Hepatitis B virus X protein inhibits extracellular IFN-α-mediated signal transduction by downregulation of type I IFN receptor

  • Authors:
    • Il-Rae Cho
    • Myungju Oh
    • Sang Seok Koh
    • Waraporn Malilas
    • Ratakorn Srisuttee
    • Byung Hak Jhun
    • Sandra Pellegrini
    • Serge Y. Fuchs
    • Young-Hwa Chung
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: January 3, 2012     https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2012.879
  • Pages: 581-586
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

We have previously shown that hepatitis B virus (HBV) protein X (HBX), a regulatory protein of HBV, activates Stat1, leading to type I interferon (IFN) production. Type I IFN secreted from HBX-expressing hepatic cells enforces antiviral signals through its binding to the cognate type I IFN receptor. We therefore investigated how cells handle this detrimental situation. Interestingly, compared to Chang cells stably expressing an empty vector (Chang-Vec), Chang cells stably expressing HBX (Chang-HBX) showed lower levels of IFN-α receptor 1 (IFNAR1) protein, a subunit of type I IFN receptor. The levels of IFNAR1 transcripts detected in Chang-HBX cells were lower than the levels in Chang-Vec cells, indicating that HBX regulates IFNAR1 at the transcriptional level. Moreover, we observed that HBX induced the translocation of IFNAR1 to the cytoplasm. Consistent with these observations, HBX also downregulated Tyk2, which is required for the stable expression of IFNAR1 on the cell surface. Eventually, Chang-HBX cells consistently maintained a lower level of IFNAR1 expression and displayed no proper response to IFN-α, while Chang-Vec cells exhibited a proper response to IFN-α treatment. Taken together, we propose that HBX downregulates IFNAR1, leading to the avoidance of extracellular IFN-α signal transduction.

Introduction

The type I interferon (IFN) receptor consists of 2 subunits, IFN-α receptor 1 (IFNAR1) and IFNAR2, which belong to the type II cytokine receptor superfamily (1). This heterodimeric complex is able to interact with IFN-α and IFN-β, resulting in the phosphorylation of Tyk2 and Jak1 that are bound to IFNAR1 and IFNAR2, respectively (2). Subsequently, the Stat proteins, Stat1 and Stat2 are phosphorylated at specific tyrosine residues, which allows the 2 proteins to form a Stat1/2 heterodimer based on SH2/phosphotyrosine interactions. The formation of this heterodimer facilitates its association with IFN regulatory factor (IRF)9 to form an active heterotrimeric transcription factor called IFN-stimulated gene factor (ISGF)3. ISGF3 targets specific sequences such as IFN-stimulated response element and IFN-γ-activated sequence in the promoters of IFN-stimulated genes, leading to the establishment of antiviral status (3).

After type I IFN binds to its cognate type I IFN receptor, the receptor is downregulated by endocytosis mediated by cargo-specific clathrin machinery, and degraded via the lysosomal and proteosomal pathways in order to limit the magnitude and duration of IFN signaling (4,5). The adaptin protein 2 complex, a component of the cargo-specific clathrin machinery recognizes the Tyr-based endocytic motif of IFNAR1, leading to the efficient endocytosis of IFNAR1 (5). The Skip, Cullin, F-box containing complex β-TrCP E3 ubiquitin ligase mediates the ubiquitination of IFNAR1 in a phosphorylation-dependent manner, eventually designating IFNAR1 for lysosomal degradation (5). Catalytic activation of Tyk2 is required for these events but is not essential for IFNAR1 internalization (6). Conversely, it has been also reported that Tyk2 is essential for the stable cell surface expression of IFNAR1 and stabilizes IFNAR1 by its interaction in the basal condition (in the absence of ligand) (7). Further studies have revealed that binding of Tyk2 in the proximity of the Tyr-based linear motif of IFNAR1 is required to prevent IFNAR1 internalization and to maintain its cell surface expression by physically shielding the Tyr-based motif from recognition by AP2, a component of the endocytic cargo machinery (8).

