Knockdown of macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 in RPMI-8226 human multiple myeloma cells inhibits osteoclastic differentiation through inhibiting the RANKL-Erk1/2 signaling pathway

Introduction

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant cancer of plasma cells, which represent ~13% of all hematological malignancies (1), with >80% of patients with MM developing myeloma bone disease (MBD). MBD is characterized by severe bone pain, vertebral compression fractures and pathological fractures, which are caused by osteoclastic bone resorption and impaired osteoblastic bone formation induced by the interaction between myeloma cells and the bone marrow microenvironment. However, the molecular mechanism by which MM leads to the development of MBD remains to be elucidated.

Genes that are expressed at high levels in the bone marrow of patients with MM have been identified (2), one of which is macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 (MIC-1). MIC-1 belongs to the human transforming growth factor β superfamily. Also known as growth differentiation factor-15, placental bone morphogenetic protein, prostate-derived factor and NSAID-activated gene-1 (3–6), MIC-1 has multiple functions. In a previous in vitro study, MIC-1 was shown to inhibit the activation of macrophages (7). MIC-1 may be an important factor in the development of several types of tumor, including MM (8). In patients with MM, MIC-1 is expressed at high levels in the mesenchymal stem cells of the bone marrow, and high levels of MIC-1 in the patients' serum predicts a poor prognosis (2). MIC-1 may be involved in osteoclastogenesis; in patients with prostate cancer with bone metastases, MIC-1 has been found to induce the maturation of osteoclasts (9). However, whether MIC-1 is involved in the development of MBD in patients with MM remains to be elucidated. In present study, in order to evaluate the effect of target inhibition of MIC-1 in RPMI-8226 cells on osteoclastic differentiation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNCs) and the mechanisms by which MIC-1 contributes to the maturation of osteoclasts, a lentiviral RNAi system directed toward the MIC-1 gene was designed and constructed in RPMI-8226 cells. A co-culture system was used in the present study to determine the role of MIC-1 on osteoclastic differentiation. The results from the present study offered a potential strategy for the treatment of MBD in patients with MM.

Materials and methods

Preparation of the lentiviral vector bearing MIC-1 short hairpin (sh)RNA

To understand the potential effect of MIC-1 in RPMI-8226 cells, an MIC-1 shRNA was designed to specifically knock down the gene expression of MIC-1. The MIC-1 shRNA was designed by Genechem (Shanghai, China), based on the MIC-1 cDNA sequence (GenBank accession no. AF019770.1; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/AF019770.1). A control shRNA encoding a nonspecific shRNA was used as a negative control. The MIC-1 shRNA and negative control shRNA were synthesized by Genechem (Shanghai, China). The synthesized oligonucleotides were designed, synthesized and inserted into a GV115 vector (GeneChem) to construct a lentiviral vector, according to the manufacturer's protocol, to generate lentiviral transfer plasmids: Lv-shRNA, bearing MIC-1 shRNA, and Lv-NC, bearing control shRNA as a negative control. The control shRNA had no significant homology to any human gene sequence. The lentiviral vectors were prepared by transfecting the Lv-shRNA or Lv-NC with packaging plasmids into 293T cells, as described previously (10).

Cell culture and lentiviral transduction

The RPMI-8226 cells (Wuhan University, Wuhan, China) were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. After 3 days, the RPMI-8226 cells were transduced with the lentiviral vectors at a multiplicity of infection of 15 in the presence of 2 µg/ml polybrene (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Following incubation at 37°C for 8 h, the cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and the mRNA and protein levels of MIC-1 in the cells were measured using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and Western blot analyses, respectively, to evaluate the viral infection efficiency.

RT-qPCR

Total RNA was extracted from the cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The RNA (4 µg) was reverse transcribed into cDNA using Thermoscript RT-PCR System reagent (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), according to the manufacturer's protocol, prior for use in qPCR. The qPCR was performed on an Applied Biosystems PRISM 7300 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) using a SYBR Green PCR master mix (DRR041A; Takara Bio, Inc., Tokyo, Japan). A total volume of 20μl, containing 2μl cDNA, 10μl SYBR Premix Ex Taq, 0.4μl Forward Primer, 0.4μl Reverse Primer, 0.4μl ROX Reference Dye II and 6.8μl dH2O, was used in the q-PCR reaction. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate. The quantification cycle (Cq) value of each sample was normalized to an endogenous control, GAPDH. The 2−ΔΔCq method was used to relatively quantify the mRNA levels of MIC-1 (11). The primer (Genechem) sequences for human MIC-1 were: Sense 5′-GTTGCGGAAACGCTACGA−3′ and antisense 5′-AACAGAGCCCGGTGAAGG-3′. Primers for the control (GAPDH) were: Sense 5′-TGACTTCAACAGCGACACCCA-3′ and antisense 5′-CACCCTGTTGCTGTAGCCAAA-3′. The qPCR program was as follows: 45 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec, 60°C for 30 sec and 72°C for 45 sec, followed by 72°C for 10 min.

