Open Access

Role of dendritic cell‑derived exosomes in allergic rhinitis (Review)

  • Authors:
    • Chenglin Kang
    • Haipeng He
    • Peng Liu
    • Yue Liu
    • Xiaomei Li
    • Jin Zhang
    • Hong Ran
    • Xianhai Zeng
    • Hailiang Zhao
    • Jiangqi Liu
    • Shuqi Qiu
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: October 20, 2023
  • Article Number: 117
  • Copyright: © Kang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common pathological condition in otorhinolaryngology. Its prevalence has been increasing worldwide and is becoming a major burden to the world population. Dendritic cells (DCs) are typically activated and matured after capturing, phagocytosing, and processing allergens during the immunopathogenesis of AR. In addition, the process of DC activation and maturation is accompanied by the production of exosomes, which are cell‑derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) that can carry proteins, lipids, nucleic acids, and other cargoes involved in intercellular communication and material transfer. In particular, DC‑derived exosomes (Dex) can participate in allergic immune responses, where the biological substances carried by them can have potentially important implications for both the pathogenesis and treatment of AR. Dex can also be exploited to carry anti‑allergy agents to effectively treat AR. This provides a novel method to explore the pathogenesis of and treatment strategies for AR further. Therefore, the present review focuses on the origin, composition, function, and biological characteristics of DCs, exosomes, and Dex, in addition to the possible relationship between Dex and AR.

1. Introduction

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the nasal mucosa mediated by immunoglobulin E (IgE) (1). Dendritic cells (DCs), which are a major subtype of antigen-presenting cells (APCs), serve a key role in the immunopathogenesis of AR (1,2). When allergens enter the body, they are presented by DCs to CD4 T cells to trigger allergic inflammatory responses, leading to the activation and maturation of DCs (2,3). Exosomes are secreted during the maturation and differentiation of DCs in AR (4,5). However, almost all cells and not only DCs can produce exosomes (5-8). Exosomes are cell-derived, nm-sized extracellular vesicles (EVs) that are formed through the endocytosis and inward budding of the endosomal membrane mediated by extracellular components and cell surface proteins. They are distributed in almost all bodily fluids and have been previously associated with the occurrence and progression of several diseases (9,10). Exosomes can carry important signaling molecules for intercellular communication and material transfer (11). DC-derived exosomes (Dex) are nano-scale lipid-membrane vesicles formed within DCs by the inward budding of the endosomal membrane after DCs receive immune signals (12,13). The composition and function of DCs and Dex are strikingly similar. Dex, which mimics the biology of donor DCs, can transfer functional major histocompatibility complexes (MHC) to DCs, leading to the activation of CD8 and CD4 T cells (14-16). In addition, Dex carry MHC and T-cell costimulatory molecules to present allergens to induce the production of Th2 cytokines in allergic donors, which are important immunostimulatory factors of anaphylactic immune responses (17,18). Therefore, allergen-carrying Dex may be important targets for AR immunotherapy (17,18). Since the diverse and complex mode of information transfer between Dex and various cells may serve an integral role in the occurrence and progression of AR, Dex engineered to carry anti-allergic drugs may have the potential to interrupt the allergic and immune processes underlying AR on a novel level (5,19).

2. Origin and function of DCs

DCs are a class of bone marrow-derived cells that are typically found in blood, tissues, and lymphoid organs. They primarily initiate immune responses by presenting antigens to naive T cells in lymphoid tissues (20,21). Once activated, DCs increase the expression levels of the MHC peptide complex and costimulatory molecules, allowing them to efficiently activate T cells (22). As the most efficient type of APCs, DCs serve a central role in the immune system. They are typically classified according to their location, function, and cell surface marker profile, namely plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs) and conventional DCs (cDCs; Fig. 1) (20,23-25). DCs can develop from different hematopoietic or myelopoietic progenitors, where to the best of our knowledge, no interconversion from one type to another has been found to date (26).

pDCs are also known as 'lymphoid DCs' and form a subset of DCs with antigen-presenting potential, accounting for <0.3% of all blood mononuclear cells (27,28). Although they share a similar origin with cDCs, pDCs have a different life cycle, since they primarily accumulate in the blood and lymphoid tissues, entering lymph nodes through the blood circulation (29). pDCs can develop in situ in the bone marrow or from common lymphoid progenitors (CLPs; Fig. 1) (24,30). They acquire the functions of APCs after activation, where their expression combination of costimulatory molecules CD40, CD80, and/or CD86 can dictate which specific T cell function is activated (24,31). After recognizing foreign nucleic acids, pDCs will produce large quantities of IFN-I and acquire the ability to present foreign antigens, which serve an important role in antiviral immunity (29,30). In addition, pDCs can directly inhibit allergic immune responses in the airway in addition to indirectly promoting the induction of regulatory T (Treg) cells in mice (32,33).

The majority of cDCs are short-lived hematopoietic cells that are constantly replaced by blood-derived precursors (29). cDCs account for a much larger proportion of DCs compared with pDCs and are typically distributed in most lymphoid tissues and non-lymphoid tissues. With highly efficient antigen-presenting ability, they can capture relevant antigens and present them to T lymphocytes after intracellular processing (29). Serving the role of 'sentinels', cDCs can respond to environmental stimuli and alert the immune system to the presence of foreign antigens, including allergens. cDCs have been reported to be required for the initiation of Th2 immune responses (24,32). Allergens can either signal directly through specific receptors on cDCs or indirectly by inducing cytokine production in surrounding tissues or inflammatory cells, which can then compel cDCs into promoting Th2 responses (32).

DCs in different types of tissues appear to serve different cellular functions, where various stimuli can induce the maturation of specific and distinct DC phenotypes that mediate different functions (34). However, during the resting state, when the DCs are immature (imDCs), they can acquire self-antigens but do not activate T cells. After being stimulated by injury, pathogens, or inflammatory cytokines, imDCs are then transformed into mature DCs (mDCs), which then migrate to secondary lymphoid tissues, where they prime naive T cells into initiating adaptive immune responses (35,36). In particular, only viable, mature, and fully functional DCs migrating into lymph nodes can stimulate T-cell responses (35). The maturation of DCs is accompanied by the enhanced expression of MHC II, costimulatory molecules, and chemokine receptors (37). It is mainly during the maturation of DCs that exosomes are produced.

3. Exosomes

Exosome biogenesis, release, and composition

Exosomes are EVs with lipid bilayer structures formed by extracellular components together with proteins, lipids, metabolites, small molecules, ions, and other liquids through the endocytosis and inward budding of the plasma membrane (9,38). The inward budding of the plasma membrane then forms early-sorting endosomes (ESEs) in association with the trans-Golgi network, mitochondria, and endoplasmic reticulum. These mature ESEs subsequently form late-sorting endosomes (LSEs) under the control of the endocytosis-sorting complex and other related proteins. After the specific sorting and encapsulation of proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids, LSEs then form multiple intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) through a second indentation. This process allows for the entry of cytoplasmic components into the newly formed ILVs, which are the precursors of exosomes (6,9,39,40). This sequential invagination of the plasma membrane eventually leads to the development of multiple ILVs into multivesicular bodies. They can either fuse with lysosomes or autophagosomes for degradation or fuse with the plasma membrane to release the vesicles out of the cell through extravasation (Fig. 2) (41-44).

