Effects of Smad4 on the expression of caspase‑3 and Bcl‑2 in human gingival fibroblasts cultured on 3D PLGA scaffolds induced by compressive force
- Authors:
- Published online on: January 19, 2021 https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2021.4858
- Article Number: 25
-
Copyright: © Zhao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
In orthodontic treatment, force is applied to the teeth using appliances and transmitted to the periodontal tissues, which eventually leads to tissue reconstruction of the gingiva, periodontal ligaments and alveolar bone, thereby moving the misaligned teeth to their normal positions (1). The adaptive reconstruction of periodontal tissue is the biological basis of tooth movement (2). As an important part of the periodontal tissue, gingiva is often involved in the process of orthodontic treatment, such as gingiva proliferation, recession and retraction. Such malformations persist for a number of years after treatment (3). Gingival reconstruction not only affects the rate of tooth movement and the stability after correction (4,5), but also leads to recurrence after orthodontic treatment (6).
Orthodontic pressure is converted into biological signals, which are transmitted from the extracellular to the intracellular environment, inducing a series of associated signal transduction reactions that affect the process of gingival tissue remodeling (7). Human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs) are the main cells in the gingival tissue, where they receive and transmit signals (8). In previous decades, although a number of groups have widely studied the reconstruction of alveolar bone and periodontal membrane under compressive force (9), mechanisms underlying gingival reconstruction remain largely unexplored. Our previous study showed that compressive force could promote the expression of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 and the proliferation of HGFs (10). TGF-β is an important growth factor that regulates cell proliferation and apoptosis (11,12); however, the factors and signaling pathways involving TGF-β that regulate HGF proliferation and apoptosis remain unknown.
Smad4, a key downstream factor of TGF-β signaling pathway, plays a crucial regulatory role (13). In the classical TGF-β pathway, activated Smad2/3 and Smad4 form the SMAD complex, which translocates to the nucleus (14). Smad4 is considered to be a tumor suppressor gene that is closely related to cell apoptosis (15-17). Imbalance of Smad4 expression in the TGF-β signaling pathway may lead to various diseases, including cancers, fibrous lesions, metabolic diseases and cardiovascular diseases (18-21). It has been found that Smad4 affects apoptosis by regulating apoptosis-related proteins; for example, the low expression of Smad4 in colon cancer can inhibit cell apoptosis by promoting Bcl-2 and Bcl-w expression, and decreasing caspase-3 and caspase-9 expression (22). Therefore, it is hypothesized that Smad4 may play a pivotal role in the proliferation and apoptosis of HGFs under compressive force.
Biodegradable poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) has become one of the most widely used biological scaffold materials (23-26). Compared with other scaffold materials, PLGA possesses good biological properties (27-29). Compared with a two-dimensional culture, a three-dimensional (3D) culture can more effectively mimic the natural environment within the human body, and improve the accuracy and reliability of experimental results. Therefore, a 3D HGF-PLGA culture model was established to explore the roles of Smad4, caspase-3 and Bcl-2 in regulating proliferation and apoptosis pathways in HGFs. The present study aimed to further understand the molecular mechanisms underlying orthodontic gingival reconstruction.
Materials and methods
3D culture of HGFs
HGFs were cultured in 3D PLGA as previously reported (10). Normal gingival tissues were collected from healthy teeth that received orthodontic extraction or gingival resection. Patients enrolled in the study had no systemic diseases, and were aged 10-14 years, with 17 males and 19 females. Normal gingival tissues were cut into small pieces (1×3 mm) and spread flat in culture flasks. Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (HyClone; Cytiva) with 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and 100 U/ml antibiotics (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) were put into the flasks for primary culture. After the primary cells had proliferated, they were digested with 0.25% trypsin (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) containing 100 ng/ml DNase (Roche Diagnostics) for 1 min. The digestion was stopped by adding Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% FBS and 100 U/ml antibiotics. Cells were cultured at 37°C with 5% CO2. PLGA scaffolds (molar ratio, 75:25; pore diameter, 100-200 µm; porosity, 85%; size, 2×2 cm x 300 µm; Shandong Medical Instrument Research Institute) were cut into 1×1×0.2 cm sizes. All donors and their guardians provided written informed consent, and samples were collected between March 2018 and March 2019 at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of the Stomatological Hospital affiliated to Guangxi Medical University (Nanning, China).
Application of compressive force
After 4-6 generations, HGFs were digested, and then the cell count was adjusted to 1×105/ml. HGF suspension (0.5-1 ml) was dripped on each piece of PLGA scaffold to enable more cells to attach to the scaffold. The scaffold was stored in an incubator for 2 h at 37°C. After confirming that the cells were stably attached to the PLGA, the PLGA were cultured in 6-well plates with 1 ml containing 10% fetal bovine serum medium for a further 24 h in an incubator with a constant temperature of 37°C. HGFs were continuously subjected to a compressive stress of 25 g/cm2 for 12, 24, 48 and 72 h by placing glass bottles containing lead granules on the top, as showed in Fig. 1.
Cell viability
HGFs were seeded into 96-well plates and the cell count was adjusted to 5×104 cells/well. Then, Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assays were performed after 0, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h of compressive force. CCK-8 solution (10 µl) was added to each well (1:10), and the cells were cultured for an additional 2 h before measuring the absorbance using a microplate reader (Model 3550; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 450 nm.
Overexpression of Smad4 in HGFs
After 4-6 generations, HGFs were digested, and the cell count was adjusted. HGFs were seeded in 96-well plates with 5×103 cells/well and cultured for 12 h. Then, lentivirus (Lv-control or Lv-Smad4; plasmid backbone, GV492; Shanghai GeneChem Co., Ltd.) and transfection enhancement solution HiTrans A (Shanghai GeneChem Co., Ltd.) was added (MOI=50). After 24 h, aspirate the supernatant in the culture plate and replace with a new serum medium. Additionally, a blank control group constituting normal HGFs was included in the study. The infection efficiency was observed via green fluorescence using a fluorescence microscope (Olympus Corporation) 72 h after infection. Reverse transcription-quantitative (RT-q)PCR and western blotting (WB) were performed to analyze Smad4 expression at the mRNA and protein levels.
RT-qPCR
Total RNA from HGFs was isolated using TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Then, RNA quality was tested using an RNA 6000 Nano kit (Agilent Technologies, Inc.). cDNA was synthesized using an ExScript RT reagent kit (Takara Bio, Inc.), according to the manufacturer's protocol (37°C for 15 min and 85°C for 5 sec, followed by storage at 4°C until further use. The RT-qPCR was performed on an ABI 7300 Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) with SYBR Premix Ex Taq (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) at 95°C for 30 sec, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 5 sec and 60°C for 31 sec, after which a melt curve analysis was performed at 95°C for 15 sec, 60°C for 1 min and 95°C for 15 sec. The primer sequences were: Smad4 forward, 5′-TGG TAG GAT TGT GAG GAT TAA ATC AG-3′ and reverse, 5′-ACC ATC CTA ACA CAC CTA ATT TAG TC-3′; caspase-3 forward, 5′-CCT AGC GGA TGG GTG CTA TT-3′ and reverse, 5′-CTG AGG TTT GCT GCA TCG AC-3′; Bcl-2 forward, 5′-AAT ATC CAA TCC TGT GCT GCTA-3′ and reverse, 5′-GTC CAC GTT CTT CAT TGT TAC TTC-3′; and GAPDH forward, 5′-TGT GTC CGT CGT GGA TCTGA-3′ and reverse, 5′-TTG CTG TTG AAG TCG CAG GAG-3′. All reactions were performed in triplicate and GAPDH was used as an internal control. Each experiment was repeated at least three times. The relative expression level was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCq method (30).
