Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Oncology Letters
      • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • Information for Authors
    • Information for Reviewers
    • Information for Librarians
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Reviewers
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Login Register Submit
  • This site uses cookies
  • You can change your cookie settings at any time by following the instructions in our Cookie Policy. To find out more, you may read our Privacy Policy.

    I agree
Search articles by DOI, keyword, author or affiliation
Search
Advanced Search
presentation
International Journal of Molecular Medicine
Join Editorial Board Propose a Special Issue
Print ISSN: 1107-3756 Online ISSN: 1791-244X
Journal Cover
May-2026 Volume 57 Issue 5

Full Size Image

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

Journals

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.

Molecular Medicine Reports

Molecular Medicine Reports

Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.

Biomedical Reports

Biomedical Reports

Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.

World Academy of Sciences Journal

World Academy of Sciences Journal

Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.

International Journal of Epigenetics

International Journal of Epigenetics

Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.

Medicine International

Medicine International

An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.

Journal Cover
May-2026 Volume 57 Issue 5

Full Size Image

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

  • Article
  • Citations
    • Cite This Article
    • Download Citation
    • Create Citation Alert
    • Remove Citation Alert
    • Cited By
  • Similar Articles
    • Related Articles (in Spandidos Publications)
    • Similar Articles (Google Scholar)
    • Similar Articles (PubMed)
  • Download PDF
  • Download XML
  • View XML
Review Open Access

Mechanism of action and clinical application of autophagy in multiple sclerosis (Review)

  • Authors:
    • Dongmei Wang
    • Qizhi Fu
    • Ying Zhao
    • Guangda Li
    • Yongjie Bai
    • Yang Yang
    • Hongna Song
    • Mingwei Wang
    • Hua Fan
  • View Affiliations / Copyright

    Affiliations: College of Basic Medicine and Forensic Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, Henan 471000, P.R. China, Office of Research & Innovation, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, Henan 471000, P.R. China, School of Medical Technology and Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, Henan 471000, P.R. China, Department of Neurology, Zhengzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450007, P.R. China, Department of Neuro‑auricular Vertigo, The Second Hospital Affiliated to Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, Henan 471000, P.R. China, Department of Cardiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311321, P.R. China
    Copyright: © Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
  • Article Number: 129
    |
    Published online on: March 17, 2026
       https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2026.5800
  • Expand metrics +
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

This article is mentioned in:


Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a progressive, long‑term disorder affecting the central nervous system. The management and treatment of MS require significant medical resources, placing a heavy burden on both individuals and society. Autophagy is essential for the degradation of dysfunctional or excess cellular components. In the context of MS, autophagy exhibits dual roles, both protective and detrimental. On one hand, it mitigates disease progression by reducing oxidative stress and inflammation. On the other hand, autophagy activates various immune and supportive cells pivotal in MS pathogenesis. This review aims to explore the relationship between autophagy and MS, its impact on disease progression and the current challenges in this field.

Introduction

Multiple sclerosis (MS)

MS is a complex neurological disorder. Extensive research on its global epidemiology and societal impact has highlighted its significant effects on both individuals and communities. Data from 2015 ranked MS as the 10th most common neurological condition, with an estimated 2.01 million cases at that time (1). According to updated data, an estimated 2.9 million individuals are living with MS globally, with the prevalence having increased in most countries reporting updated data (2). This data represents a significant increase compared to earlier estimates, and the rising prevalence of the disease underscores the importance of ongoing research efforts. However, MS incidence varies considerably by region. Countries with higher socioeconomic status often report a greater frequency of MS, possibly influenced by environmental factors, genetic predispositions and lifestyle choices. For instance, MS is more prevalent in regions like North America and Northern Europe, while it is less common in parts of Asia and Africa. MS typically manifests in young adults, particularly affecting women aged 20 to 40 years, with women being affected at roughly three times the rate of men (3). This gender disparity may be attributed to hormonal, immune and genetic factors.

The management and treatment of MS require significant medical resources, placing a heavy burden on both individuals and society (4). Because MS requires long-term multidisciplinary management, including medication, rehabilitation and psychological support, patients often face substantially higher healthcare costs than individuals without the condition (5). Furthermore, MS often leads to reduced work capacity, contributing to higher unemployment and absenteeism rates. Studies show that individuals with MS experience diminished work abilities throughout their careers, affecting both their financial independence and quality of life (6). Mental health challenges, such as anxiety and depression, are also common among those with MS, further deteriorating their overall health and amplifying the demand for healthcare services (7).

Inadequate social support networks can exacerbate these issues (8). Additionally, societal attitudes and understanding of MS vary widely across cultures and communities (9). Numerous patients face social stigma and misunderstanding, which negatively affects their psychological well-being and social interactions. Therefore, raising public awareness of MS is essential to improving social integration and support for affected individuals (10). Global epidemiological data highlight the rising prevalence of MS as a significant public health concern, with profound implications for both individuals and society (11). Given its rising incidence and impact, advancing research and public health initiatives is crucial to improving the lives of those affected and alleviating the strain on society (12).

Definition and classification of autophagy

Adapter proteins are crucial in selective autophagy, identifying distinct autophagic substrates and attaching them to autophagosomes. Through this method, cells can effectively mark and separate substances requiring degradation (13). This mechanism plays a crucial role in maintaining autophagy selectivity, guaranteeing the breakdown of only certain substances without impacting other cell parts.

Multistep process

Selective autophagy involves initially identifying and isolating the autophagic substrate, then creating the autophagosome, merging it with the lysosome and finally breaking it down. The procedure entails controlling various intracellular signaling routes to guarantee autophagy's efficiency and specificity (14).

Selective autophagy varieties

Depending on the specific substrate and its role, there are multiple subtypes of selective autophagy, including mitochondrial autophagy (mitophagy), which specifically focuses on impaired or dysfunctional mitochondria. Through mitochondrial autophagy, cells are able to eliminate impaired mitochondria, thereby averting oxidative stress and cellular demise. Plasmalemmal autophagy is a type of autophagy that targets certain areas of the cell membrane, eliminating detrimental elements or pathogens to preserve the cell's integrity and functionality (15). Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) autophagy concentrates on eliminating irregular or improperly folded proteins in the ER to preserve its functionality and health (16).

The biological roles of autophagy

Autophagy plays a crucial role in MS pathogenesis by regulating the balance of cellular stress and inflammation (17). In MS, autophagy is particularly involved in controlling oxidative stress and mitigating damage to oligodendrocytes, which are critical for myelin regeneration (18). Three recent studies consistently emphasize that autophagy is not intrinsically beneficial or harmful, but a context-dependent regulatory process whose impact in diseases such as MS depends on cell type, timing and magnitude of activation (19-21). According to the conceptual framework proposed by the three recently studies, autophagy is a highly dynamic and tightly regulated cellular process rather than a uniformly protective pathway. Their critical evaluation of autophagy in MS explicitly challenges the notion of autophagy as an inherently beneficial process, emphasizing that its effects vary across immune and central nervous system (CNS) cell types, disease stages and inflammatory environments. Autophagy is also essential for maintaining cellular quality (22). It selectively eliminates dysfunctional organelles, such as damaged mitochondria, and removes harmful proteins, preventing the accumulation of toxic substances within the cell (23). This process plays a key role in protecting cells from stress and damage. As an adaptive mechanism, autophagy helps cells adjust to environmental changes, particularly during starvation or stress (24). By breaking down internal cellular components, autophagy provides essential nutrients, ensuring ongoing cell survival and functionality. Additionally, autophagy is integral to immune responses (25). It is involved in both anti-infective and immune reactions by eliminating intracellular pathogens and promoting the activation and growth of immune cells through antigen processing (26). As a result, modulating autophagy may offer a novel therapeutic strategy for treating MS (27). In summary, autophagy serves multiple biological roles, from energy distribution and cell quality control to adaptive responses and immune function. Understanding the mechanisms underlying autophagy and its impact on diseases can inspire innovative approaches for studying and treating conditions like MS. Regulating autophagy holds promise for improving disease outcomes, enhancing neuroprotection and slowing disease progression. Seminal work by Mizushima et al (28-30) has established autophagy as a fundamental cellular process essential for maintaining intracellular and tissue homeostasis. Through a series of influential studies and comprehensive reviews, autophagy has been conceptualized not merely as a degradation pathway but as a dynamic system governing cellular quality control, metabolic adaptation and tissue renovation. Extending from the cellular to the tissue level, autophagy has been described as a 'renovation' mechanism that supports long-term tissue maintenance and functional stability, particularly in organs with limited regenerative capacity such as the CNS. This conceptual framework provides a critical foundation for understanding how autophagy may exert both protective and detrimental effects in CNS immune-mediated disorders, including MS, depending on cell type, disease stage and microenvironmental cues.

Control systems governing autophagy
Pathway of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)

The mTOR is a central nutrient- and energy-sensing kinase that plays a major, but context-dependent, role in autophagy regulation (31). Rather than acting as a simple inhibitory switch, mTOR integrates multiple environmental cues to dynamically modulate autophagy. In particular, mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) suppresses autophagy under nutrient-rich conditions by phosphorylating components of the unc-51-like autophagy-activated kinase 1 (ULK1) initiation complex, thereby preventing autophagosome formation (32,33). Growth factor signaling, such as insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding to IGF1 receptor (IGF1R), activates the PI3K-Akt pathway, leading to inhibition of the tuberous sclerosis 1 (TSC1)/TSC2 complex and subsequent activation of mTORC1, which suppresses autophagy (34-36). Conversely, amino acid deprivation and energy stress suppress mTORC1 activity, enabling autophagy initiation. mTORC1 activity is also regulated spatially through its association with lysosomal membranes, highlighting the importance of subcellular localization in autophagy control (37,38).