Exosomes contain a variety of components, including lipids, proteins, amino acids, metabolites, RNA, and DNA. The majority of these components can exert biological functions and define the transport capacity of the exosome (45,46). Proteins that are commonly found in exosomes include transmembrane proteins CD9, CD63, CD81, CD82, CD151, Ras-related proteins, immunomodulatory proteins, heat shock proteins (HSP), cell type-specific molecules, proteases, MHC molecules, tumor susceptibility gene 101 protein, apoptosis-linked gene 2-interacting protein X, integrins, and flotillin. They can be found on the surfaces, in between lipid bilayers, or within exosomes, with the yield of protein content from exosomes dependent on the type of cells that secreted them (9,47,48). Lipids form another important component that makes up the exosomes. They not only contribute to their support structures but are also important participants in their formation and release into the extracellular environment (49,50). Major lipid components of exosomes include sphingomyelin (SM), phosphatidylserine (PS), phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylinositol (PI), phosphatidic acid, and cholesterol (Table I). The distribution of lipids in the exosome bilayer is typically asymmetric, where SM is primarily located in the outer layer, whilst PS is largely distributed in the inner layer (Fig. 3) (49-51).

Table I

Primary components within exosomesa.

Table I

Primary components within exosomesa.

ProteinRas-related proteinsRab GTPase, Annexins, Syntenin-1, TSG101, ALIX, Syndecan-1, endosomal sorting complexes required for transport proteins(9,10,46,52,53)
Exosomes surface proteinsTetraspanins, integrins, immunomodulatory proteins, membrane transport proteins, surface proteoglycans, antigen presentation proteins, epithelial cell adhesion molecule, epidermal growth factor receptor, insulin-like growth factor receptor 1(9,54)
Intracellular proteinsCytoskeletal proteins, HSPs 27, 60, 70 and 90, nuclear proteins, enzymes, RNA-binding proteins, apoptotic proteins, signal transducers(9,10,54,55)
Markers for exosomesCD9, CD63, CD81, CD82, CD151, flotillin, TSG101, ALIX(9,10,47,52,54)
OthersHemoglobin, histones, actins, tubulins, inter-α-trypsin inhibitor, gelsolin, talin 1, WD repeat domain 1(53)
Nucleic acidRNAmRNA, microRNA, pre-RNA, Y-RNA, circular RNA, long non-coding RNA, transfer RNA, mtRNA, transfer RNA-derived small RNAs, small nucleolar RNAs, Piwi-interacting RNA(9,10,43,46, 53,54,56-60)
DNAmtDNA, double-stranded DNA, single-stranded DNA, viral DNA, genomic DNA, cell free DNA(9,53,54,56)
LipidN/ASphingomyelin, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidic acid, phosphatodylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, ceramide, cholesterol, Cardiolipin, diglyceride, monoglyceride, phosphatidylglycerol, triglyceride(10,43,50,53)
Amino acidsN/AValine, isoleucine, phenylalanine, tyrosine, homocysteine, cystine(52,61,62)
MetabolitesN/ALipid fatty acids, benzene, organic acids, carbohydrates, fatty acyls, carnitines, biogenic amines, vitamins(9,10,63,64)
GlycansN/APolylactosamine, high mannose N-glycan, complex type N-glycan(53,65)

a According to previous reports, 4,563 proteins, 194 lipids, 1,639 mRNAs, 764 miRNAs and 196 metabolites were found in exosomes. Amongst this list, syntenin-1 appears to be the most abundant protein, whilst organic acids and their derivatives and fatty acids are the most abundant metabolites in exosomes of different origins (52,55,63). TSG101, tumor susceptibility gene 101; ALIX, apoptosis-linked gene 2-interacting protein X; HSP, heat shock proteins; mtRNA, mitochondrial RNA; miR/miRNA, microRNA.

However, it is important to note that exosomes from different sources can contain different ingredients, even if they originated from the same cell. As such, exosomal contents mostly likely depend on the status of the cell from which they were produced (8,45,48). They may vary under different physiological or pathological conditions, where changes in the external environment (such as various modes of stress, hypoxia, and inflammation) will influence the molecular profile of exosomes (46,57). The different molecular compositions of exosomes will likely have an impact on their transport capacity and messaging function.

Biological functions of exosomes

Exosomes were initially considered to be carriers of waste products from intracellular metabolism (66). However, subsequent studies have revealed that exosomes can serve to not only remove waste products of metabolism from the cell but also perform a variety of functions, such as intercellular communication, transport of intracellular, extracellular substances, and genetic material, as well as maintenance of cellular stability and removing cellular debris (67-70). In addition, exosomes can regulate innate and adaptive immune responses, specifically in antigen presentation and intercellular signaling. Akin to 'communicators', exosomes can serve as intercellular immune mediators regulating cell proliferation, differentiation, and migration, allowing them to mature and adapt rapidly to environmental changes (71,72). Although the biological functions of exosomes can vary depending on their origin, they have important reported roles in cell differentiation, maturation, and apoptosis (8,73). The core functions of exosomes are mainly determined by the proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids contained within their parental cells (73).

Exosome isolation and purification methods

Exosomes with multiple biological functions can be used for the diagnosis, treatment and prognostic evaluation of numerous diseases such as cardiovascular disease, neurodegenerative diseases, and HIV (74,75). Efficient and high purity but simple methods for exosome isolation and purification form the first step for optimizing the field of exosome research (74). Over the past decade, rapid progress has been made in the study of exosomes. However, several outstanding obstacles must be overcome, such as cumbersome separation methods, low speed, low yield, and purity (76). Common exosome isolation and purification methods include ultracentrifugation, ultrafiltration, precipitation, immunoaffinity capture, and volume exclusion chromatography (75). All these aforementioned methods share similar disadvantages (Fig. 4; Table II). As this field develops, emerging methods for exosome isolation and purification are currently being found, such as microfluidics, electricity, centrifugal force, and acoustic force, which can be exploited to isolate exosomes of high purity in a high-throughput manner (Fig. 4; Table II) (74).

Table II

Comparison of methods used for the extraction of exosomesa.

Table II

Comparison of methods used for the extraction of exosomesa.

UltracentrifugationMost commonly used, wide range of applications, low costLow quantity, low recovery, low purity, costly instrumentation, lengthy and laborious processing, requirement for large amounts of samples(43,46,54, 77-79)
Density gradient centrifugationEasy implementation, high practicability, high purityTime consuming, dependability(43,46,54,78)
FiltrationUniform sizePossible blockages, low recovery(43,46,54,80)
Co-precipitationSimple, fast, reproducibility, high yieldLow quality, lack of specificity(43,46,54)
Immunoaffinity enrichmentHigh purity, simpleNarrow range of applications, not applicable to large scale, high cost, low yield(43,46,54)
Field flow fractionationWide range of separation, wide varietyTime consuming, requirement for specialized equipment(43,46)
Asymmetric-flow field-flow fractionationEfficient, high reproducible, fast, simple, label-free, gentleLow resolution, possible irreproducibility(53,80)
Contact-free sortingFast and easy to operate, label-free, high separation yield and resolutionRequirement for specialized system(81)
Ultrafast-isolation systemRemove small particles, enhanced speed, yield, and purityRequirement for specialized system(77)
Size-exclusion chromatographyHigh yield, low cost, reproducibility, no damage, high recoveryComplex(43,54,79,82)
Microfluidics-based techniquesLow cost, efficient, high speed, accuracyEquipment complexity, difficult to operate(54)
Membrane-based separationHigh purity, fastMay contain other impurities with membrane(74)
Commercial kitEasy to operate, time savingExpensive, uneven extraction(6,74)

a Exosomes can be isolated and purified using other methods not shown in this Table. Different isolation and purification methods can comple- ment each other and/or be used in combination to obtain more comprehensive information about exosomes.