The human hepatitis B virus (HBV) induces acute and chronic hepatitis and is closely associated with the incidence of human liver cancer (9). Among the 4 proteins that are derived from the HBV genome, the hepatitis B virus X (HBX) protein is involved in multiple signaling pathways associated with cell survival and proliferation. Cell signal transduction pathways that are activated by HBX include the Jak1/Stat3, PI-3 kinase pathways (1013), and the Ras/Raf/MAPK signaling cascade which leads to NF-κB activation (14,15). HBX expression also increases reactive oxygen species via calcium signaling and cellular kinases, resulting in the activation of transcription factors NF-κB and Stat3 (10). Studies have revealed that HBV-induced oxidative stress also stimulates the translocation of Raf-1. Src inhibitors or a dominant negative PAK mutant abolishes HBX-mediated Raf-1 mitochondrial translocation (16). Recently, we have shown that HBX-mediated up-regulation of Foxo4 plays a critical role in the prevention of oxidative stress-induced apoptosis in a liver cell line (17).

Based on our observation that HBX induces the production of type I IFN by the activation of Stat1 (18), we believed it is likely that secreted type I IFN from HBX-expressing hepatic cells enforces antiviral signals through its binding to the cognate type I IFN receptor. We initiated this study to investigate how HBX-expressing hepatic cells overcome this unfavorable situation. Here, we reported that HBX expression downregulates type I IFN receptor, leading to disturbance of extracellular type I IFN signaling.

Materials and methods

Cell cultures, reagent and antibodies

Chang cells, Chang cells stably expressing vector (Chang-Vec), Chang cells stably expressing HBX (Chang-HBX), and HEK 293 T cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin and streptomycin. IFN-α was purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Anti-IFNAR1 and anti-IFNγR and rabbit polyclonal anti-c-Myc antibodies were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA) and β-tubulin antibodies were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). Antibodies against Tyk2 and Jak1 were acquired from Cell Signaling (Danvers, MA) and anti-Flag antibody was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).

siRNA transfection

Cells were trypsinized and incubated overnight to achieve 60–70% confluence before siRNA transfection. Tyk2 siRNA (60 nM, sense 5′-UCUCACCUCUUCC CAUUCC(dTdT)-3′ and antisense 5′-GGAAUGGGAAGAGGU GAGA(dTdT)-3′) purchased from Bioneer (Daejeon, Korea) or control siRNA (19) were mixed with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The cells were incubated with the transfection mixture for 6 h and then rinsed with DMEM containing 10% serum. The cells were incubated for 48 h before harvest.

Western blotting

Cells were harvested and treated with lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5) containing 0.1 mM Na2VO3, 1 mM NaF and protease inhibitors (Sigma-Aldrich). For immunoblotting, proteins from whole cell lysates were resolved by 10 or 12% SDS-PAGE and then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Primary antibodies were used at 1:1,000 or 1:2,000 dilutions, and secondary antibodies conjugated with horseradish peroxidase were used at 1:2,000 dilutions in 5% nonfat dry milk. After a final wash, nitrocellulose membranes were exposed for an enhanced chemiluminescence assay using LAS 3000 (Fuji, Tokyo, Japan).

Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis

Total-RNA was extracted from the cells using the RNeasy micro kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Three micrograms of total RNA were converted to cDNA using Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen), and PCR was performed using specific primers described elsewhere (20). The cDNAs of each sample were diluted, and PCR was run at the optimized cycle number. β-actin mRNA was measured as an internal standard. After amplification, the products were subjected to electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose and detected by ethidium bromide staining.

Immunofluorescence

Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, permeabilized with cold acetone for 15 min, blocked with 10% goat serum for 30 min, and reacted with a 1:100-diluted primary antibody for 30 min at room temperature. After incubation, the cells were washed extensively with PBS, incubated with a 1:500-diluted Alexa Fluor 680-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR), or with a 1:500-diluted Alexa Fluor 514-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG antibody (Molecular Probes) in PBS for 30 min at room temperature, and then washed 3 times with PBS. The stained cells were mounted with PBS containing 10% glycerol and photographed using a LSM510 confocal microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).

