Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Oncology Letters
      • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • Information for Authors
    • Information for Reviewers
    • Information for Librarians
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Reviewers
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Login Register Submit
  • This site uses cookies
  • You can change your cookie settings at any time by following the instructions in our Cookie Policy. To find out more, you may read our Privacy Policy.

    I agree
Search articles by DOI, keyword, author or affiliation
Search
Advanced Search
presentation
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
Join Editorial Board Propose a Special Issue
Print ISSN: 1792-0981 Online ISSN: 1792-1015
Journal Cover
February-2026 Volume 31 Issue 2

Full Size Image

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

Journals

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.

Molecular Medicine Reports

Molecular Medicine Reports

Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.

Biomedical Reports

Biomedical Reports

Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.

World Academy of Sciences Journal

World Academy of Sciences Journal

Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.

International Journal of Epigenetics

International Journal of Epigenetics

Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.

Medicine International

Medicine International

An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.

Journal Cover
February-2026 Volume 31 Issue 2

Full Size Image

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

  • Article
  • Citations
    • Cite This Article
    • Download Citation
    • Create Citation Alert
    • Remove Citation Alert
    • Cited By
  • Similar Articles
    • Related Articles (in Spandidos Publications)
    • Similar Articles (Google Scholar)
    • Similar Articles (PubMed)
  • Download PDF
  • Download XML
  • View XML
Article Open Access

Development and internal validation of a clinical nomogram for predicting bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants

  • Authors:
    • Yan-Sha Pan
    • Lan Xiao
    • Wen-Bin Dong
    • Jia-Wen Dang
  • View Affiliations / Copyright

    Affiliations: Department of Pediatrics, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Birth Defects, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan 646000, P.R. China
    Copyright: © Pan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
  • Article Number: 50
    |
    Published online on: December 9, 2025
       https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2025.13045
  • Expand metrics +
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

This article is mentioned in:



Abstract

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is a major morbidity in preterm infants, necessitating early risk assessment to guide interventions. The present study aimed to develop and internally validate a clinical prediction model for BPD. A total 120 preterm infants (<32 gestation weeks) admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit from January 2020 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Infants were retrospectively classified into BPD (n=34) and non-BPD (n=86) groups based on the 2018 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development criteria. Clinical variables, including maternal, neonatal, respiratory and comorbid factors, were assessed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression identified independent predictors, which were used to construct a nomogram. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) of a receiver operating characteristic curve, a calibration curve and Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Internal validation was performed via bootstrapping. The results demonstrated that gestational age, birth weight, sepsis, patent ductus arteriosus and intraventricular hemorrhage were independent predictors of BPD. The model demonstrated good discrimination (AUC=0.918; 95% confidence interval, 0.866-0.971) and good calibration. The nomogram enabled individualized risk estimation, and internal validation confirmed model robustness. In conclusion, the proposed nomogram demonstrated strong discriminative power and clinical applicability for early BPD risk assessment. Future multicenter validation will help extend its generalizability across diverse neonatal populations.

Introduction

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is a chronic lung disease that remains a notable cause of morbidity in preterm infants, particularly those born at low gestational ages (<28 weeks) or with very low birth weight (<1,000 g). Globally, among infants born at <28 weeks' gestation, reported incidence of BPD ranges from 10 to 89% depending on region and definition, with population-based rates in recent meta-analyses of very low birth weight (<1,500 g) or very low gestational age (<32 weeks) neonates estimated at approximately 21% (95% CI 19-24%) (1). Despite advances in neonatal intensive care, the incidence of BPD has not markedly declined, largely due to the increased survival of extremely preterm infants who remain at the highest risk (2-4). BPD is characterized by abnormal alveolar and vascular development, resulting from a complex interplay of antenatal, perinatal and postnatal factors, including inflammation, oxygen toxicity, mechanical ventilation and sepsis (5).

Early identification of infants at high risk for BPD is crucial for optimizing management strategies and minimizing long-term complications such as recurrent wheezing, reduced pulmonary function, asthma-like symptoms, feeding difficulties, growth failure, and neurodevelopmental impairments including cognitive delays, motor dysfunction, and increased risk of cerebral palsy (6,7). However, the current diagnostic criteria for BPD, as updated by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) in 2018, rely on the need for respiratory support or supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks postmenstrual age, which is defined as gestational age at birth plus the infant's postnatal age. Because this assessment point occurs after birth, it limits the usefulness of the criteria for early risk stratification (8,9). This highlights the need for early-stage predictive tools to identify high-risk infants before BPD diagnosis is clinically confirmed.

Previous studies have explored risk factors for BPD, such as gestational age, birth weight and exposure to invasive ventilation. However, to the best of our knowledge, few studies have integrated these variables into a comprehensive, clinically applicable prediction model (10-12). Furthermore, the utility of advanced statistical tools such as nomograms in quantifying individualized risk has been underexplored in neonatal populations. Nomograms provide a graphical representation of complex statistical models, and are particularly valuable in clinical practice for their simplicity and interpretability (13).

The present study aimed to develop and validate a robust risk prediction model for BPD in preterm infants, incorporating readily available clinical and demographic variables. Using a retrospective cohort of 120 preterm infants, a nomogram was constructed to estimate individualized risk, and its performance was evaluated in terms of discrimination, calibration and internal validation. The present model aimed to provide an early and accurate assessment of BPD risk, thereby supporting clinical decision-making and improving outcomes for preterm infants.

