Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Oncology Letters
      • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • Information for Authors
    • Information for Reviewers
    • Information for Librarians
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Reviewers
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Login Register Submit
  • This site uses cookies
  • You can change your cookie settings at any time by following the instructions in our Cookie Policy. To find out more, you may read our Privacy Policy.

    I agree
Search articles by DOI, keyword, author or affiliation
Search
Advanced Search
presentation
International Journal of Functional Nutrition
Join Editorial Board Propose a Special Issue
Print ISSN: 2634-7989 Online ISSN: 2634-7237
Journal Cover
January-December 2025 Volume 6 Issue 1

Full Size Image

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

Journals

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.

Molecular Medicine Reports

Molecular Medicine Reports

Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.

Biomedical Reports

Biomedical Reports

Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.

World Academy of Sciences Journal

World Academy of Sciences Journal

Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.

International Journal of Epigenetics

International Journal of Epigenetics

Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.

Medicine International

Medicine International

An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.

Journal Cover
January-December 2025 Volume 6 Issue 1

Full Size Image

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

  • Article
  • Citations
    • Cite This Article
    • Download Citation
    • Create Citation Alert
    • Remove Citation Alert
    • Cited By
  • Similar Articles
    • Related Articles (in Spandidos Publications)
    • Similar Articles (Google Scholar)
    • Similar Articles (PubMed)
  • Download PDF
  • Download XML
  • View XML
Article Open Access

Pectins extracted from prunes (Prunus domestica L.) inhibit the invasive capacity of melanoma cells

  • Authors:
    • Amanda Plaça Bialli
    • Suelen Cristina Soares Baal
    • Rafaella Fernanda Angeli
    • Gabriel De Oliveira Franco
    • Felipe Figueiredo Weirich
    • Luiz Cláudio Fernandes
    • Lucimara Mach Côrtes Cordeiro
    • Katya Naliwaiko
    • Marcia Helena Appel
    • Fabíola Iagher
  • View Affiliations / Copyright

    Affiliations: Department of Physiology, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná 81530‑000, Brazil, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná 81530‑000, Brazil, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná 81530‑000, Brazil, Department of Structural Biology, Molecular and Genetics, State University of Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Paraná 84030‑900, Brazil
    Copyright: © Bialli et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY 4.0].
  • Article Number: 9
    |
    Published online on: September 26, 2025
       https://doi.org/10.3892/ijfn.2025.50
  • Expand metrics +
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

This article is mentioned in:



Abstract

Fruit‑derived pectins exhibit notable biological effects, particularly against tumor cells. Consequently, natural products have become a major focus in the search for novel anticancer agents with fewer side‑effects. The present study evaluated the effects of a pectic fraction extracted from prunes (dried fruits of Prunus domestica), a species cultivated worldwide, on B16F10 cells. The prune pectic fraction obtained with hot water (PWH) reduced the viability of B16F10 murine melanoma cells, while leaving normal BALB/c 3T3 cells unaffected, indicating lower cytotoxicity than the chemotherapeutic drug, doxorubicin. At concentrations of 10 and 100 µg/ml, PWH specifically inhibited B16F10 cell viability by 24 and 40%, respectively, reduced colony formation by 20 and 26%, respectively, and decreased cytoplasmic extensions by 30% at 100 µg/ml. Furthermore, FAK gene expression increased by 57 and 200%, suggesting a compensatory response to mitigate the cell area loss. Collectively, these results underscore the potential of PWH for further cancer research.

Introduction

Cancer remains one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide, with the number of new cases rising each year. Chemotherapy, although a mainstay in cancer treatment, is associated with high toxicity and significant side-effects. This approach targets not only tumor cells, but also healthy cells, resulting in severe adverse outcomes such as nausea, fatigue, organ damage and immune suppression. These effects often necessitate treatment interruption, thereby compromising therapeutic efficacy (1). Furthermore, the development of resistance to chemotherapeutic agents remains a major challenge in cancer treatment (2). These limitations underscore the need for alternative adjuvant therapies capable of exerting antitumor effects without inducing toxicity, thereby allowing for reduced dosage and/or duration of conventional chemotherapy without compromising efficacy. Natural compound-based therapies have shown promise as complementary strategies that improve the quality of life of patients and support uninterrupted treatment.

Brazil harbors a vast biodiversity of plants containing natural bioactive compounds with a high biotechnological potential for the pharmaceutical industry. Among these, a wide variety of plant-derived polysaccharides have attracted considerable attention for their immunomodulatory and antitumor properties. Pectins, a family of covalently linked D-galacturonic acid-rich polysaccharides abundant in the primary cell walls of fruits, exhibit diverse biological activities, including anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, immunoregulatory and antitumor effects, and may also serve as carriers for targeted drug delivery (3). In numerous fruits, pectic polysaccharide structures undergo chemical and enzymatic modifications during ripening, leading to substantial intramolecular changes in the pectic chain (4). Pectins derived from diverse biological sources are known to exhibit considerable structural variability, and such differences in chemical composition have been associated with distinct biological activities. Notably, accumulating evidence indicates that pectins may exert antitumor effects through the modulation of tumor cell proliferation, adhesion and apoptosis (3). Pectin derived from papaya has been shown to reduce the viability and induce the necroptosis of colon and prostate cancer cell lines (5). Previous studies have demonstrated that pectic polysaccharides extracted from potatoes (6) and sugar beet (7) significantly inhibited the proliferation of HT-29 cells in vitro. Furthermore, apple pectin has been reported to promote the apoptosis and reduce the adhesion of 4T1 breast cancer cells (8). Notably, pectins display low toxicity and minimal side-effects on normal cells compared to conventional chemotherapeutic agents (9). These properties highlight pectins as molecules with potential to serve as adjuvants in cancer therapy, exerting antitumor effects and potentially enabling a reduction in the use of chemotherapeutic agents associated with severe side effects.