Results

HBX expression induces downregulation of type I IFN-α receptor 1

We have previously shown that HBX expression mimics intracellular type I IFN signaling through Stat1 activation in Chang cells, leading to the production and secretion of type I IFN into the surrounding microenvironment (18). Although we previously proposed that HBX may protect HBV-infected hepatic cells from lytic infection of viruses, we now face a contradiction; the delivery of an enforced antiviral signal to the cells by the released type I IFN would exert a disadvantageous effect on HBX-expressing hepatic cells. How do the HBX-expressing hepatic cells resolve this detrimental situation? Downregulation of the type I IFN receptor may well solve this contradiction. To test our hypothesis, we examined whether the type I IFN receptor consisting of 2 subunits; IFNAR1 and IFNAR2 is downregulated in the presence of HBX. Interestingly, we found that IFNAR1 is less abundant in the cell lysates of Chang-HBX cells than in those of Chang-Vec cells (Fig. 1A). We next examined IFN-γ receptor levels in both Chang-HBX and Chang-Vec cells, and found that the levels of IFN-γ receptor in Chang-HBX cells are similar to those in Chang-Vec cells (Fig. 1A).

To explore how IFNAR1 is downregulated in the presence of HBX (Fig. 1A), we examined IFNAR1 transcript levels in Chang-Vec and Chang-HBX cells to assess HBX-mediated transcriptional regulation. The abundance of IFNAR1 transcripts in Chang-HBX cells was lesser than that in Chang-Vec cells (Fig. 1B). This indicates that HBX might play an important role in the transcriptional regulation of IFNAR1.

HBX induces translocation of IFNAR1 into the cytoplasm

In addition to the HBX-mediated decrease in IFNAR1 expression, another possible mechanism for the efficient blockage of type I IFN receptor-mediated antiviral signaling is translocation of the IFN receptor into the cytoplasm. To test this theory, we attempted to examine IFNAR1 localization after staining using confocal microscopy. We found that IFNAR1 is localized in the cytoplasm of Chang-HBX cells, but preferentially localized in the plasma membrane of Chang-Vec cells (Fig. 2A). To confirm the cytosolic localization of IFNAR1 in the presence of HBX, exogenous IFNAR1 tagged with a Flag epitope (IFNAR1-Flag) was employed with a Myc-tagged HBX expression vector. IFNAR1-Flag was detected in the cytosol rather than in the membrane in the presence of HBX, similarly to endogenous IFNAR1 in Chang-HBX cells (Fig. 2B). On the other hand, in the absence of HBX, exogenous IFNAR1 in Chang cells was found in the plasma membrane similar to endogenous IFNAR1 in Chang-Vec cells (Fig. 2B).

Decrease of Tyk2 mediated by HBX diminishes IFNAR1 levels

Since previous studies have shown that Tyk2 is essential for the stable cell surface expression of IFNAR1 and stabilizes IFNAR1 by its interaction in the basal condition (in the absence of ligand) (7), we examined the expression levels of Tyk2 in Chang-Vec and Chang-HBX cells. The Chang-HBX cells exhibited a significantly lower abundance of Tyk2 than Chang-Vec cells (Fig. 3A). However, the levels of Jak1 were similar in both cells. Similar protein quantities of Stat1, which is associated with the IFN signaling pathway, were also found in both cells although highly activated Stat1 was found in Chang-HBX cells (18). To confirm that the level of Tyk2 determines the IFNAR1 protein level, we transiently expressed IFNAR1 alone or together with Tyk2 in HEK 293T cells. As seen in Fig. 3B, compared to the expression of IFNAR1 only, co-expression of IFNAR1 with Tyk2 enhanced the level of IFNAR1 expression. We also examined the effect of reduced expression of Tyk2 on IFNAR1 protein levels in Chang cells. When siRNA against Tyk2 was introduced into Chang cells expressing endogenous IFNAR1, expression of IFNAR1 was significantly reduced than that in Chang cells treated with control siRNA (Fig. 3C). To confirm that the presence of HBX downregulates the level of Tyk2 protein, which results in lower IFNAR1 expression, we transiently introduced HBX into Chang cells. We found that HBX downregulates the expression of Tyk2, leading to a decrease in IFNAR1 expression while control vector fails to decrease the Tyk2 level (Fig. 3D). These results indicate that HBX also modulates IFNAR1 expression via Tyk2.