Pathway of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK)

AMPK functions as a key metabolic sensor that regulates autophagy in response to cellular energy stress (39). Upon glucose deprivation, AMPK activation can promote autophagy by directly phosphorylating ULK1. However, this effect is modulated by mTORC1 activity, as mTORC1-dependent phosphorylation of ULK1 may counteract AMPK-mediated activation (40). In addition, AMPK indirectly influences autophagy through the TSC1/2-mTOR axis, highlighting its role as an upstream regulator within a broader signaling network rather than a unidirectional activator (41).

Pathway of protein kinase A (PKA)

PKA senses glucose availability and has been reported to negatively regulate autophagy under nutrient-rich conditions, primarily through phosphorylation of autophagy-related proteins such as autophagy-related protein 1 (Atg1) and Atg13 (42). Furthermore, PKA may indirectly suppress autophagy by modulating mTORC1 and AMPK signaling, suggesting an indirect and context-dependent regulatory role (43).

Pathway of Jnk-1

The JNK-1 pathway has been implicated in autophagy induction, particularly under stress conditions such as nutrient deprivation and ER stress (44). Activation of JNK-1 can lead to phosphorylation of Bcl-2, thereby disrupting its interaction with Beclin 1 (BECN1) and facilitating autophagy initiation (45). However, JNK-mediated autophagy is highly dependent on stress intensity, duration and cell type, underscoring its role as a stress-responsive modulator rather than a universal autophagy activator.

Pathway of P53

Nuclear p53 can transcriptionally activate autophagy-related genes through the TSC1-mTOR pathway, whereas cytoplasmic p53 has been shown to suppress basal autophagy. Consequently, pharmacological inhibition of p53 may induce autophagy in certain cellular contexts but suppress it in others, highlighting the complexity of p53-mediated autophagy regulation (40).

Free fatty acids

Lipid metabolism is closely connected to autophagy regulation (46). Free fatty acids can activate EIF2S1/eIF2α and MAPK8 through the EIF2AK2/PKR-dependent pathway or inhibit mTORC1, thereby promoting autophagy (47). Lipid droplets, which are dietary fats stored in cells, trigger autophagy, forming autophagosomes that envelop and transport them to lysosomes for degradation. Degradation products, such as free fatty acids, regulate autophagy and prevent lipotoxicity (25).

Pathway of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3)

Inositol monophosphatase (IMPase) reduces the levels of unbound inositol and IP3, which in turn promotes calcium ion release from the ER. This process occurs via the binding of IP3 to its receptors on the reticulum's surface, activating a cascade of calcium-dependent proteases and inhibiting autophagy by cleaving and activating stimulatory alpha subunit of heterotrimeric G proteins (Gsα), resulting in significant cyclic (c)AMP production (48). Additional mechanisms may contribute to this pathway, such as the reduction in IP3 levels, which limits calcium entry from the ER into mitochondria, potentially impairing the mitochondrial respiratory chain and subsequently enhancing autophagy via the AMPK pathway. Furthermore, the IP3 receptor interacts with BECN1, suppressing autophagy (16). Neuropsychotropic drugs such as sodium valproate and carbamazepine are known to stimulate autophagy through this pathway (49).

Molecular impacts of autophagy

The primary mechanism driving autophagy involves the activity of ATG proteins. This process is further regulated by AMPK and mTOR, which modulate autophagy through the phosphorylation of key proteins like ULK1, ULK2 and ATG13. Phosphorylated ULK1 activates BECN1, a homolog of yeast Vps30/Atg6, initiating the formation of autophagosomes through the ULK1-BECN1 complex. As part of the class III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PtdIns3K) complex, BECN1 generates PtdIns3P on the membranes of phagocytic vesicles, serving as a binding site for additional autophagy-related proteins. A pair of ubiquitin-like conjugation systems, comprising ATG12-ATG5-ATG16L1 and the Atg8 family proteins such as microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (MAP1LC3, commonly referred to as LC3) and γ-aminobutyric acid receptor-associated protein, are essential for the growth and expansion of phagocytic vesicles and the attachment of specific autophagic types (16,48,50) (Fig. 1).

Major signaling pathways regulating
autophagy. Autophagy is regulated by multiple signaling pathways,
including mTOR, AMPK, PKA, JNK-1, p53, free fatty acid-related
pathways and IP3 signaling. The mTOR pathway functions as a central
negative regulator of autophagy in response to nutrient
availability, whereas AMPK activates autophagy under energy stress.
PKA generally suppresses autophagy under high-glucose conditions.
JNK-1 promotes autophagy by modulating the Beclin 1-Bcl-2
interaction during nutrient deprivation. p53 can either induce or
inhibit autophagy depending on its cellular localization and
regulatory context. Free fatty acids and lipid droplets modulate
autophagy through metabolic stress-related signaling, while IP3
signaling inhibits autophagy via calcium-dependent mechanisms and
BECN1binding. IP3, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate; mTOR, mammalian
target of rapamycin; AMPK, adenosine monophosphate-activated
protein kinase; PKA, protein kinase A; ULK1, unc-51-like
autophagy-activated kinase 1; Atg12, autophagy-related protein 12;
BECN1, Beclin 1.

Figure 1

Major signaling pathways regulating autophagy. Autophagy is regulated by multiple signaling pathways, including mTOR, AMPK, PKA, JNK-1, p53, free fatty acid-related pathways and IP3 signaling. The mTOR pathway functions as a central negative regulator of autophagy in response to nutrient availability, whereas AMPK activates autophagy under energy stress. PKA generally suppresses autophagy under high-glucose conditions. JNK-1 promotes autophagy by modulating the Beclin 1-Bcl-2 interaction during nutrient deprivation. p53 can either induce or inhibit autophagy depending on its cellular localization and regulatory context. Free fatty acids and lipid droplets modulate autophagy through metabolic stress-related signaling, while IP3 signaling inhibits autophagy via calcium-dependent mechanisms and BECN1binding. IP3, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; AMPK, adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase; PKA, protein kinase A; ULK1, unc-51-like autophagy-activated kinase 1; Atg12, autophagy-related protein 12; BECN1, Beclin 1.

Collectively, these pathways illustrate that autophagy is governed by an intricate and highly interconnected regulatory network rather than by linear signaling cascades. The functional outcome of autophagy signaling depends on nutrient availability, cellular context, stress intensity and disease state.

This review was based on a comprehensive literature search of peer-reviewed articles related to autophagy and MS. The primary databases searched included PubMed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), Web of Science (https://www.webofscience.com/) and Scopus (https://www.scopus.com/). Relevant studies were identified using combinations of key words such as 'multiple sclerosis', 'autophagy', 'mitophagy', 'oxidative stress', 'immune regulation' and 'neurodegeneration'. Articles were selected based on their relevance to the role of autophagy in MS pathogenesis, progression and potential therapeutic implications. Priority was given to original research articles, high-quality reviews and recent studies that provided mechanistic insights or experimental evidence. Studies focusing on non-MS neurodegenerative diseases were included when they offered conceptual or mechanistic relevance to MS. Non-English publications and studies lacking sufficient experimental or clinical relevance were excluded.

Connection between autophagy and neurological conditions

Neuronal structures are highly susceptible to disruptions due to the interaction between endosomes/autophagosomes and lysosomes, particularly in the aging brain. Genetic aging and alterations in autophagic processes are linked to the onset of various neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), familial Parkinson's disease (PD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), which arise from impaired lysosomal clearance. Autophagic dysfunction is associated with the accumulation of cytoplasmic aggregates, protein buildup in neurons and mitochondrial dysfunction. These diseases share similarities with MS, characterized by suppressed autophagy. Dysfunction in autophagy leads to cellular dysfunction, further promoting the progression of these diseases. Unlike other cell types, neurons cannot eliminate damaged organelles or misfolded proteins through cell division. The presence of synapses, dendrites and axons, along with their significant distance from the cytosol, further complicates autophagy and intercellular communication (28,37,51,52).

PD

PD, a neurodegenerative disorder, results from the selective degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra. Neuropathologically, PD is characterized by the deposition of Lewy bodies, which consist of cellular accumulations of ubiquitin and α-synuclein (SNCA). Autophagy plays a critical role in preventing PD onset by degrading SNCA through both macroautophagy and chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA). Inhibition of these processes leads to the accumulation of both mutant and normal forms of SNCA (53). BECN1 promotes autophagy, thereby enhancing SNCA degradation. The role of BECN1 in promoting autophagy is equally important in MS. The accumulation of SNCA disrupts macroautophagy, as high SNCA levels lead to irregular distribution of ATG9, inhibiting omegasome formation, a precursor to autophagic vesicles, and suppressing CMA, which contributes to progressive neuronal damage (40). The autophagy process in neurons is more complex than in other cell types, further complicating its role in neurodegenerative diseases.