Prunes are the dried fruits of Prunus domestica L. (European plum; P. domestica), a tree cultivated on all continents, with its fruits widely consumed worldwide (10). Pectins extracted from P. domestica fruits have been reported to exhibit antioxidant (11), gastroprotective (12,13) and anti-inflammatory activities (14). Recently, Vaz da Luz et al (15) demonstrated that isolated side chains of pectins (type I arabinogalactans) with different molar masses, obtained from prune tea infusions, displayed varying antitumor effects. However, unlike the study by Vaz da Luz et al (15), the present study aimed to evaluate the antitumor activity of pectins present in the prune pectic fraction obtained with hot water (PWH), which consists of a mixture of rhamnogalacturonans with type I arabinogalactan side chains and low-methyl-esterified homogalacturonan (13). It is well-established that a mixture of pectic polysaccharides in solution can elicit different biological effects compared to those produced by individual polysaccharide chains (4). To the best of our knowledge, the antitumor activity of pectins in the PWH fraction has not been previously investigated, which justifies the present investigation.

In light of the above, the present study aimed to evaluate the antitumor activity of the PWH fraction obtained from prunes in B16F10 murine melanoma cells. The present study assessed its cytotoxicity on both tumor and normal cells, as well as its effects on tumor cell migration, colony formation and morphology.

Materials and methods

Purification, characterization and solubilization of polysaccharide fraction

The prune pectin fraction (PWH) was characterized and kindly provided by the Department of Biochemistry at the Federal University of Paraná (Paraná, Brazil). Pitted prunes (dried fruits from P. domestica purchased at a local market in Curitiba, Brazil; LA VIOLETERA®) were freeze-dried and milled. The extraction of pectic polysaccharides was carried out using hot water in order to obtain the molecules more tightly bound to the cell wall. Moreover, hot-water extraction results in a higher pectin yield compared to cold-water extraction. The water extract was obtained by filtration, and the polysaccharides were recovered by ethanol (3 vol.) precipitation and lyophilization, originating the fractions. A homogeneous fraction was analyzed by sugar composition, high-performance steric exclusion chromatography, methylation, and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy analyses. The PWH comprises rhamnogalacturonans with type I arabinogalactans as side chains, and low-methyl esterified homogalacturonan (9). The freeze-dried pectin fraction was solubilized in the cell growth medium [RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and 1% antibiotic (penicillin 10,000 U and streptomycin 10 mg/l), MilliporeSigma] and stored at -20˚C until its use.

Cell groups were divided into a control group (CT) and a group treated with prune pectins (PWH). The control group received only the cell growth medium without PWH. For cytotoxicity analysis, doxorubicin (DX, Pfizer®) at a concentration of 2.5 µg/ml was used as a positive control. In this case, the same control medium was used, supplemented with the chemotherapy drug.

Cell lines and cell culture

The B16F10 murine melanoma cell line (BCRJ, 0046) and BALB/c 3T3 normal cell line (clone A31, ATCC, CCL-163) were kindly provided by the Laboratory of Inflammatory and Neoplastic Cells, Department of Cell Biology, UFPR, Curitiba, Brazil, and were initiated and maintained according to specific recommendations for each line. The BALB/c 3T3 cell line, derived from fibroblasts of BALB/c mouse embryos, is non-tumorigenic and widely employed as a representative model of normal cells in contrast to tumor cell lines. Given that fibroblasts are distributed throughout the body, this lineage provides an appropriate model for assessing normal cell function in studies of viability and cytotoxicity. Cells were cultured in growth medium and maintained in an incubator (Sanyo Scientific MCO-18AC) at 37˚C, 90% humidity, and 5% CO2 for 72 h. All experiments were performed in biological triplicates.

Analysis of cell viability

To determine the concentrations to be used in the present study, a cell viability and cytotoxicity test was carried out to determine the concentrations that were not cytotoxic to normal cells. For this, the colorimetric tests of reduction of diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) and neutral red (NR) were performed by the protocols proposed by Mosmann (16) and Repetto et al (17), respectively. The B16F10 cells (5x102 cells/well) and BALB/c 3T3 (2x103 cells/well) were exposed to 0, 2.5, 5, 10, 100 and 800 µg/ml PWH, and 2.5 µg/ml DX for 72 h. Briefly, the MTT cell viability assay was performed by first seeding the cells into 96-well plates and treating them as described in the experimental design. Following treatment, the wells were aspirated to remove the culture medium (RPMI-1640, MilliporeSigma; containing fetal bovine serum 10% Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), and 100 µl MTT solution [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide 5 mg/ml in PBS, MilliporeSigma, pH 7.4] were added to each well. The plates were incubated for 3.5 h at 37˚C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 to allow the formation of formazan crystals by metabolically active cells. Following incubation, the MTT solution was discarded, and 100 µl dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, MilliporeSigma) were added to each well to solubilize the formazan crystals. The plates were gently shaken to ensure complete solubilization, and the absorbance was measured at 540 nm using a microplate reader (TECAN® Infinite M200; Tecan Group, Ltd.). The absorbance values obtained were directly proportional to the number of viable cells.