Patients and methods

Study design and population

The present retrospective cohort study was conducted to develop and validate a prediction model for BPD in preterm infants. Data were collected from 120 preterm infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China, between January 2020 and December 2022. Infants were stratified into two groups based on their BPD status, defined according to the 2018 diagnostic criteria published by the NICHD: A BPD group (n=34) and a non-BPD group (n=86).

Inclusion criteria included preterm infants with gestational ages <32 weeks and birth weights ≤2,500 g who were admitted to the NICU within the first week of life. Exclusion criteria included i) major congenital anomalies or chromosomal abnormalities; ii) severe congenital heart defects; iii) genetic or metabolic disorders; iv) mortality or discharge before 14 days of life; and v) transfer to another hospital within 7 days of birth. During the study period (January 2020-December 2022), a total of 156 preterm infants with gestational age <32 weeks were admitted to the NICU of The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University (Luzhou, China). Of these, 36 patients were excluded for the following reasons: Major congenital anomalies or chromosomal abnormalities (n=5), severe congenital heart defects (n=4), genetic or metabolic disorder (n=2), early mortality or discharge before 14 days of life (n=15) and transfer to another hospital within 7 days of birth (n=10). The final analysis therefore included 120 infants, representing an inclusion rate of 76.9%. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University (approval no. KY2025055), and informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study.

Data collection

Clinical and demographic data were collected from electronic medical records. Maternal factors included maternal age (years), parity, pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) and the presence of chronic medical conditions such as hypertension, diabetes or thyroid disease. Antenatal corticosteroid administration was recorded in detail, including whether any course was received, the specific agent used (betamethasone or dexamethasone) and whether the course was complete or partial according to the standardized institutional protocol. Chorioamnionitis was diagnosed through clinical or histopathological findings. The mode of delivery (vaginal or cesarean section) was also documented. Neonatal characteristics encompassed gestational age measured in completed weeks, birth weight in grams, sex, and Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min, which were documented to assess immediate postnatal adaptation (14). Detailed respiratory support data were obtained, including the duration (in days) and type of support provided, such as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) and high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV). Additionally, neonatal comorbidities were recorded, including the occurrence of sepsis confirmed by positive blood cultures or clinical diagnosis, patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) diagnosed via echocardiography, intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH, graded using Papile's classification) and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC, identified based on modified Bell's criteria) (15). For the purposes of the prediction model, these comorbidities were defined as events occurring within the first 14 days of life, ensuring that only early-onset cases were included to maintain the model's utility for early risk stratification of BPD. Although the formal definitions for sepsis, PDA, IVH and NEC in the present dataset were restricted to events occurring within the first 14 days of life, in clinical practice, the majority of these conditions in the present cohort were either diagnosed or strongly suspected within the first 72 h after birth, based on early clinical signs, laboratory findings, and echocardiographic or cranial ultrasound assessments. Therefore, these variables retain practical utility for early postnatal risk stratification. Finally, key outcome measures included the length of hospital stay (in days) and the presence or absence of BPD, defined according to the 2018 NICHD criteria. This comprehensive dataset provided a robust foundation for analyzing factors contributing to BPD in preterm infants.

During the study period, respiratory management in the NICU followed a standardized protocol based on gestational age, respiratory distress severity and oxygen requirements. Initial support typically involved CPAP for infants with mild-to-moderate respiratory distress. NIPPV was applied when CPAP was insufficient, or in cases of apnea or moderate respiratory acidosis. HFOV was typically initiated in cases of severe respiratory failure or persistent hypercapnia despite conventional support. Intubation and mechanical ventilation were considered in cases of refractory hypoxemia, recurrent apnea unresponsive to non-invasive support or clinical deterioration. Decisions regarding escalation or de-escalation of support were made collaboratively by the attending neonatologist and the respiratory team based on ongoing clinical assessments.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted to summarize baseline characteristics, develop a predictive model and evaluate its performance. Baseline characteristics were described using the mean ± standard deviation for normally distributed continuous variables, median (interquartile range) for non-normally distributed continuous variables and frequencies (percentages) for categorical variables. Comparisons between groups were performed using independent Student's t-tests for normally distributed continuous variables, the Mann-Whitney U test for non-normally distributed variables, and χ2 or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. Univariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association between each predictor variable and the risk of BPD. Prior to multivariate modeling, collinearity among candidate predictors (particularly gestational age and birth weight) was assessed using variance inflation factors (VIFs). All VIF values were <2, indicating no significant multicollinearity. Variables with P<0.1 in univariate analysis were included in a multivariate logistic regression model, where a stepwise backward elimination approach was applied to identify independent predictors. The results were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). To evaluate model performance, discrimination was assessed using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, with calculation of the area under the curve (AUC), while calibration was evaluated using a calibration curve comparing predicted and observed probabilities. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test was used to assess goodness-of-fit. Based on the multivariate logistic regression model, a nomogram was constructed to visually represent the BPD risk prediction tool. Points were assigned to each predictor based on the magnitude of regression coefficients in the multivariable logistic regression model, with the predictor contributing the largest coefficient scaled to 100 points and other predictors allocated proportionally. The total points were then mapped onto the corresponding predicted probability of BPD. Internal validation of the nomogram was performed using bootstrapping with 1,000 resamples to ensure robustness. All analyses were conducted using R software (version 4.2.2; Posit Software, PBC), with the ‘rms’ and ‘pROC’ packages utilized for nomogram construction and ROC curve analysis (16,17). There were no missing data for the variables included in the analysis; therefore, no imputation or exclusion due to missingness was required.