WB
Total protein was extracted from cells using RIPA lysis buffer with PMSF (1,000:1; Pierce; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The protein concentration was detected using a BCA assay. Proteins (30 µg/sample) and marker (5 µl) were loaded onto 10% SDS-PAGE gels. Electrophoresis was conducted under a constant voltage of 200 V for 45 min. Proteins were transferred to PVDF membranes at 200 mA for 1.5 h. TBS-0.3% Tween-20 was used to wash the PVDF membranes 3 times (5 min/wash). Membranes were then blocked in 5% skimmed milk for 1 h at room temperature before being incubated with monoclonal antibodies against human Smad4 (1:1,000; cat. no. ab40759; Abcam), Bcl-2 (1:1,000; cat. no. 4223S; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), caspase-3 (1:5,000; cat. no. ab32351; Abcam) and GAPDH (1:5,000; cat. no. SAB4300645; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) for overnight incubation at 4°C, followed by incubation for 1 h at room temperature with secondary anti-mouse/rabbit horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibodies (1:5,000; cat. nos. SA00001-1/SA00001-2; ProteinTech Group, Inc.). After several washes, protein bands were visualized using an Alpha Chemical Luminescent Gel Imaging System (Fluor Chem HD2; ProteinSimple) with ECL luminescence reagent (cat. no. abs920; Absin Bioscience, Inc.), The relative density of protein expression was analyzed quantitatively with Image Lab v3.0 software (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.).
Statistical analysis
SPSS 21 (IBM Corp.) was used for statistical analysis of experimental data. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments. Data were analyzed using one-way or two-way ANOVA with post hoc tests (Dunnett's or Tukey) for multiple comparisons. P<0.05 and α=0.05 were considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Compressive force induces the proliferation of HGFs
A 3D PLGA-HGFs culture model was previously established by our group as showed in Fig. 1 (10). Compared with the control group (0 h), the proliferation ability of HGFs significantly increased under compressive force for 12, 24 and 48 h, peaking at 24 h. Subsequently, the proliferation of HGFs was inhibited and cell viability decreased by 72 h (P<0.05; Fig. 2).
Compressive force decreases the expression of Smad4 in HGFs
The gene and protein expression of Smad4 decreased significantly following exposure to compressive force, reaching its lowest level at 24 h. Subsequently, the expression levels increased at 48 and 72 h (P<0.05; Fig. 3).
Expression of caspase-3 and Bcl-2 changed in response to compressive force in HGFs
The gene and protein expression of caspase-3 decreased significantly, reaching its lowest level at 24 h. Subsequently, its expression was increased at 48 and 72 h. However, the gene and protein expression of Bcl-2 increased significantly compared with the control group, peaking at 24 h. Subsequently, the expression levels gradually decreased (P<0.05; Fig. 4).
Assessment of Smad4 mRNA and protein levels
At 72 h after transfection of HGFs with Lv-Smad4, the expression efficiency of enhanced green fluorescent protein was ~90% (Fig. 5). Furthermore, gene and protein expression analysis revealed that the levels of Smad4 (Fig. 6) were significantly upregulated in the Lv-Smad4 group compared with the Lv-control and blank control groups (P<0.01). The expression levels in the Lv-control group significantly decreased compared with the control cells (P<0.05), which indicated that the lentiviral system effectively delivered the exogenous Smad4 gene.
Smad4 overexpression inhibits the effects of compressive force on HGF proliferation
The CCK-8 assay results showed that the absorbance values of HGFs increased with the increased culture time (P<0.05; Fig. 7A). In the first two days, the difference in optical density (OD) values between the Lv-Smad4, Lv-control and control groups were not statistically significant. However, the OD value of the Lv-Smad4 group decreased compared with the Lv-control and control groups from day 3onwards (P<0.05). Additionally, all three groups were significantly different to each other from day 5 onwards, with the highest OD values in the control group and the lowest in the Lv-Smad4 group (P<0.05). Furthermore, the CCK-8 results revealed the participation of Smad4 in HGF proliferation induced by compressive force, as shown in Fig. 7B. There was no significant increase in HGF proliferation in the Lv-Smad4 group after 24 h of compressive force compared with before force was applied (P>0.05; Fig. 7B). Conversely, in the Lv-control and Lv-Smad4 groups, stimulation with continuous compressive force for 24 h significantly increased HGF proliferation (P<0.05; Fig. 7B).