The neutral red cell viability assay was performed by first treating cells cultured in 96-well plates according to the experimental protocol. Following treatment, the medium (RPMI-1640, MilliporeSigma; containing fetal bovine serum 10% Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was removed, and 100 µl Neutral Red solution (MilliporeSigma, 40 µg/ml in culture medium) were added to each well. The cells were then incubated for 3 h at 37˚C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere to allow dye uptake by viable cells. Following incubation, the dye solution was removed, and the cells were washed gently with 150 µl PBS (MilliporeSigma) to eliminate excess dye. Subsequently, 100 µl destaining solution (50% ethanol, 49% distilled water, and 1% glacial acetic acid, MilliporeSigma) was added to each well to extract the dye from the lysosomes. The plate was shaken until the complete solubilization of the dye, and the absorbance was measured at 540 nm using a microplate reader (TECAN® Infinite M200). The absorbance values obtained were directly proportional to the number of viable cells. The results obtained from the MTT and neutral red assays (measured by absorbance) were converted into percentages, using the control group (without treatment with the PWH fraction) as having 100% viability.

Cytotoxicity assay

The assay was performed through the crystal violet method, as previously described by Bonnekoh et al (18). The B16F10 cells (2x103 cells/well) were plated in a new 96-well plate and exposed to 0, 10 and 100 µg/ml PWH. Cell viability was measured in 24, 48 and 72 h. Following the treatment period, the medium (RPMI-1640 MilliporeSigma; containing fetal bovine serum 10% Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was removed, and the cells were gently washed with 150 µl PBS to eliminate non-adherent cells and debris. Subsequently, 100 µl of 4% paraformaldehyde solution (MilliporeSigma) were added to each well to fix the cells for 20 min at room temperature. Following fixation, the wells were washed again with PBS, and 100 µl 0.1% crystal violet solution (prepared in 20% methanol, Merck KGaA) were added to stain the cells at room temperature for 10 min. Excess dye was removed by rinsing the plate under running distilled water until the background was clear. After drying, the bound dye was solubilized by the addition of 100 µl 10% acetic acid (MilliporeSigma) to each well. The plate was gently shaken to ensure complete solubilization. The results were obtained using a TECAN® Infinite M200 device at 590 nm. The data are presented as a percentage relative to the CT group at 24 h.

Cell migration (wound healing) assay

Following 72 h of exposure to 0, 10 and 100 µg/ml PWH, the B16F10 surviving cells were plated again (2x104 cells/well) in a new 96-well plate with culture medium (RPMI-1640 MilliporeSigma; containing fetal bovine serum 10% Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) to perform the cell migration assay (‘scratch’ method) (19). Briefly, after the cells reached full confluency, cell proliferation was inhibited with the use of RPMI growth medium lacking in FBS (1%), and a straight scratch was made in the monolayer using a sterile 200 µl pipette tip. The wells were then gently washed with PBS to remove detached cells. Images of the scratch area were captured immediately (0 h) and following 24 h of incubation at 37˚C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere using an inverted microscope (BIOVAL® XDS-1B). The wound closure area was analyzed using ImageJ® software 1.52 (National Institutes of Health), and the migration rate was expressed as the percentage of area covered by cells after 24 h compared to time 0(20).

Colony formation assay

Following 72 h of exposure to 0, 10 and 100 µg/ml PWH, B16F10 surviving cells were plated again at a reduced concentration (1x102 cells/well) in a 24-well plate to perform the colony formation assay analyses (21). This assay is expected to evaluate the ability of a single cell to form new colonies. For this, surviving cells were maintained only in the growth medium (RPMI-1640 MilliporeSigma; containing fetal bovine serum 10% Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and incubated at 37˚C for 96 h. At the end of the incubation period, the colonies were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 15 min and then stained with 0.1% crystal violet solution (prepared in 20% methanol) for 10 min at room temperature. Excess dye was washed off with distilled water, and the plates were dried in air. The images were acquired using an inverted microscope (BIOVAL® XDS-1B), and colonies containing >50 cells were counted using ImageJ® software 1.52 (National Institutes of Health).

Analysis of cell morphology

This assay aimed to evaluate morphological changes in B16F10 cells following exposure to the PWH fraction. The cells (5x10³ cells/well) were seeded in 24-well plates and treated with 0, 10, or 100 µg/ml PWH. Cell morphology was assessed at the start of treatment and again after 24 h. At each time point, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 10 min and stained with 0.25% crystal violet (prepared in methanol) at room temperature for 10 min (22). The area occupied by the cells in culture was quantified through digital analysis of images captured using a light microscope (BIOVAL® XDS-1B) at x400 magnification. Images were processed using ImageJ software 1.52 (National Institutes of Health), applying threshold-based segmentation to differentiate cells from the background. The total cell area was subsequently measured in pixels.

Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)

RNA isolation from the B16F10 cell samples following 72 h of PWH treatment was performed using TRIzol® reagent (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The extracted RNA samples were then converted to cDNA using the iScript Reverse Transcription Supermix for RT-qPCR kit (cat. no. 1708841, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). The reactions were taken to the thermocycler (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), and the samples were incubated in three cycles: 1st cycle of 5 min at 25˚C, 2nd cycle of 20 min at 46˚C, and 3rd cycle of 1 min at 95˚C. The RT-qPCR reaction was performed using the one-step RT-PCR SYBR®-Green kit (cat. no. 1725270, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) and the appropriate primers for each reaction, as follows: Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) forward, 5'-TCTGTGGAATTGGCAATCGG-3' and reverse, 5'-TGGATGGTCTGCACTTGGTT-3'; beta actin (ACTB) forward, 5'-CTGTATTCCCCTCCATCGTG-3' and reverse, 5'-GGGTCAGGATACCTCTCTTGC-3'; hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT1) forward, 5'-GTTGGGCTTACCTCACTGCT-3' and reverse, 5'-TAATCACGACGCTGGGACTG-3'. The samples were analyzed in a QuantStudioTM 5 device (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). For each reaction, a control RT (without conversion of RNA to cDNA) was performed. The relative quantification was measured according to the pre-set threshold fluorescence level of the target gene (FAK) compared to the endogenous controls used (ACTB and HPRT1). ACTB and HPRT1 were utilized for normalization. The quality and purity of total RNA were evaluated using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Samples exhibited A260/A280 ratios between 1.8 and 2.0 and A260/A230 ratios >1.8, indicating minimal contamination by proteins or phenolic compounds and falling within commonly accepted parameters for gene expression analysis. For each RT-qPCR reaction, 4.5 µl cDNA, synthesized from a standardized RNA concentration of 10 ng/µl, was used, corresponding to 45 ng total RNA per reaction. The assay performance was monitored using two endogenous reference genes (ACTB and HPRT1), selected for their stability across the analyzed Mus musculus samples. No-reverse transcriptase (RT-) controls were included to confirm the absence of genomic DNA contamination. Each sample was tested in triplicate, and the relative gene levels were normalized using the 2-ΔΔCq method (23).

