Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Oncology Letters
      • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • Information for Authors
    • Information for Reviewers
    • Information for Librarians
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Reviewers
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Login Register Submit
  • This site uses cookies
  • You can change your cookie settings at any time by following the instructions in our Cookie Policy. To find out more, you may read our Privacy Policy.

    I agree
Search articles by DOI, keyword, author or affiliation
Search
Advanced Search
presentation
International Journal of Molecular Medicine
Join Editorial Board Propose a Special Issue
Print ISSN: 1107-3756 Online ISSN: 1791-244X
Journal Cover
November-2026 Volume 58 Issue 5

Full Size Image

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

Journals

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.

Molecular Medicine Reports

Molecular Medicine Reports

Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.

Biomedical Reports

Biomedical Reports

Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.

World Academy of Sciences Journal

World Academy of Sciences Journal

Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.

International Journal of Epigenetics

International Journal of Epigenetics

Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.

Medicine International

Medicine International

An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.

Journal Cover
November-2026 Volume 58 Issue 5

Full Size Image

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

  • Article
  • Citations
    • Cite This Article
    • Download Citation
    • Create Citation Alert
    • Remove Citation Alert
    • Cited By
  • Similar Articles
    • Related Articles (in Spandidos Publications)
    • Similar Articles (Google Scholar)
    • Similar Articles (PubMed)
  • Download PDF
  • Download XML
  • View XML
Review Open Access

Neutrophil extracellular traps in cardiovascular disease: Mechanisms and therapeutic implications (Review)

  • Authors:
    • Zhao Wang
    • Mingde Chang
    • Wenyu Shang
    • Yunfeng Jia
    • Xiaoyu Shan
    • Xinnong Chen
    • Yingxi Yang
    • Junping Zhang
  • View Affiliations / Copyright

    Affiliations: Department of Cardiology, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300381, P.R. China, College of Clinical Medical, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan 610075, P.R. China, College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 301617, P.R. China, Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin 300190, P.R. China
    Copyright: © Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
  • Article Number: 323
    |
    Published online on: September 18, 2026
       https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2026.5994
  • Expand metrics +
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

This article is mentioned in:


Abstract

Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are web‑like structures composed of decondensed chromatin and granular proteins. Initially identified as an antimicrobial defense mechanism, NETs have now been demonstrated to be profoundly involved in the processes of sterile inflammation, thrombosis and fibrosis in cardiovascular diseases. The present review systematically delineated the interaction networks between NETs and macrophages, monocytes, endothelial cells, fibroblasts and platelets, untangling NETs as a central hub that integrates the pathological triad of inflammation, thrombosis and fibrosis. Building on this foundation, the specific mechanisms of NETs in cardiac diseases, including acute myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation and heart failure and in vascular diseases, such as atherosclerosis, hypertension and abdominal aortic aneurysm, are elaborated. Finally, from four dimensions, NETs degradation, targeting of NETs components, inhibition of NETosis formation and indirect intervention through inflammatory metabolic pathways, the preclinical evidence and translational bottlenecks of strategies such as DNase I, histone‑neutralizing agents and PAD4 inhibitors were systematically evaluated. The present review aimed to promote the transition of NETs from a fundamental pathological hub into a targetable node for cardiovascular therapy.

Introduction

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death worldwide. In 2023, the global prevalence of CVDs reached 626 million, representing a 19.7% increase compared with 2019, while cardiovascular deaths totaled 19.2 million and accounted for 32% of global mortality (1). If this trend persists, annual CVD-related deaths are projected to approach 23.3 million by 2030 (2). A growing body of evidence indicates that inflammation is a shared pathological basis for numerous CVDs (3-8). Among innate immune cells, neutrophils are among the earliest first-line responders recruited to sites of cardiovascular injury. They arrive within hours of tissue damage and establish the conditions for subsequent inflammatory cell infiltration and tissue remodeling (9). Although neutrophils were historically regarded as short-lived effector cells with limited functions, they are now recognized as active participants in cardiovascular pathological processes through multiple mechanisms, among which the release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) is particularly important (10). NETs are web-like structures composed of decondensed chromatin and granular proteins and were initially identified as an antimicrobial defense mechanism capable of capturing and killing pathogens. However, accumulating evidence over the past decade has demonstrated that NETs can also form under sterile inflammatory conditions and play critical roles in cardiovascular pathophysiology by promoting inflammation, thrombosis and fibrosis. Aberrant NET release has been implicated in nearly all major CVDs; nevertheless, the cellular interactions, molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential associated with NETs remain incompletely understood.

Therefore, the present review systematically integrated the interaction networks between NETs and multiple cell types, including macrophages, monocytes, endothelial cells, fibroblasts and platelets. It further examined the specific mechanisms through which NETs mediate pathological injury in different CVDs and evaluates the clinical translational potential of NET-targeted therapeutic strategies within a 'target-drug-translational status' framework. The present review aims to deepen understanding of the roles of NETs in CVDs, provide further insights into the mechanisms underlying CVD development and progression and identify potential avenues for translating therapeutic strategies into clinical practice.

NETs: An overview

Definition and composition of NETs

In 2004, Brinkmann et al (11) first demonstrated the existence of NETs and showed that they contain neutrophil elastase (NE), cathepsin G, myeloperoxidase (MPO), lactoferrin, gelatinase, histones H1, H2A, H2B, H3 and H4 and H2A-H2B-DNA complexes. Subsequent research has generated extensive proteomic data on NETs. Dwyer et al (12) found that NETs induced by both nonmucoid and mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains contain a conserved group of proteins, irrespective of the inducing factor, which they termed the 'core NET signature'. This conserved protein set includes nucleosome-associated proteins (such as histones), structural proteins (such as coronin-1, β-actin and α-actinin), enzymes (such as NE, transaldolase, thymidine kinase, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and α-enolase) and antimicrobial proteins (such as MPO, lysozyme C, lactoferrin and azurocidin).

However, NETs are not structurally uniform and their protein composition varies according to the inducing stimulus and tissue microenvironment. Proteomic analyses have identified stimulus-specific NET signatures. For example, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA)-induced NETs are enriched in heat shock proteins, whereas lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced NETs contain higher levels of lysosomal proteins, such as LAMP2 (13).

Mechanisms of NET formation

NETs are released by activated neutrophils through a process termed NETosis. The currently recognized pathways of NET formation are broadly classified as NADPH oxidase (NOX)-dependent NETosis, also known as suicidal NETosis and NOX-independent NETosis, also known as vital NETosis. Vital NETosis can be further divided into nuclear DNA-derived and mitochondrial DNA-derived NET (mtNET) subtypes. The specific mechanisms are shown in Fig. 1.

The two major pathways of neutrophil
extracellular trap formation. i) Suicidal NETosis: High
concentrations of LPS, PMA, pathogens and inflammatory mediators
stimulate TLRs, Fcγ and complement receptors on the cell membrane,
triggering endoplasmic reticulum calcium release and extracellular
Ca2+ influx through store-operated calcium channels.
This activates PKC, which subsequently phosphorylates the NOX
complex via the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway, resulting in the generation of
large amounts of membrane-derived ROS. Elevated intracellular
calcium activates PAD4, which catalyzes histone arginine
citrullination and initiates chromatin decondensation.
Concurrently, NOX-derived ROS induce degranulation of azurophilic
granules, releasing MPO and NE. NE cleaves histones, while MPO
synergistically amplifies oxidative signaling, completing full
chromatin decondensation. Downstream calcium signaling and ROS
activate GSDMD, which forms pores in the plasma membrane. The
nuclear envelope disintegrates, decondensed chromatin mixes with
granular proteins and the cell ultimately lyses, releasing NETs.
ii) Vital NETosis: Upon stimulation with A23187, low concentrations
of C5a, Staphylococcus aureus, or low-dose LPS presented by
activated platelets, rapid extracellular Ca2+ influx
directly activates PAD4, driving nuclear chromatin decondensation.
The nuclear envelope buds to form vesicles that release nuclear
DNA-derived vital NETs via exocytosis. Alternatively, under
stimulation with GM-CSF and low-dose LPS, calcium signaling induces
opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore,
generating mtROS and releasing mtDNA. After oxidative modification,
mtDNA associates with granular proteins such as MPO and NE and is
released as mtDNA-type NETs through vesicle secretion or fusion of
mitochondria with the plasma membrane. NETs, neutrophil
extracellular traps; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; PMA, phorbol
12-myristate 13-acetate; TLRs, Toll-like receptors; TNF, tumor
necrosis factor; IL, interleukin; PKC, protein kinase C; PAD4,
peptidylarginine deiminase 4; NOX, NADPH oxidase; Raf, rapidly
accelerated fibrosarcoma; MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase
kinase; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; ROS, reactive
oxygen species; MPO, myeloperoxidase; NE, neutrophil elastase;
GSDMD, gasdermin D; mtROS, mitochondrial ROS; GM-CSF,
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; mtDNA,
mitochondrial DNA. Image created with Figdraw.com,
with permission.

Figure 1

The two major pathways of neutrophil extracellular trap formation. i) Suicidal NETosis: High concentrations of LPS, PMA, pathogens and inflammatory mediators stimulate TLRs, Fcγ and complement receptors on the cell membrane, triggering endoplasmic reticulum calcium release and extracellular Ca2+ influx through store-operated calcium channels. This activates PKC, which subsequently phosphorylates the NOX complex via the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway, resulting in the generation of large amounts of membrane-derived ROS. Elevated intracellular calcium activates PAD4, which catalyzes histone arginine citrullination and initiates chromatin decondensation. Concurrently, NOX-derived ROS induce degranulation of azurophilic granules, releasing MPO and NE. NE cleaves histones, while MPO synergistically amplifies oxidative signaling, completing full chromatin decondensation. Downstream calcium signaling and ROS activate GSDMD, which forms pores in the plasma membrane. The nuclear envelope disintegrates, decondensed chromatin mixes with granular proteins and the cell ultimately lyses, releasing NETs. ii) Vital NETosis: Upon stimulation with A23187, low concentrations of C5a, Staphylococcus aureus, or low-dose LPS presented by activated platelets, rapid extracellular Ca2+ influx directly activates PAD4, driving nuclear chromatin decondensation. The nuclear envelope buds to form vesicles that release nuclear DNA-derived vital NETs via exocytosis. Alternatively, under stimulation with GM-CSF and low-dose LPS, calcium signaling induces opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore, generating mtROS and releasing mtDNA. After oxidative modification, mtDNA associates with granular proteins such as MPO and NE and is released as mtDNA-type NETs through vesicle secretion or fusion of mitochondria with the plasma membrane. NETs, neutrophil extracellular traps; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate; TLRs, Toll-like receptors; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; IL, interleukin; PKC, protein kinase C; PAD4, peptidylarginine deiminase 4; NOX, NADPH oxidase; Raf, rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma; MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; ROS, reactive oxygen species; MPO, myeloperoxidase; NE, neutrophil elastase; GSDMD, gasdermin D; mtROS, mitochondrial ROS; GM-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; mtDNA, mitochondrial DNA. Image created with Figdraw.com, with permission.

i) NOX-dependent NETosis (classical pathway). Also known as suicidal NETosis, this process typically occurs within 2-4 h and culminates in the complete rupture of the neutrophil nuclear envelope and plasma membrane, accompanied by cell death. It can be initiated by high concentrations of LPS, pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus, PMA, high concentrations of complement component C5a, immune complexes and inflammatory mediators such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin (IL)-8. These stimuli activate neutrophil Toll-like receptors (TLRs), Fcγ receptors and complement receptors (14). Following receptor activation, calcium is initially released from endoplasmic reticulum stores, followed by substantial extracellular Ca2+ influx through store-operated calcium channels. The resulting increase in cytosolic calcium activates protein kinase C (PKC), which subsequently initiates the Raf-MEK-ERK signaling pathway (15). This pathway phosphorylates and activates the NOX complex, resulting in the sustained generation of large amounts of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which further increase intracellular calcium levels (16). Calcium-dependent peptidylarginine deiminase 4 (PAD4) is subsequently activated and catalyzes the citrullination of arginine residues in the tails of histones H1, H2A, H3 and H4. Citrullination neutralizes the positive charges of histones, weakens their electrostatic interactions with DNA and initiates chromatin decondensation (17). Concurrently, NOX-derived ROS promote the release of MPO and NE from azurophilic granules into the cytoplasm, after which these enzymes translocate to the nucleus. NE cleaves histones through its proteolytic activity, whereas MPO enhances oxidative signaling and facilitates chromatin relaxation; together, these processes promote complete chromatin decondensation. Downstream ROS and calcium signaling activate gasdermin D (GSDMD), which oligomerizes and forms membrane pores. The nuclear envelope subsequently disintegrates, allowing decondensed chromatin to mix with granule proteins. Finally, the plasma membrane ruptures, releasing large quantities of NETs into the extracellular space (18).

ii) NOX-independent NETosis. Also referred to as vital NETosis, this pathway occurs rapidly, typically within 15-60 min. The plasma membrane remains intact throughout the process, allowing neutrophils to survive and retain their phagocytic and chemotactic functions. This pathway does not depend on plasma membrane-associated NOX-derived ROS, although certain subtypes require mitochondrial ROS (mtROS). It can be divided into two principal categories: i) Nuclear DNA-derived vital NETs: Classical inducers include the calcium ionophore A23187, low concentrations of C5a, S. aureus and low-dose LPS presented by activated platelets. Following stimulation, rapid and substantial extracellular Ca2+ influx directly activates PAD4, which catalyzes histone citrullination and promotes nuclear chromatin decondensation (14). Decondensed chromatin and granule proteins are packaged into vesicles that bud from the nuclear envelope and are released into the extracellular space through exocytosis. Once outside the cell, granule proteins bind to DNA to form web-like NETs. The resulting enucleated neutrophils retain phagocytic vacuoles and remain capable of phagocytosis (19). Notably, stimulation with Candida albicans can induce PAD4-independent vital NETosis, in which chromatin decondensation is mediated solely by NE-dependent histone cleavage without requiring histone citrullination (20). ii) Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)-derived vital NETs: When neutrophils are primed with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and subsequently stimulated with low-dose LPS or C5a, increased calcium signaling induces opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore, resulting in mitochondrial damage, mtROS production and the release of mtDNA (14). After oxidative modification, mtDNA associates with granule proteins, including MPO and NE, to form complexes that are released through mitochondrial vesicle secretion or local fusion of mitochondria with the plasma membrane (21). This process generates mtNETs with mtDNA as their structural backbone, while the neutrophil remains intact and does not undergo lysis.

NETs in the context of cardiovascular disease

Although NETs were initially identified in the context of microbial infection, numerous stimuli relevant to cardiovascular pathology can also induce NETosis. Within the cardiovascular system, NET-inducing stimuli predominantly include lipid metabolites, damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and intercellular signaling, rather than direct stimulation by exogenous pathogens. First, among lipid-related triggers, oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL) and endogenous cholesterol crystals can engage TLR4 and the receptor for advanced glycation end products on the neutrophil surface, thereby promoting sustained neutrophil activation and acting as major chemical initiators of NETosis in lipid-associated CVDs (22,23). Metabolic abnormalities, including hyperglycemia and elevated levels of free fatty acids, can also function as persistent stimuli and induce sustained NET release from perivascular neutrophils (14,24). Second, DAMPs released following tissue injury contribute substantially to NET formation. After myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or organ ischemia-reperfusion injury, necrotic endothelial and parenchymal cells release high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), cell-free mtDNA and extracellular histones (25). These molecules can establish a positive-feedback loop that continuously stimulates circulating neutrophils to generate additional NETs. Third, intercellular signaling associated with vascular injury can induce NETosis. P-selectin expressed on activated platelets binds to P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 (PSGL-1) on neutrophils, thereby promoting NET formation (26). The complement activation product C5a regulates NETosis in a concentration-dependent manner: Low concentrations of C5a primarily induce calcium influx and mtNET formation, whereas high concentrations activate the NOX complex and promote suicidal NETosis (14). Furthermore, cardiovascular risk factors, including monosodium urate crystals, tobacco smoke and fine particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of ≤2.5 µm (PM2.5), can chronically stimulate neutrophils within the vascular wall, thereby sustaining persistent, low-grade NET release (14).

NETs induced in the cardiovascular milieu are enriched with a variety of disease-specific functional molecules that form the molecular basis of their prothrombotic and vascular-damaging effects. First, NETs contain procoagulant proteins: NET fibers display abundant tissue factor (TF) and von Willebrand factor (vWF) on their surfaces. TF directly activates the extrinsic coagulation pathway, whereas vWF captures circulating platelets; moreover, NET-bound NE can degrade tissue factor pathway inhibitor, thereby disrupting the anticoagulant balance and promoting immunothrombosis (27,28). Second, NETs contain matrix-degrading proteases: matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 is abundantly associated with plaque-derived NETs and degrades collagen within the arterial fibrous cap, resulting in cap thinning and increased plaque vulnerability to rupture, thereby precipitating acute cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (29). Third, NETs contain inflammatory chemotactic mediators: NET-associated chemokines such as IL-8 continuously recruit peripheral neutrophils to vascular lesions, thereby perpetuating chronic inflammation (30). At the clinical level, plasma MPO-DNA complexes, circulating citrullinated histone H3 (CitH3) and cell-free mtDNA are specific biomarkers of NET formation in cardiovascular disease; their levels are markedly elevated in patients with coronary artery disease, ischemic stroke and deep vein thrombosis and can be used to assess disease severity (31). However, direct comparative proteomic analyses of NETs across different CVDs remain scarce. Defining disease-specific NET signatures will not only deepen mechanistic understanding but also facilitate the development of targeted diagnostic biomarkers and selective therapeutic strategies.

