Silencing of aquaporin 5 inhibits the growth of A549 lung cancer cells in vitro and in vivo

  • Authors:
    • Lin Zhang
    • Jia Lu
    • Hongyan Zhou
    • Zhenwu Du
    • Guizhen Zhang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: March 16, 2018     https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2018.4326
  • Pages: 1643-1650
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The water channel protein aquaporin 5 (AQP5) is highly expressed in numerous tumors. However, its expression pattern and functions in lung cancer in humans remain unknown. In the present study, the role of AQP5 in the development of lung malignancies was examined. A short hairpin RNA construct targeting AQP5 mRNA was transfected into A549 cells to generate a lung cancer cell line in which AQP5 expression was stably silenced. In vitro and in vivo experiments were then performed to establish the effects of AQP5 on A549 cell apoptosis, proliferation and cell cycle progression. The results demonstrated that AQP5 silencing significantly inhibited the proliferation and promoted the apoptosis of A549 lung cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. In addition, it resulted in decreased activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 signaling pathway in A549 cells, and reduced levels of the downstream proteins c‑Fos and phosphorylated cAMP response element-binding protein. Furthermore, inhibition of AQP5 expression effectively reduced the tumorigenicity of A549 cells in vivo. In conclusion, silencing of AQP5 suppressed the growth of A549 cells in vitro and in vivo, suggesting that it may serve as a therapeutic target in lung cancer.

Introduction

In recent years, lung cancer has been ranked among the primary malignant tumors associated with the highest morbidity and mortality worldwide (13). Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of this disease, accounting for ~80% of all lung malignancies (4,5). Treatment regimens vary and may include radiotherapy, chemotherapy, molecular targeted therapies and surgery, alone or in combination. However, the 5-year survival rate among NSCLC patients remains poor (6,7). Recent technological advances have allowed researchers to identify genetic factors that play essential roles in the pathophysiology of NSCLC, providing novel approaches for the development of treatments for this disease (8,9). Therefore, elucidation of the molecular mechanisms underlying NSCLC and identification of new genetic targets for its treatment should be urgently conducted.

Aquaporins (AQPs), a family of small (30 kDa/monomer) transmembrane water channel proteins, were first described in the late 1950s in red blood cells and later in renal epithelia, and have been identified as key potential targets for novel antitumor therapies (1012). AQP5, one of the most important members of this protein family, is expressed in virtually all normal tissues and contributes to cellular regulation of water homeostasis (13,14). Malignant tumor cells have been reported to take advantage of this process to facilitate their proliferation and development (15,16). In addition, AQP5 gene silencing has been reported to inhibit such proliferation, suggesting that altered AQP5 expression is crucial in tumor progression (17,18). Numerous studies have demonstrated that AQP5 is upregulated in NSCLC, and that AQP5-overexpressing tumor cells are associated with increased tumor growth rates and progression owing to heightened proliferation (1921). However, the association between the AQP5 gene and NSCLC is yet to be fully elucidated.

The aims of the present study were to establish whether AQP5 serves an important role in NSCLC and how AQP5 gene silencing may influence cell proliferation and apoptosis in this malignancy. Furthermore, the underlying molecular mechanisms were examined to provide a new direction for the treatment of NSCLC.

Materials and methods

Cell culture

The cell lines A549, H358, HCC827 and H1299 were obtained from the Cell Bank of the Type Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). The MRC-5 cell line was also purchased from Guangzhou Jinnio Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China). All cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 at 37°C. Cells in the exponential phase of growth were used in subsequent experiments.

Generation of an AQP5-silenced lung cancer cell line

The AQP5 short hairpin RNA (shRNA) expression construct, namely AQP5-pGCH1/Neo, and the non-targeting control construct, namely NC-pGCH1/Neo, were designed and synthesized by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The sequences of the AQP5 and NC shRNA molecules were 5′-CCGGCCATCATCAAAGGCACGTATGCTCGAGCATACGTGCCTTTGATGATGGTTTTTG-3′ and 5′-GATCCCACTACCGTTGTTATAGGTGTTCAAGAGACACCTATAACAACGGTAGTTTTTTTCCAAA-3′, respectively. A549 cells, in which AQP5 was found to be highly expressed (Fig. 1A and B), were transfected with AQP5-pGCH1/Neo or NC-pGCH1/Neo using Lipofectamine® 2000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. At 24 h after transfection, the cells were exposed to 200 μg/ml G418 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) for over a week in order to select clones stably expressing the constructs. Positive clones were selected for further identification.

Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)

Total RNA was extracted from cultured cells with TRIzol reagent (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, and cDNA was then synthesized by reverse transcription. The total PCR reaction volume was 20 μl and consisted of 1 μl of cDNA, 0.5 μl of each primer, 10 μl of SYBR-Green master mix, and 8 μl of ddH2O. The PCR reaction program was as follows: 95°C for 10 min; 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 sec, 60°C for 20 sec, 72°C for 30 sec; and 4°C for 5 min. The primers used to amplify AQP5 and β-actin cDNA were as follows: AQP5 sense, 5′-CTATGAG TCCGAGGAGGATT-3′, and antisense, 5′-GCTTCGCTGTC ATCTGTT-3′; β-actin sense, 5′-CCTGTACGCCAACACAG TGC-3′, and antisense, 5′-ATACTCCTGCTTGCTGATCC-3′. the relative mRNA levels in each sample were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCq method (22), using β-actin as a reference. qPCR was performed using SYBR-Green Master Mix (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd.) in an Exicycler™ 96 quantitative fluorescence analyzer (Bioneer Corporation, Daejeon, Korea).

Western blotting

Cells were lysed (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Haimen, China), and the concentration of protein in lysates was determined by bicinchoninic acid assays (Beyotime). Total proteins (40 μg) from each sample were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (5% acrylamide and 10% separating gel) and then electroblotted onto a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (EMD Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). Subsequent to blocking with evaporated milk 37°C, the membrane was incubated at 4°C overnight with primary antibodies against the following: AQP5, cleaved caspase-3, B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2), Bcl-2-associated X protein (Bax), extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), phosphorylated (p)-ERK, c-Fos, or p-cAMP response element-binding protein (p-CREB) (all diluted 1:1,000; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA). Next, the membranes were exposed to a horseradish peroxidase-labeled secondary antibody (1:5,000; Abcam) at room temperature for 45 min. Proteins were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence reagent (Beyotime), and band intensities were analyzed with Gel-Pro Analyzer software version 4 (Media Cybernetics, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA) for comparison of the gray densities.

Colony formation assay

Cells were seeded onto 35-mm dishes at a density of 200 cells per dish and incubated for 14 days at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. The resulting colonies were rinsed with PBS, at room temperature and fixed with paraformaldehyde for 20 min, and then stained with Giemsa solution (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China) for 5–8 min. The number of colonies consisting of at least 50 cells was then counted under a microscope. Colony formation efficiency was calculated as follows: (Number of colonies / number of inoculated cells) × 100%.

3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay

Cells were seeded into 96-well microplates at a density of 2×103 cells/well and with each well containing 200 μl DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. The cells were allowed to adhere prior to the addition of MTT (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) to each well at a final concentration of 0.2 mg/ml at various time-points (12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h). Subsequent to incubation at 37°C for 4 h, the optical density at 490 nm was measured using an ELx800 microplate reader (BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA).

Flow cytometry for cell cycle progression and apoptosis analyses

For cell cycle analysis, cells were fixed in 70% cold ethanol at 4°C for 3 h, washed in PBS, and then resuspended in staining buffer containing 25 μl propidium iodide (PI) and 10 μl RNaseA (Abcam). The cell suspension was incubated for 45 min in the dark at 37°C, and then subjected to cell cycle distribution analysis by flow cytometry using a FACSCalibur instrument (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).