Statistical analysis

The normal distribution of values was verified using the Shapiro-Wilk test. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test was performed in all analyses, apart from cell proliferation, which was analyzed using two-way ANOVA (mixed model) followed by the Bonferroni post hoc test, both through GraphPad Prism8 Software® (Dotmatics). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. Tukey's test was used as a post hoc test. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments.

Results

Cell viability

In the NR assay, all PWH concentrations significantly reduced the viability of the B16F10 cells compared with the CT group (Fig. 1A). In the BALB/c 3T3 cells, a significant reduction was observed only following treatment with 2.5 and 800 µg/ml PWH in relation to the CT group (Fig. 1B). The MTT assay revealed a similar viability profile for the B16F10 cells as in the NR assay (Fig. 1C). In the BALB/c 3T3 cells, cytotoxicity was detected only following treatment with 800 µg/ml PWH, although it remained lower than that induced by DX (Fig. 1D). Overall, PWH was less cytotoxic than DX across all concentrations and assays (Fig. 1A-C), apart from the concentration of 800 µg/ml in the NR assay (Fig. 1A). These assays suggest that the PWH fraction exhibits greater cytotoxicity toward tumor cells than toward normal cells.

Cell viability of tumor (B16F10) and
normal (BALB/c 3T3) cells, expressed as a percentage relative to
the control group (CT) and positive control group (DX) after 72 h
of polysaccharide treatment. (A) B16F10 cells assessed using the
neutral red method; (B) BALB/c 3T3 cells assessed using the neutral
red method; (C) B16F10 cells assessed using the MTT method; (D)
BALB/c 3T3 cells assessed using the MTT method. Results represent
at least three biologically independent experiments analyzed using
one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test. Data are presented as the
mean ± SD. *P<0.05, significant differences relative
to the CT group; #P<0.05, significant differences
relative to the DX group. CT, control; DX, doxorubicin.

Figure 1

Cell viability of tumor (B16F10) and normal (BALB/c 3T3) cells, expressed as a percentage relative to the control group (CT) and positive control group (DX) after 72 h of polysaccharide treatment. (A) B16F10 cells assessed using the neutral red method; (B) BALB/c 3T3 cells assessed using the neutral red method; (C) B16F10 cells assessed using the MTT method; (D) BALB/c 3T3 cells assessed using the MTT method. Results represent at least three biologically independent experiments analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. *P<0.05, significant differences relative to the CT group; #P<0.05, significant differences relative to the DX group. CT, control; DX, doxorubicin.

Cytotoxicity assay

Based on the cell viability data, concentrations were selected to avoid cytotoxic effects on normal cells while effectively reducing tumor cell viability. Subsequent experiments were performed using 10 and 100 µg/ml PWH, with the control (CT) group remaining polysaccharide-free (0 µg/ml). The results demonstrated the cytotoxicity of the PWH fraction on tumor cells over time. PWH did not significantly affect cell viability at 24 or 48 h compared to the CT group. However, after 72 h, viability was markedly reduced at both concentrations, with decreases of 23.6 and 40.3%, respectively (Fig. 2).

B16F10 cell proliferation over 72 h
of treatment. The percentage of proliferation was calculated
relative to the 24-h results. Data represent at least three
biologically independent experiments analyzed using two-way ANOVA
(mixed model) followed by the Bonferroni post hoc test, and are
expressed as the mean ± SD. *P<0.05 and
**P<0.01.

Figure 2

B16F10 cell proliferation over 72 h of treatment. The percentage of proliferation was calculated relative to the 24-h results. Data represent at least three biologically independent experiments analyzed using two-way ANOVA (mixed model) followed by the Bonferroni post hoc test, and are expressed as the mean ± SD. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01.

Cell migration and colony formation capacity

In the migration assay, tumor cells treated with the PWH fraction closed the scratch to a similar extent as untreated cells, indicating that PWH did not significantly impair cell migration at either concentration within 24 h (Fig. 3A).

B16F10 cell migration and colony
formation capacity. (A) The graph represents the percentage of slot
invasion by cells previously treated with polysaccharide for 72 h,
with corresponding images captured immediately after the scratch
and 24 h later. (B) The number of colonies formed after 72 h of
polysaccharide treatment and 96 h post-replating. Results are based
on at least three biologically independent experiments analyzed
using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test. Data are presented as
the mean ± SD. **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001,
significant differences compared to the CT. CT, control.