Isolation and culture of PBMNCs

The PBMNCs were isolated, as described previously (10) from the peripheral blood of healthy donors, who had provided written informed consent. The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Fujian Medical University. A total of 10 ml human blood was obtaubed from peripheral blood samples, and was mixed with 10 ml lymphocyte separation medium (Hao Yang Biological Manufacture Co. Ltd., Tianjin, China) in a centrifuge tube. The mixture was centrifuged at 2,000 × g at room temperature for 20 mins. Following washing with PBS once and α-minimal essential medium (α-MEM) twice, the nucleated cells were grown in α-MEM supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS), 50 ng/ml macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF; PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA) and 100 ng/ml receptor activator of nuclear factor-кB ligand (RANKL; Peprotech) at 37°C in 5% CO2 humidified air. The medium was replaced every 3 days.

Co-culture system

To investigate the potential effect of MIC-1 on the differentiation capacity of the PBMNCs, a Transwell insert system (Corning, Inc., New York, NY, USA) was used (Fig. 1) to co-culture the PBMNCs (1×106 cells/well) and the RPMI-8226 cells (2×103 cells/well) transduced with Lv-shRNA or Lv-NC. The PBMNCs were seeded into the lower compartment following placement of a cover glass and dentine slides on the bottom. The cells were cultured in α-MEM (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) containing 10% FBS, 50 ng/ml M-CSF and 100 ng/ml RANKL. After 12 h of culture at 37°C in 5% CO2, the non-adherent cells in the culture were removed by gently washing with fresh medium; the RPMI-8226 cells transduced with Lv-shRNA or Lv-NC were cultured in the upper compartment. RPMI-8226 cells without viral transduction were also used as a control.

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the Transwell system used to co-culture the PBMNCs and RPMI-8226 cells. PBMNCs, peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining and resorption pit formation assay

The PBMNCs (1×106 cells/well), which were cultured on cover glasses and dentine slides for 14 or 21 days, were stained using a leukocyte acid phosphatase kit (Sigma-Aldrich), and the cells were then counterstained with hematoxylin (Sigma-Aldrich), as previously described (10). A mature osteoclast was identified as a cell with at least three TRAP-positive nuclei. To determine the number of mature osteoclasts in each group, 10 randomly selected fields from the three cultures in each group were examined under a microscope (BX43; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). For the resorption pit assay, the cells on dentine slices were stained with toluidine blue and then scanned under a microscope (BX43; Olympus). Osteoclastic bone resorption was measured, based on the area of resorption pits per field from three cultures in each group.

Western blot analysis

The PBMNCs were harvested after co-culture for 14 days for protein analysis. The protein extracts from these cells were separated by 6–15% SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis and then transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) membranes. Following blocking with Tris-buffered saline with 0.2% Tween (TBST) containing 5% non-fat milk at 4°C overnight, the membranes were incubated with the following antibodies diluted in TBST for 2 h at 4°C: Rabbit anti-RANKL (cat no. sc-9073; 1:2,000), rabbit anti–GAPDH (cat no. sc-25778; 1:2,000), rabbit anti-c-fos (cat no. sc-52, 1:2,000), rabbit anti-c-Jun N-terminal kinase (c-JNK; cat no. sc-572; 1:2,000), rabbit anti-p-c-Jun N-terminal kinase (p-c-JNK; cat no. sc-135642; 1:2,000), rabbit anti-P-38 (cat no. sc-535; 1:2,000), rabbit anti-p-P-38 (cat no. sc-101759; 1:2,000), rabbit anti-c-jun (cat no. sc-44; 1:2,000), rabbit anti-p-c-jun (cat no. sc-7980-R; 1:2,000), all purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA, USA), and rabbit anti-extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (Erk1/2; cat no. 4695; 1:2,000; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA) or rabbit anti- p-Erk1/2 (cat no. 4376; 1:2,000; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA). Following washing three times with TBST (pH 7.5), the membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (cat no. bs-0295G; 1:1,000; Beijing Biosynthesis Biotechnology, Beijing, China) for 1 h at room temperature. The membranes were washed three times with TBST (pH 7.5). The resulting protein bands were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence reagent kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 16.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. One-way analysis of variance and Student-Newman-Keuls analysis were used to evaluate the statistical significance of differences among the groups. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Expression of MIC-1 in RPMI-8226 cells

To determine whether MIC-1 shRNA successfully knocked down the gene expression of MIC-1, the present study prepared lentiviral vectors bearing either MIC-1 shRNA (Lv-shRNA) or non-specific sequence (Lv-NC). Following transduction with Lv-shRNA or Lv-NC for 14 days, the RPMI-8226 cells were harvested and the expression levels of MIC-1 in these cells were analyzed using RT-qPCR and Western blot analyses. As shown in Fig. 2, the mRNA and protein levels of MIC-1 were significantly lower in the cells transduced with Lv-shRNA, compared with those in the cells transduced with Lv-NC or those without viral tranduction.

Figure 2. MIC-1 shRNA decreases the expression of MIC-1 in RPMI-8226 cells. RPMI-8226 cells were transduced with Lv-shRNA or Lv-NC. At day 14-post transduction, the cells were harvested and the expression of MIC-1 was analyzed. (A and B) The relative mRNA levels were analyzed by RT-qPCR, (C) real-tim PCR analysis of the mRNA expression levels of MIC-1 and (D and E) western blot analysis to assess protein expression levels. were performed GADPH was used as an internal control for each analysis. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. *P<0.05, vs. Lv-NC or blank group. Blank, cells without viral transduction; Lv-NC, cells transduced with Lv-NC; Lv-shRNA, cells transduced with Lv-shRNA. shRNA, short hairpin RNA; NC, negative control; MIC-1, macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1.

MIC-1 is essential for the osteoclastic differentiation of PBMNCs

To investigate the role of MIC-1 in the osteoclastic differentiation of PBMNCs, the PBMNCs were stained for TRAP following co-culture with RPMI-8226 cells for 14 days. The number of TRAP(+) cells was significantly lower when the PBMNCs were co-cultured with the RPMI-8226 cells transduced with Lv-shRNA, compared with when they were co-cultured with RPMI-8226 cells transduced with Lv-NC or without viral transduction (Fig. 3A and B). To investigate the role of MIC-1 in bone resorption by differentiated PBMNCs, the PBMNCs were stained with toluidine blue following co-culture with RPMI-8226 cells for 14 days. The percentage of pit area within a randomly selected area was significantly lower when the PBMNCs were co-cultured with the RPMI-8226 cells transduced with Lv-shRNA, compared with those co-cultured with the RPMI-8226 cells transduced with Lv-NC or without viral transduction (Fig. 3C and D). Taken together, these results suggested that MIC-1 was required for the osteoclastic differentiation and bone resorption activities of PBMNCs.

Figure 3. Osteoclastic differentiation of PBMNCs co-cultured with RPMI-8226 cells. PBMNCs were co-cultured with RPMI-8266 cells infected with Lv-shRNA or Lv-NC. At day 14-post infection, the PBMNCs were stained with (A) TRAP (magnification, ×400) and the (B) numbers of TRAP-positive cells were counted per randomly selected field. (C) Toluidine blue staining (magnification, ×200) was performed for the resorption pit assay, and the (D) resorption pit area per randomly selected field was calculated. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. *P<0.05, vs. Lv-NC or blank group. shRNA, short hairpin RNA; NC, negative control; MIC-1, macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1; TRAP, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase.

To confirm the role of MIC-1 in the osteoclastic differentiation of PBMNCs, the present study examined whether the expression of the osteoclast-specific gene, RANKL, was altered by the decreased expression of MIC-1. As shown in Fig. 4A and B, the protein level of RANKL in the PBMNCs was significantly lower when the cells were co-cultured with the RPMI-8226 cells transduced with Lv-shRNA, compared with those co-cultured with the RPMI-8226 cells transduced with Lv-NC or without viral transduction.

Figure 4. Expression of RANKL and the phosphorylation status of the Erk1/2 signaling pathway in PBMNCs. PBMNCs were co-cultured with RPMI-8226 cells infected with Lv-shRNA or Lv-NC for 14 days prior to harvesting for the analysis of the expression levels of (A) RANKL and c-fos, and the phosphorylation status of c-jun. GADPH was used as internal control. (B) Densitometric analysis of the western blot was performed. (C) The phosphorylation status of Erk1/2, p-38 and c-JNK was determined by western blotting. (D) Densitometric analysis of the western blot was performed. The data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (*P<0.05 vs. Lv-NC group or Blank group). Blank, cells without viral transduction; PBMNCs, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; shRNA, short hairpin RNA; NC, negative control; RANKL, receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand; p-ERK, phosphorylated-extracellular signal-regulated kinase; t-ERK, total ERK; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase.

