International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.
International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.
Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.
Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.
Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.
Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.
International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.
Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.
Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.
Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.
An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.
The incidence of gynecological tumors in China is increasing annually, accounting for 15-20% of female malignant tumors; its overall incidence is on the rise (1) and has become the third most lethal disease among female tumors (2). For patients with early-stage gynecological tumors, standard treatment can notably improve prognosis. Nevertheless, for recurrent, metastatic and drug-resistant patients, there is often a lack of effective therapeutic measures in the early stage of disease. Besides, research into the mechanisms contributing to the poor prognosis of tumor therapy remains insufficient. Therefore, discovering new biomarkers and therapeutic targets is the top priority for curing gynecological tumors.
Complement component 1 Q subcomponent-binding protein (C1QBP), a multifunctional protein, is upregulated in a variety of tumor types (3-5). C1QBP plays a vital role in both normal physiological processes and the development of various tumors such as cervical, ovarian and endometrial cancer, particularly by regulating critical biological processes such as proliferation, migration and invasion (3-7). However, multiple questions still remain concerning the specific mechanism or the role of C1QBP in gynecological tumors and its potential as a therapeutic target. In view of these findings, the present review summarizes the research progress on C1QBP in gynecological tumors in recent years, explores its mechanism of action in tumorigenesis and development and assesses its potential as a biomarker and therapeutic target, with the aim of providing a theoretical basis for subsequent research. A search for articles was conducted using databases such as Web of Science (https://www.webofscience.com/), PubMed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and CNKI (https://www.cnki.net/). The key words included ‘gynecological tumors’, ‘ovarian cancer’, ‘endometrial cancer’, ‘cervical cancer’, ‘mitochondria’, ‘C1QBP protein’, ‘tumor pathogenesis’, ‘clinical’ and ‘non-clinical’. Literature published in Chinese and English were focused on the reduce information overload and improve research efficiency. Additionally, literature within a 16-year range (2010-2016) was focused on, but earlier literature was included if the content was particularly relevant to the topic. To the best of our knowledge, the present review is the first to provide a detailed description of the role of C1QBP in gynecological tumors and its related mechanisms and to summarize the retrospective research results in recent years.
C1QBP was initially isolated from human Burkitt lymphoma cell membranes (8). C1QBP, also known as p32 or gC1qR, is a multifunctional and evolutionarily conserved protein predominantly localized in the mitochondrial matrix. The C1QBP gene is located on chromosome 17 and p53 can bind to the promoter region of the C1QBP gene to influence its transcription (9,10). The C1QBP precursor protein consists of 282 amino acids and eventually forms a mature protein of 209 amino acids (8) (Fig. 1). C1QBP is a donut-shaped, acidic protein located in the mitochondrial matrix. Crystal structure analysis reveals that it folds into a characteristic trimeric architecture, with each monomer consisting of seven antiparallel β-strands (β1-β7), in which a highly distorted antiparallel β-fold is formed where the β1 strand is positioned almost perpendicular to β7 (11). This β-fold consists of an N-terminal α-helix and two C-terminal α-helices, whose distinctive features add to the stability of the structure (11). The high negative charge density and asymmetric charge distribution result in functional roles on both sides of the protein that are asymmetric, which is essential for protein-protein interactions and ligand binding (11,12).
C1QBP is widely expressed in several subcellular compartments, including the nucleus, Golgi, endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria. C1QBP fulfills specific biological functions according to the distribution states in different microenvironments (13). For example, C1QBP in the nucleus participates in the regulation of RNA metabolism and a study has reported that C1QBP distributed in the Golgi network participates in cellular mitosis (14). C1QBP also has an important role in the morphology and structure of the endoplasmic reticulum under normal cellular conditions. For instance, a lack of C1QBP leads to fragmentation of the endoplasmic reticulum structure, dissociation of ribosomes and ultimately the inability to synthesize proteins, lipids and other substances in normal cells (15). In addition, when localized in mitochondria, C1QBP is involved in mitochondrial quality control and metabolism (16), maintenance of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) (12) and the synthesis of mitochondrial proteins (8).
C1QBP also participates in the regulation of immune cells. Gotoh et al (17) reported that C1QBP supports the maturation of dendritic cells, which induces primary immune responses. C1QBP is closely related to the regulation of humoral immunity. After complement activation, the generated fragments, such as C3d, covalently bind to the surface of the activating antigen involving a pathogen and immune complex (18). B cells recognize C3d through their complement receptor 2 and obtain a strong co-stimulatory signal, enhancing the immunogenicity of the antigen. C1QBP indirectly controls this key process by regulating the complement activation front (12). By binding to C1q in its soluble form, C1QBP inhibits classical pathway activation and subsequent C3d production. Conversely, when expressed on the cell surface under pathological conditions, C1QBP can directly activate the classical complement pathway, leading to enhanced C3d deposition and modulation of B cell co-stimulatory signals (12). Furthermore, C1QBP mediates the clearance of complement component 1q (C1q)-coated immune complexes and apoptotic cells by phagocytes. The absence of C1q or the presence of anti-C1q antibodies can lead to the deposition of immune complexes in tissues such as the kidneys, triggering autoimmune diseases such as lupus nephritis, which is a pathological form of humoral immunity (19). Additionally, C1QBP can promote the coagulation process by inhibiting fibrin polymerization (20). C1QBP is involved in the regulation of nuclear function; it not only regulates apoptosis but also regulates the splicing process through the interaction of the function and/or localization of different splicing factors (21,22). C1QBP also promotes the occurrence of microbial infection. Staphylococcus aureus protein A contributes to pathogenesis by interacting with the host complement receptor C1QBP (23). Hepatitis C virus, human immunodeficiency virus, herpes simplex virion type 1 and Epstein-Barr virus can bind to C1QBP on the surface of T lymphocytes and inhibit the proliferation of T cells, thus exerting immunosuppressive effects (12,24,25). Plasmodium falciparum infected red blood cells can not only use C1QBP as a receptor to bind to human endothelial cells but also bind to C1QBP on platelets to form clumps, thereby mediating vascular endothelial cell proliferation. These two factors are the key mechanisms of malaria pathogenesis (26). In summary, C1QBP is related to humoral immunity, coagulation and fibrin polymerization as well as microbial infection, which is summarized in Fig. 2.
As aforementioned, the unique structural features of C1QBP allow it to interact with several different ligands and regulate their functions. At present, the main ligands identified are C1q, calreticulin, hyaluronic acid (HA), the splicing factor ASF/SF2 and CD44(27). C1QBP was initially identified as a receptor for C1q in the study by Ghebrehiwet et al (12), and initiates organismal immunity by activating the classical complement pathway. The binding of C1QBP to calreticulin is related to the adhesion and spreading of endothelial cells (28). Furthermore, the binding of C1QBP to HA promotes the adhesion and de-adhesion of cells (29). The binding of C1QBP to ASF/SF2 blocks ASF/SF2 phosphorylation and inhibits its binding to pre-messenger RNA, thereby inhibiting its role as an initiator of pre-spliceosome formation (30). Besides, the interaction of C1QBP with CD44v6 in lipid rafts, a cholesterol-rich and sphingomyelin-rich microstructural domain of plasma membranes, promotes the phosphorylation of insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor, thereby activating downstream PI3K and MAPK signaling pathways that mediate the metastatic potential of pancreatic cancer cells (31). In summary, C1QBP is involved in regulating gene expression, splicing, mitochondrial metabolism and cell signaling and plays a vital role in tumor development.
The mitochondrial localization of C1QBP is associated with multiple biological processes, including mitochondrial morphology regulation, metabolic regulation, cell fate determination and disease (32). Knockdown of C1QBP leads to abnormal mitochondrial morphology and ultrastructural damage, indicating its key role in maintaining the dynamic balance of the mitochondrial network (15). C1QBP is a key regulator of Y-box binding protein 1 (YBX1), enhancing the expression of respiratory complexes, ATP production and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation through promoting the translation of mitochondrial gene-encoded proteins (33). The mitochondrial dysfunction of C1QBP is also closely related to cancer, including gynecological cancer (Table I).
C1OBP is highly expressed in epithelial tumors of the breast, lung, liver, prostate and colon, as well as in squamous and basal cell carcinoma (34-39). The expression level of C1QBP is also increased in inflammatory lesions and cells with a high cell division rate (32). The data accumulated so far indicate that C1QBP is upregulated in most cancer cells and it not only participates in shaping the inflammatory tumor microenvironment, but also regulates mitochondrial metabolism and dynamics, angiogenesis, metastasis and cell proliferation (40). Moreover, C1QBP enhances anti-apoptotic ability and induces resistance to cisplatin (41). The key regulatory roles of C1QBP in different physiological and pathological processes are summarized in Fig. 2.
Cell migration is the hallmark of cancer, regulating the anchorage-independent growth and invasiveness of tumor cells (42). C1QBP plays a crucial role in the growth, survival, metastasis and invasion of tumor cells. The expression level of C1QBP is associated with the stage, grade, size and clinical prognosis of the tumor (3-5). In breast cancer, the upregulation of C1QBP is significantly associated with distant metastasis, higher TNM stage, larger tumor volume, axillary lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis (43,44). Furthermore, when C1QBP is absent, the proliferation, migration and invasion of liver cancer cells is reduced, while cell apoptosis increases (45). C1QBP induces tumor cell migration and tumor growth by interacting with integrin and activating matrix metalloproteinase-2 through a nuclear factor-κB-dependent mechanism (32,46). C1QBP interacts with YBX1, inhibiting the activation of YBX1 by altering its phosphorylation and nuclear transport (47). This inhibition of YBX1 leads to the suppression of its activity in renal cell carcinoma cells, potentially preventing the migration and invasion of renal cell carcinoma (48). The inhibition of YBX1 might involve altering the matrix metalloprotease 9 signaling pathway (48). Besides, C1QBP promotes melanoma progression and metastasis by targeting epithelial mesenchymal transition markers, the Akt/protein kinase B pathway and the tumor microenvironment (49,50). Additionally, the enhanced migration, invasion and proliferation of oral squamous cell carcinoma cells in vitro is dependent on C1QBP (51). In conclusion, C1QBP regulates tumor growth and invasion through multiple pathways (40). In cancer cells, C1QBP further enhances OXPHOS activity by stabilizing proteins such as PA28y, thereby supporting the energy and biosynthesis required for tumor growth, and high expression of C1QBP promotes malignant progression by regulating cell proliferation, migration, apoptosis and differentiation, whereas its inhibition can induce apoptosis and enhance glycolysis (52).
Studies have shown that the absence of the C1QBP gene activates the overlapping activity with m-AAA protease, thereby cleaving optic atrophy 1, leading to mitochondrial division and swelling, accompanied by altered expression of Mitofusin1 and Mitofusin2 (53,54). C1QBP is also crucial for maintaining metabolic homeostasis and stress responses; it supports cell survival during nutrient deprivation by facilitating autophagic flux and preserving mitochondrial OXPHOS function, processes vital for adaptation to starvation (55). The tumor occurrence mediated by C1QBP is closely related to the maintenance of mitochondrial metabolism. Reducing the expression of C1OBP in human cancer cells significantly alters their metabolic patterns, reprogramming metabolism from OXPHOS to glycolysis (56,57). The absence of C1QBP leads to a reduced ability of tumors to form within the body, which may be due to a decrease in the synthesis of OXPHOS proteins encoded by mitochondrial DNA. Glutamine is an important substrate for mitochondrial metabolism. The higher the degree of tumor progression, the greater the amount of glutamine oxidation in the body, reflecting an increased demand for mitochondrial anaplerosis to fuel the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle. This heightened state of glutamine metabolism stands in stark contrast to the metabolic state observed upon C1QBP loss, where impaired OXPHOS and a shift toward glycolysis suggest an inability to effectively utilize such mitochondrial substrates (58). Myc upregulates the transcription of C1QBP, thereby regulating glutamine metabolism (45). In malignant brain cancer, a high level of Myc is accompanied by an increase in C1QBP expression (59,60). Research indicates the proto-oncogene c-Myc directly regulates C1QBP expression at the transcriptional level. First identified in cholangiocarcinoma, this mechanism involves c-Myc binding to the C1QBP promoter to activate its transcription, subsequently driving tumor proliferation (45). The mitochondrial dysfunction of C1QBP is closely related to cancer progression. For example, in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), targeting C1QBP can induce mitochondrial damage and tumor regression; its expression level is related to the prognosis of patients, making it a potential target for cancer treatment (41). Studies have shown that C1QBP is highly expressed in gynecological tumor tissues and may be used as a biomarker to predict the progression and prognosis of gynecologic tumors (3-5). However, few studies have investigated the specific mechanism of C1QBP in gynecological tumors, and the role of C1QBP in these tumor types requires further experimental and clinical validation.
Furthermore, C1QBP has been demonstrated to be associated with mitochondrial-dependent tumor cell apoptosis. Knockdown of C1QBP enhances mitochondrial fragmentation, accompanied by the loss of detectable levels of mitochondrial fusion intermediates Mitofusin1/2(53). Proteasome activator and C1QBP are co-localized in mitochondria and promote mitochondrial fusion by upregulating optic atrophy 1, Mitofusin1/2, respiratory complex expression, OXPHOS, ATP production and ROS generation. Mitochondria are highly dynamic organelles that constantly undergo division and fusion (61,62).
C1QBP is related to the immune process during the occurrence and development of tumors, such as the regulation of T cells and macrophages, as well as the proliferation and invasion of tumors (52,58,59). Studies have shown that C1QBP also participates in regulating the differentiation of effector CD8+ T cells, thereby influencing their antiviral and antitumor immune responses (56,63,64). In immune cells, the absence of C1QBP intrinsically inhibits effector CD8+ T cell differentiation by impairing mitochondrial respiratory capacity and increasing sensitivity to defective OXPHOS, leading to metabolic reprogramming, epigenetic disorders and a subsequent disruption of the antitumor immune response (56). Knocking out the C1QBP protein can regulate T cells by impairing mitochondrial fitness, leading to the accumulation of ROS and the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, thereby compromising mitochondrial health and function (56). The absence of C1QBP weakens the infiltration of T cells into tumors and exacerbates the exhaustion of tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes (65,66).
Furthermore, C1QBP is also related to the regulation of macrophages (6). The vitronectin secreted by tumor cells interacts with C1QBP located on the surface of tumor-associated macrophages, inhibiting the phagocytic activity of tumor cells and causing the macrophages to transform into the M2 subtype in the tumor microenvironment (67). Mechanistically, the vitronectin-C1QBP axis promotes Shp1 uptake induced by FcyRIIIA/CD16, thereby reducing the phosphorylation of Syk (67). This reduction in Syk phosphorylation impairs downstream phagocytic signaling, ultimately inhibiting the phagocytic activity of macrophages against tumor cells. Tumor cell-derived vitronectin (Vin) suppresses phagocytosis through its interaction with C1QBP on the macrophage surface (63). Moreover, the combination of Vin knockdown and the anti-CD47 antibody effectively enhances the phagocytic activity and infiltration of macrophages, thereby reducing tumor growth in vivo. Further studies have shown that C1QBP may promote the polarization of macrophages from macrophages to M2 and M3 types (67,68). Mitochondrial function not only affects the occurrence, progression and distant metastasis of tumors, but also regulates the maturation, differentiation and long-term maintenance of immune cells.
The secreted form of C1QBP can upregulate the expression of the inducible bradykinin receptor I through autocrine action, thereby exacerbating vascular leakage and opening channels within the cells, allowing tumor cells to escape and metastasize to distant sites for metastatic invasion (6,69). Proliferating tumor cells rely on angiogenesis to maintain survival, development and escape to secondary sites for metastatic invasion. Multiple studies have confirmed that the hypoxic tumor microenvironment plays a role in promoting angiogenesis (27,70-72). The expression level of C1QBP is higher in the hypoxic regions of tumors, indicating that the tumor microenvironment is associated with the expression level and function of C1QBP in cancer (34). Additionally, hypoxia induces an increase in the C1QBP expression level in TNBC cells through the hypoxia-inducible factor α transcription factor (69,73). The neutralizing effect of anti-C1QBP antibodies on C1QBP located on the cell surface also inhibits angiogenesis, as this anti-C1QBP antibody prevents the activation of receptor tyrosine kinase stimulated by growth factors, the formation of pseudopodia, cell migration and the formation of capillary tubes (74).
The incidence of cervical cancer has declined slightly over the past decade, but it remains the second most common cause of cancer-related death among women in developing countries (75). The primary causative agent of cervical cancer is oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV), of which HPV 16 and HPV 18 are predominant (76). Identifying genes involved in cervical carcinogenesis and progression may help elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms and provide valuable therapeutic targets.
Current research progress on cervical cancer and C1QBP has conflicting results. Some studies have shown that C1QBP is associated with the promotion of cervical cancer development, while others have indicated that C1QBP is related to the inhibition of cervical cancer. Zhang et al (3) first reported that C1QBP is upregulated in cervical tumor tissues and that the degree of elevated expression is associated with advanced international Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage (P=0.001), poor histological grade (P=0.013), large tumor volume (P=0.025), lymphatic vessel interstitial infiltration (P=0.024), deep interstitial infiltration (P=0.001) and lymph node metastasis (P=0.023). This study also demonstrated that elevated C1QBP expression is an independent predictor of disease-free survival (P=0.007) in patients with cervical cancer via multivariate Cox regression analysis. Due to insufficient sample size, more experimental results should be obtained with larger sample sizes in future to obtain more representative conclusions.