Figure 3

B16F10 cell migration and colony formation capacity. (A) The graph represents the percentage of slot invasion by cells previously treated with polysaccharide for 72 h, with corresponding images captured immediately after the scratch and 24 h later. (B) The number of colonies formed after 72 h of polysaccharide treatment and 96 h post-replating. Results are based on at least three biologically independent experiments analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001, significant differences compared to the CT. CT, control.

By contrast, PWH effectively reduced colony formation at both concentrations. Compared to the CT group, the number of new colonies decreased by 19.6% in the cells treated with 10 µg/ml PWH and by 25.9% in those exposed to 100 µg/ml PWH (Fig. 3B). These data indicated that tumor cells exhibited a reduced proliferation and diminished colony formation capacity following treatment with PWH.

Area occupied by cultured cells

Morphological changes were observed in the cells exposed to PWH under an inverted microscope. To confirm and further investigate these changes, a detailed morphological analysis was performed. Immediately after treatment (0 h), no noticeable differences were detected between the treated and control cells (Fig. 4A). However, following 24 h of exposure, the cells treated with 100 µg/ml PWH exhibited a 30% reduction in the area occupied by cultured cells compared to the control group (Fig. 4B), suggesting that contact with the polysaccharides in the PWH fraction interfered with the cytoskeletal organization of tumor cells.

(A) Area occupied by cultured cells
(pixels) at the time of PWH exposure. (B) Area occupied by cultured
cells (pixels) 24 h after PWH exposure. Results represent at least
three biologically independent experiments analyzed using one-way
ANOVA followed by Tukey's test. Data are presented as the mean ±
SD. **P<0.01, significant differences compared to the
CT. CT, control; PWH, prune pectic fraction obtained with hot
water.

Figure 4

(A) Area occupied by cultured cells (pixels) at the time of PWH exposure. (B) Area occupied by cultured cells (pixels) 24 h after PWH exposure. Results represent at least three biologically independent experiments analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. **P<0.01, significant differences compared to the CT. CT, control; PWH, prune pectic fraction obtained with hot water.

RT-qPCR

Based on the observed effects on cell proliferation, colony formation and morphology, it was hypothesized that PWH may influence the focal adhesion points of cells. To determine this, FAK gene expression was quantified. FAK is a central regulator that promotes focal adhesion to the extracellular matrix and cytoskeletal remodeling. The results revealed the altered expression of the FAK gene in the B16F10 cells treated with PWH, with a 57% increase at the concentration of 10 µg/ml and a 3-fold increase at the concentration of 100 µg/ml (Fig. 5).

FAK relative gene expression in
B16F10 cells over 72 h of treatment. RT-qPCR analysis was performed
on at least three biologically independent experiments and
evaluated using one-way ANOVA. Data are presented as the mean ± SD.
*P<0.05 and ***P<0.001, significant
differences compared to the CT. CT, control; FAK, focal adhesion
kinase.

Figure 5

FAK relative gene expression in B16F10 cells over 72 h of treatment. RT-qPCR analysis was performed on at least three biologically independent experiments and evaluated using one-way ANOVA. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. *P<0.05 and ***P<0.001, significant differences compared to the CT. CT, control; FAK, focal adhesion kinase.

Discussion

The results of the present study demonstrated that PWH exerted specific effects on B16F10 cells, including reduced viability, decreased colony formation, fewer cytoplasmic extensions and an altered FAK gene expression. These changes are closely linked to melanoma differentiation and invasiveness (24-26). Even the lowest concentration of PWH (2.5 µg/ml) was sufficient to reduce B16F10 cell viability following 72 h of treatment. From a pharmacological perspective, the ability to decrease cancer cell viability at low concentrations are highly desirable (27). It was also observed that the reduction in cell viability was similar at both low and high concentrations, a phenomenon previously reported in studies involving pectins (28). Notably, the effect of PWH on normal cell viability was substantially lower than that of DX, consistent with other reports highlighting the low toxicity of pectins (29,30).

Cell cytotoxicity assays over time are essential for understanding the mechanisms of action of any proposed treatment. In the present study, a concentration-dependent reduction in tumor cell viability was observed after 72 h of exposure to PWH. Similar effects of pectins on tumor cell cultures have been reported in other studies (5,31,32). Of note, despite the 10-fold difference between the lowest and highest PWH concentrations (10 and 100 µg/ml), the effect on B16F10 cell viability was not proportionally greater at the higher concentration. This suggests that the impact of the PWH fraction on cell viability may reach a plateau beyond a certain concentration, indicating that the cellular pathways involved are already fully modulated, and increasing the concentration to 100 µg/ml does not further enhance the response. Indeed, a similar non-proportional reduction in viability with increasing concentrations of a comparable polysaccharide fraction has been reported previously (33).

Pectins from various sources have been reported to reduce tumor cell migration (34,35), including the migration of B16F10 cells (36). In contrast, in the present study, treatment with PWH did not produce significant changes in the migration rate of B16F10 cells. Nevertheless, the potential effect of the polysaccharides on cell migration cannot be ruled out, as the present study focused solely on migration at 0 and 24 h after scratch creation, which may have overlooked any early delays in movement immediately following the ‘wound’. Additionally, employing alternative techniques to evaluate migratory capacity could provide further insights.

The process of metastasis involves not only the ability of cells to migrate, but also the capacity of a single cell to proliferate and form a new colony in a tissue different from its primary origin. Studies investigating the effects of polysaccharides on tumor cell colony formation have reported promising results (37,38). These findings are consistent with those of the present study, in which PWH significantly reduced colony formation at its highest concentration (100 µg/ml).

In the present study, PWH at 100 µg/ml reduced the cytoplasmic area of B16F10 cells. Since cell-cell contact is a key mechanism for proliferation, the reduction in cell area and dendritic projections may lead to decreased release of critical growth factors necessary for sustaining cell proliferation (39). Furthermore, the data presented herein indicated that exposure to PWH was associated with a reduced cell area alongside increased FAK gene expression in B16F10 murine melanoma cells. Cytoskeletal reorganization plays a crucial role in the adaptation of a cell to specific exogenous stimuli or inhibitors present in the surrounding microenvironment. Consequently, the signaling proteins involved in this reorganization are essential for maintaining cell morphology and regulating biophysical dynamics (40). Focal adhesion sites are specialized regions where the cytoskeleton connects with the extracellular matrix (ECM). These sites rely on the coordinated activity of integrins, the cytoskeleton and signaling proteins, such as FAK and Src. They are essential for maintaining cellular architecture and sensing mechanical cues from the environment. The FAK-Src pathway can be activated by various signals involved in cell survival, invasion and adhesion. FAK is a central regulator of tumor cell motility and invasiveness. Upon activation, via integrin-ECM interactions or growth factor signaling, FAK autophosphorylates at Tyr397 and recruits Src kinases, promoting focal adhesion turnover and cytoskeletal remodeling through targets such as paxillin, p130Cas and Rho GTPases. FAK signaling also enhances MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression, supporting extracellular matrix degradation and invasion, and contributes to invadopodia formation and EMT-like phenotypes in melanoma (25,41). Notably, research has shown that an increased FAK expression is directly associated with heightened cancer aggressiveness (42), which is in contrast to the findings of the present study. However, it was hypothesized that the pectins present in PWH may impair cell adhesion to the surrounding environment. This could explain why, unable to adhere efficiently to their microenvironment, the cells remodel their cytoskeleton and display a reduced morphology compared to the control group. Consequently, in the absence of optimal adhesion and spreading, a compensatory mechanism may be triggered, leading cells to upregulate FAK in an attempt to form additional focal adhesion points for survival. Further detailed investigations of the mechanisms involved in the FAK-Src signaling pathway are required to clarify these findings.

The present study has certain limitations which should be mentioned. The analysis of additional genes related to cell proliferation and migration/invasion, as well as their corresponding protein expression, was not performed here and should be addressed in future work.

In conclusion, the pectins from prunes present in the PWH fraction reduced the viability of B16F10 murine melanoma cells, while exhibiting minimal toxicity toward normal BALB/c 3T3 cells, exhibiting lower cytotoxicity than the chemotherapeutic agent DX. Additionally, PWH inhibited malignant colony formation and appeared to affect focal adhesion in the B16F10 cell line. These results provide preliminary evidence supporting PWH as a potential compound for future cancer research.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Dr Edvaldo da Silva Trindade and Dr Fernanda Fogagnoli Simas from the Laboratory of Inflammatory and Neoplastic Cells - Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil, for kindly providing the cell lines.

Funding

Funding: The present study was funded by the Araucaria Foundation (Official Agreement no. 051/2017), CNPq (grant nos. 404717/2026-0, 310731/2021-6 and 403295/2021-1), and fellowships from CAPES (Funding code 001, PROEX - Grant no. 88881.924191/2023-01).

Availability of data and materials

The data generated in the present study may be requested from the corresponding author.

Authors' contributions

APB, SCSB and RFA conducted the assays. GDOF and FFW analyzed the photo-derived data. LMCC isolated and characterized the polysaccharides. MHA contributed to the experimental design. KN and LCF assisted in the analysis and discussion of the results. FI was involved in the experimental design, and data analysis and interpretation. APB and FI confirm the authenticity of all the raw data.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Use of artificial intelligence tools

During the preparation of this work, AI tools were used to improve the readability and language of the manuscript or to generate images, and subsequently, the authors revised and edited the content produced by the AI tools as necessary, taking full responsibility for the ultimate content of the present manuscript.

References

1 

Hossain MB and Haldar Neer AH: Chemotherapy. Cancer Treat Res. 185:49–58. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Riganti C and Contino M: New strategies to overcome resistance to chemotherapy and immune system in cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 20(4783)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Sultana N: Biological properties and biomedical applications of pectin and pectin-based composites: A review. Molecules. 28(7974)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Pedrosa LF, Raz A and Fabi JP: The complex biological effects of pectin: Galectin-3 targeting as potential human health improvement? Biomolecules. 12(289)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Prado SBRD, Ferreira GF, Harazono Y, Shiga TM, Raz A, Carpita NC and Fabi JP: Ripening-induced chemical modifications of papaya pectin inhibit cancer cell proliferation. Sci Rep. 7(16564)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Ogutu FO, Mu TH, Sun H and Zhang M: Ultrasonic modified sweet potato pectin induces apoptosis like cell death in colon cancer (HT-29) cell line. Nutr Cancer. 70:136–145. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Maxwell EG, Colquhoun IJ, Chau HK, Hotchkiss AT, Waldron KW, Morris VJ and Belshaw NJ: Modified sugar beet pectin induces apoptosis of colon cancer cells via an interaction with the neutral sugar side-chains. Carbohydr Polym. 136:923–929. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Delphi L and Sepehri H: Apple pectin: A natural source for cancer suppression in 4T1 breast cancer cells in vitro and express p53 in mouse bearing 4T1 cancer tumors, in vivo. Biomed Pharmacother. 84:637–644. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Li DQ, Li J, Dong HL, Li X, Zhang JQ, Ramaswamy S and Xu F: Pectin in biomedical and drug delivery applications: A review. Int J Biol Macromol. 185:49–65. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Ortega-Vidal J, Ruiz-Martos L, Salido S and Altarejos J: Proanthocyanidins in pruning wood extracts of four european plum (Prunus domestica L.) cultivars and their hLDHA inhibitory activity. Chem Biodivers. 20(e202200931)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Konrade D, Gaidukovs S, Vilaplana F and Sivan P: Pectin from fruit- and berry-juice production by-products: Determination of physicochemical, antioxidant and rheological properties. Foods. 12(1615)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Markov PA, Paderin NM, Chelpanova TI, Efimtseva EA, Nikitina IR and Popov SV: Gastroprotective and antidepressant-like effect of plum pectin (Prunus domestica L.) under water-immobilization stress in laboratory mice. Vopr Pitan. 92:16–25. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar : (In Russian).

