1
|
Steigrad SJ: Epidemiology of gestational
trophoblastic diseases. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol.
17:837–847. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
2
|
Benirschke K and Kaufmann P: Molar
Pregnancies In Pathology of the Human Placenta. Springer; New York:
pp. 653–685. 1995, View Article : Google Scholar
|
3
|
Benirschke K and Masliah E: The placenta
in multiple pregnancy: Outstanding issues. Reprod Fertil Dev.
13:615–622. 2001. View
Article : Google Scholar
|
4
|
Seckl MJ, Sebire NJ and Berkowitz RS:
Gestational trophoblastic disease. Lancet. 376:717–729. 2010.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
5
|
Seckl MJ, Fisher RA, Salerno G, Rees H,
Paradinas FJ, Foskett M and Newlands ES: Choriocarcinoma and
partial hydatidiform moles. Lancet. 356:36–39. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
6
|
Sebire NJ and Rees H: Diagnosis of
gestational trophoblastic disease in early pregnancy. Current
Diagnostic Pathology. 8:430–440. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar
|
7
|
Sebire NJ, Fisher RA and Rees HC:
Histopathological diagnosis of partial and complete hydatidiform
mole in the first trimester of pregnancy. Pediatr Dev Pathol.
6:69–77. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar
|
8
|
Szulman AE and Surti U: The syndromes of
hydatidiform mole. II. Morphologic evolution of the complete and
partial mole. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 132:20–27. 1978. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
9
|
Vassilakos P, Riotton G and Kajii T:
Hydatidiform mole: Two entities. A morphologic and cytogenetic
study with some clinical consideration. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
127:167–170. 1977.PubMed/NCBI
|
10
|
Kirk E, Papageorghiou AT, Condous G,
Bottomley C and Bourne T: The accuracy of first trimester
ultrasound in the diagnosis of hydatidiform mole. Ultrasound Obstet
Gynecol. 29:70–75. 2007. View
Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
11
|
Zhang YX, Zhang YP, Gu Y, Guan FJ, Li SL,
Xie JS, Shen Y, Wu BL, Ju W, Jenkins EC, et al: Genetic analysis of
first-trimester miscarriages with a combination of cytogenetic
karyotyping, microsatellite genotyping and arrayCGH. Clin Genet.
75:133–140. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
12
|
Kearney HM, Kearney JB and Conlin LK:
Diagnostic implications of excessive homozygosity detected by
SNP-based microarrays: Consanguinity, uniparental disomy and
recessive single-gene mutations. Clin Lab Med. 31:595–613. 2011.
View Article : Google Scholar
|
13
|
Jobanputra V, Sobrino A, Kinney A, Kline J
and Warburton D: Multiplex interphase FISH as a screen for common
aneuploidies in spontaneous abortions. Hum Reprod. 17:1166–1170.
2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
14
|
Furtado LV, Paxton CN, Jama MA, Tripp SR,
Wilson AR, Lyon E, Jarboe EA, Thaker HM and Geiersbach KB:
Diagnostic utility of microsatellite genotyping for molar pregnancy
testing. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 137:55–63. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
15
|
Chiang S, Fazlollahi L, Nguyen A, Betensky
RA, Roberts DJ and Iafrate AJ: Diagnosis of hydatidiform moles by
polymorphic deletion probe fluorescence in situ hybridization. J
Mol Diagn. 13:406–415. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
16
|
Menten B, Swerts K, Delle Chiaie B,
Janssens S, Buysse K, Philippé J and Speleman F: Array comparative
genomic hybridization and flow cytometry analysis of spontaneous
abortions and mors in utero samples. BMC Med Genet. 10:892009.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
17
|
Robberecht C, Schuddinck V, Fryns JP and
Vermeesch JR: Diagnosis of miscarriages by molecular karyotyping:
Benefits and pitfalls. Genet Med. 11:646–654. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
18
|
Wheeler E, Huang N, Bochukova EG, Keogh
JM, Lindsay S, Garg S, Henning E, Blackburn H, Loos RJ, Wareham NJ,
et al: Genome-wide SNP and CNV analysis identifies common and
low-frequency variants associated with severe early-onset obesity.
Nat Genet. 45:513–517. 2013. View
Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
19
|
Winchester L and Ragoussis J: Algorithm
implementation for CNV discovery using Affymetrix and Illumina SNP
array data. Methods Mol Biol. 838:291–310. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
20
|
Fowler DJ, Lindsay I, Seckl MJ and Sebire
NJ: Histomorphometric features of hydatidiform moles in early
pregnancy: Relationship to detectability by ultrasound examination.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 29:76–80. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar
|
21
|
Fowler DJ, Lindsay I, Seckl MJ and Sebire
NJ: Routine pre-evacuation ultrasound diagnosis of hydatidiform
mole: Experience of more than 1000 cases from a regional referral
center. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 27:56–60. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar
|
22
|
Grinschgl I, Mannweiler S, Holzapfel-Bauer
M, Pferschy U, Hoefler G and Guertl B: The role of morphology in
combination with ploidy analysis in characterizing early
gestational abortion. Virchows Arch. 462:175–182. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar
|
23
|
Kipp BR, Ketterling RP, Oberg TN, Cousin
MA, Plagge AM, Wiktor AE, Ihrke JM, Meyers CH, Morice WG, Halling
KC and Clayton AC: Comparison of fluorescence in situ
hybridization, p57 immunostaining, flow cytometry and digital image
analysis for diagnosing molar and nonmolar products of conception.
Am J Clin Pathol. 133:196–204. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
24
|
Butler JM: Short tandem repeat typing
technologies used in human identity testing. BioTechniques.
43:ii–v. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
25
|
Murphy KM, McConnell TG, Hafez MJ, Vang R
and Ronnett BM: Molecular genotyping of hydatidiform moles:
Analytic validation of a multiplex short tandem repeat assay. J Mol
Diagn. 11:598–605. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
26
|
Popiolek DA, Yee H, Mittal K, Chiriboga L,
Prinz MK, Caragine TA and Budimlija ZM: Multiplex short tandem
repeat DNA analysis confirms the accuracy of p57 (KIP2)
immunostaining in the diagnosis of complete hydatidiform mole.
Human Pathol. 37:1426–1434. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar
|
27
|
McConnell TG, Murphy KM, Hafez M, Vang R
and Ronnett BM: Diagnosis and subclassification of hydatidiform
moles using p57 immunohistochemistry and molecular genotyping:
Validation and prospective analysis in routine and consultation
practice settings with development of an algorithmic approach. Am J
Surg Pathol. 33:805–817. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
28
|
Daniely M, Aviram-Goldring A, Barkai G and
Goldman B: Detection of chromosomal aberration in fetuses arising
from recurrent spontaneous abortion by comparative genomic
hybridization. Human Reprod. 13:805–809. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar
|
29
|
Lomax B, Tang S, Separovic E, Phillips D,
Hillard E, Thomson T and Kalousek DK: Comparative genomic
hybridization in combination with flow cytometry improves results
of cytogenetic analysis of spontaneous abortions. Am J Hum Genet.
66:1516–1521. 2000. View
Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
30
|
Schwartz S: Clinical utility of single
nucleotide polymorphism arrays. Clin Lab Med. 31:581–594. 2011.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
31
|
Zaragoza MV, Surti U, Redline RW, Millie
E, Chakravarti A and Hassold TJ: Parental origin and phenotype of
triploidy in spontaneous abortions: Predominance of diandry and
association with the partial hydatidiform mole. Am J Hum Genet.
66:1807–1820. 2000. View
Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
32
|
Conlin LK, Thiel BD, Bonnemann CG, Medne
L, Ernst LM, Zackai EH, Deardorff MA, Krantz ID, Hakonarson H and
Spinner NB: Mechanisms of mosaicism, chimerism and uniparental
disomy identified by single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis.
Hum Mol Genet. 19:1263–1275. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|