Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Oncology Letters
      • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • Information for Authors
    • Information for Reviewers
    • Information for Librarians
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Reviewers
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Login Register Submit
  • This site uses cookies
  • You can change your cookie settings at any time by following the instructions in our Cookie Policy. To find out more, you may read our Privacy Policy.

    I agree
Search articles by DOI, keyword, author or affiliation
Search
Advanced Search
presentation
Molecular Medicine Reports
Join Editorial Board Propose a Special Issue
Print ISSN: 1791-2997 Online ISSN: 1791-3004
Journal Cover
July-2020 Volume 22 Issue 1

Full Size Image

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

Journals

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.

Molecular Medicine Reports

Molecular Medicine Reports

Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.

Biomedical Reports

Biomedical Reports

Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.

World Academy of Sciences Journal

World Academy of Sciences Journal

Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.

International Journal of Epigenetics

International Journal of Epigenetics

Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.

Medicine International

Medicine International

An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.

Journal Cover
July-2020 Volume 22 Issue 1

Full Size Image

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

  • Article
  • Citations
    • Cite This Article
    • Download Citation
    • Create Citation Alert
    • Remove Citation Alert
    • Cited By
  • Similar Articles
    • Related Articles (in Spandidos Publications)
    • Similar Articles (Google Scholar)
    • Similar Articles (PubMed)
  • Download PDF
  • Download XML
  • View XML
Article Open Access

High glucose contributes to the polarization of peritoneal macrophages to the M2 phenotype in vivo and in vitro

  • Authors:
    • Jieshan Lin
    • Qingyu Kong
    • Wenke Hao
    • Wenxue Hu
  • View Affiliations / Copyright

    Affiliations: Department of Nephrology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangdong Provincial Geriatrics Institute, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, P.R. China, Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat‑sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, P.R. China
    Copyright: © Lin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
  • Pages: 127-134
    |
    Published online on: May 5, 2020
       https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2020.11130
  • Expand metrics +
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

This article is mentioned in:



Abstract

Glucose is the primary osmotic medium used in most peritoneal dialysis (PD) solutions, and long‑term exposure to high glucose is a major contributor to peritoneal fibrosis. Our previous study revealed that M2 macrophages participate in the development of PD‑related fibrosis in a rat model. In the present study, the effects of high glucose on peritoneal macrophage polarization in vivo and in vitro were further evaluated. Continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD) patients with an overnight dwell of 1.5 or 2.5% glucose dialysate were recruited for this study. Overnight effluent samples from patients with CAPD (2,000 ml) were centrifuged to collect cells from the peritoneal cavity. J774A.1 cells (murine macrophages from ascites) were cultured in different concentrations of glucose. Macrophage phenotype markers were detected by flow cytometry. The levels of cytokines in PD effluent and the supernatant of murine macrophages were detected by enzyme‑linked immunosorbent assays. The activity of arginase was determined by quantitative colorimetric analysis. In total, 107 CAPD subjects (92 patients using 1.5% glucose dialysate and 15 patients using 2.5% glucose dialysate) were recruited. The percentage of M1 macrophages (CD14‑ and CCr7‑positive cells) in the 1.5 and 2.5% glucose dialysate groups was 23.0±13.3 and 24.9±12.0%, respectively. The difference was not significant (P>0.05). The percentage of M2 macrophages (CD14‑ and CD206‑positive cells) in the 1.5% glucose dialysate group (36.2±11.4%) was significantly decreased compared to the 2.5% glucose dialysate group (43.2±7.4%) (P<0.05). Murine macrophages were cultured in a high‑glucose in vitro environment, and the percentage of M1 macrophages in 138.8 mmol/l glucose medium significantly increased over time. The percentage of M2 macrophages increased in a glucose concentration‑dependent and time‑dependent manner. Arginase 1 in murine macrophages and the level of transforming growth factor β1 in the supernatant increased in a glucose concentration‑dependent manner. In conclusion, high glucose contributed to the polarization of peritoneal macrophages to the M2 phenotype, which may play an important role in the pathogenesis of PD‑related fibrosis.

Introduction

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is widely used for the treatment of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (1). Glucose is the primary osmotic medium used in most PD solutions, and most PD patients undergo ultrafiltration through the use of high concentrations of glucose. Long-term exposure to a high concentration of glucose alters the structure and function of the peritoneal membrane, which may result in the development of peritoneal fibrosis and eventually cause peritoneal failure in PD patients (2,3). Certain studies have revealed that the immune function of the peritoneal cavity may be crucial for the development of PD-related perineal fibrosis (4,5).

Macrophages are ubiquitous tissue-resident components under homeostatic physiological conditions and are thought to serve as the first line of defence against infection (6). However, an increasing number of studies have revealed that they are a diverse set of cells polarized by different T-cell responses and cytokine environments. Generally, macrophages can be divided into classically activated macrophages (M1) and alternatively activated macrophages (M2) (7). M1 macrophages can be induced by Th1 cytokines, including interferon (IFN)-γ and lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which can phagocytose and destroy microbes, kill tumour cells and present antigens to T cells to evoke an adaptive immune response (8,9).

In contrast, M2 macrophages are induced in response to stimulation with IL-4, IL-10, and IL-13. Macrophages of this phenotype upregulate the surface levels of mannose (CD206), scavenger (CD204) and galactose-type receptors involved in debris clearance. Furthermore, M2 macrophages constitutively produce functional cytokines [including transforming growth factor β (TGF-β)] and express the enzyme Arginase 1 (Arg1) (10,11). Through the cytokines and enzyme pathways mentioned aforementioned, M2 macrophages may be involved in the downregulation of inflammation, the promotion of tumour growth, long-term tissue repair and tissue fibrosis. Our previous study also revealed that M2 macrophages contributed to the development of PD-related peritoneal fibrosis in a rat model (12).

However, the differentiation of macrophages in high glucose is not well understood. It is hypothesized that macrophages will polarize to the M2 phenotype in a high glucose environment. To test this hypothesis, the percentage of M1 and M2 macrophages in the 1.5 or 2.5% glucose dialysates of patients with CAPD was detected and the effect of high glucose on the phenotypic polarization of cultured murine macrophages from ascites was investigated. The functions of the cytokine TGF-β1 and the enzyme Arg1 were also detected.

Materials and methods

Subjects

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. Written informed consent was obtained from all participating subjects. A total of 107 patients with CAPD (age, ≥18 years; age range, 22–76 years; mean age, 50.94 years) were recruited from the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between January 2010 and March 2011, including 58 male patients and 49 female patients. The subjects were patients maintained on CAPD without peritonitis, another active infection or evident inflammation.

Sample collection

The night before the study visit, patients were instilled with 2,000 ml of PD solution (1.5% glucose dialysate or 2.5% glucose dialysate) for an overnight dwell (10 h). Effluent samples from patients with CAPD were centrifuged at 1,500 × g for 15 min at 4°C, and the cell sediment was washed twice with PBS. Subsequently, the cell concentration was adjusted to 1×106 cells/ml for flow cytometry. The supernatant of the dialysis effluent was stored at −80°C immediately to detect cytokines by ELISA.

Cell culture

J774A.1 cells, murine macrophages from ascites, were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. Cells were maintained in RPMI-1640 media (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated foetal bovine serum (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 37°C with 5% CO2 in 6-well cell culture plates (3 cm/well) until they formed a confluent monolayer.

Determination of viable cell number

A total of 2×106 cells/ml cells were incubated with 0.2 mg/ml MTT to determine cell viability. Following the MTT incubation, the purple formazan crystals were dissolved using DMSO and viability was assessed at a wavelength of 560 nm using an Infinite F50 R plate reader (Tecan Group, Ltd.).

Flow cytometry

To identify and measure the proportion of peritoneal cell types, markers on peritoneal macrophages from patients with CAPD were measured by triple colour flow cytometry using a FACSort flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc.). Anti-CD14 (clone M5E2; cat. no. 550787; 1:100; BD Biosciences), anti-CCr7 (clone 3D12; cat. no. 552176; 1:50; BD Biosciences) and anti-CD206 (clone 19.2; cat. no. 551135; 1:50; BD Biosciences) antibodies were labelled with PerCP, PE, and FITC, respectively. Class-matched isotype immunoglobulin PerCP, PE and FITC-conjugated negative control monoclonal antibodies were added to individual tubes for all samples to identify nonspecific binding. The broad macrophage gate was refined by plotting side scatter against CD14. In patients with CAPD, CD14- and CCr7-positive cells were considered M1 macrophages, and CD14- and CD206-positive cells were considered M2 macrophages. Murine macrophages (J774A.1 cells) cultured in different concentrations of glucose were considered M1 or M2 cells based on the expression of CCr7 or CD206, respectively. The flow cytometry data were analysing using WinMDI software (version 2.9; The Scripps Research Institute).

ELISA

The cytokine profiles of the dialysates of patients with CAPD were determined using ELISA kits, including IFN-γ (cat. no. BMS228), IL-2 (cat. no. BMS221-2), IL-4 (BMS225-2), and IL-13 (BMS231-3; eBioscience; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The concentrations of cytokines driving M2 in dialysate (including IL-4 and IL-13) could not be detected by ELISA, possibly because the concentration was too low in the dialysis effluent.

