Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Oncology Letters
      • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • Information for Authors
    • Information for Reviewers
    • Information for Librarians
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Reviewers
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Login Register Submit
  • This site uses cookies
  • You can change your cookie settings at any time by following the instructions in our Cookie Policy. To find out more, you may read our Privacy Policy.

    I agree
Search articles by DOI, keyword, author or affiliation
Search
Advanced Search
presentation
Molecular Medicine Reports
Join Editorial Board Propose a Special Issue
Print ISSN: 1791-2997 Online ISSN: 1791-3004
Journal Cover
March 2013 Volume 7 Issue 3

Full Size Image

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

Journals

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.

Molecular Medicine Reports

Molecular Medicine Reports

Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.

Biomedical Reports

Biomedical Reports

Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.

World Academy of Sciences Journal

World Academy of Sciences Journal

Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.

International Journal of Epigenetics

International Journal of Epigenetics

Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.

Medicine International

Medicine International

An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.

Journal Cover
March 2013 Volume 7 Issue 3

Full Size Image

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

  • Article
  • Citations
    • Cite This Article
    • Download Citation
    • Create Citation Alert
    • Remove Citation Alert
    • Cited By
  • Similar Articles
    • Related Articles (in Spandidos Publications)
    • Similar Articles (Google Scholar)
    • Similar Articles (PubMed)
  • Download PDF
  • Download XML
  • View XML
Article

Chondrogenesis of myoblasts in biodegradable poly-lactide-co-glycolide scaffolds

  • Authors:
    • Yanglin Gu
    • Peng Chen
    • Yusheng Yang
    • Keqin Shi
    • Yubin Wang
    • Wenhui Zhu
    • Guoxing Zhu
  • View Affiliations / Copyright

    Affiliations: Department of Orthopedics, Wuxi No. 2 People's Hospital, Jiangsu 214002, P.R. China, Department of Sports Medicine, Dongfang Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai 200120, P.R. China
  • Pages: 1003-1009
    |
    Published online on: December 18, 2012
       https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2012.1240
  • Expand metrics +
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

This article is mentioned in:



Abstract

Myoblasts are considered to be an alternative cell source for cell-based meniscal repair due to their multiple differentiation potentials. This study addresses the chondrogenic differentiation of myoblasts seeded into poly-lactide-co-glycolide (PLGA) scaffolds following implantation in a subcutaneous pocket of nude mice. Canine myoblasts isolated from a Beagle were expanded and seeded into PLGA scaffolds and cultured in cartilage-derived morphogenetic protein-2 (CDMP-2) and transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1)-containing medium for 2 weeks in vitro. The constructs were implanted into a subcutaneous pocket of 24 combined immunodeficiency mice and harvested after 8 and 12 weeks, respectively. Hematoxylin and eosin staining of the sections of the engineered cartilage at 8 and 12 weeks revealed the regeneration of fibrocartilage. Immunohistochemical staining confirmed a similar distribution of collagen type Ⅱ in the engineered cartilage as the normal meniscus. At 12 weeks, expression of mRNAs for type Ⅰ collagen, type Ⅱ collagen and aggrecan was detected by RT-PCR. The compressive moduli of engineered cartilage reached 85.72% of the normal meniscus at 12 weeks, with a high level of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content (no statistical difference from normal). Myoblast-seeded PLGA scaffolds express a stable chondrogenic phenotype in a heterotopic model of cartilage transplantation and represent a suitable tool for tissue engineering of cartilage.

Introduction

Meniscus has limited potential of self-repair, and menisci injury may lead to long-term degenerative joint changes (1,2). In addition to other therapies, meniscal regeneration using tissue engineering techniques has been attempted, based on the loading and culture of suitable cells into appropriate scaffolds (3,4). With regards to the cell source, meniscal chondrocytes, mesenchymal cells and pluripotential fibroblasts have all been identified as possible sources for the repair of meniscal tissue (5–7). Compared with the cell sources mentioned above, myoblasts are a promising source for meniscal engineering, as they are relatively abundant and easily accessible with minimal donor site morbidity. Myoblasts may also be good candidates for tissue engineering as they have a higher cell yield and proliferate rapidly during in vitro expansion (8).