Results

Baseline characteristics

A total of 120 preterm infants were included in the analysis, of whom 34 (28.3%) developed BPD. The baseline characteristics of the study population stratified by BPD status are summarized in Table I. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of maternal characteristics, including age, primiparity, pre-pregnancy BMI or prevalence of chronic medical conditions such as hypertension or diabetes. Antenatal corticosteroid exposure was also comparable between groups, with similar proportions receiving any corticosteroid, similar distributions of specific agents (betamethasone or dexamethasone) and no difference in the proportion of patients completing the full treatment course. Infants in the BPD group had significantly lower gestational age (28.02±1.05 vs. 29.29±1.70 weeks; P<0.001) and lower median birth weight (1,036.3 vs. 1,244.7 g; P<0.001) compared with those in the non-BPD group. CPAP use was significantly less frequent in the BPD group (35.3 vs. 59.3%; P=0.018) than in the non-BPD group, whereas HFOV use was more common (35.3 vs. 17.4%; P=0.035). Comorbidities, including sepsis (58.8 vs. 8.1%; P<0.001), PDA (55.9 vs. 29.1%; P=0.006), IVH (29.4 vs. 11.6%; P=0.018) and NEC (23.5 vs. 5.8%; P=0.013), were significantly more prevalent in the BPD group than in the non-BPD group. The median length of hospital stay was significantly longer among infants with BPD (69.5 vs. 34 days; P<0.001).

Table I

Baseline characteristics of the study population stratified by BPD status.

Table I

Baseline characteristics of the study population stratified by BPD status.

CharacteristicNon-BPD (n=86)BPD (n=34)P-value
Maternal characteristics   
     Maternal age, years (mean ± SD)29.7±4.830.1±5.10.642
     Primiparity (%)49 (57.0)18 (52.9)0.683
     Chronic hypertension, n (%)6 (7.0)4 (11.8)0.462
     Diabetes mellitus, n (%)8 (9.3)3 (8.8)>0.999
     Pre-pregnancy BMI, kg/m² (mean ± SD)22.9±3.423.4±3.60.514
     Antenatal corticosteroids use   
          Any, n (%)64 (81.7)27 (79.4)0.565
          Betamethasone, n (%)39 (45.3)16 (47.1)0.859
          Dexamethasone, n (%)25 (29.1)11 (32.4)0.815
          Complete course, n (%)58 (67.4)24 (70.6)0.753
Neonatal characteristics   
     Gestational age, weeks (mean ± SD)29.29±1.7028.02±1.05<0.001
     Birth weight, g [median (IQR)]1,244.7 (989.9-1,354.0)1,036.3 (890.2-1,123.2)<0.001
     Male sex, n (%)45 (52.3)22 (64.7)0.218
Respiratory support use   
     CPAP, n (%)51 (59.3)12 (35.3)0.018
     NIPPV, n (%)37 (43.0)21 (61.8)0.064
     HFOV, n (%)15 (17.4)12 (35.3)0.035
Comorbidities   
     Sepsis, n (%)7 (8.1)20 (58.8)<0.001
     PDA, n (%)25 (29.1)19 (55.9)0.006
     IVH, n (%)10 (11.6)10 (29.4)0.018
     NEC, n (%)5 (5.8)8 (23.5)0.013
Length of stay, days [median (IQR)]34.0 (31.0-37.0)69.5 (67.0-72.8)<0.001

[i] Values are expressed as mean ± SD, median (IQR) or n (%). Comparisons between groups were performed using independent Student's t-test for normally distributed continuous variables, the Mann-Whitney U test for non-normally distributed continuous variables and the χ2 or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. BPD, bronchopulmonary dysplasia; BMI, body mass index; IQR, interquartile range; CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure; NIPPV, non-invasive positive pressure ventilation; HFOV, high-frequency oscillatory ventilation; PDA, patent ductus arteriosus; IVH, intraventricular hemorrhage; NEC, necrotizing enterocolitis; SD, standard deviation.

Univariate and multivariate analyses

The results of univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses for predictors of BPD are presented in Table II. In the univariate analysis, lower gestational age, lower birth weight, absence of CPAP, use of HFOV, and presence of sepsis, PDA, IVH and NEC were significantly associated with an increased risk of BPD (P<0.05 for all). In the multivariate model, lower gestational age (OR=0.625; 95% CI, 0.420-0.932; P=0.021), sepsis (OR=12.847; 95% CI, 3.187-51.789; P<0.001), PDA (OR=4.514; 95% CI, 1.324-15.389; P=0.016) and IVH (OR=5.926; 95% CI, 1.217-28.845; P=0.028) remained independent predictors of BPD. Although birth weight did not reach statistical significance in the multivariate model (OR=0.997; P=0.059), it was retained due to its established clinical importance in neonatal outcome prediction (18).