4. Composition and features of Dex

Dex are nm-sized vesicles formed within the cell by the inward budding of the endosomal membrane (12). There are a variety of proteins in Dex, such as integrin α and β chains (αMβ2), immunoglobulin family member intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM), and milk fat globule epidermal growth factor 8 (MFG-E8), cytoskeleton proteins and anti-apoptosis-related proteins, which dock their membranes onto those of host cells. CD9, CD63, and CD81 are also components that are frequently found on the Dex surface membrane (83-85). The composition of Dex membranes differs from those of DCs in that they are richer in sphingolipid content but poorer in phosphatidylcholine content, in addition to being deprived of cholesterol (13). The lipid composition of Dex membranes can have an impact on their function (86). HSP70, HSP90, and heat shock cognate protein 73 have also been found in Dex, which can increase the immunogenicity of Dex (87). There is also a variety of different types of RNAs in Dex, which can transfer onto other cells. In particular, Dex has been documented to contain several immunomodulatory molecules with different structures and biochemical properties, depending on the intracellular origin of Dex (88). The composition and features of Dex are shown in Table III.

Table III

Primary components of Dex.

Table III

Primary components of Dex.

MHC-peptide complexesMHC I, MHC IIInitiate antigen-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells, modulate the function of T cells, enhance the ability of antigen presentation, trigger effective antigen-specific immune response(54,89)
Costimulatory moleculesCD80, CD86, CD40Initiate and activate T cells(12,90)
RNAmicroRNA, mRNARegulate the expression levels of relevant genes, post-translational modification, post-transcriptional regulation, communication between DCs, transport function(12,13, 54,85)
Integrinsα and β chainsTarget to recipient cells(89)
Intercellular adhesion molecule 1Immunoglobulin family memberTarget and dock to recipient cells, activate DCs and increase the number of CD8 T cells, Increase the combination of Dex and APC, induce cell migration(54,57, 89)
Milk fat globule epidermal growth factor 8Immunoglobulin family memberTarget and dock to recipient cells, bind phosphatidylserine on Dex's outer membrane, link integrins to promote Dex uptake, enhanced APC uptake of Dex(12,85)
LipidSphingomyelin, phosphatidylinositol, diaglyceride, phospholipids, phosphatidylethanolamineStability in the circulation(13,85, 91)
TetraspaninsCD9, CD37, CD63, CD81, CD82Abundantly expressed in the surface membrane of Dex, contribute to Dex-targeted APC(85)
Heat shock proteinsHSP70, HSP90Assist MHC molecules to load antigens, Enhance Dex immunogenicity, promote the activation of natural killer cells and enhance their cytotoxicity(12,54, 85)
Cytoskeletal proteinsTubulin, actin, actin-binding proteinCytoskeleton(85)
Membrane transport and fusion proteinsAnnexins, RAB proteinsTransport function(85)
Anti-apoptosis related proteinsThioredoxin peroxidase II, apoptosis-linked gene 2-interacting protein X, galectin-3Resist apoptosis(85)
Signal transduction pathways proteinsG proteins, kinasesInvolve in signal transduction(12,85)

[i] Dex, dendritic cell-derived exosome; MHC, major histocompatibility complex; DCs, dendritic cells; APCs, antigen-presenting cells; HSP, heat shock protein.

5. DCs and Dex

DCs can secrete different types of exosomes to regulate the adaptive immune response. In addition, exosomes from different sources can modulate the differentiation, maturation, and function of DCs (77). Dex, in addition to the known immunostimulatory capabilities of DCs, has been reported to regulate a variety of immune processes, including antigen presentation, immunomodulation, and signal transduction (12,92). With the ability to activate naive T-cells and facilitate the transfer of MHC complexes between DCs, Dex can be produced in large quantities and efficiently diffuse into tissues, rendering them potentially more potent compared with DCs in activating T lymphocytes and natural killer cells (93-95). The immunomodulatory effect of Dex is closely associated with the maturation status of DCs (96). imDCs and mDCs secrete exosomes with similar morphology, where the potency of exosomes secreted by mDCs is substantially higher compared with that of exosomes from imDCs (97). In general, exosomes from mDCs (mDex) have higher levels of immune-related molecules and superior antigen presentation compared with those from imDCs, which are prone to exosome production but do not effectively stimulate T-cell responses (84,93,94,97).

Dex can transfer MHC I and II complexes to DCs to amplify the immune response (84,98). LPS has been found to promote Dex production from DCs, which contain high concentrations of MHC molecules (86). In addition, Dex has been reported to stimulate T-cells and enhance their activity, thereby potentiating the immune response (86). The shuttling of miRNAs between DCs using Dex can serve as a means of communication and post-transcriptional modification, which may regulate the overall function of DCs (87). Rao et al (99) previously found that Dex can selectively enter DCs, since they have a high affinity for DCs and can act on them to alter the distribution and differentiation of T-cells by encapsulating triptolide. In another previous study, Zhang et al (100) found that Dex contains cargoes secreted by DCs that can activate Treg cells, which leads to the improvement of inflammation. However, it is important to note that Dex from different subsets of DCs may mediate different functions, ultimately leading to different downstream outcomes (14).

6. Dex and AR

DCs have been extensively reported to be involved in the pathogenesis of AR. Therefore, it is highly likely that Dex will play a potentially important role in AR. Dex can be recaptured by DCs and remain on the cell surface, where they can present allergens and induce Th2 cytokine production in allergic donors to elicit allergic immune responses (18,101). Dex share similarities with DCs in promoting allergic immune responses (102). Dex can present antigens directly to T-cells or transport MHC complexes back to the surfaces of DCs for presentation to T-cells after docking onto APCs (103). CD40 on Dex has been found to induce T-cell responses to promote IgE production (104-106). In addition, CD63 and CD81 in Dex have been shown to inhibit FcεRI-induced degranulation by mast cells (MCs), which further affects signaling that normally mediates allergic inflammation (107). Costimulatory molecules, such as CD80 and CD86, on the Dex surface can also contribute to the maturation of DCs and promote Th2-type inflammation, leading to an imbalance in the differentiation of naive T-cells towards to Th2 subtype (108). In addition, CD80 and CD86 can activate allergen-specific Th2 cells to potentiate antigen-specific immune responses (109,110). By contrast, miRNAs in Dex can regulate serum IgE levels and the severity of allergy symptoms through blood, nasal mucosa, and nasal secretions in AR (111). Therefore, miRNA cargoes in Dex can be used to determine the extent of allergic inflammation and immune response (106). Changes in the expression levels of ICAM and MFG-E8 can also regulate the immune response (112). SM can drive allergic inflammation and promote airway hyperresponsiveness by serving as important signaling molecules for mediating inflammatory and immune responses (113-115). This suggests that a wide variety of cargoes carried by Dex can mediate an impact on AR, though different cargoes are likely to exert different effects on AR.