Conversely, another study has shown that, compared with normal cervical tissue, the expression of C1QBP protein in human cervical squamous cell carcinoma tissue is significantly decreased (3). C1QBP is associated with the apoptosis, survival, migration and proliferation of cervical squamous cell carcinoma cells (3). Relevant pathways have also been explored in existing studies. After transfection of C33a cells with the C1QBP overexpression vector, the apoptosis rate and the expression of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38 MAPK) significantly increased. Moreover, when C1QBP was overexpressed, the changes in the survival rate, migration ability and proliferation ability of C33a cells could be eliminated with the p38 MAPK inhibitor SB202190(77). Chen et al (78) reported that when C1QBP is overexpressed, Ca2+ overload in mitochondria, increased ROS and decreased mitochondrial membrane potential lead to reduced cell viability, which leads to the induction of apoptosis, confirming the involvement of C1QBP in the p53-dependent apoptotic pathway. Moreover, the involvement of C1QBP in inducing apoptosis in cervical cancer cells via another pathway, p38 MAPK/JNK, was also identified in a study by Gao et al (79). Itahana and Zhang (80) and Liu et al (81) also reported that apoptosis was increased when C1QBP was overexpressed in cervical tumor tissues. These data indicate that C1QBP inhibits the survival, migration and proliferation of cervical squamous cell carcinoma cells through the p38 MAPK signaling pathway (79).
A persistent infection of high-risk HPV type has been correlated with the development of cervical cancer (78). The HPV 16 genome is composed of six regulatory proteins, composed of E1, E2, E4, E5, E6 and E7, which regulate the life cycle, gene expression and the function of cervical cancer. HPV 16 E2 induces the apoptosis of tumor cells and inhibits tumor growth in cervical cancer by increasing the expression of C1QBP. Compared with non-cancerous cervical samples, the expression levels of the HPV-16 E2 and C1QBP genes were significantly decreased in human cervical squamous cell carcinoma samples (78). In C33a and SiHa cells transfected with a vector encoding HPV-16 E2, the expression of the C1QBP gene significantly increased, which was accompanied by mitochondrial dysfunction and the upregulation of apoptosis; transfecting with C1QBP small interfering RNA (siRNA) could limit these phenomena. These data support a mechanism in which C1QBP plays an important role in the HPV-16 E2-induced apoptosis of human cervical squamous cell carcinoma cells through a mitochondrial-dependent pathway (78). The C33a and SiHa cells transfected with the HPV16 E2 vector also showed a significant increase in the activation of p38 MAPK/JNK. Moreover, the changes in the survival rate, migration ability and proliferation ability of C33a cells after HPV 16 E2 transfection were eliminated after treatment with the p38 MAPK inhibitor SB203580 and the JNK inhibitor SP600125. These data support the mechanism that HPV16 E2 induces cell apoptosis by silencing the C1QBP gene or inhibiting the p38 MAPK/JNK signaling pathway in cervical squamous cell carcinoma (78). Another study revealed that HPV E2 could induce apoptosis in cervical cancer cells through the upregulation of C1QBP (81).
The E6 and E7 proteins encoded by high-risk HPV types are also associated with the function of C1QBP in cervical cancer, and their functions are different from those of the aforementioned E2 type. Under the influence of the E6 and E7 proteins encoded by high-risk HPV, C1QBP promotes the immune escape of cervical cancer cells (79). Gao et al (79) examined C1QBP protein levels in C-33A cells transfected with or without the HPV-16 E6 and E7 oncogenes and reported that C1QBP protein expression was significantly lower in HPV-16 E6- and E7-treated C-33A cells than in untreated C-33A cells. The excessive expression of C1QBP in cells induces apoptosis, mediated by the activation of caspase-3 and the onset of mitochondrial dysfunction. Cells transfected with the GFP-C1QBP vector showed increased expression of C1QBP protein and a gradual increase in ROS production. Additionally, the increase in ROS production and Ca2+ influx in mitochondria led to the loss of mitochondrial transmembrane potential. Notably, when C1QBP was overexpressed in C-33A cells and the cells were treated with metformin, cell apoptosis was significantly inhibited, which may be due to the protection of mitochondrial function by metformin (79). These data suggest that C1QBP may play an important role in the immune escape of cervical cancer triggered by HPV-16 E6 and E7, depending on its expression level and cellular subcellular localization. Specifically, E6 and E7 downregulate C1QBP expression, thereby relieving its pro-apoptotic effect, which is mediated by caspase-3 activation, ROS production and mitochondrial dysfunction. This suppression of C1QBP-dependent apoptosis allows HPV-infected cells to evade immune clearance and persist, contributing to cervical carcinogenesis. Rangsee et al (13) reported that HPV-E7 can also inhibit C1QBP by increasing C1QBP promoter methylation in HPV-positive cervical cancer cell lines and decreasing its protein abundance, which ultimately promotes cervical carcinogenesis. HPV-16 is closely associated with the occurrence of 50% of cervical cancer cases (79).
In summary, C1QBP is associated with the apoptosis, survival, migration and proliferation of cervical squamous cell carcinoma cells. There is a close link between HPV-related proteins and C1QBP. C1QBP has context-dependent conflicting roles in HPV-associated cervical cancer, functioning as an anti-tumorigenic factor in the presence of HPV E2 and as a pro-tumorigenic factor in the presence of high-risk HPV E6 and E7 oncogenes. These findings provide new ideas for the identification of new therapeutic targets for the treatment of human cervical cancer. However, the specific mechanism involved is still unclear and needs to be further verified by a number of basic experiments. Besides, although previous cervical cancer-related studies have analyzed cervical cancer samples, the statistical power of stratified analyses, such as different histological types or clinical stages, may be insufficient, which leads to the results being susceptible to confounding factors and difficulties verifying their universality. The clinical significance of C1QBP in cervical cancer is mostly based on data from single centers, lacking independent multi-center cohort verification. Moreover, the application of functional experiments in cervical cancer cell lines is limited, which restricts the ability of causal inference. At present, experiments have been largely limited to a few cell lines, such as C-33A and SiHa, making it difficult to generalize the conclusions to cervical cancer of all HPV subtypes and genetic backgrounds. Besides, the inconsistent results of C1QBP in cervical cancer research may be caused by small sample size, different population characteristics, inconsistent tissue preservation methods, differences in detection methods, data collection biases, short follow-up time or insufficient control of confounding factors. At present, there are relatively few studies examining the mechanistic pathways and clinical research between C1QBP and cervical cancer; therefore, further research and discussion are needed.
Among the gynecological malignancies, ovarian cancer is the most common cause of death (82). Despite patients receiving advanced tumor cytoreduction and chemotherapy, 5-year survival rates still remain low. The use of multiple biomarkers is an accurate method for preoperatively predicting the risk of ovarian cancer in patients with metastases. Therefore, testing for new biomarkers may improve the sensitivity and specificity of predicting disease.
Yu et al (4) reported that C1QBP upregulation in epithelial ovarian cancer was associated with FIGO stage (P=0.0074), peritoneal dissemination (P<0.0001), lymph node metastasis (P<0.0001), degree of tissue differentiation (P<0.0001) and residual tumor size (P=0.0013). They collected paraffin-embedded specimens from 161 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and found that C1QBP was lowly expressed in benign ovarian tissues via western blot analysis. Low levels of C1QBP expression were also detected in the tissues of patients without peritoneal and lymph node metastasis; however, high levels were detected in the tissues of patients with peritoneal and lymph node metastasis. The same results were confirmed by immunohistochemical staining. Moreover, within the same patients, the intensity and frequency of C1QBP staining increased from the primary lesion to peritoneal dissemination and lymph node metastasis. Therefore, it was noted that elevated C1QBP expression may be a new indicator of lymph node and peritoneal metastasis in patients with EOC. Besides, regarding the differences in expression and function of C1QBP in different pathological subtypes such as serous ovarian cancer and endometrioid ovarian cancer, current research is limited and there are no published data for reference. This is also a promising research direction.
In a study by Yu et al (83), C1QBP was found to be only weakly to non-expressed in all normal ovarian tissues, highly expressed in plasmacytoid ovarian cancer tissues, more highly expressed in poorly differentiated plasmacytoid ovarian cancer tissues than in moderately differentiated ovarian cancers (P=0.0182) and significantly elevated in patients with lymph node metastasis (P=0.0021). Univariate analysis revealed that C1QBP upregulation was a significant predictor of poor progression-free survival and overall survival (83). Due to limitations such as insufficient sample size and the regional nature of sample collection, the reliability of these findings needs to be further validated in larger, multi-center cohorts.
Duan et al (84) have designed a novel C1QBP probe based on 99mTc-radiolabeled siRNA, which can non-invasively detect C1QBP expression in vivo, thus enabling the early diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Hunt et al (85) also reported that C1QBP can be inhibited by the intraperitoneal injection of linTT1 peptide-guided proapoptotic nanoparticles to treat peritoneal metastatic cancer caused by ovarian cancer dissemination.
Moreover, C1QBP also has a role in the drug resistance of ovarian cancer cells. Yu et al (4) reported that the expression of C1QBP was increased in cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer and that the staining intensity and frequency in chemotherapy-resistant ovarian tumor tissues were significantly greater than that in chemotherapy-sensitive ovarian tumor tissues.
In conclusion, C1QBP is closely related to lymph and lesion metastasis in ovarian cancer, which is a research direction that can be further explored in the future. Further studies are needed to confirm whether the C1QBP protein has the potential to serve as a predictive marker for the clinical progression of ovarian cancer alone or in combination with other markers. In addition, the detailed mechanism by which increased C1QBP expression leads to ovarian cancer metastasis still remains unclear and should be further explored in future basic studies and clinical trials.