IFNAR1 does not function normally in Chang-HBX cells during IFN-α signaling

We have shown that the presence of HBX suppresses IFNAR1 transcription directly (Fig. 1B), and downregulates IFNAR1 expression via Tyk2 in the absence of its ligand; IFN-α (Fig. 3). To examine how IFNAR1 responds to type I IFN in Chang-Vec and Chang-HBX cells, both cell lines were treated with IFN-α for 12 h. IFNAR1 levels were reduced at 4 h post-treatment and then returned to original levels at 8 h post-treatment in Chang-Vec cells (Fig. 4). However, the reduced IFNAR1 level was not altered during IFN-α signaling for 12 h in Chang-HBX cells. This result indicates that IFNAR1 may not function normally in Chang-HBX cells during IFN-α signaling.

Discussion

HBV infection afflicts more than 400 million people worldwide and accelerates the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (21). Regarding the role of HBX-mediated type I IFN production, we initially proposed that type I IFN inhibits super-infection by the virus, protecting the host and eventually maintaining chronic infection of HBV (18). We additionally propose that type I IFN mediated by HBX may play a role in inflammation which is believed to be closely related to liver carcinogenesis on the basis of mounting evidence from preclinical and clinical studies that persistent inflammation functions as a driving force in the development of cancer (22,23). However, the autocrine or paracrine effects of the released type I IFN from HBV-infected hepatic cells are yet unknown. Type I IFN enforces antiviral status through its binding to the cognate receptor; how do the HBV-infected hepatic cells respond to this unfavorable condition? In this study, we report the answer to this question; HBX downregulates IFNAR1, leading to avoidance of extracellular type I IFN-mediated signaling.

Several viruses have evolved strategies of immune evasion to impair type I IFN signaling pathways. The E6 protein of human papillomavirus (HPV) 18 has been shown to selectively interact with Tyk2 and block its activation (24). Japanese encephalitis virus infection also selectively impairs Tyk2 phosphorylation and West Nile virus infection hinders the phosphorylation of both Tyk2 and Jak1 (25,26); however, the mediators of this blockade are unknown in both cases. Other viruses affect immune escape by causing a blockage of IFN signaling at the level of Stat activation. The V protein of Sendai virus 5 and other paramyxoviruses target the Stat protein for degradation and the Sendai virus C protein interferes with Stat phosphorylation (27,28). In addition, the E7 protein of HPV impairs the assembly of IRF9 and the E1A protein of adenovirus impedes the interaction of Stat1 with transcriptional machinery (29,30). Recently, the hepatitis C virus has been shown to interfere with Stat1 activation by up-regulation of protein phosphatase 2A and the RIF protein of Kaposi’s sarcoma associated herpesvirus forms inhibitory complexes with several proteins including Tyk2, Jak1, Stat1 and Stat2, leading to the inhibition of Stat1 and Stat2 (31,32). Reviewing these lines of evidence, downregulation of Tyk2 mediated by HBX is a unique mechanism different from dephosphorylation of Tyk2 in Chang cells and, eventually leads to cytosolic localization of IFNAR1. In this study, we provide evidence of a novel mechanism for the modulation of type I IFN signaling by the downregulation of Tyk2. Related to regulation via Tyk2, another study has reported that expression of SHP-1 is diminished or abolished in most lymphoma cell lines and in some colorectal cancer (3335). Conversely, transient expression of SHP-1 inhibits tumor cell growth via downregulation of Jak1 and Tyk2 (33). Our future study will be directed towards exploring whether protein phosphatases including SHP-1 are associated with the specific degradation of Tyk2. Type I IFN signaling pathway involves the binding of type I IFN to its receptor, and then phosphorylation of Jak1 and Tyk2 takes place followed by the activation of Stat1. We herein suggest that the phosphorylation of Stat1 is independent of Tyk2 at least in the Chang-HBX cells.