With regards to the scaffold, a variety of natural or artificial biomaterials have been investigated for use in tissue-engineered meniscus. Due to the poor biomechanical properties and the rapid degradation of fibrin and alginate, polymer scaffolds with a stable, biodegradable and permeable pore network were used to support cell attachment, proliferation and nutrient exchange and to provide stability (5,9).

In this study, non-woven PLGA scaffolds were seeded with myoblasts and transplanted into subcutaneous pockets of 24 combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice. It was hypothesized that such cell-seeded constructs would demonstrate a cartilage-like morphology with expression of chondrocyte-specific molecules, while also conserving sufficient biomechanical characteristics, after 12 weeks in vivo.

Materials and methods

Isolation, culture and induction of myoblasts

Canine myoblasts were isolated and cultured as previously described (10). Primary cells were seeded on a culture dish at a density of 5×105 cells/cm2 in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Gibco-BRL, Grand Island, NY, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco-BRL), 300 μg/ml of L-glutamine, 50 μg/ml vitamin C, 100 U/ml penicillin G, 100 μg/ml streptomycin and amphotericin B 0.25 μg/ml (all from Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). After medium change, cultured myoblasts were subjected to chondrogenic induction with culture medium containing 50 ng/ml CDMP-2 and 20 ng/ml TGF-β1 (Sigma). The myoblasts were cultured at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2. The medium was changed every third day, and this washed out all non-adherent cells. Cells were subcultured at a density of 1.0×104 cells/cm2 and treated with 0.25% trypsin plus 0.02% EDTA (Gibco-BRL) when they reached 80% confluence. The study was approved by the ethics committee of Tongji University, Shanghai, China.

Immunocytochemistry assay of collagen II

To determine the in vitro chondrogenic induction effect, induced myoblasts were examined for type II collagen expression using immunocytochemical staining. Briefly, cells were incubated at 37°C for 1 h with mouse anti-collagen-II monoclonal antibody (IgG1; BD Biosciences Clontech, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, 1:200), followed by incubation with 1:100 diluted horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-mouse antibody (Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA) for 30 min and color development with diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB). Normal menisci served as positive controls.

Preparation of PLGA scaffold and cell seeding

A non-woven copolymer scaffold of L-lactide and glycolide (90/10, PLGA) in the form of fibers was generously provided by Shanghai Ju Rui Biomaterials Co., Inc., (China). The scaffolds were cylindrical, with a diameter of 10 mm and a thickness of 2 mm. The pore sizes of the non-woven fibers were on average 75 μm, the pore volume accounted for 97% of the total volume, and the filament diameter was 13 μm. The PLGA constructs were treated using the low-pressure plasma technique at the end of the production process. A partially ionized gas reacted with the surface of the scaffolds and formed reactive particles. Prior to cell seeding, the scaffolds were immersed in DMEM/F12 medium containing 10% (v/v) FBS for 12 h to enhance cell adhesion onto the scaffold.

Chondrogenically induced myoblasts at passage 3 (1.5×107 in 0.3 ml) were harvested and placed onto PLGA scaffolds, respectively, to form cell-scaffold constructs and the constructs were cultured at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 for 5 h, which allowed the complete adhesion of myoblasts to the scaffold. The cell-PLGA constructs in inductive media were subsequently cultured in vitro for 14 days. Medium was changed three times a week. As an experimental control, scaffolds with non-induced myoblasts were cultured for the same lengths of time.

Surgical procedure

Six-week-old athymic nude mice were used in this study, and were obtained from the Agricultural Institute of Shanghai Jiaotong University, China. Animal care and experimental procedures were in accordance with the guidelines of the Administrative Panel on Laboratory Animal Care of China. Under general intraperitoneal anesthesia and after disinfection of the back of each of the 24 mice, two subcutaneous pockets were bluntly created through a 1.5-cm incision in the back. A construct (induced cell-PLGA construct or non-induced cell-PLGA construct control) was inserted in each subcutaneous pocket. The wound was closed using a single interrupted suture. No animal died during the experimental period. The animals were sacrificed and the implants were harvested at 8 and 12 weeks, respectively.

