|
1
|
Rackow BW, Kliman HJ and Taylor HS: GnRH
antagonists may affect endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril.
89:1234–1239. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
2
|
Al-Inany HG, Abou-Setta AM and Aboulghar
M: Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted
conception: a Cochrane review. Reprod Biomed Online. 14:640–649.
2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3
|
Bourgain C and Devroey P: The endometrium
in stimulated cycles for IVF. Hum Reprod Update. 9:515–522. 2003.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4
|
Devroey P, Bourgain C, Macklon NS and
Fauser BC: Reproductive biology and IVF: ovarian stimulation and
endometrial receptivity. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 15:84–90. 2004.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
Kolibianakis E, Bourgain C, Albano C, et
al: Effect of ovarian stimulation with recombinant
follicle-stimulating hormone, gonadotropin releasing hormone
antagonists, and human chorionic gonadotropin on endometrial
maturation on the day of oocyte pick-up. Fertil Steril.
78:1025–1029. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
6
|
Taylor HS: The role of HOX genes in human
implantation. Hum Reprod Update. 6:75–79. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
7
|
Taylor HS, Vanden Heuvel GB and Igarashi
P: A conserved HOX axis in the mouse and human female reproductive
system: late establishment and persistent adult expression of the
HOXA cluster genes. Biol Reprod. 57:1338–1345. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
8
|
Satokata I, Benson G and Maas R: Sexually
dimorphic sterility phenotypes in HOXA10-deficient mice. Nature.
374:460–463. 1995. View
Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
9
|
Wu Y, Halverson G, Basir Z, et al:
Aberrant methylation at HOXA10 may be responsible for its aberrant
expression in the endometrium of patients with endometriosis. Am J
Obstet Gynecol. 193:371–380. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
10
|
Daftary GS, Troy PJ, Bagot CN, et al:
Direct regulation of beta3-integrin subunit gene expression by
HOXA10 in endometrial cells. Mol Endocrinol. 16:571–579.
2002.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
11
|
Taylor HS, Daftary GS and Selam B:
Endometrial HOXA10 expression after controlled ovarian
hyperstimulation with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone.
Fertil Steril. 80(Suppl 2): 839–843. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
12
|
Kim JJ, Taylor HS, Lu Z, et al: Altered
expression of HOXA10 in endometriosis: potential role in
decidualization. Mol Hum Reprod. 13:323–332. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
13
|
Nasu K, Kawano Y, Tsukamoto Y, et al:
Aberrant DNA methylation status of endometriosis: epigenetics as
the pathogenesis, biomarker and therapeutic target. J Obstet
Gynaecol Res. 37:683–695. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
14
|
Rackow BW, Jorgensen E and Taylor HS:
Endometrial polyps affect uterine receptivity. Fertil Steril.
95:2690–2692. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
15
|
Widschwendter M, Apostolidou S, Jones AA,
et al: HOXA methylation in normal endometrium from premenopausal
women is associated with the presence of ovarian cancer: a proof of
principle study. Int J Cancer. 125:2214–2218. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
16
|
Bromer JG, Wu J, Zhou Y and Taylor HS:
Hypermethylation of homeobox A10 by in utero diethylstilbestrol
exposure: an epigenetic mechanism for altered developmental
programming. Endocrinology. 150:3376–3382. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
17
|
Varayoud J, Ramos JG, Bosquiazzo VL,
Muñoz-de-Toro M and Luque EH: Developmental exposure to Bisphenol a
impairs the uterine response to ovarian steroids in the adult.
Endocrinology. 149:5848–5860. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18
|
Hiyama M, Choi EK, Wakitani S, et al:
Bisphenol-A (BPA) affects reproductive formation across generations
in mice. J Vet Med Sci. 73:1211–1215. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
19
|
Ruan HC, Zhu XM, Luo Q, et al: Ovarian
stimulation with GnRH agonist, but not GnRH antagonist, partially
restores the expression of endometrial integrin beta3 and
leukaemia-inhibitory factor and improves uterine receptivity in
mice. Hum Reprod. 21:2521–2529. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
20
|
Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, et
al: Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian
stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized
trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Fertil
Steril. 96:344–348. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
21
|
Yamagata Y, Asada H, Tamura I, et al: DNA
methyltransferase expression in the human endometrium:
down-regulation by progesterone and estrogen. Hum Reprod.
24:1126–1132. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
22
|
Munro SK, Farquhar CM, Mitchell MD and
Ponnampalam AP: Epigenetic regulation of endometrium during the
menstrual cycle. Mol Hum Reprod. 16:297–310. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
23
|
Vincent ZL, Farquhar CM, Mitchell MD and
Ponnampalam AP: Expression and regulation of DNA methyltransferases
in human endometrium. Fertil Steril. 95:1522–1525. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
24
|
Logan PC, Ponnampalam AP, Rahnama F, et
al: The effect of DNA methylation inhibitor 5-Aza-2′-deoxycytidine
on human endometrial stromal cells. Hum Reprod. 25:2859–2869.
2010.
|
|
25
|
van Montfoort AP, Hanssen LL, de Sutter P,
et al: Assisted reproduction treatment and epigenetic inheritance.
Hum Reprod Update. 18:171–197. 2012.
|
|
26
|
Horsthemke B and Ludwig M: Assisted
reproduction: the epigenetic perspective. Hum Reprod Update.
11:473–482. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
27
|
Tarlatzis BC and Bili HN:
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists: im-pact of IVF practice
and potential nonassisted reproductive technologyapplications. Curr
Opin Obstet Gynecol. 15:259–264. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
28
|
Ludwig M, Katalinic A and Diedrich K: Use
of GnRH antagonists in ovarian stimulation for assisted
reproductive technologies compared to the long protocol.
Meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 265:175–182. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
29
|
Olivennes F, Cunha-Filho JS, Fanchin R, et
al: The use of GnRH antagonists in ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod
Update. 8:279–290. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
30
|
Grimaldi G, Christian M, Quenby S and
Brosens JJ: Expression of epigenetic effectors in decidualizing
human endometrial stromal cells. Mol Hum Reprod. 18:451–458. 2012.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
31
|
Quinn CE and Casper RF: Pinopodes: a
questionable role in endometrial receptivity. Hum Reprod Update.
15:229–236. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
32
|
Creus M, Ordi J, Fábregues F, et al: αvβ3
integrin expression and pinopod formation in normal and
out-of-phase endometria of fertile and infertile women. Hum Reprod.
17:2279–2286. 2002.
|
|
33
|
Creus M, Ordi J, Fábregues F, et al: The
effect of different hormone therapies on integrin expression and
pinopode formation in the human endometrium: a controlled study.
Hum Reprod. 18:683–693. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