Of note, autophagy may paradoxically contribute to neuronal degeneration under certain conditions. Overactivation of autophagy can exacerbate dopaminergic neuron death, with heightened autophagic activity in PD potentially triggered by oxidative stress that suppresses genes involved in mTOR activation. Supporting this view, autophagy stimulants have been shown to worsen neuronal death in the context of oxidative stress, suggesting that autophagy may act as a double-edged sword in PD (54). Additionally, parkin RBR E3 ubiquitin ligase (PRKN) plays a key role in mitochondrial autophagy by removing damaged mitochondria. Defective PRKN in PD leads to mitochondrial dysfunction and neurodegeneration. Of note, mitochondrial autophagy is dysfunctional in MS, not merely suppressed (55).

A comparative analysis between 20 patients with PD and 20 individuals with idiopathic tremor revealed significantly lower plasma concentrations of the lysosomal hydrolase CTSD (histone D) and BAG chaperone 2, a regulator of the PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1)-PRKN pathway, in those with PD. These findings suggest a reduction in autophagic activity in PD. Similarly, peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with PD showed diminished levels of heat shock protein family A member 8/heat shock cognate protein of 71 kDa, a critical component of CMA (56). As a result, autophagy is notably impaired in PD, though it can be either suppressed or upregulated under different circumstances.

Conversely, inhibiting mTOR may offer therapeutic potential in AD by promoting autophagy (57). In AD, autophagy, a vital process for microglia to clear amyloid-β (Aβ), becomes dysfunctional. Experimental studies have shown that microglia in AD mice exhibit elevated levels of microRNAs (miRNAs), which suppress the expression of autophagy-related proteins. Of note, Aβ accumulation around microglia precedes autophagy impairment in AD (58). Extended exposure to Aβ also triggers miRNA expression in peripheral neurons (59).

Impaired autophagic processes, particularly the dysfunctional formation and transport of autophagosomes, lead to the progressive accumulation of autophagic vesicles around neurons in AD. This accumulation, exacerbated by Aβ, promotes neurodegeneration (60). In addition, a reduction in BECN1 levels, both in AD and aging, results in diminished autophagic activity. This decrease in BECN1 triggers neurodegeneration through enhanced Aβ accumulation and disruptions in autophagy and APP metabolism (17). These findings suggest that excessive autophagy may contribute to the neuropathology of AD, although autophagy malfunctions could also be secondary to disease progression.

Furthermore, the autophagy and BECN1regulatory factor 1 (AMBRA1) protein, which regulates autophagy in the CNS, interacts with BECN1 to strengthen its association with the lipid kinase phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase catalytic subunit type 3 (PIK3C3/VPS34). Together with PIK3C3/VPS34 and BECN1, AMBRA1 is considered a key component of the autophagy core complex, which is critical for regulating this process in AD. The autophagy core complex itself plays an essential role in modulating autophagic activity (61).

Sclerosis of the amyotrophic lateral system

ALS, a progressive neurodegenerative disorder, is characterized by the gradual degeneration of motor neurons. Of the two ALS subtypes, 90% of cases are sporadic, while the familial form accounts for the remaining 10% (62). Autophagy plays a critical role in ALS pathogenesis. Excessive macroautophagy accelerates spinal motor neuron degeneration in ALS mice with the mutant superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1), which is implicated in ~20% of familial ALS cases (63). Notably, the motor neuron degeneration observed in these mice is closely linked to autophagic dysfunction and autophagosome formation (64). Chen et al (65) highlighted the association between impaired autophagic regulation and ALS-associated proteins, such as mutant SOD1, along with other gene products that contribute to abnormal autophagic activity.

Furthermore, optic nerve phosphatase (OPTN), a highly conserved protein, is essential for regulating various cellular processes, including vesicular transport, inflammation and autophagy (66). Genetic alterations in OPTN are linked to inflammation and glaucoma in patients with ALS, while the loss of OPTN is associated with cerebral atrophy (67).

In summary, the various stages of autophagy influence a range of neurodegenerative disorders in distinct ways. For instance, in AD and ALS, there is an increase in autophagy initiation, while the fusion and maturation stages are disrupted in both conditions. In PD, the nucleation phase is notably diminished. These stage-specific autophagic dysfunctions may be linked to the unique pathophysiology of each neurodegenerative disease.

Investigating autophagy's function in MS

Autophagy plays a dual role in the pathogenesis of MS, similar to its involvement in other diseases. Recent studies have highlighted that autophagy-dependent ferroptosis contributes to the onset of MS (68). Microglia-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) carry bioactive cargo that modulates neuroinflammation and glia-neuronal interactions in MS, and dysregulation of microglial autophagy has been linked to impaired myelin-debris handling and poorer recovery in demyelinating models. MS-focused studies indicate that altered microglial EV signaling and autophagic dysfunction may contribute to neurodegeneration and disease progression in specific pathological contexts (69).

The link between autophagy and MS was first established in animal models, where altered autophagy markers were observed in hippocampal neurons. One study identified significant increases in the expression of Beclin-1, LC3 and p62, alongside disturbances in the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway, upon examining key autophagy proteins. When compared to control groups, mice with MS exhibited notably reduced Beclin-1/LC3II and p62 levels. Molecular studies further revealed abnormalities in Akt/mTOR pathways, indicating that autophagy activation occurs in hippocampal neurons within this experimental model (70). Additionally, autophagy and mitochondrial autophagy-related markers were found to be upregulated in the bodily fluids of patients with MS (71).

These findings suggest a robust association between autophagy and MS pathology. Of note, ALS-associated proteins, including transactive response DNA-binding protein of 43 kDa and SOD1, have also been implicated in autophagic dysregulation. Several genetic mutations in ALS interfere with autophagy in motor neurons, reinforcing the notion that autophagy dysregulation plays a central role in ALS pathogenesis (72). Furthermore, ATG16L2, an autophagy-related gene, has been proposed as a potential serum biomarker for MS, identified using microbead-based proteomics technology (73).

In addition, bioinformatics combined with machine learning approaches has been used to explore the role of autophagy-related genes in MS. The 9 autophagy genes most strongly associated with MS were identified, with bioinformatics and experimental data indicating their significant involvement in autophagy regulation and MS development (74). The 9 autophagy genes with the strongest correlations were as follows: Becn1, fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (Fgfr2), integrin alpha 3 (Itga3), Napsin A aspartic peptidase (Napsa), neurotrophic tyrosine kinase, receptor, type 2 (Ntrk2), ataxia telangiectasia mutated (Atm), solute carrier family 36 member 4 (Slc36a4), member RAS oncogene family (Rab10) and Rous sarcoma oncogene (Src). BECN1 BECN1is one of the core genes involved in autophagy; in MS, reduced expression of BECN1is associated with impaired myelin regeneration. Changes in Fgfr2 expression levels in patients with MS may be associated with neuroinflammation and myelin damage. In MS, Itga3 expression is upregulated, potentially affecting immune cell migration and nerve damage. Napsa may influence immune responses within the nervous system in MS. Reduced expression of Ntrk2 correlates with neurodegeneration and impaired myelin repair. Atm gene defects are associated with enhanced neuroinflammation and immune responses. Slc36a4 may influence neuroinflammation by regulating immune responses. Downregulation of Rab10 may affect autophagosome maturation and the process of neural repair. Upregulation of Src expression may exacerbate immune responses and neuroinflammation in MS. Gene expression profiles of autophagy-related genes in MS also reflected similar patterns, further emphasizing the connection between autophagy and MS (75). These findings collectively highlight the complex relationship between autophagy and MS. The varying stages of autophagy and the progression of MS warrant further investigation to understand how these processes are interlinked and how they can be leveraged for potential therapeutic strategies.

The process of autophagy fosters the progression of MS

Numerous studies have emphasized the protective role of autophagy in preventing the onset and progression of MS (76). Autophagy helps mitigate the development of MS by neutralizing reactive oxygen species (ROS) (77). Compared to healthy individuals, patients with MS show elevated levels of oxidized phospholipids, DNA and oxidative stress markers (78). A reduction in autophagic activity correlates with increased oxidative stress and inflammation due to impaired ROS clearance, leading to higher IL1B/IL-1β production (79). Research has extensively explored the interplay between hypoxia-inducible factor 1, ROS and autophagy in MS (80). The mechanisms through which ER stress and autophagy contribute to MS pathogenesis are well documented.

Similarly, fenofibrate, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPAR-α) agonist, has been shown to reduce inflammation in MS by modulating autophagy and inhibiting helper T cell 17 (Th17) cell differentiation, along with decreasing pro-inflammatory signals (81). Studies also indicate that miRNA-223 (miR-223) impedes autophagy and exacerbates inflammation in MS by targeting ATG16L1 (82). Furthermore, blocking autophagy has been found to trigger NOD-, LRR-, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome activation in microglia via phosphodiesterase 10A-cyclic AMP signaling, which leads to increased IL1B/IL-1β levels and enhanced macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) production. Inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasomes with the MCC950 inhibitor reduced MIF expression, alleviated neuroinflammation and reversed neuronal damage in the substantia nigra (83).

In addition to ROS, reactive nitrogen species (RNS), such as nitric oxide and peroxynitrite, are involved in neurodegeneration in MS (84). These molecules can nitrate or nitrosylate the dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1)/Parkin/PINK1 pathway, promoting excessive mitochondrial autophagy and amplifying neuronal damage. Targeting the RNS-driven excessive autophagy/mitochondrial autophagy pathway holds potential for developing novel anti-MS therapies (85).