Table II

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses of risk factors for bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Table II

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses of risk factors for bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

CharacteristicUnivariate OR (95% CI)P-valueMultivariate OR (95% CI)P-value
Gestational age, weeks0.570 (0.419-0.777)<0.0010.625 (0.420-0.932)0.021
Birth weight, g0.997 (0.994-0.999)<0.0010.997 (0.994-1.000)0.059
Male sex1.670 (0.735-3.796)0.221--
Antenatal steroids1.326 (0.507-3.470)0.566--
CPAP use2.671 (1.171-6.093)0.0202.158 (0.656-7.098)0.205
NIPPV use2.139 (0.949-4.822)0.0672.458 (0.731-8.271)0.146
HFOV use2.582 (1.053-6.332)0.0381.725 (0.440-6.758)0.434
Sepsis16.122 (5.748-45.225)<0.00112.847 (3.187-51.789)<0.001
PDA3.091 (1.359-7.028)0.0074.514 (1.324-15.389)0.016
IVH3.167 (1.177-8.517)0.0225.926 (1.217-28.845)0.028
NEC4.985 (1.499-16.575)0.0093.663 (0.718-18.698)0.119

[i] Univariate analysis was performed for all variables, and multivariate analysis included variables with P<0.1 in the univariate analysis. Gestational age and birth weight were analyzed as continuous variables. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. The dash (-) indicates that the variable was not included in the final multivariate model due to lack of significance in univariate analysis. CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure; NIPPV, non-invasive positive pressure ventilation; HFOV, high-frequency oscillatory ventilation; PDA, patent ductus arteriosus; IVH, intraventricular hemorrhage; NEC, necrotizing enterocolitis; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Model performance and validation

The predictive performance of the multivariate model was evaluated through discrimination and calibration analyses. The nomogram demonstrated excellent discrimination, with an apparent AUC of 0.918 (95% CI, 0.866-0.971) in the derivation dataset (Fig. 1). This result indicates indicating only minimal optimism and confirms the robustness of the model after adjustment for potential overfitting. The calibration performance of the internally validated model is shown in Fig. 2, which demonstrates strong agreement between observed and predicted probabilities. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test yielded a non-significant result (P>0.05), indicating a good overall model fit.

ROC curve for the BPD risk prediction
model. The ROC curve illustrates the diagnostic performance of the
prediction model for BPD. AUC=0.918 (95% CI, 0.866-0.971) indicated
the excellent discriminative ability of the model. BPD,
bronchopulmonary dysplasia; AUC, area under the curve; CI,
confidence interval; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; TPR,
true positive rate; FPR, false positive rate.

Figure 1

ROC curve for the BPD risk prediction model. The ROC curve illustrates the diagnostic performance of the prediction model for BPD. AUC=0.918 (95% CI, 0.866-0.971) indicated the excellent discriminative ability of the model. BPD, bronchopulmonary dysplasia; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; TPR, true positive rate; FPR, false positive rate.

Calibration curve for the BPD risk
prediction model. The calibration curve compares the predicted
probabilities of BPD occurrence against the observed probabilities.
The apparent (blue) and bias-corrected (red) curves align closely
with the ideal line (gray dash), indicating a good calibration of
the model. BPD, bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Figure 2

Calibration curve for the BPD risk prediction model. The calibration curve compares the predicted probabilities of BPD occurrence against the observed probabilities. The apparent (blue) and bias-corrected (red) curves align closely with the ideal line (gray dash), indicating a good calibration of the model. BPD, bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Nomogram construction

Based on the final multivariate model, a clinical nomogram was constructed to estimate the individualized risk of BPD in preterm infants (Fig. 3). The predictors included in the nomogram were gestational age, birth weight, sex, antenatal steroid use, respiratory support modalities (CPAP, NIPPV and HFOV), and comorbidities (sepsis, PDA, IVH and NEC). Although certain predictors did not reach statistical significance in the multivariate model, they were retained in the nomogram because of their established clinical relevance and routine use in neonatal risk assessment, consistent with accepted nomogram-building practices. Each factor contributed a weighted score to the total, which corresponded to the predicted probability of BPD. This nomogram offered a practical and interpretable tool for bedside application in neonatal intensive care settings.

Nomogram for BPD risk prediction. The
nomogram visualizes the contribution of multiple predictors to the
risk of BPD. Predictors include gestational age, birth weight, sex,
antenatal steroids, respiratory support modes, sepsis, PDA, IVH and
NEC. The total points correspond to the predicted probability of
BPD. BPD, bronchopulmonary dysplasia CPAP, continuous positive
airway pressure; NIPPV; non-invasive positive pressure ventilation;
HFOV, high-frequency oscillatory ventilation; PDA, patent ductus
arteriosus; IVH, intraventricular hemorrhage; NEC, necrotizing
enterocolitis.

Figure 3

Nomogram for BPD risk prediction. The nomogram visualizes the contribution of multiple predictors to the risk of BPD. Predictors include gestational age, birth weight, sex, antenatal steroids, respiratory support modes, sepsis, PDA, IVH and NEC. The total points correspond to the predicted probability of BPD. BPD, bronchopulmonary dysplasia CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure; NIPPV; non-invasive positive pressure ventilation; HFOV, high-frequency oscillatory ventilation; PDA, patent ductus arteriosus; IVH, intraventricular hemorrhage; NEC, necrotizing enterocolitis.

Discussion

The present study provides a comprehensive analysis of risk factors for BPD and presents a validated predictive model for early identification of at-risk preterm infants. The present model demonstrated high discriminatory power, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.918, and robust calibration, highlighting its potential clinical utility.

Here, gestational age and birth weight emerged as critical predictors of BPD, which is consistent with prior research highlighting the heightened vulnerability of extremely preterm infants and those with impaired early growth (19-21). Lower gestational age (OR=0.625; P=0.021) reflects the immaturity of the lung parenchyma, surfactant deficiency, and susceptibility to barotrauma and oxygen toxicity (5). Similarly, reduced birth weight (P=0.059 in multivariate analysis) underscores the importance of intrauterine growth and its association with postnatal outcomes (22). These findings reinforce the need for strategies targeting antenatal interventions, such as corticosteroids and optimal timing of delivery, to reduce prematurity-related risks.