Histological and immunohistochemical analyses

Eight and 12 weeks after implantation, the implants were retrieved and analyzed histologically and immunohistochemically, respectively. For histological analyses, specimens were fixed in 10% (v/v) buffered formalin, dehydrated with a series of graded alcohol and embedded in paraffin. Tissue sections (4-μm thick) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for morphological analysis.

Expression of collagen type II was detected using monoclonal antibodies (Dako). Briefly, after deparaffinization, sections were predigested with trypsin at 37°C for 30 min to facilitate antibody access, endogenous peroxidase was removed by the treatment of 0.3% H2O2 in methanol at room temperature for 30 min, and non-specific antibody binding was blocked by incubation of sections in 10% normal goat serum at 37°C for 30 min. Mouse anti-canine collagen type II diluted 1:100 in 0.01 M PBS (pH 7.4) was applied as a primary antibody at 4°C overnight. Sections were then incubated with the secondary antibody, rabbit anti-mouse immunoglobulin (Dako) for 60 min, followed by application of mouse PAP kit (Dako). Collagen type II was visualized by the reactions with 0.05% diaminobenzidine containing 0.01% H2O2.

Analysis of mRNA for extracellular matrices and collagen with reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction

RNA samples were obtained after 12 weeks and transcribed into cDNA by real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for gene expression of type I collagen, type II collagen and aggrecan. After explantation, the constructs were digested with Ultraturax™ and total mRNA was prepared using TRIzol reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Gibco-BRL). Total RNA (1 μg) was treated with 1 unit of deoxyribonuclease I (DNase I; Gibco-BRL) in order to digest genomic DNA contamination. Random-primed cDNA synthesis was performed using 1 μg of DNase I-treated total RNA and 50 units of StrataScript reverse transcriptase according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA). TaqMan™ PCR assays were performed in 96-well optical plates on an ABI Prism 7700 Sequence Detection system (Applied Biosystems, Forster City, CA, USA) using ABsolute QPCR ROX Mix (Abgene, Hamburg, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The thermal cycling conditions were 95°C for 15 min followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 1 min. The PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis in 2% agarose gels and stained with ethidium bromide. The mRNAs analyzed were collagen I (681 bp), collagen II (447 bp), aggrecan (321 bp) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (211 bp). Primer sequences for GAPDH, aggrecan, collagen I and collagen II were as follows: GAPDH, sense 5′-CCTCTATGCCAACACAGTGC-3′ and antisense 5′-GTACTCCTGCTTGCTGATCC-3′; aggrecan, sense 5′-TAG AGAAGAAGAGGGGTTAGG-3′ and antisense 5′-AGCACT AGGAGCCAGGGTTAT-3′; collagen I, sense 5′-ATGCCC AAGACTACCAGTGG-3′ and antisense 5′-TCCTGG AAGCTCTTCTCAGT-3′; collagen II, sense 5′-TTTCCC AGGTCAAGATGGTC-3′ and antisense 5′-CTTCAGCAC CTGTCTCACCA-3′.

Biomechanical analysis of engineered cartilage

Eight and 12 weeks after implantation, the biomechanical properties of the engineered cartilage were tested by measuring the compressive modulus. Briefly, the specimens were harvested and trimmed to fit in a test chamber (5 mm diameter) of a biomechanical analyzer (Instron, Canton, MA, USA). A constant compressive strain rate of 1 mm/min was used until the maximal force of 450 N was reached, and thus a force-displacement curve was obtained. The compressive moduli of tested tissues were automatically calculated by the machine and further verified by manual calculation with the formula: ΔP/A × L/ΔL (ΔP, the compressive force margin of the 2 points on the linear segment of the load-displacement curve before the first break point; ΔL, the displacement margin of the corresponding two abovementioned points; A, the area of tested tissue; L, the thickness of tested tissue). In addition, the normal canine menisci were tested as a control. ANOVA analysis was applied and P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant result.