Notably, the mTOR pathway, which regulates autophagy, also influences microglial-driven inflammation in MS (86). Targeting specific inhibitors within the PI3K-mTOR signaling axis could offer a promising therapeutic strategy for MS treatment.

Extensive research also supports the inhibitory role of autophagy in MS, potentially through prolonged activation of mTORC1, which may depend on the progression of the lesions. The present findings deepen the understanding of autophagy's role in various stages of MS pathology, suggesting that the mTORC1 pathway could serve as a key regulator, influencing CNS homeostasis and neuroinflammation in MS (87). In this context, rapamycin, an mTOR inhibitor, may stimulate autophagy and promote myelin regeneration by reducing inflammation. Additionally, curcumin has been shown to affect MS metabolism by interacting with AMPK, PPARG coactivator 1 α/PPARγ and the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathways (88). Several reviews have discussed the mechanisms through which the mTOR complex pathway influences MS (89).

Furthermore, the increase in autophagy during MS could represent an adaptive response to the heightened unfolded protein response (UPR) triggered by ER stress. The UPR serves a cytoprotective function by regulating ER activity, supporting oligodendrocyte function and enhancing myelin production in MS. Thus, stimulating the UPR may reduce MS neuropathology by promoting autophagy.

Echoing previous research, numerous studies emphasize the importance of protein homeostasis in disease development. Impairment of the autophagy-lysosomal pathway, coupled with the detrimental effects of C9orf72 repeat RNA and dipeptide repeat proteins, contributes to disease progression (90). Additionally, optineurin has been shown to initiate autophagy by clearing protein aggregates via a ubiquitin-independent mechanism, thus facilitating the progression of MS (91).

During the active phase of MS, significant increases in autophagy and mitochondrial autophagy markers have been observed in the biological fluids of patients, indicating the activation of these pathways. In line with this, both in vitro and in vivo MS models (induced by pro-inflammatory cytokines, lysyl ovalbumin and copper ketones) exhibit mitochondrial dysfunction, triggering lactate metabolism, enhancing autophagic flux and increasing mitochondrial autophagy. Various autophagy inhibitors, differing in structure and mechanism, have been found to promote myelin synthesis and normalize axonal myelination, while the antipsychotics haloperidol and clozapine significantly reduced dyskinesia induced by copper ketones (92).

Previous studies have also highlighted the role of autophagy in macrophages for MS repair (93). Lipophagy in macrophages has been shown to accelerate MS recovery, with microglia containing lipid droplets playing a pivotal role in MS pathology. Notably, miR-223-mediated suppression of cathepsin B in microglia enhances lipophagy following lysolecithin-induced demyelination in mice, indicating that activation of selective autophagy pathways contributes to myelin lipid degradation during demyelinating injury (94).

A recent study introduced a novel theory involving partial neuronal cell death and an autophagy-positive feedback loop, highlighting the role of the neuronal-astrocyte glutamate-glutamine cycle in ALS. Under optimal conditions, disrupting these cycles could slow ALS progression. Brain vascular damage, such as recurrent embolisms and strokes, may initiate neuronal cell death followed by autophagy. Furthermore, ALS impedes the fusion of autophagosomes and lysosomes, exacerbating cell death. Treatment with alginate has been shown to restore the defective fusion phase and significantly delay disease onset, suggesting its potential as a preventative treatment for ALS (95). This study aligns with our long-held belief that autophagy may indirectly influence the development of MS.

Additionally, inhibiting autophagy leads to mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress, which may increase the risk of MS development. There is a notable imbalance in neuronal autophagy in proteopathies, indicating a link between autophagic dysfunction and the onset of neurodegenerative diseases. Patients with MS exhibit a reduction in CD46 receptors, which facilitate autophagy, further supporting the involvement of autophagy in MS pathology. However, the precise role of mitochondrial autophagy in MS remains unclear. Mitochondrial autophagy, a specialized form of autophagy, is crucial for maintaining mitochondrial function and controlling oxidative stress by eliminating damaged mitochondria. This process often involves the activation of PARKIN and PINK1 on the mitochondrial outer membrane, mediated by calcium-binding and coiled-coil domain-containing protein 2 (CALCOCO2)/nuclear dot protein 52 and OPTN receptors. These receptors enhance mitochondrial autophagy by promoting the interaction between phagocytic vesicle membranes and organellar proteins, aiding mitochondrial sequestration within the autophagosome. Alterations in the CALCOCO2 gene are associated with MS progression, contributing to the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines like TNF-α. Supporting evidence shows that CALCOCO2 is primarily expressed in B cells of peripheral blood mononuclear cells, where its stimulation through mitochondrial autophagy reduces pro-inflammatory cytokine production. This highlights CALCOCO2's protective function in B cells and its potential involvement in autoimmune diseases like MS (96).

Together, these findings suggest that autophagy plays a protective role in MS by reducing oxidative stress and inflammatory responses, thereby hindering disease onset and progression. Furthermore, the aforementioned molecular mechanisms are summarized in Fig. 2. Although numerous studies have indicated that mitochondrial autophagy in MS is closely associated with neurological damage, these investigations often focus on describing the fundamental processes of autophagy while lacking in-depth analysis of its molecular mechanisms. For instance, while PINK1 and Parkin play crucial roles in clearing damaged mitochondria, the changes in their expression levels among patients with MS remain unclear. Furthermore, research generally lacks experimental data to elucidate how they regulate autophagy activity.

Autophagy-associated pathways
involved in MS. Multiple autophagy-related pathways are implicated
in the pathogenesis of MS. Dysregulation of autophagy influences
inflammatory signaling, mitochondrial quality control, endoplasmic
reticulum stress responses and lipid metabolism in neural and glial
cells. Key regulators include miR-223-ATG16L1 signaling, NLRP3
inflammasome activation, mitophagy-related pathways and selective
autophagy receptors. MS, multiple sclerosis; IL-1β, interleukin-1β;
TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α; Th17, T helper 17 cells; NLRP3, NLR
family pyrin domain containing 3; LC3, microtubule-associated
protein 1 light chain 3; Atg12, autophagy-related protein 12;
PINK1, PTEN-induced kinase 1; PARKIN, Parkinson protein 2, E3
ubiquitin-protein ligase; CALCOCO2, calcium-binding and coiled-coil
domain-containing protein 2; CTSB, cathepsin B; ER, endoplasmic
reticulum; UPR, unfolded protein response; LD lipid droplet; AMPK,
adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase; mTOR, mammalian
target of rapamycin; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; PGC-1α,
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator-1α; cAMP,
cyclic adenosine monophosphate; PDE10A, phosphodiesterase 10A; ROS,
reactive oxygen species; NO, nitric oxide.

Figure 2

Autophagy-associated pathways involved in MS. Multiple autophagy-related pathways are implicated in the pathogenesis of MS. Dysregulation of autophagy influences inflammatory signaling, mitochondrial quality control, endoplasmic reticulum stress responses and lipid metabolism in neural and glial cells. Key regulators include miR-223-ATG16L1 signaling, NLRP3 inflammasome activation, mitophagy-related pathways and selective autophagy receptors. MS, multiple sclerosis; IL-1β, interleukin-1β; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α; Th17, T helper 17 cells; NLRP3, NLR family pyrin domain containing 3; LC3, microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3; Atg12, autophagy-related protein 12; PINK1, PTEN-induced kinase 1; PARKIN, Parkinson protein 2, E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase; CALCOCO2, calcium-binding and coiled-coil domain-containing protein 2; CTSB, cathepsin B; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; UPR, unfolded protein response; LD lipid droplet; AMPK, adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; PGC-1α, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator-1α; cAMP, cyclic adenosine monophosphate; PDE10A, phosphodiesterase 10A; ROS, reactive oxygen species; NO, nitric oxide.

The process of autophagy acts as an inhibitor to the progression of MS

Contrary to the previously discussed findings, several studies-both preclinical and clinical-suggest that autophagy may have a harmful effect on the progression of MS (97). Elevated expression of immune-related GTPase M 1 and ATG5 has been observed in T cells from individuals with relapsing-remitting MS (98). Notably, administration of the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin accelerated the progression of relapsing-remitting MS (99). In parallel, MS lesions displayed increased oxidative stress and inflammation, along with a reduced LC3-II:LC3-I ratio, suggesting altered or impaired autophagic flux in demyelinated regions (100). Autophagy has been implicated in both removal of myelin debris and regulation of remyelination, but defective or dysregulated autophagy may delay efficient clearance of myelin fragments and contribute to sustained neuroinflammation and neuronal injury in MS pathology (18). Additionally, stimulating autophagy by activating STAT1 in microglia led to significant white matter damage in mice. A marked increase in T-cell autophagy correlates with the severity and progression of MS.

Consequently, ATG16L2, a regulator of T-cell autophagy, has potential as a biomarker for predicting relapse in patients with MS (101). Clinical trial data reveal a decrease in ATG16L2 mRNA levels in T cells of individuals with MS, suggesting that targeting autophagy could be a viable therapeutic approach in MS (102).

Notably, there is an upregulation of autophagy-related genes and markers in T lymphocytes and tissues in MS (103). For instance, Atg5 mRNA levels are associated with neurological impairments in patients with MS, with autophagy exacerbating the severity of relapsing-remitting MS (104). Furthermore, the heightened levels of mitochondrial autophagy and general autophagic activity in the biological fluids of patients with active MS point to their potential use as indicators of disease severity (105).

Previous studies have demonstrated a significant upregulation of autophagy in T cells from individuals with MS, as evidenced by elevated ATG5 expression, suggesting a close association between ATG5-driven autophagy and enhanced inflammatory capacity in autoreactive lymphocytes (106,107). In this context, autophagy not only supports T-cell survival under inflammatory stress but also influences the functional balance between pathogenic Th17 cells and immunosuppressive regulatory T cells (Tregs), a key determinant of MS disease activity. Dysregulated autophagy has been proposed to favor Th17 polarization while impairing Treg stability, thereby exacerbating immune imbalance and neuroinflammation (108). Therapeutically, rapamycin has been shown to modulate autophagy through mTOR inhibition and to partially restore immune homeostasis by promoting Treg expansion and dampening neuroinflammation (109). Although early clinical studies indicate that rapamycin is generally well tolerated in MS, its cell type-specific effects on T cells, microglia and oligodendrocytes remain insufficiently characterized. Finally, accumulating evidence links MS pathogenesis to both T- and B-cell dysfunction, with Epstein-Barr virus-mediated B-cell activation further amplifying autoimmune responses (110). How autophagy integrates these peripheral and CNS-specific mechanisms into a unified pathogenic framework warrants further investigation.

Mitochondrial dysfunction in MS is accompanied by activation of mitochondrial autophagy, and experimental inhibition of this process has been shown to enhance myelin synthesis in oligodendrocytes and promote axonal remyelination. Consistently, liraglutide attenuates CNS inflammation and demyelination through modulation of the AMPK and pyroptosis-related NLRP3 pathway, indicating a functional link between mitochondrial stress responses, autophagy and demyelinating pathology (111). Furthermore, antipsychotic medications like clozapine and haloperidol alleviate locomotor impairments in mice caused by copper ketone by inhibiting mitochondrial autophagy. FK506-binding protein 5 (FKBP5) has been identified as a regulator of PPAR-γ, playing a role in mitigating mitochondrial autophagy to create a favorable environment for myelin regeneration. By contrast, a lack of myelin triggers PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitochondrial autophagy, where FKBP5 acts as a critical modulator through PPAR-γ. This discovery underscores FKBP5's role in controlling mitochondrial autophagy during the recovery process in demyelinating conditions, offering a potential target for treating demyelinating disorders (112) (Fig. 3).

Context-dependent roles of autophagy
and mitophagy in MS. Autophagy and mitophagy can exert both
detrimental and protective effects during MS progression.
Dysregulation of autophagy-related genes in T cells, mitochondrial
dysfunction and excessive mitophagy contribute to inflammation and
impaired remyelination. Pharmacological modulation of
autophagy-related pathways influences neuroinflammation,
demyelination and myelin regeneration. MS, multiple sclerosis;
Atg5, autophagy-related protein 5; LC3, microtubule-associated
protein 1 light chain 3; PINK1, PTEN-induced kinase 1; IRGM1,
immunity-related GTPase family M member 1; PI3K,
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; AKT, protein kinase B; mTOR,
mammalian target of rapamycin; AMPK, adenosine
monophosphate-activated protein kinase; STAT1, signal transducer
and activator of transcription 1; NLRP3, NLR family pyrin domain
containing 3; PPAR-γ, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ;
FKBP5, FK506-binding protein 5.

Figure 3

Context-dependent roles of autophagy and mitophagy in MS. Autophagy and mitophagy can exert both detrimental and protective effects during MS progression. Dysregulation of autophagy-related genes in T cells, mitochondrial dysfunction and excessive mitophagy contribute to inflammation and impaired remyelination. Pharmacological modulation of autophagy-related pathways influences neuroinflammation, demyelination and myelin regeneration. MS, multiple sclerosis; Atg5, autophagy-related protein 5; LC3, microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3; PINK1, PTEN-induced kinase 1; IRGM1, immunity-related GTPase family M member 1; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; AKT, protein kinase B; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; AMPK, adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase; STAT1, signal transducer and activator of transcription 1; NLRP3, NLR family pyrin domain containing 3; PPAR-γ, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ; FKBP5, FK506-binding protein 5.

Overall, these findings indicate that excessive autophagy activation may drive MS neuropathology, suggesting that autophagy inhibitors could be a promising strategy for slowing the progression of MS. In MS research, although autophagy is recognized as playing a crucial role in disease onset and progression, current studies still face significant limitations in understanding its mechanisms.

Collectively, the evidence summarized above suggests that autophagy in MS does not exert a uniform biological effect but instead operates within a context-dependent spectrum ranging from neuroprotection to neurotoxicity. We propose an overarching conceptual framework in which the functional outcome of autophagy in MS is determined by four interrelated factors: Disease stage, cell type, autophagy subtype and inflammatory-metabolic context.

In the early or compensatory phases of MS, moderate activation of autophagy, particularly selective forms such as mitophagy and lipophagy, appears to be predominantly protective. In this context, autophagy promotes mitochondrial quality control, limits oxidative and nitrosative stress, facilitates lipid clearance in microglia and macrophages, and supports oligodendrocyte survival and myelin regeneration. These effects collectively contribute to the maintenance of CNS homeostasis and the attenuation of neuroinflammation.

By contrast, during active or chronic stages of MS, sustained inflammatory signaling, immune cell hyperactivation and metabolic dysregulation may shift autophagy toward a maladaptive state. Excessive or dysregulated autophagy, particularly within T lymphocytes, microglia and neurons, can amplify immune-mediated damage, promote demyelination and exacerbate axonal injury. In this setting, heightened autophagic flux or prolonged mitophagy may lead to energy depletion, impaired cellular repair and reinforcement of pro-inflammatory circuits.

Importantly, this framework reconciles seemingly contradictory findings in the literature by emphasizing that autophagy intensity alone is insufficient to predict biological outcome. Rather, the balance between selective and non-selective autophagy, the cellular compartment involved, and the temporal dynamics of MS pathology jointly determine whether autophagy functions as a protective adaptive response or a driver of neurodegeneration. This integrative model underscores the need for stage-specific and cell type-targeted modulation of autophagy, rather than global activation or inhibition, as a rational therapeutic strategy in MS.

Discussion

MS is a chronic immune-mediated disorder of the CNS characterized by demyelination, axonal injury and progressive neurodegeneration. While inflammatory immune responses have long been regarded as the primary drivers of MS pathology, increasing evidence suggests that cell-intrinsic stress responses, including autophagy, play a critical modulatory role in disease progression rather than acting as mere downstream consequences of inflammation. Accumulating experimental and clinical studies indicate that autophagy is dysregulated in MS across multiple cellular compartments. Altered expression of canonical autophagy markers, such as Beclin-1, has been observed in animal models and patient-derived samples, alongside perturbations in key regulatory pathways, including Akt/mTOR signaling. These findings collectively suggest that autophagic flux is disturbed in MS. However, most available evidence remains correlative, relying heavily on static measurements of autophagy-related markers, which limits the ability to distinguish between increased autophagy induction and impaired autophagic degradation. This methodological limitation represents a major barrier to establishing causality between autophagy dysfunction and MS pathogenesis. Notably, emerging data increasingly implicate mitochondrial dysfunction and mitochondrial autophagy (mitophagy) in MS. Elevated levels of mitophagy-related markers in cerebrospinal fluid and serum, together with associations between mitochondrial injury and neuroaxonal degeneration, support the notion that mitochondrial quality control is particularly vulnerable in MS. Nevertheless, it remains elusive whether mitophagy activation represents a compensatory neuroprotective response or a maladaptive process contributing to cellular energy failure and neurodegeneration. Importantly, the relative contribution of selective mitophagy vs. non-selective autophagy has not been systematically addressed, highlighting a critical knowledge gap in the field.

Comparative insights from other neurodegenerative diseases further emphasize the complexity of autophagy regulation in neurodegeneration. Although MS and ALS differ substantially in etiology, both diseases exhibit convergent features, including mitochondrial impairment, oxidative stress and defective autophagic clearance. These parallels suggest that shared autophagy-related mechanisms may underlie neurodegenerative vulnerability, while disease-specific regulatory contexts likely determine whether autophagy exerts protective or detrimental effects.

Despite substantial progress, several unresolved questions warrant further investigation. First, the cell-type specificity of autophagy dysregulation in MS remains poorly defined. Most studies focus on neurons or oligodendrocytes in isolation, neglecting the dynamic interactions among immune cells, glial populations and neurons within the inflammatory microenvironment. Second, advances in high-resolution imaging, single-cell transcriptomics and artificial intelligence-based data integration offer unprecedented opportunities to dissect autophagy dynamics at spatial and temporal resolutions previously unattainable. The emerging association between autophagy-related pathways and MRI outcomes further underscores the potential clinical relevance of these approaches (113,114). In patients with relapsing-remitting MS, circulating and cerebrospinal fluid markers of autophagy and mitophagy were found to be significantly elevated during active disease phases and showed quantitative correlations with MRI activity (115). Specifically, levels of Parkin and BNIP3 were increased by ~1.5-2.5 fold in patients with gadolinium-enhancing lesions compared with radiologically inactive patients, and these markers correlated positively with the number of contrast-enhancing lesions (r≈0.40-0.55, P<0.01). Furthermore, autophagy- and mitophagy-related markers displayed moderate associations with T2 lesion load (r≈0.35-0.48), suggesting a link between dysregulated autophagy and MRI-defined inflammatory burden in MS. While MRI metrics reflecting long-term neurodegeneration, such as brain atrophy, were not directly assessed in these studies (113-115), their established relationship with axonal injury markers (e.g., neurofilament light chain) indicates that autophagy-related alterations may be indirectly connected to MRI measures of disease progression.