In the present study, sepsis showed the strongest independent association with BPD in the multivariate model (OR=12.847; P<0.001), with an effect size notably greater than that of the other significant predictors. This increased risk aligns with prior studies linking systemic inflammation to disrupted alveolarization and pulmonary vascular remodeling (23,24). Pro-inflammatory cytokines and reactive oxygen species released during sepsis amplify lung injury, perpetuating the cycle of inflammation and impaired repair mechanisms (25,26). This underscores the importance of stringent infection control measures in the NICU, including early recognition and management of sepsis.

Notably, the OR value for sepsis in the multivariate analysis conducted in the present study was markedly high (OR=12.847). This magnitude likely reflects both the strong biological plausibility of the association and the relatively concentrated distribution of severe early-onset sepsis in the present BPD cohort. All cases of sepsis included in the present analysis were diagnosed within the first 14 days of life, a critical period for lung development, during which systemic inflammation can exert disproportionate and irreversible effects on alveolarization and microvascular maturation (27). Early-onset sepsis in preterm infants has been shown to trigger release of cytokines (including IL-6, TNF-α and IL-1β), oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction, which collectively disrupt pulmonary angiogenesis and promote interstitial fibrosis (23,24,26). Furthermore, severe infection frequently necessitates prolonged invasive ventilation and higher oxygen exposure, compounding the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury and oxygen toxicity (25).

Clinically, this finding underscores the imperative for early sepsis prevention and prompt antimicrobial treatment in the NICU, particularly during the first 2 postnatal weeks. Stringent infection control protocols, rapid pathogen identification and optimized empiric antibiotic strategies may therefore represent critical interventions to mitigate BPD risk in high-risk preterm populations.

PDA (OR=4.514; P=0.016) was a significant predictor identified in the present study, in agreement with previous studies suggesting that prolonged ductal patency exacerbates pulmonary overcirculation, increasing the risk of pulmonary edema and ventilator dependency (28,29). The role of PDA treatment in mitigating BPD remains controversial; however, the present findings suggest that early closure, whether pharmacological or surgical, may reduce the burden of ventilator-associated lung injury in high-risk infants.

IVH (OR=5.926; P=0.028) was strongly associated with BPD, reflecting shared mechanisms of systemic inflammation, oxidative stress and vascular fragility (30,31). The interplay between brain and lung injury highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to managing extremely preterm infants, focusing on neuroprotection and minimizing invasive procedures that increase hemodynamic instability.

While CPAP and high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) were significant in univariate analysis, their effects did not remain significant in multivariate models. This may indicate that respiratory support modalities reflect underlying disease severity, rather than acting as direct predictors of BPD. Nonetheless, the judicious use of non-invasive ventilation and minimizing oxygen toxicity remain cornerstones of BPD prevention (32,33). CPAP is generally regarded as a protective modality that reduces ventilator-associated lung injure (34) In the present cohort, CPAP use was lower among infants who ultimately developed BPD, whereas escalation to HFOV was more frequent. This pattern most likely reflects baseline illness severity rather than a detrimental effect of CPAP: Infants with more severe initial respiratory compromise were less able to tolerate CPAP and required earlier escalation to invasive ventilation or HFOV. Thus, the observed group difference in respiratory support should be interpreted as a marker of underlying disease severity, consistent with prior reports showing that the choice of respiratory support modality typically reflects the infant's clinical acuity rather than functioning as an independent predictor of BPD (35,36).

NEC, a systemic inflammatory condition, was significant in the present univariate analysis, but lost significance in multivariate modeling. This result may reflect collinearity with sepsis and other variables. Nevertheless, the present findings align with previous research highlighting NEC as a driver of systemic inflammation and impaired lung development (15). Preventative measures, such as human milk feeding and probiotics, could have dual benefits for gut and lung health in preterm infants (37).

The nomogram constructed in the present study provides a user-friendly tool for bedside application. While some predictors in the final model, such as sepsis or HFOV use, were formally coded as occurring within the first 14 days, in the majority of cases, these events were clinically apparent or could be anticipated within the first 72 h after birth. For example, early-onset sepsis in preterm infants often manifests within the first 48 h, and the need for HFOV is typically determined during initial respiratory stabilization (38). As such, the model maintains its intended role for early risk stratification and timely intervention in clinical practice. By integrating gestational age, birth weight, sepsis, PDA and IVH, the model facilitates individualized risk stratification and enables timely interventions. Compared with earlier models that primarily relied on gestational age and birth weight (39,40), the present approach incorporates comorbidities, thus enhancing predictive accuracy. Importantly, the present study introduces several novel aspects: Unlike prior models that typically focused on gestational age and birth weight alone, the present nomogram integrates comorbidities such as sepsis, PDA and IVH, variables with high clinical relevance yet often excluded from earlier predictive tools. The development of a visually intuitive nomogram enhances practical usability, making the model more accessible for bedside application by clinicians. Moreover, to the best of our knowledge, this is one of the few studies conducted in Southwest China that has systematically developed and internally validated a BPD risk prediction model, thereby addressing a regional gap in neonatal research and contributing valuable insights to the global literature. Although birth weight and sex were not statistically significant in the present multivariate model, they were retained in the nomogram due to their strong clinical relevance and prior validation as BPD risk factors (41). Including such variables ensures clinical interpretability and aligns with accepted practices in predictive model development (42).

The present model's high AUC (0.918) surpasses benchmarks reported in similar studies (11), underscoring its robustness. Moreover, the calibration curve in the present study demonstrated excellent agreement between predicted and observed probabilities, thus ensuring reliability across various clinical settings. These strengths make the model particularly valuable for guiding early interventions, such as caffeine therapy, optimization of ventilation strategies and nutritional support (43).

