Systematic review of single‑port vs. multi‑port surgery for rectal cancer

Tei,Mitsuyoshi; Sueda,Toshinori; Matsumura,Tae; Furukawa,Haruna; Koga,Chikato; Wakasugi,Masaki; Miyagaki,Hiromichi; Kawabata,Ryohei; Tsujie,Masanori; Hasegawa,Junichi

doi:10.3892/mco.2020.2186

Systematic review of single‑port vs. multi‑port surgery for rectal cancer

Authors:
- Mitsuyoshi Tei
- Toshinori Sueda
- Tae Matsumura
- Haruna Furukawa
- Chikato Koga
- Masaki Wakasugi
- Hiromichi Miyagaki
- Ryohei Kawabata
- Masanori Tsujie
- Junichi Hasegawa
View Affiliations

Affiliations: Department of Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Kita‑ku, Sakai, Osaka 591‑8025, Japan
Published online on: December 4, 2020 https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2020.2186
Article Number: 24

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

Abstract

The aim of the current systematic review was to compare the short‑term clinical and oncological outcomes of single‑port surgery (SPS) to multi‑port surgery (MPS) for rectal cancer in MEDLINE, PubMed and Cochrane Library from January 2010 to December 2018. A total of 5 clinical controlled studies composed one randomized pilot study and four non‑randomized studies with a total of 461 patients were analyzed after a systematic review. A total of 125 patients (27.1%) underwent SPS and 336 patients (72.9%) underwent MPS for rectal cancer. The rate of conversion to open surgery was lower in the SPS group compared with the MPS group (0.8 vs. 5.4%, respectively). A total of 16.8% of patients in the SPS group required an additional port to complete the operation. The morbidity rate was lower in the SPS group compared with the MPS group (28.0 vs. 39.0%, respectively). The other short‑term clinical outcomes were similar in both groups. The R0 resection rate was 99.0% in the SPS group and 98.7% in the MPS group. The oncological clearance was satisfactory and similar in both groups. The current study concluded that SPS can be performed safely and provide satisfactory oncological outcomes in patients with rectal cancer. However, further studies are required to determine the role of SPS in the long‑term clinical and oncological outcomes.

View Figures

View References

1	Papaconstantinou HT and Thomas JS: Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: Assessment of oncologic resection and short-term outcomes in a case-matched comparison with standard laparoscopy. Surgery. 150:820–827. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
2	Champagne BJ, Papaconstantinou HT, Parmar SS, Nagle DA, Young-Fadok TM, Lee EC and Delaney CP: Single-incision versus standard multiport laparoscopic colectomy: A multicenter, case-controlled comparison. Ann Surg. 255:66–69. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
3	Poon JT, Cheung CW, Fan JK, Lo OS and Law WL: Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic colectomy for colonic neoplasm: A randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 26:2729–2734. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
4	Takemasa I, Uemura M, Nishimura J, Mizushima T, Yamamoto H, Ikeda M, Sekimoto M, Doki Y and Mori M: Feasibility of single-site laparoscopic colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: A prospective case-control comparison. Surg Endosc. 28:1110–1118. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
5	Katsuno G, Fukunaga M, Nagakari K, Yoshikawa S, Azuma D and Kohama S: Short-term and long-term outcomes of single-incision versus multi-incision laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer: A propensity-score-matched analysis of 214 cases. Surg Endosc. 30:1317–1325. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
6	Tei M, Wakasugi M and Akamatsu H: Comparison of perioperative and short-term oncological outcomes after single- or multiport surgery for colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 17:O141–O147. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
7	Tei M, Otsuka M, Suzuki Y, Kishi K, Tanemura M and Akamatsu H: Safety and feasibility of single-port laparoscopic low anterior resection for upper rectal cancer. Am J Surg. 216:1101–1106. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
8	Bulut O, Aslak KK, Levic K, Nielsen CB, Rømer E, Sørensen S, Christensen IJ and Nielsen HJ: A randomized pilot study on single-port versus conventional laparoscopic rectal surgery: Effects on postoperative pain and the stress response to surgery. Tech Coloproctol. 19:11–22. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
9	Levic K and Bulut O: The short-term outcomes of conventional and single-port laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: A comparative non-randomized study. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 23:214–222. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
10	Nerup N, Rosenstock S and Bulut O: Comparison of single-port and conventional laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection. J Minim Access Surg. 14:27–32. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
11	Sourrouille I, Dumont F, Goéré D, Honoré C and Elias D: Resection of rectal cancer via an abdominal single-port access: Short-term results and comparison with standard laparoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum. 56:1203–1210. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
12	Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM and Visa J: Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: A randomised trial. Lancet. 359:2224–2229. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
13	Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Ng SS, Lai PB and Lau WY: Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: Prospective randomised trial. Lancet. 363:1187–1192. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
14	Remzi FH, Kirat HT, Kaouk JH and Geisler DP: Single-port laparoscopy in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 10:823–826. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
15	Bucher P, Pugin F and Morel P: Single port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis. 23:1013–1016. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
16	Kim CW, Kim WR, Kim HY, Kang J, Hur H, Min BS, Baik SH, Lee KY and Kim NK: Learning curve for single-incision laparoscopic anterior resection for sigmoid colon cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 221:397–403. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
17	Li J, Wang Y, Liu D, Zhou H, Mou T, Li G and Deng H: Multidimensional analyses of the learning curve for single-incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 117:1386–1393. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
18	Gash K, Bicsak M and Dixon A: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: Early results and medium-term oncological outcome. Colorectal Dis. 17:1071–1078. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
19	Hirano Y, Hattori M, Douden K, Shimada M and Hashizume Y: Short-term clinical and oncological outcomes after single-incision plus one port laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer. Dig Surg. 35:111–115. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
20	van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Fürst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC and Bonjer HJ: COlorectal cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection II (COLOR II) Study Group. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): Short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 14:210–218. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
21	Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, Nam BH, Choi HS, Kim DW, Lim SB, Lee TG, Kim DY, Kim JS, et al: Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): Short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 11:637–645. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
22	Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Lacy AM, Bemelman WA, Andersson J, Angenete E, et al: A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 372:1324–1332. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
23	Jeong SY, Park JW, Nam BH, Kim S, Kang SB, Lim SB, Choi HS, Kim DW, Chang HJ, Kim DY, et al: Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): Survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 15:767–774. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar