Open Access

Comparison of the proliferation, cytotoxic activity and cytokine secretion function of cascade primed immune cells and cytokine‑induced killer cells in vitro

  • Authors:
    • Gui‑Xin Li
    • Shu‑Shu Zhao
    • Xu‑Guang Zhang
    • Wen‑Hao Wang
    • Jin Liu
    • Ke‑Wei Xue
    • Xiao‑Yan Li
    • Ying‑Xue Guo
    • Li‑Hua Wang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: May 8, 2015     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.3765
  • Pages: 2629-2635
  • Copyright: © Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY_NC 3.0].

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The present study aimed to compare the antitumor effects of cascade primed immune (CAPRI) cells and cytokine‑induced killer (CIK) cells in vitro, through investigating cell morphology, proliferation, cytotoxic activity to tumor cells and the ability of these cells to secrete cytokines. Peripheral blood samples (50 ml) were obtained from three healthy volunteers and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were obtained from each via Ficoll‑Conray density gradient centrifugation. Each suspension of PBMCs (1x106/ml) was divided into two parts; CAPRI cells were obtained from one part through a series of induction, amplification and cytokine cultures, while CIK cells were obtained from the other part through induction with different cytokines. During the culture process, the proliferation and morphological changes were observed for the two cell types using Trypan blue staining. At day 14, the cytotoxic activity of the two cell types was examined through determining lactate dehydrogenase release in the presence of K562 leukemia cells and MCF‑7 breast cancer cells. In addition, secretory levels of interferon (IFN)‑γ and interleukin (IL)‑2 were detected using enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) technology. The results revealed that at day 5 and 14 of culture, there were significantly fewer CAPRI cells compared with CIK cells (P<0.001), although the survival rate of each cell type was >95%. The cytotoxic activity of CAPRI cells towards the K562 cell line was effector‑target ratio‑dependent (40:1 and 20:1) with values of 55.1±3.25 and 35.0±2.65%, respectively, which were significantly reduced compared with the corresponding data in CIK cells, 60.0±3.03 and 39.7±3.42% (P=0.004 and 0.005, respectively). Furthermore, the cytotoxic activity of CAPRI cells towards MCF‑7 cells were 71.5±3.06, 56.0±3.76 and 40.2±2.90% at effector‑target ratios 40:1, 20:1 and 10:1, respectively. These data were significantly higher than the corresponding values in CIK cells, 65.4±3.86, 49.5±3.91 and 36.1±3.73% (P=0.002, 0.003 and 0.02, respectively). As determined using ELISPOT technology at different cell concentrations (1x106/ml and 5x105/ml), IFN‑γ secretion levels, determined by the number of spot‑forming cells, of CAPRI cells were 126.2±10.31 and 48.8±10.99, respectively, which were significantly reduced compared with those of CIK cells, 409.3±7.76 and 159.3±15.45, respectively (P<0.001). IL‑2 secretion levels in CAPRI cells were 325.1±16.24 and 113.8±11.29 at 1x106/ml and 5x105/ml, respectively, which were significantly increased compared with CIK cells, 212.0±16.58 and 70.7±10.57, respectively (P<0.001). In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that CAPRI cells had a reduced proliferation rate compared with CIK cells as well as a less potent cytotoxic effect on K562 cells; however, the two cell types had potent cytotoxic activity towards solid tumor MCF‑7 cells. In addition, CAPRI cells secreted lower levels of IFN‑γ and increased levels of IL‑2 compared with CIK cells. These results indicated that antitumor activities of CAPRI and CIK cells proceeded via different mechanisms.

Introduction

Cancer is a prominent public health problem worldwide, which has increasing incidence and mortality rates (1). Progress has been made in improving cancer therapy, with surgical resection, chemotherapy and radiotherapy being the three major conventional modes of cancer treatment (2). However, effective treatment remains to be achieved for numerous types of tumors (2). Biological treatment is a novel model in comprehensive cancer treatment, which has received extensive attention (3,4). Adoptive cellular immunotherapy (ACI) is an important form of biological tumor therapy, which involves the infusion of autologous or allogeneic immune cells in order to enhance immune function in patients and in turn achieve antitumor effects (5).

Cascade primed immune (CAPRI) cells and cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells have been used as novel adoptive immunotherapy cells and are known to have different strengths and biological characteristics (6). These cells have been widely used in previous clinical studies; however, there have been no systematic comparative evaluations of the two treatments (7,8). Therefore, the present study aimed to compare the antitumor effects of CAPRI and CIK cells in vitro, through investigating cell morphology, proliferation, cytotoxic activity to tumor cells and the ability of these cells to secrete cytokines. These methods of comparison may be extended for the future detection of a variety of cell lines and cytokines in order to better guide clinical treatment.

Materials and methods

Materials and reagents

K562 human leukemia cells and MCF-7 human breast cancer cells were purchased from the cell library of Cancer Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences Academy (Beijing, China). K562 and MCF-7 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Beijing Suolaibao Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; HyClone Laboratories, Inc., Logan, UT, USA) at 37°C in 5% CO2. Low molecular weight heparin injections were purchased from Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd (Jinan, China). The substrate mix (BCIP/NBT Color Development Substrate) was purchased from Promega Corp. (Madison, WI, USA). 96-well plates and cell culture flasks were obtained from Beijing Aibo Biological Engineering Co., Ltd. Recombinant human (rHu) interferon (INF)-γ and rHu interleukin (IL)-2 were purchased from Peprotech Co. (Rocky Hill, NJ, USA). Mouse monoclonal anti-human CD3 antibodies were provided by Beijing Tonglihaiyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). CAPRI cell culture patented reagents were obtained from the Institute of Immunology, University of Munich (Munich, Germany). Lymphocyte stratified fluid was purchased from Tianjin Haoyang Biological Products Co., Ltd (Tianjin, China). IFN-γ and IL-2 ELISPOT kits were purchased from Shenzhen Dakewei Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Guangdong, China).

Instruments

Clean benches, portable autoclaves and the constant temperature water bath were purchased from Shanghai Boxun Industry and Commerce Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The CO2 incubator was obtained from Sanyo Electric International Trading Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) and the micropipettes were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The low-speed centrifuge (B40) was obtained from Hebei Anxin Baiyang Centrifugal Machinery Factory (Hebei, China) and enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT; S5) analyzers were provided by Cellular Technology, Ltd (Shaker Heights, OH, USA). The inverted microscope (BDS200) was obtained from Chongqing Auto Optical Instruments Co., Ltd. (Chongqing, China) and the ELISA analyzer (RT2100c) was obtained from Rayto Life and Analytical Science Co. (Shenzhen, China).

Culture of CAPRI cells and CIK cells

The current study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University (Weifang, China) and written informed consent was obtained from the patient/the patient’s families. A total of 50 ml blood was extracted from three healthy volunteers and heparin (1 ml; 6250 U/ml) was added to prevent coagulation. The three specimens were then stratified with lymphocyte fluid. Ficoll-Conray density gradient centrifugation (50–60 ml peripheral blood, density 1.077±0.001 g/ml) was performed to obtain three separate suspensions of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Following washing with 0.9% NaCl, RPMI 1640 medium was used to adjust the PBMC suspension to 1×106cells/ml. Samples were labeled (a, b and c) and the PBMC suspensions from each source were divided into two parts as follows: a1, b1 and c1 for CAPRI cell induction; and a2, b2 and c2 for CIK cell induction.

CAPRI cells induction

A total of 12 ml coating solution (Shanghai Weike Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) was added to three flasks, which were then incubated at 4°C for 24 h. The coating solution was removed and 20 ml saline (Shandong Qidu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Shandong, China) was added to each flask, which were then mixed uniformly and left to stand for 2 min prior to saline removal. A total of 18 ml complete medium (RPMI 1640 and 10% FBS) was added to each flask. PBMC suspensions (12 ml; 1×106 cells/ml) of a1, b1 and c1 were added to the flasks and incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator for 3 h. CAPRI patent reagent A (0.4 ml) was added to each culture flask for 3 h at 25°C and the stimulated culture substances were subsequently obtained.

Lymphocyte stratified fluid (12 ml) was added to each stimulated culture medium and then cultured at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator for 16 h. The culture substances were collected in 50 ml centrifuge tubes and centrifuged at 750 × g for 8 min. The supernatants were discarded and RPMI 1640 was used to resuspend cells. Cells were then counted using a cell counting plate under the inverted microscope and were subjected to further centrifugation (800 × g for 12 min).