In addition, we also observed that IFNAR1 is regulated at the transcriptional level. It is possible that HBX induces a transcription factor with suppressor activity to bind to the promoter of IFNAR1 as seen in the case of PTEN promoter, which is occupied by the p53 tumor suppressor in the presence of HBX (36). HBX might cause an instability in IFNAR1 mRNA by inducing the release of a RNA-binding protein such as HuR from the 3′ untranslated region (37). Moreover, HBX may induce methylation at a G/C region in the IFNAR1 promoter via the upregulation of DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) 1 activity; HBX has similarly been reported to activate DNMT1, resulting in suppression of p16(INK1a), a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor through hypermethylation of the p16(INK1a) promoter (38). The detailed mechanism of HBX-mediated suppression of IFNAR1 at the transcriptional level remains under investigation.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Korea Research Foundation (KRF-2008-313-E00113) and the World Class University Program (R31-2008-000-20004-0) through NRF funded by the Korean government.

References

1 

B Payelle-BrogardS PellegriniBiochemical monitoring of the early endocytic traffic of the type I interferon receptorJ Interferon Cytokine Res308998201010.1089/jir.2009.004420028207

2 

TC YehS PellegriniThe Janus kinase family of protein tyrosine kinases and their role in signalingCell Mol Life Sci5515231534199910.1007/s00018005039210526570

3 

GR StarkIM KerrBR WilliamsRH SilvermanRD SchreiberHow cells respond to interferonsAnnu Rev Biochem67227264199810.1146/annurev.biochem.67.1.2279759489

4 

JS BonifacinoLM TraubSignals for sorting of transmembrane proteins to endosomes and lysosomesAnnu Rev Biochem72395447200310.1146/annurev.biochem.72.121801.16180012651740

5 

KG KumarH BarriereCJ CarboneJ LiuG SwaminathanP XuY LiDP BakerJ PengGL LukacsSY FuchsSite-specific ubiquitination exposes a linear motif to promote interferon-alpha receptor endocytosisJ Cell Biol179935950200710.1083/jcb.20070603418056411

6 

J LiuA PlotnikovA BanerjeeKG Suresh KumarJ RagimbeauZ MarijanovicDP BakerS PellegriniSY FuchsLigand-independent pathway that controls stability of interferon alpha receptorBiochem Biophys Res Commun367388393200810.1016/j.bbrc.2007.12.13718166147

7 

J RagimbeauE DondiA AlcoverP EidG UzeS PellegriniThe tyrosine kinase Tyk2 controls IFNAR1 cell surface expressionEMBO J22537547200310.1093/emboj/cdg03812554654

8 

KG KumarB VargheseA BanerjeeDP BakerSN ConstantinescuS PellegriniSY FuchsBasal ubiquitin-independent internalization of interferon alpha receptor is prevented by Tyk2-mediated masking of a linear endocytic motifJ Biol Chem2831856618572200810.1074/jbc.M800991200

9 

DH NguyenL LudgateJ HuHepatitis B virus-cell interactions and pathogenesisJ Cell Physiol216289294200810.1002/jcp.2141618302164

10 

G WarisKW HuhA SiddiquiMitochondrially associated hepatitis B virus X protein constitutively activates transcription factors STAT-3 and NF-kappa B via oxidative stressMol Cell Biol2177217730200110.1128/MCB.21.22.7721-7730.2001