NETs as a universal cellular interaction network in cardiovascular pathology: Inflammation, thrombosis and fibrosis

NETs are not merely antimicrobial structures; they also function as multifunctional signaling platforms that coordinate crosstalk among diverse cell types in the cardiovascular system. Through their interactions with macrophages, monocytes, endothelial cells, fibroblasts and platelets, NETs establish an integrated cellular network that drives three interrelated pathological processes: inflammation, thrombosis and fibrosis.

NETs and inflammation

At sites of cardiovascular injury, NETs shape and amplify the local inflammatory microenvironment by acting on macrophages, monocytes and endothelial cells. These effects occur at three interconnected levels: Induction of pro-inflammatory macrophage polarization, chemotactic recruitment of monocytes and maintenance of their pro-inflammatory phenotype and pro-inflammatory activation of endothelial cells (Fig. 2).

Mechanisms by which NETs establish
and amplify the inflammatory microenvironment at sites of
cardiovascular injury. NETs form a multicellular pro-inflammatory
network through interactions with macrophages, monocytes and
endothelial cells. i) NETs drive pro-inflammatory macrophage
polarization via the TLR9/NF-κB and NE/Rab5a-NF-κB pathways and
establish inflammatory amplification loops through IL-1β/IL-17 and
IL-8/CXCR2. M1 macrophages, in turn, induce NETosis through the
ARID3A/THBS1/CD47/p38 MAPK axis, creating a bidirectional
positive-feedback loop. ii) NETs upregulate endothelial MCP-1,
which promotes monocyte chemotaxis and maintains their
pro-inflammatory phenotype; MCP-1 reciprocally enhances NET
release, establishing a NETs-MCP-1 loop (3). NETs carry IL-1α and activate
endothelial cells via the TLR4/NF-κB and cGAS-STING pathways,
upregulating adhesion molecules and releasing pro-inflammatory
cytokines, thereby collectively amplifying local inflammation.
NETs, neutrophil extracellular traps; TLR, Toll-like receptor; IL,
interleukin; CXCL, C-X-C motif chemokine ligand; CXCR, C-X-C motif
chemokine receptor; ARID3A, AT-rich interaction domain 3A; THBS1,
thrombospondin 1; CD47, cluster of differentiation 47; p38 MAPK,
p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase; NE, neutrophil elastase;
NF-κB, nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B
cells; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; TNF, tumor necrosis
factor; MPO, myeloperoxidase; CCR, C-C chemokine receptor; ER,
endoplasmic reticulum; TBK1, TANK-binding kinase 1; IRF3,
interferon regulatory factor 3; VCAM, vascular cell adhesion
molecule; ICAM, intercellular adhesion molecule; MCP, monocyte
chemoattractant protein; cGAMP, cyclic GMP-AMP; cGAS-STING, cyclic
GMP-AMP synthase-stimulator of interferon genes. Image created with
Figdraw.com, with permission.

Figure 2

Mechanisms by which NETs establish and amplify the inflammatory microenvironment at sites of cardiovascular injury. NETs form a multicellular pro-inflammatory network through interactions with macrophages, monocytes and endothelial cells. i) NETs drive pro-inflammatory macrophage polarization via the TLR9/NF-κB and NE/Rab5a-NF-κB pathways and establish inflammatory amplification loops through IL-1β/IL-17 and IL-8/CXCR2. M1 macrophages, in turn, induce NETosis through the ARID3A/THBS1/CD47/p38 MAPK axis, creating a bidirectional positive-feedback loop. ii) NETs upregulate endothelial MCP-1, which promotes monocyte chemotaxis and maintains their pro-inflammatory phenotype; MCP-1 reciprocally enhances NET release, establishing a NETs-MCP-1 loop (3). NETs carry IL-1α and activate endothelial cells via the TLR4/NF-κB and cGAS-STING pathways, upregulating adhesion molecules and releasing pro-inflammatory cytokines, thereby collectively amplifying local inflammation. NETs, neutrophil extracellular traps; TLR, Toll-like receptor; IL, interleukin; CXCL, C-X-C motif chemokine ligand; CXCR, C-X-C motif chemokine receptor; ARID3A, AT-rich interaction domain 3A; THBS1, thrombospondin 1; CD47, cluster of differentiation 47; p38 MAPK, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase; NE, neutrophil elastase; NF-κB, nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; MPO, myeloperoxidase; CCR, C-C chemokine receptor; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; TBK1, TANK-binding kinase 1; IRF3, interferon regulatory factor 3; VCAM, vascular cell adhesion molecule; ICAM, intercellular adhesion molecule; MCP, monocyte chemoattractant protein; cGAMP, cyclic GMP-AMP; cGAS-STING, cyclic GMP-AMP synthase-stimulator of interferon genes. Image created with Figdraw.com, with permission.

NETs drive pro-inflammatory macrophage polarization and inflammation amplification

Macrophages are heterogeneous innate myeloid cells that perform diverse functions in host defense, regulation of inflammation, tissue repair and maintenance of homeostasis (32-34). They are often broadly classified into pro-inflammatory M1 and anti-inflammatory M2 phenotypes and play central roles in both the initiation and resolution of inflammatory responses (35). The pro-inflammatory interaction between NETs and macrophages is bidirectional and forms a positive-feedback loop. A recent study has shown that pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages can directly induce NETosis through the transcription factor ARID3A (36). Following its nuclear translocation in M1 macrophages under inflammatory conditions, ARID3A binds directly to the THBS1 promoter and activates its transcription, thereby promoting substantial THBS1 secretion. Secreted THBS1 then engages the CD47 receptor on neutrophils, activates the p38 MAPK signaling pathway and specifically induces NET release (36). These findings indicate that NET-activated macrophages can, in turn, promote further NET formation, creating a self-reinforcing inflammatory amplification circuit. NETs complete this positive-feedback loop by driving pro-inflammatory macrophage polarization and amplifying inflammation through several synergistic pathways. At the molecular level, NET-associated DNA is recognized by TLR9 in macrophages, activating the NF-κB signaling cascade and inducing the transcription of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-1β, IL-8 and TNF-α (22,30). Following internalization by macrophages, NET-associated NE further activates the intracellular Rab5a-NF-κB pathway, thereby sustaining NF-κB-dependent inflammatory gene expression (37). These mechanisms establish two positive-feedback circuits. First, NET-induced IL-1β secretion increases T cell-derived IL-17 production, which induces C-X-C motif chemokine ligand (CXCL) 1 and CXCL2 expression, recruits additional neutrophils and sustains a self-reinforcing cycle of NET release and macrophage activation (22). Second, macrophage-derived IL-8 induces further NET release through C-X-C motif chemokine receptor (CXCR) 2 on neutrophils; the resulting NETs then stimulate additional IL-8 production, forming a bidirectional IL-8-CXCR2 inflammatory amplification loop (30). Moreover, NETs inhibit autophagosome formation in macrophages through the EGFR-Beclin-1 pathway. The resulting impairment of autophagy further enhances inflammasome activity and promotes IL-1β maturation, thereby reinforcing the pro-inflammatory response at the level of post-translational processing (38).

Notably, the functional consequences of NET-macrophage interactions are not uniformly pro-inflammatory but are modulated by the tissue microenvironment. For example, the effects of NETs vary between human and murine macrophages and according to oxygen availability. Under normoxic conditions, NETs markedly upregulate the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-6 in human THP-1-derived macrophages (39). By contrast, NETs strongly suppress pro-inflammatory cytokine expression in murine macrophages under both normoxic and hypoxic conditions (39). The mechanistic basis for these species- and context-dependent effects remains incompletely understood and may reflect differences in macrophage origin, differentiation state, or oxygen-sensing pathways.

NETs regulate monocyte chemotactic recruitment and maintenance of pro-inflammatory phenotype

Monocytes are highly plastic innate immune cells. The monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1/CCR2 chemokine axis is a central mechanism governing monocyte recruitment to inflammatory sites. NETs regulate monocyte recruitment and phenotype through several interconnected mechanisms. First, NETs stimulate vascular endothelial cells to markedly increase MCP-1 transcription and secretion, establishing a local chemotactic gradient that directs circulating monocytes toward sites of injury. In turn, MCP-1 can prime neutrophils, promoting robust NET release upon secondary stimulation. This establishes a bidirectional NET-MCP-1 inflammatory amplification loop that sustains local inflammatory infiltration (40). Second, NETs drive the transition of monocytes from the classical to the intermediate subset while downregulating the repair-associated molecule CX3CR1. These effects maintain monocytes in a pro-inflammatory state, impair their tissue-reparative capacity and prolong local inflammatory injury (41). Furthermore, NETs can downregulate CCR2 expression on the monocyte surface, thereby inhibiting MCP-1-mediated directional migration. This disrupts the homeostatic regulation of immune-cell recruitment and shifts inflammatory infiltration from regulated chemotaxis toward dysregulated aggregation (40).

NETs activate a pro-inflammatory endothelial cell phenotype

Endothelial cells form the innermost barrier of the vessel wall and endothelial dysfunction is a critical step in the initiation of inflammation. NETs can carry mature IL-1α and, together with cathepsin G, activate endothelial cells, markedly increasing the expression of leukocyte adhesion molecules such as vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1 and intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 and thereby facilitating leukocyte adhesion and transendothelial infiltration (42). NETs can also activate the endothelial TLR4/NF-κB signaling axis through an MPO/H2O2-dependent pathway, thereby driving endothelial cells toward a broadly pro-inflammatory phenotype (43). At the level of intracellular DNA sensing, the cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS)-stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway serves as a central axis through which NETs amplify endothelial inflammation. NETs activate cGAS-STING signaling through TLR2 on the endothelial cell surface. Sequence-independent binding of double-stranded DNA activates cGAS, which catalyzes the synthesis of the second messenger 2′,3′-cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP). cGAMP subsequently binds to endoplasmic reticulum-localized STING, inducing its oligomerization and trafficking to the Golgi apparatus, where STING recruits and activates TBK1 kinase (44-46). Activated TBK1 phosphorylates both IRF3 and the NF-κB p65 subunit (44,45). IRF3 signaling drives robust type I interferon secretion, whereas NF-κB activation induces multiple pro-inflammatory cytokines; together, these responses amplify the local inflammatory response (44,45).

NETs and thrombosis

NETs drive immunothrombosis by inducing procoagulant activity in endothelial cells and activating platelets, thereby forming a key interface at which inflammation and thrombosis reinforce each other in cardiovascular disease. In this pathological sequence, NETs first shift endothelial cells from an anticoagulant to a procoagulant phenotype, providing the initiating signal for subsequent platelet adhesion and activation. Activated platelets and NETs then establish a bidirectional amplification loop that markedly augments the initial thrombotic signal and ultimately promotes the formation of stable immunothrombi.

NETs induce a procoagulant endothelial cell phenotype

Under homeostatic conditions, endothelial cells possess intrinsic anticoagulant properties; however, endothelial injury markedly increases the risk of local thrombosis (47). NETs act synergistically with IL-1α and cathepsin G to stimulate endothelial cells, increase TF transcription and procoagulant activity and thereby directly enhance the local propensity for coagulation (42). The cGAS-STING pathway also mediates endothelial procoagulant activity. In addition to inducing pro-inflammatory cytokines, activated NF-κB promotes TF transcription and downregulates endothelial anticoagulant molecules. Together, these effects establish a procoagulant endothelial phenotype (47).

NETs-platelet bidirectional amplification loop

Platelets are central mediators at the interface between inflammation and thrombosis and their bidirectional interactions with NETs continuously amplify the local immunothrombotic microenvironment. Platelet-driven NETosis occurs through several mechanisms. P-selectin on the platelet surface induces NET release by binding to PSGL-1 on neutrophils (48). TLR4-activated platelets can adhere directly to neutrophils and induce NETosis, whereas the interaction between platelet integrin αIIbβ3 and neutrophil SLC44A2 triggers intracellular calcium mobilization and promotes NOX-dependent NET release. Soluble mediators released from degranulating platelets, including thromboxane, PF4, vWF and HMGB1, can also act as upstream triggers of NETosis (49,50).

A mutually reinforcing positive-feedback loop operates between platelets and NETs. S100A8/A9 can induce platelet pyroptosis and the release of oxidized mitochondrial DNA, which further promotes NET formation. In turn, S100A8/A9 released from NETs can induce additional platelet pyroptosis, perpetuating the local inflammatory-thrombotic response (51). One study has further delineated this bidirectional mechanism, showing that double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), a structural component of NETs, is a central effector of platelet hyperactivation (52). A functional platelet-intrinsic cGAS-STING signaling axis specifically recognizes intracellular dsDNA and initiates a distinct signaling cascade that enhances thrombotic potential. Following uptake by platelets, NET-derived dsDNA activates the cytosolic DNA sensor cGAS, which catalyzes the production of the second messenger cGAMP. cGAMP binds to endoplasmic reticulum-localized STING and induces its oligomerization and trafficking, leading to activation of the downstream NLRP3 inflammasome. Activated NLRP3 promotes caspase-1 cleavage and the maturation and release of IL-1β. IL-1β subsequently modulates outside-in signaling through platelet integrin αIIbβ3, increasing the phosphorylation of Src, Syk and PLCγ2 and promoting intracellular calcium influx. These events ultimately enhance platelet aggregation, granule release, spreading and clot retraction (52).

NETs and fibrosis

NETs promote pathological fibrosis in cardiovascular tissues through three principal mechanisms: Direct activation of fibroblasts, induction of monocyte-to-fibroblast-like transdifferentiation and promotion of endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndoMT). The pro-fibrotic matrix deposition and tissue-invasive capacity conferred on monocytes by NETs provide an important link between inflammation and fibrosis.

NETs directly activate fibroblasts

Fibroblasts are the principal stromal cells responsible for maintaining tissue homeostasis. Under physiological conditions, they synthesize and secrete extracellular matrix (ECM) and contribute to tissue development and normal structural repair. Following tissue injury, local stress signals and the inflammatory microenvironment activate quiescent fibroblasts, inducing proliferation, directed migration and extensive synthesis of matrix components and thereby initiating the tissue-repair program (53). Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) is a central regulator of matrix remodeling. Downstream TGF-β signaling can activate several cascades, including SMAD, MAPK and RhoA, which regulate the transcription and modification of type I and type III collagens. Persistent overactivation of this pathway causes abnormal collagen accumulation and promotes pathological tissue fibrosis (54-57). Studies have shown that NETs can directly promote the pro-fibrotic activation of fibroblasts by targeting the TGF-β signaling axis. Under hypoxic conditions, NETs markedly increase TGF-β transcript levels in fibroblasts. Concurrently, NETs directly induce fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transition, enhance fibroblast migration and increase the levels of type I collagen, phosphorylated SMAD2, phosphorylated p38 and RhoA. These changes collectively activate the SMAD, MAPK and RhoA pro-fibrotic pathways and promote excessive matrix deposition (58,59). In addition to TGF-β signaling, NET-associated histones and MPO can induce substantial ROS production, further stimulating fibroblast activation and proliferation and exacerbating dysregulated ECM remodeling (60).

As well as directly activating the fibroblast fibrotic program, NETs can indirectly amplify matrix remodeling by reshaping the local inflammatory microenvironment. NET release is accompanied by the release of various pro-inflammatory mediators, including TNF-α and IL-6, which coordinately regulate fibroblast function. TNF-α primarily promotes fibroblast proliferation, whereas IL-6 both induces cell proliferation and increases ECM synthesis (61-64). A recent study has also shown that NETs can promote fibrosis by inducing pyroptosis in cardiac fibroblasts (65). NETs directly increase the levels of NLRP3, caspase-1 and GSDMD-N, triggering canonical pyroptosis characterized by plasma membrane rupture and the release of intracellular contents. Simultaneously, NETs upregulate type I collagen and α-SMA expression. This pyroptotic response is accompanied by substantial secretion of IL-1β and IL-6 (65). However, the specific upstream and downstream molecular pathways mediating this process remain unclear.

NETs induce monocyte-to-fibroblast-like transdifferentiation and tissue invasion

NETs not only promote fibrosis indirectly through inflammatory signaling but also directly regulate monocyte differentiation and effector functions, converting monocytes into active participants in ECM degradation and deposition. NETs induce the transdifferentiation of monocytes into fibroblast-like cells through TLR4 signaling, leading to extensive collagen deposition and directly contributing to pathological fibrosis (40). During tissue invasion, NET-derived DNA is recognized by monocytes and upregulates the alarmin S100A9. S100A9 then activates TLR4 signaling in monocytes in an autocrine manner and induces substantial MMP-9 synthesis, thereby enhancing monocyte tissue invasiveness and exacerbating ECM degradation and disruption of tissue architecture (66). This mechanism directly links the inflammatory regulatory functions of NETs to subsequent matrix remodeling and provides an important cellular basis for their role in bridging early inflammation and later fibrosis. Monocytes thus function as both responders to inflammatory signals and architects of the fibrotic microenvironment.