Finally, although autophagy represents an attractive therapeutic target, its dual role in MS poses significant translational challenges. Both insufficient and excessive autophagy may exacerbate pathology, suggesting that context-dependent and stage-specific modulation, rather than global activation or inhibition, will be required. Beyond mitophagy, relatively underexplored selective autophagy pathways, such as ER autophagy and lipophagy, may also contribute to MS pathology and warrant systematic investigation. Bridging the gap between mechanistic insights and clinical application will require integrative strategies combining molecular biology, systems-level analysis and longitudinal patient studies.

In conclusion, autophagy emerges as a central but complex regulator in MS, positioned at the intersection of immune dysregulation, mitochondrial dysfunction and neurodegeneration. Clarifying its precise mechanistic roles and therapeutic potential remains a critical priority for future research.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors' contributions

DW, MW and HF wrote and revised the review. HS, QF, YZ, GL, YB, YY prepared figures. All authors reviewed the manuscript and have read and approved the final manuscript. Data authentication is not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the Joint Fund of Henan Provincial Science and Technology R&D Project (grant no. 242103810034), Henan Academy of Innovations in Medical Science 'Three Hundreds' Plan (grant no. HNCMS202437), Henan Provincial Young and Middle-aged Health Science and Technology Innovation Leading Talent Training Program (grant no. LJRC2024019) and Heluo Young Talents Support Program (grant no. 2024HLTJ08).

References

1 

Oh J, Vidal-Jordana A and Montalban X: Multiple sclerosis: Clinical aspects. Curr Opin Neurol. 31:752–759. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

MS International Federation: New prevalence and incidence data now available in the Atlas of MS. MS International Federation; 2023

3 

Doshi A and Chataway J: Multiple sclerosis, a treatable disease. Clin Med (Lond). 16(Suppl 6): s53–s59. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Mohseni SO, Au KM, Issa W, Ruan L, Stuve O and Wang AZ: Multiple sclerosis treatments a review of current biomedical engineering approaches. Biomaterials. 313:1228072025. View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Kornberg MD and Calabresi PA: Multiple sclerosis and other acquired demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 17:a0413742025. View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Kooistra SM and Schirmer L: Multiple sclerosis: Glial cell diversity in time and space. Glia. 73:574–590. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar :

7 

Marcus R: What is multiple sclerosis? JAMA. 328:20782022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Katz Sand I: Classification, diagnosis, and differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Curr Opin Neurol. 28:193–205. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Eriksson AM, Emini N, Harbo HF and Berge T: Is DEXI a multiple sclerosis susceptibility gene? Int J Mol Sci. 26:11752025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Quan M, Zhang H, Deng X, Liu H, Xu Y and Song X: Neutrophils, NETs and multiple sclerosis: A mini review. Front Immunol. 16:14878142025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Correale J, Gaitán MI, Ysrraelit MC and Fiol MP: Progressive multiple sclerosis: From pathogenic mechanisms to treatment. Brain. 140:527–546. 2017.

12 

De Keersmaecker E, Guida S, Denissen S, Dewolf L, Nagels G, Jansen B, Beckwée D and Swinnen E: Virtual reality for multiple sclerosis rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 1:CD0138342025.PubMed/NCBI

13 

Berglund R, Guerreiro-Cacais AO, Adzemovic MZ, Zeitelhofer M, Lund H, Ewing E, Ruhrmann S, Nutma E, Parsa R, Thessen-Hedreul M, et al: Microglial autophagy-associated phagocytosis is essential for recovery from neuroinflammation. Sci Immunol. 5:eabb50772020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

D'Arcy MS: Cell death: A review of the major forms of apoptosis, necrosis and autophagy. Cell Biol Int. 43:582–592. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Kumariya S, Ubba V, Jha RK and Gayen JR: Autophagy in ovary and polycystic ovary syndrome: Role, dispute and future perspective. Autophagy. 17:2706–2733. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Chen T, Tu S, Ding L, Jin M, Chen H and Zhou H: The role of autophagy in viral infections. J Biomed Sci. 30:52023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Palmer JE, Wilson N, Son SM, Obrocki P, Wrobel L, Rob M, Takla M, Korolchuk VI and Rubinsztein DC: Autophagy, aging, and age-related neurodegeneration. Neuron. 113:29–48. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Misrielal C, Mauthe M, Reggiori F and Eggen BJL: Autophagy in multiple sclerosis: Two sides of the same coin. Front Cell Neurosci. 14:6037102020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Al-Kuraishy HM, Jabir MS, Al-Gareeb AI, Saad HM, Batiha GES and Klionsky DJ: The beneficial role of autophagy in multiple sclerosis: Yes or no? Autophagy. 20:259–274. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar :

20 

Klionsky DJ, Petroni G, Amaravadi RK, Baehrecke EH, Ballabio A, Boya P, Bravo-San Pedro JM, Cadwell K, Cecconi F, Choi AMK, et al: Autophagy in major human diseases. EMBO J. 40:e1088632021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Parzych KR and Klionsky DJ: An overview of autophagy: Morphology, mechanism, and regulation. Antioxid Redox Signal. 20:460–473. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Ito-Silva VI, Smith BJ and Martins-de-Souza D: The autophagy proteome in the brain. J Neurochem. 169:e162042025. View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Dafsari HS, Martinelli D, Saffari A, Ebrahimi-Fakhari D, Fanto M, Dionisi-Vici C and Jungbluth H: An update on autophagy disorders. J Inherit Metab Dis. 48:e127982025. View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Righes G, Semenzato L, Koutsikos K, Zanato V, Pinton P, Giorgi C and Patergnani S: The role of autophagy in the pathogenesis and treatment of multiple sclerosis. Autophagy Rep. 4:25291962025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Li W, He P, Huang Y, Li YF, Lu J, Li M, Kurihara H, Luo Z, Meng T, Onishi M, et al: Selective autophagy of intracellular organelles: Recent research advances. Theranostics. 11:222–256. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Moreno-Blas D, Adell T and González-Estévez C: Autophagy in tissue repair and regeneration. Cells. 14:2822025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Huang XR, Ye L, An N, Wu CY, Wu HL, Li HY, Huang YH, Ye QR, Liu MD, Yang LW, et al: Macrophage autophagy protects against acute kidney injury by inhibiting renal inflammation through the degradation of TARM1. Autophagy. 21:120–140. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar :

28 

Mizushima N and Komatsu M: Autophagy: Renovation of cells and tissues. Cell. 147:728–741. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Mizushima N and Levine B: Autophagy in human diseases. N Engl J Med. 383:1564–1576. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Mizushima N, Levine B, Cuervo AM and Klionsky DJ: Autophagy fights disease through cellular self-digestion. Nature. 451:1069–1075. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Wu Y, Wang H and Xu H: Autophagy-lysosome pathway in insulin & glucagon homeostasis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 16:15417942025. View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Liu S, Yao S, Yang H, Liu S and Wang Y: Autophagy: Regulator of cell death. Cell Death Dis. 14:6482023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Ma L and Cao Z: Periodontopathogen-related cell autophagy-a double-edged sword. Inflammation. 48:1–14. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar

34 

Zhang J, Zhang J and Yang C: Autophagy in brain tumors: Molecular mechanisms, challenges, and therapeutic opportunities. J Transl Med. 23:522025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Gupta S, Cassel SL, Sutterwala FS and Dagvadorj J: Regulation of the NLRP3 inflammasome by autophagy and mitophagy. Immunol Rev. 329:e134102025. View Article : Google Scholar :

36 

Liao H, Liu S, Ma Q, Huang H, Goel A, Torabian P, Mohan CD and Duan C: Endoplasmic reticulum stress induced autophagy in cancer and its potential interactions with apoptosis and ferroptosis. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 1872:1198692025. View Article : Google Scholar

37 

Glick D, Barth S and Macleod KF: Autophagy: Cellular and molecular mechanisms. J Pathol. 221:3–12. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Ma Y, Lv W, Guo Y, Yin T, Bai Y, Liu Z, Chen C, Yang W, Feng J, Qian W, et al: Histone demethylases in autophagy and inflammation. Cell Commun Signal. 23:242025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Jin S, Li Y, Xia T, Liu Y, Zhang S, Hu H, Chang Q and Yan M: Mechanisms and therapeutic implications of selective autophagy in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Adv Res. 67:317–329. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar :

40 

Levine B and Kroemer G: Biological functions of autophagy genes: A disease perspective. Cell. 176:11–42. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Luo PY, Zou JR, Chen T, Zou J, Li W, Chen Q, Cheng L, Zheng LY and Qian B: Autophagy in erectile dysfunction: focusing on apoptosis and fibrosis. Asian J Androl. 27:166–176. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar :

42 

Yang S, Li M, Lian G, Wu Y, Cui J and Wang L: ABHD8 antagonizes inflammation by facilitating chaperone-mediated autophagy-mediated degradation of NLRP3. Autophagy. 21:338–351. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar :

43 

Miller DR and Thorburn A: Autophagy and organelle homeostasis in cancer. Dev Cell. 56:906–918. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Zhu CZ, Li GZ, Lyu HF, Lu YY, Li Y and Zhang XN: Modulation of autophagy by melatonin and its receptors: Implications in brain disorders. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 46:525–538. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar

45 

Stanigut AM, Tuta L, Pana C, Alexandrescu L, Suceveanu A, Blebea NM and Vacaroiu IA: Autophagy and mitophagy in diabetic kidney disease-a literature review. Int J Mol Sci. 26:8062025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Chen Y, Wang Z, Ma Q and Sun C: The role of autophagy in fibrosis: Mechanisms, progression and therapeutic potential (Review). Int J Mol Med. 55:612025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Zhou R, Zhang Z, Li X, Duan Q, Miao Y, Zhang T, Wang M, Li J, Zhang W, Wang L, et al: Autophagy in high-fat diet and streptozotocin-induced metabolic cardiomyopathy: Mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Int J Mol Sci. 26:16682025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Kim KH and Lee MS: Autophagy-a key player in cellular and body metabolism. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 10:322–337. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

49 

Nutma E, Marzin MC, Cillessen SA and Amor S: Autophagy in white matter disorders of the CNS: Mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. J Pathol. 253:133–147. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar :

50 

Marsh T and Debnath J: Autophagy suppresses breast cancer metastasis by degrading NBR1. Autophagy. 16:1164–1165. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

51 

Zhu Y, Runwal G, Obrocki P and Rubinsztein DC: Autophagy in childhood neurological disorders. Dev Med Child Neurol. 61:639–645. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar

52 

Li G, Sherchan P, Tang Z and Tang J: Autophagy & phagocytosis in neurological disorders and their possible cross-talk. Curr Neuropharmacol. 19:1912–1924. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar

53 

Zhang L, Dai L and Li D: Mitophagy in neurological disorders. J Neuroinflammation. 18:2972021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

54 

Vargas JNS, Hamasaki M, Kawabata T, Youle RJ and Yoshimori T: The mechanisms and roles of selective autophagy in mammals. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 24:167–185. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar

55 

de Barcelos IP, Troxell RM and Graves JS: Mitochondrial dysfunction and multiple sclerosis. Biology (Basel). 8:372019.

56 

Ghosh I, Sankhe R, Mudgal J, Arora D and Nampoothiri M: Spermidine, an autophagy inducer, as a therapeutic strategy in neurological disorders. Neuropeptides. 83:1020832020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

57 

Fang C, Gu L, Smerin D, Mao S and Xiong X: The interrelation between reactive oxygen species and autophagy in neurological disorders. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2017:84951602017. View Article : Google Scholar

58 

Chu CT: Autophagy in neurological diseases: An update. Neurobiol Dis. 122:1–2. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar

59 

Samarasinghe H and Xu J: Hybrids and hybridization in the cryptococcus neoformans and cryptococcus gattii species complexes. Infect Genet Evol. 66:245–255. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

60 

Evans CS and Holzbaur ELF: Autophagy and mitophagy in ALS. Neurobiol Dis. 122:35–40. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar

61 

Yamamoto H and Matsui T: Molecular Mechanisms of macroautophagy, microautophagy, and chaperone-mediated autophagy. J Nippon Med Sch. 91:2–9. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar

62 

Wu L, Lin Y, Song J, Li L, Rao X, Wan W, Wei G, Hua F and Ying J: TMEM175: A lysosomal ion channel associated with neurological diseases. Neurobiol Dis. 185:1062442023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

63 

Hermans G and Van den Berghe G: Clinical review: Intensive care unit acquired weakness. Crit Care. 19:2742015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

64 

Choi AMK, Ryter SW and Levine B: Autophagy in human health and disease. N Engl J Med. 368:651–662. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

65 

Chen Y, Liu H, Guan Y, Wang Q, Zhou F, Jie L, Ju J, Pu L, Du H and Wang X: The altered autophagy mediated by TFEB in animal and cell models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Am J Transl Res. 7:1574–1587. 2015.PubMed/NCBI

66 

Galluzzi L, Bravo-San Pedro JM, Levine B, Green DR and Kroemer G: Pharmacological modulation of autophagy: Therapeutic potential and persisting obstacles. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 16:487–511. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

67 

Ojha CR, Lapierre J, Rodriguez M, Dever SM, Zadeh MA, DeMarino C, Pleet ML, Kashanchi F and El-Hage N: Interplay between autophagy, exosomes and HIV-1 associated neurological disorders: New insights for diagnosis and therapeutic applications. Viruses. 9:1762017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

68 

Tang D, Kang R and Klionsky DJ: Autophagy-dependent ferroptosis mediates multiple sclerosis. Autophagy. 21:257–259. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar :

69 

Dolcetti E, Bruno A, Guadalupi L, Rizzo FR, Musella A, Gentile A, De Vito F, Caioli S, Bullitta S, Fresegna D, et al: Emerging role of extracellular vesicles in the pathophysiology of multiple sclerosis. Int J Mol Sci. 21:73362020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

70 

Ceccariglia S, Sibilia D, Parolini O, Michetti F and Di Sante G: Altered expression of autophagy biomarkers in hippocampal neurons in a multiple sclerosis animal model. Int J Mol Sci. 24:132252023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

71 

Patergnani S, Castellazzi M, Bonora M, Marchi S, Casetta I, Pugliatti M, Giorgi C, Granieri E and Pinton P: Autophagy and mitophagy elements are increased in body fluids of multiple sclerosis-affected individuals. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 89:439–441. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar

72 

Chen S, Zhang X, Song L and Le W: Autophagy dysregulation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain Pathol. 22:110–116. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

73 

Yin L, Liu J, Dong H, Xu E, Qiao Y, Wang L, Zhang L, Jia J, Li L and Geng X: Autophagy-related gene16L2, a potential serum biomarker of multiple sclerosis evaluated by bead-based proteomic technology. Neurosci Lett. 562:34–38. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

74 

Wang JQ, Li Q, He JY, Zhou F, Huang ZH, Wang LB, Zhang Y and Li X: Autophagy in multiple sclerosis: Phagocytosis and autophagy of oligodendrocyte precursor cells. Mol Neurobiol. 61:6920–6933. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

75 

Igci M, Baysan M, Yigiter R, Ulasli M, Geyik S, Bayraktar R, Bozgeyik İ, Bozgeyik E, Bayram A and Cakmak EA: Gene expression profiles of autophagy-related genes in multiple sclerosis. Gene. 588:38–46. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

76 

Cheng Z, Gan W, Xiang Q, Zhao K, Gao H, Chen Y, Shi P, Zhang A, Li G, Song Y, et al: Impaired degradation of PLCG1 by chaperone-mediated autophagy promotes cellular senescence and intervertebral disc degeneration. Autophagy. 21:352–373. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar :

77 

Kausar MA, Anwar S, Khan YS, Saleh AA, Ahmed MAA, Kaur S, Iqbal N, Siddiqui WA and Najm MZ: Autophagy and cancer: Insights into molecular mechanisms and therapeutic approaches for chronic myeloid leukemia. Biomolecules. 15:2152025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

78 

Bao Y, Ma Y, Huang W, Bai Y, Gao S, Xiu L, Xie Y, Wan X, Shan S, Chen C and Qu L: Regulation of autophagy and cellular signaling through non-histone protein methylation. Int J Biol Macromol. 291:1390572025. View Article : Google Scholar

79 

Lei Y and Klionsky DJ: Autophagy as a way to remove DNA lesions. Autophagy. 21:497–499. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar :

80 

Asgari R, Yarani R, Mohammadi P and Emami Aleagha MS: HIF-1α in the crosstalk between reactive oxygen species and autophagy process: A review in multiple sclerosis. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 42:2121–2129. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar

81 

Abulaban AA, Al-Kuraishy HM, Al-Gareeb AI, Elekhnawy E, Alanazi A, Alexiou A, Papadakis M and Batiha GE: Role of fenofibrate in multiple sclerosis. Eur J Med Res. 29:1132024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

82 

Li Y, Zhou D, Ren Y, Zhang Z, Guo X, Ma M, Xue Z, Lv J, Liu H, Xi Q, et al: Mir223 restrains autophagy and promotes CNS inflammation by targeting ATG16L1. Autophagy. 15:478–492. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar :

83 

Cheng J, Liao Y, Dong Y, Hu H, Yang N, Kong X, Li S, Li X, Guo J, Qin L, et al: Microglial autophagy defect causes parkinson disease-like symptoms by accelerating inflammasome activation in mice. Autophagy. 16:2193–2205. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

84 

Liu X, Tuerxun H and Zhao Y, Li Y, Wen S, Li X and Zhao Y: Crosstalk between ferroptosis and autophagy: Broaden horizons of cancer therapy. J Transl Med. 23:182025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

85 

Li W, Wu M, Li Y and Shen J: Reactive nitrogen species as therapeutic targets for autophagy/mitophagy modulation to relieve neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis: Potential application for drug discovery. Free Radic Biol Med. 208:37–51. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

86 

Li S, Wang Y, Liang X and Li Y: Autophagy intersection: Unraveling the role of the SNARE complex in lysosomal fusion in Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 103:979–993. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

87 

Misrielal C, Alsema AM, Wijering MHC, Miedema A, Mauthe M, Reggiori F and Eggen BJL: Transcriptomic changes in autophagy-related genes are inversely correlated with inflammation and are associated with multiple sclerosis lesion pathology. Brain Behav Immun Health. 25:1005102022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

88 

Yazdani Y, Zamani ARN, Majidi Z, Sharafkandi N, Alizadeh S, Mofrad AME, Valizadeh A, Idari G, Radvar AD, Safaie N and Faridvand Y: Curcumin and targeting of molecular and metabolic pathways in multiple sclerosis. Cell Biochem Funct. 41:779–787. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

89 

Vakrakou AG, Alexaki A, Brinia ME, Anagnostouli M, Stefanis L and Stathopoulos P: The mTOR signaling pathway in multiple sclerosis; from animal models to human data. Int J Mol Sci. 23:80772022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

90 

Beckers J, Tharkeshwar AK and Van Damme P: C9orf72 ALS-FTD: Recent evidence for dysregulation of the autophagy-lysosome pathway at multiple levels. Autophagy. 17:3306–3322. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

91 

Ying H and Yue BYJT: Optineurin: The autophagy connection. Exp Eye Res. 144:73–80. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar

92 

Patergnani S, Bonora M, Ingusci S, Previati M, Marchi S, Zucchini S, Perrone M, Wieckowski MR, Castellazzi M, Pugliatti M, et al: Antipsychotic drugs counteract autophagy and mitophagy in multiple sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 118:e20200781182021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

93 

Haidar M, Loix M, Vanherle S, Dierckx T, Vangansewinkel T, Gervois P, Wolfs E, Lambrichts I, Bogie JFJ and Hendriks JJA: Targeting lipophagy in macrophages improves repair in multiple sclerosis. Autophagy. 18:2697–2710. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

94 

Ma H, Ou ZL, Alaeiilkhchi N, Cheng YQ, Chen K, Chen JY, Guo RQ, He MY, Tang SY, Zhang X, et al: MiR-223 enhances lipophagy by suppressing CTSB in microglia following lysolecithin-induced demyelination in mice. Lipids Health Dis. 23:1942024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

95 

Yuan S, Zhang ZW and Li ZL: Cell death-autophagy loop and glutamate-glutamine cycle in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Front Mol Neurosci. 10:2312017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

96 

Di Rita A and Strappazzon F: A protective variant of the autophagy receptor CALCOCO2/NDP52 in multiple sclerosis (MS). Autophagy. 17:1565–1567. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

97 

Xu TT, Deng YY, Yu XY, Li M and Fu YY: Natural autophagy modulators in non-communicable diseases: From autophagy mechanisms to therapeutic potential. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 46:8–32. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar

98 

Lorentzen KC, Prescott AR and Ganley IG: Artificial targeting of autophagy components to mitochondria reveals both conventional and unconventional mitophagy pathways. Autophagy. 21:315–337. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar :

99 

Lu Z, Yan H and Wang H: Autophagy modulates male fertility in Arabidopsis. Autophagy. 21:686–688. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar :

100 

Liang P and Le W: Role of autophagy in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. Neurosci Bull. 31:435–444. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

101 

Jin M and Klionsky DJ: Nuclear proteasomes as a backup for autophagy: Interconnected proteostasis pathways. Autophagy. 21:1–2. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar :

102 

Cooper KF: Cargo hitchhiking autophagy-a hybrid autophagy pathway utilized in yeast. Autophagy. 21:500–512. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

103 

Kim J, Lee Y, Jeon T, Ju S, Kim JS, Kim MS and Kang C: Autophagy-dependent splicing control directs translation toward inflammation during senescence. Dev Cell. 60:364–378.e7. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar

104 

White J, Choi YB, Zhang J, Vo MT, He C, Shaikh K and Harhaj EW: Phosphorylation of the selective autophagy receptor TAX1BP1 by TBK1 and IKBKE/IKKi promotes ATG8-family protein-dependent clearance of MAVS aggregates. Autophagy. 21:160–177. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar :

105 

Jia N, Ganesan D, Guan H, Jeong YY, Han S, Rajapaksha G, Nissenbaum M, Kusnecov AW and Cai Q: Mitochondrial bioenergetics stimulates autophagy for pathological MAPT/Tau clearance in tauopathy neurons. Autophagy. 21:54–79. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar :

106 

Tan N, Luo H, Li W, Ling G, Wei Y, Wang W and Wang Y: The dual function of autophagy in doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity: Mechanism and natural products. Semin Cancer Biol. 109:83–90. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

107 

Paunovic V, Petrovic IV, Milenkovic M, Janjetovic K, Pravica V, Dujmovic I, Milosevic E, Martinovic V, Mesaros S, Drulovic J and Trajkovic V: Autophagy-independent increase of ATG5 expression in T cells of multiple sclerosis patients. J Neuroimmunol. 319:100–105. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

108 

Hu H, Li H, Li R, Liu P and Liu H: Re-establishing immune tolerance in multiple sclerosis: Focusing on novel mechanisms of mesenchymal stem cell regulation of Th17/Treg balance. J Transl Med. 22:6632024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

109 

Mandrioli J, D'Amico R, Zucchi E, De Biasi S, Banchelli F, Martinelli I, Simonini C, Lo Tartaro D, Vicini R, Fini N, et al: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of rapamycin in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat Commun. 14:49702023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

110 

Morandi E, Jagessar SA, 't Hart BA and Gran B: EBV Infection Empowers Human B cells for autoimmunity: Role of autophagy and relevance to multiple sclerosis. J Immunol. 199:435–448. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

111 

Song S, Guo R, Mehmood A, Zhang L, Yin B, Yuan C, Zhang H, Guo L and Li B: Liraglutide attenuate central nervous inflammation and demyelination through AMPK and pyroptosis-related NLRP3 pathway. CNS Neurosci Ther. 28:422–434. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

112 

Sun X, Qian M, Li H, Wang L, Zhao Y, Yin M, Dai L and Bao H: FKBP5 activates mitophagy by ablating PPAR-γ to shape a benign remyelination environment. Cell Death Dis. 14:7362023. View Article : Google Scholar

113 

Genovese AV, Hagemeier J, Bergsland N, Jakimovski D, Dwyer MG, Ramasamy DP, Lizarraga AA, Hojnacki D, Kolb C, Weinstock-Guttman B and Zivadinov R: Atrophied Brain T2 lesion volume at MRI is associated with disability progression and conversion to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Radiology. 293:424–433. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

114 

Gill AJ, Schorr EM, Gadani SP and Calabresi PA: Emerging imaging and liquid biomarkers in multiple sclerosis. Eur J Immunol. 53:e22502282023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

115 

Castellazzi M, Patergnani S, Donadio M, Giorgi C, Bonora M, Fainardi E, Casetta I, Granieri E, Pugliatti M and Pinton P: Correlation between auto/mitophagic processes and magnetic resonance imaging activity in multiple sclerosis patients. J Neuroinflammation. 16:1312019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

  • Abstract
  • View
  • Download
  • Twitter
Copy and paste a formatted citation
Spandidos Publications style
Wang D, Fu Q, Zhao Y, Li G, Bai Y, Yang Y, Song H, Wang M and Fan H: Mechanism of action and clinical application of autophagy in multiple sclerosis (Review). Int J Mol Med 57: 129, 2026.
APA
Wang, D., Fu, Q., Zhao, Y., Li, G., Bai, Y., Yang, Y. ... Fan, H. (2026). Mechanism of action and clinical application of autophagy in multiple sclerosis (Review). International Journal of Molecular Medicine, 57, 129. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2026.5800
MLA
Wang, D., Fu, Q., Zhao, Y., Li, G., Bai, Y., Yang, Y., Song, H., Wang, M., Fan, H."Mechanism of action and clinical application of autophagy in multiple sclerosis (Review)". International Journal of Molecular Medicine 57.5 (2026): 129.
Chicago
Wang, D., Fu, Q., Zhao, Y., Li, G., Bai, Y., Yang, Y., Song, H., Wang, M., Fan, H."Mechanism of action and clinical application of autophagy in multiple sclerosis (Review)". International Journal of Molecular Medicine 57, no. 5 (2026): 129. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2026.5800
Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Wang D, Fu Q, Zhao Y, Li G, Bai Y, Yang Y, Song H, Wang M and Fan H: Mechanism of action and clinical application of autophagy in multiple sclerosis (Review). Int J Mol Med 57: 129, 2026.
APA
Wang, D., Fu, Q., Zhao, Y., Li, G., Bai, Y., Yang, Y. ... Fan, H. (2026). Mechanism of action and clinical application of autophagy in multiple sclerosis (Review). International Journal of Molecular Medicine, 57, 129. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2026.5800
MLA
Wang, D., Fu, Q., Zhao, Y., Li, G., Bai, Y., Yang, Y., Song, H., Wang, M., Fan, H."Mechanism of action and clinical application of autophagy in multiple sclerosis (Review)". International Journal of Molecular Medicine 57.5 (2026): 129.
Chicago
Wang, D., Fu, Q., Zhao, Y., Li, G., Bai, Y., Yang, Y., Song, H., Wang, M., Fan, H."Mechanism of action and clinical application of autophagy in multiple sclerosis (Review)". International Journal of Molecular Medicine 57, no. 5 (2026): 129. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2026.5800
Follow us
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
About
  • Spandidos Publications
  • Careers
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
How can we help?
  • Help
  • Live Chat
  • Contact
  • Email to our Support Team