Subsequently, the present study investigated which signaling pathway was activated by RANKL by analyzing the phosphorylation status of the ERK1/2, c-JNK and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) proteins using Western blot analysis. It was found that the protein levels of phosphorylated Erk1/2, but not those of c-JNK or p38, were significantly lower in the PBMNCs co-cultured with the RPMI-8226 cells transduced with Lv-shRNA, compared with those co-cultured with RPMI-8226 cells transduced with Lv-NC or without viral transduction (Fig. 4C and D), indicating that the MCI-1-induced increase in RANKL may activate the Erk1/2 pathway.

The present study then investigated whether c-fos and c-jun, important downstream molecules of ERK1/2, were involved in the differentiation of osteoclasts by analyzing the phosphorylation status of c-fos and c-jun using Western blot analysis. It was found that the protein levels of total c-fos were markedly reduced in the PBMNCs co-cultured with the RPMI-8226 cells transduced with Lv-shRNA, compared with those co-cultured with the RPMI-8226 cells transduced with Lv-NC or without viral transduction. However, no changes were observed in the protein levels of total c-jun or phosphorylated c-jun in the PBMNCs co-cultured with the RPMI-8226 cells transduced with either Lv-shRNA or Lv-NC (Fig. 4C and D). Taken together, these results suggested that MIC-1 regulated the osteoclastic differentiation and bone resorption activities of the PBMNCs via the Erk1/2 signaling pathway.

Discussion

In the present study, the role of MIC-1 in the osteoclastic differentiation of PBMNCs was examined. A co-culture system was used, in which PBMNCs co-cultured with RPMI-8226 cells were induced to differentiate into osteoclasts and to resorb bone. To knock down the expression of MIC-1 in the RPMI-8226 cells, a lentiviral vector was used to deliver the MIC-1 shRNA to the RPMI-8226 cells. It was found that MIC-1 shRNA efficiently decreased the expression of MIC-1 in the RPMI-8226 cells (Fig. 2). The present study then demonstrated that reduced expression of MIC-1 inhibited the osteoclastic differentiation of PBMNCs (Fig. 3). Finally, it was shown that the expression of the osteoclast-specific gene, RANKL, and the levels of dephosphorylated Erk1/2 were decreased in those PBMNCs, which were co-cultured with the RPMI-8226 cells transduced with Lv-shRNA (Fig. 4A and C). These results led to the conclusion that MIC-1 promoted osteoclastic differentiation of PBMNCs through inhibition of the RANKL-Erk1/2 signaling pathway.

Patients with MM often develop MBD with osteoclastic differentiation, induced by cytokines and other soluble factors in the bone marrow (12). In the bone marrow of patients with MM, MIC-1 is expressed at high levels (2). It has been suggested that MIC-1 may be involved in the regulation of osteoclastogenesis (13,14). The results of the study demonstrated that MIC-1 was required in order for RPMI-8226 to induce osteoclastic differentiation of the PBMNCs (Figs. 3 and 4), supporting the role of MCI-1 in the development of MBD in patients with MM.

The osteoclast-specific marker gene, RANKL, is involved in MCI-1 stimulated osteoclastic differentiation. Binding to its receptor RANK, RANKL stimulates the osteoclastic differentiation of monocyte macrophages and the maturation of osteoclasts (15). In RANKL-deficient mice, severe osteopetrosis and a defect in tooth eruption have been observed (16). In patients with MM, RANKL has been shown to be involved osteoclastic differentiation (17–19). In the present study, it was shown that the expression of RANKL in the PBMNCs was reduced when the expression of MIC-1 in the co-cultured RPMI-8226 cells was knocked down (Fig. 4). RANKL binds to RANK and activates several MAPK signaling pathways (20), including the Erk1/2, JNK and P-38 pathways (21). The present study demonstrated that reduced expression of MIC-1 in the RPMI-8226 cells appeared to decrease the phosphorylation of Erk1/2, but not JNK or P-38, indicating the involvement of the Erk1/2 pathway in MIC-1-induced osteoclastic differentiation of PBMNCs (22,23). Consistent with this observation, the expression levels of c-fos and c-jun, downstream molecules of the Erk1/2 signaling pathway in PBMNCs, were also decreased when the expression of MCI-1 in the co-cultured RPMI-8226 cells was reduced.

In conclusion, the present study found that MIC-1 was involved in the development of MBD in patients with MM by promoting the osteoclastic differentiation of PBMNCs by activating the RANKL-Erk1/2 signaling pathway. Thus, MIC-1 may offer potential as a target gene in the development of strategies to treat MM.

References