NETs drive EndoMT

Endothelial cells can undergo EndoMT, during which they lose endothelial-specific markers such as VE-cadherin and concomitantly upregulate mesenchymal markers, including α-smooth muscle actin, vimentin and type I collagen. These changes confer myofibroblast-like properties and enable the synthesis and secretion of large amounts of matrix proteins, thereby promoting abnormal tissue fibrosis (67). Low levels of NETs can be rapidly cleared by endothelial cells through the receptor for advanced glycation end products without inducing pathological changes. However, when NETs accumulate extensively in the microenvironment, NET-bound elastase cleaves VE-cadherin and disrupts the structural integrity of the endothelial monolayer while simultaneously activating β-catenin signaling. Together, these effects induce a sustained EndoMT phenotype and promote excessive ECM deposition (68).

An integrative perspective: NETs as a central hub of the inflammation-thrombosis-fibrosis axis

Growing evidence indicates that inflammation, thrombosis and fibrosis are not isolated pathological events in cardiovascular disease but instead form an interconnected network of mutually reinforcing and sequential processes. NETs serve as a central integrative node within this triad.

NETs establish a bidirectional amplification loop between inflammation and thrombosis. NET-associated IL-1α and cathepsin G, together with the activation of endothelial TLR2 and downstream cGAS-STING signaling, synergistically upregulate TF and adhesion molecules, shifting the endothelium toward a pro-inflammatory and procoagulant phenotype (46,60). Activated platelets, in turn, potently induce NETosis through multiple pathways, including P-selectin/PSGL-1, TLR4 and αIIbβ3-SLC44A2. Conversely, NET components such as S100A8/A9 and dsDNA activate platelets; S100A8/A9 induces platelet pyroptosis, whereas dsDNA elicits cGAS-STING-dependent platelet activation. Together, these reciprocal interactions form a bidirectional platelet-NET amplification loop that continuously reinforces the local immunothrombotic microenvironment (48-51). During acute events such as myocardial infarction and plaque erosion, this inflammation-thrombosis axis is particularly prominent. NET-rich thrombi not only exacerbate ischemic tissue injury but also promote further recruitment of inflammatory cells.

NETs also link early inflammation to subsequent fibrosis. NET-recruited monocytes can transdifferentiate into fibroblast-like cells and directly contribute to ECM production (40). At the endothelial level, NET-associated elastase cleaves VE-cadherin and activates β-catenin signaling, inducing EndoMT and the acquisition of a myofibroblast-like phenotype (68). Furthermore, NETs directly activate cardiac fibroblasts through the TGF-β/SMAD, MAPK and RhoA signaling axes, promoting collagen deposition and myofibroblast differentiation (58,59).

A bidirectional relationship also exists between thrombosis and fibrosis. The thrombotic network formed by NETs and fibrin provides a structural scaffold for fibroblast migration and matrix deposition (69,70). Meanwhile, thrombin and other coagulation proteases generated through the NET-driven coagulation cascade can activate protease-activated receptors on the fibroblast surface, further reinforcing the fibrotic response and promoting the gradual progression of thrombotic lesions toward fibrosis (71).

Collectively, these findings support a unified model in which NETs act as a central hub that integrates and propagates the inflammation-thrombosis-fibrosis cascade in cardiovascular pathology. This framework has potential therapeutic implications: targeting NETs may attenuate all three arms of the cascade and therefore offer broader clinical benefits than inhibiting a single pathological component.

NETs in cardiac diseases

NETs contribute to a broad spectrum of CVDs and participate in the pathogenesis of multiple cardiac conditions. Building on the general inflammation-thrombosis-fibrosis framework aforementioned, this section examines the roles of NETs in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), atrial fibrillation (AF), viral myocarditis (VMC), endocarditis and heart failure (HF), with an emphasis on disease-specific mechanisms.

AMI

In AMI, NETs are not merely markers of sterile inflammation but also constitute an important mechanistic link between the initial inflammatory burst and subsequent reparative fibrosis. Clinical studies have consistently demonstrated that coronary thrombi and infarcted myocardial tissue from patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are enriched in NETs and that a greater NET burden is closely associated with microvascular obstruction, adverse left ventricular remodeling and worse clinical outcomes (72-75).

The intense sterile inflammatory response triggered by myocardial infarction makes NET-monocyte interactions a major determinant of repair quality. NETs stimulate vascular endothelial cells to secrete large amounts of MCP-1. High local concentrations of MCP-1, in turn, prime neutrophils for NETosis, establishing a positive-feedback loop between NETs and MCP-1 in the infarct zone that directs monocyte infiltration (40). Following NET stimulation, infiltrating monocytes transdifferentiate into fibroblast-like cells through TLR4 signaling, directly participate in collagen deposition and become an important cellular source of post-infarction fibrosis (75). These findings suggest that NETs function as a molecular switch in AMI, redirecting the acute defensive response toward pro-fibrotic remodeling.

Studies have further clarified the upstream triggers and downstream amplification mechanisms of NETosis. Zhang et al (76) found that post-infarction hypoxia induces high S100A12 expression in neutrophils through HIF1α. S100A12 then binds to ANXA5, triggering calcium influx and activating the NOX4-ROS-ERK pathway to drive 'suicidal' NETosis, thereby aggravating cardiac dysfunction. In parallel, dsDNA released from NETs activates the cGAS-STING-NLRP3 pathway in platelets, enhancing platelet activation and thrombus formation and further worsening myocardial ischemia (52). Together, these studies delineate a pathogenic sequence in which the S100A12-ANXA5-Ca2+ axis initiates NETosis, whereas the dsDNA-cGAS-platelet pathway amplifies thrombotic injury following NET release. These mechanisms operate sequentially as upstream and downstream components of the same pathogenic cascade. Notably, during the later stages of infarct healing, moderate NET levels may facilitate the clearance of necrotic tissue by promoting Mertk+ reparative macrophage polarization (77), suggesting that NETs exert stage-dependent effects in AMI. Therefore, transient suppression of excessive NETosis during the early phase, while preserving the physiological functions of NETs during tissue repair, may represent a more rational therapeutic strategy. However, the longitudinal dynamics of NET activity in humans following myocardial infarction remain poorly characterized. Identifying the signals that terminate NETosis and define the repair window is therefore an important priority for translational research.

AF

AF is the most common sustained tachyarrhythmia and atrial remodeling is central to its initiation and maintenance. Early histological studies showed that approximately two-thirds of patients with 'lone AF' exhibited localized atrial inflammation that met the criteria for myocarditis (78). NETosis has been shown to participate in the inflammatory response associated with AF (79), making NETs an emerging focus of AF pathophysiology research.

Emerging evidence indicates that NETs are not merely an inflammatory epiphenomenon in AF but instead function as a central hub driving atrial remodeling. He et al (80) found that elevated angiotensin II (Ang II) levels in AF increase AKT phosphorylation in neutrophils through the AT1 receptor. However, because the mTOR pathway is simultaneously inhibited, Ang II does not induce autophagy and is insufficient to initiate NETosis alone; instead, it synergizes with inflammatory stimuli to enhance NET release. Meanwhile, mtDNA and HMGB1 released following rapid pacing-induced mitochondrial damage in cardiomyocytes can act directly as DAMPs and trigger NETosis. Meng et al (81) further showed that chronic stress induces high S100A8/A9 expression in atrial tissue. S100A8/A9 recruits neutrophils and activates the TLR4-NLRP3 inflammatory pathway, providing another upstream trigger of NETosis. Downstream, NETs exert distinct effects on cardiomyocytes and fibroblasts. In cardiomyocytes, NETs induce autophagic apoptosis by upregulating p62/Beclin-1/LC3B signaling and cause irreversible mitochondrial damage through mitochondrial membrane depolarization and a burst of mtROS. In fibroblasts, NETs activate Smad/p-p38 MAPK signaling, promote fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transition and exacerbate atrial fibrosis and electrical remodeling (80). Collectively, these findings delineate a self-sustaining pathogenic circuit in AF: Ang II-mediated synergistic signaling and the S100A8/A9-TLR4 axis initiate NETosis; DAMPs such as mtDNA and HMGB1 sustain NET formation; and NET-induced mitochondrial damage promotes the release of additional mtDNA. These three components establish a positive-feedback loop that can persist independently of the initial stressor, thereby driving the perpetuation and recurrence of AF.

However, some gaps remain in AF research. Although NETs induce mitochondrial damage and mtDNA release, direct experimental evidence that the classical mtDNA-cGAS-STING cytosolic DNA-sensing pathway is activated in AF and amplifies the inflammatory cycle is currently lacking.

VMC

VMC is myocardial inflammation caused by viral infection and may progress to dilated cardiomyopathy or HF. In a mouse model of coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3)-induced VMC, NETs were detected in both serum and myocardial tissue and NET degradation markedly attenuated the severity of inflammation (82). The attenuation of inflammation following NET degradation provides causal evidence that NETs participate in the inflammatory pathology of VMC.

Recent research using the CVB3 myocarditis model has identified a previously unrecognized mechanism through which CVB3 infection regulates NETosis. CVB3 infection markedly upregulates calpain small subunit 1 (CAPNS1) expression in neutrophils. CAPNS1 binds to the catalytic subunit calpain-1, which then directly cleaves the nuclear envelope protein nesprin-1. This disrupts nuclear envelope integrity, permits chromatin release and thereby drives NETosis (83). However, the specific mechanisms through which NETs contribute to VMC-associated inflammation remain unexplored. Subsequent studies showed that CVB3 infection induces the mitochondrial accumulation of calpain-1, leading sequentially to ATP5A1 cleavage, excessive mitochondrial ROS production, mitochondrial dysfunction, NLRP3 inflammasome activation and cardiomyocyte pyroptosis (84). These findings raise the possibility that NETs promote VMC-associated inflammation by disrupting mitochondrial function and activating NLRP3, a hypothesis that warrants further investigation.

Importantly, NETs may exert context-dependent protective and pathological effects in VMC. NETs can restrict the intercellular spread of viruses; therefore, indiscriminate NET depletion may increase the viral load and promote tissue dissemination. This trade-off represents a broader challenge for NET-targeted anti-inflammatory strategies in infectious diseases. Future interventions should selectively suppress the pathological effects of NETs without compromising host defense.

Endocarditis

Endocarditis is inflammation of the inner lining of the heart and its valves and may present acutely or chronically. It is broadly categorized as infective endocarditis (IE) or non-IE. IE is a severe, potentially fatal cardiac disease characterized by direct pathogen invasion of the heart valves, resulting in valvular damage, vegetation formation and inflammation. Li et al (85) detected NETs in the peripheral blood of patients with IE and found that elevated NET levels were markedly associated with poor prognosis. During IE pathogenesis, NETs do not function as host bactericidal effectors; instead, pathogens 'hijack' them to create a central platform for vegetation formation and immune evasion. This process may occur through both classical and nonclassical pathways. In the classical pathway, Streptococcus mutans bridges to platelet Fcγ receptors via specific IgG, thereby upregulating platelet P-selectin expression through the Src family kinase/Syk/PI3K/p38 MAPK signaling pathway (86). Activated platelets subsequently bind to PSGL-1 on the neutrophil surface via P-selectin, providing one of the key signals that trigger NETosis. Simultaneously, bacteria stimulate neutrophil ROS production and induce histone H3 citrullination via TLR2/FcγR signaling. Both signals are indispensable and act together to drive NET release (86). The nonclassical pathway is mediated directly by EsxA, an effector protein secreted through the type VII secretion system of Streptococcus gordonii. EsxA can induce NETosis at a distance and in a dose-dependent manner, independently of platelets, thereby enabling bacteria to evade phagocytosis during the early stages of bloodstream infection (87). Through their DNA scaffolds and histone components, the released NETs physically entrap and immobilize bacteria-platelet aggregates, promoting the formation of multilayered, biofilm-like vegetations. They also activate the coagulation cascade by promoting thrombin generation and enhance platelet aggregation, thereby establishing a self-amplifying bacteria-platelet-NET feedback loop that drives continued vegetation growth (88). Notably, in the aforementioned studies, NETs exhibited no direct bactericidal activity against the pathogens tested. Instead, they encased the bacteria and consolidated free-floating organisms into biofilm-like vegetations that were difficult to eradicate.

Regarding non-IE, a case report involving patients with systemic lupus erythematosus suggested that Libman-Sacks endocarditis may be associated with NETs (89). However, mechanistic evidence supporting this association remains extremely limited and currently consists only of isolated case observations. Systematic studies are therefore needed to determine whether NETs have a causal role in non-IE.

HF

HF is a clinical syndrome resulting from structural and functional abnormalities of the heart and is among the leading causes of death worldwide (90). Persistent low-grade inflammation is recognized as a central mechanism underlying the pathogenesis and progression of HF (91) and NETs are emerging as important mediators linking immune-mediated inflammation to myocardial energy failure. Clinical studies have shown that serum NET levels are markedly elevated in patients with HF and are associated with poor prognosis (92,93).

Studies have identified NETs as active drivers of HF progression rather than merely inflammatory biomarkers. Tang et al (94) found that elevated Ang II levels in HF downregulate the transcription factor KLF2 in neutrophils and relieve suppression of the HIF1α pathway, thereby promoting neutrophil infiltration into the heart and NET release. Zhang et al (95) further showed that HMGB1 released following pressure overload-induced myocardial injury acts as a DAMP, directly recruiting neutrophils and inducing NETosis. Furthermore, Mang et al (96) demonstrated that vWF/ADAMTS13 imbalance in HF results in excessive vWF accumulation, which activates NET formation through SLC44A2 on the neutrophil surface. Zhao et al (97) found that downregulation of the endogenous anti-inflammatory protein DEL-1 relieves inhibition of p38 signaling in neutrophils, providing another upstream mechanism for initiating NETosis. Downstream, NET-associated NE activates TLR4-p38 signaling in cardiomyocytes, suppresses peroxisome pro liferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha (PGC-1α)-mediated mitochondrial biogenesis and causes mitochondrial respiratory dysfunction and cardiomyocyte apoptosis (96). NETs also serve as procoagulant scaffolds that induce immunothrombosis in the myocardial microvasculature, resulting in episodes of ischemia, hypoxia and microcirculatory dysfunction (94). In addition, NETs promote macrophage infiltration and exacerbate cardiac inflammation (95,97). Together, these pathways define the mechanistic framework through which NETs contribute to HF. Neurohormonal activation mediated by Ang II, the release of damage-associated signals such as HMGB1 and coagulation-factor imbalance involving VWF initiate NETosis. NET-induced mitochondrial injury and microthrombosis then promote further DAMP release and aggravate ischemia. These mechanisms establish a self-sustaining positive-feedback loop that persists independently of the initial stressor and drives the progression and deterioration of HF. Notably, empagliflozin can disrupt the HMGB1-NET axis, suggesting that the clinical benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors may be mediated partly through NET-related pathways. This possibility warrants further validation (Fig. 3).

Mechanisms by which NETs drive the
progression of heart failure. i) Upstream initiation: Ang II
downregulates KLF2, thereby relieving the suppression of HIF1α;
myocardial injury releases HMGB1; an imbalance in vWF/ADAMTS13
activates NETosis via SLC44A2; and downregulation of DEL-1 relieves
the inhibition of p38 signaling. Together, these pathways induce
NET formation. ii) Downstream effects: The NET component NE
inhibits PGC-1α through the TLR4-p38 pathway, impairing
mitochondrial biogenesis and function in cardiomyocytes and leading
to myocardial apoptosis. NETs also serve as a procoagulant
scaffold, triggering microvascular immunothrombosis and causing
microcirculatory disturbance. Meanwhile, they promote macrophage
infiltration, aggravating cardiac inflammation (3). Positive-feedback loop:
Mitochondrial damage leads to cardiomyocyte apoptosis and the
release of DAMPs, while microthrombosis exacerbates ischemia. These
events, in turn, reactivate the upstream NETosis pathways,
establishing a self-sustaining pro-inflammatory cycle that drives
the self-perpetuation and deterioration of heart failure. NETs,
neutrophil extracellular traps; Ang II, angiotensin II; KLF2,
Krüppel-like factor 2; HIF1α, hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha;
ADAMTS13, a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin
type 1 motif, member 13; SLC44A2, solute carrier family 44 member
2; DEL-1, developmental endothelial locus-1; HMGB1, high-mobility
group box 1;vWF, von Willebrand factor; NE, neutrophil elastase;
PGC-1α; TLR, Toll-like receptor. Image created with Figdraw.com, with permission.

Figure 3

Mechanisms by which NETs drive the progression of heart failure. i) Upstream initiation: Ang II downregulates KLF2, thereby relieving the suppression of HIF1α; myocardial injury releases HMGB1; an imbalance in vWF/ADAMTS13 activates NETosis via SLC44A2; and downregulation of DEL-1 relieves the inhibition of p38 signaling. Together, these pathways induce NET formation. ii) Downstream effects: The NET component NE inhibits PGC-1α through the TLR4-p38 pathway, impairing mitochondrial biogenesis and function in cardiomyocytes and leading to myocardial apoptosis. NETs also serve as a procoagulant scaffold, triggering microvascular immunothrombosis and causing microcirculatory disturbance. Meanwhile, they promote macrophage infiltration, aggravating cardiac inflammation (3). Positive-feedback loop: Mitochondrial damage leads to cardiomyocyte apoptosis and the release of DAMPs, while microthrombosis exacerbates ischemia. These events, in turn, reactivate the upstream NETosis pathways, establishing a self-sustaining pro-inflammatory cycle that drives the self-perpetuation and deterioration of heart failure. NETs, neutrophil extracellular traps; Ang II, angiotensin II; KLF2, Krüppel-like factor 2; HIF1α, hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha; ADAMTS13, a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13; SLC44A2, solute carrier family 44 member 2; DEL-1, developmental endothelial locus-1; HMGB1, high-mobility group box 1;vWF, von Willebrand factor; NE, neutrophil elastase; PGC-1α; TLR, Toll-like receptor. Image created with Figdraw.com, with permission.

NETs in vascular diseases

As well as cardiac diseases, NETs also contribute substantially to vascular pathologies. Building on the general cellular mechanisms linking inflammation, thrombosis and fibrosis aforementioned, this section examines the disease-specific roles of NETs in atherosclerosis (AS), abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), hypertension and aortic valve stenosis.

AS

AS is the most common underlying pathology leading to myocardial infarction, stroke and peripheral vascular disease and is fundamentally a lipid-driven chronic inflammatory disease affecting the intima of large- and medium-sized arteries (98). In 2012, Megens et al (99) first directly visualized NET deposition in human and murine AS lesions. Subsequent studies have shown that serum NET levels in patients with coronary artery disease are positively correlated with the severity of coronary stenosis (100). Evidence accumulated in recent years indicates that the mechanisms through which NETs contribute to AS can be organized into three stages: NETosis induction, impaired NET clearance and downstream effector activity (Fig. 4).

The 'trigger-clearance-effector'
mechanism by which NETs drive the progression of atherosclerosis.
i) Trigger: Low shear stress downregulates Piezo1 and upregulates
HDAC2, thereby promoting NOX-dependent ROS generation; oxLDL
induces NETosis via exosomal miR-146a/miR-505 and the CFTR/SGK1
pathway; and aging-related mitochondrial oxidative stress further
enhances NET release. ii) Clearance: Hypercholesterolemia,
endoplasmic reticulum stress (PERK-ATF4) in plaque macrophages and
diabetes synergistically suppress DNase I/DNase1L3-mediated NET
degradation, resulting in persistent NET accumulation within
plaques. iii) Effector: NETs enhance macrophage oxLDL uptake and
MMP-9 expression, impair efferocytosis through
HMGB1/TLR4/ADAM17-mediated MerTK cleavage and expand the necrotic
core; NE cleaves TLR4 to drive VSMC proliferation and migration;
histone H2A captures monocytes; and CitH3 activates the NLRP3
inflammasome, collectively exacerbating plaque inflammation and
instability. NETs, neutrophil extracellular traps; HDAC2, histone
deacetylase 2; NOX, NADPH oxidase; ROS, reactive oxygen species;
ox-LDL, oxidized low-density lipoprotein; miR. micro RNA; CFTR,
cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator; SGK1, serum
and glucocorticoid inducible protein kinase 1; MMP, matrix
metalloproteinase; HMGB1, high-mobility group box 1; TLR, Toll-like
receptor; NE, neutrophil elastase; CitH3, citrullinated histone H3;
LSS, low shear stress; DNase, deoxyribonuclease; ER, endoplasmic
reticulum; VSMC, vascular smooth muscle cell; SOD2, histone
deacetylase 2; SIRT3, sirtuin 3; PERK, protein kinase RNA-like
endoplasmic reticulum kinase; ATF4, activating transcription factor
4; ADAM17, a disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing
protein 17; NLRP3, NLR family pyrin domain containing 3; IL,
interleukin; MyD88, myeloid differentiation primary response 88;
IRAK1, interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 1; TRAF6, TNF
receptor-associated factor 6; NF-κB, nuclear factor
kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells. Image created with
Figdraw.com, with permission.

Figure 4

The 'trigger-clearance-effector' mechanism by which NETs drive the progression of atherosclerosis. i) Trigger: Low shear stress downregulates Piezo1 and upregulates HDAC2, thereby promoting NOX-dependent ROS generation; oxLDL induces NETosis via exosomal miR-146a/miR-505 and the CFTR/SGK1 pathway; and aging-related mitochondrial oxidative stress further enhances NET release. ii) Clearance: Hypercholesterolemia, endoplasmic reticulum stress (PERK-ATF4) in plaque macrophages and diabetes synergistically suppress DNase I/DNase1L3-mediated NET degradation, resulting in persistent NET accumulation within plaques. iii) Effector: NETs enhance macrophage oxLDL uptake and MMP-9 expression, impair efferocytosis through HMGB1/TLR4/ADAM17-mediated MerTK cleavage and expand the necrotic core; NE cleaves TLR4 to drive VSMC proliferation and migration; histone H2A captures monocytes; and CitH3 activates the NLRP3 inflammasome, collectively exacerbating plaque inflammation and instability. NETs, neutrophil extracellular traps; HDAC2, histone deacetylase 2; NOX, NADPH oxidase; ROS, reactive oxygen species; ox-LDL, oxidized low-density lipoprotein; miR. micro RNA; CFTR, cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator; SGK1, serum and glucocorticoid inducible protein kinase 1; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; HMGB1, high-mobility group box 1; TLR, Toll-like receptor; NE, neutrophil elastase; CitH3, citrullinated histone H3; LSS, low shear stress; DNase, deoxyribonuclease; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; VSMC, vascular smooth muscle cell; SOD2, histone deacetylase 2; SIRT3, sirtuin 3; PERK, protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase; ATF4, activating transcription factor 4; ADAM17, a disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17; NLRP3, NLR family pyrin domain containing 3; IL, interleukin; MyD88, myeloid differentiation primary response 88; IRAK1, interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 1; TRAF6, TNF receptor-associated factor 6; NF-κB, nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells. Image created with Figdraw.com, with permission.

The initiating signals for NETosis are highly dependent on the pathological context. At the hemodynamic level, low shear stress at sites such as vascular bifurcations downregulates the mechanosensitive ion channel Piezo1, thereby reducing Ca2+ influx and upregulating histone deacetylase 2. These changes promote NOX-mediated ROS generation and directly induce NETosis (101), helping to explain the predilection of AS for vascular bifurcations. At the metabolic level, oxLDL can induce NETosis through several pathways. First, oxLDL-stimulated macrophages release exosomes enriched in miR-146a that induce NETosis at a distance by targeting and suppressing neutrophil SOD2, resulting in a burst of mitochondrial ROS (102). Second, oxLDL stimulates vascular endothelial cells to secrete exosomes enriched in miR-505. Following uptake by neutrophils, these exosomes target and suppress the mitochondrial deacetylase SIRT3, causing a burst of mitochondrial ROS and NET release (103). Finally, oxLDL downregulates the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator in neutrophils, increasing intracellular Cl− concentrations and activating the serum and glucocorticoid inducible protein kinase 1 (SGK1)-ROS pathway to promote NETosis (104). Aging represents another important contributing factor. Myeloid cells from aged mice exhibit markedly greater mitochondrial oxidative stress (mitoOS) and 7-ketocholesterol induces NET release more potently in aged neutrophils, whereas mitoOS scavenging effectively inhibits this process (105). Thus, NETosis in AS arises from the convergence of mechanical, metabolic and age-related stimuli.

The pathological effects of NETs depend not only on their rate of formation but, more importantly, on the efficiency of their clearance. Under homeostatic conditions, deoxyribonuclease (DNase) I and DNase1L3 rapidly degrade NETs and restore homeostasis. However, AS-associated metabolic abnormalities can severely impair this clearance system. Hypercholesterolemia systemically suppresses the NET-induced DNase feedback response. In ApoE−/− mice, severe hypercholesterolemia impairs the secretory responses of hepatic DNase I and intestinal DNase1L3, delaying NET clearance and preventing the resolution of inflammation (106). Within plaques, macrophages are the principal source of DNase. However, lipid loading-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress activates the PERK-ATF4 signaling axis, which markedly inhibits macrophage DNase secretion and promotes persistent NET accumulation (107). Diabetes further aggravates this clearance defect. In STZ-induced diabetic Ldlr−/− mice, NETs persist within plaques and fail to regress spontaneously following lipid lowering, unlike those in nondiabetic mice, thereby sustaining the inflammatory microenvironment (108). Importantly, these clearance defects do not occur in isolation. Hypercholesterolemia frequently coexists with diabetes and advanced age and their synergistic effects can lead to widespread disruption of the NET clearance system.

Once NETs persist within plaques, they disrupt the functions of multiple cell types and establish a self-reinforcing pathological cycle. Their effects on macrophages are multifaceted. NETs directly increase macrophage uptake of oxLDL and promote MMP-9 expression and secretion, thereby exacerbating plaque instability (39). A recent study has further shown that NET-associated HMGB1 activates ADAM17 through TLR4. ADAM17 then cleaves the efferocytosis receptor MerTK on the macrophage surface, impairing apoptotic-cell clearance and consequently promoting expansion of the necrotic core (107). In vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), NE cleaves TLR4 and activates the downstream MyD88-IRAK1-TRAF6-NF-κB pathway, promoting VSMC proliferation, migration and inflammatory cytokine release. These effects drive neointimal hyperplasia and contribute to plaque inflammation, growth and instability (109). In infection-associated AS, cationic histone H2A on the NET surface captures negatively charged monocytes through receptor-independent electrostatic attraction, facilitating their infiltration into plaques and markedly accelerating plaque progression (110). In foam cells, NET-associated CitH3 directly binds to and activates the NLRP3 inflammasome, promoting IL-1β and IL-18 release (111). Collectively, these findings demonstrate that NETs affect virtually all major cell types within plaques through diverse molecular mechanisms.

Overall, NET-driven AS can be conceptualized as a systemic pathological process involving multisource induction, multistep failure of clearance and multicellular effector activity. However, most existing studies rely on endpoint analyses and the specific contributions of NETs to plaque initiation, progression, regression and rupture have not been longitudinally characterized. Furthermore, the functional differences among NETs induced by distinct stimuli have not been systematically compared. LSS-induced NETosis may primarily determine lesion localization, whereas metabolic and aging-related factors may be more important in sustaining plaque progression. Defining these spatiotemporal regulatory differences will be essential for developing stage-specific NET-targeted interventions.

Hypertension

Hypertension is one of the most common chronic diseases and is characterized by persistently elevated arterial blood pressure. Its pathogenesis involves inflammation-driven oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, VSMC phenotypic switching and ECM remodeling (6). Serum levels of the NET markers cfDNA and MPO are markedly elevated in patients with hypertension (112), whereas the Ang II-induced increase in blood pressure is markedly attenuated in NET-deficient mice (113), providing functional evidence for the involvement of NETs in hypertension.

Studies have delineated a pathogenic cascade extending from upstream stimuli and NET release to downstream effects and target-organ damage. Under hypertensive conditions, vascular mechanical stretch and neurohumoral activation constitute the two principal triggers of NETosis. Krishnan et al (113) demonstrated that cyclic mechanical stretch of the vessel wall activates the mechanosensitive calcium channel TRPV4 on the neutrophil membrane, triggering calcium influx and robust NET release. A stretch magnitude of 10%, simulating hypertension, induced markedly greater NETosis than 5% stretch, which simulated normotension. Concurrently, Chrysanthopoulou et al (114) showed that Ang II directly induces NET formation through the AT1 receptor in a process requiring NOX-derived ROS production, autophagy activation and PAD4-mediated histone citrullination. These pathways do not operate independently but converge on ROS as a common mediator. In addition to causing direct cellular damage, ROS generate isolevuglandins (isoLGs). IsoLGs covalently modify lysine residues in histones and disrupt higher-order nucleosome structures, thereby promoting chromatin decondensation and providing the structural basis for NET release (115).

Following NET release, NET-associated histones, particularly CitH3 and TF increase blood pressure through two distinct mechanisms: Vascular functional dysregulation and structural remodeling. At the functional level, CitH3 directly activates endothelial cells, upregulates adhesion molecules such as ICAM-1, VCAM-1 and E-selectin and impairs acetylcholine-induced endothelium-dependent vasodilation (113). At the vascular structural level, Fang et al (116) showed that NETs activate PI3K-Akt signaling in VSMCs, leading to downregulation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor CDKN1b. This relieves G1/S checkpoint arrest and promotes cell-cycle progression. The response is accompanied by marked upregulation of thymidine kinase 1 (TK1), a rate-limiting enzyme in DNA synthesis that directly promotes VSMC proliferation. Moreover, NET-stimulated VSMCs can transmit proliferative signals horizontally to neighboring VSMCs not directly exposed to NETs by releasing TK1-containing exosomes, thereby extending the spatial range of vascular remodeling (116).

The pathological effects of NETs ultimately converge on fibrosis and functional decompensation in hypertensive target organs. At the cardiac level, Tu et al (117) first linked NETs to ferroptosis, demonstrating that NETs activate NF-κB signaling, upregulate the pro-ferroptotic protein ACSL4 and simultaneously downregulate ferritin heavy chain FTH1 and the antioxidant enzyme GPX4. These changes induce iron-dependent lipid peroxidation and ferroptotic cardiomyocyte death. This process not only directly promotes cardiomyocyte loss but also upregulates pro-fibrotic markers, including α-smooth muscle actin, fibronectin and collagen II, through pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic signaling, thereby driving myocardial interstitial fibrosis and cardiac dysfunction.

AAA

AAA is a degenerative vascular disease characterized by chronic vessel-wall inflammation, ECM degradation and disrupted vascular smooth muscle cell homeostasis (118). Multiple clinical studies have shown that circulating and aortic tissue levels of NET-specific markers, including CitH3, cell-free DNA, nucleosomes, MPO and NE, are markedly higher in patients with AAA than in healthy controls. The concentrations of these markers are positively correlated with aneurysm diameter, expansion rate and rupture risk, suggesting that NET burden may reflect AAA severity and adverse prognosis (119,120).

NET formation is tightly regulated by upstream signaling mechanisms. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase γ promotes noncanonical pyroptosis, specifically activation of the caspase-11/GSDMD pathway, through cAMP/PKA signaling, thereby enhancing NET release and aggravating AAA (121). Studies have identified another important upstream mechanism involving the gut microbiota. Patients with AAA exhibit marked gut dysbiosis characterized by a reduced abundance of the butyrate-producing bacterium Roseburia intestinalis and a concomitant decrease in butyrate levels (122). Reduced butyrate availability diminishes its inhibitory effect on neutrophil NOX2 expression, resulting in excessive NET release. Supplementation with R. intestinalis or butyrate markedly reduces neutrophil infiltration and NET deposition in the aortic wall and attenuates AAA progression (122). These findings link the gut microbiota-metabolite axis to NET formation and provide a rationale for microbiota-targeted interventions in AAA.

NETs promote AAA formation and progression through multiple convergent mechanisms. First, NETs directly induce ferroptosis, a form of programmed cell death driven by iron-dependent lipid peroxidation, in VSMCs. NETs inhibit PI3K/AKT signaling in VSMCs, downregulating SLC7A11 and GPX4 while upregulating ACSL4 and TFR1, thereby triggering lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis (123). Additionally, NETs also destabilize the dimeric form of the mitochondrial glutathione transporter SLC25A11, leading to mitochondrial glutathione (mitoGSH) depletion and further inducing ferroptosis in SMCs (124). Second, NETs suppress Hippo signaling through TLR9, thereby increasing YAP nuclear translocation and driving VSMC phenotypic switching from a contractile state to a synthetic and pro-inflammatory phenotype. This transition is characterized by downregulation of contractile marker genes, including ACTA2, MYH11 and CNN1 and upregulation of pro-inflammatory and matrix metalloproteinase genes, including MMP2, MMP9, IL-1β and TNF-α, thereby exacerbating arterial-wall inflammation and matrix degradation (125). Third, NETs activate p38/JNK signaling and induce VSMC apoptosis, aggravating medial VSMC depletion and elastic fiber fragmentation and promoting AAA rupture (126). Furthermore, the DNA component of NETs forms complexes with cathelicidin-related antimicrobial peptide (CRAMP/LL-37), which recruit and activate plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs), induce robust type I interferon production and subsequently activate T cells to amplify the inflammatory cascade within the aortic wall (127).

In summary, NETs act through multiple mechanisms to drive AAA formation and progression, including the induction of SMC ferroptosis, phenotypic switching and apoptosis and the activation of pDC-mediated immune amplification. Potential therapeutic approaches therefore include inhibiting upstream NET formation, modulating gut microbial metabolites to reduce NET generation and targeting downstream effector mechanisms, such as ferroptosis, YAP signaling and pDC activation. These strategies may have translational potential for the treatment of AAA.

Aortic valve stenosis

Aortic valve stenosis is the most common valvular heart disease, with a prevalence exceeding 2% among individuals older than 60 years and a two-year mortality rate of ~50% among those with severe stenosis (128). The disease is primarily driven by progressive inflammatory and fibrocalcific processes involving interactions among circulating inflammatory mediators, valvular endothelial cells and valvular interstitial cells (129,130).