Complete medium was used to resuspend the cells and CAPRI patent reagent B (0.4 ml) was added to each cell suspension, which were then dispensed into flasks and cultured at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator for 72 h. CAPRI cells were then collected and used for subsequent experiments. One part were further cultured (3×106 cells/ml; −80°C) to study the cells proliferative capacity, the other groups (3×106 cells/ml) were frozen (−80°C) till 14 days and the cytotoxic activity and cytokine secretion levels of them were used to perform a comparative study with CIK cells.

CIK cells induction

The three PBMC suspensions (a2, b2 and c2; 12 ml) were transferred into sterile culture flasks and 18 ml complete medium containing 10% FBS was then added. Samples were then incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator for 2 h of static culture. IFN-γ (1,000 U/ml) was added and continuously cultured for 24 h, 37°C, 5% CO2. IL-2 cytokines (300 U/ml) were then added with 50 ng/ml CD3 monoclonal antibody. Cells passaged every 3 days and a further 300 U/ml IL-2 was added with each passage. Samples were cultured at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator for 14 days to collect CIK cells. These cells were subsequently used for determining proliferation, cytotoxic activity and cytokine secretion.

Proliferation assay of CAPRI cells and CIK cells

An inverted microscope was used to dynamically observe the proliferation of three PBMC suspensions (a, b and c), which were induced using the methods described above. On days 1, 3, 5 and 14 of culture, cells were stained using Trypan blue (Yocon Bio-Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) and counted in order to determine proliferation and morphology. Experiments were performed in triplicate.

Cytotoxic activity detection of effector cells using a lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release assay
Cell culture groups

CIK cells cultured for 14 days (a, b and c) and the thawed CAPRI cells (a, b and c) were the effector cells. K562 leukemia cells and MCF-7 breast cancer cells were used as the target cells. All experiments were performed in triplicate and plating of the treatment groups is shown in Fig. 1. The following procedure was performed separately for each of the two target cell lines.

Three different effector-target ratios of 40:1, 20:1, 10:1 were used; effector cells (100 µl) concentrations of 4×106, 2×106 and 1×106/ml were added to each well with 100 µl target cells at a concentration of 1×105/ml. CIK cells, B1-B9; and CAPRI cells, C7-C12 and D1-D3.

Effector cells (100 µl/well) were plated at concentrations of 4×106, 2×106 and 1×106/ml for each group (a, b and c) with 100 µl culture medium in order to detect spontaneous cytotoxic activity. CIK cells, B10–B12 and C1–C6; and CAPRI cells, D3–D12.

In order to determine maximum cytotoxic activity, target cells (100 µl/well) were plated at a concentration of 1×105/ml into three wells (A1–A3) with 100 µl culture medium. These cells were incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 culture incubator, at 45 min prior to the end of incubation, 20 µl/well cell lysate was added. In addition, to determine the spontaneous cytotoxicity of target cells, 1×105/ml target cells (100 µl/well) were plated into three wells (A4–A6) with 100 µl culture medium.

Blank control wells (A7–A9) consisted of 200 µl/well culture medium; in addition, the corrected volume control wells consisted of 200 µl/well culture medium (A10–A12), which were then incubated 20 µl/well cell lysate, which was added at 45 min prior to the end of culture at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator.

Culture and supernatant collection

Following centrifugation at 250 × g for 4 min, cells were cultured at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator for 4–6 h. At 45 min prior to the end of culture, the culture plates were removed and 20 µl cell lysate was added to wells in the target cells maximum cytotoxicity group and the corrected volume control group. Cells in these two groups were then centrifuged at 250 × g for 4 min and further cultured for 45 min.

LDH measurement

Each group was centrifuged at 250 × g for 4 min and 50 µl supernatant per well was transferred into a separate 96-well plate with 50 µl/well substrate mix and incubated for 30 min at room temperature in the dark. Stop solution (50 µl/well; Yanhui Bio-Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) was then added and pigmented particles were broken up using an oscillator (G560E; Scientific Industries, New York, NY, USA). Absorbance was measured at 490 nm using an ELISA analyzer.

Results and calculation

Mean absorbance values were calculated for each group. In order to obtain the corrected values for A (test), T (target cells spontaneous release) and E (effector cells spontaneous release), the mean absorbance value for the blank control group was subtracted from the mean absorbance values for the test, target cells spontaneous release and effector cells spontaneous release groups. The mean absorbance values in target cell maximum release group minus the mean absorbance values in corrected volume group, and the corrected Tmax was obtained. Cytotoxic activity (%)=(A−E−T)/(Tmax−T)×100%.