Glycosaminoglycan (GAG) quantification of engineered cartilage

GAG quantitative analysis of 8- and 12-week specimens was performed. Briefly, the specimens were minced and triturated to prepare the protein solution. A series of reagents was added step by step to ensure the specific binding of Alcian blue and polysulfated molecules of GAGs in engineered cartilage. All GAGs were precipitated specifically in guanidine-HCl by using a low pH in combination with detergent and a high salt concentration. The precipitate was dissolved in a mixture of guanidine-HCl and propanol. For quantification, the absorbance was recorded in a microplate reader with a 600-nm filter, and a linear standard curve between 0.5 and 20 μg was generated by adding known amounts of proteoglycans. The results were analyzed using the ANOVA test. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Since no neocartilage was generated we did not analyse the quantitive GAG in the control group. The positive control was also tested as a normal meniscus.

Statistical analysis

The presence of type II collagen in the repaired meniscus tissue from the different groups was noted and statistically compared using the Fisher’s exact test. Compressive modulus and GAG content in the different groups were analyzed with ANOVA. For all evaluations, the level of statistical significance was set at a probability value of <0.05.

Results

Morphological and immunohistochemical analysis

As shown in Fig. 1, myoblasts induced with CDMP-2 and TGF-β1 underwent a morphological change after chondrogenic induction, approaching the shape of native chondrocytes. In addition, the induced cells showed significantly enhanced collagen II expression compared to control cells (Fig. 2).

Figure 1

Morphological change between primary myoblasts and chondrogenically induced myoblasts. (A) Morphology of canine myoblasts cultured in a monolayer manner on day 3 in primary culture. (B) Myoblasts undergo chondrogenic differentiation after 14 days. Magnification, 100 μm.

Figure 2

Immunocytochemical staining demonstrates a stronger expression of collagen II in (A) induced cells than in (B) non-induced cells. Magnification, 200 μm.

Gross morphology of engineered cartilage

Specimens harvested after 8 weeks of in vivo culture showed that all induced cell-PLGA constructs maintained the approximate original scaffold shape and size, and had a compact consistency (Fig. 3). The non-induced cell-PLGA constructs showed a failure to maintain the shape and size of the original scaffold. Twelve-week specimens showed a more cartilaginous appearance. However, no construct was identified in the control group, indicating that the scaffold was degraded completely at 12 weeks.

Figure 3

Gross morphology of engineered cartilage. (A) A PLGA scaffold, (B) an induced cell-PLGA construct at 8 weeks post-implantation, (C) a non-induced cell-PLGA construct at 8 weeks post-implantation and (D) an induced cell-PLGA construct at 12 weeks post-implantation. PLGA, poly-lactide-co-glycolide.

Histological and immunohistochemical assessment of engineered cartilage

A histological section of engineered cartilage at 8 weeks had the appearance of fibrocartilage with fibrochondrocytic-like cells (Fig. 4A). In the control group, only a band of fibrous tissue was observed (Fig. 4B). The engineered cartilage at 12 weeks had histological structures more similar to those of normal cartilage than those at 8 weeks (Fig. 4C).

Figure 4

Hematoxylin and eosin histology of engineered cartilage. (A) An induced cell-PLGA construct at 8 weeks post-implantation, (B) a non-induced cell-PLGA construct at 8 weeks post-implantation and (C) an induced cell-PLGA construct at 12 weeks post-implantation. PLGA, poly-lactide-co-glycolide.

Immunohistological staining indicated that engineered cartilage was positively stained for type II collagen at 8 weeks post-implantation (Fig. 5A). With the maturation of engineered cartilage, the expression and distribution of collagen II was found to be similar to that of the neighboring native meniscus at 12 weeks post-implantation (Fig. 5C). However, no expression of collagen II was observed in all specimens of the control group at 8 weeks (Fig. 5B).

Figure 5

Type II collagen immunohistochemistry of engineered cartilage. (A) An induced cell-PLGA construct at 8 weeks post-implantation, (B) a non-induced cell-PLGA construct at 8 weeks post-implantation and (C) an induced cell-PLGA construct at 12 weeks post-implantation. PLGA, poly-lactide-co-glycolide.

Expression of cartilage-specific genes by RT-PCR

To investigate the chondrogenic differentiation of the engineered cartilage, mRNA expression of type I collagen, type II collagen and aggrecan was assessed using RT-PCR. At 12 weeks, expression of mRNAs for type I collagen, type II collagen and aggrecan was detected. By contrast, none of the assessed genes were expressed in the control tissue (Fig. 6). Gene expression of the normal meniscus was assessed as a positive control.

Figure 6

Analysis of expression of mRNA for aggrecan, collagen I, II and GAPDH with RT-PCR. (A) Positive control using a normal meniscus. (B) An induced cell-PLGA construct 12 weeks post-implantation and (C) a non-induced cell-PLGA construct 12 weeks post-implantation. PLGA, poly-lactide-co-glycolide.

Biomechanical properties of engineered cartilage

As summarized in Table I, the compressive moduli increased with length of transplantation time. At 8 weeks, the moduli reached 50.41 and 23.16% of the normal meniscus level, respectively, in the experimental and control groups, and the experimental group increased further to 85.72% at 12 weeks. Statistical analysis demonstrated that the compressive modulus was higher in the induced group (Exp) than in the non-induced group (Ctrl) (P<0.05), indicating that in vitro chondrogenic induction is helpful for improving biomechanical properties of myoblast-engineered cartilage.

Table I

The compressive moduli of repaired cartilage.

Table I

The compressive moduli of repaired cartilage.

8 weeks (n=12)12 weeks (n=12)


GroupsModuli (MPa)Percentage of normal (%)Moduli (MPa)Percentage of normal (%)
Normal27.12±0.6928.92±1.35
Exp13.67±1.83050.41±2.9324.79±2.7885.72±4.23
Ctrl6.28±1.5223.16±2.49

[i] The compressive moduli increased with the transplanted time and the value is always higher in induced cell-PLGA constructs group (Exp) than in non-induced cell-PLGA constructs group (Ctrl) with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05).

GAG content quantification

The GAG deposition of the engineered cartilage was further quantified by biochemical analysis and also compared with that of the normal meniscus. As shown in Table II, it was found that the amount of GAG in the experimental group at 8 weeks reached 47.39% of that in the normal meniscus, as compared with 23.26% for the control group (P<0.05). However, with the maturation of the engineered cartilage to 12 weeks, GAG content was increased, reaching 91.35% of that in the normal meniscus (P<0.05). A significant difference was also observed between the amount of GAG in the engineered cartilage at 8 and 12 weeks (P<0.05).

Table II

GAG contents (wet weight) of repaired cartilage.

Table II

GAG contents (wet weight) of repaired cartilage.

8 weeks (n=12)12 weeks (n=12)


GroupsGAG content (mg/g)Percentage of normal (%)GAG content (mg/g)Percentage of normal (%)
Normal12.07±0.3712.95±1.23
Exp5.72±0.8747.39±2.3711.83±3.0591.35±5.27
Ctrl2.81±1.0323.26±4.76

[i] GAG content is higher in Exp than in Ctrl (P<0.05) and no significant difference was found between the normal and experimental groups (P>0.05). GAG, glycosaminoglycan.

Discussion

Meniscal injury is one of the most common injuries to the knee. The menisci are important for normal knee function. A meniscus injury increases the risk of subsequent development of degenerative changes in the knee (11). Repairing meniscus injuries remains a challenge in sports medicine, since meniscus usually does not regenerate by itself following injury. The emergence of a tissue engineering technique may provide a satisfactory solution to the problem.

Tissue engineering is based on a unique combination of exogenous cells, specific stimuli and matrix scaffold in an in vitro or in vivo environment. In the present study, myoblasts were used. Myoblasts, which are adult stem cells and include skeletal muscle cell precursors, have been shown to possess multipotential mesenchymal stem cell activity and are capable of forming chondrocytes, osteocytes and adipocytes as well as myocytes (12–14). Previous reports suggest that a degree of plasticity remains prior to terminal myoblastic differentiation. Therefore, myoblasts may prove useful for the development of new therapeutic approaches aimed at the regeneration of damaged or diseased tissues. Myoblasts have been investigated as a candidate cell source for tissue engineering (15–17). In comparison with other stem cell sources, myoblasts represent a more promising source for cartilage engineering, as they are relatively abundant and easily accessible, with minimal donor site morbidity (18,19). Studies have shown that myoblasts have a higher cell yield and more rapid proliferation ability during in vitro expansion (8,20). In this study, we observed a chondrogenic response with a dose of 50 ng/ml CDMP-2 and 20 ng/ml TGF-β1 provided continuously with each medium change. Chondrogenic differentiation, analyzed using immunohistochemistry and gene expression profiles, was observed. This suggests that key events responsible for the commitment of myoblasts to the chondrogenic lineage occur during the early initial period of cell growth and proliferation.

PGA is a commonly used synthetic polymer in cartilage tissue engineering. In order to maintain its dimensional stability and enhance its mechanical properties, fibrous PGA meshes are coated with solutions of PLA. Evaporation of the solvent for PLA leads to the formation of PLGA composites with specific shapes. The feasibility of using a PLGA composite as a scaffold to engineer cartilage tissue has been documented in a number of studies (21,22). It was also shown that adhesion and proliferation of chondrocytes on PGA fibers was significantly suppressed when an increased amount of PLA was added (21,22). Therefore, the concentration of PLA solution to be added needs to be lowered but still sufficient to function as glue to maintain the structural stability of the PGA 3D scaffold. In the present study, 1.5% PLA in dichloromethane was used. Any further lowering would cause an unstable configuration of the scaffold. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that PLA at this concentration is capable of wrapping PGA fibers together and that the shape of scaffold was maintained when they were kept in culture medium for as long as 5 weeks (22).

The main advantage of using a PLGA scaffold for meniscal tissue engineering is its suitable degradation rate, which matches the kinetics of new meniscal formation in vivo(5). The degradation of non-woven PGA scaffold is reported to be complete over a period of 2 months in vivo(23). In the present study, no undegraded PLGA fibers were observed histologically in the experimental or control groups at 12 weeks post-implantation. Due to its rapid degradation, PLGA scaffold was found to accelerate chondrogenesis of constructs prepared from dedifferentiated chondrocytes and PLGA, as the accumulation of the deposited cartilage-specific extracellular matrix (ECM) and expression of marker genes both in vitro and in vivo were significantly enhanced compared with those of constructs prepared from PGA. It was also proposed that early degradation of PLGA fibers may have a positive effect on chondrogenesis by leaving new spaces for cells to further fill in and produce new intercellular matrix, which in turn may facilitate the formation of more cell-matrix and cell-cell contact.

In this study, the specimens showed a cartilaginous appearance. However, no construct was identified in all control groups after 8 weeks of in vivo culture. As shown by the histological analysis, the section of engineered cartilage had the appearance of fibrocartilage with fibrochondrocytic-like cells at 8 and 12 weeks. In the control group, only a band of fibrous tissue was observed. Immunohistological staining indicated that engineered cartilage was positively stained for type II collagen compared with the control group at 8 and 12 weeks post-implantation. At 12 weeks, expression of mRNAs for type I collagen, type II collagen and aggrecan was detected by RT-PCR. By contrast, no assessed genes were expressed in the control tissue. In addition, the biomechanical properties (compressive modulus) and biochemical composition (GAG quantification) of engineered cartilage at 12 weeks post-implantation were similar to those of corresponding normal cartilage, which indicated that the engineered cartilage was formed both structurally and functionally.

In conclusion, we showed chondrogenic differentiation of myoblasts seeded into PLGA scaffolds following implantation in a subcutaneous pocket of nude mice. Further studies are required to investigate implanted myoblast-seeded PLGA scaffolds in a joint, including biomechanical stress for the evaluation of a possible positive stimulus by mechanical loading after implantation.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Shanghai Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 09ZR1425500) and Research Grant for Health Science and Technology of Pudong Health Bureau of Shanghai (Grant No. PW2009B-2).

References

1 

Hart R, Janecek M, Siska V, Kucera B and Stipcák V: Correlation of long-term clinical and radiological results after meniscectomies. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 72:304–307. 2005.PubMed/NCBI

2 

van der Wal RJ, Thomassen BJ and van Arkel ER: Long-term clinical outcome of open meniscal allograft transplantation. Am J Sports Med. 37:2134–2139. 2009.PubMed/NCBI

3 

Yamasaki T, Deie M, Shinomiya R, Yasunaga Y, Yanada S and Ochi M: Transplantation of meniscus regenerated by tissue engineering with a scaffold derived from a rat meniscus and mesenchymal stromal cells derived from rat bone marrow. Artif Organs. 32:519–524. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Webber RJ, York JL, Vanderschilden JL and Hough AJ Jr: An organ culture model for assaying wound repair of the fibrocartilaginous knee joint meniscus. Am J Sports Med. 17:393–400. 1989. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Kang SW, Son SM, Lee JS, Lee ES, Lee KY, Park SG, Park JH and Kim BS: Regeneration of whole meniscus using meniscal cells and polymer scaffolds in a rabbit total meniscectomy model. J Biomed Mater Res A. 78:659–671. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Ishida K, Kuroda R, Miwa M, Tabata Y, Hokugo A, Kawamoto T, Sasaki K, Doita M and Kurosaka M: The regenerative effects of platelet-rich plasma on meniscal cells in vitro and its in vivo application with biodegradable gelatin hydrogel. Tissue Eng. 13:1103–1112. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Peretti GM, Gill TJ, Xu JW, Randolph MA, Morse KR and Zaleske DJ: Cell-based therapy for meniscal repair: a large animal study. Am J Sports Med. 32:146–158. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Lu SH, Yang AH, Wei CF, Chiang HS and Chancellor MB: Multi-potent differentiation of human purified muscle-derived cells: potential for tissue regeneration. BJU Int. 105:1174–1180. 2009.PubMed/NCBI

9 

Zhou G, Liu W, Cui L, Wang X, Liu T and Cao Y: Repair of porcine articular osteochondral defects in non-weightbearing areas with autologous bone marrow stromal cells. Tissue Eng. 12:3209–3221. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Zhu W, Wang Y, Qiu G and Chen B: Characterization of the purification and primary culture of adult canine myoblasts in vitro. Mol Med Report. 3:463–468. 2010.PubMed/NCBI

11 

Gu YL and Wang YB: Treatment of meniscal injury: a current concept review. Chin J Traumatol. 13:370–376. 2010.PubMed/NCBI

12 

Gu Y, Wang Y, Dai H, Lu L, Cheng Y and Zhu W: Chondrogenic differentiation of canine myoblasts induced by cartilage-derived morphogenetic protein-2 and transforming growth factor-β1 in vitro. Mol Med Report. 5:767–772. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

13 

Asakura A, Komaki M and Rudnicki M: Muscle satellite cells are multipotential stem cells that exhibit myogenic, osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation. Differentiation. 68:245–253. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Matsushita T, Matsui N, Fujioka H, Kubo S, Kuroda R, Kurosaka M and Yoshiya S: Expression of transcription factor sox9 in rat L6 myoblastic cells. Connect Tissue Res. 45:164–173. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Goldring K, Partridge T and Watt D: Muscle stem cells. J Pathol. 197:457–467. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Day CS, Kasemkijwattana C, Menetrey J, Floyd SS Jr, Booth D, Moreland MS, Fu FH and Huard J: Myoblast-mediated gene transfer to the joint. J Orthop Res. 15:894–903. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Koning M, Harmsen MC, van Luyn MJ and Werker PM: Current opportunities and challenges in skeletal muscle tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 3:407–415. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Singh D, Nayak V and Kumar A: Proliferation of myoblast skeletal cells on three-dimensional supermacroporous cryogels. Int J Biol Sci. 6:371–381. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Marsano A, Millward-Sadler SJ, Salter DM, Adesida A, Hardingham T, Tognana E, Kon E, Chiari-Grisar C, Nehrer S, Jakob M and Martin I: Differential cartilaginous tissue formation by human synovial membrane, fat pad, meniscus cells and articular chondrocytes. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 15:48–58. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Stern-Straeter J, Bran G, Riedel F, Sauter A, Hörmann K and Goessler UR: Characterization of human myoblast cultures for tissue engineering. Int J Mol Med. 21:49–56. 2008.

