|
1
|
Asa'ad F, Pagni G, Pilipchuk SP, Gianni
AB, Giannobile WV and Rasperini G: 3D-printed scaffolds and
biomaterials: Review of alveolar bone augmentation and periodontal
regeneration applications. Int J Dent. 2016:12398422016.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
2
|
Teven CM, Fisher S, Ameer GA, He TC and
Reid RR: Biomimetic approaches to complex craniofacial defects. Ann
Maxillofac Surg. 5:4–13. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3
|
Sheikh Z, Hamdan N, Ikeda Y, Grynpas M,
Ganss B and Glogauer M: Natural graft tissues and synthetic
biomaterials for periodontal and alveolar bone reconstructive
applications: A review. Biomater Res. 21:92017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4
|
Obregon F, Vaquette C, Ivanovski S,
Hutmacher DW and Bertassoni LE: Three-dimensional bioprinting for
regenerative dentistry and craniofacial tissue engineering. J Dent
Res. 94 9 Suppl:143S–152S. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
Hung BP, Naved BA, Nyberg EL, Dias M,
Holmes CA, Elisseeff JH, Dorafshar AH and Grayson WL:
Three-dimensional printing of bone extracellular matrix for
craniofacial regeneration. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2:1806–1816. 2016.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
6
|
Lu T, Li Y and Chen T: Techniques for
fabrication and construction of three-dimensional scaffolds for
tissue engineering. Int J Nanomedicine. 8:337–350. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
7
|
Nyberg EL, Farris AL, Hung BP, Dias M,
Garcia JR, Dorafshar AH and Grayson WL: 3D-printing technologies
for craniofacial rehabilitation, reconstruction, and regeneration.
Ann Biomed Eng. 45:45–57. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
8
|
Chia HN and Wu BM: Recent advances in 3D
printing of biomaterials. J Biol Eng. 9:42015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
9
|
Rasperini G, Pilipchuk SP, Flanagan CL,
Park CH, Pagni G, Hollister SJ and Giannobile WV: 3D-printed
bioresorbable scaffold for periodontal repair. J Dent Res. 942 9
Supp:153S–157S. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
10
|
Chou SF and Woodrow KA: Relationships
between mechanical properties and drug release from electrospun
fibers of PCL and PLGA blends. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater.
65:724–733. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
11
|
Li X, Yang C, Li L, Xiong J, Xie L, Yang
B, Yu M, Feng L, Jiang Z, Guo W and Tian W: A therapeutic strategy
for spinal cord defect: Human dental follicle cells combined with
aligned PCL/PLGA electrospun material. Biomed Res Int.
2015:1971832015.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
12
|
Jensen T, Blanchette A, Vadasz S, Dave A,
Canfarotta M, Sayej WN and Finck C: Biomimetic and synthetic
esophageal tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 57:133–141. 2015.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
13
|
Zong C, Wang M, Yang F, Chen G, Chen J,
Tang Z, Liu Q, Gao C, Ma L and Wang J: A novel therapy strategy for
bile duct repair using tissue engineering technique: PCL/PLGA
bilayered scaffold with hMSCs. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 11:966–976.
2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
14
|
Trajano VCC, Costa KJR, Lanza CRM,
Sinisterra RD and Cortes ME: Osteogenic activity of
cyclodextrin-encapsulated doxycycline in a calcium phosphate PCL
and PLGA composite. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 64:370–375.
2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
15
|
Franco RA, Nguyen TH and Lee BT:
Preparation and characterization of electrospun PCL/PLGA membranes
and chitosan/gelatin hydrogels for skin bioengineering
applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 22:2207–2218. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
16
|
Baker SC, Rohman G, Southgate J and
Cameron NR: The relationship between the mechanical properties and
cell behaviour on PLGA and PCL scaffolds for bladder tissue
engineering. Biomaterials. 30:1321–1328. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
17
|
Subramanian A, Krishnan UM and Sethuraman
S: Fabrication, characterization and in vitro evaluation of aligned
PLGA-PCL nanofibers for neural regeneration. Ann Biomed Eng.
40:2098–2110. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18
|
Qian Y, Chen H, Xu Y, Yang J, Zhou X,
Zhang F and Gu N: The preosteoblast response of electrospinning
PLGA/PCL nanofibers: Effects of biomimetic architecture and
collagen I. Int J Nanomedicine. 11:4157–4171. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
19
|
Mrozik K, Gronthos S, Shi S and Bartold
PM: A method to isolate, purify, and characterize human periodontal
ligament stem cells. Methods Mol Biol. 666:269–284. 2010.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
20
|
Zhu W and Liang M: Periodontal ligament
stem cells: Current status, concerns, and future prospects. Stem
Cells Int. 2015:9723132015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
21
|
Cha Y, Jeon M, Lee HS, Kim S, Kim SO, Lee
JH and Song JS: Effects of in vitro osteogenic induction on in vivo
tissue regeneration by dental pulp and periodontal ligament stem
cells. J Endod. 41:1462–1468. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
22
|
Moshaverinia A, Xu X, Chen C, Ansari S,
Zadeh HH, Snead ML and Shi S: Application of stem cells derived
from the periodontal ligament or gingival tissue sources for tendon
tissue regeneration. Biomaterials. 35:2642–2650. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
23
|
Zhang H, Liu S, Zhu B, Xu Q, Ding Y and
Jin Y: Composite cell sheet for periodontal regeneration: Crosstalk
between different types of MSCs in cell sheet facilitates complex
periodontal-like tissue regeneration. Stem Cell Res Ther.
7:1682016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
24
|
Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of
relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and
the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
25
|
Bruzauskaite I, Bironaite D, Bagdonas E
and Bernotiene E: Scaffolds and cells for tissue regeneration:
Different scaffold pore sizes-different cell effects.
Cytotechnology. 68:355–369. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
26
|
Karageorgiou V and Kaplan D: Porosity of
3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials.
26:5474–5491. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
27
|
Levenberg S, Rouwkema J, Macdonald M,
Garfein ES, Kohane DS, Darland DC, Marini R, van Blitterswijk CA,
Mulligan RC, D'Amore PA and Langer R: Engineering vascularized
skeletal muscle tissue. Nat Biotechnol. 23:879–884. 2005.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
28
|
Osorio R, Alfonso-Rodriguez CA, Osorio E,
Medina-Castillo AL, Alaminos M, Toledano-Osorio M and Toledano M:
Novel potential scaffold for periodontal tissue engineering. Clin
Oral Investig. 21:2695–2707. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
29
|
Makadia HK and Siegel SJ: Poly
Lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) as biodegradable controlled drug
delivery carrier. Polymers (Basel). 3:1377–1397. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
30
|
Rhee SH and Lee SJ: Effect of acidic
degradation products of poly(lactic-co-glycolic)acid on the
apatite-forming ability of poly(lactic-co-glycolic)acid-siloxane
nanohybrid material. J Biomed Mater Res A. 83:799–805. 2007.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
31
|
Prakasam M, Locs J, Salma-Ancane K, Loca
D, Largeteau A and Berzina-Cimdina L: Biodegradable materials and
metallic Implants-a review. J Funct Biomater. 8:pii: E44. 2017.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
32
|
Pulyala P, Singh A, Dias-Netipanyj MF,
Cogo SC, Santos LS, Soares P, Gopal V, Suganthan V, Manivasagam G
and Popat KC: In-vitro cell adhesion and proliferation of adipose
derived stem cell on hydroxyapatite composite surfaces. Mater Sci
Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 75:1305–1316. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
33
|
He HY, Zhang JY, Mi X, Hu Y and Gu XY:
Rapid prototyping for tissue-engineered bone scaffold by 3D
printing and biocompatibility study. Int J Clin Exp Med.
8:11777–11785. 2015.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
34
|
Sa M and Kim JY: Effect of various
blending ratios on the cell characteristics of PCL and PLGA
scaffolds fabricated by polymer deposition system. Int J Precis Eng
Man1. 4:649–655. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
35
|
Shahrousvand M, Sadeghi GMM, Shahrousvand
E, Ghollasi M and Salimi A: Superficial physicochemical properties
of polyurethane biomaterials as osteogenic regulators in human
mesenchymal stem cells fates. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces.
156:292–304. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
36
|
Folkman J and Moscona A: Role of cell
shape in growth control. Nature. 273:345–349. 1978. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
37
|
Uzer G, Pongkitwitoon S, Chan Ete M and
Judex S: Vibration induced osteogenic commitment of mesenchymal
stem cells is enhanced by cytoskeletal remodeling but not fluid
shear. J Biomech. 46:2296–2302. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
38
|
Mathieu PS and Loboa EG: Cytoskeletal and
focal adhesion influences on mesenchymal stem cell shape,
mechanical properties, and differentiation down osteogenic,
adipogenic, and chondrogenic pathways. Tissue Eng Part B Rev.
18:436–444. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
39
|
Fu Y, Liu S, Cui SJ, Kou XX, Wang XD, Liu
XM, Sun Y, Wang GN, Liu Y and Zhou YH: Surface chemistry of
nanoscale mineralized collagen regulates periodontal ligament stem
cell fate. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 8:15958–15966. 2016.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
40
|
Thapa A, Webster TJ and Haberstroh KM:
Polymers with nano-dimensional surface features enhance bladder
smooth muscle cell adhesion. J Biomed Mater Res A. 67:1374–1383.
2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
41
|
Karagkiozaki V, Vavoulidis E,
Karagiannidis PG, Gioti M, Fatouros DG, Vizirianakis IS and
Logothetidis S: Development of a nanoporous and multilayer
drug-delivery platform for medical implants. Int J Nanomedicine.
7:5327–5338. 2012.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
42
|
Affrossman S, Henn G, O'Neill S, Pethrick
P and Stamm M: Surface topography and composition of deuterated
polystyrene-poly (bromostyrene) blends. Macromolecules.
29:5010–5016. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
43
|
Baker BM, Trappmann B, Wang WY, Sakar MS,
Kim IL, Shenoy VB, Burdick JA and Chen CS: Cell-mediated fibre
recruitment drives extracellular matrix mechanosensing in
engineered fibrillar microenvironments. Nat Mater. 14:1262–1268.
2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
44
|
Liao J, Wei Q, Zou Y, Fan J, Song D, Cui
J, Zhang W, Zhu Y, Ma C, Hu X, et al: Notch signaling augments
BMP9-induced bone formation by promoting the
osteogenesis-angiogenesis coupling process in mesenchymal stem
cells (MSCs). Cell Physiol Biochem. 41:1905–1923. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
45
|
Deng Y, Liu X, Xu A, Wang L, Luo Z, Zheng
Y, Deng F, Wei J, Tang Z and Wei S: Effect of surface roughness on
osteogenesis in vitro and osseointegration in vivo of carbon
fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone-nanohydroxyapatite composite.
Int J Nanomedicine. 10:1425–1447. 2015.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
46
|
Spriano S, Chandra Sarath V, Cochis A,
Uberti F, Rimondini L, Bertone E, Vitale A, Scolaro C, Ferrari M,
Cirisano F, et al: How do wettability, zeta potential and
hydroxylation degree affect the biological response of
biomaterials? Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 74:542–555. 2017.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
47
|
Ranella A, Barberoglou M, Bakogianni S,
Fotakis C and Stratakis E: Tuning cell adhesion by controlling the
roughness and wettability of 3D micro/nano silicon structures. Acta
Biomater. 6:2711–2720. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
48
|
Zhao G, Schwartz Z, Wieland M, Rupp F,
Geis-Gerstorfer J, Cochran DL and Boyan BD: High surface energy
enhances cell response to titanium substrate microstructure. J
Biomed Mater Res A. 74:49–58. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