The inclusion of these parameters significantly enhances predictive accuracy while maintaining applicability within the first 72 h of life in most cases. The comprehensive collection of maternal, neonatal and comorbid factors allowed for a thorough exploration of BPD risk determinants, while multivariate logistic regression ensured the identification of independent predictors. Furthermore, the application of bootstrapping for internal validation enhanced the reliability of the model and reduced the risk of overfitting. The visually intuitive nomogram bridges the gap between complex statistical models and bedside decision-making, facilitating rapid individualized risk estimation by clinicians.

However, certain limitations exhibited by the current study should be acknowledged. First, the model underwent only internal validation using bootstrapping without any external validation, which restricts its generalizability and positions it as a preliminary exploratory tool; external validation in diverse cohorts is necessary to confirm its applicability across different clinical environments. Furthermore, the ratio of BPD events (n=34) to the 11 candidate predictors initially entered into the multivariate model resulted in an events-per-variable ratio of ~3.1:1, which is below the commonly recommended threshold of 10:1(44). To minimize this risk, a stepwise backward elimination process was applied to retain only the most stable predictors and performed bootstrap internal validation to assess and adjust for optimism. This yielded a bias-corrected AUC of 0.902, which was only slightly lower than the apparent AUC, supporting the relative stability of the model. Nevertheless, external validation in larger, multi-center cohorts is essential to confirm the generalizability of the present findings. The retrospective design of the present study, despite meticulous data collection, is inherently prone to selection and information biases. Additionally, the current study was conducted in a single center with a relatively small sample size (n=120; BPD cases=34), which may limit statistical power and precluded more granular subgroup analyses by gestational age and birth weight categories. The relatively small number of events also means that some clinically important variables, such as birth weight and infant sex, did not reach statistical significance in multivariable analysis.

Future research should focus on addressing the limitations of the present study and further advancing the field of BPD risk prediction. Conducting multicenter, prospective studies with larger and more diverse populations will be essential to validate the current model externally and ensure its generalizability. Incorporating biomarkers such as peripheral blood cytokines (e.g., IL-6, IL-8) or molecular signatures identified through transcriptomic approaches may enhance the precision of the model and provide insights into the underlying mechanisms of BPD (45). Additionally, integrating advanced imaging techniques, such as lung ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging, may offer novel perspectives on disease progression and early risk stratification. Long-term follow-up studies are crucial to evaluate the predictive impact of the model on neurodevelopmental and respiratory outcomes, ensuring that early identification translates into improved quality of life for preterm infants. Finally, assessing the real-world clinical utility of the model, including its integration into electronic health records and decision-support systems, will determine its potential to optimize neonatal care and resource allocation.

Since only internal validation was performed, the present study should be regarded as a preliminary exploratory effort requiring future external validation to confirm its broader applicability. In the current study, a clinically meaningful preliminary risk prediction model for BPD in preterm infants was constructed. The inclusion criteria were intentionally broad (gestational age <32 weeks and birth weight ≤2,500 g) to ensure the applicability of the model to a wider range of preterm infants in routine clinical practice. Although this approach may include infants at relatively lower risk for BPD, it enhances the generalizability and relevance of the model in diverse neonatal care settings. While the model demonstrates strong discrimination and calibration, the relatively small sample size (n=120) and single-center design aspect of the current study may limit the generalizability of the present findings. Nevertheless, the use of readily accessible clinical predictors and the application of 1,000 bootstrap resamples for internal validation provide a reliable foundation for further model development. This exploratory analysis offers an important first step toward establishing a practical risk stratification tool. Although internal validation using 1,000 bootstrap resamples indicates strong model stability and reduces overfitting risk, the absence of external validation remains a key limitation of the present study. Without testing it on an independent cohort, the generalizability of the model across different populations and clinical practices cannot be fully ensured. Future research should therefore prioritize external validation through large-scale, multicenter, prospective studies to confirm the performance of the nomogram in broader settings. Establishing external credibility through future validation is essential for integrating this model into routine clinical practice and reinforcing its predictive value.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding: No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The data generated in the present study may be requested from the corresponding author.

Authors' contributions

YSP conceived and designed the study, and participated in data collection, statistical analysis and manuscript drafting. LX participated in data acquisition, interpretation of results and critical revision of the manuscript. WBD was responsible for data management, literature review and assisting in statistical analysis. JWD conceived and designed the study and critically revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. YSP and LX confirm the authenticity of all the raw data.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was conducted in accordance with The Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University (approval no. KY2025055). Due to the retrospective nature of the present study, the requirement for informed consent was waived by the ethics committee. All patient data were fully anonymized and utilized exclusively for research purposes.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Siffel C, Kistler KD, Lewis JFM and Sarda SP: Global incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia among extremely preterm infants: A systematic literature review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 34:1721–1731. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Perveen S, Chen CM, Sobajima H, Zhou X and Chen JY: Editorial: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia: Latest advances. Front Pediatr. 11(1303761)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Algarni SS, Ali K, Alsaif S, Aljuaid N, Alzahrani R, Albassam M, Alanazi R, Alqueflie D, Almutairi M, Alfrijan H, et al: Changes in the patterns of respiratory support and incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia; a single center experience. BMC Pediatr. 23(357)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Moreira A, Noronha M, Joy J, Bierwirth N, Tarriela A, Naqvi A, Zoretic S, Jones M, Marotta A, Valadie T, et al: Rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in very low birth weight neonates: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Respir Res. 25(219)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Dankhara N, Holla I, Ramarao S and Kalikkot Thekkeveedu R: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia: Pathogenesis and pathophysiology. J Clin Med. 12(4207)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Sikdar O, Harris C and Greenough A: Improving early diagnosis of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Expert Rev Respir Med. 18:283–294. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Abdelrazek AA, Kamel SM, Elbakry AAE and Elmazzahy EA: Lung ultrasound in early prediction of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in pre-term babies. J Ultrasound. 27:653–662. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Pérez-Tarazona S, Marset G, Part M, López C and Pérez-Lara L: Definitions of bronchopulmonary dysplasia: Which one should we use? J Pediatr. 251:67–73.e2. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Higgins RD, Jobe AH, Koso-Thomas M, Bancalari E, Viscardi RM, Hartert TV, Ryan RM, Kallapur SG, Steinhorn RH, Konduri GG, et al: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia: Executive summary of a workshop. J Pediatr. 197:300–308. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Sucasas Alonso A, Pértega Diaz S, Sáez Soto R and Avila-Alvarez A: Epidemiology and risk factors for bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants born at or less than 32 weeks of gestation. An Pediatr (Engl Ed). 96:242–251. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

He W, Zhang L, Feng R, Fang WH, Cao Y, Sun SQ, Shi P, Zhou JG, Tang LF, Zhang XB and Qi YY: Risk factors and machine learning prediction models for bronchopulmonary dysplasia severity in the Chinese population. World J Pediatr. 19:568–576. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Zhang H, Fang J, Su Q, et al: Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting bronchopulmonary dysplasia in very-low-birth-weight infants. Front Pediatr. 9(648828)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Sun X, Li L, He L, Wang S, Pan Z and Li D: Preoperative malnutrition predicts poor early immune recovery following gynecologic cancer surgery: A retrospective cohort study and risk nomogram development. Front Immunol. 16(1681762)2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Papile LA: The Apgar score in the 21st century. N Engl J Med. 344:519–520. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Hu X, Liang H, Li F, Zhang R, Zhu Y, Zhu X and Xu Y: Necrotizing enterocolitis: Current understanding of the prevention and management. Pediatr Surg Int. 40(32)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, Tiberti N, Lisacek F, Sanchez JC and Müller M: pROC: An open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics. 12(77)2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Zhang Z and Kattan MW: Drawing nomograms with R: Applications to categorical outcome and survival data. Ann Transl Med. 5(211)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Basnet K, Yadav BK, Khan SA, Bhattarai CD, Adhikari K, Bajgain A, Karki M and Yadav R: Birth weight status of newborns and its relationship with other anthropometric parameters. Medicine (Baltimore). 104(e45374)2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Maytasari GM, Haksari EL and Prawirohartono EP: Predictors of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in infants with birth weight less than 1500 g. Glob Pediatr Health. 10(2333794X231152199)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Wang L, Lin XZ, Shen W, Wu F, Mao J, Liu L, Chang YM, Zhang R, Ye XZ, Qiu YP, et al: Risk factors of extrauterine growth restriction in very preterm infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: A multi-center study in China. BMC Pediatr. 22(363)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Yoneda K, Seki T, Kawazoe Y, Ohe K and Takahashi N: Neonatal Research Network of Japan. Immediate postnatal prediction of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia among very preterm and very low birth weight infants based on gradient boosting decision trees algorithm: A nationwide database study in Japan. PLoS One. 19(e0300817)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Li L, Guo J, Wang Y, Yuan Y, Feng X, Gu X, Jiang S, Chen C, Cao Y, Sun J, et al: Association of neonatal outcome with birth weight for gestational age in Chinese very preterm infants: A retrospective cohort study. Ital J Pediatr. 50(203)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Qiao X, Yin J, Zheng Z, Li L and Feng X: Endothelial cell dynamics in sepsis-induced acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: Pathogenesis and therapeutic implications. Cell Commun Signal. 22(241)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Gong T, Wang QD, Loughran PA, Li YH, Scott MJ, Billiar TR, Liu YT and Fan J: Mechanism of lactic acidemia-promoted pulmonary endothelial cells death in sepsis: role for CIRP-ZBP1-PANoptosis pathway. Mil Med Res. 11(71)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Deng L, Xie W, Lin M, Xiong D, Huang L, Zhang X, Qian R, Huang X, Tang S and Liu W: Taraxerone inhibits M1 polarization and alleviates sepsis-induced acute lung injury by activating SIRT1. Chin Med. 19(159)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Xu Y, Xin J, Sun Y, Wang X, Sun L, Zhao F, Niu C and Liu S: Mechanisms of sepsis-induced acute lung injury and advancements of natural small molecules in its treatment. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 17(472)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Mižíková I and Thébaud B: Perinatal origins of bronchopulmonary dysplasia-deciphering normal and impaired lung development cell by cell. Mol Cell Pediatr. 10(4)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

28 

El-Khuffash A, Mullaly R and McNamara PJ: Patent ductus arteriosus, bronchopulmonary dysplasia and pulmonary hypertension-a complex conundrum with many phenotypes? Pediatr Res. 94:416–417. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Villamor E, van Westering-Kroon E, Gonzalez-Luis GE, Bartoš F, Abman SH and Huizing MJ: Patent ductus arteriosus and bronchopulmonary dysplasia-associated pulmonary hypertension: A bayesian meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 6(e2345299)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

30 

Faro DC, Di Pino FL and Monte IP: Inflammation, oxidative stress, and endothelial dysfunction in the pathogenesis of vascular damage: Unraveling novel cardiovascular risk factors in fabry disease. Int J Mol Sci. 25(8273)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Panda P, Verma HK, Lakkakula S, Merchant N, Kadir F, Rahman S, Jeffree MS, Lakkakula BVKS and Rao PV: Biomarkers of oxidative stress tethered to cardiovascular diseases. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022(9154295)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Shahzad T, Dong Y, Behnke NK, Brandner J, Hilgendorff A, Chao CM, Behnke J, Bellusci S and Ehrhardt H: Anti-CCL2 therapy reduces oxygen toxicity to the immature lung. Cell Death Discov. 10(311)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Behnke J, Dippel CM, Choi Y, Rekers L, Schmidt A, Lauer T, Dong Y, Behnke J, Zimmer KP, Bellusci S and Ehrhardt H: Oxygen toxicity to the immature lung-part II: The unmet clinical need for causal therapy. Int J Mol Sci. 22(10694)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

34 

Kaltsogianni O, Dassios T and Greenough A: Neonatal respiratory support strategies-short and long-term respiratory outcomes. Front Pediatr. 11(1212074)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

35 

Ramaswamy VV, Devi R and Kumar G: Non-invasive ventilation in neonates: A review of current literature. Front Pediatr. 11(1248836)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

36 

Dou C, Yu YH, Zhuo QC, Qi JH, Huang L, Ding YJ, Yang DJ, Li L, Li D, Wang XK, et al: Longer duration of initial invasive mechanical ventilation is still a crucial risk factor for moderate-to-severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia in very preterm infants: A multicentrer prospective study. World J Pediatr. 19:577–585. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

37 

Sjödin KS, Sjödin A, Ruszczyński M, Kristensen MB, Hernell O, Szajewska H and West CE: Targeting the gut-lung axis by synbiotic feeding to infants in a randomized controlled trial. BMC Biol. 21(38)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

38 

Tana M, Tirone C, Aurilia C, Lio A, Paladini A, Fattore S, Esposito A, De Tomaso D and Vento G: Respiratory management of the preterm infant: Supporting evidence-based practice at the bedside. Children (Basel). 10(535)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

39 

Jassem-Bobowicz JM, Klasa-Mazurkiewicz D, Żawrocki A, Stefańska K, Domżalska-Popadiuk I, Kwiatkowski S and Preis K: Prediction Model for bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm newborns. Children (Basel). 8(886)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

40 

Yin J, Liu L, Li H, Hou X, Chen J, Han S and Chen X: Mechanical ventilation characteristics and their prediction performance for the risk of moderate and severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia in infants with gestational age <30 weeks and birth weight <1,500 g. Front Pediatr. 10(993167)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

41 

Huang LY, Lin TI, Lin CH, Yang SN, Chen WJ, Wu CY, Liu HK, Wu PL, Suen JL, Chen JS and Yang YN: Comprehensive analysis of risk factors for bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants in Taiwan: A four-year study. Children (Basel). 10(1822)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

42 

Efthimiou O, Seo M, Chalkou K, Debray T, Egger M and Salanti G: Developing clinical prediction models: A step-by-step guide. BMJ. 386(e078276)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

43 

Oliphant EA, Hanning SM, McKinlay CJD and Alsweiler JM: Caffeine for apnea and prevention of neurodevelopmental impairment in preterm infants: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Perinatol. 44:785–801. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

44 

Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR and Feinstein AR: A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 49:1373–1379. 1996.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

45 

Luo L, Luo F, Wu C, Zhang H, Jiang Q, He S, Li W, Zhang W, Cheng Y, Yang P, et al: Identification of potential biomarkers in the peripheral blood of neonates with bronchopulmonary dysplasia using WGCNA and machine learning algorithms. Medicine (Baltimore). 103(e37083)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

  • Abstract
  • View
  • Download
  • Twitter
Copy and paste a formatted citation
Spandidos Publications style
Pan Y, Xiao L, Dong W and Dang J: Development and internal validation of a clinical nomogram for predicting bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants. Exp Ther Med 31: 50, 2026.
APA
Pan, Y., Xiao, L., Dong, W., & Dang, J. (2026). Development and internal validation of a clinical nomogram for predicting bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 31, 50. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2025.13045
MLA
Pan, Y., Xiao, L., Dong, W., Dang, J."Development and internal validation of a clinical nomogram for predicting bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 31.2 (2026): 50.
Chicago
Pan, Y., Xiao, L., Dong, W., Dang, J."Development and internal validation of a clinical nomogram for predicting bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 31, no. 2 (2026): 50. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2025.13045
Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Pan Y, Xiao L, Dong W and Dang J: Development and internal validation of a clinical nomogram for predicting bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants. Exp Ther Med 31: 50, 2026.
APA
Pan, Y., Xiao, L., Dong, W., & Dang, J. (2026). Development and internal validation of a clinical nomogram for predicting bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 31, 50. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2025.13045
MLA
Pan, Y., Xiao, L., Dong, W., Dang, J."Development and internal validation of a clinical nomogram for predicting bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 31.2 (2026): 50.
Chicago
Pan, Y., Xiao, L., Dong, W., Dang, J."Development and internal validation of a clinical nomogram for predicting bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 31, no. 2 (2026): 50. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2025.13045
Follow us
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
About
  • Spandidos Publications
  • Careers
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
How can we help?
  • Help
  • Live Chat
  • Contact
  • Email to our Support Team