Restoration of adiponectin expression via the ERK pathway in TNFα-treated 3T3-L1 adipocytes

Introduction

A chronic imbalance between energy intake and expenditure leads to obesity, which is characterized by an increased number and size of adipocytes. As an active endocrine organ, adipose tissue is part of an innate immune system capable of producing biologically active proteins referred to as adipokines, including leptin, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), resistin and adiponectin. Adipocyte-derived peptides are reciprocally reflected by energy homeostasis. Energy balance and body weight regulation affect the response and activities of adipose tissue by regulating adipokine production and secretion, all of which contribute to obesity-associated comorbidities and mortality (1–4).

The first adipose-derived proinflammatory mediator, TNF-α, is well established as a major inflammatory adipokine that has been associated with adiposity, obesity, inflammation and the development of insulin resistance (4–6). The deleterious effects of TNF-α on insulin sensitivity result from its effects on lipolysis (7), adipocyte metabolism (8) and the insulin signaling network (9,10). By contrast to TNF-α, another adipose-secreted protein, adiponectin, is an established insulin-sensitizing adipokine with anti-inflammatory and anti-atherogenic properties (11,12). Circulating levels of adiponectin and its synthesis in adipose tissue are decreased in patients and animals with obesity and type 2 diabetes (13,14). In terms of the regulation of adiponectin, in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated the involvement of proinflammatory cytokines (15,16). TNF-α directly inhibits adiponectin gene expression; however, this effect is reversed following stimulus removal (17). The mechanisms by which exposure and removal of obesity-inducing proinflammatory adipokines affect adiponectin remain to be fully elucidated.

Extensive studies have revealed that obesity is a state of chronic, low-grade inflammation, which may act as the potential link between adipose tissue expansion and obesity-induced health complications (18,19). Proteins produced and secreted from adipose tissue fluctuate in response to energy balance, including weight change or adiposity size, which in turn reflects health outcome (20–22). However, to the best of our knowledge, the mechanisms by which metabolic stress from chronic energy imbalance increases proinflammatory cytokines and affects adiponectin remain elusive. In the present study, the mechanisms underlying the adverse effects of TNF-α on adiponectin were examined and the recovery time required to reverse the TNF-α-induced decrease in adiponectin mRNA expression was determined.

Materials and methods

Materials

3T3-L1 mouse fibroblast cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). Tissue culture reagents, including Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), bovine calf serum (CS) and fetal bovine serum (FBS), were purchased from Invitrogen Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Antibodies against adiponectin, phospho-c-Jun N-terminal kinases (p-JNK; Thr183/Tyr185), total JNK (T-JNK), phospho-p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases (p-p38 MAPK; Thr180/Tyr182), total p38 MAPK (T-p38 MAPK), phospho-p44/42 MAPK [phospho-extracellular signal-related kinases 1 and 2 (p-ERK1/2); Thr202/Tyr204] and total p44/42 MAPK (T-ERK1/2) were rabbit monoclonal antibodies and were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA). Unless otherwise noted, all other chemicals were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA).

Cell culture

Murine 3T3-L1 cells were plated in six-well plates and maintained in high glucose (HG)-DMEM containing 10% FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. Two days following 100% confluence, preadipocytes were induced to differentiate by using MDI media containing 520 μM isobutylmethylxanthine, 1 μM dexamethasone and 1 μg/ml insulin in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). After two days, the medium was replaced with DMEM containing 10% FBS, antibiotics and insulin (insulin media). Until >95% of the cells contained lipid droplets, HG-DMEM with 10% FBS was replaced every two days. Differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes were serum-starved in serum-free DMEM (free media) prior to the TNF-α treatment. Fig. 1 illustrates the experimental design for TNF-α treatment and the subsequent wash-off period with/without the inhibitor. The cells were treated with 10 ng/ml TNF-α for the indicated incubation times [16, 32 h or 48 h (Fig. 1A, C and F, respectively)], rinsed and then incubated with DMEM containing 10% FBS (complete media) for the indicated periods according to TNF-α incubation time. In the adipocytes that received 16 h TNF-α treatment, the wash-off incubation was 16 h (Fig. 1B). TNF-α-treated 3T3-L1 adipocytes for 32 h were cultured with complete media for either an additional 16 h (Fig. 1D) or 32 h (Fig. 1E). DMEM containing 10% FBS was used for either 16 h (Fig. 1G) or 48 h (Fig. 1H) following 48 h of TNF-α incubation.

