A semi‑automated FISH‑based micronucleus‑centromere assay for biomonitoring of hospital workers exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation

Vral,Anne; Decorte,Veerle; Depuydt,Julie; Wambersie,André; Thierens,Hubert

doi:10.3892/mmr.2016.5265

A semi‑automated FISH‑based micronucleus‑centromere assay for biomonitoring of hospital workers exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation

Authors:
- Anne Vral
- Veerle Decorte
- Julie Depuydt
- André Wambersie
- Hubert Thierens
View Affiliations

Affiliations: Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Ghent University, B‑9000 Ghent, Belgium, Scientific Committee Centre de Services Interentreprises, External Service For Prevention and Protection at Work, B‑1200 Brussels, Belgium, Institute of Experimental and Clinical Research, Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology Unit, Catholic University of Louvain, St‑Luc Clinical University, B‑1200 Brussels, Belgium
Published online on: May 13, 2016 https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2016.5265
Pages: 103-110
Copyright: © Vral et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to perform cytogenetic analysis by means of a semi‑automated micronucleus‑centromere assay in lymphocytes from medical radiation workers. Two groups of workers receiving the highest occupational doses were selected: 10 nuclear medicine technicians and 10 interventional radiologists/cardiologists. Centromere‑negative micronucleus (MNCM‑) data, obtained from these two groups of medical radiation workers were compared with those obtained in matched controls. The blood samples of the matched controls were additionally used to construct a ‘low‑dose’ (0‑100 mGy) MNCM‑ dose‑response curve to evaluate the sensitivity and suitability of the micronucleus‑centromere assay as an ‘effect’ biomarker in medical surveillance programs. The physical dosimetry data of the 3 years preceding the blood sampling, based on single or double dosimetry practices, were collected for the interpretation of the micronucleus data. The in vitro radiation results showed that for small sized groups, semi‑automated scoring of MNCM‑ enables the detection of a dose of 50 mGy. The comparison of MNCM‑ yields in medical radiation workers and control individuals showed enhanced MNCM‑ scores in the medical radiation workers group (P=0.15). The highest MNCM‑ scores were obtained in the interventional radiologists/cardiologists group, and these scores were significantly higher compared with those obtained from the matched control group (P=0.05). The higher MNCM‑ scores observed in interventional radiologists/cardiologists compared with nuclear medicine technicians were not in agreement with the personal dosimetry records in both groups, which may point to the limitation of ‘double dosimetry’ procedures used in interventional radiology/cardiology. In conclusion, the data obtained in the present study supports the importance of cytogenetic analysis, in addition to physical dosimetry, as a routine biomonitoring method in medical radiation workers receiving the highest occupational radiation burdens.

View Figures

View References

1	Zakeri F and Hirobe T: A cytogenetic approach to the effects of low levels of ionizing radiations on occupationally exposed individuals. Eur J Radiol. 73:191–195. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar
2	Ropolo M, Balia C, Roggieri P, Lodi V, Nucci MC, Violante FS, Silingardi P, Colacci A and Bolognesi C: The micronucleus assay as a biological dosimeter in hospital workers exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation. Mutat Res. 747:7–13. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
3	Martin CJ, Sutton DG, West CM and Wright EG: The radio-biology/radiation protection interface in healthcare. J Radiol Prot. 29:A1–A20. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar
4	Thierens H, Vral A, Morthier R, Aousalah B and De Ridder L: Cytogenetic monitoring of hospital workers occupationally exposed to ionizing radiation using the micronucleus centromere assay. Mutagenesis. 15:245–249. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
5	Cardoso RS, Takahashi-Hyodo S, Peitl P Jr, Ghilardi-Neto T and Sakamoto-Hojo ET: Evaluation of chromosomal aberrations, micronuclei and sister chromatid exchanges in hospital workers chronically exposed to ionizing radiation. Teratog Carcinog Mutagen. 21:431–439. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar
6	Dias FL, Antunes LM, Rezende PA, Carvalho FE, Silva CM, Matheus JM, Oliveira JV Jr, Lopes GP, Pereira GA and Balarin MA: Cytogenetic analysis in lymphocytes from workers occupationally exposed to low levels of ionizing radiation. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 23:228–233. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
7	Montoro A, Rodríguez P, Almonacid M, Villaescusa JI, Verdú G, Caballín MR, Barrios L and Barquinero JF: Biological dosimetry in a group of radiologists by the analysis of dicentrics and trans-locations. Radiat Res. 164:612–617. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
8	International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA): Emergency Preparedness and Response Biodosimetry 2011: Cytogenetic Dosimetry: Applications in preparedness for a response to radiation emergencies. IAEA; Vienna, Austria: 2011
9	Baeyens A, Swanson R, Herd O, Ainsbury E, Mabhengu T, Willem P, Thierens H, Slabbert JP and Vral A: A semi-automated micronucleus-centromere assay to assess low-dose radiation exposure in human lymphocytes. Int J Radiat Biol. 87:923–931. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
10	Von Boetticher H, Lachmund J and Hoffmann W: An analytic approach to double dosimetry algorithms in occupational dosimetry using energy dependent organ dose conversion coefficients. Health Phys. 99:800–805. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
11	International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP): The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103, Ann ICRP. 37:2–4. 2007.
12	Thierens H, De Ruyck K, Vral A, de Gelder V, Whitehouse CA, Tawn EJ and Boesman I: Cytogenetic biodosimetry of an accidental exposure of a radiological worker using multiple assays. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 113:408–414. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
13	Willems P, August L, Slabbert J, Romm H, Oestreicher U, Thierens H and Vral A: Automated micronucleus (MN) scoring for population triage in case of large scale radiation events. Int J Radiat Biol. 86:2–11. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
14	Schunck C, Johannes T, Varga D, Lörch T and Plesch A: New developments in automated cytogenetic imaging: Unattended scoring of dicentric chromosomes, micronuclei, single cell gel electrophoresis, and fluorescence signals. Cytogenet Genome Res. 104:383–389. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
15	Wojcik A, Kowalska M, Bouzyk E, Buraczewska I, Kobialko G, Jarocewicz N and Szumiel I: Validation of the micro-nucleus-centromere assay for biological dosimetry. Gen Mol Biol. 23:1083–1085. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar
16	Pala FS, Alkaya F, Tabakcioglu K, Tokatli F, Uzal C, Parlar S and Algünes C: The effects of micronuclei with whole chromosome on biological dose estimation. Turkish J Biol. 32:283–290. 2008.
17	Romm H, Ainsbury E, Barnard S, Barrios L, Barquinero JF, Beinke C, Deperas M, Gregoire E, Koivistoinen A, Lindholm C, et al: Automatic scoring of dicentric chromosomes as a tool in large scale radiation accidents. Mutat Res. 756:174–183. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
18	Norppa H and Falck GC: What do human micronuclei contain? Mutagenesis. 18:221–233. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
19	Lindberg HK, Falck GC, Järventaus H and Norppa H: Characterization of chromosomes and chromosomal fragments in human lymphocyte micronuclei by telomeric and centromeric FISH. Mutagenesis. 23:371–376. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
20	Järvinen H, Buls N, Clerinx P, Jansen J, Miljanić S, Nikodemová D, Ranogajec-Komor M and d'Errico F: Overview of double dosimetry procedures for the determination of the effective dose to the interventional radiology staff. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 129:333–339. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
21	Järvinen H, Buls N, Clerinx P, Miljanic S, Nikodemová D, Ranogajec-Komor M, Struelens L and d'Errico F: Comparison of double dosimetry algorithms for estimating the effective dose in occupational dosimetry of interventional radiology staff. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 131:80–86. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI