|
1
|
Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K, et al:
Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice
multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar
reconstruction. Circulation. 107:664–666. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
2
|
Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Schmitz BL, et al:
Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed
tomography. JAMA. 293:2471–2478. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3
|
Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA,
et al: High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary
angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional
coronary angiography. Circulation. 112:2318–2323. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
4
|
Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F, et al:
Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions
by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with
quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J
Am Coll Cardiol. 46:147–154. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
5
|
Maffei E, Palumbo A, Martini C, et al:
Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary
angiography in a large population of patients without
revascularization: registry data and review of multicentre trials.
Radiol Med. 115:368–384. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
6
|
Underwood SR, Anagnostopoulos C, Cerqueira
M, et al; British Cardiac Society; British Nuclear Cardiology
Society; British Nuclear Medicine Society; Royal College of
Physicians of London; Royal College of Radiologists. Myocardial
perfusion scintigraphy: the evidence. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging.
31:261–291. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
7
|
Go V, Bhatt MR and Hendel RC: The
diagnostic and prognostic value of ECG-gated SPECT myocardial
perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med. 45:912–921. 2004.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
8
|
Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Lorell BH, et al;
American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association Task
Force on Practice Guidelines; American Society for Nuclear
Cardiology. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac
radionuclide imaging - executive summary. A report of the American
College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on
Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995
Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide (Imaging).
Circulation. 108:1404–1418. 2003.
|
|
9
|
Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, et al: A
reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease.
Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery
Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart
Association. Circulation. 51(Suppl 4): 5–40. 1975. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
10
|
Gaemperli O, Schepis T, Valenta I, et al:
Functionally relevant coronary artery disease: comparison of
64-section CT angiography with myocardial perfusion SPECT.
Radiology. 248:414–423. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
11
|
Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, et al;
American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic
Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group;
American College of Radiology; Society of Cardiovascular Computed
Tomography; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance; American
Society of Nuclear Cardiology; North American Society for Cardiac
Imaging; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions;
Society of Interventional Radiology.
ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness
criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic
resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology
Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness
Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of
Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular
Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North
American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular
Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional
Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 48:1475–1497. 2006.
|
|
12
|
Sato A, Hiroe M, Tamura M, et al:
Quantitative measures of coronary stenosis severity by 64-Slice CT
angiography and relation to physiologic significance of perfusion
in nonobese patients: comparison with stress myocardial perfusion
imaging. J Nucl Med. 49:564–572. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
13
|
Wijns W: Anatomic-functional imaging by
single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography as
the corner stone of diagnosis and treatment for coronary patients:
a glimpse into the (near) future? J Am Coll Cardiol. 49:1068–1070.
2007. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
14
|
Cyrus T, Gropler RJ and Woodard PK:
Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and advances in CT plaque imaging. J
Nucl Cardiol. 16:466–473. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
15
|
Dorbala S, Hachamovitch R and Di Carli MF:
Myocardial perfusion imaging and multidetector computed tomographic
coronary angiography: appropriate for all patients with suspected
coronary artery disease? J Am Coll Cardiol. 48:2515–2517. 2006.
View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
16
|
Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD,
Cohen I and Berman DS: Stress myocardial perfusion single-photon
emission computed tomography is clinically effective and cost
effective in risk stratification of patients with a high likelihood
of coronary artery disease (CAD) but no known CAD. J Am Coll
Cardiol. 43:200–208. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
17
|
Berman DS, Abidov A, Kang X, et al:
Prognostic validation of a 17-segment score derived from a
20-segment score for myocardial perfusion SPECT interpretation. J
Nucl Cardiol. 11:414–423. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18
|
Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD,
Cohen I and Berman DS: Comparison of the short-term survival
benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical
therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease
undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission
computed tomography. Circulation. 107:2900–2907. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
19
|
Smith SC Jr, Dove JT, Jacobs AK, et al;
American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association Task
Force on Practice Guidelines. Committee to Revise the 1993
Guidelines for Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty.
ACC/AHA guidelines of percutaneous coronary interventions(revision
of the 1993 PTCA guidelines) - executive summary. A report of the
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task
Force on Practice Guidelines (committee to revise the 1993
guidelines for percutanous transluminal coronary angioplasty). J Am
Coll Cardiol. 37:2215–2239. 2001.
|
|
20
|
Berman DS, Hachamovitch R, Shaw LJ, et al:
Roles of nuclear cardiology, cardiac computed tomography, and
cardiac magnetic resonance: Noninvasive risk stratification and a
conceptual framework for the selection of noninvasive imaging tests
in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Nucl
Med. 47:1107–1118. 2006.
|
|
21
|
Rispler S, Keidar Z, Ghersin E, et al:
Integrated single-photon emission computed tomography and computed
tomography coronary angiography for the assessment of
hemodynamically significant coronary artery lesions. J Am Coll
Cardiol. 49:1059–1067. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
22
|
Namdar M, Hany TF, Koepfli P, et al:
Integrated PET/CT for the assessment of coronary artery disease: a
feasibility study. J Nucl Med. 46:930–935. 2005.PubMed/NCBI
|
