|
1
|
De Braekeleer E, Douet-Guilbert N, Basinko
A, et al: Using bacterial artificial chromosomes in leukemia
research: the experience at the university cytogenetics laboratory
in Brest, France. J Biomed Biotechnol. 3294712011.
|
|
2
|
Van den Veyver IB, Patel A, Shaw CA, et
al: Clinical use of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH)
for prenatal diagnosis in 300 cases. Prenat Diagn. 29:29–39.
2009.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3
|
Lee CN, Lin SY, Lin CH, Shih JC, Lin TH
and Su YN: Clinical utility of array comparative genomic
hybridisation for prenatal diagnosis: a cohort study of 3171
pregnancies. BJOG. Feb 07–2012.(E-pub ahead of print).
|
|
4
|
Shen Y, Dies KA, Holm IA, et al: Clinical
genetic testing for patients with autism spectrum disorders.
Pediatrics. 125:727–735. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
Miller DT, Adam MP, Aradhya S, et al:
Consensus statement: Chromosomal microarray is a first-tier
clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental
disabilities or congenital anomalies. Am J Hum Genet. 86:749–764.
2010. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
6
|
Kang JU, Koo SH, Kwon KC, Park JW, Shin
SY, Kim JM and Jung SS: High frequency of genetic alterations in
non-small cell lung cancer detected by multi-target fluorescence in
situ hybridization. J Korean Med Sci. 22:S47–S51. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
7
|
Kang JU, Koo SH, Jeong TE, Kwon KC, Park
JW and Jeon CH: Multitarget fluorescence in situ hybridization and
melanoma antigen genes analysis in primary bladder carcinoma.
Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 164:32–38. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
8
|
Kang JU, Koo SH, Kwon KC and Park JW:
Frequent silence of chromosome 9p, homozygous DOCK8,
DMRT1 and DMRT3 deletion at 9p24.3 in squamous cell
carcinoma of the lung. Int J Oncol. 37:327–335. 2010.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
9
|
Kang JU, Koo SH, Kwon KC, Park JW and Kim
JM: Identification of novel candidate target genes, including
EPHB3, MASP1 and SST at 3q26.2-q29 in squamous cell carcinoma of
the lung. BMC Cancer. 9:2372009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
10
|
Shaffer LG and Bejjani BA: Medical
applications of array CGH and the transformation of clinical
cytogenetics. Cytogenet Genome Res. 115:303–309. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
11
|
Maciejewski JP and Mufti GJ: Whole genome
scanning as a cytogenetic tool in hematologic malignancies. Blood.
15:965–974. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
12
|
Duncan A and Langlois S: SOGC Genetics
Committee: CCMG Prenatal Diagnosis Committee. Use of array genomic
hybridization technology in prenatal diagnosis in Canada. J Obstet
Gynaecol Can. 33:1256–1259. 2011.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
13
|
de Ravel TJ, Devriendt K, Fryns JP and
Vermeesch JR: What’s new in karyotyping? The move towards array
comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH). Eur J Pediatr.
166:637–643. 2007.
|
|
14
|
Vialard F, Molina Gomes D, Leroy B, et al:
Array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis:
another experience. Fetal Diagn Ther. 25:277–284. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
15
|
Hillman SC, Pretlove S, Coomarasamy A, et
al: Additional information from array comparative genomic
hybridization technology over conventional karyotyping in prenatal
diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet
Gynecol. 37:6–14. 2011. View
Article : Google Scholar
|
|
16
|
Le Caignec C, Boceno M, Saugier-Veber P,
Jacquemont S, Joubert M, David A, Frebourg T and Rival JM:
Detection of genomic imbalances by array based comparative genomic
hybridisation in fetuses with multiple malformations. J Med Genet.
42:121–128. 2005.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
17
|
D’Amours G, Kibar Z, Mathonnet G, Fetni R,
Tihy F, Désilets V, Nizard S, Michaud JL and Lemyre E: Whole-genome
array CGH identifies pathogenic copy number variations in fetuses
with major malformations and a normal karyotype. Clin Genet.
81:128–141. 2012.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18
|
Maitz S, Gentilin B, Colli AM, et al:
Expanding the phenotype of 22q13.3 deletion: report of a case
detected prenatally. Prenat Diagn. 28:978–980. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
19
|
Zuffardi O, Vetro A, Brady P and Vermeesch
J: Array technology in prenatal diagnosis. Semin Fetal Neonatal
Med. 16:94–98. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
20
|
Wat MJ, Shchelochkov OA, Holder AM, et al:
Chromosome 8p23.1 deletions as a cause of complex congenital heart
defects and diaphragmatic hernia. Am J Med Genet A. 149A:1661–1677.
2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
21
|
Lichtenbelt KD, Knoers NV and
Schuring-Blom GH: From karyotyping to array-CGH in prenatal
diagnosis. Cytogenet Genome Res. 135:241–250. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
22
|
Breman AM, Bi WM and Cheung SW: Prenatal
diagnosis by array-based comparative genomic hybridization in the
clinical laboratory setting. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao. 18:500–504.
2009.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
23
|
De Gregori M, Ciccone R, Magini P, et al:
Cryptic deletions are a common finding in ‘balanced’ reciprocal and
complex chromosome rearrangements: a study of 59 patients. J Med
Genet. 44:750–762. 2007.
|
|
24
|
Baptista J, Mercer C, Prigmore E, et al:
Breakpoint mapping and array CGH in translocations: comparison of a
phenotypically normal and an abnormal cohort. Am J Hum Genet.
82:927–936. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
25
|
Schluth-Bolard C, Delobel B, Sanlaville D,
et al: Cryptic genomic imbalances in de novo and inherited
apparently balanced chromosomal rearrangements: array CGH study of
47 unrelated cases. Eur J Med Genet. 52:291–296. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
26
|
Cain CC, Saul DO, Oehler E, Blakemore K
and Stetten G: Prenatal detection of a subtle unbalanced chromosome
rearrangement by karyotyping, FISH and array comparative genomic
hybridization. Fetal Diagn Ther. 24:286–290. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
27
|
Warburton D: De novo balanced chromosome
rearrangements and extra marker chromosomes identified at prenatal
diagnosis: clinical significance and distribution of breakpoints.
Am J Hum Genet. 49:995–1013. 1991.
|
|
28
|
ACOG Committee No. 446. Array comparative
genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol.
114:1161–1163. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
29
|
Evangelidou P, Sismani C, Ioannides M,
Christodoulou C, Koumbaris G, Kallikas I, Georgiou I, Velissariou V
and Patsalis PC: Clinical application of whole-genome array CGH
during prenatal diagnosis: Study of 25 selected pregnancies with
abnormal ultrasound findings or apparently balanced structural
aberrations. Mol Cytogenet. 3:242010. View Article : Google Scholar
|