Figure 1 Schematic of the experimental design. 3T3-L1 cells were seeded and differentiated. Differentiated adipocytes were serum-starved for 6 h prior to TNF-α treatment (10 ng/ml). The cells were incubated with TNF-α for (A and B) 16 h, (C, D, E) 32 h or (F, G, H) 48 h. After the indicated incubation times, 3T3-L1 cells were rinsed and re-fed with medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum with/without inhibitors for (B, D, G) 16 h, (E) 32 h or (H) 48 h. Black arrow, TNF-α treatment; dotted arrow, wash-off period with/without inhibitor following TNF-α treatment. TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α.

Total RNA isolation and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)

Total RNA was isolated using the RNA Mini kit (Invitrogen Life Technologies) and cDNA was prepared using the high-capacity cDNA kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The reactions were incubated initially at 37°C for 60 min and subsequently at 95°C for 5 min. The PCR primer design for qPCR was performed using the Universal Probe Library (UPL) software (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany). qPCR was conducted using the Roche real-time PCR master mix in combination with UPL in at least triplicate using a Roche Lightcycler 480 (Roche Applied Science) as follows: one cycle of pre-denaturation at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 45 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 10 sec and annealing at 60°C for 20 sec, followed by one cycle of extension at 40°C for 30 sec. The expression levels were determined using the ΔΔCt method. The following sense and antisense primers were used for adiponectin: 5′-GGAGAGAAAGGAGATGCAGGT-3′ and 5′-CTTTCCTGCCAGGGGTTC-3′; and for β-actin: 5′-ACTGCTCTGGCTCCTAGCAC-3′ and 5′-CCACCGATCCACACAGAGTA-3′.

Western blot analysis

Differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes were serum-starved for 6 h prior to treatment. Cells were incubated with TNF-α for 16, 32 or 48 h. After the indicated time periods, the cells were washed with serum-free DMEM and re-fed with HG-DMEM containing the ERK1/2 inhibitor (PD98059; 50 μM) for the indicated times (Fig. 1). The cells were washed in ice-cold PBS and lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation assay lysis buffer (Amresco, Solon, OH, USA) containing freshly added protease inhibitor cocktail and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Sigma). The protein concentrations were measured using the bicinchoninic acid assay (Pierce Biotechnology, Inc., Rockford, IL, USA). Bromophenol blue and NuPage reducing agent (Invitrogen Life Technologies) were added to the cell lysates and this mixture was heated at 95°C for 5 min. Equal protein levels were loaded into each lane of a 4–20% SDS polyacrylamide gel. The proteins were separated by electrophoresis and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) with the Trans-Blot apparatus (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). For immunoblotting, the membranes were blocked in 5% non-fat dry milk in TBST (0.05% Tween 20, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5 and 150 mM NaCl), washed twice and incubated overnight with primary antibodies. After washing, the blots were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. The signal was detected using the Amersham enhanced chemiluminescence plus system (Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech, Arlington Heights, IL, USA). Densitometric analysis of the individual bands was performed with Geliance Imaging software (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences, Boston, MA, USA). The data presented are representative of at least three independent experiments with similar results.

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as mean ± standard error (SE). Statistical significance was assessed using PASW Statistics 18 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Student’s t-test or analysis of variance was performed to compare between the groups. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference between values.