In addition, apoptotic cells were identified using fluorescence-activated cell sorting and an apoptosis detection kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Nanjing, China), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Cells were harvested, centrifuged at 4°C, 503 x g, 5 min, and then washed with PBS prior to resuspending in 400 μl binding buffer. Next, 5 μl Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate was added to the cell suspensions, which were then incubated at 2–8°C for 15 min in the dark. PI (10 μl) was subsequently added, and the cell suspensions were incubated at 28°C for 5 min in the dark. The cells were then analyzed by flow cytometry within 1 h of this treatment.

In vivo experiments

A total of 18 BALB/c nude mice (4–6-week-old; weight, 20 g) were purchased from Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). The animals were maintained under pathogen-free conditions at 22°C and 40–50% humidity with a 12/12-h light/dark cycle, and had ad libitum access to food and water. Their care and treatment and all animal experiments were approved by the Experimental Animal Ethics Committee of Jilin University (Changchun, China). Each mouse was randomly assigned to one of following three groups (6 mice in each group): A549 (untransfected cells), vector (non-targeting control construct) or AQP5 shRNA groups. Cells (1×106) were suspended in 0.2 ml normal saline and inoculated subcutaneously into the right breast pads of the mice; and the A549 group with 0.2 ml saline only. Tumor volumes in mice were determined using the following formula: Tumor volume = (a x b2)/2, where a and b are the larger and smaller of the two dimensions, respectively. Mice were sacrificed after 30 days, and tumor tissues were removed and fixed in polyformaldehyde after imaging of the tumors for further examination.

Detection of apoptosis using terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay

Apoptosis in the xenograft tumor tissue was detected using an In Situ Cell Death Detection kit (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, paraffin sections (1 cm2) were treated with a solution of H2O2 in order to inactivate endogenous peroxidases, and incubated with 50 μl TUNEL reaction solution at 37°C for 60 min. Subsequently, the sections were washed with PBS and incubated with 50 μl Converter-POD working solution at 37°C for 30 min. Following development using 3,3′-diaminobenzidine and staining of nuclei with hematoxylin, the sections were observed under a microscope and images were captured.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Comparisons between groups were performed using one-way analysis of variance, and multiple comparisons were performed using the Bonferroni post hoc test. GraphPad Prism version 5.0 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) was used to analyze data and generate graphs. Differences associated with P-values of <0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

Results

AQP5 silencing by stable expression of shRNA

In order to examine the function of AQP5 in lung cancer cells, western blotting was used to measure its expression in various human lung cancer cell lines and lung fibroblast cells. Of the cell lines tested, AQP5 expression was observed in all the experimental cell lines, with the highest expression observed in the A549 cells compared with the MRC-5 cell line (Fig. 1A and B). Western blotting also revealed that transfection of the A549 cells with AQP5 shRNA resulted in the significant inhibition of AQP5 protein expression to only 26% of that in the A549 (untransfected) group (Fig. 1A and C; P<0.001). These results were further confirmed by RT-qPCR, which indicated that the expression of AQP5 mRNA was also significantly inhibited in the AQP5 shRNA group and was only 49% of that in the A549 group (Fig. 1D; P<0.001).

AQP5 downregulation inhibits A549 cell proliferation and cell cycle progression

A colony formation assay was used to investigate the possible role of AQP5 in A549 cell growth. The clonogenicity of AQP5 shRNA cells was found to be significantly reduced compared with that of the A549 and vector groups (Fig. 2A and B; P<0.01). Furthermore, the MTT assay demonstrated that proliferation of AQP5 shRNA cells at 72 h (P<0.05) and 96 h (P<0.01) of culture was markedly lower compared with that of cells in the A549 group (Fig. 2C).