11 

AS KekuleU LauerL WeissB LuberPH HofschneiderHepatitis B virus transactivator HBx uses a tumour promoter signalling pathwayNature361742745199310.1038/361742a08441471

12 

YH LeeY YunHBx protein of hepatitis B virus activates Jak1-STAT signalingJ Biol Chem2732551025515199810.1074/jbc.273.39.255109738022

13 

YI LeeS Kang-ParkSI DoYI LeeThe hepatitis B virus-X protein activates a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-dependent survival signaling cascadeJ Biol Chem2761696916977200110.1074/jbc.M01126320011278872

14 

P ChirilloM FalcoPL PuriM ArtiniC BalsanoM LevreroG NatoliHepatitis B virus pX activates NF-kappa B-dependent transcription through a Raf-independent pathwayJ Virol7064164619968523586

15 

H KimYH LeeJ WonY YunThrough induction of juxtaposition and tyrosine kinase activity of Jak1, X-gene product of hepatitis B virus stimulates Ras and the transcriptional activation through AP-1, NF-kappaB, and SRE enhancersBiochem Biophys Res Commun286886894200110.1006/bbrc.2001.549611527382

16 

J ChenA SiddiquiHepatitis B virus X protein stimulates the mitochondrial translocation of Raf-1 via oxidative stressJ Virol8167576760200710.1128/JVI.00172-0717428866

17 

R SrisutteeSS KohEH ParkIR ChoHJ MinBH JhunDY YuS ParkY Park doMO LeeUpregulation of Foxo4 mediated by hepatitis B virus X protein confers resistance to oxidative stress-induced cell deathInt J Mol Med28255260201121567078

18 

EH ParkSS KohR SrisutteeIR ChoHJ MinBH JhunYS LeeKL JangCH KimRN JohnstonYH ChungExpression of HBX, an oncoprotein of hepatitis B virus, blocks reoviral oncolysis of hepatocellular carcinoma cellsCancer Gene Ther16453461200910.1038/cgt.2008.9519096445

19 

IR ChoS JeongBH JhunWG AnB LeeYT KwakSH LeeJU JungYH ChungActivation of non-canonical NF-kappaB pathway mediated by STP-A11, an oncoprotein of Herpesvirus saimiriVirology3593745200710.1016/j.virol.2006.09.00117028057

20 

H IdeT NakagawaY TeradoY KamiyamaS MutoS HorieTyk2 expression and its signaling enhances the invasiveness of prostate cancer cellsBiochem Biophys Res Commun369292296200810.1016/j.bbrc.2007.08.16017920038

21 

PM Mulrooney-CousinsTI MichalakPersistent occult hepatitis B virus infection: experimental findings and clinical implicationsWorld J Gastroenterol1356825686200710.3748/wjg.v13.i43.568217963292

22 

SI GrivennikovFR GretenM KarinImmunity, inflammation, and cancerCell140883899201010.1016/j.cell.2010.01.025

23 

MG BorrelloD Degl’InnocentiMA PierottiInflammation and cancer: the oncogene-driven connectionCancer Lett267262270200810.1016/j.canlet.2008.03.06018502035

24 

S LiS LabrecqueMC GauzziAR CuddihyAH WongS PellegriniGJ MatlashewskiAE KoromilasThe human papilloma virus (HPV)-18 E6 oncoprotein physically associates with Tyk2 and impairs Jak-STAT activation by interferon-alphaOncogene1857275737199910.1038/sj.onc.120296010523853

25 

RJ LinCL LiaoE LinYL LinBlocking of the alpha interferon-induced Jak-Stat signaling pathway by Japanese encephalitis virus infectionJ Virol7892859294200410.1128/JVI.78.17.9285-9294.200415308723

26 

JT GuoJ HayashiC SeegerWest Nile virus inhibits the signal transduction pathway of alpha interferonJ Virol7913431350200510.1128/JVI.79.3.1343-1350.200515650160