At the tissue level, abundant NET-specific markers, including CitH3 and cfDNA, have been detected in human stenotic aortic valve tissue (131,132), confirming the presence of NETs in valvular pathology. oxLDL is considered an important mediator of inflammation in aortic valve stenosis (133) and Awasthi et al (134) further showed that oxLDL induces NET formation through the TLR-PKC-IRAK-MAPK pathway and NADPH oxidase activation, establishing a molecular basis for the functional relationship between oxLDL and NETs. Building on these observations, evidence increasingly implicates NF-κB as a key downstream effector of NETs. NF-κB is a well-established pro-inflammatory signaling hub and contributes to the calcification associated with aortic valve stenosis (135). As NETs can activate NF-κB through multiple pathways, the present study proposed that NETs within stenotic aortic valves may convert the initial inflammatory signal induced by oxLDL into an osteogenic differentiation program in valvular interstitial cells through NF-κB signaling. NETs may simultaneously promote ECM remodeling through NET-associated elastase and cathepsins, thereby providing a collagen scaffold for calcific nodule formation. However, this hypothesis currently lacks direct functional validation. No studies have yet used NET inhibitors or PAD4-deficient animals in aortic valve stenosis models to evaluate changes in valvular NF-κB activity, calcification markers and valve function.

Potential NETs-targeted therapeutic strategies in cardiovascular disease

Given the central role of NETs in cardiovascular disease, therapeutic targeting of NETs has attracted increasing attention. Investigated approaches span multiple intervention points, including inhibition of upstream NETosis signaling, enzymatic degradation of preformed NETs and neutralization of downstream NET components. This section categorizes current NET-targeted interventions according to their mechanisms of action and evaluates the available preclinical evidence, clinical translational status and inherent limitations (Table I).

Table I

Therapeutic interventions targeting NETs.

Table I

Therapeutic interventions targeting NETs.

Authors, yearIntervention strategyTargetCompoundMechanismModelKey therapeutic outcomesEvidence levelTranslational statusKey limitations(Refs.)
Mangold et al, 2022NETs degradationNETs-DNA backboneDNase-IEnzymatic cleavage of DNA matrix. ApoE−/− mouse model of atherosclerosis (high-fat diet).Reduced atherosclerotic plaque size by ~3-fold; decreased plasma IL-1β and IL-6 levels.Preclinical (in vivo).Approved (Cystic fibrosis).(1) Releases toxic histones; (2) Inactivated by plasma G-actin; (3) Poor lesion specificity.(73)
Morita et al, 2004Targeting NETs componentsNETs-DNA backboneTREX1Intracellular degradation of internalized NETs via TREX1 (DNase III) in macrophages; DNase 1L3 mediates extracellular NET degradation in DCs.Primary human monocyte-derived macrophages (HMDMs) and dendritic cells (MDDCs); NETs from primary human neutrophils.TREX1 silencing led to accumulation of undigested NETs in macrophages; DC-secreted DNase1L3 degraded NETs extracellularly.Preclinical (in vivo).Preclinical (Theoretical target).No pharmacological agonist available; pure theoretical target.(141)
Iba et al, 2015; Wildhagen et al, 2014Histone neutralizationHistones Unfractionated/LMWH/Non-anticoagulant heparinCharge-dependent electrostatic binding to neutralize histone cytotoxicity.Mouse (C57BL/6) models of ConA-induced hepatitis, CLP and LPS challenge; Rat (Wistar) models of histone H3-induced organ injury; EA.hy926 cells and primary endothelial/leukocytes.Attenuates histone-mediated cytotoxicity and organ damage.Preclinical (in vivo).Approved (Anticoagulant, repurposing).The effective dose is far beyond the anticoagulation threshold; broad charge effects; poor tissue penetration; stimulus-specific efficacy.(142, 143)
Osada et al, 2017TM alfaPromotes APC generation to proteolytically degrade histones.EA.hy926 endothelial cells.Reduces histone-induced thrombin generation and endothelial death.In vitro.Approved (DIC).Limited cardiovascular-specific data.(145)
Abrams et al, 2013CRPBinds directly to histones, blocking their integration into cell membranes and subsequent Ca2+ influx; competes with phospholipids for histone binding.Mouse models; EA.hy926 cells; Serum from trauma/sepsis patients.Reduces histone-mediated endothelial injury.Preclinical and Ex vivo (Patient serum).Biomarker/Drug candidate.CRP has context-dependent pro-/anti-inflammatory effects.(146)
Li et al, 2025Neutrophil elastase inhibitionNESivelestatSelective NE inhibitionLPS-induced sepsis mouse; MI/R modelsPreserves endothelial glycocalyx; reduces myocardial injuryPreclinical (in vivo).Approved (ARDS)Protease redundancy may (PR3, CatG, MMPs) compensate; PK challenges.(147)
Bidouard et al, 2003SSR69071NE inhibitionRabbit coronary ischemia-reperfusion modelReduces infarct areaPreclinical (in vivo).PreclinicalIntravenous delivery required; limited cardiovascular data.(149)
Delbosc et al, 2016Inhibition of NETosisAZD9668NE inhibitionElastase-induced AAA rat model (with P. gingivalis enhancement)Suppressed Pg-enhanced AAA diameter growth; promoted healing process (smooth muscle cell colonization and collagen deposition) within the intraluminal thrombus; reduced calcification, MPO and cell-free DNA release.Preclinical (in vivo).Phase II (Respiratory diseases)Repurposing potential but cardiovascular trials lacking.(150)
Knight et al, 2014PAD4 inhibitionPAD4Cl-amidineIrreversible pan-PAD inhibition ApoE−/− mouse carotid thrombosis; AS modelsReduces NETosis, atherosclerosis and arterial thrombosisPreclinical (in vivo).Preclinical (Tool compound)Narrow therapeutic time window; interferes with physiological NETosis; no reliable pharmacodynamic biomarker.(151)
Du et al, 2020GSK484Reversible selective PAD4 inhibitionMouse MI model (LAD ligation)Reduces infarct size, neutrophil infiltration, CitH3 expression and cardiomyocyte apoptosisPreclinical (in vivo).PreclinicalSame as aforementioned; optimal dosing window undefined.(153)
Heger et al, 2023JBI-589Oral selective PAD4 inhibitionCollagen-induced arthritis (DBA/1J mice)Preserves LV diastolic function; reduces CitH3 and thrombotic inflammationPreclinical (in vivo).PreclinicalLong-term safety unknown; cardiovascular data limited.(154)
Li et al, 2024ROS inhibitionNADPH oxidase/ROSColchicineInhibits ROS production and Ca2+ influx; suppresses NETosisMouse model of permanent LAD ligation-induced AMI.Improves cardiac function and remodeling; reduces post-AMI inflammationPreclinical (in vivo).Approved (CVDs: CAD and post-MI),NETs-specific benefit not demonstrated in clinical trials; anti-NETs effect inferred(155)
Shirakawa et al, 2022HOCl (hypochlorous acid)/Hydroxyl radicals (•OH)H2Neutralizes HOCl produced during oxidative burst, reducing DNA damage (γ-H2AX); suppresses CXCR4+ aged neutrophil subset and neutrophil aggregation; may also inhibit PAD4 activity in NOX-independent NETosis.Scavenges hydroxyl radicals and HOCl; suppresses ROS.Inhibits PMA-induced NETosis; reduces DNA damage in neutrophilsPreclinical (in vivo).Medical gas. Molecular target unclear; no direct CVDs patient evidence(157)
Khan et al, 2019Others Indirect inhibition via inflammation/metabolismDNA/Chromatin (intercalation)Anthracyclines (e.g., doxorubicin, daunorubicin)Intercalates into DNA, blocking chromatin decondensation and transcriptional firing; inhibits both Nox-dependent and Nox-independent NETosis without affecting ROS production or inducing apoptosis.Primary human neutrophils.Dose-dependent NETosis inhibitionIn vitro.Approved (Chemotherapy)Intrinsic cardiotoxicity prevents repurposing; requires cardio-safe derivatives.(158)
Kindberg et al, 2024Cytokine targetingIL-6 receptorTocilizumabReduces circulating NET markers (dsDNA, MPO-DNA, H3Cit) in STEMI patients; mechanism may involve downregulation of NETosis-related genes (histones, HDAC) and reduced neutrophil mobilization; exact mechanism remains unclear.STEMI patients (ASSAIL-MI trial).Reduced NET markers at 24h and 3-7 days; NET reduction partially mediated tocilizumab's beneficial effect on myocardial salvage index (MSI); higher NET levels associated with larger infarct size and more microvascular obstruction.Clinical.Approved (Rheumatoid arthritis, CRS).Mechanism of NETs inhibition unclear; lacks robust cardiovascular outcome data.(159)
Awasthi et al, 2019Immunometabolic InterventionLactate dehydrogenasesodium oxamate dehydrogenase,Inhibits lactate LPS-induced reducing lactate accumulation; lactate itself acts as a signaling molecule promoting NETosis via Warburg effect (PKM2 dimerization).Mouse model of formation. sepsis (C57BL/6, 10 mg/kg LPS, i.p.); primary human polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs).Suppresses NET (in vivo).PreclinicalPreclinical. may disrupt cardiacBroad LDH inhibition lactate metabolism; off-target risks unassessed.(160)
Burczyk et al, 2022Hif-1α/Nrf2 pathway4-OIDownregulates Hif-1α; upregulates Nrf2/HO-1 pathway.Bone marrow neutrophils (C57BL/6J).Suppresses LPS-induced NETosis with minimal effect on basal metabolism.In vitro.Preclinical.Non-specific alkylation of metabolic enzymes (e.g., GAPDH); long-term cardiac effects unknown.(161)

[i] AAA, abdominal aortic aneurysm; AMI, acute myocardial infarction; APC, activated protein C; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; AS, atherosclerosis; CAD, coronary artery disease; CatG, cathepsin G; CitH3, citrullinated histone H3; CLP, cecal ligation and puncture; ConA, concanavalin A; CRP, C-reactive protein; CRS, cytokine release syndrome; CVDs, cardiovascular diseases; CXCR4, C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4; DCs, dendritic cells; DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation; DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid; DNase-I, deoxyribonuclease I; DNase1L3, deoxyribonuclease 1-like 3; dsDNA, double-stranded DNA; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; γ-H2AX, gamma-H2AX (H2A histone family member X); HDAC, histone deacetylase; Hif-1α, hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha; HMDMs, human monocyte-derived macrophages; HO-1, heme oxygenase-1; HOCl, hypochlorous acid; IL, interleukin; i.p., intraperitoneal; LAD, left anterior descending (artery); LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; LMWH, low molecular weight heparin; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; LV, left ventricular; MDDCs, monocyte-derived dendritic cells; MI, myocardial infarction; MI/R, myocardial ischemia/reperfusion; MMPs, matrix metalloproteinases; MPO, myeloperoxidase; MSI, myocardial salvage index; NADPH, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; NE, neutrophil elastase; NETs, neutrophil extracellular traps; NOX, NADPH oxidase; Nrf2, nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2; PAD4, peptidyl arginine deiminase 4; Pg, Porphyromonas gingivalis; PK, pharmacokinetics; PKM2, pyruvate kinase M2; PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate; PMNs, polymorphonuclear neutrophils; PR3, proteinase 3; ROS, reactive oxygen species; STEMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction; TM, thrombomodulin; TREX1, three prime repair exonuclease 1.

NETs degradation strategies

DNA forms the structural backbone of NETs, making enzymatic degradation the most direct approach for dismantling preformed NET structures.

DNase I is the most extensively investigated enzyme for NET degradation. Across multiple cardiovascular disease models, DNase I attenuates NET-mediated pathological changes. For example, in myocardial infarction models, DNase I dissolves NET-rich microthrombi, thereby improving microvascular perfusion and reducing infarct size (73). Recombinant human DNase I is clinically approved for cystic fibrosis, in which it reduces sputum viscosity when administered by aerosol inhalation, bronchoscopic instillation, or other routes (136,137). However, no relevant clinical studies have evaluated DNase I in cardiovascular disease and its translation to cardiovascular indications faces several challenges. First, NETs consist of a DNA backbone decorated with histones and granular proteins. DNase I cleaves DNA but does not neutralize histones. DNA degradation may therefore release substantial quantities of positively charged histones into the circulation. Extracellular histones are highly cytotoxic and can directly damage endothelial cells, activate platelets, promote microthrombus formation and trigger further sterile inflammation (138). Second, blood contains G-actin, a high-affinity inhibitor of DNase I. Plasma G-actin concentrations are sufficient to eliminate most of the activity of administered DNase I within minutes. Although modified DNase I variants, including actin-resistant mutants, are under investigation, none have entered cardiovascular clinical trials (139). Third, NETs in cardiovascular disease are predominantly localized within vascular-wall plaques, thrombi and the microcirculation. Neither intravenous nor intra-arterial administration achieves efficient lesion-specific accumulation of DNase I. Instead, DNase I nonspecifically degrades circulating NET structures, potentially disrupting the physiological roles of NETs in host defense and vascular homeostasis. Consequently, the translational potential of DNase I monotherapy in cardiovascular disease remains limited. Potential strategies for overcoming these limitations include combining DNase I with histone-neutralizing agents, developing actin-resistant DNase I variants and using nanocarriers for lesion-targeted delivery.

Other nucleases, including three-prime repair exonuclease 1 (TREX1), contribute to the physiological clearance of NETs by macrophages (140). TREX1-deficient mice develop inflammatory myocarditis that gradually progresses to dilated cardiomyopathy and circulatory failure, possibly because of impaired NET degradation (141). However, the therapeutic potential of pharmacologically enhancing TREX1 activity remains unexplored and is currently theoretical.

Targeting NETs components
Histone neutralization

Histones are the most abundant protein components of NETs and exert direct cytotoxic effects on endothelial cells, cardiomyocytes and other cell types (138). Several strategies have therefore been developed to sequester or neutralize extracellular histones.

Unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin and their non-anticoagulant derivatives neutralize histones through electrostatic interactions mediated by their negative charge, thereby mitigating cytotoxicity and organ injury. However, the effective doses required substantially exceed those used for clinical anticoagulation, representing a major barrier to clinical translation (142,143). Although non-anticoagulant heparin derivatives may reduce bleeding risk, their efficacy in bacterial sepsis is markedly lower than that in sterile inflammation, suggesting that stimulus-dependent activity limits their generalizability. Moreover, the broad, charge-based binding of heparin may interfere with host-defense peptides, whereas its macromolecular structure limits penetration into the vessel wall and the neutralization of tissue-bound histones. Heparin also does not target other harmful NET components, including the DNA backbone and elastase (144). Targeting histones alone may carry the additional immunological risk of suppressing beneficial DAMP signaling and the therapeutic window appears narrow: Prophylactic administration is effective, whereas delayed treatment provides minimal benefit. Thus, heparin-based histone neutralization alone has limited translational potential. Further development should focus on histone-specific antibodies, tissue-penetrant small-molecule inhibitors and biomarker-guided patient stratification according to the underlying inflammatory stimulus.

Thrombomodulin alpha promotes the generation of activated protein C (APC), which proteolytically degrades extracellular histones and attenuates histone-induced toxicity (145). This mechanism may contribute to the protective effects of thrombomodulin signaling in sepsis-associated organ injury, although cardiovascular-specific evidence remains limited.

C-reactive protein (CRP) can form complexes with histones, preventing their incorporation into cell membranes and reducing histone-induced calcium influx and cellular injury (146). However, CRP has both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory properties and its net effect on NET-mediated pathology remains context-dependent.

NE inhibitors

NE is a key mediator of NET formation and a major effector of NET-mediated tissue injury. Sivelestat is a selective NE inhibitor used clinically to treat acute respiratory distress syndrome (147). Preclinical studies have demonstrated that sivelestat protects against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury and preserves endothelial glycocalyx integrity (148). However, large-scale clinical trials in cardiovascular disease remain lacking. Second-generation NE inhibitors, including SSR69071 and AZD9668, have shown efficacy in preclinical models of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury and AAA (149,150). Their clinical development has been constrained by pharmacokinetic limitations and the need for intravenous administration.

A major limitation of NE inhibition is functional redundancy. NETs contain multiple proteases, including proteinase 3, cathepsin G and MMPs, that may compensate for NE blockade and thereby limit the efficacy of single-target therapy.

Inhibition of NETosis
PAD4 inhibitors

PAD4-mediated histone citrullination is a key step in chromatin decondensation during NETosis, making PAD4 a major therapeutic target. Cl-amidine is a first-generation broad-spectrum PAD inhibitor. It has been extensively used in cardiovascular animal models, including models of AS and myocardial infarction, to suppress NET formation and attenuate tissue injury (151). It is also widely used as a reference compound for investigating the PAD4-NET pathway (152). GSK484 is a more selective PAD4 inhibitor that reduces neutrophil infiltration, inflammatory cytokine release and NET formation and attenuates cardiomyocyte apoptosis in myocardial infarction models (153). JBI-589 is another selective, orally bioavailable PAD4 inhibitor that reduces myocardial NET deposition and pro-fibrotic cytokine levels (154).

The principal translational challenge facing PAD4 inhibitors is uncertainty regarding the therapeutic window. NETs are not uniformly detrimental throughout the course of cardiovascular disease. Inhibition of excessive NETosis is particularly important during the early phase of AMI-associated ischemia-reperfusion injury, spanning hours to days. During later stages of infarct healing, however, moderate NET levels may contribute to necrotic tissue clearance and repair. Current evidence does not permit precise determination of the optimal timing or duration of PAD4 inhibition during cardiovascular events and pharmacodynamic biomarkers to guide treatment duration are lacking. Furthermore, long-term systemic PAD4 inhibition may compromise physiological NETosis-mediated host defense. Future clinical trials could consider circulating CitH3 as a surrogate endpoint when designing time-sequenced dosing regimens.

ROS inhibitors

Given the central role of ROS in classical NETosis, targeting oxidative stress represents another potential therapeutic strategy. Colchicine, a widely used anti-inflammatory drug, has been mechanistically shown to reduce NADPH oxidase-derived ROS production and calcium influx, thereby inhibiting NET formation (155). Supported by evidence from landmark randomized controlled trials, including COLCOT and LoDoCo2, low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg/day) administered as an adjunct to standard therapy markedly reduces the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with chronic coronary artery disease and those with AMI, with an overall favorable tolerability profile (156). Colchicine is therefore the only NET-related anti-inflammatory drug to date with clinical evidence of cardiovascular benefit, providing proof of principle for the clinical feasibility of NET-targeted strategies. However, clinical trials have not established that its cardiovascular benefits are attributable to NET inhibition.

Molecular hydrogen (H2) is a safe antioxidant that inhibits PMA-induced NET formation by reducing ROS levels (157). However, its precise molecular targets in neutrophils remain unclear and direct evidence of NET inhibition in patients with cardiovascular disease is lacking.

Others

Anthracyclines, including doxorubicin and epirubicin, are widely used chemotherapeutic agents that inhibit NETosis while preserving ROS production and neutrophil viability (158). However, their inherent cardiotoxicity precludes their repurposing for cardiovascular indications. The cardioprotective agent dexrazoxane does not interfere with anthracycline-mediated NET inhibition, suggesting that the anti-NET and cardiotoxic effects of anthracyclines may be separable (158). Future studies could integrate high-resolution mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography to characterize the atomic-level interactions of doxorubicin with two key molecular targets: Topoisomerase IIβ, which mediates cardiotoxicity and the as-yet-unidentified target responsible for NET inhibition. Comparing their molecular interaction fingerprints may identify a toxicophore that is essential for cardiotoxicity but dispensable for NET inhibition. Structure-based drug design using bioisosteric replacement, the introduction of metabolic soft spots, or steric modifications could then selectively eliminate this toxicophore and potentially yield a first generation of anthracycline-derived NET inhibitors with reduced cardiotoxicity.

Indirect inhibition of NETs via inflammatory and metabolic pathways
Cytokine-targeted therapy

Tocilizumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting the IL-6 receptor. In a clinical study, tocilizumab reduced circulating levels of NET markers, including CitH3 and dsDNA, in patients with STEMI and attenuated myocardial injury (159). However, the mechanism underlying this effect remains unexplored. More robust clinical evidence and mechanistic studies are therefore required before tocilizumab can be considered a NET-targeted therapy for cardiovascular disease.

Immunometabolic interventions

Metabolic pathways are increasingly recognized as important regulators of NET formation. Glycolysis plays a central role in both NOX-dependent and NOX-independent NETosis. The lactate dehydrogenase inhibitor sodium oxamate reduces LPS-induced NET formation and lactate accumulation, highlighting the importance of glycolytic metabolism in NETosis (160). Furthermore, 4-octyl itaconate (4-OI), a cell-permeable derivative of the immunometabolite itaconate, markedly inhibits LPS-induced NET formation by downregulating HIF-1α and, in part, through the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway (161). These findings identify 4-OI as an emerging immunometabolic modulator with NET-targeting potential.

Although sodium oxamate and 4-OI reduce NET formation in experimental models, their clinical translation raises potential concerns regarding off-target effects. As a broad-spectrum LDH inhibitor, sodium oxamate may disrupt systemic lactate metabolism, including that of the myocardium; however, this possibility has not been evaluated in cardiovascular models. 4-OI can nonspecifically alkylate metabolic enzymes such as GAPDH and its long-term effects on mitochondria-rich tissues, including the myocardium, remain unclear (161). Moreover, no direct evidence is available regarding the effects of either agent on the acid-base balance of the plaque microenvironment. Future studies should prioritize evaluating the metabolic toxicity of these inhibitors in cardiovascular cells and developing targeted delivery strategies to minimize off-target effects.

Conclusion

In summary, the present review synthesized the multidimensional regulatory network of NETs in cardiovascular disease. Initially characterized as antimicrobial defense structures, NETs are now recognized as a central hub connecting inflammation, thrombosis and fibrosis. In major CVDs, including AMI, AF, HF, AS, hypertension and AAA, NETs drive disease initiation and progression through diverse effector mechanisms. These include disrupting mitochondrial function, inducing cellular phenotypic switching, activating the coagulation cascade, releasing matrix-degrading proteases and triggering ferroptosis and pyroptosis. Cardiovascular microenvironmental stimuli, including oxLDL, mechanical stretch, Ang II and DAMPs, interact with regulatory mechanisms such as gut microbiota-associated metabolic dysregulation, cGAS-STING-mediated cytosolic DNA sensing and the S100A8/A9 positive-feedback loop. Together, these factors establish disease-specific networks that initiate and sustain NETosis. Accordingly, NET-targeted strategies now encompass DNase I-mediated degradation, histone neutralization, NE inhibition, blockade of PAD4 and ROS signaling, immunometabolic modulation and cytokine-targeted interventions. Although low-dose colchicine has entered cardiovascular clinical practice, most NET-directed approaches remain limited by the modest efficacy of single-target interventions, poorly defined therapeutic windows, off-target effects and insufficient cardiovascular-specific clinical evidence.

Despite substantial advances, several important questions must be resolved before NET-targeted therapies can be translated into clinical practice. First, NET structure and function are highly heterogeneous. Single-cell multi-omics and spatial proteomics should be used to characterize NET molecular signatures across CVDs, disease stages and tissue regions. Such studies may distinguish pathogenic NET components from relatively benign or reparative signals and provide a molecular basis for selective neutralization. Second, NETosis exerts stage- and context-dependent pathogenic and reparative effects. During the inflammatory clearance and proliferative repair phases of AMI, NETs may perform opposing functions. This duality is even more pronounced in infectious conditions such as IE and VMC, in which indiscriminate NET inhibition may facilitate pathogen dissemination. Future studies should establish conditional animal models that permit temporal control of NETosis, characterize the kinetics of NET formation and degradation and define the transition from global NET clearance to precise temporal regulation. Interventions should also be stratified according to sterile or infectious etiology, with priority given to targets that suppress pathological NET activity without compromising host defense. Third, the release of toxic histones following DNase I-mediated degradation, functional redundancy among NET-associated proteases and the off-target effects of metabolic modulators indicate that single-node interventions may be insufficient because of the diverse activities and compensatory mechanisms of NET components. Multitarget combination strategies, such as DNase I combined with histone-specific antibodies, PAD4 inhibitors combined with SGLT2 inhibitors, or simultaneous inhibition of the upstream S100A8/A9-TLR4 axis and downstream cGAS-STING pathway, may provide synergistic efficacy. Lesion-targeted delivery using nanocarriers, antibody-drug conjugates, or localized perfusion may further reduce the risks of infection and impaired immune surveillance associated with prolonged systemic NETosis inhibition. However, most NET-targeted interventions remain at the preclinical stage and cardiovascular-specific evidence is limited. Clinical trials incorporating NET-specific markers, such as MPO-DNA and CitH3, as pharmacodynamic surrogate endpoints are needed to evaluate the cardiovascular benefits of PAD4 inhibitors, DNase I and immunometabolic modulators and to define dose-biomarker-outcome relationships. Finally, identification of the microbiome-metabolite axis, exemplified by the Roseburia intestinalis-butyrate-NOX2 pathway, has expanded the therapeutic landscape of NET regulation. Integrating AI-assisted multimodal data analysis with pharmacogenetic approaches may enable precision cardiovascular therapy based on individualized NET molecular signatures and risk stratification. Such advances could ultimately translate NETs from mechanistic mediators identified in basic research into clinically actionable therapeutic targets that can be monitored and modulated.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors' contributions

ZW was responsible for writing and revising the manuscript, creating the figures and constructing the table. MC contributed to the figure editing and revision process. WS contributed to the figure editing and revision process. YJ contributed to literature search and study screening. XS contributed to constructing the table. XC contributed to literature search and study screening. YY and JZ offered funding support and played a role in the conception, design, editing and supervision of the manuscript. Data authentication is not applicable. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Funding

The present study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 82574965), the National Natural Science Foundation of China Youth Fund Project (grant no. 82204965) and Traditional Chinese medicine atherosclerosis inheritance and innovation team (grant no. 4042502037).

References

1 

Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risks 2023 Collaborators: Global, Regional, and National Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factorsin 204 Countries and Territories, 1990-2023. J Am Coll Cardiol. 86:2167–2243. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Writing Group Members; Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, Cushman M, Das SR, de Ferranti S, Després JP, et al: Executive summary: Heart disease and stroke statistics-2016 Update: A report from the american heart association. Circulation. 133:447–454. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Caldarelli M, Franza L, Cutrupi S, Menegolo M, Franceschi F, Gasbarrini A, Gambassi G and Cianci R: Inflammasomes in cardiovascular diseases: Current knowledge and future perspectives. Int J Mol Sci. 26:54392025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Borim PA, Gatto M, Mota GAF, Meirelles ALB, Dos Santos ACC, Pagan LU, Ojopi EPB, Rodrigues EA, Souza LM, Damatto FC, et al: Nlrc4 Inflammasome expression after acute myocardial infarction in rats. Int J Mol Sci. 26:36972025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Sun B, Xun Z, Zhou Z, Zhang N, Piao M, Li C, Li J, Li S, Zhang L, Chen X, et al: Single-cell transcriptomic analysis deciphers the inflammatory microenvironment characterized by CXCL9+ fibroblasts and ACKR1+ endothelial cells in immune-related myocarditis. J Transl Med. 23:5552025. View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Aboukhater D, Morad B, Nasrallah N, Nasser SA, Sahebkar A, Kobeissy F, Boudaka A and Eid AH: Inflammation and hypertension: Underlying mechanisms and emerging understandings. J Cell Physiol. 238:1148–1159. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Tezen O, Hayıroğlu Mİ, Pay L, Yumurtaş AÇ, Keskin K, Çetin T, Dereli Ş, Kadığoğlu H, Yücedağ FF, Arter E and Dayı ŞÜ: The role of systemic immune-inflammatory index in predicting contrast-induced nephropathy in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction cases. Biomark Med. 18:937–944. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Hayıroğlu Mİ and Altay S: Overlap between nutritional indices in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A focus on albumin. Balkan Med J. 41:324–325. 2024.

9 

Lian Y, Lai X, Wu C, Wang L, Shang J, Zhang H, Jia S, Xing W and Liu H: The roles of neutrophils in cardiovascular diseases. Front Cardiovasc Med. 12:15261702025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Döring Y, Libby P and Soehnlein O: Neutrophil extracellular traps participate in cardiovascular diseases: Recent experimental and clinical insights. Circ Res. 126:1228–1241. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Brinkmann V, Reichard U, Goosmann C, Fauler B, Uhlemann Y, Weiss DS, Weinrauch Y and Zychlinsky A: Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria. Science. 303:1532–1535. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Dwyer M, Shan Q, D'Ortona S, Maurer R, Mitchell R, Olesen H, Thiel S, Huebner J and Gadjeva M: Cystic fibrosis sputum DNA has NETosis characteristics and neutrophil extracellular trap release is regulated by macrophage migration-inhibitory factor. J Innate Immun. 6:765–779. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Petretto A, Bruschi M, Pratesi F, Croia C, Candiano G, Ghiggeri G and Migliorini P: Neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) induced by different stimuli: A comparative proteomic analysis. PLoS One. 14:e02189462019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Wang H, Kim SJ, Lei Y, Wang S, Wang H, Huang H, Zhang H and Tsung A: Neutrophil extracellular traps in homeostasis and disease. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 9:2352024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Hakkim A, Fuchs TA, Martinez NE, Hess S, Prinz H, Zychlinsky A and Waldmann H: Activation of the Raf-MEK-ERK pathway is required for neutrophil extracellular trap formation. Nat Chem Biol. 7:75–77. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Vorobjeva N, Dagil Y, Pashenkov M, Pinegin B and Chernyak B: Protein kinase C isoforms mediate the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps. Int Immunopharmacol. 114:1094482023. View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Hidalgo A, Libby P, Soehnlein O, Aramburu IV, Papayannopoulos V and Silvestre-Roig C: Neutrophil extracellular traps: From physiology to pathology. Cardiovasc Res. 118:2737–2753. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar :

18 

Vorobjeva NV and Chernyak BV: NETosis: Molecular mechanisms, role in physiology and pathology. Biochemistry (Mosc). 85:1178–1190. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Herre M, Cedervall J, Mackman N and Olsson AK: Neutrophil extracellular traps in the pathology of cancer and other inflammatory diseases. Physiol Rev. 103:277–312. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Liang C, Lian N and Li M: The emerging role of neutrophil extracellular traps in fungal infection. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 12:9008952022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Douda DN, Khan MA, Grasemann H and Palaniyar N: SK3 channel and mitochondrial ROS mediate NADPH oxidaseindependent NETosis induced by calcium influx. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 112:2817–2822. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Warnatsch A, Ioannou M, Wang Q and Papayannopoulos V: Inflammation. Neutrophil extracellular traps license macrophages for cytokine production in atherosclerosis. Science. 349:316–320. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Sorci-Thomas MG and Thomas MJ: Microdomains, inflammation, and atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 118:679–691. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Wang L, Zhou X, Yin Y, Mai Y, Wang D and Zhang X: Hyperglycemia induces neutrophil extracellular traps formation through an NADPH Oxidase-dependent pathway in diabetic retinopathy. Front Immunol. 9:30762019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Kim SW and Lee JK: Role of HMGB1 in the interplay between NETosis and Thrombosis in ischemic stroke: A review. Cells. 9:17942020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

McDonald B, Davis RP, Kim SJ, Tse M, Esmon CT, Kolaczkowska E and Jenne CN: Platelets and neutrophil extracellular traps collaborate to promote intravascular coagulation during sepsis in mice. Blood. 129:1357–1367. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Iba T, Levi M and Levy JH: Intracellular communication and immunothrombosis in sepsis. J Thromb Haemost. 20:2475–2484. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Patel P, Michael JV, Naik UP and McKenzie SE: Platelet FcγRIIA in immunity and thrombosis: Adaptive immunothrombosis. J Thromb Haemost. 19:1149–1160. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Molinaro R, Yu M, Sausen G, Bichsel CA, Corbo C, Folco EJ, Lee GY, Liu Y, Tesmenitsky Y, Shvartz E, et al: Targeted delivery of protein arginine deiminase-4 inhibitors to limit arterial intimal NETosis and preserve endothelial integrity. Cardiovasc Res. 117:2652–2663. 2021.PubMed/NCBI

30 

An Z, Li J, Yu J, Wang X, Gao H, Zhang W, Wei Z, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Zhao J and Liang X: Neutrophil extracellular traps induced by IL-8 aggravate atherosclerosis via activation NF-κB signaling in macrophages. Cell Cycle. 18:2928–2938. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Dabravolski SA, Bukrinsky MI, Utkina AS, Ravani AL, Sukhorukov VN and Orekhov AN: Exploring neutrophil extracellular traps in cardiovascular pathologies: The impact of lipid profiles, PAD4, and radiation. Biocell. 49:931–959. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Ross EA, Devitt A and Johnson JR: Macrophages: The Good, the bad, and the gluttony. Front Immunol. 12:7081862021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Davies LC, Jenkins SJ, Allen JE and Taylor PR: Tissue-resident macrophages. Nat Immunol. 14:986–995. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Wynn TA and Vannella KM: Macrophages in tissue repair, regeneration, and fibrosis. Immunity. 44:450–462. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Yunna C, Mengru H, Lei W and Weidong C: Macrophage M1/M2 polarization. Eur J Pharmacol. 877:1730902020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Tian H, Xiong Y, Zhan J, Lu Z, Zhang Y, Leng Y, Huang Q and Xia Z: Inhibition of Macrophage ARID3A alleviates myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury after heart transplantation by reducing THBS1/CD47 Signaling-mediated neutrophil extracellular traps formation. Adv Sci (Weinh). 12:e099522025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Ye H, Yang Q, Guo H, Wang X, Cheng L, Han B, Hong M, Ma F, Li M, Wu X, et al: Internalisation of neutrophils extracellular traps by macrophages aggravate rheumatoid arthritis via Rab5a. RMD Open. 10:e0038472024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Sano M, Maejima Y, Nakagama S, Shiheido-Watanabe Y, Tamura N, Hirao K, Hirao K, Isobe M and Sasano T: Neutrophil extracellular traps-mediated Beclin-1 suppression aggravates atherosclerosis by inhibiting macrophage autophagy. Front Cell Dev Biol. 10:8761472022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Conforti A, Wahlers T and Paunel-Görgülü A: Neutrophil extracellular traps modulate inflammatory markers and uptake of oxidized LDL by human and murine macrophages. PLoS One. 16:e02598942021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Hofbauer TM, Ondracek AS, Mangold A, Scherz T, Nechvile J, Seidl V, Brostjan C and Lang IM: Neutrophil extracellular traps induce MCP-1 at the culprit site in ST-Segment elevation myocardial infarction. Front Cell Dev Biol. 8:5641692020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Mangold A, Hofbauer TM, Ondracek AS, Artner T, Scherz T, Speidl WS, Krychtiuk KA, Sadushi-Kolici R, Jakowitsch J and Lang IM: Neutrophil extracellular traps and monocyte subsets at the culprit lesion site of myocardial infarction patients. Sci Rep. 9:163042019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Folco EJ, Mawson TL, Vromman A, Bernardes-Souza B, Franck G, Persson O, Nakamura M, Newton G, Luscinskas FW and Libby P: Neutrophil extracellular traps induce endothelial cell activation and tissue factor production through Interleukin-1α and cathepsin G. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 38:1901–1912. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Aldabbous L, Abdul-Salam V, McKinnon T, Duluc L, Pepke-Zaba J, Southwood M, Ainscough AJ, Hadinnapola C, Wilkins MR, Toshner M and Wojciak-Stothard B: Neutrophil extracellular traps promote angiogenesis: Evidence from vascular pathology in pulmonary hypertension. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 36:2078–2087. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