To further explore the effect of AQP5 silencing on cell cycle progression, flow cytometry was used to evaluate the distribution of cells in each phase of the cell cycle (Fig. 2D and E). In the AQP5 shRNA group, numerous cells were in G0/G1 phase (P<0.001), whereas the number of those in S (P<0.01) and G2/M (P<0.001) phases was significantly reduced as compared with the A549 control group. No evident difference in cell cycle distribution was noted between the A549 and vector groups.

AQP5 downregulation induces A549 cell apoptosis

Flow cytometry was employed to establish whether AQP5 downregulation significantly affected A549 cell apoptosis. The apoptotic ratio in the AQP5 shRNA group was observed to be 1.54-fold higher compared with that in the A549 group (Fig. 3A and B; P<0.001); thus, apoptosis of A549 cells was significantly increased by AQP5 silencing. Western blotting was subsequently used to measure the expression levels of the apoptosis suppressor Bcl-2 and the downstream executioners of apoptosis, Bax and cleaved caspase-3. The expression levels of cleaved caspase-3 and Bax in cells of the AQP5 shRNA group was 2.68-fold (Fig. 3C and D; P<0.001) and 2.31-fold (Fig. 3C and E; P<0.001) higher, respectively, when compared with those in cells of the A549 group. In addition, the expression of Bcl-2 in the AQP5 shRNA group was only 56% of that in the A549 group (Fig. 3C and F; P<0.001). These findings further indicated that downregulation of AQP5 was able to induce A549 cell apoptosis.

AQP5 downregulation inhibits ERK signaling

The mechanism by which AQP5 silencing affects A549 cell behavior was investigated using western blotting. It was observed that the protein levels of p-ERK, c-Fos and p-CREB in the AQP5 shRNA group were 31% (P<0.001), 41% (P<0.001) and 53% (P<0.001) of those in the A549 group, respectively (Fig. 4). These findings indicated that the downregulation of AQP5 inhibited the activation of the ERK signaling pathway by altering the phosphorylation levels of important ERK pathway proteins, Fos and CREB.

AQP5 downregulation inhibits A549 cell growth in vivo

Based on the results of the in vitro experiments, the present study next investigated the role of AQP5 in A549 cell growth in vivo. The results revealed that tumor volumes and weights in the AQP5 shRNA group were significantly lower in comparison with those in the A549 group (Fig. 5A–C). Furthermore, the TUNEL assay revealed that the number of apoptotic cells was higher in the tumor tissues of the AQP5 shRNA group as compared with those of the A549 groups (Fig. 5D). Thus, downregulation of AQP5 expression may delay lung cancer progression.

Discussion

Lung cancer remains one of the most common malignancies worldwide, and morbidity and mortality associated with this disease have been increasing (3). Despite advances in various treatment options and systemic therapy, such as chemotherapy, in combination with surgery and radiotherapy, the 5-year survival rate of lung cancer patients remains poor (6). AQP5 is one of the most important members of the AQP family, a group of water-transporting transmembrane proteins. Previous studies have demonstrated that due to the particular structure and characteristics of AQP5, its overexpression can have oncogenic effects (11,21,23), including in cancer of the ovary (24), cervix (25) and colon (26), as well as in ovarian epithelium (27) and gastric carcinoma cells (28). However, in lung cancer, it remains to be determined whether the silencing of AQP5 expression affects lung cancer development and the underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated. In the present study, the effects of AQP5 silencing on the proliferation, cell cycle progression and apoptosis of A549 lung cancer cells through the regulation of ERK signaling, as well as on the promotion of apoptosis in lung cancer xenograft tumors in nude mice, were investigated. It was observed that silencing of AQP5 inhibited the proliferation and promoted the apoptosis of A549 cells in vitro and in vivo, suggesting that it may constitute a promising target in the development of novel drugs for lung cancer treatment.

