Leiomyosarcoma of the splenic vein with a history of bilateral retinoblastoma: A case report and review of the literature

Introduction

Primary leiomyosarcoma usually occurs in the fifth and sixth decades of life. The most common clinical symptoms are abdominal pain and gastrointestinal bleeding (1). This type of tumor originates from smooth muscle cells and mainly occurs in the retroperitoneum and abdomen (2). The overall incidence of vascular leiomyosarcoma has been reported to be <2% (3). Complete surgical resection is considered to be the cornerstone of treatment for localized vascular leiomyosarcomas, while the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation remains unknown (4). The prognosis of patients with vascular leiomyosarcoma is reportedly poorer compared with the prognosis of patients with leiomyosarcomas of different origins (4). Primary leiomyosarcoma arising from the splenic vein is an extremely rare occurrence and its clinical features are incompletely understood. The clinical diagnosis of this condition remains challenging, despite advancements in imaging modalities, owing to its rarity. Furthermore, evidence regarding treatment strategies, including postoperative adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy, is scarce. We herein describe the case of a patient with a history of retinoblastoma who was diagnosed with leiomyosarcoma originating from the splenic vein and was treated with pancreatosplenectomy and subsequent transcatheter arterial chemoembolization due to the development of hepatic metastases 5 months postoperatively (5). The aim of the present report was to help with the development of clinical guidelines for leiomyosarcomas of the splenic vein.

Case report

A 45-year-old Japanese woman, who had a history of infantile retinoblastoma treated by enucleation and chronic hepatitis C diagnosed in her twenties, underwent a routine medical check-up at Hiroo Medical Clinic (Tokyo, Japan). In May 2015, the patient presented to the hospital with no apparent symptoms. Abdominal ultrasonography revealed a mass ~40 mm in size located posterior to the pancreatic tail. The pancreatic body was observed to be distended dorsally on CT examination. The adrenal gland was independently identified, and it was determined that the lesion did not originate from the adrenal gland. In addition, the lesion appeared to have no border with the pancreatic parenchyma and had the same signal intensity as the pancreas. There was a tear in the splenic vein, and the epiploic veins were highly developed as collateral blood vessels, which is an atypical finding in carcinoma. On MRI examination, the lesion appeared as a well-circumscribed mass that compressed the pancreas posteriorly with no invasion into the pancreatic parenchyma. The signal intensity of the mass was lower on T1-weighted images and higher on T2-weighted images as compared to that of the pancreas. The signal intensity of the lesion on diffusion-weighted images was high and that on an apparent diffusion coefficient map was low, suggesting that the lesion had a high cellular density. The value of the apparent diffusion coefficient was 0.911. Although the pattern of these signal intensities was similar to that of the spleen, the signal intensity of the lesion on T2-weighted images was lower than that of the spleen (Fig. 1). Ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI performed 1 month after the patient's initial visit revealed that the lesion had a higher signal intensity than the spleen, indicating that the lesion was not an accessory spleen. Furthermore, the lesion had not increased in size in 1 month, indicating that it was possibly not a malignant tumor. Therefore, the lesion was suspected to be an extrapancreatic tumor, such as a retroperitoneal tumor similar to that observed in Castleman's disease (6). In September 2015, the patient was subsequently referred to Toranomon Hospital for further evaluation and management of the mass. Considering the highly invasive nature of the surgery and the patient's refusal to undergo surgery, we decided to perform regular follow-ups semiannually using ultrasonography and MRI examination. An abdominal ultrasound carried out 5 years after the first visit to our institution revealed an increase in the size of the mass to 50 mm, which was highly suggestive of a malignancy. Contrast-enhanced CT revealed a well-defined mass with heterogeneous contrast in the early phase and good enhancement in the delayed phase. No significant enlargement of the surrounding lymph nodes was observed. Obstruction of the splenic vein was observed. There was no invasion into other organs or the renal veins (Fig. 2). Endoscopic ultrasonography revealed a solid component in the splenic vein that appeared as a thickening of the vascular wall, and it was contiguous with the mass. Furthermore, multiple vessels were observed inside the mass. The mass formed a tumor embolus within the splenic vein, and a portion of the splenic vein had increased in size to 49x33 mm. Although the tumor growth was relatively slow, the presence of the tumor embolus suggested that the mass was a malignant tumor. MRI was not performed, as the aforementioned imaging studies were considered to be sufficient for the development of the treatment strategy preoperatively. The levels of serum tumor markers, such as carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9, were within the normal range. The serum amylase, lipase, elastase 1 and immunoglobulin G4 levels were within the normal limits. The differential diagnosis included pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma, pancreatoblastoma, neuroendocrine tumor, gastrointestinal stromal tumor or other types of retroperitoneal tumors. Surgical resection was decided after discussing the options with the patient.