13 

Cantu-Jungles TM, Maria-Ferreira D, da Silva LM, Baggio CH, Werner MF, Iacomini M, Cipriani TR and Cordeiro LM: Polysaccharides from prunes: Gastroprotective activity and structural elucidation of bioactive pectins. Food Chem. 146:492–499. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Popov SV, Ovodova RG, Golovchenko VV, Khramova DS, Markov PA, Smirnov VV, Shashkov AS and Ovodov YS: Pectic polysaccharides of the fresh plum Prunus domestica L. isolated with a simulated gastric fluid and their anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities. Food Chem. 143:106–113. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Vaz da Luz KT, Gonçalves JP, de Lima Bellan D, Visnheski BRC, Schneider VS, Cortes Cordeiro LM, Vargas JE, Puga R, da Silva Trindade E, de Oliveira CC and Simas FF: Molecular weight-dependent antitumor effects of prunes-derived type I arabinogalactan on human and murine triple wild-type melanomas. Carbohydr Res. 535(108986)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Mosmann T: Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 65:55–63. 1983.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Repetto G, del Peso A and Zurita JL: Neutral red uptake assay for the estimation of cell viability/cytotoxicity. Nat Protoc. 3:1125–1131. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Bonnekoh B, Wevers A, Jugert F, Merk H and Mahrle G: Colorimetric growth assay for epidermal células cultures by their crystal violet binding capacity. Arch Dermatol Res. 281:487–490. 1989.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Liang CC, Park AY and Guan JL: In vitro scratch assay: A convenient and inexpensive method for analysis of cell migration in vitro. Nat Protoc. 2:329–333. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Borges BE, Appel MH, Cofré AR, Prado ML, Steclan CA, Esnard F, Zanata SM, Laurindo FR and Nakao LS: The flavo-oxidase QSOX1 supports vascular smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation: Evidence for a role in neointima growth. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1852:1334–1346. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Boia-Ferreira M, Basílio AB, Hamasaki AE, Matsubara FH, Appel MH, Da Costa CRV, Amson R, Telerman A, Chaim OM, Veiga SS and Senff-Ribeiro A: TCTP as a therapeutic target in melanoma treatment. Br J Cancer. 117:656–665. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Naliwaiko K, Luvizon AC, Donatti L, Chammas R, Mercadante AF, Zanata SM and Nakao LS: Guanosine promotes B16F10 melanoma cell differentiation through PKC-ERK 1/2 pathway. Chem Biol Interact. 173:122–128. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Maddodi N and Setaluri V: Prognostic significance of melanoma differentiation and trans-differentiation. Cancers (Basel). 2:989–999. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Qi X, Chen Y, Liu S, Liu L, Yu Z, Yin L, Fu L, Deng M, Liang S and Lü M: Sanguinarine inhibits melanoma invasion and migration by targeting the FAK/PI3K/AKT/mTOR signalling pathway. Pharm Biol. 61:696–709. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Raineri A, Fasoli S, Campagnari R, Gotte G and Menegazzi M: Onconase restores cytotoxicity in dabrafenib-resistant A375 human melanoma cells and affects cell migration, invasion and colony formation capability. Int J Mol Sci. 20(5980)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Cobs-Rosas M, Concha-Olmos J, Weinstein-Oppenheimer C and Zúñiga-Hansen ME: Assessment of antiproliferative activity of pectic substances obtained by different extraction methods from rapeseed cake on cancer cell lines. Carbohydr Polym. 117:923–932. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Amaral SDC, Barbieri SF, Ruthes AC, Bark JM, Brochado Winnischofer SM and Silveira JLM: Cytotoxic effect of crude and purified pectins from Campomanesia xanthocarpa Berg on human glioblastoma cells. Carbohydr Polym. 224(115140)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Chen GT, Fu YX, Yang WJ, Hu QH and Zhao LY: Effects of polysaccharides from the base of Flammulina velutipes stipe on growth of murine RAW264.7, B16F10 and L929 cells. Int J Biol Micromol. 107:2150–2156. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

30 

Xiang T, Yang R, Li L, Lin H and Kai G: Research progress and application of pectin: A review. J Food Sci. 89:6985–7007. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Prado SBRD, Santos GRC, Mourão PAS and Fabi JP: Chelate-soluble pectin fraction from papaya pulp interacts with galectin-3 and inhibits colon cancer cell proliferation. Int J Biol Macromol. 126:170–178. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Wu XQ, Fu JY, Mei RY, Dai XJ, Li JH, Zhao XF and Liu MQ: Inhibition of liver cancer HepG2 cell proliferation by enzymatically prepared low-molecular citrus pectin. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 23:861–872. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Angeli RF, Bialli AP, Baal SCS, dos Santos EF, Filho PSL, Schneider VS, Fernandes LC, Naliwaiko K, Cordeiro LMC and Iagher F: Antitumor activity of polysaccharides obtained from guavira fruit industrial waste on murine melanoma cells. Bioact Carbohydrates Diet Fibre. 33(100469)2025.

34 

Fan Y, Sun L, Yang S, He C, Tai G and Zhou Y: The roles and mechanisms of homogalacturonan and rhamnogalacturonan I pectins on the inhibition of cell migration. Int J Biol Macromol. 106:207–217. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

35 

do Prado SBR, Shiga TM, Harazono Y, Hogan VA, Raz A, Carpita NC and Fabi JP: Migration and proliferation of cancer cells in culture are differentially affected by molecular size of modified citrus pectin. Carbohydr Polym. 211:141–151. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

36 

Wikiera A, Kozioł A, Mika M and Stodolak B: Structure and bioactivity of apple pectin isolated with arabinanase and mannanase. Food Chem 15:. 388(133020)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

37 

Cao XY, Liu JL, Yang W, Hou X and Li QJ: Antitumor activity of polysaccharide extracted from Pleurotus ostreatus mycelia against gastric cancer in vitro and in vivo. Mol Med Rep. 12:2383–2389. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

38 

Adami ER, Corso CR, Turin-Oliveira NM, Galindo CM, Milani L, Stipp MC, do Nascimento GE, Chequin A, da Silva LM, de Andrade SF, et al: Antineoplastic effect of pectic polysaccharides from green sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum) on mammary tumor cells in vivo and in vitro. Carbohydr Polym. 201:280–292. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

39 

Vayssade M, Sengkhamparn N, Verhoef R, Delaigue C, Goundiam O, Vigneron P, Voragen AG, Schols HA and Nagel MD: Antiproliferative and proapoptotic actions of okra pectin on B16F10 melanoma cells. Phytother Res. 24:982–989. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

40 

Nikkhah M, Strobl JS, De Vita R and Agah M: The cytoskeletal organization of breast carcinoma and fibroblast cells inside three dimensional (3-D) isotropic silicon microstructures. Biomaterials. 31:4552–4561. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

41 

Xu B, Song G and Ju Y: Effect of focal adhesion kinase on the regulation of realignment and tenogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells by mechanical stretch. Connect Tissue Res. 51:373–379. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

42 

Zhao J and Guon JL: Signal transduction by focal adhesion kinase in cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 28:35–40. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

  • Abstract
  • View
  • Download
Copy and paste a formatted citation
Spandidos Publications style
Bialli AP, Baal SC, Angeli RF, Franco GD, Weirich FF, Fernandes LC, Cordeiro LM, Naliwaiko K, Appel MH, Iagher F, Iagher F, et al: Pectins extracted from prunes (<em>Prunus domestica</em> L.) inhibit the invasive capacity of melanoma cells. Int J Funct Nutr 6: 9, 2025.
APA
Bialli, A.P., Baal, S.C., Angeli, R.F., Franco, G.D., Weirich, F.F., Fernandes, L.C. ... Iagher, F. (2025). Pectins extracted from prunes (<em>Prunus domestica</em> L.) inhibit the invasive capacity of melanoma cells. International Journal of Functional Nutrition, 6, 9. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijfn.2025.50
MLA
Bialli, A. P., Baal, S. C., Angeli, R. F., Franco, G. D., Weirich, F. F., Fernandes, L. C., Cordeiro, L. M., Naliwaiko, K., Appel, M. H., Iagher, F."Pectins extracted from prunes (<em>Prunus domestica</em> L.) inhibit the invasive capacity of melanoma cells". International Journal of Functional Nutrition 6.1 (2025): 9.
Chicago
Bialli, A. P., Baal, S. C., Angeli, R. F., Franco, G. D., Weirich, F. F., Fernandes, L. C., Cordeiro, L. M., Naliwaiko, K., Appel, M. H., Iagher, F."Pectins extracted from prunes (<em>Prunus domestica</em> L.) inhibit the invasive capacity of melanoma cells". International Journal of Functional Nutrition 6, no. 1 (2025): 9. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijfn.2025.50
Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Bialli AP, Baal SC, Angeli RF, Franco GD, Weirich FF, Fernandes LC, Cordeiro LM, Naliwaiko K, Appel MH, Iagher F, Iagher F, et al: Pectins extracted from prunes (<em>Prunus domestica</em> L.) inhibit the invasive capacity of melanoma cells. Int J Funct Nutr 6: 9, 2025.
APA
Bialli, A.P., Baal, S.C., Angeli, R.F., Franco, G.D., Weirich, F.F., Fernandes, L.C. ... Iagher, F. (2025). Pectins extracted from prunes (<em>Prunus domestica</em> L.) inhibit the invasive capacity of melanoma cells. International Journal of Functional Nutrition, 6, 9. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijfn.2025.50
MLA
Bialli, A. P., Baal, S. C., Angeli, R. F., Franco, G. D., Weirich, F. F., Fernandes, L. C., Cordeiro, L. M., Naliwaiko, K., Appel, M. H., Iagher, F."Pectins extracted from prunes (<em>Prunus domestica</em> L.) inhibit the invasive capacity of melanoma cells". International Journal of Functional Nutrition 6.1 (2025): 9.
Chicago
Bialli, A. P., Baal, S. C., Angeli, R. F., Franco, G. D., Weirich, F. F., Fernandes, L. C., Cordeiro, L. M., Naliwaiko, K., Appel, M. H., Iagher, F."Pectins extracted from prunes (<em>Prunus domestica</em> L.) inhibit the invasive capacity of melanoma cells". International Journal of Functional Nutrition 6, no. 1 (2025): 9. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijfn.2025.50
Follow us
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
About
  • Spandidos Publications
  • Careers
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
How can we help?
  • Help
  • Live Chat
  • Contact
  • Email to our Support Team