Proliferation, cell cycle progression and apoptosis are the major mechanisms responsible for cell growth. Extension of the G1/S phase transition can effectively inhibit cell proliferation (29). The results of the present study demonstrated that AQP5 was highly expressed in A549 lung cancer cells and functioned as a negative regulator of cell cycle progression. Silencing of AQP5 in A549 cells by RNA interference resulted in cell cycle arrest, with an accumulation of cells in G0/G1 phase and reduced numbers of cells in S and G2/M phases observed. Apoptosis is a well-orchestrated cellular mechanism that helps maintain the balance between cell proliferation and death, the disruption of which is considered to be an early and important event in cancer (30). Apoptosis is regulated by multiple genes at the cellular level, including cleaved caspase-3, Bcl-2 and Bax. Caspase-3 is an effector caspase that initiates cell degradation in the final stages of apoptosis. In addition, Bax, a pro-apoptotic protein, and Bcl-2, a survival-promoting protein, are members of the Bcl-2 family that serve key roles in the regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling (3133). The current study revealed that silencing of AQP5 expression in A549 cells effectively promoted non-viable apoptotic cell increase in vitro and in vivo, downregulating the expression of Bcl-2, and elevating the levels of Bax and cleaved caspase-3.

The ERK1/2 pathway is a classic mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling cascade that regulates cell proliferation and growth (34,35). In the present study, it was observed that silencing of AQP5 inhibited ERK1/2 signaling, consistent with the observations of prior studies (17,36). The downstream ERK signaling proteins c-Fos and CREB, which are present in the eukaryotic nucleus, are phosphorylated upon the activation of ERK signaling (37). The current study results also demonstrated that AQP5 silencing reduced the protein levels of c-Fos and p-CREB. These results suggest that AQP5 downregulation may exert an inhibitory effect on A549 lung cancer cell growth by reducing ERK1/2 signaling.

In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that AQP5 silencing inhibited the proliferation and cell cycle progression of A549 lung cancer cells, and that it inducted induce cell apoptosis in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, this inhibitory effect may be brought about by restriction of ERK1/2 signaling pathway activation. Nevertheless, as AQP5 is widely expressed, further studies of the mechanisms responsible for these effects should be conducted to assess its potential application as a therapeutic target.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Notes

[1] Funding

This study was supported by the Jilin Province major scientific and technological projects (grant no. 20160201001YY).

[2] Authors’ contributions

GZ was the overall advisor of the study; she formulated the experiment plan and examined the accuracy of the experimental results; LZ was involved in the performing of the experiments; JL, HZ and ZD provided experimental and operational support. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

[3] Availability of data and materials

Not applicable

[4] Ethics approval and consent to participate

Animal care and treatment and all animal experiments were approved by the Experimental Animal Ethics Committee of Jilin University (Changchun, China).

[5] Consent for publication

Not applicable.

[6] Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, Jemal A, Yu XQ and He J: Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 66:115–132. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Siegel RL, Miller KD and Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 66:7–30. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Jin C, Zhang G, Zhang Y, Hua P, Song G, Sun M, Li X, Tong T, Li B and Zhang X: Isoalantolactone induces intrinsic apoptosis through p53 signaling pathway in human lung squamous carcinoma cells. PLoS One. 12:e01817312017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

He F, Du T, Jiang Q and Zhang Y: Synergistic effect of Notch-3-specific inhibition and paclitaxel in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells via activation of the intrinsic apoptosis pathway. Med Sci Monit. 23:3760–3769. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Ridge CA, McErlean AM and Ginsberg MS: Epidemiology of lung cancer. Semin Intervent Radiol. 30:93–98. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar :

6 

Wang L, Li R, Che K, Liu Z, Xiang S, Li M and Yu Y: Enhanced antitumor effect on intrapulmonary tumors of docetaxel lung-targeted liposomes in a rabbit model of VX2 orthotopic lung cancer. Sci Rep. 7:100692017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Howington JA, Blum MG, Chang AC, Balekian AA and Murthy SC: Treatment of stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 143:e278S–e313S. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Collisson EA, Campbell JD, Brooks AN, Berger AH, Lee W, Chmielecki J, Beer DG, Cope L, Creighton CJ, Danilova L, et al Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network: Comprehensive molecular profiling of lung adenocarcinoma. Nature. 511:543–550. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Wang M, Lin T, Wang Y, Gao S, Yang Z, Hong X and Chen G: CXCL12 suppresses cisplatin-induced apoptosis through activation of JAK2/STAT3 signaling in human non-small-cell lung cancer cells. Onco Targets Ther. 10:3215–3224. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Agre P and Kozono D: Aquaporin water channels: Molecular mechanisms for human diseases. FEBS Lett. 555:72–78. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Shen Q, Lin W, Luo H, Zhao C, Cheng H, Jiang W and Zhu X: Differential expression of aquaporins in cervical precursor lesions and invasive cervical cancer. Reprod Sci. 23:1551–1558. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Agre P: The aquaporin water channels. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 3:5–13. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Verkman AS: More than just water channels: Unexpected cellular roles of aquaporins. J Cell Sci. 118:3225–3232. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Chae YK, Woo J, Kim MJ, Kang SK, Kim MS, Lee J, Lee SK, Gong G, Kim YH, Soria JC, et al: Expression of aquaporin 5 (AQP5) promotes tumor invasion in human non small cell lung cancer. PLoS One. 3:e21622008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Jung HJ, Park JY, Jeon HS and Kwon TH: Aquaporin-5: A marker protein for proliferation and migration of human breast cancer cells. PLoS One. 6:e284922011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Lee SJ, Kang BW, Kim JG, Jung JH, Lee J, Kim WW, Park HY, Jeong JH, Jeong JY, Park JY, et al: AQP5 variants affect tumoral expression of AQP5 and survival in patients with early breast cancer. Oncology. 92:153–160. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Yang J, Zhang JN, Chen WL, Wang GS, Mao Q, Li SQ, Xiong WH, Lin YY, Ge JW, Li XX, et al: Effects of AQP5 gene silencing on proliferation, migration and apoptosis of human glioma cells through regulating EGFR/ERK/p38 MAPK signaling pathway. Oncotarget. 8:38444–38455. 2017.PubMed/NCBI

18 

Xin LB, Jiang XX, Ye XL, Wu RJ, Xu KH, Ma JY and Lin J: AQP5 gene silencing inhibits proliferation and migration of ectopic endometrial glandular epithelial cells in endometriosis. Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 44:285–292. 2015.In Chinese. PubMed/NCBI