27 

D GarcinJB MarqL StrahleP le MercierD KolakofskyAll four Sendai Virus C proteins bind Stat1, but only the larger forms also induce its mono-ubiquitination and degradationVirology295256265200210.1006/viro.2001.134212033784

28 

B GotohT KomatsuK TakeuchiJ YokooParamyxovirus strategies for evading the interferon responseRev Med Virol12337357200210.1002/rmv.35712410527

29 

P BarnardNA McMillanThe human papillomavirus E7 oncoprotein abrogates signaling mediated by interferon-alphaVirology259305313199910.1006/viro.1999.977110388655

30 

DC LookWT RoswitAG FrickY Gris-AlevyDM DickhausMJ WalterMJ HoltzmanDirect suppression of Stat1 function during adenoviral infectionImmunity9871880199810.1016/S1074-7613(00)80652-49881977

31 

V ChristenF DuongC BernsmeierD SunM NassalMH HeimInhibition of alpha interferon signaling by hepatitis B virusJ Virol81159165200710.1128/JVI.01292-0617065208

32 

SA BissonAL PageD GanemA Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus protein that forms inhibitory complexes with type I interferon receptor subunits, Jak and STAT proteins, and blocks interferon-mediated signal transductionJ Virol83505650662009

33 

C WuQ GuanY WangZJ ZhaoGW ZhouSHP-1 suppresses cancer cell growth by promoting degradation of JAK kinasesJ Cell Biochem9010261037200310.1002/jcb.1072714624462

34 

J ChengD ZhangC ZhouWA MarascoDownregulation of SHP1 and up-regulation of negative regulators of JAK/STAT signaling in HTLV-1 transformed cell lines and freshly transformed human peripheral blood CD4+ T-cellsLeuk Res287182200410.1016/S0145-2126(03)00158-914630083

35 

C WuM SunL LiuGW ZhouThe function of the protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 in cancerGene306112200310.1016/S0378-1119(03)00400-112657462

36 

TW ChungYC LeeJH KoCH KimHepatitis B Virus X protein modulates the expression of PTEN by inhibiting the function of p53, a transcriptional activator in liver cellsCancer Res6334533458200312839924

37 

K AbdelmohsenR Pullmann JrA LalHH KimS GalbanX YangJD BlethrowM WalkerJ ShubertDA GillespiePhosphorylation of HuR by Chk2 regulates SIRT1 expressionMol Cell25543557200710.1016/j.molcel.2007.01.01117317627

38 

JK JungP AroraJS PaganoKL JangExpression of DNA methyltransferase 1 is activated by hepatitis B virus X protein via a regulatory circuit involving the p16INK4a-cyclin D1-CDK 4/6-pRb-E2F1 pathwayCancer Res6757715778200710.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-052917575144

Related Articles

Journal Cover

April 2012
Volume 29 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1107-3756
Online ISSN:1791-244X

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
APA
Cho, I., Oh, M., Koh, S.S., Malilas, W., Srisuttee, R., Jhun, B.H. ... Chung, Y. (2012). Hepatitis B virus X protein inhibits extracellular IFN-α-mediated signal transduction by downregulation of type I IFN receptor. International Journal of Molecular Medicine, 29, 581-586. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2012.879
MLA
Cho, I., Oh, M., Koh, S. S., Malilas, W., Srisuttee, R., Jhun, B. H., Pellegrini, S., Fuchs, S. Y., Chung, Y."Hepatitis B virus X protein inhibits extracellular IFN-α-mediated signal transduction by downregulation of type I IFN receptor". International Journal of Molecular Medicine 29.4 (2012): 581-586.
Chicago
Cho, I., Oh, M., Koh, S. S., Malilas, W., Srisuttee, R., Jhun, B. H., Pellegrini, S., Fuchs, S. Y., Chung, Y."Hepatitis B virus X protein inhibits extracellular IFN-α-mediated signal transduction by downregulation of type I IFN receptor". International Journal of Molecular Medicine 29, no. 4 (2012): 581-586. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2012.879