Results

TNF-α inhibits mRNA expression of adiponectin in a dose- and time-dependent manner

To investigate the impact of TNF-α on adiponectin, the mRNA expression was first measured in differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes. TNF-α significantly suppressed adiponectin gene expression in a dose- and time-dependent manner as compared with the control group. There was a significant reduction in mRNA levels by 37% following 8 h incubation at 10 ng/ml (Fig. 2). The maximal inhibition of adiponectin mRNA expression was 62%, observed after 16 h incubation at a TNF-α concentration of 10 ng/ml. There was no significant difference between the expression from the 16 h and 24 h incubation periods.

Figure 2 TNF-α decreases adiponectin mRNA expression. Differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes were serum-starved for 6 h and then treated with different doses (0.01, 0.1, 1 and 10 ng/ml) and for different time periods (2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 h). The quantitative polymerase chain reaction products were normalized using β-actin levels for all samples. The results are expressed as the percentage of the control (untreated cells, 0 h) from at least three experiments. **P<0.01, vs. the control. TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α.

Inhibitory effect of TNF-α on gene expression of adiponectin is reversible in 3T3-L1 cells

To investigate the reversibility in the inhibitory effects of the proinflammatory adipokine, TNF-α, on adiponectin mRNA expression, the effect of TNF-α at different exposure and removal time periods in differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes was examined. After three different TNF-α incubation periods (16, 32 and 48 h), the cells were rinsed and re-fed with HG-DMEM containing 10% FBS for an additional time as follows: i) 16 h wash-off incubation following 16 h TNF-α treatment; ii) 16 or 32 h recovery period following 32 h TNF-α treatment and iii) 16 or 48 h TNF-α removal following 48 h TNF-α exposure (Fig. 1). Chronic TNF-α incubation significantly reduced adiponectin gene expression by 60% compared with the untreated control cells (Fig. 3). Following removal of TNF-α from the medium, there was a time-dependent reversal of the TNF-α-mediated reduction in adiponectin levels. In Fig. 3, column 3, the 16 h wash-off phase completely reversed the decrease in adiponectin levels following 16 h of TNF-α treatment, returning to the levels observed in the control. The 16 h TNF-α withdrawal did not induce a significant effect (column 6), but the 32 h wash-off period fully reversed the decrease in adiponectin expression following the 32 h TNF-α treatment (column 7). Similar results were observed for 48 h TNF-α incubation, a 16 h restoration did not have a significant impact (column 10); however, a 48 h wash-off period fully reversed the negative effect of TNF-α on adiponectin mRNA expression (column 11). These findings suggested that the inhibitory effect of TNF-α on adiponectin is reversible and the adverse effects are dependent on the length of TNF-α exposure and the subsequent recovery period.

Figure 3 Inhibition of adiponectin gene expression by TNF-α is reversible. Differentiated adipocytes were treated with TNF-α for 16, 32 and 48 h (columns 2, 5 and 9). Following 6 h of serum starvation, high-glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum was added. The additional wash-off incubation periods were 16 h for 16 h TNF-α treatment (column 3), 16 or 32 h for 32 h TNF-α treatment (column 6 or 7) and 16 or 48 h for 48 h TNF-α treatment (column 10 or 11). Quantitative polymerase chain reaction was performed and the expression of adiponectin mRNA was normalized to β-actin expression. The results are expressed as mean ± standard error. Bars with different letters show statistical difference among groups (P<0.05). TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; Con, control.

Length of recovery phase affects TNF-α-induced MAPK activation in differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes

There is a positive correlation between TNF-α and activation of three different MAPKs, JNK, ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK, in the development of obesity-associated insulin resistance. Therefore, in the present study, the effect of a wash-off period following exposure to the proinflammatory cytokine TNF-α and the subsequent activation of MAPKs was examined. Similar to the pattern of adiponectin mRNA expression (Fig. 4A), the decrease in adiponectin protein expression after 32 h treatment with TNF-α was completely reversed following an equivalent (32 h) wash-out period (Fig. 4B and C). In addition, the reduction in adiponectin levels following 32 h TNF-α treatment was concomitantly accompanied by activation of JNK, ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK, expressed as phospho-protein/total protein. A 16 h wash-off phase following 32 h TNF-α-treatment reversed the TNF-α-activated JNK and p38 MAPK, but not ERK1/2 (Fig. 4B). ERK1/2 activation was attenuated following a 32 h wash-off period (Fig. 4B and D). This restoration pattern of ERK1/2 in response to chronic TNF-α exposure and wash-off was similar to that of adiponectin protein and mRNA expression. These results suggested that the effect of TNF-α on adiponectin expression was reversible through ERK activation.

Figure 4 Recovery phase following TNF-α treatment restores adiponectin levels and ERK activation. Differentiated adipocytes were treated with TNF-α (10 ng/ml) for 32 h and then the cells were subjected to a wash-off period (16 or 32 h). (A) mRNA expression of adiponectin was assessed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. (B) The cell lysates were analyzed by western blot analysis and probed for adiponectin, β-actin, p-JNK (Thr183/Tyr185), T-JNK, p-p38 MAPK (Thr180/Tyr182), T-p38 MAPK, p-ERK1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204) and T-ERK1/2. The signal density was quantified and expressed as (C) adiponectin/β-actin and (D) phospho-/total ERK. The results are expressed as the mean ± standard error. Different letters indicate statistical difference (P<0.05). TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinases; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; ERK1/2, extracellular signal-related kinase 1 and 2; p, phospho; T, total.

Recovery phase facilitates TNF-α-induced suppression of adiponectin expression via ERK1/2 activation

To delineate the effects of the ERK pathway on the recovery of adiponectin expression following TNF-α exposure, 3T3-L1 adipocytes were treated with TNF-α (32 h, 10 ng/ml) and co-treated with the ERK inhibitor PD98059 (50 μM) in HG-DMEM containing 10% FBS for an additional restoration time period (16 or 32 h) (Fig. 5). The 16 h recovery period did not completely reverse the inhibitory effects of 32 h TNF-α treatment, whereas the use of PD98059 during this recovery period fully restored adiponectin levels to the control levels. The recovery effect of the ERK inhibitor on adiponectin levels was equivalent to the effect of the 32 h wash-off time without the inhibitor. However, there were no additional effects on restoration in the 32 h restoration phase with PD98059. Furthermore, the addition of the ERK1/2 inhibitor during the 16 h restoration period significantly increased the protein expression of adiponectin compared with the control and concomitantly reduced ERK activation.

Figure 5 ERK inhibition is involved in the TNF-α-induced decline and recovery of adiponectin expression in adipocytes. The 6 h serum-starved 3T3-L1 adipocytes were treated with TNF-α for 32 h, rinsed with DMEM and co-treated with PD98059 (50 μM) for the additional incubation period. (A) The gene expression of adiponectin was determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and normalized to β-actin expression for all of the samples. (B) Western blot analysis for adiponectin, β-actin, p-ERK1/2 and T-ERK1/2 was performed. Densitometric analysis of (C) adiponectin or (D) p-ERK1/2 was normalized to the expression of β-actin or T-ERK1/2, respectively. The results are expressed as the mean ± standard error. Different letters indicate statistical difference (P<0.05). TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinases; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinases; ERK, extracellular signal-related kinases; DMEM, Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium; p, phospho; T, total.

