
Chien KT, Feng HW, Chang TK, Liu YC, Chen
LP, Huang YC, Lian YS and Li JY: Optimizing disc and cartilage
endplate preparation in full-endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion: An
in-depth exploration of surgical instruments with a technique note
and narrative review. World Neurosurg. 189:228–247. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
32
|
Chen Y, Qin H and Zhong Y: Percutaneous
lumbar interbody fusion with novel self-developed instruments for
lumbar spondylolisthesis. Orthop J China. 30:1410–1413.
2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar : (In Chinese).
|
|
33
|
Lin GX, Chen CM, Rui G and Kim JS: A pilot
study of endoscope-assisted MITLIF with fluoroscopy-guided
technique: Intraoperative objective and subjective evaluation of
disc space preparation. BMC Surg. 22(109)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
34
|
Canseco JA, Karamian BA, DiMaria SL, Patel
PD, Divi SN, Chang M, Timmons T, Grewal L, Hallman H, Lee JK, et
al: Static versus expandable polyether ether ketone (PEEK)
interbody cages: A comparison of one-year clinical and radiographic
outcomes for one-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
World Neurosurg. 152:e492–e501. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
35
|
Kim YH, Ha KY, Kim YS, Kim KW, Rhyu KW,
Park JB, Shin JH, Kim YY, Lee JS, Park HY, et al: Lumbar interbody
fusion and osteobiologics for lumbar fusion. Asian Spine J.
16:1022–1033. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
36
|
Zhang S, Liu Z, Lu C, Zhao L, Feng C, Wang
Y and Zhang Y: Oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with
different internal fixations for the treatment of degenerative
lumbar spine disease: A finite element analysis. BMC Musculoskelet
Disord. 23(206)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
37
|
Zhang H, Zhou C, Wang C, Zhu K, Tu Q, Kong
M, Zhao C and Ma X: Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar
interbody fusion: Technique note and comparison of early outcomes
with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for
lumbar spondylolisthesis. Int J Gen Med. 14:549–558.
2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
38
|
Fan Z, Wu X, Guo Z, Shen N, Chen B and
Xiang H: Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion
(ULIF) versus endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
(Endo-TLIF) in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis along with
intervertebral disc herniation: A retrospective analysis. BMC
Musculoskelet Disord. 25(186)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
39
|
Li X, Qu Y, Zhou L, Zhou Y, Peng B and Duo
J: Meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral
biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion versus endoscopic
lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative
diseases. World Neurosurg. 195(123662)2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
40
|
Li Y, Zhang C, Zhan P, Fu H and Yip W:
Trends and projections of universal health coverage indicators in
China, 1993-2030: An analysis of data from four nationwide
household surveys. Lancet Reg Health West Pac.
31(100646)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
41
|
Xie YZ, Shi Y, Zhou Q, Feng CQ, Zhou Y, Li
T, Yu Y and Fan XH: Comparison of the safety and efficacy of
unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion and
uniportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion: A 1-year follow-up. J
Orthop Surg Res. 17(360)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
42
|
Gunjotikar S, Pestonji M, Tanaka M,
Komatsubara T, Ekade SJ, Heydar AM and Hieu HK: Evolution, current
trends, and latest advances of endoscopic spine surgery. J Clin
Med. 13(3208)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
43
|
Liu Z, Wang S, Li T, Chen S, Li Y, Xie W
and Tang J: Clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic posterior
lumbar interbody fusion and modified posterior lumbar interbody
fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. J Orthop
Surg Res. 19(70)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
44
|
Wagner R and Haefner M: Uniportal
endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion. Neurospine. 17 (Suppl
1):S120–S128. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
45
|
Hu X, Yan L, Jin X, Liu H, Chai J and Zhao
B: Endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion, minimally invasive
transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, and open transforaminal
lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative
diseases: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Global
Spine J. 14:295–305. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
46
|
Uçar BY, Özcan Ç, Polat Ö and Aman T:
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative
disease: Patient selection and perspectives. Orthop Res Rev.
11:183–189. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
47
|
Woods KRM, Billys JB and Hynes RA:
Technical description of oblique lateral interbody fusion at L1-L5
(OLIF25) and at L5-S1 (OLIF51) and evaluation of complication and
fusion rates. Spine J. 17:545–553. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
