|
1
|
Langer R and Vacanti JP: Tissue
engineering. Science. 260:920–926. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
2
|
Temple HT and Malinin TI: Microparticulate
cortical allograft: An alternative to autograft in the treatment of
osseous defects. Open Orthop J. 2:91–96. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3
|
Zhang HY, Zhang SH, Luo JB, Liu YH, Qian
SH, Liang FH and Huang YL: Investigation of protein adsorption
mechanism and biotribological properties at simulated stem-cement
interface. J Tribology Transactions of ASME. 135:0323012013.
View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
4
|
Zanasi S: Innovations in total knee
replacement: New trends in operative treatment and changes in
peri-operative management. Eur Orthop Traumatol. 2:21–31. 2011.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
Zhang HY, Luo JB, Zhou M, Zhang Y and
Huang YL: Biotribological properties at the stem-cement interface
lubricated with different media. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater.
20:209–216. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
6
|
Miller MA, Ivkovic A, Porter R, Harris MB,
Estok DM II, Smith RM, Evans CH and Vrahas MS: Autologous bone
grafting on steroids: Preliminary clinical results. A novel
treatment for nonunions and segmental bone defects. Int Orthop.
35:599–605. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar :
|
|
7
|
Carne GM, Ishaug SL and Mikos AG: Bone
tissue engineering. Nat Med. 1:1322–1324. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
8
|
Baroli B: From natural bone grafts to
tissue engineering therapeutics: Brainstorming on pharmaceutical
formulative requirements and challenges. J Pharm Sci. 98:1317–1375.
2009. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
9
|
Kamath MS, Ahmed SS, Dhanasekaran M and
Santosh SW: Polycaprolactone scaffold engineered for sustained
release of resveratrol: Therapeutic enhancement in bone tissue
engineering. Int J Nanomedicine. 9:183–195. 2014.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
10
|
Shahini A, Yazdimamaghani M, Walker KJ,
Eastman MA, Hatami-Marbini H, Smith BJ, Ricci JL, Madihally SV,
Vashaee D and Tayebi L: 3D conductive nanocomposite scaffold for
bone tissue engineering. Int J Nanomedicine. 9:167–181.
2014.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
11
|
Saravanan S, Sameera DK, Moorthi A and
Selvamurugan N: Chitosan scaffolds containing chicken feather
keratin nanoparticles for bone tissue engineering. Int J Biol
Macromol. 62:481–486. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
12
|
Dessì M, Borzacchiello A, Mohamed TH,
Abdel-Fattah WI and Ambrosio L: Novel biomimetic thermosensitive
β-tricalcium phosphate/chitosan-based hydrogels for bone tissue
engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A. 101:2984–2993. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
13
|
Shuai C, Gao C, Feng P, Peng S and Wen X:
Grain growth associates mechanical properties in
nano-hydroxyapatite bone scaffolds. J Nanosci Nanotechnol.
13:5340–5345. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
14
|
Xia Y, Zhou P, Cheng X, Xie Y, Liang C, Li
C and Xu S: Selective laser sintering fabrication of
nano-hydroxy-apatite/poly-ε-caprolactone scaffolds for bone tissue
engineering applications. Int J Nanomedicine. 8:4197–4213.
2013.
|
|
15
|
Yamaguchi I, Tokuchi K, Fukuzaki H, Koyama
Y, Takakuda K, Monma H and Tanaka J: Preparation and microstructure
analysis of chitosan/hydroxyapatite nanocomposites. J Biomed Mater
Res. 55:20–27. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
16
|
Zhang Y, Venugopal JR, El-Turki A,
Ramakrishna S, Su B and Lim CT: Electrospun biomimetic
nanocomposite nano-fibers of hydroxyapatite/chitosan for bone
tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 29:4314–4322. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
17
|
Duan K and Wang RZ: Surface modifications
of bone implants through wet chemistry. J Mater Chem. 16:2309–2321.
2006. View
Article : Google Scholar
|
|
18
|
Wang F, Zhang YC, Zhou H, Guo YC and Su
XX: Evaluation of in vitro and in vivo osteogenic differentiation
of nano-hydroxy-apatite/chitosan/poly (lactide-co-glycolide)
scaffolds with human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells. J
Biomed Mater Res A. 102:760–768. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
19
|
Zhang HY, Han JM, Sun YL, Huang YL and
Zhou M: MC3T3-E1 cell response to stainless steel 316L with
different surface treatments. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl.
56:22–29. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
20
|
El-Ghannam AR, Ducheyne P, Risbud M, Adams
CS, Shapiro IM, Castner D, Golledge S and Composto RJ: Model
surfaces engineered with nanoscale roughness and RGD tripeptides
promote osteoblast activity. J Biomed Mater Res A. 68:615–627.