The incidence of endometrial cancer has been increasing worldwide in recent year (86). In total, 80% of endometrial cancer cases are estrogen-related and the pathological type is predominantly endometrioid, with early-stage patients tending to have an improved prognosis and patients with advanced, recurrent or high-grade lesions having a poor prognosis (87,88). However, few therapeutic agents are available to achieve durable remission in patients with recurrent or advanced disease. Therefore, developing novel molecular biomarkers that may be involved in the molecular mechanisms of endometrial carcinogenesis and progression is imperative.
Rubinstein et al (89) examined C1QBP expression in endometrial cancer via immunohistochemical staining and reported that no significant differential expression of C1QBP was detected compared with non-malignant tissues of the same histology. However, another study noted that, compared with normal endometrium, C1QBP was more highly expressed in endometrial cancer and endometrial benign lesions and that the expression of C1QBP in endometrial carcinoma was significantly greater than that in endometrial benign lesions. In the study, high C1QBP expression was significantly associated with advanced International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage (P=0.019), high histological grade (P<0.001), deep myometrial infiltration (P=0.013), lymphatic vessel interstitial infiltration (P=0.010), lymph node metastasis (P=0.015) and recurrence (P=0.009). The results of the multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the C1QBP expression status was an independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival (P=0.022) and overall survival (P=0.025) in patients with endometrial cancer (5). Due to the limitations of the sample size and its single-region nature, further research is needed to reach a more definite conclusion. The research on C1QBP in endometrial cancer may have a relatively small sample size and insufficient statistical power, which limits the generalizability of the results. Moreover, if the data comes from a single medical institution, it may not be representative of the heterogeneity of a multi-center population. The results may not be representative of other populations with different environmental exposures. Therefore, large-scale, multi-center studies with diverse geographic cohorts are warranted to validate the independent prognostic value of C1QBP in endometrial cancer. Furthermore, since the patient groups were formed based on historical data rather than random allocation, the baseline characteristics, such as age, molecular subtype and treatment regimen, may be unbalanced, which could potentially confound the effect estimation. Comorbidities, treatment intensity or hormone receptor status may lead to the association between C1QBP and the outcome being partially attributed to unmeasured factors.
There are similar pathological and physiological connections among obesity, diabetes and endometrial cancer. The occurrence of endometrial cancer is related to factors such as hormonal level changes, metabolic abnormalities and chronic inflammation. Obese women have higher levels of estrogen in their bodies, which may stimulate the abnormal proliferation of endometrial cancer cells (85). Endometrial cancer also has an association with hypertension, mainly related to the shared metabolic abnormalities such as obesity and insulin resistance (90-92). The long-term chronic inflammation and hormone imbalance in the body of patients with hypertension may indirectly increase the risk of endometrial cancer, but the specific mechanism still needs further research (93). Moreover, women who experience menopause later in life have a relatively higher risk of endometrial cancer (94). The mechanism of endometrial cancer and C1QBP protein is still poorly understood at present. It is well established that estrogen and metabolic disorders are risk factors for endometrial cancer, and that C1QBP plays a central role in mitochondrial metabolism and tumorigenesis (95,96). Moreover, indirect evidence suggests that estrogen can regulate C1q, the primary ligand of C1QBP (97-99). Estrogen signaling and metabolic disorders such as obesity and diabetes may be associated with the potential role of C1QBP in the occurrence of endometrial cancer; however, there are no direct experimental data to support this conclusion at present and it should be regarded as a knowledge gap. Diabetes is an important risk factor for endometrial cancer in women and it has a negative impact on the survival rate and prognosis of patients. Molecular mechanisms such as the insulin-like growth factor family, oxidative stress and inflammatory cytokines have been considered to explain this relationship (100). C1QBP is involved in the regulation of OXPHOS and glucose oxidation (16). The absence of C1QBP is associated with resistance to age-related and diet-induced obesity (101). C1QBP promotes lipid biosynthesis by regulating fatty acid-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress (16,101). C1QBP interacts with the endoplasmic reticulum-anchored enzyme mannosyl-oligosaccharide glucosidase I (MOGS) (100,102). We hypothesize that the C1QBP-MOGS interaction represents a novel mitochondria-endoplasmic reticulum coordination mechanism, enabling cells to synchronize energy production (via mitochondrial OXPHOS) with protein synthesis and folding (via endoplasmic reticulum glycosylation). This coordination is particularly critical in rapidly proliferating endometrial cancer cells, which require both robust energy supply from mitochondria and extensive protein production from the endoplasmic reticulum. The findings highlight important directions for future research aimed at elucidating the precise molecular mechanisms by which C1QBP exerts its diverse biological functions. Few studies have explored the relationship between endometrial cancer and C1QBP and numerous basic studies are needed to further demonstrate the association between C1QBP and endometrial cancer and its specific molecular mechanisms.
C1QBP, as a key protein highly expressed in various types of cancer, has demonstrated potential in clinical applications as a diagnostic biomarker, prognostic predictor and therapeutic target. C1QBP is involved in the occurrence, progression, metastasis and prognosis of cancer and can also be used as a molecular target for cancer treatment (32,103). C1QBP is upregulated in various tumor tissues and its high expression level is significantly associated with poor prognosis in patients. For instance, in oral squamous cell carcinoma, the expression levels of C1QBP and PA28y are positively correlated and their high co-expression indicates a poor prognosis (104). Additionally, the mRNA expression level of C1QBP is significantly higher in TNBC tissues than normal tissues and its high expression is associated with a shortened disease-free survival period (105). Moreover, a C1QBP expression change may serve as an indicator of disease progression. For instance, in pancreatic cancer, the level of the exosomal CD44v6/C1QB complex can predict the risk of liver metastasis (40). Furthermore, C1QBP can also serve as an indicator for peritoneal and lymph node metastasis in EOC. In a previous study, among the 89 patients whose primary tumor immunohistochemical staining showed high expression levels of C1QBP, 95.5% had peritoneal metastasis and 48.3% had lymph node metastasis (12). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that upregulation of C1QBP was associated with peritoneal dissemination and lymph node metastasis in EOC.
C1QBP plays a crucial role in DNA damage repair. For instance, in breast cancer, C1QBP regulates homologous combination repair by stabilizing the MRE11 protein (41). C1QBP inhibition can enhance the efficacy of chemotherapy, a mechanism that provides a new approach for overcoming drug resistance. For example, combining a C1QBP inhibitor with DNA damage drugs may improve the therapeutic effect (106). Additionally, the role of C1QBP in metabolic regulation, such as mitochondrial OXPHOS, suggests that its targeted therapy may be applicable to tumors that are metabolically dependent. C1QBP, frequently upregulated in cancer, is secreted into the tumor microenvironment where it drives metastatic progression via the complement and kinin systems. Furthermore, C1QBP participates in a novel immune checkpoint axis; cancer cell-surface C1QBP directly interacts with cytotoxic T cells to suppress their activity, analogous to the established programmed cell death ligand 1 and programmed cell death protein 1 pathway (6).
Due to limitations such as insufficient sample size and the regional nature of sample collection, subsequent researchers can improve the experimental conclusion by increasing the sample size. According to existing research, the high immunohistochemical expression of C1QBP can serve as an indicator of poor prognosis for ovarian, cervical and endometrial cancer (3-5). Measuring the level of C1QBP in serum or abdominal fluid may be used for early diagnosis or recurrence monitoring. PDBAG1, a peptide derived from the precursor protein of glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 1, can directly bind to C1QBP and induce its ubiquitin-dependent degradation (43). In the TNBC model, PDBAG1 significantly inhibits tumor growth and induces regression (100). The LyP-1 peptide can specifically bind to C1QBP on the surface of tumor cells and be used for drug delivery (107). Additionally, the green tea polyphenol epigallocatechin gallate can bind to C1QBP and inhibit tumor growth (58). In addition, as a research target, anti-C1QBP monoclonal antibodies are currently being developed to block its tumor-promoting functions. C1QBP inhibitors combined with chemotherapy, such as paclitaxel and cisplatin, may reverse drug resistance. Studies have demonstrated the feasibility of the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell immunotherapy approach in glioblastoma (108-110). C1QBP is highly expressed on the surface of tumor cells and can be used as a target antigen for immunotherapy, such as CAR-T and peptide vaccines. At present, there are no direct CAR-T products targeting C1QBP that have been approved. However, given its central role in T-cell metabolism, enhancing the function of C1QBP or maintaining mitochondrial health may become a strategy to overcome drug resistance. Besides, at present, no C1QBP-based diagnostic or therapeutic applications have entered clinical trials.