19 

Sugihara I, Yoshida M, Shigenobu T, Takagi H, Maruyama K, Takeuchi N, Toda M, Inoue M and Nakada H: Different progression of tumor xenografts between mucin-producing and mucin-non-producing mammary adenocarcinoma-bearing mice. Cancer Res. 66:6175–6182. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Guo K and Jin F: NFAT5 promotes proliferation and migration of lung adenocarcinoma cells in part through regulating AQP5 expression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 465:644–649. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Direito I, Madeira A, Brito MA and Soveral G: Aquaporin-5: From structure to function and dysfunction in cancer. Cell Mol Life Sci. 73:1623–1640. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Verkman AS, Hara-Chikuma M and Papadopoulos MC: Aquaporins - new players in cancer biology. J Mol Med (Berl). 86:523–529. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Yang JH, Shi YF, Cheng Q and Deng L: Expression and localization of aquaporin-5 in the epithelial ovarian tumors. Gynecol Oncol. 100:294–299. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Zhang T, Zhao C, Chen D and Zhou Z: Overexpression of AQP5 in cervical cancer: Correlation with clinicopathological features and prognosis. Med Oncol. 29:1998–2004. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Shi X, Wu S, Yang Y, Tang L, Wang Y, Dong J, Lü B, Jiang G and Zhao W: AQP5 silencing suppresses p38 MAPK signaling and improves drug resistance in colon cancer cells. Tumour Biol. 35:7035–7045. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Yan C, Zhu Y, Zhang X, Chen X, Zheng W and Yang J: Downregulated aquaporin 5 inhibits proliferation and migration of human epithelial ovarian cancer 3AO cells. J Ovarian Res. 7:782014. View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Huang YH, Zhou XY, Wang HM, Xu H, Chen J and Lv NH: Aquaporin 5 promotes the proliferation and migration of human gastric carcinoma cells. Tumour Biol. 34:1743–1751. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Simpson DJ, Fryer AA, Grossman AB, Wass JA, Pfeifer M, Kros JM, Clayton RN and Farrell WE: Cyclin D1 (CCND1) genotype is associated with tumour grade in sporadic pituitary adenomas. Carcinogenesis. 22:1801–1807. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Qi S, Song Y, Peng Y, Wang H, Long H, Yu X, Li Z, Fang L, Wu A, Luo W, et al: ZEB2 mediates multiple pathways regulating cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and apoptosis in glioma. PLoS One. 7:e388422012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Zarnescu O, Brehar FM, Chivu M and Ciurea AV: Immunohistochemical localization of caspase-3, caspase-9 and Bax in U87 glioblastoma xenografts. J Mol Histol. 39:561–569. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Bhattacharjee M, Acharya S, Ghosh A, Sarkar P, Chatterjee S, Kumar P and Chaudhuri S: Bax and Bid act in synergy to bring about T11TS-mediated glioma apoptosis via the release of mitochondrial cytochrome c and subsequent caspase activation. Int Immunol. 20:1489–1505. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Guo Z, Chen Q, Liu B, Tian D, Zhang S and Li M: LRIG1 enhances chemosensitivity by modulating BCL-2 expression and receptor tyrosine kinase signaling in glioma cells. Yonsei Med J. 55:1196–1205. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

McCubrey JA, Steelman LS, Chappell WH, Abrams SL, Wong EW, Chang F, Lehmann B, Terrian DM, Milella M, Tafuri A, et al: Roles of the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway in cell growth, malignant transformation and drug resistance. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1773:1263–1284. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

35 

Oh SE and Mouradian MM: Cytoprotective mechanisms of DJ-1 against oxidative stress through modulating ERK1/2 and ASK1 signal transduction. Redox Biol. 14:211–217. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar

36 

Zhang Z, Chen Z, Song Y, Zhang P, Hu J and Bai C: Expression of aquaporin 5 increases proliferation and metastasis potential of lung cancer. J Pathol. 221:210–220. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Niu C, Xiao F, Yuan K, Hu X, Lin W, Ma R, Zhang X and Huang Z: Nardosinone suppresses RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis and attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced alveolar bone resorption. Front Pharmacol. 8:6262017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

May-2018
Volume 52 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1019-6439
Online ISSN:1791-2423

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Zhang L, Lu J, Zhou H, Du Z and Zhang G: Silencing of aquaporin 5 inhibits the growth of A549 lung cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Int J Oncol 52: 1643-1650, 2018
APA
Zhang, L., Lu, J., Zhou, H., Du, Z., & Zhang, G. (2018). Silencing of aquaporin 5 inhibits the growth of A549 lung cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. International Journal of Oncology, 52, 1643-1650. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2018.4326
MLA
Zhang, L., Lu, J., Zhou, H., Du, Z., Zhang, G."Silencing of aquaporin 5 inhibits the growth of A549 lung cancer cells in vitro and in vivo". International Journal of Oncology 52.5 (2018): 1643-1650.
Chicago
Zhang, L., Lu, J., Zhou, H., Du, Z., Zhang, G."Silencing of aquaporin 5 inhibits the growth of A549 lung cancer cells in vitro and in vivo". International Journal of Oncology 52, no. 5 (2018): 1643-1650. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2018.4326