Arginase activity

The activity of murine macrophage Arg1 was determined in the aforementioned in vivo experiments using the QuantiChrom Arginase assay kit (cat. no. DARG-200; BioAssay Systems), according to the manufacturer's protocol, which measures the conversion of arginine into urea by arginase. Murine macrophages were lysed for 10 min at 4°C in 500 µl Tris-HCl (10 mM; pH 7.4) containing 1 µM pepstatin A, 1 µM leupeptin, and 0.4% (w/v) Triton X-100. Protein concentration was quantified using the bicinchoninic acid protein assay (Pierce Biotechnology; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), and the protein samples were standardized to the same concentration. Samples (40 µl) were incubated with 10 µl arginine buffer at 37°C for 2 h. Urea detection reagent containing anti-isonitrosopropiophenone was added and incubated at room temperature for 60 min. Subsequently, the optical density (OD) was measured at a wavelength of 430 nm. The readings were standardized to total protein against the OD of the control well of each sample (reaction without the incubation step).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 20.0; IBM Corp.). Data are presented as the mean ± SE. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test was used to analyse normality, and variance analysis was used to test variance equality before analysis by t-test. Comparisons between groups were performed using the independent sample Student's t-test and paired sample Student's t-test. One-way ANOVA followed by the LSD post hoc test was used for multiple groups. The χ2 was used to analyse nominal variables. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Percentage of M1 and M2 macrophages in 1.5 and 2.5% glucose dialysates in an overnight dwell

To evaluate the difference in macrophage phenotypes between patients using 1.5% glucose solution and those using 2.5% glucose solution, the expression of surface markers on macrophages in overnight dialysates of PD patients was examined. In total, 107 CAPD subjects (92 patients using 1.5% glucose and 15 patients using 2.5% glucose) were recruited. Patient characteristics, including age, sex, and biological and haematological data, are listed in Table I. Compared to patients using 1.5% glucose dialysate, patients using 2.5% glucose dialysate exhibited a longer follow-up duration, a higher ratio of diabetes, and lower levels of haemoglobin, haemotocrit, and albumin. However, there were no differences in these clinical characteristics between the two groups (P>0.05).

Table I.

Clinical characteristics of patients using 1.5 and 2.5% glucose dialysates.

Table I.

Clinical characteristics of patients using 1.5 and 2.5% glucose dialysates.

CharacteristicsPatients using 1.5% glucose dialysate (n=92)Patients using 2.5% glucose dialysate (n=15)P-value
Age (years)50.9±14.851.2±12.40.95
Sex (male:female)50:42 (54.3:45.7%)8:7 (53.3:46.7%)0.69
Follow-up duration (months)18.7±22.521.5±24.70.62
Diabetes mellitus17 (20.1%)4 (28.6%)0.83
White blood cell count (109)   7.5±2.5   7.1±2.10.86
Percentage of neutrophils (%)65.8±8.065.2±10.20.52
Haemoglobin (g/l)104.3±19.4101.4±12.30.65
Haemotocrit (%)31.7±5.730.7±4.20.62
Albumin (g/l)38.1±4.835.5±4.30.09
Blood urine nitrogen (mmol/l)18.6±6.719.1±5.40.80
Creatinine (µmol/l)986.9±334.51,039.5±367.80.65

The percentage of M1 macrophages (CD14- and CCr7-positive cells) in the 1.5% glucose solution group and the 2.5% glucose dialysis solution group was 23.0±13.3 and 24.9±12.0%, respectively. The difference between the two groups was not significant. However, the percentage of M2 macrophages (CD14- and CD206-positive cells) in the 1.5% glucose solution group was significantly decreased compared 2.5% glucose solution group (36.2±11.4 vs. 43.2±7.4%, P<0.05) (Fig. 1; the cells in Fig. 1 were gated by CD14 as total macrophages).

Figure 1.

The percentage of M1 and M2 macrophages in 1.5 and 2.5% glucose dialysates of an overnight dwell. M1 and M2 phenotypes were detected by flow cytometry for patients using (A) 1.5% glucose, and (B) 2.5% glucose. (C) Statistical analysis of the percentage of M1 and M2 macrophages were compared between patients using 1.5 and 2.5% glucose dialysates. Each bar represents the mean ± SEM. *P<0.05 vs. M2. GS, glucose.

Determination of the number of viable cells

Four types of culture media were prepared: 5.6 mmol/l glucose was equivalent to the physiological glucose concentration, 83.3 mmol/l glucose was equivalent to 1.5% glucose, 138.8 mmol/l glucose was equivalent to 2.5% glucose, and 235.9 mmol/l glucose was equivalent to 4.25% glucose. A concentration of 5.6 mmol/l glucose was selected as the control concentration because 5.6 mmol/l glucose is the physiological glucose concentration in a healthy body. The latter three glucose concentrations were in accord with the glucose levels in the PD solution.