C1QBP is expressed in multiple intracellular locations such as mitochondria, cytoplasm and cell membranes, and its structural characteristics provide binding sites for small molecule or peptide drugs. Regarding tumor specificity, C1QBP is highly expressed in various tumor types, such as TNBC, oral squamous cell carcinoma and acute myeloid leukemia, but is expressed at a lower level in normal tissues (34,65,104). For instance, the mRNA level of C1QBP in TNBC is significantly higher than that in adjacent normal tissues, and its high expression is associated with poor patient prognosis (34). This differential expression may support the selectivity toxicity of targeted therapy. Regarding the safety and toxicity of C1QBP drugs, current studies show that targeting C1QBP has acceptable safety in animal models (43,100). For example, PDBAG1 inhibits the growth of TNBC tumors without reporting significant toxicity (43). However, C1QBP participates in basic metabolic functions such as mitochondrial homeostasis in normal cells and the potential toxicity needs further evaluation. The overall safety of C1QBP-targeted drugs, involving preclinical toxicity, clinical safety and the therapeutic window, still need to be verified through preclinical and clinical trials.
The present review summarized the research progress of C1QBP in cervical, ovarian and endometrial cancer (Fig. 3). Early gynecological tumors often have no notable symptoms or signs, but serum tumor markers, such as the now familiar biomarkers CA125 and HE4, are elevated to varying degrees (111,112). Tumor-related markers have important guiding significance for the early screening of gynecological tumors, adjuvant diagnosis, localization and diagnosis, therapeutic efficacy evaluation, prognosis assessment and targeted therapies. Numerous studies have demonstrated the potential of targeting C1QBP to treat various tumor types (6,43,65,82,113). C1QBP affects the proliferation and metastasis of gynecological tumors and has a certain impact on drug resistance. However, the future of C1QBP in clinical use as a diagnostic and prognostic marker for gynecological tumors still needs further basic experiments and clinical trials for verification.
Research on the role of C1QBP in gynecological tumors is still in its initial stage and there are several unresolved controversies and major research gaps. Firstly, there are disputes regarding the expression and function of C1QBP in gynecological tumors. For instance, in cervical cancer, the expression level of the homologous subunit of C1QBP is related to tumor progression, but the specific mechanism is still unclear and the evidence is limited. Additionally, the expression pattern and clinical significance of C1QBP in other gynecological tumors, such as ovarian and cervical cancer, have not been systematically studied. Different studies have differing opinions on whether C1QBP can serve as an independent prognostic marker. For example, in TNBC, high expression of C1QBP is associated with poor prognosis, but similar validation is lacking in gynecological tumors. Secondly, the molecular mechanism of C1QBP in gynecological tumors has not been elucidated. Studies have shown that C1QBP promotes tumor progression by regulating mitochondrial function, but the applicability of this mechanism in gynecological tumors is unknown. Therapeutic strategies targeting C1QBP face challenges. Although a peptide inhibitor, PDBAG1, has been found to inhibit tumors by inducing C1QBP degradation in breast cancer, the feasibility of this strategy in gynecological tumors is unknown and there is currently a lack of validation of the targeted effect in gynecological tumor-specific models. Moreover, the limitations of current research methods and data restrict progress. Current evidence mostly originates from retrospective cohorts or public databases, with small sample sizes and a lack of multicenter validation.
C1QBP may promote viral replication by inhibiting immune responses. For example, both hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus can inhibit or destroy T cells via C1QBP, thus suppressing the body's immune response (84). The known causative virus of cervical cancer is HPV, and it is not clear whether there is a pathogenic effect between HPV and C1QBP similar to that between HIV and HCV with C1QBP. HPV-associated proteins influence cervical cancer development by affecting C1QBP. However, the exact mechanism needs to be further explored. C1QBP maintains OXPHOS and its absence increases glycolysis while impairing cell proliferation in vitro and tumor growth in vivo (114). In addition, mitochondria seem to play an intermediary role between C1QBP and gynecological tumors and it has been shown that C1QBP affects gynecological tumor development by regulating mitochondrial biogenesis and metabolic processes (16). Thus, the use of mitochondrion-targeted anticancer drugs mediated by C1QBP may constitute a novel strategy for treating gynecological tumors in the future. C1QBP may also be a potential molecular marker for diagnosing gynecological tumors and a new indicator for predicting the prognosis of this disease. Although C1QBP is highly expressed in most tumor tissues, whether it can be used as a predictive marker for the clinical progression of gynecologic tumors, either alone or in combination with other markers, needs to be confirmed by further studies.
C1QBP is a multifunctional protein that plays a crucial role in mitochondrial function, cellular metabolism and tumor progression. In the field of gynecological tumors, the research on C1QBP is still in its early stages. Future studies on C1QBP should focus on its molecular mechanisms and diagnostic and therapeutic potential while combining multidisciplinary techniques and cross-disciplinary collaborations to promote the translational application of C1QBP in gynecological oncology. These studies will not only help elucidate the pathogenesis of gynecological tumors in detail but may also provide an essential basis for the development of new diagnostic methods and therapeutic strategies. The main research focus in the future should be concentrated on the following aspects: i) Mechanism exploration: Deeply analyze the regulatory mechanisms of C1QBP in mitochondrial dynamics such as fusion and fission balance, OXPHOS activity and metabolic pathways in gynecological tumor cells, especially its role in chemotherapy resistance and the tumor microenvironment; ii) clinical relevance analysis: Through databases such as The Cancer Genome Atlas and clinical cohorts, the correlation between the expression level of C1QBP and the prognosis of patients with gynecological tumors (such as in terms of disease-free survival) should be clarified and its potential as a biomarker should be evaluated; and iii) targeted strategy development: Explore molecular tools for direct targeting of C1QBP, such as peptide inhibitors or small molecule compounds, and draw on the strategy of PDBAG1 in TNBC research, which inhibits tumors by inducing the degradation of C1QBP, to optimize their applicability in gynecological tumor models. The transformation from basic research to clinical application needs to be carried out step-by-step: i) Based on the structural characteristics of C1QBP, such as the N-terminal functional domain, specific inhibitors can be discovered through high-throughput screening or computational simulation, and their killing effects on gynecological tumor cell lines and organoid models can be evaluated; ii) combining C1QBP-targeted drugs with existing therapies such as chemotherapy, poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors or immunotherapy, to overcome drug resistance and improve efficacy, for example, by inhibiting mitochondrial function to enhance oxidative stress-induced cancer cell death; and iii) early clinical trials should be prioritized in gynecological tumors with active mitochondrial metabolism, such as ovarian cancer, while establishing biomarker detection methods to screen potential patient groups that may benefit.
Not applicable.
Funding: This work was supported by the Sichuan Science and Technology Program, China (grant no. 2022ZHYZ0012).
Not applicable.
HZ contributed to conceptualization, writing the original draft, reviewing and editing the manuscript and visualization by designing and creating the mechanistic figures. JF contributed to reviewing and editing the manuscript and supervision. XZ, BL, TG and FF contributed to reviewing the manuscript and supervision. JL contributed to reviewing the manuscript, resources, supervision, funding acquisition and project administration. PZ contributed to editing the manuscript, resources, supervision and funding acquisition. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript. Data authentication is not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
|
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A and Bray F: Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 71:209–249. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Qiu H, Cao S and Xu R: Cancer incidence, mortality, and burden in China: A time-trend analysis and comparison with the United States and United Kingdom based on the global epidemiological data released in 2020. Cancer Commun (Lond). 41:1037–1048. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Zhang M, Li N, Liang Y, Liu J, Zhou Y and Liu C: Hyaluronic acid binding protein 1 overexpression is an indicator for disease-free survival in cervical cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 22:347–352. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Yu H, Liu Q, Xin T, Xing L, Dong G, Jiang Q, Lv Y, Song X, Teng C, Huang D, et al: Elevated expression of hyaluronic acid binding protein 1 (HABP1)/P32/C1QBP is a novel indicator for lymph node and peritoneal metastasis of epithelial ovarian cancer patients. Tumour Biol. 34:3981–3987. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Zhao J, Liu T, Yu G and Wang J: Overexpression of HABP1 correlated with clinicopathological characteristics and unfavorable prognosis in endometrial cancer. Tumour Biol. 36:1299–1306. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Ghebrehiwet B, Zaniewski M, Fernandez A, DiGiovanni M, Reyes TN, Ji P, Savitt AG, Williams JL, Seeliger MA and Peerschke EIB: The C1q and gC1qR axis as a novel checkpoint inhibitor in cancer. Front Immunol. 15(1351656)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Wang Q, Chai D, Sobhani N, Sun N, Neeli P, Zheng J and Tian H: C1QBP regulates mitochondrial plasticity to impact tumor progression and antitumor immune response. Front Physiol. 13(1012112)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Ghebrehiwet B, Lim BL, Peerschke EI and Reid KB: Isolation, cDNA cloning, and overexpression of a 33-kD cell surface glycoprotein that binds to the globular ‘heads’ of C1q. J Exp Med. 179:1809–1821. 1994.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
George SA, Kotapalli V, Ramaswamy P, Kumar R, Gowrishankar S, Uppin SG and Bashyam MD: Novel oncogenic transcriptional targets of mutant p53 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Cell Biochem. 125(e30534)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Guo N, Weremowicz S, Lynch N, Lim BL, Schwaeble W, Peerschke EI, Morton CC, Reid KB, Ghebrehiwet B and Sastry KN: Assignment of C1QBP encoding the C1q globular domain binding protein (gC1q-R) to human chromosome 17 band p13.3 by in situ hybridization. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 77:283–284. 1997.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Jiang J, Zhang Y, Krainer AR and Xu R: Crystal structure of human p32, a doughnut-shaped acidic mitochondrial matrix protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 96:3572–3577. 1999.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Ghebrehiwet B, Geisbrecht BV, Xu X, Savitt AG and Peerschke EIB: The C1q receptors: Focus on gC1qR/p33 (C1qBP, p32, HABP-1)1. Semin Immunol. 45(101338)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Rangsee N, Yanatatsaneejit P, Pisitkun T, Somparn P, Jintaridth P and Topanurak S: Host proteome linked to HPV E7-mediated specific gene hypermethylation in cancer pathways. Infect Agent Cancer. 15(7)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Sengupta A, Banerjee B, Tyagi RK and Datta K: Golgi localization and dynamics of hyaluronan binding protein 1. Cell Res. 15:183–186. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Hu M, Crawford SA, Henstridge DC, Ng IH, Boey EJ, Xu Y, Febbraio MA, Jans DA and Bogoyevitch MA: p32 protein levels are integral to mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum morphology, cell metabolism and survival. Biochem J. 453:381–391. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Fogal V, Richardson AD, Karmali PP, Scheffler IE, Smith JW and Ruoslahti E: Mitochondrial p32 protein is a critical regulator of tumor metabolism via maintenance of oxidative phosphorylation. Mol Cell Biol. 30:1303–1318. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Gotoh K, Morisaki T, Setoyama D, Sasaki K, Yagi M, Igami K, Mizuguchi S, Uchiumi T, Fukui Y and Kang D: Mitochondrial p32/C1qbp is a critical regulator of dendritic cell metabolism and maturation. Cell Rep. 25:1800–1815.e1804. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Dempsey PW, Allison ME, Akkaraju S, Goodnow CC and Fearon DT: C3d of complement as a molecular adjuvant: Bridging innate and acquired immunity. Science. 271:348–350. 1996.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Botto M, Dell'Agnola C, Bygrave AE, Thompson EM, Cook HT, Petry F, Loos M, Pandolfi PP and Walport MJ: Homozygous C1q deficiency causes glomerulonephritis associated with multiple apoptotic bodies. Nat Genet. 19:56–59. 1998.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Muta T, Kang D, Kitajima S, Fujiwara T and Hamasaki N: p32 protein, a splicing factor 2-associated protein, is localized in mitochondrial matrix and is functionally important in maintaining oxidative phosphorylation. J Biol Chem. 272:24363–24370. 1997.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Krainer A, Mayeda A, Kozak D and Binns G: Functional expression of cloned human splicing factor SF2-homology to RNA-binding proteins, U1 70K, and Drosophila splicing regulators. Cell. 66:383–394. 1991.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Honor B, Madsena P, Rasmusserf HH, Vandekerckhove J, Celis JE and Leffers H: Cloning and expression of a cDNA covering the complete coding region of the P32 subunit of human pre-mRNA splicing factor SF2. Gene. 134:283–287. 1993.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Peerschke EI, Petrovan RJ, Ghebrehiwet B and Ruf W: Tissue factor pathway inhibitor-2 (TFPI-2) recognizes the complement and kininogen binding protein gC1qR/p33 (gC1qR): Implications for vascular inflammation. Thromb Haemost. 92:811–819. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Xu L, Xiao N, Liu F, Ren H and Gu J: Inhibition of RIG-I and MDA5-dependent antiviral response by gC1qR at mitochondria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 106:1530–1535. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Song K, Wu Y, Fu B, Wang L, Hao W, Hua F, Sun Y, Dorf ME and Li S: Leaked mitochondrial C1QBP inhibits activation of the DNA sensor cGAS. J Immunol. 207:2155–2166. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Biswas AK, Hafiz A, Banerjee B, Kim KS, Datta K and Chitnis CE: Plasmodium falciparum uses gC1qR/HABP1/p32 as a receptor to bind to vascular endothelium and for platelet-mediated clumping. PLoS Pathog. 3:1271–1280. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Egusquiza-Alvarez CA and Robles-Flores M: An approach to p32/gC1qR/HABP1: A multifunctional protein with an essential role in cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 148:1831–1854. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Feng X, Tonnesen MG, Peerschke EI and Ghebrehiwet B: Cooperation of C1q receptors and integrins in C1q-mediated endothelial cell adhesion and spreading. J Immunol. 168:2441–2448. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Deb TB and Datta K: Molecular cloning of human fibroblast hyaluronic acid-binding protein confirms its identity with P-32, a protein co-purified with splicing factor SF2. Hyaluronic acid-binding protein as P-32 protein, co-purified with splicing factor SF2. J Biol Chem. 271:2206–2212. 1996.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Petersen-Mahrt SK, Estmer C, Ohrmalm C, Matthews DA, Russell WC and Akusjärvi G: The splicing factor-associated protein, p32, regulates RNA splicing by inhibiting ASF/SF2 RNA binding and phosphorylation. EMBO J. 18:1014–1024. 1999.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Shi H, Fang W, Liu M and Fu D: Complement component 1, q subcomponent binding protein (C1QBP) in lipid rafts mediates hepatic metastasis of pancreatic cancer by regulating IGF-1/IGF-1R signaling. Int J Cancer. 141:1389–1401. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Wang Z, Sun A, Yan A, Yao J, Huang H, Gao Z, Han T, Gu J, Li N, Wu H and Li K: Circular RNA MTCL1 promotes advanced laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma progression by inhibiting C1QBP ubiquitin degradation and mediating beta-catenin activation. Mol Cancer. 21(92)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Ma J, Ren C, Yang H, Zhao J, Wang F and Wan Y: The expression pattern of p32 in sheep muscle and its role in differentiation, cell proliferation, and apoptosis of myoblasts. Int J Mol Sci. 20(5161)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Wu H, Chu Y, Sun S, Li G, Xu S, Zhang X, Jiang Y, Gao S, Wang Q, Zhang J and Pang D: Hypoxia-mediated complement 1q binding protein regulates metastasis and chemoresistance in triple-negative breast cancer and modulates the PKC-NF-κB-VCAM-1 signaling pathway. Front Cell Dev Biol. 9(607142)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Sünderhauf A, Hicken M, Schlichting H, Skibbe K, Ragab M, Raschdorf A, Hirose M, Schäffler H, Bokemeyer A, Bettenworth D, et al: Loss of Mucosal p32/gC1qR/HABP1 triggers energy deficiency and impairs goblet cell differentiation in ulcerative colitis. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 12:229–250. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Kaul R, Saha P, Saradhi M, Prasad RL, Chatterjee S, Ghosh I, Tyagi RK and Datta K: Overexpression of hyaluronan-binding protein 1 (HABP1/p32/gC1qR) in HepG2 cells leads to increased hyaluronan synthesis and cell proliferation by up-regulation of cyclin D1 in AKT-dependent pathway. J Biol Chem. 287:19750–19764. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Egusquiza-Alvarez CA, Moreno-Londoño AP, Alvarado-Ortiz E, Ramos-Godínez MDP, Sarabia-Sánchez MA, Castañeda-Patlán MC and Robles-Flores M: Inhibition of multifunctional protein p32/C1QBP promotes cytostatic effects in colon cancer cells by altering mitogenic signaling pathways and promoting mitochondrial damage. Int J Mol Sci. 25(2712)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Krust B, El Khoury D, Nondier I, Soundaramourty C and Hovanessian AG: Targeting surface nucleolin with multivalent HB-19 and related Nucant pseudopeptides results in distinct inhibitory mechanisms depending on the malignant tumor cell type. BMC Cancer. 11(333)2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Dembitzer FR, Kinoshita Y, Burstein D, Phelps RG, Beasley MB, Garcia R, Harpaz N, Jaffer S, Thung SN, Unger PD, et al: gC1qR expression in normal and pathologic human tissues: differential expression in tissues of epithelial and mesenchymal origin. J Histochem Cytochem. 60:467–474. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Xie Z, Gao Y, Ho C, Li L, Jin C, Wang X, Zou C, Mao Y, Wang X, Li Q, et al: Exosome-delivered CD44v6/C1QBP complex drives pancreatic cancer liver metastasis by promoting fibrotic liver microenvironment. Gut. 71:568–579. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Bai Y, Wang W, Li S, Zhan J, Li H, Zhao M, Zhou XA, Li S, Li X, Huo Y, et al: C1QBP promotes homologous recombination by stabilizing MRE11 and controlling the assembly and activation of MRE11/RAD50/NBS1 complex. Mol Cell. 75:1299–1314.e1296. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Chastney MR, Kaivola J, Leppänen VM and Ivaska J: The role and regulation of integrins in cell migration and invasion. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 26:147–167. 2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Li X, Wu Y, Zhang M, Wang F, Yin H, Zhang Y, Zhao S, Ma J, Lv M and Lu C: A new peptide inhibitor of C1QBP exhibits potent anti-tumour activity against triple negative breast cancer by impairing mitochondrial function and suppressing homologous recombination repair. Clin Transl Med. 15(e70162)2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Kerdidani D, Aerakis E, Verrou KM, Angelidis I, Douka K, Maniou MA, Stamoulis P, Goudevenou K, Prados A, Tzaferis C, et al: Lung tumor MHCII immunity depends on in situ antigen presentation by fibroblasts. J Exp Med. 219(e20210815)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Cheng X, Wang M, Li W, Tian B, Zhang J, Zhang C and Liu P: C1QBP forms a positive feedback loop with the PAICS/FAK/C-MYC axis to promote cancer cell proliferation. Oncogene. 44:4363–4376. 2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Prakash M, Kale S, Ghosh I, Kundu GC and Datta K: Hyaluronan-binding protein 1 (HABP1/p32/gC1qR) induces melanoma cell migration and tumor growth by NF-kappa B dependent MMP-2 activation through integrin α(v)β(3) interaction. Cell Signal. 23:1563–1577. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Yue D, Wang Y, Sun Y, Niu Y and Chang C: C1QBP regulates YBX1 to suppress the androgen receptor (AR)-enhanced RCC cell invasion. Neoplasia. 19:135–144. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Wang Y, Yue D, Xiao M, Qi C, Chen Y, Sun D, Zhang N and Chen R: C1QBP negatively regulates the activation of oncoprotein YBX1 in the renal cell carcinoma as revealed by interactomics analysis. J Proteome Res. 14:804–813. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Leucci E, Vendramin R, Spinazzi M, Laurette P, Fiers M, Wouters J, Radaelli E, Eyckerman S, Leonelli C, Vanderheyden K, et al: Melanoma addiction to the long non-coding RNA SAMMSON. Nature. 531:518–522. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Sinha S, Singh SK, Jangde N, Ray R and Rai V: p32 promotes melanoma progression and metastasis by targeting EMT markers, Akt/PKB pathway, and tumor microenvironment. Cell Death Dis. 12(1012)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Qin X, Kang K, Zhu B, Shi Y and Bu S: C1QBP drives M2 macrophage polarization via TRAF2-CCL2 to promote oral squamous cell carcinoma progression. Int Dent J. 75(103938)2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Zhang S, Wang C, Wang Y, Zhang H, Xu C, Cheng Y, Yuan Y, Sha J, Guo X and Cui Y: A novel protein encoded by circRsrc1 regulates mitochondrial ribosome assembly and translation during spermatogenesis. BMC Biol. 21(94)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Becker YLC, Gagné JP, Julien AS, Lévesque T, Allaeys I, Gougeard N, Rubio V, Boisvert FM, Jean D, Wagner E, et al: Identification of Mitofusin 1 and complement component 1q subcomponent binding protein as mitochondrial targets in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 74:1193–1203. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Duan Y, Yang Y, Zhu R and Xiao M: Endotoxin lipopolysaccharide challenge triggers gut microbiota dysbiosis and host immune remodeling in the tiger grouper Epinephelus fuscoguttatus. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 299(110364)2026.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Wang SQ, Jin MJ, Guo ZK, Shen DR, Jin LN, Cheng F, Zhao YR, Liu T, Li YC, Wang NY, et al: Trace element-dictated exosome modules and self-adaptive dual-network hydrogel orchestrate diabetic foot regeneration through complement-mitochondria-autophagy circuitry. Mil Med Res. 12(71)2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Zhai X, Liu K, Fang H, Zhang Q, Gao X, Liu F, Zhou S, Wang X, Niu Y, Hong Y, et al: Mitochondrial C1qbp promotes differentiation of effector CD8(+) T cells via metabolic-epigenetic reprogramming. Sci Adv. 7(eabk0490)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Feichtinger RG, Oláhová M, Kishita Y, Garone C, Kremer LS, Yagi M, Uchiumi T, Jourdain AA, Thompson K, D'Souza AR, et al: Biallelic C1QBP mutations cause severe Neonatal-, Childhood-, or later-onset cardiomyopathy associated with combined respiratory-chain deficiencies. Am J Hum Genet. 101:525–538. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Yenugonda V, Nomura N, Kouznetsova V, Tsigelny I, Fogal V, Nurmemmedov E, Kesari S and Babic I: A novel small molecule inhibitor of p32 mitochondrial protein overexpressed in glioma. J Transl Med. 15(210)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Reef S, Shifman O, Oren M and Kimchi A: The autophagic inducer smARF interacts with and is stabilized by the mitochondrial p32 protein. Oncogene. 26:6677–6683. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Bi Q, Nie J, Wu Q, Sun L, Zhu S, Bai J, Liu Y, Huang F and Chai K: Integrative pan-cancer genomic analysis highlights mitochondrial protein p32 as a potential therapeutic target in Myc-driven tumorigenesis. Med Oncol. 42(60)2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Wen X, Li W, Li S, Chen D, Zheng J, Wang X, Zhang C, Liu Y, Ning Y, Jia R, et al: Longitudinal single-cell RNA sequencing reveals a heterogeneous response of plasma cells to colonic inflammation. Int J Biol Macromol. 294(139307)2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Mizuguchi S, Gotoh K, Nakashima Y, Setoyama D, Takata Y, Ohga S and Kang D: Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species are essential for the development of psoriatic inflammation. Front Immunol. 12(714897)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Yao ZQ, Prayther D, Trabue C, Dong ZP and Moorman J: Differential regulation of SOCS-1 signalling in B and T lymphocytes by hepatitis C virus core protein. Immunology. 125:197–207. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Yao ZQ, Eisen-Vandervelde A, Waggoner SN, Cale EM and Hahn YS: Direct binding of hepatitis C virus core to gC1qR on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells leads to impaired activation of Lck and Akt. J Virol. 78:6409–6419. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Mumme H, Thomas BE, Bhasin SS, Krishnan U, Dwivedi B, Perumalla P, Sarkar D, Ulukaya GB, Sabnis HS, Park SI, et al: Single-cell analysis reveals altered tumor microenvironments of relapse- and remission-associated pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. Nat Commun. 14(6209)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Tian H, Wang G, Wang Q, Zhang B, Jiang G, Li H, Chai D, Fang L, Wang M and Zheng J: Complement C1q binding protein regulates T cells' mitochondrial fitness to affect their survival, proliferation, and anti-tumor immune function. Cancer Sci. 113:875–890. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Zhang C, Liu Y, Jiang J, Chen C, Duan Z, Su H, Wang S, Tian B, Shi Y, Xiang R and Luo Y: Targeting tumor cell-to-macrophage communication by blocking Vtn-C1qbp interaction inhibits tumor progression via enhancing macrophage phagocytosis. Theranostics. 14:2757–2776. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Wu X, Tang N, Zhao Q and Xiong J: Spatiotemporal evolutionary process of osteosarcoma immune microenvironment remodeling and C1QBP-driven drug resistance deciphered through single-cell multi-dimensional analysis. Bioeng Transl Med. 9(e10654)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Piltti KM, Lakatos A, Benavente-Perez F, Elrachid ZH, Nava AA, Addonizio NT, Nguyen V, Zahedi A, Song WA, Chen X, et al: C1q drives neural stem cell quiescence by regulating cell cycle and metabolism through BAI1. Nat Commun. 16(11386)2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Ghose S, Biswas S, Datta K and Tyagi RK: Dynamic Hyaluronan drives liver endothelial cells towards angiogenesis. BMC Cancer. 18(648)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Peerschke EI and Ghebrehiwet B: cC1qR/CR and gC1qR/p33: Observations in cancer. Mol Immunol. 61:100–109. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Dong X, Liu Z, Yu M, Yang X and Cai H: Identification of the whole genome of alternative splicing and RNA-binding proteins involved in nintedanib-induced apoptosis in gastric cancer cells. PeerJ. 12(e18697)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Rousso-Noori L, Mastandrea I, Talmor S, Waks T, Levin AG, Haugas M, Teesalu T, Alvarez-Vallina L, Eshhar Z and Friedmann-Morvinski D: P32-specific CAR T cells with dual antitumor and antiangiogenic therapeutic potential in gliomas. Nat Commun. 12(3615)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Lei Y, Li X, Qin D, Zhang Y and Wang Y: gC1qR: A new target for cancer immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 14(1095943)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Momenimovahed Z, Mazidimoradi A, Maroofi P, Allahqoli L, Salehiniya H and Alkatout I: Global, regional and national burden, incidence, and mortality of cervical cancer. Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 6(e1756)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Burd EM: Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Clin Microbiol Rev. 16:1–17. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Gao LJ, Gu PQ, Zhao W, Ding WY, Zhao XQ, Guo SY and Zhong TY: The role of globular heads of the C1q receptor in HPV 16 E2-induced human cervical squamous carcinoma cell apoptosis is associated with p38 MAPK/JNK activation. J Transl Med. 11(118)2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Chen ZL, Su YJ, Zhang HL, Gu PQ and Gao LJ: The role of the globular heads of the C1q receptor in HPV-16 E2-induced human cervical squamous carcinoma cell apoptosis via a mitochondria-dependent pathway. J Transl Med. 12(286)2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Gao LJ, Gu PQ, Fan WM, Liu Z, Qiu F, Peng YZ and Guo XR: The role of gC1qR in regulating survival of human papillomavirus 16 oncogene-transfected cervical cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 39:1265–1272. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Itahana K and Zhang Y: Mitochondrial p32 is a critical mediator of ARF-induced apoptosis. Cancer Cell. 13:542–553. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Liu Z, Su YJ, Gu PQ, Ji ZY, Wang XG and Gao LJ: The role of the globular heads of C1q receptor (gC1qR) gene in regulating apoptosis of human cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Cell Physiol Biochem. 30:1181–1190. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE and Jemel A: Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 71:7–33. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Yu G and Wang J: Significance of hyaluronan binding protein (HABP1/P32/gC1qR) expression in advanced serous ovarian cancer patients. Exp Mol Pathol. 94:210–215. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Duan C, Gao Y, Luan S, Guo S, Cao X, Xu P, Fu P and Zhao C: Noninvasive evaluation of HABP1 expression with 99mTc-labeled small-interference RNA in ovarian cancer. Int J Radiat Biol. 97:1569–1577. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Hunt H, Simón-Gracia L, Tobi A, Kotamraju VR, Sharma S, Nigul M, Sugahara KN, Ruoslahti E and Teesalu T: Targeting of p32 in peritoneal carcinomatosis with intraperitoneal linTT1 peptide-guided pro-apoptotic nanoparticles. J Control Release. 260:142–153. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Bryce C, Gazda R and Fuerst H: Endometrial cancer: Rapid evidence review. Am Fam Physician. 111:526–531. 2025.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Galani A, Stavros S, Moustakli E, Potiris A, Zikopoulos A, Anagnostaki I, Zacharis K, Paraskevaidi M, Lyons D, Maneta-Stavrakaki S, et al: Endometrial hyperplasia: Current insights into epidemiology, risk factors, and clinical management. Cancers (Basel), 2025, 18(1). | |
|
Zheng Y, Hu R, Yang F, Liu G, Peng T, Xie L, Wu J, Hou L and Yuan R: Comparing survival outcomes between surgical and non-surgical treatments in patients with early-onset endometrial cancer and developing a nomogram to predict survival: A study based on Eastern and Western data sets. World J Surg Oncol. 23(184)2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Rubinstein DB, Stortchevoi A, Boosalis M, Ashfaq R, Ghebrehiwet B, Peerschke EI, Calvo F and Guillaume T: Receptor for the globular heads of C1q (gC1q-R, p33, hyaluronan-binding protein) is preferentially expressed by adenocarcinoma cells. Int J Cancer. 110:741–750. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Yang M, Hu Y, Guo W, Yang F, Qi X and Zheng Y: Causal relationship between components of metabolic syndrome and endometrial carcinoma. Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 55:1557–1566. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar : (In Chinese). | |
|
Pérez-Martín AR, Castro-Eguiluz D, Cetina-Pérez L, Velasco-Torres Y, Bahena-González A, Montes-Servín E, González-Ibarra E, Espinosa-Romero R and Gallardo-Rincón D: Impact of metabolic syndrome on the risk of endometrial cancer and the role of lifestyle in prevention. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 22:499–510. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
de Boer SM, Powell ME, Mileshkin L, Katsaros D, Bessette P, Haie-Meder C, Ottevanger PB, Ledermann JA, Khaw P, D'Amico R, et al: Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): patterns of recurrence and post-hoc survival analysis of a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 20:1273–1285. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Ryu KJ, Kim MS, Lee JY, Nam S, Jeong HG, Kim T and Park H: Risk of endometrial polyps, hyperplasia, carcinoma, and uterine cancer after tamoxifen treatment in premenopausal women with breast cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 5(e2243951)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Katagiri R, Iwasaki M, Abe SK, Islam MR, Rahman MS, Saito E, Merritt MA, Choi JY, Shin A, Sawada N, et al: Reproductive factors and endometrial cancer risk among women. JAMA Netw Open. 6(e2332296)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Liang J and Shang Y: Estrogen and cancer. Annu Rev Physiol. 75:225–240. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Hu Z, Tang M, Huang Y, Cai B, Sun X, Chen G, Huang A, Li X, Shah AR, Jiang L, et al: SIRT7 facilitates endometrial cancer progression by regulating PTEN stability in an estrogen-dependent manner. Nat Commun. 16(2989)2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Thakur SC, Kumar V, Ghosh I, Bharadwaj A and Datta K: Appearance of hyaluronan binding protein 1 proprotein in pachytene spermatocytes and round spermatids correlates with spermatogenesis. J Androl. 27:604–610. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Xiao S, Xu C and Jarvis JN: C1q-bearing immune complexes induce IL-8 secretion in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) through protein tyrosine kinase- and mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent mechanisms: evidence that the 126 kD phagocytic C1q receptor mediates immune complex activation of HUVEC. Clin Exp Immunol. 125:360–367. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Dong M, Seemann F, Humble JL, Liang Y, Peterson DR, Ye R, Ren H, Kim HS, Lee JS, Au DWT and Lam YW: Modification of the plasma complement protein profile by exogenous estrogens is indicative of a compromised immune competence in marine medaka (Oryzias melastigma). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 70:260–269. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Wu Y, Li X, Hou Y, Lv M and Zhao S: Targeting the KRAS-p38-ATF4 axis enhances the therapeutic sensitivity of the peptide PDBAG1 in ovarian cancer via stress response modulation. Eur J Pharmacol. 1006(178128)2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Liu Y, Leslie PL, Jin A, Itahana K, Graves LM and Zhang Y: p32 heterozygosity protects against age- and diet-induced obesity by increasing energy expenditure. Sci Rep. 7(5754)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Liu Y, Leslie PL, Jin A, Itahana K, Graves LM and Zhang Y: p32 regulates ER stress and lipid homeostasis by down-regulating GCS1 expression. FASEB J. 32:3892–3902. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
van den Heerik A, Horeweg N, de Boer SM, Bosse T and Creutzberg CL: Adjuvant therapy for endometrial cancer in the era of molecular classification: Radiotherapy, chemoradiation and novel targets for therapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 31:594–604. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Wang J, Shi Y, Wang Y, Shen Y, Liu H, Sun S, Wang Y, Zhou X, Zhou Y, Zeng X, et al: PA28γ promotes the malignant progression of tumor by elevating mitochondrial function via C1QBP. Elife. 13(RP101244)2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Yagi M, Uchiumi T, Takazaki S, Okuno B, Nomura M, Yoshida S, Kanki T and Kang D: p32/gC1qR is indispensable for fetal development and mitochondrial translation: Importance of its RNA-binding ability. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:9717–9737. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Wang Z, Chen J, Wu X, Ma D, Zhang X, Li R, Han C, Liu H, Yin X, Du Q, et al: PCV2 targets cGAS to inhibit type I interferon induction to promote other DNA virus infection. PLoS Pathog. 17(e1009940)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Song N, Zhao L, Zhu M and Zhao J: Recent progress in LyP-1-based strategies for targeted imaging and therapy. Drug Deliv. 26:363–375. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Jenkins MR and Drummond KJ: CAR T-cell therapy for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 390:1329–1332. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Bagley SJ, Logun M, Fraietta JA, Wang X, Desai AS, Bagley LJ, Nabavizadeh A, Jarocha D, Martins R, Maloney E, et al: Intrathecal bivalent CAR T cells targeting EGFR and IL13Rα2 in recurrent glioblastoma: Phase 1 trial interim results. Nat Med. 30:1320–1329. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Choe JH, Watchmaker PB, Simic MS, Gilbert RD, Li AW, Krasnow NA, Downey KM, Yu W, Carrera DA, Celli A, et al: SynNotch-CAR T cells overcome challenges of specificity, heterogeneity, and persistence in treating glioblastoma. Sci Transl Med. 13(eabe7378)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Cai G, Huang F, Gao Y, Li X, Chi J, Xie J, Zhou L, Feng Y, Huang H, Deng T, et al: Artificial intelligence-based models enabling accurate diagnosis of ovarian cancer using laboratory tests in China: A multicentre, retrospective cohort study. Lancet Digit Health. 6:e176–e186. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Njoku K, Barr CE, Sutton CJJ and Crosbie EJ: Urine CA125 and HE4 for the triage of symptomatic women with suspected endometrial cancer. Cancers (Basel). 14(3306)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Scully OJ, Shyamasundar S, Matsumoto K, Dheen ST, Yip GW and Bay BH: C1QBP Mediates breast cancer cell proliferation and growth via multiple potential signalling pathways. Int J Mol Sci. 24(1343)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Sonveaux P, Végran F, Schroeder T, Wergin MC, Verrax J, Rabbani ZN, De Saedeleer CJ, Kennedy KM, Diepart C, Jordan B, et al: Targeting lactate-fueled respiration selectively kills hypoxic tumor cells in mice. J Clin Invest. 118:3930–3942. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |