|
1
|
Hua ZZ, Xu HY, Zhou GY, Liu JF, Huang HM
and Ding WX: Analyses of thermal stress and fracture during
cryopreservation of blood vessel. Sci China Ser E-Tech Sci.
31:123–127. 2001.
|
|
2
|
Dahl SL, Koh J, Prabhakar V and Niklason
LE: Decellularized native and engineered arterial scaffolds for
transplantation. Cell Transplant. 12:659–666. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3
|
Gui L, Muto A, Chan SA, Breuer CK and
Niklason LE: Development of decellularized human umbilical arteries
as small-diameter vascular grafts. Tissue Eng Part A. 15:2665–2676.
2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4
|
Frota AC, Lima Filho AA, Dias AB, Lourenço
AC, Antecka E and Burnier MN Jr: Freeze-drying as an alternative
method of human sclera preservation. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 71:137–141.
2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
Gherardini G, Haegerstrand A, Matarasso A,
Gurlek A, Evans GR and Lundeberg T: Cell adhesion and short-term
patency in human endothelium preseeded 1.5-mm
polytetrafluoroethylene vascular grafts: an experimental study.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 99:472–478. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
6
|
Weinberg CB and Bell E: A blood vessel
model constructed from collagen and cultured vascular cells.
Science. 231:397–400. 1986. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
7
|
Matsuda T, Kitamura T, Iwata H, Takano H
and Akutsu T: A hybrid artificial vascular graft based upon an
organ reconstruction model. Significance and design criteria of an
artificial basement membrane. ASAIO Trans. 34:640–643. 1988.
|
|
8
|
Ratcliffe A: Tissue engineering of
vascular grafts. Matrix Biol. 19:353–357. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
9
|
Guymer RH and Mandel TE: A comparison of
corneal, pancreas, and skin grafts in mice. A study of the
determinants of tissue immunogenicity. Transplantation.
57:1251–1262. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
10
|
Umscheid T and Stelter WJ: Time-related
alterations in shape, position, and structure of self-expanding,
modular aortic stent-grafts: a 4-year single-center follow-up. J
Endovasc Surg. 6:17–32. 1999.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
11
|
Hiles MC, Badylak SF, Lantz GC, Kokini K,
Geddes LA and Morff RJ: Mechanical properties of xenogeneic
small-intestinal submucosa when used as an aortic graft in the dog.
J Biomed Mater Res. 29:883–891. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
12
|
Bacon LD and Motta J: Skin-graft
histocompatibility within Regional Poultry Research Laboratory
inbred chicken lines. Poult Sci. 61:218–220. 1982. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
13
|
Chang C and Zhang J: The analysis of
relationship between fetal stress and blood dynamics in fetal
vessels and placental bed vessels. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi.
31:15–17. 1996.(In Chinese).
|
|
14
|
Rose AG, Forman R and Bowen RM:
Calcification of glutaraldehyde-fixed porcine xenograft. Thorax.
33:111–114. 1978. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
15
|
Yin M, Liu MF, Cao Q, Wu JQ and Tao LR:
Mechanical properties of porcine aorta after vacuum freeze-drying
processes. J Clin Rehab Tissue Eng Res. 14:9539–9544. 2010.
|
|
16
|
Timaran CH, Stevens SL, Freeman MB and
Goldman MH: Infrainguinal bypass grafting using lyophilized
saphenous vein allografts for limb salvage. Cardiovasc Surg.
10:315–319. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
17
|
Cooper DK: Clinical survey of heart
transplantation between ABO blood group-incompatible recipients and
donors. J Heart Transplant. 9:376–381. 1990.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18
|
Vesely I, Gonzalez-Lavin L, Graf D and
Boughner D: Mechanical testing of cryopreserved aortic allografts.
Comparison with xenografts and fresh tissue. J Thorac Cardiovasc
Surg. 99:119–123. 1990.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
19
|
Cattral MS, Warnock GL, Kneteman NM,
Halloran PF and Rajotte RV: The effect of cryopreservation on the
survival and MHC antigen expression of murine islet allografts.
Transplantation. 55:159–163. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
20
|
Gavin JB, Herdson PB, Monro JL and
Barratt-Boyes BG: Pathology of antibiotic-treated human heart valve
allografts. Thorax. 28:473–481. 1973. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
21
|
Zhao G, Liu ZF, Zhang AL, Zhang HF and
Cheng SX: Theoretical analyses of thermal stress of blood vessel
during cryopreservation. Cryo Letters. 26:239–250. 2005.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
22
|
Pegg DE, Wusteman MC and Boylan S:
Fractures in cryopreserved elastic arteries. Cryobiology.
34:183–192. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
23
|
Bujan J, Pascual G, Lopez R, et al:
Gradual thawing improves the preservation of cryopreserved
arteries. Cryobiology. 42:256–265. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
24
|
Zuhdi N, Hawley W, Voehl V, Hancock W,
Carey J and Greer A: Porcine aortic valves as replacements for
human heart valves. Ann Thorac Surg. 17:479–491. 1974. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
25
|
Sawyer PN: Experimental observations on
antithrombotic biophysical phenomena in normal and atherosclerotic
human aorta and porcine aortic grafts. Ann NY Acad Sci.
149:628–642. 1968. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
26
|
Leyh RG, Wilhelmi M, Walles T, et al:
Acellularized porcine heart valve scaffolds for heart valve tissue
engineering and the risk of cross-species transmission of porcine
endogenous retrovirus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 126:1000–1004.
2003. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
27
|
Rieder E, Kasimir MT, Silberhumer G, et
al: Decellularization protocols of porcine heart valves differ
importantly in efficiency of cell removal and susceptibility of the
matrix to recellularization with human vascular cells. J Thorac
Cardiovasc Surg. 127:399–405. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar
|