ELISPOT detection of IFN-γ and IL-2 secretion

CAPRI cells (a1, b1 and c1) and CIK cells (a2, b2 and c2) were transferred and the stimulating substance was added, under aseptic conditions.

ELISPOT plates were precoated with 200 µl/well RPMI 1640 medium and incubated at room temperature for 10 min. CAPRI or CIK cells at concentrations of 1×106/ml and 5×105/ml were then plated (100 µl/well). The positive and negative control groups for each cell type were plated as follows: Negative control, 1×106 and 5×105 cells/ml with 10 µl/well RPMI 1640 medium with 10% FBS; positive control, 1×106 and 5×105 cells/ml with phytohemagglutinin cell stimulator working fluid. The well plate was then covered and incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator for 20 h. Following incubation, the cells and medium were removed and added to ice-cold deionized water (200 µl/well). Hypotonic cell lysis was performed with Hypotonic Lysis Buffer (Amresco LLC, Solon, OH, USA) at 4°C for 10 min. Cells were then washed five times for 60 sec each with 1X washing buffer (200 µl/well; Shenzhen Dakewei Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) and then dried on absorbent paper.

A biotin-labeled diluted antibody solution (100 µl; in ELISPOT kit) was added to each experimental well and incubated at 37°C for 1 h. Cells were then washed, as above, and dried on absorbent paper. Horseradish peroxidase-avidin diluted antibody working solution (100 µl) was added to each experimental well and incubated at 37°C for 1 h. Cells were then washed, as above, and dried on absorbent paper.

Each experimental well was stained with 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole working solution (100 µl/well; Shenzhen Dakewei Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) and incubated at room temperature in the dark for 25 min. In order to terminate staining, liquid was poured out in each well, the base plate was opened and deionized water (Xinyu, Shanghai, China) was used to wash the wells five times. The plates were then placed at room temperature in the dark, with the base closed, until they dried.

Spot count was then performed in the ELISPOT plates and various parameters of spots were recorded in order to determine IFN-γ and IL-2 secretion levels. Brown spots indicated that the cells had produced cytokines.

Statistical analysis

SPSS 17.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data analysis. Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Independent samples t-tests were used for comparisons between two groups. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference between values.

Results

Morphology and cell proliferation activity of CAPRI cells and CIK cells

Cultured CAPRI cells began to proliferate within 2 days and entered the proliferation stage within 3 days. Following 14 days, cultured cells reached a density of (6.32±1.23)×107. Cultured CIK cells began to proliferate within 3 days and entered the proliferation stage within 5 days. Following 14 days, cultured cells reached a density of (60.21±6.08)×107. Following 3 days of culture, the proliferation rate of CIK cells was significantly faster compared with CAPRI cells; of note, at day 5, the proliferation rate of CIK cells was ~3 times that of CAPRI cells (P<0.001); at day 14, CIK cells had proliferated ~60 times compared with day 1, which was ~10 times that of CAPRI cells at day 14 (P<0.001) (Table I).

Table I

Proliferation comparison of CAPRI cells and CIK cells.

Table I

Proliferation comparison of CAPRI cells and CIK cells.

Day of cultureCAPRI cells (×107)CIK cells (×107)t-valueP-value
11.21±0.211.16±0.200.4470.661
32.33±0.563.19±1.142.0330.059
53.61±1.16a10.39±4.244.629<0.001
146.32±1.23a60.21±6.0826.057<0.001

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn1-mmr-12-02-2629'] } Values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (n=9).

a P<0.05 vs. CIK cells. CAPRI cells, cascade primed immune cells; CIK, cytokine-induced killer cells.

Cells were harvested and examined under an inverted microscope, which revealed that cells grew as colonies in suspension (Figs. 2 and 3). Cell volume was markedly increased over time and the survival rate of cultured cells was >95%. Of note, CAPRI cell patent reagents instructions described that the cultured cells should be harvested for clinical treatment on day 5 (6); however, since the present study was a comparative to CIK cells, the experimental culture was performed for 14 days.