2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
21
|
Secchi AG, Grigoriou V, Shapiro IM,
Cavalcanti-Adam EA, Composto RJ, Ducheyne P and Adams CS: RGDS
peptides immobilized on titanium alloy stimulate bone cell
attachment, differentiation and confer resistance to apoptosis. J
Biomed Mater Res A. 83:577–584. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
22
|
Yang F, Williams CG, Wang DA, Lee H,
Manson PN and Elisseeff J: The effect of incorporating RGD adhesive
peptide in polyethylene glycol diacrylate hydrogel on osteogenesis
of bone marrow stromal cells. Biomaterials. 26:5991–5998. 2005.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
23
|
Sawyer AA, Hennessy KM and Bellis SL:
Regulation of mesenchymal stem cell attachment and spreading on
hydroxyapatite by RGD peptides and adsorbed serum proteins.
Biomaterials. 26:1467–1475. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
24
|
Clark JD, Gebhart GF, Gonder JC, Keeling
ME and Kohn DF: The 1996 Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory
Animals. ILAR J. 38:41–48. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
25
|
Tamada Y and Ikada Y: Fibroblast growth on
polymer surfaces and biosynthesis of collagen. J Biomed Mater Res.
28:783–789. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
26
|
Zhang H, Blunt L, Jiang X, Brown L and
Barrans S: The significance of the micropores at the stem-cement
interface in total hip replacement. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed.
22:845–856. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
27
|
Amini AR, Laurencin CT and Nukavarapu SP:
Bone tissue engineering: Recent advances and challenges. Crit Rev
Biomed Eng. 40:363–408. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
28
|
Zhang HY, Blunt LA, Jiang XQ, Brown LT and
Barrans SM: The influence of bone cement type on production of
fretting wear on the femoral stem surface: A preliminary study.
Clin Biomech (Bristol Avon). 27:666–672. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
29
|
Roohani SI, Tavangarian F and Emadi R:
Nanostructured bioactive glass coating on porous hydroxyapatite
scaffold for strength enhancement. Mater Lett. 62:3428–3430. 2008.
View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
30
|
Qu Z, Yan J, Li B, Zhuang J and Huang Y:
Improving bone marrow stromal cell attachment on
chitosan/hydroxyapatite scaffolds by an immobilized RGD peptide.
Biomed Mater. 5:0650012010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
31
|
Ho MH, Wang DM, Hsieh HJ, Liu HC, Hsien
TY, Lai JY and Hou LT: Preparation and characterization of
RGD-immobilized chitosan scaffolds. Biomaterials. 26:3197–3206.
2005. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
32
|
Hofmann S, Hagenmuller H, Koch AM, Müller
R, Vunjak-Novakovic G, Kaplan DL, Merkle HP and Meinel L: Control
of in vitro tissue-engineered bone-like structures using human
mesenchymal stem cells and porous silk scaffolds. Biomaterials.
28:1152–1162. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
33
|
Hutmacher DW: Scaffolds in tissue
engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials. 21:2529–2543. 2000.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
34
|
Mistry AS, Pham QP, Schouten C, Yeh T,
Christenson EM, Mikos AG and Jansen JA: In vivo bone
biocompatibility and degradation of porous fumarate-based
polymer/alumoxane nanocomposites for bone tissue engineering. J
Biomed Mater Res A. 92:451–462. 2010.
|
|
35
|
El-Ghannam AR, Ducheyne P, Risbud M, Adams
CS, Shapiro IM, Castner D, Golledge S and Composto RJ: Model
surfaces engineered with nanoscale roughness and RGD tripeptides
promote osteoblast activity. J Biomed Mater Res A. 68:615–627.
2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
36
|
LeBaron RG and Athanasiou KA:
Extracellular matrix cell adhesion peptides: Functional
applications in orthopedic materials. Tissue Eng. 6:85–103. 2000.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
37
|
Kantlehner M, Finsinger D, Meyer J,
Schaffner P, Jonczyk A, Diefenbach B, Nies B and Kessler H:
Selective RGD-mediated adhesion of osteoblasts at surfaces of
implants. Angew Chem Int Ed. 38:560–562. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
38
|
Haubner R, Bruchertseifer F, Bock M,
Kessler H, Schwaiger M and Wester HJ: Synthesis and biological
evaluation of a (99m) Tc-labelled cyclic RGD peptide for imaging
the alphavbeta3 expression. Nuklearmedizin. 43:26–32.
2004.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
39
|
Oliveira JM, Rodrigues MT, Silva SS,
Malafaya PB, Gomes ME, Viegas CA, Dias IR, Azevedo JT, Mano JF and
Reis RL: Novel hydroxyapatite/chitosan bilayered scaffold for
osteochondral tissue-engineering applications: Scaffold design and
its performance when seeded with goat bone marrow stromal cells.
Biomaterials. 27:6123–6137. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