Discussion

The results of the present study demonstrated the regulation and restoration of adiponectin expression by an obesity-induced proinflammatory adipokine in adipocytes. It was identified that TNF-α significantly decreased the expression of both adiponectin protein and mRNA, and this inhibitory effect was completely reversed in a time-dependent manner. In order to reverse the inhibitory effects of TNF-α on adiponectin, the reversal periods were required to be at least as long as the TNF-α treatment period. Concurrently, it was identified that the reversal pattern of ERK activation was consistent with the TNF-α-induced changes in adiponectin expression. Further investigation revealed that the addition of an ERK inhibitor during restoration following chronic TNF-α treatment resulted in a complete reversal of the inhibitory effects of the proinflammatory cytokine on adiponectin, and the recovery was notably quicker than that in the absence of the ERK inhibitor. These results suggested that the ERK pathway may modulate recovery of adiponectin levels following TNF-α exposure.

TNF-α is the strongest candidate for the link between obesity and insulin resistance. There is a close association between proinflammatory adipokines and the deleterious effects of obesity-associated comorbidities, and numerous studies have described the inhibitory effects of TNF-α on the regulation of another cytokine, adiponectin (16,17,23). Adiponectin deletion results in increased TNF-α expression and diet-induced insulin resistance. Adiponectin administration in adiponectin knockout transgenic mice ameliorates high TNF-α concentrations in the plasma and adipose TNF-α mRNA expression, and also increases insulin sensitivity (24). Furthermore, an in vitro study demonstrated that the inhibitory effect of TNF-α on adiponectin gene expression is fully reversible following the removal of TNF-α (17). These studies demonstrated that TNF-α and adiponectin antagonistically regulate each other and in turn affect obesity-associated insulin sensitivity. As expected, in the present study, TNF-α induced a significant reduction in adiponectin mRNA expression in a dose- and time-dependent manner. As reported in a previous investigation, it was also identified that the inhibitory effects of TNF-α on adiponectin expression are reversible. Furthermore, this restoration is dependent on the TNF-α incubation time in 3T3-L1 adipocytes, as the decrease in adiponectin levels following 16 h TNF-α treatment was completely reversed after a 16 h restoration phase. In 3T3-L1 cells treated with TNF-α for 32 or 48 h, a 16 h wash-off period resulted in partial restoration of 55 and 45%, respectively, compared with the untreated control adipocytes. It appears that, in order to fully reverse the inhibitory effect of TNF-α on adiponectin expression, the reversal period is required to be at least as long as the TNF-α treatment period. These data indicated that normalization of the proinflammatory cytokine, TNF-α, by weight loss, decreased adiposity or improved energy homeostasis may increase adiponectin levels and thereby reduce obesity-associated comorbidities.

In the development of obesity-associated insulin resistance, the direct actions of TNF-α on insulin signaling and insulin action occur via the activation of ERK1/2, p38 MAPK and JNK (25), all of which suppress adiponectin levels (26,27). As previously reported, in the present study, chronic TNF-α exposure in 3T3-L1 adipocytes activated JNK, ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK. However, the reversal of ERK activation only matched the TNF-α-associated decrease and restoration of adiponectin expression. The use of PD98059 had favorable effects on adiponectin recovery, as the restoration of the TNF-α-induced decrease in adiponectin levels was accelerated in the presence of PD98059. This evidence indicated that ERK activation may regulate the recovery duration following chronic cytokine exposure.

The present study was limited by the fact that it did not address how exposure to TNF-α and withdrawal may affect body weight, adiposity and whole body insulin sensitivity by modulating adiponectin expression and the ERK pathway. Therefore, further study is required to demonstrate this using an in vivo model. However, the present study provided evidence that the inhibitory effect of TNF-α on adiponectin mRNA expression was reversible depending on the length of the wash-off phase and ERK activation in adipocytes. The restoration of adiponectin following chronic exposure to TNF-α was accelerated by the presence of an ERK inhibitor. In conclusion, the present study suggested that reduction of TNF-α by energy balance, weight loss, decreased adiposity or blockage of TNF-α or its receptors, and the inhibition of ERK activation may increase adiponectin levels and thereby result in increased insulin sensitivity.

Acknowledgements

The present study was partially supported by the Korean Diabetes Association (Won Jun Kim, 2010).

Abbreviations:

References