21 

Moran JM, Pazzano D and Bonassar LJ: Characterization of polylactic acid-polyglycolic acid composites for cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. 9:63–70. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Cui L, Wu Y, Cen L, Zhou H, Yin S, Liu G, Liu W and Cao Y: Repair of articular cartilage defect in non-weight bearing areas using adipose derived stem cells loaded polyglycolic acid mesh. Biomaterials. 30:2683–2693. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Zwingmann J, Mehlhorn AT, Südkamp N, Stark B, Dauner M and Schmal H: Chondrogenic differentiation of human articular chondrocytes differs in biodegradable PGA/PLA scaffolds. Tissue Eng. 13:2335–2343. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

  • Abstract
  • View
  • Download
  • Twitter
Copy and paste a formatted citation
Spandidos Publications style
Gu Y, Chen P, Yang Y, Shi K, Wang Y, Zhu W and Zhu G: Chondrogenesis of myoblasts in biodegradable poly-lactide-co-glycolide scaffolds. Mol Med Rep 7: 1003-1009, 2013.
APA
Gu, Y., Chen, P., Yang, Y., Shi, K., Wang, Y., Zhu, W., & Zhu, G. (2013). Chondrogenesis of myoblasts in biodegradable poly-lactide-co-glycolide scaffolds. Molecular Medicine Reports, 7, 1003-1009. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2012.1240
MLA
Gu, Y., Chen, P., Yang, Y., Shi, K., Wang, Y., Zhu, W., Zhu, G."Chondrogenesis of myoblasts in biodegradable poly-lactide-co-glycolide scaffolds". Molecular Medicine Reports 7.3 (2013): 1003-1009.
Chicago
Gu, Y., Chen, P., Yang, Y., Shi, K., Wang, Y., Zhu, W., Zhu, G."Chondrogenesis of myoblasts in biodegradable poly-lactide-co-glycolide scaffolds". Molecular Medicine Reports 7, no. 3 (2013): 1003-1009. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2012.1240
Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Gu Y, Chen P, Yang Y, Shi K, Wang Y, Zhu W and Zhu G: Chondrogenesis of myoblasts in biodegradable poly-lactide-co-glycolide scaffolds. Mol Med Rep 7: 1003-1009, 2013.
APA
Gu, Y., Chen, P., Yang, Y., Shi, K., Wang, Y., Zhu, W., & Zhu, G. (2013). Chondrogenesis of myoblasts in biodegradable poly-lactide-co-glycolide scaffolds. Molecular Medicine Reports, 7, 1003-1009. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2012.1240
MLA
Gu, Y., Chen, P., Yang, Y., Shi, K., Wang, Y., Zhu, W., Zhu, G."Chondrogenesis of myoblasts in biodegradable poly-lactide-co-glycolide scaffolds". Molecular Medicine Reports 7.3 (2013): 1003-1009.
Chicago
Gu, Y., Chen, P., Yang, Y., Shi, K., Wang, Y., Zhu, W., Zhu, G."Chondrogenesis of myoblasts in biodegradable poly-lactide-co-glycolide scaffolds". Molecular Medicine Reports 7, no. 3 (2013): 1003-1009. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2012.1240
Follow us
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
About
  • Spandidos Publications
  • Careers
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
How can we help?
  • Help
  • Live Chat
  • Contact
  • Email to our Support Team