The immunostimulatory or suppressive function of Dex is dependent on the type or maturity stage of DCs that secrete them (116). Therefore, Dex in different states is also likely to have different effects on AR. Exosomes from imDCs (imDex), which primarily reduce T-cell-dependent immune activation, contribute to inhibiting the Th17 response whilst enhancing the population of Treg cells (15,117). By contrast, mDex can directly act on T-cells to exert specific immune responses (118). By functioning as an antigen-presenting molecule, Dex can modulate immunity and inflammation by perpetuating the response of Th2 cells to DCs (119). Dex carries leukotriene synthase, which stimulates granulocyte translocation to promote the recruitment and migration of immune cells to sites of inflammation (77,110,120). Choi et al (121) previously showed that DCs can excrete allergen-bound Dex, which can trigger the degranulation of adjacent MCs, leading to anaphylaxis. Furthermore, DCs have been reported to secrete TNF-α and other proinflammatory cytokines in response to Dex stimulation, leading to increased inflammation (122). In another study, Huang et al (123) activated DCs using thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), which induced Dex release and in turn promoted the proliferation and differentiation of CD4+ T-cells into the Th2 subtype through the OX40 ligand. These studies suggest that Dex can serve a significant role in the pathogenesis of AR through different types of cargo.

It is noteworthy that Dex can not only aggravate allergic reactions but also prevent them. Exosome-mediated transfer of allergens can promote allergic inflammation whereas regulatory and/or tolerogenic exosomes can suppress allergic and hypersensitivity reactions (19). Immunotherapy using Dex typically involves loading antigens directly into Dex or by modifying them (122). DCs can be modified to produce immunosuppressive Dex for the treatment of allergic inflammation (19). Dex can also be modified to carry anti-allergic drugs that can reduce allergic airway inflammation. In addition, lipids and proteins carried by Dex can enhance the permeability of biological membranes, which facilitates the efficiency of the delivery of the anti-allergic drugs they carry (19,124,125). In particular, mDex can promote the activation of T and B cells, leading to Th1-type immune responses and increased IgG titers (101). Since high IgG titers inhibit IgE-mediated effector function, it also suppresses the allergic inflammation that causes AR (101). In addition, imDCs treated with IL-10 and IL-4 have been reported to produce tolerogenic Dex to attenuate Th2 cell responses, thereby inhibiting inflammatory responses, in a mice model of delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) (84,126). The inhibitory capacity of IL-10-treated imDCs depends on the presence of CD80 and CD86 (127). Bianco et al (128) previously revealed that Dex overexpressing indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase has anti-inflammatory effects in a mouse model of DTH, which are dependent on the costimulatory molecule B7. Furthermore, Jia et al (129) showed that DCs-derived forkhead box p3-exosomes inhibited the proliferation of CD4+T cells, which in turn reduced the population of Th1 and Th17 cells whilst increasing that of Treg cells without affecting the level of Th2 cells. In another previous study, Yu et al (130) found that Dex modified with IL-2 can upregulate Treg differentiation to suppress allergic inflammation. Kim et al (131) also showed that genetically modified Dex derived from FasL-expressing DCs can exert anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects by suppressing DTH in an antigen-specific and MHC-II-dependent manner, though this process was independent of MHC I. These aforementioned findings suggest that Dex can either be processed or modified to inhibit allergic inflammation and thereby treat AR. Since Dex as a candidate for the treatment of AR is less susceptible to the effects of the surrounding environment (132), these findings could inspire further exploration into novel methods for treating AR with Dex.

Dex, with superior biocompatibility, biodegradability, and safety, can activate various immune cells and hold significant advantages in terms of delivery efficiency (85). Dex is more stable, can be stored for longer, and more immunogenic than DCs, which are highly susceptible to external factors that induce their maturation under pro-inflammatory conditions and promote immune responses, in addition to inducing their tolerance and moderate immune responses in response to IL-10 and TGF-β stimulation (85,133). These advantages of Dex suggest their viability for the treatment of AR. Treating AR with Dex not only eliminates the need for direct contact with natural allergens but is also less prone to triggering IgE/MC reactions. Therefore, they tend to be safer and more effective for the treatment of AR (19). The feasibility and safety of Dex therapy has the potential to be one of the alternatives to conventional treatments of AR (110). It is encouraging that Dex-based therapies are already in clinical trials (101). However, the scope of clinical trials for Dex is limited compared to DC vaccines, where their potential for application has not been fully evaluated (122). The role of exosomal vaccines is dependent on the environment, antigen, and cell type (122), which will require more in-depth research in the future.

7. Conclusions and future perspectives

From the aforementioned studies, it is likely that Dex is involved in the pathogenesis and can be exploited for the diagnosis and treatment of AR. However, their roles can vary during the different stages of AR. The role of Dex in AR opens another door to understanding the pathogenesis of AR, furthering the potential to design interventions and/or sensitizations to the immunotherapy of AR on a novel level. Although rapid progress has been made in the understanding of Dex (12), the clinical exploitation of Dex remains hindered by a series of problems, such as low efficiency, poor yields, difficulty associated with expression, and low purity (10,122). In addition, research on Dex biomarkers or targeted therapies for AR remains in the early stages and requires further development (77). The complexity of Dex requires thorough understanding. In addition, it remains necessary to carefully monitor the potential adverse events associated with Dex in future trials (12). Therefore, the role of Dex in AR will need to be enhanced further with a specific focus on the problems currently obstructing progress to adequately refine and improve the application of Dex in AR therapy. It is hoped that Dex can be used as an important marker for the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of patients with AR in the future, which requires more in-depth research on the isolation and purification, sensitivity, and cost-effectiveness of Dex. In addition, a more thorough exploration into the composition and mechanism of action mediated by the various cargoes contained within Dex needs to be performed.

Is it possible to adjust or change the composition and function of Dex as needed to diagnose or treat AR? It is possible to design Dex to stimulate or inhibit immune responses as needed? Can Dex be a candidate for the treatment of AR? How can Dex be produced for the personalized clinical diagnosis and treatment of AR according to the situation? These questions need to be addressed in future studies. A more thorough understanding of the role of Dex in AR could help prevent AR or develop more effective treatment strategies. This provides a novel insight for exploration into the pathogenesis of AR and offers a new direction for the efficient treatment of AR.

Overall, the application of Dex in the diagnosis and treatment of AR is a promising approach, where novel insights in this field will drive the development of new therapeutic or preventive measures. However, the role of Dex in AR warrants further investigation in the future.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors' contributions

CK and HH conceived and drafted the manuscript. CK, HH, JL, SQ, PL, YL, XL, JZ, HR, XZ, and HZ reviewed and edited the manuscript. Data authentication is not applicable. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


Not applicable.


This work was supported by grants Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81700888), Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (grant no. 2021A1515010971), Shenzhen Science and Technology Program for Basic Research (grant no. JCYJ20220531091417040), Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (grant no. JCYJ20210324142207019), Shenzhen Key Medical Discipline Construction Fund (grant no. SZXK039), Science and Technology Development Special Fund of Shenzhen Longgang District (grant nos. LGKCYLWS2019000864 and LGKCZSYS2019000046), Science and Technology Innovation Special-Technology Tackling Project of Shenzhen Longgang District (grant no. LGKCYLWS2022032).



Bousquet J, Anto JM, Bachert C, Baiardini I, Bosnic-Anticevich S, Walter Canonica G, Melén E, Palomares O, Scadding GK, Togias A and Toppila-Salmi S: Allergic rhinitis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 6:952020.


Zhang Y, Lan F and Zhang L: Update on pathomechanisms and treatments in allergic rhinitis. Allergy. 77:3309–3319. 2022.


Liu P, Kang C, Zhang J, Liu Y, Liu J, Hu T, Zeng X and Qiu S: The role of dendritic cells in allergic diseases. Int Immunopharmacol. 113:1094492022.


Hodge AL, Baxter AA and Poon IKH: Gift bags from the sentinel cells of the immune system: The diverse role of dendritic cell-derived extracellular vesicles. J Leukoc Biol. 111:903–920. 2022.


Zheng Z and Yu Y: A review of recent advances in exosomes and allergic rhinitis. Front Pharmacol. 13:10969842022.


Zhang Y, Bi J, Huang J, Tang Y, Du S and Li P: Exosome: A review of its classification, isolation techniques, storage, diagnostic and targeted therapy applications. Int J Nanomedicine. 15:6917–6934. 2020.


Elashiry M, Elsayed R, Elashiry MM, Rashid MH, Ara R, Arbab AS, Elawady AR, Hamrick M, Liu Y, Zhi W, et al: Proteomic characterization, biodistribution, and functional studies of immune-therapeutic exosomes: Implications for inflammatory lung diseases. Front Immunol. 12:6362222021.


Ibrahim A and Marbán E: Exosomes: Fundamental biology and roles in cardiovascular physiology. Annu Rev Physiol. 78:67–83. 2016.


Kalluri R and LeBleu VS: The biology, function, and biomedical applications of exosomes. Science. 367:eaau69772020.


Liu J, Ren L, Li S, Li W, Zheng X, Yang Y, Fu W, Yi J, Wang J and Du G: The biology, function, and applications of exosomes in cancer. Acta Pharm Sin B. 11:2783–2797. 2021.


Liu Q, Li S, Dupuy A, Mai HL, Sailliet N, Logé C, Robert JH and Brouard S: Exosomes as new biomarkers and drug delivery tools for the prevention and treatment of various diseases: Current perspectives. Int J Mol Sci. 22:77632021.


Pitt JM, André F, Amigorena S, Soria JC, Eggermont A, Kroemer G and Zitvogel L: Dendritic cell-derived exosomes for cancer therapy. J Clin Invest. 126:1224–1232. 2016.


Nikfarjam S, Rezaie J, Kashanchi F and Jafari R: Dexosomes as a cell-free vaccine for cancer immunotherapy. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 39:2582020.


Wu R, Gao W, Yao K and Ge J: Roles of exosomes derived from immune cells in cardiovascular diseases. Front Immunol. 10:6482019.


Elashiry M, Elsayed R and Cutler CW: Exogenous and endogenous dendritic cell-derived exosomes: Lessons learned for immunotherapy and disease pathogenesis. Cells. 11:1152021.


Viaud S, Terme M, Flament C, Taieb J, André F, Novault S, Escudier B, Robert C, Caillat-Zucman S, Tursz T, et al: Dendritic cell-derived exosomes promote natural killer cell activation and proliferation: A role for NKG2D ligands and IL-15Ralpha. PLoS One. 4:e49422009.


Wang X, He L, Huang X, Zhang S, Cao W, Che F, Zhu Y and Dai J: Recent progress of exosomes in multiple myeloma: Pathogenesis, diagnosis, prognosis and therapeutic strategies. Cancers (Basel). 13:16352021.


Vallhov H, Gutzeit C, Hultenby K, Valenta R, Grönlund H and Scheynius A: Dendritic cell-derived exosomes carry the major cat allergen Fel d 1 and induce an allergic immune response. Allergy. 70:1651–1655. 2015.


Nazimek K, Bryniarski K and Askenase PW: Functions of exosomes and microbial extracellular vesicles in allergy and contact and delayed-type hypersensitivity. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 171:1–26. 2016.


Collin M and Bigley V: Human dendritic cell subsets: An update. Immunology. 154:3–20. 2018.


Palucka K and Banchereau J: Cancer immunotherapy via dendritic cells. Nat Rev Cancer. 12:265–277. 2012.


Pearce EJ and Everts B: Dendritic cell metabolism. Nat Rev Immunol. 15:18–29. 2015.


Onai N and Manz MG: The STATs on dendritic cell development. Immunity. 28:490–492. 2008.


Macri C, Pang ES, Patton T and O'Keeffe M: Dendritic cell subsets. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 84:11–21. 2018.


Kumar S, Jeong Y, Ashraf MU and Bae YS: Dendritic cell-mediated Th2 immunity and immune disorders. Int J Mol Sci. 20:21592019.


Austyn JM: Dendritic cells in the immune system-history, lineages, tissues, tolerance, and immunity. Microbiol Spectr. 4:2016.


Manz MG: Plasmacytoid dendritic cells: Origin matters. Nat Immunol. 19:652–654. 2018.


Upham JW: The role of dendritic cells in immune regulation and allergic airway inflammation. Respirology. 8:140–148. 2003.


Merad M, Sathe P, Helft J, Miller J and Mortha A: The dendritic cell lineage: Ontogeny and function of dendritic cells and their subsets in the steady state and the inflamed setting. Annu Rev Immunol. 31:563–604. 2013.


Reizis B: Plasmacytoid dendritic cells: Development, regulation, and function. Immunity. 50:37–50. 2019.


Barrat FJ and Su L: A pathogenic role of plasmacytoid dendritic cells in autoimmunity and chronic viral infection. J Exp Med. 216:1974–1985. 2019.


Lamiable O, Mayer JU, Munoz-Erazo L and Ronchese F: Dendritic cells in Th2 immune responses and allergic sensitization. Immunol Cell Biol. 98:807–818. 2020.


Kool M, van Nimwegen M, Willart MAM, Muskens F, Boon L, Smit JJ, Coyle A, Clausen BE, Hoogsteden HC, Lambrecht BN and Hammad H: An anti-inflammatory role for plasmacytoid dendritic cells in allergic airway inflammation. J Immunol. 183:1074–1082. 2009.


Ghislat G and Lawrence T: Autophagy in dendritic cells. Cell Mol Immunol. 15:944–952. 2018.


Sabado RL, Balan S and Bhardwaj N: Dendritic cell-based immunotherapy. Cell Res. 27:74–95. 2017.


Gardner A, de Mingo Pulido Á and Ruffell B: Dendritic cells and their role in immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 11:9242020.


Koltsova EK and Ley K: How dendritic cells shape atherosclerosis. Trends Immunol. 32:540–547. 2011.


Zhu C, Li L, Wang Z, Irfan M and Qu F: Recent advances of aptasensors for exosomes detection. Biosens Bioelectron. 160:1122132020.


Zhang L and Yu D: Exosomes in cancer development, metastasis, and immunity. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 1871:455–468. 2019.


Liang Y, Duan L, Lu J and Xia J: Engineering exosomes for targeted drug delivery. Theranostics. 11:3183–3195. 2021.