An Y, Geng K, Wang HY, Wan SR, Ma XM, Long Y, Xu Y and Jiang ZZ: Hyperglycemia-induced STING signaling activation leads to aortic endothelial injury in diabetes. Cell Commun Signal. 21:3652023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Mou J, Chen Y, Zhu X, Xu B, Wang M, Xie J, Lin T, Gu Q, Wu Q, Che Z, et al: Emerging role of the cGAS-STING pathway in cardiovascular diseases: Biologic function, mechanisms and targeted therapy. Mol Med. 31:2182025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Zhu S, Yu Y, Qu M, Qiu Z, Zhang H, Miao C and Guo K: Neutrophil extracellular traps contribute to immunothrombosis formation via the STING pathway in sepsis-associated lung injury. Cell Death Discov. 9:3152023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Badimon L and Vilahur G: Thrombosis formation on atherosclerotic lesions and plaque rupture. J Intern Med. 276:618–632. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Etulain J, Martinod K, Wong SL, Cifuni SM, Schattner M and Wagner DD: P-selectin promotes neutrophil extracellular trap formation in mice. Blood. 126:242–246. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

49 

Constantinescu-Bercu A, Grassi L, Frontini M, Salles-Crawley II, Woollard K and Crawley JT: Activated αIIbβ3 on platelets mediates flow-dependent NETosis via SLC44A2. Elife. 9:e533532020. View Article : Google Scholar

50 

Mussbacher M, Salzmann M, Brostjan C, Hoesel B, Schoergenhofer C, Datler H, Hohensinner P, Basílio J, Petzelbauer P, Assinger A and Schmid JA: Cell Type-Specific roles of NF-κB linking inflammation and thrombosis. Front Immunol. 10:852019. View Article : Google Scholar

51 

Su M, Chen C, Li S, Li M, Zeng Z, Zhang Y, Xia L, Li X, Zheng D, Lin Q, et al: Gasdermin D-dependent platelet pyroptosis exacerbates NET formation and inflammation in severe sepsis. Nat Cardiovasc Res. 1:732–747. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

52 

Zhang W, Zhang Y, Han L, Bo T, Qi Z, Zhong H, Xu H, Hu L, Chen S and Zhang S: Double-stranded DNA enhances platelet activation, thrombosis, and myocardial injury via cyclic GMP-AMP synthase. Cardiovasc Res. 121:353–366. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar

53 

Tallquist MD: Cardiac fibroblast diversity. Annu Rev Physiol. 82:63–78. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

54 

Ong CH, Tham CL, Harith HH, Firdaus N and Israf DA: TGF-β-induced fibrosis: A review on the underlying mechanism and potential therapeutic strategies. Eur J Pharmacol. 911:1745102021. View Article : Google Scholar

55 

Schlittler M, Pramstaller PP, Rossini A and De Bortoli M: Myocardial fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A perspective from fibroblasts. Int J Mol Sci. 24:148452023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

56 

Frangogiannis N: Transforming growth factor-β in tissue fibrosis. J Exp Med. 217:e201901032020. View Article : Google Scholar

57 

Kuwahara F, Kai H, Tokuda K, Kai M, Takeshita A, Egashira K and Imaizumi T: Transforming growth factor-beta function blocking prevents myocardial fibrosis and diastolic dysfunction in pressure-overloaded rats. Circulation. 106:130–135. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

58 

Eghbalzadeh K, Georgi L, Louis T, Zhao H, Keser U, Weber C, Mollenhauer M, Conforti A, Wahlers T and Paunel-Görgülü A: Compromised Anti-inflammatory action of neutrophil extracellular traps in PAD4-deficient mice contributes to aggravated acute inflammation after myocardial infarction. Front Immunol. 10:23132019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

59 

He L, Liu R, Yue H, Zhu G, Fu L, Chen H, Guo Y and Qin C: NETs promote pathogenic cardiac fibrosis and participate in ventricular aneurysm formation after ischemia injury through the facilitation of perivascular fibrosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 583:154–161. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

60 

Hara A and Tallquist MD: Fibroblast and immune cell Cross-Talk in cardiac fibrosis. Curr Cardiol Rep. 25:485–493. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

61 

Venkatachalam K, Venkatesan B, Valente AJ, Melby PC, Nandish S, Reusch JE, Clark RA and Chandrasekar B: WISP1, a pro-mitogenic, pro-survival factor, mediates tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha)-stimulated cardiac fibroblast proliferation but inhibits TNF-alpha-induced cardiomyocyte death. J Biol Chem. 284:14414–14427. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

62 

Leicht M, Briest W and Zimmer HG: Regulation of norepinephrine-induced proliferation in cardiac fibroblasts by interleukin-6 and p42/p44 mitogen activated protein kinase. Mol Cell Biochem. 243:65–72. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

63 

Siwik DA, Chang DL and Colucci WS: Interleukin-1beta and tumor necrosis factor-alpha decrease collagen synthesis and increase matrix metalloproteinase activity in cardiac fibroblasts in vitro. Circ Res. 86:1259–1265. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

64 

Mir SA, Chatterjee A, Mitra A, Pathak K, Mahata SK and Sarkar S: Inhibition of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) attenuates interleukin-6 (IL-6)-induced collagen synthesis and resultant hypertrophy in rat heart. J Biol Chem. 287:2666–2677. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

65 

Xu Y, Ren Y, Zou W, Wang M, Ye X and Shen W: Neutrophil extracellular traps aggravate uremic cardiomyopathy by inducing myocardial fibroblast pyroptosis. Sci Rep. 15:175092025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

66 

Akiyama M, Zeisbrich M, Ibrahim N, Ohtsuki S, Berry GJ, Hwang PH, Goronzy JJ and Weyand CM: Neutrophil extracellular traps induce Tissue-invasive monocytes in granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Front Immunol. 10:26172019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

67 

Piera-Velazquez S, Li Z and Jimenez SA: Role of endothelial-mesenchymal transition (EndoMT) in the pathogenesis of fibrotic disorders. Am J Pathol. 179:1074–1080. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

68 

Pieterse E, Rother N, Garsen M, Hofstra JM, Satchell SC, Hoffmann M, Loeven MA, Knaapen HK, van der Heijden OWH, Berden JHM, et al: Neutrophil Extracellular traps drive Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal transition. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 37:1371–1379. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

69 

Fuchs TA, Brill A, Duerschmied D, Schatzberg D, Monestier M, Myers DD Jr, Wrobleski SK, Wakefield TW, Hartwig JH and Wagner DD: Extracellular DNA traps promote thrombosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 107:15880–15885. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

70 

Zhang YS, Davoudi F, Walch P, Manbachi A, Luo X, Dell'Erba V, Miri AK, Albadawi H, Arneri A, Li X, et al: Bioprinted thrombosis-on-a-chip. Lab Chip. 16:4097–4105. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

71 

Borensztajn K, Stiekema J, Nijmeijer S, Reitsma PH, Peppelenbosch MP and Spek CA: Factor Xa stimulates proinflammatory and profibrotic responses in fibroblasts via protease-activated receptor-2 activation. Am J Pathol. 172:309–320. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

72 

Mangold A, Alias S, Scherz T, Hofbauer M, Jakowitsch J, Panzenböck A, Simon D, Laimer D, Bangert C, Kammerlander A, et al: Coronary neutrophil extracellular trap burden and deoxyribonuclease activity in ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome are predictors of ST-segment resolution and infarct size. Circ Res. 116:1182–1192. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

73 

Mangold A, Ondracek AS, Hofbauer TM, Scherz T, Artner T, Panagiotides N, Beitzke D, Ruzicka G, Nistler S, Wohlschläger-Krenn E, et al: Culprit site extracellular DNA and microvascular obstruction in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Res. 118:2006–2017. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar

74 

Helseth R, Shetelig C, Andersen GØ, Langseth MS, Limalanathan S, Opstad TB, Arnesen H, Hoffmann P, Eritsland J and Seljeflot I: Neutrophil extracellular trap components associate with infarct size, ventricular function, and clinical outcome in STEMI. Mediators Inflamm. 2019:78164912019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

75 

Hofbauer TM, Mangold A, Scherz T, Seidl V, Panzenböck A, Ondracek AS, Müller J, Schneider M, Binder T, Hell L and Lang IM: Neutrophil extracellular traps and fibrocytes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Basic Res Cardiol. 114:332019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

76 

Zhang X, Song H, Liu D, Cai Y, Liu Z, Zhang X, Zhao X, Zhang Y, Jing Q, Yan C and Han Y: S100A12 triggers NETosis to aggravate myocardial infarction injury via the Annexin A5-calcium axis. Nat Commun. 16:17462025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

77 

Wei X, Zou S, Xie Z, Wang Z, Huang N, Cen Z, Hao Y, Zhang C, Chen Z, Zhao F, et al: EDIL3 deficiency ameliorates adverse cardiac remodelling by neutrophil extracellular traps (NET)-mediated macrophage polarization. Cardiovasc Res. 118:2179–2195. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar

78 

Frustaci A, Chimenti C, Bellocci F, Morgante E, Russo MA and Maseri A: Histological substrate of atrial biopsies in patients with lone atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 96:1180–1184. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

79 

Arroyo AB, de Los Reyes-García AM, Rivera-Caravaca JM, Valledor P, García-Barberá N, Roldán V, Vicente V, Martínez C and González-Conejero R: MiR-146a regulates neutrophil extracellular trap formation that predicts adverse cardiovascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 38:892–902. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

80 

He L, Liu R, Yue H, Zhang X, Pan X, Sun Y, Shi J, Zhu G, Qin C and Guo Y: Interaction between neutrophil extracellular traps and cardiomyocytes contributes to atrial fibrillation progression. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 8:2792023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

81 

Meng S, Huang T, Zhou Z, Yu L and Wang H: Chronic mild stress exacerbates atrial fibrillation and neutrophil extracellular traps formation through S100A8/A9 signaling. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 10:1082025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

82 

Carai P, González LF, Van Bruggen S, Spalart V, De Giorgio D, Geuens N, Martinod K, Jones EAV and Heymans S: Neutrophil inhibition improves acute inflammation in a murine model of viral myocarditis. Cardiovasc Res. 118:3331–3345. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar :

83 

Wang Y, Chen J, Yu S, Yu Y, Yu Y, Shi H, Liu X, Chen Z, Li M, Chen R and Ge J: Neutrophil CAPNS1 regulates cardiac inflammation and injury by promoting NETosis in CVB3-induced myocarditis. Free Radic Biol Med. 248:500–515. 2026. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

84 

Liu X, Li M, Chen Z, Yu Y, Shi H, Yu Y, Wang Y, Chen R and Ge J: Mitochondrial calpain-1 activates NLRP3 inflammasome by cleaving ATP5A1 and inducing mitochondrial ROS in CVB3-induced myocarditis. Basic Res Cardio. 117:402022. View Article : Google Scholar

85 

Li K, Song LL, Ji DJ, Zhao HQ and Wang HP: Correlation between the level of peripheral blood neutrophil extracellular trap nets and T cell expression and prognosis in patients with infective endocarditis. J Mod Lab Med. 37:183–187. 2022.In China.

86 

Jung CJ, Yeh CY, Hsu RB, Lee CM, Shun CT and Chia JS: Endocarditis pathogen promotes vegetation formation by inducing intravascular neutrophil extracellular traps through activated platelets. Circulation. 131:571–581. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

87 

Hsu CC, Chuang YC, Hsu RB, Chen JW, Chia JS, Shih YH, Kuo YM and Jung CJ: Streptococcus gordonii type VII secretion system substrate EsxA induces neutrophil extracellular trap formation in infective endocarditis. Sci Rep. 15:437082025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

88 

Hsu CC, Hsu RB, Ohniwa RL, Chen JW, Yuan CT, Chia JS and Jung CJ: Neutrophil extracellular traps enhance Staphylococcus aureus vegetation formation through interaction with platelets in infective endocarditis. Thromb Haemost. 119:786–796. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

89 

Appelgren D, Dahle C, Knopf J, Bilyy R, Vovk V, Sundgren PC, Bengtsson AA, Wetterö J, Muñoz LE, Herrmann M, et al: Active NET formation in Libman-Sacks endocarditis without antiphospholipid antibodies: A dramatic onset of systemic lupus erythematosus. Autoimmunity. 51:310–318. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

90 

Ziaeian B and Fonarow GC: Epidemiology and aetiology of heart failure. Nat Rev Cardiol. 13:368–378. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

91 

Mann DL: Inflammatory mediators and the failing heart: Past, present, and the foreseeable future. Circ Res. 91:988–998. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

92 

Ichimura S, Misaka T, Ogawara R, Tomita Y, Anzai F, Sato Y, Miura S, Yokokawa T, Sato T, Oikawa M, et al: Neutrophil extracellular traps in myocardial tissue drive cardiac dysfunction and adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure with dilated cardiomyopathy. Circ Heart Fail. 17:e0110572024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

93 

Liu F and Zhai Q: Expression level of neutrophil extracellular traps in peripheral blood of patients with chronic heart failure complicated with venous thrombosis and its clinical significance. J Cardiothorac Surg. 19:1292024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

94 

Tang X, Wang P, Zhang R, Watanabe I, Chang E, Vinayachandran V, Nayak L, Lapping S, Liao S, Madera A, et al: KLF2 regulates neutrophil activation and thrombosis in cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure progression. J Clin Invest. 132:e1471912022. View Article : Google Scholar :

95 

Zhang XL, Wang TY, Chen Z, Wang HW, Yin Y, Wang L, Wang Y, Xu B and Xu W: HMGB1-promoted neutrophil extracellular traps contribute to cardiac diastolic dysfunction in mice. J Am Heart Assoc. 11:e0238002022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

96 

Mang G, Chen J, Sun P, Ma R, Du J, Wang X, Cui J, Yang M, Tong Z, Yan X, et al: Von Willebrand factor exacerbates heart failure through formation of neutrophil extracellular traps. Eur Heart J. 45:3853–3867. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

97 

Zhao M, Zheng Z, Yin Z, Zhang J, Peng S, Liu J, Pan W, Wei C, Xu Y, Qin JJ, et al: DEL-1 deficiency aggravates pressure overload-induced heart failure by promoting neutrophil infiltration and neutrophil extracellular traps formation. Biochem Pharmacol. 218:1159122023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

98 

Libby P: Inflammation in atherosclerosis. Nature. 420:868–874. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

99 

Megens RT, Vijayan S, Lievens D, Döring Y, van Zandvoort MA, Grommes J, Weber C and Soehnlein O: Presence of luminal neutrophil extracellular traps in atherosclerosis. Thromb Haemost. 107:597–598. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

100 

Wang Y, Yang M, Xu Y, Yan S, Jin E and Li X: Neutrophil extracellular trap burden correlates with the stenosis of coronary atherosclerosis. PeerJ. 11:e154712023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

101 

Zhu Y, Wang T, Yang Y, Wang Z, Chen X, Wang L, Niu R, Sun Z, Zhang C, Luo Y, et al: Low shear stress exacerbates atherosclerosis by inducing the generation of neutrophil extracellular traps via Piezo1-mediated mechanosensation. Atherosclerosis. 391:1174732024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

102 

Zhang YG, Song Y, Guo XL, Miao RY, Fu YQ, Miao CF and Zhang C: Exosomes derived from oxLDL-stimulated macrophages induce neutrophil extracellular traps to drive atherosclerosis. Cell Cycle. 18:2674–2684. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

103 

Chen L, Hu L, Li Q, Ma J and Li H: Exosome-encapsulated miR-505 from ox-LDL-treated vascular endothelial cells aggravates atherosclerosis by inducing NET formation. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 51:1233–1241. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

104 

Han H, Liu C, Li M, Wang J, Liu YS, Zhou Y, Li ZC, Hu R, Li ZH, Wang RM, et al: Increased intracellular Cl− concentration mediates neutrophil extracellular traps formation in atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 43:2848–2861. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

105 

Wang Y, Wang W, Wang N, Tall AR and Tabas I: Mitochondrial oxidative stress promotes atherosclerosis and neutrophil extracellular traps in aged mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 37:e99–e107. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

106 

Dhawan UK, Bhattacharya P, Narayanan S, Manickam V, Aggarwal A and Subramanian M: Hypercholesterolemia impairs clearance of neutrophil extracellular traps and promotes inflammation and atherosclerotic plaque progression. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 41:2598–2615. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

107 

Dhawan UK, Vartak T, Englert H, Russo S, Vasconcellos LRC, Singhal A, Chakraborty R, Bhagat KK, McDonnell C, Connolly M, et al: Macrophage DNases limit neutrophil extracellular trap-mediated defective efferocytosis in atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 137:1255–1275. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