Smad4 overexpression reverses the expression of caspase-3 and Bcl-2 in HGFs
To determine whether Smad4 mediates caspase-3 and Bcl-2 expression under compressive force, Smad4 was overexpressed in HGFs. Although continuous compressive force stimulation for 24 h significantly decreased the expression of Smad4 in the Lv-Smad4 group, Smad4 expression was upregulated compared with in the Lv-control and control groups. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that with or without compressive force stimulation, the expression levels of Bcl-2 and caspase-3 were downregulated and upregulated, respectively, in the Lv-Smad4 group compared with the control group (Fig. 8). These findings indicated that Smad4 is an important apoptosis-associated factor in HGFs; compressive force inhibited HGF apoptosis and promoted proliferation by downregulating the expression of Smad4.
Discussion
Clinically, gingival hyperplasia and accumulation of the stressed side are commonly found during orthodontic treatment (1-4). Exploring this phenomenon, Schwarz (31) reported that when the orthodontic force did not exceed the end capillary pressure of the periodontal ligament on the root surface of the tooth, it was most conducive to the movement of teeth, and exceeding this threshold results in the necrosis of periodontal tissue. In the human body and most mammals, this pressure is ~20-26 g/cm2. Therefore, it has been proposed that under reasonable pressure, weight loading models can more effectively simulate changes in the periodontal tissue on the compressed side of the body (32,33). For example, Kook et al (34) and Li et al (35) used force-loading models to demonstrate that the proliferative ability of periodontal ligament fibroblasts is enhanced under suitable compressive pressure stimulation. In addition, Baker et al (36) reported that the elastic modulus of porous PLGA scaffolds is ~4 MPa, which is close to the elastic modulus of human gingival tissue (37). Therefore, the present study was conducted based on these findings and early experimental results of our research group, such as a PLGA-HGFs 3D culture model, an optimal value of 25 g/cm2 and high expression of TGF-β1 (10).
Studies have found that Smad4 is closely related to cell proliferation and apoptosis (15-17). It has been found in tumor research that Smad4 is a tumor suppressor gene, and its decreased or absent expression in a variety of tumors has been found to lead to the abnormal proliferation of tissues and cells (19,20); however, it has been found in some studies of cardiovascular diseases that TGF-β1/Smad4 can inhibit cell apoptosis. For example, Yin et al (38) silenced Smad4 in human aortic vascular smooth muscle cells (HASMCs) and found that low expression of Smad4 decreased the anti-angiotensin stimulation ability of HASMCs, leading to HASMC migration and apoptosis. Therefore, studies have suggested that the effect of TGF-β1/Smad4 signaling on cell apoptosis is dependent on the cell type and environment.
In the present study, HGF proliferation and expression of Smad4 were time-dependent. The proliferation ability of HGF enhanced and peaked after 24 h of compressive force, then began to decrease with longer exposure. Conversely, the expression of Smad4 decreased and reached a nadir at 24 h, then began to increase. These results suggested that HGFs underwent a series of proliferative and apoptotic processes under compressive force that involved Smad4.
To further explore the relationship between Smad4 and cell proliferation, Smad4 was overexpressed in HGFs. The results of CCK-8 assays revealed that proliferation in the Lv-Smad4 group was significantly decreased compared with in the Lv-control and the control groups from day 3, indicating that Smad4 inhibited the proliferation of HGFs compared with normal cells, which may be due to increased apoptosis. Additionally, the proliferation of HGFs under compressive force was significantly inhibited in the Lv-Smad4 group. These results suggested that Smad4 is associated with the proliferation and apoptosis of HGFs under compressive force, thus highlighting Smad4 as a pro-apoptotic factor in HGFs.
Apoptosis is a gene-regulated programmed cell death process; it is a physiological response of cells to adapt to the environment and maintain the stability of the internal environment of the body (39). There are two main pathways of apoptosis: The mitochondrial pathway and the death receptor pathway. Caspase and Bcl-2 family proteins are involved in both apoptosis pathways (40,41). Caspase-3 plays a key role in promoting apoptosis and is considered the executor of apoptosis (42). The Bcl-2 protein family is a large complex family, mostly located in the mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum and continuous perinuclear membrane, that mediates the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway (43). Bcl-2 can inhibit apoptosis and is one of the most important oncogenes in apoptotic research (44). It has been reported that downregulated expression of Smad4 in breast cancer can inhibit cell apoptosis by decreasing caspase-3 and caspase-9, and promoting Bcl-2 expression (45). Overexpression of Smad4 in human vascular endothelial cells has shown that Smad4 can inhibit endothelial cell proliferation by promoting caspase-3 activation and blocking the cell cycle (46). However, the role of compressive force and Smad4 in the apoptosis of HGFs, and the relationship between Smad4, caspase-3 and Bcl-2, remain undetermined.
In the present study, the expression of Bcl-2 and caspase-3 were also highly time-dependent. The expression of Bcl-2 was upregulated under compressive force and peaked at 24 h, at which point it began to decrease. Conversely, the expression of caspase-3 decreased, reaching its lowest point after 24 h of compressive force stimulation, at which point it began to increase. These results suggested that Bcl-2 and caspase-3 were involved in apoptotic processes in HGFs under compressive force.
It was further shown that, compared with normal cells, caspase-3 expression was increased in the Lv-Smad4 group, while Bcl-2 expression was downregulated. This suggested that Smad4 regulated the expression of caspase-3 and Bcl-2 in HGFs without compressive force. Furthermore, it was found that Lv-Smad4 cells exhibited downregulated expression of Bcl-2 and upregulated expression of caspase-3 compared with Lv-control and control group cells under compressive force, further suggesting that compressive force regulated the expression of caspase-3 and Bcl-2 via Smad4, thereby regulating HGF proliferation and apoptosis.
In conclusion, the present findings indicated that Smad4 promoted HGF proliferation by regulating caspase-3 and Bcl-2 under compressive force. Therefore, Smad4 may be an important target for preventing gingival hyperplasia after orthodontic treatment. However, there were certain limitations to the present study. For example, proliferation and apoptosis were only analyzed using CCK-8 assays; additional methods should be used, such as flow cytometry. In addition, the discussion on Smad4 was limited to enhancing the expression of Smad4; subsequent studies should further validate these findings by silencing Smad4.
Funding
The present study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81070860) and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province (grant no. 2013GXNSFAA019183).
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Authors' contributions
SZ conceived and coordinated the study, designed, performed and analyzed the experiments, and wrote the paper. LN, YW, LW and SM collected and analyzed data, and revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript, LN and SM confirm the authenticity of all the raw data.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The present study was approved by the Hospital Institutional Review Board (approval no. 20150304-22) of Guangxi Medical University. All donors and their guardians signed an informed consent form.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Acknowledgments
Not applicable.
References
|
Dutra EH, Ahmida A, Lima A, Schneider S, Nanda R and Yadav S: The effects of alveolar decortications on orthodontic tooth movement and bone remodelling in rats. Eur J Orthod. 40:423–429. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
|
Massaeli H, Viswanathan D, Pillai DG and Mesaeli N: Endoplasmic reticulum stress enhances endocytosis in calreticulin deficient cells. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 1866:727–736. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Redlich M, Shoshan S and Palmon A: Gingival response to orthodontic force. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 116:152–158. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Erkan M, Pikdoken L and Usumez S: Gingival response to mandibular incisor intrusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 132:143.e9–13. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Kalra A, Jaggi N, Bansal M, Goel S, Medsinge SV, Abraham R and Jasoria G: Comparison of rate of canine retraction into recent extraction site with and without gingival fiberotomy: A clinical study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 14:419–426. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Krishnan V, Ambili R, Davidovitch Z and Murphy NC: Gingiva and orthodontic treatment. Semin Orthodont. 13:257–271. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Bartold PM and McCulloch CA: Information generation and processing systems that regulate periodontal structure and function. Periodontol 2000. 63:7–13. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Katsumi A, Naoe T, Matsushita T, Kaibuchi K and Schwartz MA: Integrin activation and matrix binding mediate cellular responses to compressive stretch. J Biol Chem. 280:16546–16549. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Jiang N, Guo W, Chen M, Zheng Y, Zhou J, Kim SG, Embree MC, Songhee Song K, Marao HF and Mao JJ: Periodontal ligament and alveolar bone in health and adaptation: Tooth movement. Front Oral Biol. 18:1–8. 2016. | |
|
Nan L, Zheng Y, Liao N, Li S, Wang Y, Chen Z, Wei L, Zhao S and Mo S: Mechanical force promotes the proliferation and extracellular matrix synthesis of human gingival fibroblasts cultured on 3D PLGA scaffolds via TGF-β expression. Mol Med Rep. 19:2107–2114. 2019.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Aukkarasongsup P, Haruyama N, Matsumoto T, Shiga M and Moriyama K: Periostin inhibits hypoxia-induced apoptosis in human periodontal ligament cells via TGF-β signaling. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 441:126–132. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Xu H, He Y, Feng JQ, Shu R, Liu Z, Li J, Wang Y, Xu Y, Zeng H, Xu X, et al: Wnt3α and transforming growth factor-β induce myofibroblast differentiation from periodontal ligament cells via different pathways. Exp Cell Res. 353:55–62. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Moustakas A, Souchelnytskyi S and Heldin CH: Smad regulation in TGF-beta signal transduction. J Cell Sci. 114:4359–4369. 2001. | |
|
Singh P, Srinivasan R and Wig JD: The Smad family and its role in pancreatic cancer. Indian J Cancer. 48:351–360. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Mccarthy AJ and Chetty R: Smad4/DPC4. J Clin Pathol. 71:661–664. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Duda D, Sunamura M, Lefter LP, Furukawa T, Yokoyama T, Yatsuoka T, Abe T, Inoue H, Motoi F, Egawa S, et al: Restoration of SMAD4 by gene therapy reverses the invasive phenotype in pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells. Oncogene. 22:6857–6864. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Hruban RH, Offerhaus GJ, Kern SE, Goggins M, Wilentz RE and Yeo CJ: Tumor-Suppressor genes in pancreatic cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 5:383–391. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Michot C, Le Goff C, Mahaut C, Afenjar A, Brooks AS, Campeau PM, Destree A, Di Rocco M, Donnai D, Hennekam R, et al: Myhre and LAPS syndromes: Clinical and molecular review of 32 patients. Eur J Hum Genet. 22:1272–1277. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ahmed S, Bradshaw AD, Gera S, Dewan MZ and Xu R: The TGF-β/Smad4 signaling pathway in pancreatic carcinogenesis and its clinical significance. J Clin Med. 6:52017. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Woodford-Richens KL, Rowan AJ, Gorman P, Halford S, Bicknell DC, Wasan HS, Roylance RR, Bodmer WF and Tomlinson IP: SMAD4 mutations in colorectal cancer probably occur before chromosomal instability, but after divergence of the microsatellite instability pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 98:9719–9723. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Shihab FS, Yamamoto T, Nast CC, Cohen AH, Noble NA, Gold LI and Border WA: Transforming growth factor-beta and matrix protein expression in acute and chronic rejection of human renal allografts. J Am Soc Nephrol. 6:286–294. 1995.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhang B, Zhang B, Chen X, Bae S, Singh K, Washington MK and Datta PK: Loss of Smad4 in colorectal cancer induces resistance to 5-fluorouracil through activating Akt pathway. Br J Cancer. 110:946–957. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Huang Y, Chen C, Ren J and Ren T: The preparation of poly(lactide-co-glycolide)(PLGA)/modified nano-hydroxyapatite(MHA) composite scaffold for tissue engineering. J Funct Materials. 38:629–632. 2007.In Chinese. | |
|