Cytotoxic activity of CAPRI and CIK cells against K562 leukemia and MCF-7 breast cancer cells

The results of the cytotoxic activity of CAPRI and CIK cells against K562 cells are shown in Table II. These results demonstrated that the two cell types exhibited cytotoxicity on K562 cells. The cytotoxic activity of CAPRI cells were 55.1±3.25 and 35.0±2.65% at effector-target ratios of 40:1 and 20:1, respectively, which were significantly reduced compared with the corresponding values of the CIK cells, 60.0±3.03 and 39.7±3.42% (P=0.004 and 0.005, respectively). No significant difference was observed in cytotoxic activity at an effector-target ratio of 10:1 between the two groups (P=0.056).

Table II

Cytotoxic activity of CAPRI cells and CIK cells against K562 leukemia cells.

Table II

Cytotoxic activity of CAPRI cells and CIK cells against K562 leukemia cells.

Effector-target ratioCAPRI cells (%)CIK cells (%)t-valueP-value
40:155.1±3.25a60.0±3.033.3100.004
20:135.0±2.65a39.7±3.423.2650.005
10:128.5±2.3630.6±1.722.0620.056

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn3-mmr-12-02-2629'] } Values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (n=9).

a P<0.05 vs. CIK cells. CAPRI cells, cascade primed immune cells; CIK, cyto-kine-induced killer cells.

The results of the cytotoxic activity of CAPRI and CIK cells against MCF-7 cells are shown in Table III. These results revealed that the two cell types exerted cytotoxic effects on MCF-7 cells. Cytotoxic activity of CAPRI cells were 71.5±3.06, 56.0±3.76 and 40.2±2.90% at effector-target ratios of 40:1, 20:1 and 10:1, respectively, which were significantly increased compared with the corresponding values of CIK cells, 65.4±3.86, 49.5±3.91 and 36.1±3.73% (P=0.002, 0.003 and 0.02, respectively).

Table III

Cytotoxic activity of CAPRI cells and CIK cells against MCF-7 breast cancer cells.

Table III

Cytotoxic activity of CAPRI cells and CIK cells against MCF-7 breast cancer cells.

Effector-target ratioCAPRI cells (%)CIK cells (%)t-valueP-value
40:171.5±3.06a65.4±3.863.7290.002
20:156.0±3.76a49.5±3.913.5630.003
10:140.2±2.90a36.1±3.732.5820.020

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn5-mmr-12-02-2629'] } Values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (n=9).

a P<0.05 vs. CIK cells. CAPRI cells, cascade primed immune cells; CIK, cytokine-induced killer cells.

IFN-γ and IL-2 secretion levels of CAPRI and CIK cells

As shown in Fig. 4, each spot-forming cell (SFC) represented a measured cytokine secretion of CAPRI or CIK cells. ELISPOT analysis results are quantified in Tables IV and V. CAPRI and CIK cells each produced high levels of IFN-γ and IL-2 secretion. ELISPOT detection was performed at two different cell concentrations (1×106 and 5×105 cells/ml). In CAPRI cells, the number of IFN-γ SFCs detected were 126.2±10.31 and 48.8±10.99, respectively, which were significantly lower compared with the corresponding values in CIK cells, 409.3±7.76 and 159.3±15.45 (P<0.001) (Table IV). The number of IL-2 SFCs in CAPRI cells were 325.1±16.24 and 113.8±11.29 at concentrations of 1×106 and 5×105 cells/ml, respectively, which were increase compared with the corresponding values in CIK cells, 212.0±16.58 and 70.7±10.57 (P<0.001) (Table V).

Table IV

Number of IFN-γ spot-forming cells at different cell densities of CAPRI cells and CIK cells.

Table IV

Number of IFN-γ spot-forming cells at different cell densities of CAPRI cells and CIK cells.

Cell densityCAPRI cellsCIK cellst-valueP-value
1×106/ml126.2±10.31a409.3±7.7665.833<0.001
5×105/ml48.8±10.99a159.3±15.4517.494<0.001

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn7-mmr-12-02-2629'] } Values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (n=9).

a P<0.05 vs. CIK cells. CAPRI cells, cascade primed immune cells; CIK, cytokine-induced killer cells; IFN-γ, interferon-γ.

Table V

Number of IL-2 spot-forming cells at different cell densities of CAPRI cells and CIK cells.

Table V

Number of IL-2 spot-forming cells at different cell densities of CAPRI cells and CIK cells.