108 

Josefs T, Barrett TJ, Brown EJ, Quezada A, Wu X, Voisin M, Amengual J and Fisher EA: Neutrophil extracellular traps promote macrophage inflammation and impair atherosclerosis resolution in diabetic mice. JCI Insight. 5:e1347962020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

109 

Yang M, Chen Q, Mei L, Wen G, An W, Zhou X, Niu K, Liu C, Ren M, Sun K, et al: Neutrophil elastase promotes neointimal hyperplasia by targeting toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)-NF-κB signalling. Br J Pharmacol. 178:4048–4068. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

110 

Schumski A, Ortega-Gómez A, Wichapong K, Winter C, Lemnitzer P, Viola JR, Pinilla-Vera M, Folco E, Solis-Mezarino V, Völker-Albert M, et al: Endotoxinemia accelerates atherosclerosis through electrostatic Charge-mediated monocyte adhesion. Circulation. 143:254–266. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar

111 

Ma X, Zhao X, Yang Y, Yan J, Shi X, Wu H, Liu Y and Dai M: Paeonol inhibits NETs-mediated foam cell inflammation through the CitH3/NLRP3/caspase-1 signaling pathway in atherosclerosis. Int Immunopharmacol. 151:1143402025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

112 

Charkiewicz AE, Garley M, Ratajczak-Wrona W, Nowak K, Jabłońska E, Maślach D and Omeljaniuk WJ: Profile of new vascular damage biomarkers in middle-aged men with arterial hypertension. Adv Med Sci. 66:185–191. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

113 

Krishnan J, Hennen EM, Ao M, Kirabo A, Ahmad T, de la Visitación N and Patrick DM: NETosis drives blood pressure elevation and vascular dysfunction in hypertension. Circ Res. 134:1483–1494. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

114 

Chrysanthopoulou A, Gkaliagkousi E, Lazaridis A, Arelaki S, Pateinakis P, Ntinopoulou M, Mitsios A, Antoniadou C, Argyriou C, Georgiadis GS, et al: Angiotensin II triggers release of neutrophil extracellular traps, linking thromboinflammation with essential hypertension. JCI Insight. 6:e1486682021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

115 

Krishnan J, de la Visitación N, Hennen EM, Amarnath V, Harrison DG and Patrick DM: IsoLGs (Isolevuglandins) drive neutrophil migration in hypertension and are essential for the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps. Hypertension. 79:1644–1655. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

116 

Fang X, Ma L, Wang Y, Ren F, Yu Y, Yuan Z, Wei H, Zhang H and Sun Y: Neutrophil extracellular traps accelerate vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation via Akt/CDKN1b/TK1 accompanying with the occurrence of hypertension. J Hypertens. 40:2045–2057. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

117 

Tu Q, Gong X, Yuan X, Tang Y, Huang R, Jiang Q and Li W: NETs drive myocardial fibrosis in hypertension via an NF-κB/ferroptosis axis. Front Immunol. 16:17127862026. View Article : Google Scholar

118 

Nordon IM, Hinchliffe RJ, Loftus IM and Thompson MM: Pathophysiology and epidemiology of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Nat Rev Cardio. 8:92–102. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar

119 

Meher AK, Spinosa M, Davis JP, Pope N, Laubach VE, Su G, Serbulea V, Leitinger N, Ailawadi G and Upchurch GR Jr: Novel role of IL (Interleukin)-1β in neutrophil extracellular trap formation and abdominal aortic aneurysms. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 38:843–853. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

120 

Wang H, Zhang R, Jia X, Gao S, Gao T, Fan K, Li Y, Wang S, Qiao M, Yan S, et al: Highly sensitive magnetic particle imaging of abdominal aortic aneurysm NETosis with anti-Ly6G iron oxide nanoparticles. Cell Death Discov. 10:3952024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

121 

Xiong Y, Liu S, Liu Y, Zhao J, Sun J, Li Y, Pan B and Wang W: PI3Kγ promotes neutrophil extracellular trap formation by noncanonical pyroptosis in abdominal aortic aneurysm. JCI Insight. 9:e1832372024. View Article : Google Scholar

122 

Tian Z, Zhang Y, Zheng Z, Zhang M, Zhang T, Jin J, Zhang X, Yao G, Kong D, Zhang C, et al: Gut microbiome dysbiosis contributes to abdominal aortic aneurysm by promoting neutrophil extracellular trap formation. Cell Host Microbe. 30:1450–1463. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

123 

Chen L, Liu Y, Wang Z, Zhang L, Xu Y, Li Y, Zhang L, Wang G, Yang S and Xue G: Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles protect against abdominal aortic aneurysm formation by inhibiting NET-induced ferroptosis. Exp Mol Med. 55:939–951. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

124 

Qi Y, Chen L, Ding S, Shen X, Wang Z, Qi H and Yang S: Neutrophil extracellular trap-induced ferroptosis promotes abdominal aortic aneurysm formation via SLC25A11-mediated depletion of mitochondrial glutathione. Free Radic Biol Med. 221:215–224. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

125 

Yang S, Chen L, Wang Z, Chen J, Ni Q, Guo X, Liu W, Lv L and Xue G: Neutrophil extracellular traps induce abdominal aortic aneurysm formation by promoting the synthetic and proinflammatory smooth muscle cell phenotype via Hippo-YAP pathway. Transl Res. 255:85–96. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar

126 

Wei M, Wang X, Song Y, Zhu D, Qi D, Jiao S, Xie G, Liu Y, Yu B, Du J, et al: Inhibition of peptidyl arginine deiminase 4-Dependent neutrophil extracellular trap formation reduces angiotensin II-Induced abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture in mice. Front Cardiovasc Med. 8:6766122021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

127 

Yan H, Zhou HF, Akk A, Hu Y, Springer LE, Ennis TL and Pham CTN: Neutrophil proteases promote experimental abdominal aortic aneurysm via extracellular trap release and plasmacytoid dendritic cell activation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 36:1660–1669. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

128 

Goody PR, Hosen MR, Christmann D, Niepmann ST, Zietzer A, Adam M, Bönner F, Zimmer S, Nickenig G and Jansen F: Aortic valve stenosis: From basic mechanisms to novel therapeutic targets. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 40:885–900. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

129 

Dweck MR, Khaw HJ, Sng GK, Luo EL, Baird A, Williams MC, Makiello P, Mirsadraee S, Joshi NV, van Beek EJ, et al: Aortic stenosis, atherosclerosis, and skeletal bone: Is there a common link with calcification and inflammation? Eur Heart J. 34:1567–1574. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

130 

Aikawa E and Libby P: A Rock and a hard place: Chiseling away at the multiple mechanisms of aortic stenosis. Circulation. 135:1951–1955. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

131 

Kopytek M, Kolasa-Trela R, Ząbczyk M, Undas A and Natorska J: NETosis is associated with the severity of aortic stenosis: Links with inflammation. Int J Cardiol. 286:121–126. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

132 

Mangold A, Ondracek AS, Hofbauer TM, Artner T, Nechvile J, Panagiotides NG, Mirna M, Hammerer M, Fejzic D, Hoppe U, et al: Deoxyribonuclease is prognostic in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Eur J Clin Invest. 51:e135952021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

133 

Mohty D, Pibarot P, Després JP, Côté C, Arsenault B, Cartier A, Cosnay P, Couture C and Mathieu P: Association between plasma LDL particle size, valvular accumulation of oxidized LDL, and inflammation in patients with aortic stenosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 28:187–193. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

134 

Awasthi D, Nagarkoti S, Kumar A, Dubey M, Singh AK, Pathak P, Chandra T, Barthwal MK and Dikshit M: Oxidized LDL induced extracellular trap formation in human neutrophils via TLR-PKC-IRAK-MAPK and NADPH-oxidase activation. Free Radic Biol Med. 93:190–203. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

135 

Akahori H, Tsujino T, Masuyama T and Ishihara M: Mechanisms of aortic stenosis. J Cardiol. 71:215–220. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar

136 

Cotter AB, Costa C, Alhajj N, da Silva JP, Grenha A, Mukherjee S, O'Reilly NJ and Padrela L: Inhalable dry powder formulations of the commercialised form of Deoxyribonuclease I-a dried alternative for the treatment of cystic fibrosis. Eur J Pharm Sci. 220:1074632026. View Article : Google Scholar

137 

Roe T, Talbot T, Terrington I, Johal J, Kemp I, Saeed K, Webb E, Cusack R, Grocott MPW and Dushianthan A: Physiology and pathophysiology of mucus and mucolytic use in critically ill patients. Crit Care. 29:682025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

138 

Saffarzadeh M, Juenemann C, Queisser MA, Lochnit G, Barreto G, Galuska SP, Lohmeyer J and Preissner KT: Neutrophil extracellular traps directly induce epithelial and endothelial cell death: A predominant role of histones. PLoS One. 7:e323662012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

139 

Ulmer JS, Herzka A, Toy KJ, Baker DL, Dodge AH, Sinicropi D, Shak S and Lazarus RA: Engineering actin-resistant human DNase I for treatment of cystic fibrosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 93:8225–8229. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

140 

Lazzaretto B and Fadeel B: Intra- and extracellular degradation of neutrophil extracellular traps by macrophages and dendritic cells. J Immunol. 203:2276–2290. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

141 

Morita M, Stamp G, Robins P, Dulic A, Rosewell I, Hrivnak G, Daly G, Lindahl T and Barnes DE: Gene-targeted mice lacking the Trex1 (DNase III) 3′->5'DNA exonuclease develop inflammatory myocarditis. Mol Cell Biol. 24:6719–6727. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

142 

Iba T, Hashiguchi N, Nagaoka I, Tabe Y, Kadota K and Sato K: Heparins attenuated histone-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro and improved the survival in a rat model of histone-induced organ dysfunction. Intensive Care Med Exp. 3:362015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

143 

Wildhagen KC, García de Frutos P, Reutelingsperger CP, Schrijver R, Aresté C, Ortega-Gómez A, Deckers NM, Hemker HC, Soehnlein O and Nicolaes GA: Nonanticoagulant heparin prevents histone-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro and improves survival in sepsis. Blood. 123:1098–1101. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar

144 

Guzmán MA, Simpson L and Li RHL: Non-anticoagulant heparin attenuates histone-mediated platelet-leukocyte aggregation and neutrophil extracellular trap formation in a canine whole blood model. Front Vet Sci. 13:17784532026. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

145 

Osada K, Minami T, Arioka T, Sakai T, Tawara S, Kawasaki K, Fareed J and Matsuzaki O: Thrombomodulin alfa attenuates the procoagulant effect and cytotoxicity of extracellular histones through the promotion of protein C activation. Thromb Res. 160:51–57. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

146 

Abrams ST, Zhang N, Dart C, Wang SS, Thachil J, Guan Y, Wang G and Toh CH: Human CRP defends against the toxicity of circulating histones. J Immunol. 191:2495–2502. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

147 

Li Y, Zhao J, Wei J, Zhang Y, Zhang H, Li Y, Liao T, Hu Y, Yuan B, Zhang X, et al: Neutrophil elastase inhibitor (Sivelestat) in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome induced by COVID-19: A multicenter retrospective cohort study. Respir Res. 26:282025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

148 

Fukuta T, Okada H, Takemura G, Suzuki K, Takada C, Tomita H, Suzuki A, Oda K, Uchida A, Matsuo S, et al: Neutrophil elastase inhibition ameliorates Endotoxin-induced myocardial injury accompanying degradation of cardiac capillary glycocalyx. Shock. 54:386–393. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar :

149 

Bidouard JP, Duval N, Kapui Z, Herbert JM, O'Connor SE and Janiak P: SSR69071, an elastase inhibitor, reduces myocardial infarct size following ischemia-reperfusion injury. Eur J Pharmacol. 461:49–52. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

150 

Delbosc S, Rouer M, Alsac JM, Louedec L, Philippe M, Meilhac O, Whatling C and Michel JB: Elastase inhibitor AZD9668 treatment prevented progression of experimental abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 63:486–492. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar

151 

Knight JS, Luo W, O'Dell AA, Yalavarthi S, Zhao W, Subramanian V, Guo C, Grenn RC, Thompson PR, Eitzman DT and Kaplan MJ: Peptidylarginine deiminase inhibition reduces vascular damage and modulates innate immune responses in murine models of atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 114:947–956. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

152 

Zou P, Su XD, Tian W, Xie XY and Yang K: Peptidylarginine deiminase 4-mediated citrullination in human disease: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targeting. Front Pharmacol. 17:18540782026. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

153 

Du M, Yang W, Schmull S, Gu J and Xue S: Inhibition of peptidyl arginine deiminase-4 protects against myocardial infarction induced cardiac dysfunction. Int Immunopharmacol. 78:1060552020. View Article : Google Scholar

154 

Heger LA, Schommer N, Fukui S, Van Bruggen S, Sheehy CE, Chu L, Rajagopal S, Sivanandhan D, Ewenstein B and Wagner DD: Inhibition of protein arginine deiminase 4 prevents inflammation-mediated heart failure in arthritis. Life Sci Alliance. 6:e2023020552023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

155 

Li YW, Chen SX, Yang Y, Zhang ZH, Zhou WB, Huang YN, Huang ZQ, He JQ, Chen TF, Wang JF, et al: Colchicine inhibits NETs and alleviates cardiac remodeling after acute myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 38:31–41. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar

156 

Ding H, Cheng CK, Jiang M, Cheng X and Huang Y: Colchicine in cardiovascular medicine: Current perspectives on mechanisms and clinical therapeutics. Pharmacol Ther. 285:1090532026. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

157 

Shirakawa K, Kobayashi E, Ichihara G, Kitakata H, Katsumata Y, Sugai K, Hakamata Y and Sano M: H2 Inhibits the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 7:146–161. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

158 

Khan MA, D'Ovidio A, Tran H and Palaniyar N: Anthracyclines suppress both NADPH Oxidase-dependent and -independent NETosis in human neutrophils. Cancers (Basel). 11:13282019. View Article : Google Scholar

159 

Kindberg KM, Broch K, Andersen GØ, Anstensrud AK, Åkra S, Woxholt S, Tøllefsen IM, Ueland T, Amundsen BH, Kløw NE, et al: Neutrophil Extracellular traps in ST-Segment elevation myocardial infarction: Reduced by tocilizumab and associated with infarct size. JACC Adv. 3:1011932024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

160 

Awasthi D, Nagarkoti S, Sadaf S, Chandra T, Kumar S and Dikshit M: Glycolysis dependent lactate formation in neutrophils: A metabolic link between NOX-dependent and independent NETosis. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 1865:1655422019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

161 

Burczyk G, Cichon I and Kolaczkowska E: Itaconate suppresses formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs): Involvement of Hypoxia-Inducible factor 1α (Hif-1α) and heme oxygenase (HO-1). Front Immunol. 13:8646382022. View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

  • Abstract
  • View
  • Download
  • Twitter
Copy and paste a formatted citation
Spandidos Publications style
Wang Z, Chang M, Shang W, Jia Y, Shan X, Chen X, Yang Y and Zhang J: Neutrophil extracellular traps in cardiovascular disease: Mechanisms and therapeutic implications (Review). Int J Mol Med 58: 323, 2026.
APA
Wang, Z., Chang, M., Shang, W., Jia, Y., Shan, X., Chen, X. ... Zhang, J. (2026). Neutrophil extracellular traps in cardiovascular disease: Mechanisms and therapeutic implications (Review). International Journal of Molecular Medicine, 58, 323. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2026.5994
MLA
Wang, Z., Chang, M., Shang, W., Jia, Y., Shan, X., Chen, X., Yang, Y., Zhang, J."Neutrophil extracellular traps in cardiovascular disease: Mechanisms and therapeutic implications (Review)". International Journal of Molecular Medicine 58.5 (2026): 323.
Chicago
Wang, Z., Chang, M., Shang, W., Jia, Y., Shan, X., Chen, X., Yang, Y., Zhang, J."Neutrophil extracellular traps in cardiovascular disease: Mechanisms and therapeutic implications (Review)". International Journal of Molecular Medicine 58, no. 5 (2026): 323. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2026.5994
Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Wang Z, Chang M, Shang W, Jia Y, Shan X, Chen X, Yang Y and Zhang J: Neutrophil extracellular traps in cardiovascular disease: Mechanisms and therapeutic implications (Review). Int J Mol Med 58: 323, 2026.
APA
Wang, Z., Chang, M., Shang, W., Jia, Y., Shan, X., Chen, X. ... Zhang, J. (2026). Neutrophil extracellular traps in cardiovascular disease: Mechanisms and therapeutic implications (Review). International Journal of Molecular Medicine, 58, 323. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2026.5994
MLA
Wang, Z., Chang, M., Shang, W., Jia, Y., Shan, X., Chen, X., Yang, Y., Zhang, J."Neutrophil extracellular traps in cardiovascular disease: Mechanisms and therapeutic implications (Review)". International Journal of Molecular Medicine 58.5 (2026): 323.
Chicago
Wang, Z., Chang, M., Shang, W., Jia, Y., Shan, X., Chen, X., Yang, Y., Zhang, J."Neutrophil extracellular traps in cardiovascular disease: Mechanisms and therapeutic implications (Review)". International Journal of Molecular Medicine 58, no. 5 (2026): 323. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2026.5994
Follow us
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
About
  • Spandidos Publications
  • Careers
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
How can we help?
  • Help
  • Live Chat
  • Contact
  • Email to our Support Team