Sachar A, Strom TA, San Miguel S, Serrano MJ, Svoboda KK and Liu X: Cell-matrix and cell-cell interactions of human gingival fibroblasts on three-dimensional nanofibrous gelatin scaffolds. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 8:862–873. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Wei G, Jin Q, Giannobile WV and Ma PX: Nano-fibrous scaffold for controlled delivery of recombinant human PDGF-BB. J Control Release. 112:103–110. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Guo N, Zhang Q, Sun Y and Yang H: Separation and identification of acylated leuprorelin inside PLGA microspheres. Int J Pharm. 560:273–281. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Xie H, Gu Z, Li C, Franco C, Wang J, Lia L, Meredith N, Ye Q and Wang C: A novel bioceramic scaffold integrating silk fibroin in calcium polyphosphate for bone tissue-engineering. Ceram Int. 42:2386–2392. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Alyaa A, Mehjabeen A, Kannan M, Yeb Q and Blawertc C: Biodegradable polymer for sealing porous PEO layer on pure magnesium: An in vitro degradation study. Appl Surf Sci. 301:463–467. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Liu Z, Yin X, Ye Q, He W, Ge M, Zhou X, Hu J and Zou S: Periodontal regeneration with stem cells-seeded collagen-hydroxyapatite scaffold. J Biomater Appl. 31:121–131. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Schwarz AM: Tissue changes incidental to orthodontic tooth movement. Int J Orthod Oral Surg Radiog. 18:331–352. 1932. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Otero L, García DA and Wilches-Buitrago L: Expression and presence of OPG and RANKL mRNA and protein in human periodontal ligament with orthodontic force. Gene Regul Syst Bio. 10:15–20. 2016.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Grant M, Wilson J, Rock P and Chapple I: Induction of cytokines, MMP9, TIMPs, RANKL and OPG during orthodontic tooth movement. Eur J Orthod. 35:644–651. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Kook SH, Jang YS and Lee JC: Human periodontal ligament fibroblasts stimulate osteoclastogenesis in response to compression force through TNF-α-mediated activation of CD4+ T cells. J Cell Biochem. 112:2891–2901. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Li M, Yi J, Yang Y, Zheng W, Li Y and Zhao Z: Investigation of optimal orthodontic force at the cellular level through three-dimensionally cultured periodontal ligament cells. Eur J Orthod. 38:366–372. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Baker SC, Rohman G, Southgate J and Cameron NR: The relationship between the mechanical properties and cell behaviour on PLGA and PCL scaffolds for bladder tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 30:1321–1328. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Subbarayan R, Murugan Girija D, Mukherjee J, Mamidanna SRR and Ranga Rao S: Comparision of gingival and umbilical cord stem cells based on its modulus and neuronal differentiation. J Cell Biochem. 118:2000–2008. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yin P, Wang Y and Shen Z: SMAD4 gene silencing promotes human vascular smooth muscle cells migration and apoptosis. J Jiangsu Univ (Medicine Edition). 28:26–29. 2018.In Chinese. | |
|
Grilo AL and Mantalaris A: Apoptosis: A mammalian cell bioprocessing perspective. Biotechnol Adv. 37:459–475. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Cohen JJ, Duke RC, Fadok VA and Sellins KS: Apoptosis and programmed cell death in immunity. Annu Rev Immunol. 10:267–293. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhang Y, Alexander PB and Wang XF: TGF-beta family signaling in the control of cell proliferation and survival. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 9:a0221452017. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Mcilwain DR, Berger T and Mak TW: Caspase functions in cell death and disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 7:a0267162015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ashkenazi A, Fairbrother WJ, Leverson JD and Souers AJ: From basic apoptosis discoveries to advanced selective BCL-2 family inhibitors. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 16:273–284. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Taylor RC, Cullen SP and Martin SJ: Apoptosis: Controlled demolition at the cellular level. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 9:231–241. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Liu N, Li Y, Li R, Sun L and Liu X: Influence of silencing Smad4 gene in proliferation and apoptosis of breast carcinoma MCF-7 cells. J Jilin Univ (Medical Edition). 43:887–892. 2017.In Chinese. | |
|
Demagny H and De Robertis EM: Point mutations in the tumor suppressor Smad4/DPC4 enhance its phosphorylation by GSK3 and reversibly inactivate TGF-β signaling. Mol Cell Oncol. 3:e10251812015. View Article : Google Scholar |
