Comparative study of the osteogenic differentiation capacity of human bone marrow- and human adipose-derived stem cells under cyclic tensile stretch using quantitative analysis

Ye,Yaping; Du,Yu; Guo,Fengjing; Gong,Chen; Yang,Kaixiang; Qin,Liang

doi:10.3892/ijmm.2012.1123

Comparative study of the osteogenic differentiation capacity of human bone marrow- and human adipose-derived stem cells under cyclic tensile stretch using quantitative analysis

Authors:
- Yaping Ye
- Yu Du
- Fengjing Guo
- Chen Gong
- Kaixiang Yang
- Liang Qin
View Affiliations

Affiliations: Department of Orthopedics, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, P.R. China
Published online on: September 7, 2012 https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2012.1123
Pages: 1327-1334

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

Abstract

Studies comparing the osteogenic differentiation capacity of human bone marrow-derived stem cells (hBMSCs) and human adipose-derived stem cells (hASCs) cultured in osteogenic differentiation medium have been inconclusive. Apart from chemical stimuli, mechanical stimuli have also been shown to be important in bone tissue engineering, which is referred to as functional bone tissue engineering. hBMSCs and hASCs have been shown to be sensitive to both chemical and mechanical stimuli. In an attempt to find a better seed cell in functional bone tissue engineering, we tried to quantify the osteogenic differentiation capacity of hBMSCs and hASCs under both mechanical and chemical stimuli. In this study, hBMSCs and hASCs were isolated from the same volunteers. Cells were cultured in osteogenic differentiation medium with and without exposure to cyclic tensile stretch (CTS). Quantitative measurement of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity revealed that the osteogenic differentiation capacity of hBMSCs was similar to that of hASCs in the early phase of differentiation in the CTS-stimulated groups. Quantitative measurement of mineralization showed that the late-phase osteogenic differentiation capacity of the hBMSCs was superior to that of hASCs in the CTS-stimulated groups. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis was performed 5 and 10 days after cell culture. The results of the RT-PCR revealed that the osteogenic differentiation capacity of hASCs was inferior to that of hBMSCs both in the CTS-stimulated and unstimulated groups. All the results showed that both hBMSCs and hASCs were sensitive to CTS during the osteogenic differentiation process. This study compared the osteogenic differentiation capacity of hBMSCs and hASCs in response to mechanical stimulations and has important implications for the use of stem cells in functional bone tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

View Figures

View References

1.	E PotierJ NoaillyK ItoDirecting bone marrow-derived stromal cell function with mechanicsJ Biomech43807817201010.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.11.01919962149
2.	C XiaoH ZhouS GeRepair of orbital wall defects using biocoral scaffolds combined with bone marrow stem cells enhanced by human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in a canine modelInt J Mol Med26517525201020818491
3.	NA AritaD PelaezHS CheungActivation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) is needed for the TGFbeta-induced chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cellsBiochem Biophys Res Commun405564569201110.1016/j.bbrc.2011.01.068
4.	JC BodleAD HansonEG LoboaAdipose-derived stem cells in functional bone tissue engineering: lessons from bone mechanobiologyTissue Eng Part B Rev17195211201110.1089/ten.teb.2010.073821338267
5.	NJ PanettaDM GuptaJK LeeDC WanGW CommonsMT LongakerHuman adipose-derived stromal cells respond to and elaborate bone morphogenetic protein-2 during in vitro osteogenic differentiationPlast Reconstr Surg125483493201010.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c82d75
6.	H TappEJ HanleyJC PattHE GruberAdipose-derived stem cells: characterization and current application in orthopaedic tissue repairExp Biol Med (Maywood)23419200910.3181/0805-MR-17019109553
7.	G LiuY ChengS GuoTransplantation of adipose-derived stem cells for peripheral nerve repairInt J Mol Med28565572201121687931
8.	DA De UgarteK MorizonoA ElbarbaryComparison of multi-lineage cells from human adipose tissue and bone marrowCells Tissues Organs174101109200312835573
9.	H HattoriM SatoK MasuokaOsteogenic potential of human adipose tissue-derived stromal cells as an alternative stem cell sourceCells Tissues Organs178212200415550755
10.	GI ImYW ShinKB LeeDo adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells have the same osteogenic and chondrogenic potential as bone marrow-derived cells?Osteoarthritis Cartilage13845853200510.1016/j.joca.2005.05.00516129630
11.	R VishnubalajiM Al-NbaheenB KadalmaniA AldahmashT RameshComparative investigation of the differentiation capability of bone-marrow- and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells by qualitative and quantitative analysisCell Tissue Res347419427201210.1007/s00441-011-1306-322287041
12.	S GhazanfariM Tafazzoli-ShadpourMA ShokrgozarEffects of cyclic stretch on proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells and their differentiation to smooth muscle cellsBiochem Biophys Res Commun388601605200910.1016/j.bbrc.2009.08.07219695226
13.	F ColazzoP SarathchandraRT SmolenskiExtracellular matrix production by adipose-derived stem cells: implications for heart valve tissue engineeringBiomaterials32119127201110.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.09.00321074262
14.	CE SarrafWR OttoM EastwoodIn vitro mesenchymal stem cell differentiation after mechanical stimulationCell Prolif4499108201110.1111/j.1365-2184.2010.00740.x21199014
15.	RD SumanasingheSH BernackiEG LoboaOsteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells in collagen matrices: effect of uniaxial cyclic tensile strain on bone morphogenetic protein (BMP-2) mRNA expressionTissue Eng1234593465200610.1089/ten.2006.12.3459
16.	Z Goli-MalekabadiM Tafazzoli-ShadpourM RabbaniM JanmalekiEffect of uniaxial stretch on morphology and cytoskeleton of human mesenchymal stem cells: static vsdynamic loading Biomed Tech (Berl)56259265201110.1515/BMT.2011.10921988158
17.	OH LowryNJ RosebroughAL FarrRJ RandallProtein measurement with the Folin phenol reagentJ Biol Chem193265275195114907713
18.	HA ElSH CartmellBioreactors for bone tissue engineeringProc Inst Mech Eng H22415231532201010.1243/09544119JEIM80221287835
19.	L TirkkonenH HalonenJ HyttinenThe effects of vibration loading on adipose stem cell number, viability and differentiation towards bone-forming cellsJ R Soc Interface817361747201110.1098/rsif.2011.021121613288
20.	M DominiciK Le BlancI MuellerMinimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statementCytotherapy8315317200610.1080/14653240600855905
21.	JB MitchellK McIntoshS ZvonicImmunophenotype of human adipose-derived cells: temporal changes in stromal-associated and stem cell-associated markersStem Cells24376385200610.1634/stemcells.2005-023416322640
22.	MN KangHH YoonYK SeoJK ParkEffect of mechanical stimulation on the differentiation of cord stem cellsConnect Tissue Res53149159201210.3109/03008207.2011.61928422149641
23.	F OttoAP ThornellT CromptonCbfa1, a candidate gene for cleidocranial dysplasia syndrome, is essential for osteoblast differentiation and bone developmentCell89765771199710.1016/S0092-8674(00)80259-79182764
24.	C ColnotCell sources for bone tissue engineering: insights from basic scienceTissue Eng Part B Rev17449457201121902612
25.	RT FranceschiBS IyerRelationship between collagen synthesis and expression of the osteoblast phenotype in MC3T3-E1 cellsJ Bone Miner Res7235246199210.1002/jbmr.56500702161373931