Figure 1 MRI taken at the initial hospital visit. A well-defined mass (arrows) was identified compressing the pancreas posteriorly with (A) a low signal on T1-weighted images, (B) a high signal on T2-weighted images and (C) a high signal on diffusion-weighted images. The signal intensity of the lesion on an apparent diffusion coefficient map was low. (D) The value of apparent diffusion coefficient was 0.911.

Figure 2 CT examination performed immediately prior to the surgical resection. A well-circumscribed mass (arrows) was identified, with (A) heterogenous contrast in the early phase and (B) good enhancement in the delayed phase. (C) Development of the epiploic veins (arrow) as collateral vessels was observed on angiography.

Open radical antegrade modular pancreatectomy was performed in August 2020. No ascites, dissemination, or distant metastasis were observed intraoperatively; the epiploic veins were prominently dilated. The gastrosplenic ligament was excised. The mass was a tense, elastically hard tumor located at the pancreatic tail; the pancreas appeared normal. Intraoperative ultrasound revealed a well-defined, hypervascular mass contiguous to the splenic vein. The splenic artery was ligated at its origin. The pancreas was sectioned at the level of the left border of the portal vein, and the splenic vein was subsequently divided to the terminal end. The dissection proceeded anterior to the adrenal gland in a right-to-left antegrade manner. The splenorenal ligament was divided and the spleen was mobilized. The entire specimen was then resected; R0 resection was successfully performed. The operative time was 106 min, and the total intraoperative blood loss was 247 ml.

Macroscopic examination revealed that the tumor was located in the splenic vein, forming a tumor thrombus, and small tumor nodules were present in the pancreas. Histologically, the tumor was composed of spindle cells arranged in interlacing fascicles. The tumor cells were immunohistochemically positive for desmin, h-caldesmon, muscle-specific actin and α-smooth muscle actin. Microscopic examination showed tumor infiltration beyond the wall of the splenic vein and into the surrounding soft tissue and pancreatic parenchyma. The pathological diagnosis was leiomyosarcoma arising from the splenic vein (Fig. 3).

Figure 3 Surgical specimen. (A) Gross appearance. The cut surface of the tumor appeared whitish. The tumor was mostly located in the splenic vein, with small nodules in the pancreas. (B) Histological findings (H&E staining; scale bar, 100 µm). The tumor was composed of fascicles of interlacing spindle cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm and atypical nuclei. (C) Immunostaining (scale bar, 200 µm). The tumor cells exhibited diffuse positivity for h-caldesmon.

The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 15. Following an institutional multidisciplinary cancer board discussion, regular follow-up visits were scheduled for the patient, as no effective evidence-based chemotherapy was available in this case.

At a regular medical check-up 5 months postoperatively, abdominal ultrasound revealed four space-occupying lesions in the liver. Contrast-enhanced CT revealed four masses up to 15 mm in size, with indistinct borders, showing high and intermediate signal intensity in the early and in the portal and late phases, respectively. There were no other apparent lesions. Chemotherapy was ruled out as a treatment option, and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) was performed using epirubicin in March 2021, since the lesions were limited to the liver. The tumors were pathologically diagnosed as leiomyosarcomas by needle biopsy.

Since the last TACE procedure, the patient has been regularly followed up with abdominal ultrasound and CT conducted at each visit; no recurrence was observed on the last follow-up visit in August 2021.

Discussion

Leiomyosarcoma is a rare malignant mesenchymal tumor originating from smooth muscle cells, which is usually located in the retroperitoneum, mesentery, omentum, uterus or subcutaneous tissue (7). Leiomyosarcomas of vascular origin account for <2% of all cases (3). Venous leiomyosarcomas are mainly observed in women between their fifth and sixth decades of life (8). Furthermore, 75% of large-vessel leiomyosarcomas are observed in the inferior vena cava (9,10). However, those derived from the splenic vein have been reported in only a few previous studies. To the best of our knowledge, only five previous studies have reported cases of leiomyosarcoma of the splenic vein (Table I) (7,11-14).

Table I Summary of the previous reports of leiomyosarcoma of splenic vein.

Table I

Summary of the previous reports of leiomyosarcoma of splenic vein.

Study (Refs.)	Age (years)	Sex	Medical history	Clinical manifestations	Tumor marker	Treatment	Resection margin	Adjuvant therapy	Follow-up (months)	Postoperative metastasis	Outcome
Niver et al (7)	58	F	Unknown	Epigastric pain	Unknown	Distal pancreatosplenectomy, reconstruction of the portal vein	Unknown	None	Unknown	None	Alive
Gage et al (13)	58	F	Unremarkable	Epigastric pain, splenic vein thrombosis	Unknown	Distal pancreatosplenectomy, reconstruction of the portal vein	Free	None	15	None	Alive
Aguilar et al (11)	66	F	Unremarkable	Epigastric pain, constipation, weight loss	Unknown	Distal pancreatosplenectomy	Free	Doxorubicin + ifosfamide	12	None	Alive
Patrono et al (12)	58	F	Unremarkable	Epigastric pain	Normal	Local excision, splenic vein anastomosis	Free	None	12	None	Alive
Wu et al (14)	52	M	Unremarkable	Epigastric pain	Unknown	Splenic pedicle tumor resection, splenectomy, liver tumor resection	Unknown	None	Unknown	None	Alive
Present case	50	F	Retinoblastoma	None	Normal	Distal pancreatosplenectomy	Free	None	10	Liver metastasis	Alive

Due to its rarity, the differential diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma of the splenic vein is challenging. However, early-stage diagnosis is crucial, as surgical resection is the only curative option in such cases (15,16). Ultrasound examination is frequently performed as the first diagnostic tool. Leiomyosarcoma is characterized as a circumscribed, soft tissue mass, commonly accompanied by necrosis, cystic degeneration and hemorrhage on CT (17,18). In the present case, there were two possible diagnoses: A primary retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma with secondary venous invasion or a primary venous leiomyosarcoma with secondary extravascular extension, as in the study by Niver et al (7). It was difficult to determine whether the tumor originated from the retroperitoneum or the vasculature preoperatively.

As regards the treatment strategy, en bloc resection is the only curative treatment option for this condition in the absence of disseminated disease (13), although the prognostic value of microscopic involvement of the resection margin remains disputable (16). Furthermore, in all the previous reports of leiomyosarcoma of the splenic vein, the correct diagnosis was established only after surgical resection (7,11-14). Radiation treatment is commonly performed for high-grade soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities, intermediate-grade tumors of the limbs with close margins, and recurring low-grade sarcomas (14). Among retroperitoneal sarcomas, primary leiomyosarcomas of vascular origin have the highest incidence of local recurrence and the worst long-term survival outcomes (16). The incidence of post-resection metastases is ~40% in such cases (9,19). The high risk of local recurrence of leiomyosarcoma may justify adjuvant radiotherapy in some cases. While chemotherapy can be performed for systemic control, the sensitivity of sarcomas to chemotherapy is considered to be low (20). Therefore, the role of chemotherapy as an adjuvant treatment for leiomyosarcoma for prolonging life expectancy has not yet been established (20). Evidence of prolonged survival due to adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy is scarce. Among previous reports of leiomyosarcomas of the splenic vein, only one study reported that the patient underwent postoperative adjuvant therapy (Table I) (11). In a meta-analysis of soft tissue sarcomas treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, no improvement in prognosis was observed (21).

A history of hereditary retinoblastoma is associated with an increased incidence of a second, non-ocular, primary tumor (22). Retinoblastoma is an uncommon childhood tumor with an incidence of 1 per 20,000 live births (22). It can exhibit an autosomal dominant form of inheritance, although the majority of retinoblastomas are sporadic. The incidence of second non-ocular primary tumors is known to increase with time, and tumor development is associated with the loss of tumor suppressor activity caused by alterations in the Rb1 gene due to radiation, genetic mutations, or other causes (23). Although various types of secondary malignant tumors have been reported in patients with hereditary retinoblastoma, no cases of secondary tumors with splenic vein origin have previously been reported in such patients, to the best of the authors' knowledge.

In the present case, despite complete resection with a negative margin, hepatic recurrence was identified within 1 year after resection. Taking into consideration the poor outcomes of leiomyosarcomas of venous origin, successful resection may have contributed to an improved prognosis in the present case, although continuous follow-up is required.

In conclusion, the present report of a leiomyosarcoma originating in the splenic vein is, to the best of our knowledge, the sixth case of a splenic vein leiomyosarcoma reported in the English literature to date. There are currently insufficient case reports to develop clinical guidelines regarding treatment strategies for leiomyosarcoma of the splenic vein. The importance of this case lies with the rarity of leiomyosarcoma of the splenic vein and the rarity of leiomyosarcoma as a second non-ocular tumor in patients with a history of retinoblastoma. Recognition of this clinical condition at the preoperative examination stage may prove helpful for preoperative diagnosis.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding: No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

MA wrote the manuscript and contributed to its design. MH contributed to the operation and helped draft the manuscript. DH, RK and TI performed patient follow-up and provided advice on patient treatment. YT contributed to the pathological diagnosis. MH and TI have seen and confirmed the authenticity of the raw data. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient regarding the publication of the case details and any associated images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References