Han QF, Li WJ, Hu KS, Gao J, Zhai WL, Yang JH and Zhang SJ: Exosome biogenesis: Machinery, regulation, and therapeutic implications in cancer. Mol Cancer. 21:2072022.


Hessvik NP and Llorente A: Current knowledge on exosome biogenesis and release. Cell Mol Life Sci. 75:193–208. 2018.


Shao H, Im H, Castro CM, Breakefield X, Weissleder R and Lee H: New technologies for analysis of extracellular vesicles. Chem Rev. 118:1917–1950. 2018.


Zhang Y, Liu Y, Liu H and Tang WH: Exosomes: Biogenesis, biologic function and clinical potential. Cell Biosci. 9:192019.


He C, Zheng S, Luo Y and Wang B: Exosome theranostics: Biology and translational medicine. Theranostics. 8:237–255. 2018.


Gurunathan S, Kang MH and Kim JH: A comprehensive review on factors influences biogenesis, functions, therapeutic and clinical implications of exosomes. Int J Nanomedicine. 16:1281–1312. 2021.


Li W, Li C, Zhou T, Liu X, Liu X, Li X and Chen D: Role of exosomal proteins in cancer diagnosis. Mol Cancer. 16:1452017.


Gurunathan S, Kang MH, Jeyaraj M, Qasim M and Kim JH: Review of the isolation, characterization, biological function, and multifarious therapeutic approaches of exosomes. Cells. 8:3072019.


Skotland T, Hessvik NP, Sandvig K and Llorente A: Exosomal lipid composition and the role of ether lipids and phosphoinositides in exosome biology. J Lipid Res. 60:9–18. 2019.


Skotland T, Sandvig K and Llorente A: Lipids in exosomes: Current knowledge and the way forward. Prog Lipid Res. 66:30–41. 2017.


Donoso-Quezada J, Ayala-Mar S and González-Valdez J: The role of lipids in exosome biology and intercellular communication: Function, analytics and applications. Traffic. 22:204–220. 2021.


Kugeratski FG, Hodge K, Lilla S, McAndrews KM, Zhou X, Hwang RF, Zanivan S and Kalluri R: Quantitative proteomics identifies the core proteome of exosomes with syntenin-1 as the highest abundant protein and a putative universal biomarker. Nat Cell Biol. 23:631–641. 2021.


Zhang H, Freitas D, Kim HS, Fabijanic K, Li Z, Chen H, Mark MT, Molina H, Martin AB, Bojmar L, et al: Identification of distinct nanoparticles and subsets of extracellular vesicles by asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation. Nat Cell Biol. 20:332–343. 2018.


Zhu L, Sun HT, Wang S, Huang SL, Zheng Y, Wang CQ, Hu BY, Qin W, Zou TT, Fu Y, et al: Isolation and characterization of exosomes for cancer research. J Hematol Oncol. 13:1522020.


Gebeyehu A, Kommineni N, Meckes DG Jr and Sachdeva MS: Role of exosomes for delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 38:53–97. 2021.


Yu W, Hurley J, Roberts D, Chakrabortty SK, Enderle D, Noerholm M, Breakefield XO and Skog JK: Exosome-based liquid biopsies in cancer: Opportunities and challenges. Ann Oncol. 32:466–477. 2021.


Meng W, Hao Y, He C, Li L and Zhu G: Exosome-orchestrated hypoxic tumor microenvironment. Mol Cancer. 18:572019.


Wang Y, Liu J, Ma J, Sun T, Zhou Q, Wang W, Wang G, Wu P, Wang H, Jiang L, et al: Exosomal circRNAs: Biogenesis, effect and application in human diseases. Mol Cancer. 18:1162019.


Sun Z, Yang S, Zhou Q, Wang G, Song J, Li Z, Zhang Z, Xu J, Xia K, Chang Y, et al: Emerging role of exosome-derived long non-coding RNAs in tumor microenvironment. Mol Cancer. 17:822018.


Huang S, Nishiumi S, Asaduzzaman M, Pan Y, Liu G, Yoshitake K, Maeyama K, Kinoshita S, Nagai K, Watabe S, et al: Exosome-derived small non-coding RNAs reveal immune response upon grafting transplantation in Pinctada fucata (Mollusca). Open Biol. 12:2103172022.


Marzec ME, Rząca C, Moskal P and Stępień E: Study of the influence of hyperglycemia on the abundance of amino acids, fatty acids, and selected lipids in extracellular vesicles using TOF-SIMS. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 622:30–36. 2022.


Onozato M, Kobata K, Sakamoto T, Ichiba H and Fukushima T: LC-MS/MS analysis of Thiol-containing amino acids in exosomal fraction of serum. J Chromatogr Sci. 58:636–640. 2020.


Zhu Q, Huang L, Yang Q, Ao Z, Yang R, Krzesniak J, Lou D, Hu L, Dai X, Guo F and Liu F: Metabolomic analysis of exosomal-markers in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Nanoscale. 13:16457–16464. 2021.


Zebrowska A, Skowronek A, Wojakowska A, Widlak P and Pietrowska M: Metabolome of exosomes: Focus on vesicles released by cancer cells and present in human body fluids. Int J Mol Sci. 20:34612019.


Williams C, Royo F, Aizpurua-Olaizola O, Pazos R, Boons GJ, Reichardt NC and Falcon-Perez JM: Glycosylation of extracellular vesicles: Current knowledge, tools and clinical perspectives. J Extracell Vesicles. 7:14429852018.


Gudbergsson JM and Johnsen KB: Exosomes and autophagy: Rekindling the vesicular waste hypothesis. J Cell Commun Signal. 13:443–450. 2019.


Gonzalez MJ, Kweh MF, Biava PM, Olalde J, Toro AP, Goldschmidt-Clermont PJ and White IA: Evaluation of exosome derivatives as bio-informational reprogramming therapy for cancer. J Transl Med. 19:1032021.


Kumar V, Kiran S, Kumar S and Singh UP: Extracellular vesicles in obesity and its associated inflammation. Int Rev Immunol. 41:30–44. 2022.


Mora EM, Álvarez-Cubela S and Oltra E: Biobanking of exosomes in the era of precision medicine: Are we there yet? Int J Mol Sci. 17:132015.


Krylova SV and Feng D: The machinery of exosomes: Biogenesis, release, and uptake. Int J Mol Sci. 24:13372023.


Li N, Zhao L, Wei Y, Ea VL, Nian H and Wei R: Recent advances of exosomes in immune-mediated eye diseases. Stem Cell Res Ther. 10:2782019.


Buzas EI: The roles of extracellular vesicles in the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 23:236–250. 2023.


Kim SB: Function and therapeutic development of exosomes for cancer therapy. Arch Pharm Res. 45:295–308. 2022.


Chen J, Li P, Zhang T, Xu Z, Huang X, Wang R and Du L: Review on strategies and technologies for exosome isolation and purification. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 9:8119712021.


Lai JJ, Chau ZL, Chen SY, Hill JJ, Korpany KV, Liang NW, Lin LH, Lin YH, Liu JK, Liu YC, et al: Exosome processing and characterization approaches for research and technology development. Adv Sci (Weinh). 9:e21032222022.


Chen Y, Zhu Q, Cheng L, Wang Y, Li M, Yang Q, Hu L, Lou D, Li J, Dong X, et al: Exosome detection via the ultrafast-isolation system: EXODUS. Nat Methods. 18:212–218. 2021.


Zhang X, Xu D, Song Y, He R and Wang T: Research progress in the application of exosomes in immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 13:7315162022.


Pathan M, Fonseka P, Chitti SV, Kang T, Sanwlani R, Van Deun J, Hendrix A and Mathivanan S: Vesiclepedia 2019: A compendium of RNA, proteins, lipids and metabolites in extracellular vesicles. Nucleic Acids Res. 47(D1): D516–D519. 2019.


Martínez-Greene JA, Hernández-Ortega K, Quiroz-Baez R, Resendis-Antonio O, Pichardo-Casas I, Sinclair DA, Budnik B, Hidalgo-Miranda A, Uribe-Querol E, Ramos-Godínez MDP, et al: Quantitative proteomic analysis of extracellular vesicle subgroups isolated by an optimized method combining polymer-based precipitation and size exclusion chromatography. J Extracell Vesicles. 10:e120872021.


Gandham S, Su X, Wood J, Nocera AL, Alli SC, Milane L, Zimmerman A, Amiji M and Ivanov AR: Technologies and standardization in research on extracellular vesicles. Trends Biotechnol. 38:1066–1098. 2020.


Lee K, Shao H, Weissleder R and Lee H: Acoustic purification of extracellular microvesicles. ACS Nano. 9:2321–2327. 2015.


Lin S, Yu Z, Chen D, Wang Z, Miao J, Li Q, Zhang D, Song J and Cui D: Progress in microfluidics-based exosome separation and detection technologies for diagnostic applications. Small. 16:e19039162020.


Yao Y, Fu C, Zhou L, Mi QS and Jiang A: DC-derived exosomes for cancer immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel). 13:36672021.


Viaud S, Théry C, Ploix S, Tursz T, Lapierre V, Lantz O, Zitvogel L and Chaput N: Dendritic cell-derived exosomes for cancer immunotherapy: What's next? Cancer Res. 70:1281–1285. 2010.


Xia J, Miao Y, Wang X, Huang X and Dai J: Recent progress of dendritic cell-derived exosomes (Dex) as an anti-cancer nanovaccine. Biomed Pharmacother. 152:1132502022.


Pelissier Vatter FA, Cioffi M, Hanna SJ, Castarede I, Caielli S, Pascual V, Matei I and Lyden D: Extracellular vesicle- and particle-mediated communication shapes innate and adaptive immune responses. J Exp Med. 218:e202025792021.


Pitt JM, Charrier M, Viaud S, André F, Besse B, Chaput N and Zitvogel L: Dendritic cell-derived exosomes as immunotherapies in the fight against cancer. J Immunol. 193:1006–1011. 2014.


Kowal J and Tkach M: Dendritic cell extracellular vesicles. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 349:213–249. 2019.


Robbins PD and Morelli AE: Regulation of immune responses by extracellular vesicles. Nat Rev Immunol. 14:195–208. 2014.


Zeng F and Morelli AE: Extracellular vesicle-mediated MHC cross-dressing in immune homeostasis, transplantation, infectious diseases, and cancer. Semin Immunopathol. 40:477–490. 2018.


Deb A, Gupta S and Mazumder PB: Exosomes: A new horizon in modern medicine. Life Sci. 264:1186232021.


Wu J, Zhao R, Dai J, Lai G, Khan AU, Yu X, Wu S, Ouyang J and Sang H: Analysis of differential expression of long non-coding RNAs in exosomes derived from mature and immature dendritic cells. Mol Med Rep. 23:1322021.


Du Z, Huang Z, Chen X, Jiang G, Peng Y, Feng W and Huang N: Modified dendritic cell-derived exosomes activate both NK cells and T cells through the NKG2D/NKG2D-L pathway to kill CML cells with or without T315I mutation. Exp Hematol Oncol. 11:362022.


Harvey BT, Fu X, Li L, Neupane KR, Anand N, Kolesar JM and Richards CI: Dendritic cell membrane-derived nanovesicles for targeted T cell activation. ACS Omega. 7:46222–46233. 2022.


Huang F, Jia H, Zou Y, Yao Y and Deng Z: Exosomes: An important messenger in the asthma inflammatory microenvironment. J Int Med Res. 48:3000605209032202020.


Wiklander OPB, Brennan MÁ, Lötvall J, Breakefield XO and El Andaloussi S: Advances in therapeutic applications of extracellular vesicles. Sci Transl Med. 11:eaav85212019.


Segura E, Amigorena S and Théry C: Mature dendritic cells secrete exosomes with strong ability to induce antigen-specific effector immune responses. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 35:89–93. 2005.


Delcayre A, Shu H and Le Pecq JB: Dendritic cell-derived exosomes in cancer immunotherapy: Exploiting nature's antigen delivery pathway. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 5:537–547. 2005.


Rao Q, Ma G, Li M, Wu H, Zhang Y, Zhang C, Ma Z and Huang L: Targeted delivery of triptolide by dendritic cell-derived exosomes for colitis and rheumatoid arthritis therapy in murine models. Br J Pharmacol. 180:330–346. 2023.


Zhang Y, Cai Z, Shen Y, Lu Q, Gao W, Zhong X, Yao K, Yuan J and Liu H: Hydrogel-load exosomes derived from dendritic cells improve cardiac function via Treg cells and the polarization of macrophages following myocardial infarction. J Nanobiotechnology. 19:2712021.


Engeroff P and Vogel M: The potential of exosomes in allergy immunotherapy. Vaccines (Basel). 10:1332022.


Sangaphunchai P, Todd I and Fairclough LC: Extracellular vesicles and asthma: A review of the literature. Clin Exp Allergy. 50:291–307. 2020.


Wang Y, Xiang Y, Xin VW, Wang XW, Peng XC, Liu XQ, Wang D, Li N, Cheng JT, Lyv YN, et al: Dendritic cell biology and its role in tumor immunotherapy. J Hematol Oncol. 13:1072020.


Metcalfe DD, Pawankar R, Ackerman SJ, Akin C, Clayton F, Falcone FH, Gleich GJ, Irani AM, Johansson MW, Klion AD, et al: Biomarkers of the involvement of mast cells, basophils and eosinophils in asthma and allergic diseases. World Allergy Organ J. 9:72016.


Sastre B, Cañas JA, Rodrigo-Muñoz JM and Del Pozo V: Novel modulators of asthma and allergy: Exosomes and MicroRNAs. Front Immunol. 8:8262017.


Srinivasan A and Sundar IK: Recent updates on the role of extracellular vesicles in the pathogenesis of allergic asthma. Extracell Vesicles Circ Nucl Acids. 2:127–147. 2021.


Kraft S, Jouvin MH, Kulkarni N, Kissing S, Morgan ES, Dvorak AM, Schröder B, Saftig P and Kinet JP: The tetraspanin CD63 is required for efficient IgE-mediated mast cell degranulation and anaphylaxis. J Immunol. 191:2871–2878. 2013.


Teng ZX, Zhou XC, Xu RT, Zhu FY, Bing X, Guo N, Shi L, Qi WW, Liu CC and Xia M: Tfh exosomes derived from allergic rhinitis promote DC maturation through miR-142-5p/CDK5/STAT3 pathway. J Inflamm Res. 15:3187–3205. 2022.


Wahlund CJE, Güclüler G, Hiltbrunner S, Veerman RE, Näslund TI and Gabrielsson S: Exosomes from antigen-pulsed dendritic cells induce stronger antigen-specific immune responses than microvesicles in vivo. Sci Rep. 7:170952017.


Mortaz E, Alipoor SD, Varahram M, Jamaati H, Garssen J, Mumby SE and Adcock IM: exosomes in severe asthma: Update in their roles and potential in therapy. Biomed Res Int. 2018:28621872018.


Liu Y, Sha J, Meng C and Zhu D: The role of small extracellular vesicles and MicroRNAs in the diagnosis and treatment of allergic rhinitis and nasal polyps. Mediators Inflamm. 2022:44286172022.


Hazrati A, Soudi S, Malekpour K, Mahmoudi M, Rahimi A, Hashemi SM and Varma RS: Immune cells-derived exosomes function as a double-edged sword: Role in disease progression and their therapeutic applications. Biomark Res. 10:302022.


Cañas JA, Sastre B, Rodrigo-Muñoz JM and Del Pozo V: Exosomes: A new approach to asthma pathology. Clin Chim Acta. 495:139–147. 2019.


Hovhannisyan L, Czechowska E and Gutowska-Owsiak D: The role of non-immune cell-derived extracellular vesicles in allergy. Front Immunol. 12:7023812021.


Hough KP, Wilson LS, Trevor JL, Strenkowski JG, Maina N, Kim YI, Spell ML, Wang Y, Chanda D, Dager JR, et al: Unique lipid signatures of extracellular vesicles from the airways of asthmatics. Sci Rep. 8:103402018.


Kim SH, Bianco NR, Shufesky WJ, Morelli AE and Robbins PD: Effective treatment of inflammatory disease models with exosomes derived from dendritic cells genetically modified to express IL-4. J Immunol. 179:2242–2249. 2007.


Yin W, Ouyang S, Li Y, Xiao B and Yang H: Immature dendritic cell-derived exosomes: A promise subcellular vaccine for autoimmunity. Inflammation. 36:232–240. 2013.


Lin J, Huang N, Li M, Zheng M, Wang Z, Zhang X, Gao H, Lao Y, Zhang J and Ding B: Dendritic cell-derived exosomes driven drug co-delivery biomimetic nanosystem for effective combination of malignant melanoma immunotherapy and gene therapy. Drug Des Devel Ther. 17:2087–2106. 2023.


Huda MN, Nafiujjaman M, Deaguero IG, Okonkwo J, Hill ML, Kim T and Nurunnabi M: Potential use of exosomes as diagnostic biomarkers and in targeted drug delivery: Progress in clinical and preclinical applications. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 7:2106–2149. 2021.


Esser J, Gehrmann U, D'Alexandri FL, Hidalgo-Estévez AM, Wheelock CE, Scheynius A, Gabrielsson S and Rådmark O: Exosomes from human macrophages and dendritic cells contain enzymes for leukotriene biosynthesis and promote granulocyte migration. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 126:1032–1040. 1040.e1–e4. 2010.


Choi HW, Suwanpradid J, Kim IH, Staats HF, Haniffa M, MacLeod AS and Abraham SN: Perivascular dendritic cells elicit anaphylaxis by relaying allergens to mast cells via microvesicles. Science. 362:eaao06662018.


Li Q, Wang H, Peng H, Huyan T and Cacalano NA: Exosomes: Versatile nano mediators of immune regulation. Cancers (Basel). 11:15572019.


Huang L, Zhang X, Wang M, Chen Z, Yan Y, Gu W, Tan J, Jiang W and Ji W: Exosomes from thymic stromal lymphopoietin-activated dendritic cells promote Th2 differentiation through the OX40 ligand. Pathobiology. 86:111–117. 2019.


Zhu H, Wang K, Wang Z, Wang D, Yin X, Liu Y, Yu F and Zhao W: An efficient and safe MUC1-dendritic cell-derived exosome conjugate vaccine elicits potent cellular and humoral immunity and tumor inhibition in vivo. Acta Biomater. 138:491–504. 2022.


Johnsen KB, Gudbergsson JM, Skov MN, Pilgaard L, Moos T and Duroux M: A comprehensive overview of exosomes as drug delivery vehicles-endogenous nanocarriers for targeted cancer therapy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1846:75–87. 2014.


Bianco NR, Kim SH, Morelli AE and Robbins PD: Modulation of the immune response using dendritic cell-derived exosomes. Methods Mol Biol. 380:443–455. 2007.


Schülke S: Induction of interleukin-10 producing dendritic cells as a tool to suppress allergen-specific T helper 2 responses. Front Immunol. 9:4552018.


Bianco NR, Kim SH, Ruffner MA and Robbins PD: Therapeutic effect of exosomes from indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-positive dendritic cells in collagen-induced arthritis and delayed-type hypersensitivity disease models. Arthritis Rheum. 60:380–389. 2009.


Jia Z, Liu J, Li B, Yi L, Wu Y, Xing J, Wang L, Wang J and Guo L: Exosomes with FOXP3 from gene-modified dendritic cells ameliorate the development of EAE by regulating the balance of Th/Treg. Int J Med Sci. 19:1265–1274. 2022.


Yu D, Liu JQ, Mo LH, Luo XQ, Liu ZQ, Wu GH, Yang LT, Liu DB, Wang S, Liu ZG and Yang PC: Specific antigen-guiding exosomes inhibit food allergies by inducing regulatory T cells. Immunol Cell Biol. 98:639–649. 2020.


Kim SH, Bianco N, Menon R, Lechman ER, Shufesky WJ, Morelli AE and Robbins PD: Exosomes derived from genetically modified DC expressing FasL are anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive. Mol Ther. 13:289–300. 2006.


Näslund TI, Gehrmann U, Qazi KR, Karlsson MC and Gabrielsson S: Dendritic cell-derived exosomes need to activate both T and B cells to induce antitumor immunity. J Immunol. 190:2712–2719. 2013.


Iberg CA and Hawiger D: Natural and induced tolerogenic dendritic cells. J Immunol. 204:733–744. 2020.

Related Articles

Journal Cover

Volume 52 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 1107-3756
Online ISSN:1791-244X

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
Spandidos Publications style
Kang C, He H, Liu P, Liu Y, Li X, Zhang J, Ran H, Zeng X, Zhao H, Liu J, Liu J, et al: Role of dendritic cell‑derived exosomes in allergic rhinitis (Review). Int J Mol Med 52: 117, 2023
Kang, C., He, H., Liu, P., Liu, Y., Li, X., Zhang, J. ... Qiu, S. (2023). Role of dendritic cell‑derived exosomes in allergic rhinitis (Review). International Journal of Molecular Medicine, 52, 117.
Kang, C., He, H., Liu, P., Liu, Y., Li, X., Zhang, J., Ran, H., Zeng, X., Zhao, H., Liu, J., Qiu, S."Role of dendritic cell‑derived exosomes in allergic rhinitis (Review)". International Journal of Molecular Medicine 52.6 (2023): 117.
Kang, C., He, H., Liu, P., Liu, Y., Li, X., Zhang, J., Ran, H., Zeng, X., Zhao, H., Liu, J., Qiu, S."Role of dendritic cell‑derived exosomes in allergic rhinitis (Review)". International Journal of Molecular Medicine 52, no. 6 (2023): 117.