Cell densityCAPRI cellsCIK cellst-valueP-value
1×106/ml325.1±16.24a212.0±16.5814.621<0.001
5×105/ml113.8±11.29a70.7±10.578.362<0.001

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn9-mmr-12-02-2629'] } Values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (n=9).

a P<0.05 vs. CIK cells. CAPRI cells, cascade primed immune cells; CIK, cytokine-induced killer cells; IL-2, interleukin-2.

Discussion

Developments in the fields of molecular tumor biology, cell biology and immunology of cancer have resulted in a more comprehensive and in-depth understanding of tumors (9). Adoptive immunotherapy of cancer cells is a novel model of comprehensive treatment, which has an increasingly important role in cancer therapy (10). However, issues for the clinical use of this model require addressing, including differing effects of CAPRI and CIK cell therapies in different cell types, the balance between the use of adoptive immunotherapy and conventional treatments of surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy to achieve the highest combination efficacy as well as the method of activating the suppression status of the body’s immune system (11). CAPRI and CIK cell therapies are prominent adoptive cell immunotherapies, which are currently widely used in clinical practice (12).

CAPRI cells are chain autologous activated immune cells, the effector cells of which include natural killer (NK) cells, NK-like T cell lymphocytes (NKT cells), dendritic cells, CD4+ T helper (Th) cells and CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) (6). Th cells and CTLs accounted for 80% of the major cytotoxic activity of CAPRI cells and the remaining effector cells accounted for 20% (6). CIK cells simultaneously express two types of membrane protein molecules, CD3+ and CD56+, and are also known as NKT cells; these cells were reported to have the oncolytic advantage of T lymphocytes as well as the non-major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-restricted antitumor activity of NK cells (13). The potent antitumor activities of CIK cells primarily proceed via the following four mechanisms: Direct cytotoxic effects on tumor cells (14); induced proliferation of T cells to CTL (15); induced apoptosis of tumor cells (16); and production of cytokines with oncolytic effects (17).

The antitumor mechanisms of CIK cells have been established; however, CAPRI cells are a novel method of treatment, for which the antitumor mechanisms are relatively undetermined (18). It was speculated that CAPRI cells were T lymphocytes, with comparable tumor cell-killing mechanisms to CIK cells. In the present study, a classic experiment was performed in order to compare the cytotoxic activity of CAPRI and CIK cells against K562 leukemia cells and MCF-7 breast cancer solid tumor cells. Previous studies have demonstrated that IFN-γ and IL-2 may be used alone in clinical treatment and as an inducer of cell therapy (19,20). Therefore, in the present study, the applications of these two cytokines were selected for ELISPOT technique detection in order to determine the indirect antitumor effect of CIK and CAPRI cells.

CAPRI cells were reported to require synergy of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-I and HLA-II expression for successful tumor cell lyses (21). This demonstrated the complete interdependence of Th cells and CTLs. Generation of CTLs was demonstrated to be dependent on the interactions between α-β T cell receptors, peptide-MHCs and antigen-presenting cell surface molecules of HLA-II tumor immunogenic peptides (22). However, the complete dissolve of tumor cells may be dependent on the interaction of HLA-I- and HLA-II-type antigens (22). CAPRI cells were reported to enhance HLA-I and HLA-II expression on the surface of solid tumors; however, K562 cells were not induced to express leukocyte antigen and K562 cell lysis was primarily mediated by activated NKT cells in PBMC culture (23,24). The results of the present study demonstrated that CAPRI cells exerted potent and specific cytotoxic effects on breast cancer cells of solid tumors, whereas CIK cells had strong non-specific cytotoxic activity. These results may have practical significance for the clinical use of these two cell types for adoptive immunotherapy.

In the present study, ELISPOT analysis revealed that IFN-γ secretion levels of CIK cells were higher than those of CAPRI cells, whereas IL-2 secretion levels of CAPRI cells were higher than those of CIK cells. However, the secretion levels for IFN-γ and IL-2 were relatively high in the two cell types. CAPRI and CIK cells have different types of effector cells; therefore, their antitumor mechanisms may also differ. IL-2 is primarily produced by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, which make up 80% of the CAPRI effector cells, while IFN-γ is predominantly produced by CD8+ T cells and NK cells, of which NK cells are the major effector cells of CIK cells (25). The cytotoxic mechanisms of the two cell types involve the tumor suppressing and cytotoxic effects of inhibitory cytokines, which are secreted by effector cells of CAPRI and CIK cells (26). The present study demonstrated that CAPRI and CIK exerted immunomodulatory effects via the secretion of IFN-γ and IL-2, which was an important aspect of the cytotoxic activity evaluation. The detection techniques used in the present study may be applied to clinical work, as patients may receive cytokines detection tests prior to and following adoptive cell immunotherapy in order to evaluate therapeutic effectiveness.

The key principle of tumor cell adoptive immunotherapy is to have sufficient quantities of immune cells with strong cytotoxic activity (27). These technical cycles are short (5 days) and have a high specificity; i addition, cells can be cryopreserved following harvesting, which provides convenience for clinical use.

The results of the current study demonstrated that the cell density of CAPRI and CIK cells was (6.32±1.23)×107 and (60.21±6.08)×107, respectively, following treatment for 14 days. The cell proliferative activity of CAPRI cells was significantly lower than that of CIK cells (P<0.001). Compared with the 1st day, the proliferative rate of CAPRI was 3 times higher at the 5th and 6 times higher at the 14th days, while CIK was 10 times higher at the 5th and 60 times higher at the 14th days.

In conclusion, the experimental results of the present study demonstrated that CAPRI cells have a weaker cytotoxic effect on NK target cells of K562 leukemia cells compared with their potent cytotoxic effect on the NK-insensitive solid tumors MCF-7 cells. These experimental methods may be used as a model to further explore the cytotoxic activity of tumor cells in other entities and to provide guidance for future clinical studies and treatment options. The cytotoxic activity of CIK cells is not MHC restricted, however CAPRI cells filter MHC of cells, which remedies the deficiency of CIK cells treatment. The ELISPOT technique may be used to detect the secretion of cytokines for these two cell types prior to and following treatment for clinical efficacy assessment. Since the culture time and antitumor mechanisms between CAPRI and CIK cells differed, this may offer the possibility for combination of the two cell types for antitumor therapy; however, further studies and clinical trials are required in order to confirm the effectiveness of this combined therapy.

Acknowledgments

The present study was supported by the construction funds from Oncology Medical Key Laboratory of Shandong Province.

References

1 

Dong Z, Qiao Y, Li L, et al: Report of Chinese cancer control strategy. Bull Chin Cancer. 11:250–260. 2002.

2 

Tang ZY: Modern Oncology. 2nd. Shanghai Medical University Press; Shanghai: pp. 513–516. 2000

3 

Han BH: Tumor Biological Immune Targeted Therapy. 1st. Shanghai Science and Technology Publishing House; Shanghai: pp. 47–52. 2006

4 

Hao: Solid Tumor Cellular Immunotherapy. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House; Beijing: pp. 3–4. 2010

5 

Sha W: Clinical Tumor Biological Immunotherapy. 1st. Tianjin Science and Technology Press; Tianjin: pp. 142–144. 2006

6 

Laumbacher B, Gu S and Wank R: Activated monocytes prime naïve T cells against autologous cancer: vigorous cancer destruction in vitro and in vivo. Scand J Immunol. 75:314–328. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Ren H, Xing S, Li D, et al: The proliferation profile in vitro and anti-tumor effects of CIK cells in vivo and in vitro. Chin J Cancer Biother. 6:17–21. 1999.

8 

Morse MA, Glay TM and Lyerly HK: Current status of adoptive immunotherapy of malignancies. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2:237–247. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Tai G: Tumor immunotherapy: Progresses and trends. Chin J Cancer Biother. 16:427–430. 2009.

10 

Anne C, Eaton Armstrong David, Ewing Joanne C, et al: Cellular immunotherapy for cancer. BMJ Chinese Edition. 3:331–335. 2003.

11 

Yang JJ, Xu XX and Qian G: Research progress on tumor biochemotherapy. Int J Respir. 30:1137–1141. 2010.

12 

Qian QJ and Wu MC: Adoptive cell therapy of cancer-An old story with a new twist. Chin J Cancer Biother. 18:1–6. 2011.

13 

Pan CC, Huang ZL, Li W, Zhao M, Zhou QM, Xia JC and Wu PH: Serum alpha-fetoprotein measurement in predicting clinical outcome related to autologous cytokine-induced killer cells in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergone minimally invasive therapy. Chin J Cancer. 29:596–602. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Li H, Yu JP, Cao S, Wei F, Zhang P, An XM, Huang ZT and Ren XB: CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells decreased the antitumor activity of cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells of lung cancer patients. J Clin Immunol. 27:317–326. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Mehta BA, Schmidt-Wolf IG, Weissman IL and Negrin RS: Two pathways of exocytosis of cytoplasmic granule contents and target cell killing by cytokine-induced CD3+ CD56+ killer cells. Blood. 86:3493–3499. 1995.PubMed/NCBI

16 

Ren H, Xing SX, Xu GW, et al: In vitro proliferation of CIK and kill tumor in vivo and in vitro activity of experimental study. Chinese journal of tumor biological treatment. 6:17–21. 1999.

17 

Linn YC, Wang SM and Hui KM: Comparative gene expression profiling of cytokine-induced killer cells in response to acute myloid leukemic and acute lymphoblastic leukemic stimulators using oligonucleotide arrays. Exp Hematol. 33:671–681. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Sui CG, Meng F, Wang XH, et al: Preparation and cytotokic effects of cytokine-induced killer cells on different tumor cell lines in vitro. J Chin Med Univ. 34:210–211. 2005.

19 

Shirai A, Homes K and Klinman D: Detection and quantitation of cells secreting IL-6 under physiologic conditions in BALB/c mice. J Immunol. 150:793–799. 1993.PubMed/NCBI

20 

Yang J, Lemas VM, Flinn IW, Krone C and Ambinder RF: Application of the ELISPOT assay to the characterization of CD8(+) responses to Epstein-Barr virus antigens. Blood. 95:241–248. 2000.

21 

Garrido F and Ruiz-Cabello F: MHC expression on human tumors - its relevance for local tumor growth and metastasis. Semin Cancer Biol. 2:3–10. 1991.PubMed/NCBI

22 

van der Merwe PA and Davis SJ: Molecular interactions mediating T cell antigen recognition. Annu Rev Immunol. 21:659–684. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Verneris MR, Kornacker M, Mailänder V and Negrin RS: Resistance of ex vivo expanded CD3+CD56+ T cells to Fas-mediated apoptosis. Cancer Immunol Immunothr. 49:335–345. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Schmidt-Wolf IG, Finke S, Trojaneck B, et al: Phase I clinical study applying autologous immunological effector cells transfected with the interleukin-2 gene in patients with metastatic renal cancer, colorectal cancer and lymphoma. Br J Cancer. 81:1009–1016. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Jiang HN, Qi YC and Wang YD: Character and advancement of cytokine-induced kill cells. Tum J World. 4:240–242. 2005.

26 

Lei J, Qian M, Wu ZL, Zhang SQ and Yan YC: Study on cytokine expression profiles of CIK cells in vitro. Chin J Immunol. 21:589–593. 2005.

27 

Laport GG, Sheehan K, Baker J, et al: Adoptive immunotherapy with cytokine-induced killer cells for patients with relapsed hematologic malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 17:1679–1687. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

August-2015
Volume 12 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Li GX, Zhao SS, Zhang XG, Wang WH, Liu J, Xue KW, Li XY, Guo YX and Wang LH: Comparison of the proliferation, cytotoxic activity and cytokine secretion function of cascade primed immune cells and cytokine‑induced killer cells in vitro. Mol Med Rep 12: 2629-2635, 2015
APA
Li, G., Zhao, S., Zhang, X., Wang, W., Liu, J., Xue, K. ... Wang, L. (2015). Comparison of the proliferation, cytotoxic activity and cytokine secretion function of cascade primed immune cells and cytokine‑induced killer cells in vitro. Molecular Medicine Reports, 12, 2629-2635. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.3765
MLA
Li, G., Zhao, S., Zhang, X., Wang, W., Liu, J., Xue, K., Li, X., Guo, Y., Wang, L."Comparison of the proliferation, cytotoxic activity and cytokine secretion function of cascade primed immune cells and cytokine‑induced killer cells in vitro". Molecular Medicine Reports 12.2 (2015): 2629-2635.
Chicago
Li, G., Zhao, S., Zhang, X., Wang, W., Liu, J., Xue, K., Li, X., Guo, Y., Wang, L."Comparison of the proliferation, cytotoxic activity and cytokine secretion function of cascade primed immune cells and cytokine‑induced killer cells in vitro". Molecular Medicine Reports 12, no. 2 (2015): 2629-2635. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.3765