Primary adrenal leiomyosarcoma: A case report

Introduction

Leiomyosarcomas (LMS) constitute rare mesenchymal tumors of smooth muscle origin. LMS of the adrenal gland are retroperitoneal tumors in the suprarenal region with less than 50 cases described in the English literature. They are thought to derive from the adrenal vein and/or its branches (1). Adrenal LMS are diagnosed postoperatively after pathologic examination of the surgical specimen; they have no specific clinical or imaging characteristics nor biomarkers and are usually discovered after they have reached a large size due to compressive phenomena (2). The aim of this report is to describe the case of an adrenal LMS in a 62-year-old male patient discovered incidentally.

Case report

An asymptomatic 62-year-old Caucasian male presented to our unit for the investigation of an incidentally found left suprarenal mass, discovered during his annual sonographic follow-up for nephrolithiasis. From his medical history, except for the nephrolithiasis, the patient had diabetes mellitus type II, dyslipidaemia and an appendicectomy performed 30 years ago. Physical examination and laboratory testing revealed no abnormal findings and we proceeded with a computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen with intravenous (IV) and oral contrast agent. CT revealed a low-density mass measuring 10.3x8.5x8.4 cm originating from the left adrenal gland with minor contrast uptake, suspicious of malignancy. The subsequent adrenal protocol magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a 10x8.2 cm mass with low-signal-intensity on T1-weighted (T1W) images and intermediately high-signal-intensity on T2-weighted images (T2W), with heterogeneous contrast uptake, without loss of signal-intensity in out-of-phase gradient recalled echo (GRE) T1W sequence (Fig. 1). The medial border of the tumor appeared to have the morphology of confluent nodules that were possibly representing infiltrated lymph nodes. The mass was rendered as highly suspicious of adrenal malignancy, most probably of adrenocortical carcinoma. We thereafter performed a chest CT scan to exclude the presence of pulmonary metastases, as well as a biochemical evaluation of the patient for hormonal hypersecretion to exclude the possibility of a hormonally active adrenal tumor. Laboratory results were as follows: 24 h urine collection for metanephrine: 62 mcg/24 h [reference range (r.r.) 52-341 mcg/24 h], 24 h urine collection for normetanephrine: 367 mcg/24 h (r.r. 88-444 mcg/24 h), dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (S-DHEA): 186 mcg/dl (r.r. 51.7-295 mcg/dl), plasma renin activity (PRA): 0.21 ng/ml/h (r.r. 0.2-1.4 ng/ml/h), cortisol: 11.9 mcg/dl (r.r. 6.2-19.4 mcg/dl), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH): 39.0 pg/ml (r.r. 7.0-64 pg/ml), aldosterone: 5.11 ng/dl (r.r. 1.0-16 ng/dl), dexamethasone suppression test: cortisol: 0.4 mcg/dl. Blood sample collection was performed on September 27th, 2016.

Figure 1. (A) CT scan of the patient 4 years before diagnosis showing no pathology in the area of the left adrenal (arrow). (B) CT with intravenous contrast showing a 10.3x8.5x8.4 cm mass originating from the left adrenal gland (arrow), with minor contrast uptake. (C) MRI with low signal intensity on T1-weighted images (arrow). (D) MRI with high signal intensity on T2-weighted images (arrow). CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.

The patient underwent left open radical adrenalectomy due to the high possibility of the tumor being a non-secretory adrenocortical carcinoma on account of imaging characteristics and its size. The extent of the resection included the tumor and all peri tumoral fat and para-aortic lymphatic tissue from the diaphragm to the level of the left renal vein. The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged on day 6 after surgery.

Histopathology

The surgical specimen was collected on October 7th, 2016. On gross pathological examination the specimen measured 13x11x6.5 cm and weighted 594 g (Fig. 2). The mass had lobulated appearance, showed areas of cystic degeneration and necrosis in cross section and residual adrenal tissue was identifiable on its outer surface. The tumor was surrounded by fibroadipose tissue measuring 11x8x2 cm.

Figure 2. (A) Surgical specimen after fixation in 4% formaldehyde solution. (B) Surgical specimen sectioned and showing dense tissue with peritumoral- satellite nodules (arrow).

Microscopic examination revealed a spindle cell tumor with intermediate nuclear atypia, significant mitotic activity [7 mitoses/10 high power fields (HPF)] and small areas of ischaemic necrosis. In certain sections the tumor was observed to have grown in the wall of a large vein, most probably the central adrenal vein and in the circumference of the mass adrenal tissue residue was identifiable. Neoplastic cells were also present in the periadrenal fibroadipose tissue with the form of discrete circumscribed nodules.

Immunohistochemistry

Tumor cells were found to be positive for desmin, smooth muscle actin (SMA) and negative for S-100 protein, synaptophysin, chromogranin, pan-cytokeratin (PAN CK), calretinin. The proliferating index Ki-67 was found to be approximately 75% (Fig. 3).

Figure 3. (A) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of the tumor revealing leiomyosarcoma tumor cells originating from the adrenal vein (arrow) and developing in its lumen (arrow heads; x20). (B) High-power-view of tumor cells on hematoxylin and eosin stain revealing abnormal mitotic figure (arrow; x200). (C) Positive Desmin staining (Di-Amino Benzidine, x20). (D) Immunohistochemical staining of cells with Ki-67 marker showing expression in over 75% of the cells (Di-Amino Benzidine, x100).

The final diagnosis of the pathological analysis was well-differentiated leiomyosarcoma of the left adrenal gland with maximum diameter being 13 cm. There were no infiltrated lymph nodes found. What were thought to be infiltrated lymph nodes in the preoperative MRI was neoplastic infiltration of the periadrenal fibroadipose tissue in the form of satellite nodules.

Following the pathological examination report, the Multidisciplinary Oncology Council of our hospital decided the regular follow-up of the patient with image studies, which in 3 months postoperatively showed a metastatic lesion in the 10th thoracic vertebra (retroperitoneal MRI, thoracic spine MRI). The patient was then treated with radiation therapy in the region of the 9th-12th thoracic vertebrae; he received a total dose of 20 Gy, with the daily dose being 4 Gy. The following chest and abdomen CT performed at 7 months postoperatively were negative for pulmonary metastases, but showed metastases in the hepatic parenchyma. The patient was subsequently integrated in the Oncology Department of our Hospital for the initiation of IV chemotherapy treatment with gemcitabine and docetaxel. During this treatment the patient exhibited progression of the disease, developing pulmonary metastases 11 months postoperatively and his chemotherapy regimen was changed to AIM (doxorubicin, ifosfamide, mesna) at 16 months postoperatively, due to radiological evidence of bone, liver and pulmonary metastases growing in number and in size (chest and abdomen CT, skeletal scintigraphy with 99mTc-HDP). The patient continues to receive IV chemotherapy treatment and is alive with metastatic disease 31 months after surgery.

Discussion

Adrenal LMS are non-functional mesenchymal tumors of the adrenal gland, with smooth muscle differentiation, which are thought to derive from the adrenal vein or its branches. They are usually found in image studies as large heterogeneous masses with no specific characteristics, which makes them undistinguishable from other adrenal tumors (3). The pathogenesis of adrenal leiomyosarcoma remains unknown, but there might be a correlation with Epstein-Barr Virus infection in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) (4). The treatment of choice is surgical resection with negative margins, after the evaluation of the tumor secretion to exclude the diagnosis of a functional tumor. Their diagnosis is rendered after pathological examination of the specimen, which is observed microscopically as a spindle cell neoplasia with nuclear atypia or pleomorphism, high mitotic activity and necrotic foci and immunohistochemically is found positive for smooth muscle stains, although there have been described cases with pleomorphic presentation of the tumor (5).

Chemotherapy and radiation therapy have been proposed for locally advanced or metastatic disease but these treatments are yet to be proved beneficial (6). Biopsy of the tumor can provide the necessary histological diagnosis before chemo/radiation therapy if the patient is deemed inoperable (7). Adrenal LMS are usually diagnosed after they have reached a large size due to their lack of specific signs and symptoms, and in many cases the tumor is found to have extended to the inferior vena cava (IVC) upon diagnosis, or to have spread to distant organs (8). In addition, patterns of recurrent disease and metastatic spread render the behavior of this tumor rather aggressive, with longest patient survival being reported as three years after surgery (9).

In conclusion, adrenal LMS are rare tumors found in the suprarenal region, usually diagnosed having reached a large size or after having provoked symptoms due to applying pressure to adjacent structures, or by extending directly to the IVC. Their usual diagnosis in an advanced stage contributes to the poor prognosis of these patients. Their radiological characteristics are similar to those of other adrenal tumors and therefor they should be considered in the differential diagnosis of a suprarenal non-secreting mass with malignant characteristics. The gold standard of treatment is surgical excision, with chemotherapy and radiation therapy being reserved for advanced disease.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

CN, AD and EG contributed to the conception and design of the study. MS, DD and MT acquired, analyzed and interpreted the data. MS, TT and EG drafted the manuscript. CN and TT revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of this manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Oral patient consent was obtained for participation in this study.

Patient consent for publication

Informed consent was obtained for the publication of patient data.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References