The growth of murine peritoneal macrophages incubated in 83.3 and 138.8 mmol/l glucose medium for 24 h was inhibited compared to that of macrophages incubated in 5.6 mmol/l glucose medium. Cell death was common when murine peritoneal macrophages were incubated in 235.9 mmol/l glucose medium for 4 h. To investigate the effect of osmotic pressure on the cell growth of murine peritoneal macrophages, these cells were incubated in the same osmotic media with 5.6 mmol/l glucose, 77.7 mmol/l mannitol, 133.2 mmol/l mannitol or 235.9 mmol/l mannitol. The data revealed that cell viability was not decreased at 4, 8 or 12 h (P>0.05). The aforementioned results indicated that osmotic pressure had a weaker effect on the growth of murine peritoneal macrophages within 12 h. Therefore, 5.6, 83.3 and 138.8 mmol/l concentrations were selected to study the differentiation of macrophages (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Growth curve of the J774A.1 cell line. The growth curve of the J774A.1 cell line at various concentrations of (A) glucose and (B) MNT with the same osmotic pressure. OD, optical density; glu, glucose; MNT, mannitol.

Differentiation of M1 and M2 macrophages in a high-glucose environment

J774A.1 cells, a murine macrophage line from ascites, were cultured in 5.6, 83.3 or 138.8 mmol/l glucose medium for 4, 8 or 12 h. The percentage of M1 macrophages (CCr7-positive cells) in 138.8 mmol/l glucose medium increased as time progressed (P<0.05). The percentage of M2 macrophages (CD206-positive cells) increased in a glucose concentration-dependent and time-dependent manner. The differences were significant (P<0.05) (Fig. 3A and B).

Figure 3.

M1 and M2 macrophage detection. (A) Detection of the percentage of M1 and M2 macrophages at various concentrations of glucose at 4, 8 and 12 h using flow cytometry. (B) Statistical analysis of the percentage of M1 and M2 macrophages at various concentrations of glucose at 4, 8 and 12 h. Each bar represents the mean ± SEM. *P<0.05, 138.8 mmol/l vs. 83.3 or 83.3 mmol/l vs. 5.6 mmol/l; #P<0.05, 8 vs. 4 or 12 h vs. 8 h. PE, phycoerythrin; glu, glucose.

Activity of Arg1 in macrophages under different glucose concentrations

To determine the effect of high glucose on functional enzymes in M2 macrophages, arginase activity in murine peritoneal macrophages exposed to different concentrations of glucose were examined. Quantitative colorimetric analysis revealed that the activity of Arg1 in macrophages incubated in different media for 12 h was 0.0008±0.0001 U/l (5.6 mmol/l), 0.1187±0.0287 U/l (83.3 mmol/l) and 0.2301±0.03013 U/l (138.8 mmol/l). The activity increased in a concentration-dependent manner (P<0.05) (Fig. 4).

Figure 4.

Activity of Arg1 in macrophages at various glucose concentrations. Each bar represents the mean ± SEM. *P<0.05, between groups. Arg1, arginase 1.

Level of TGF-β1 in murine macrophages cultured in different glucose concentrations

ELISA revealed that the levels of TGF-β1 in macrophages incubated in different media for 12 h were 32.6±3.1 pg/ml (5.6 mmol/l), 65.47±4.5 pg/ml (83.3 mmol/l) and 83.2±6.3 pg/ml (138.8 mmol/l). The levels also increased in a concentration-dependent manner (P<0.05) (Fig. 5).

Figure 5.

Expression level of TGF-β1 in murine macrophages cultured in various glucose concentrations. Each bar represents the mean ± SEM. *P<0.05 between groups. TGF-β1, transforming growth factor β1.

Discussion

In the present study, it was demonstrated that the percentage of M2 macrophages significantly increased in PD patients using 2.5% glucose dialysate compared with patients using 1.5% glucose dialysate. Moreover, murine peritoneal macrophages were cultured in high glucose, and the percentage of M2 macrophages increased in a glucose concentration-dependent and time-dependent manner. The percentage of M1 macrophages in 138.8 mmol/l glucose medium increased over time. In addition, the activity of Arg1, the functional enzyme of M2 macrophages, in murine macrophages exposed to different concentrations of glucose increased in a concentration-dependent manner. The level of TGF-β1 in the supernatant of murine macrophages also increased in a glucose concentration-dependent manner.

During PD, peritoneal membranes are continuously exposed to PD fluids. However, these solutions have glucose concentrations 10–50-fold higher than physiological concentrations, as well as lactate and an acidic pH (13). PD is limited by chronic fibrotic remodelling of the peritoneal wall after years of therapy (14). Local peritoneal inflammation is the driver of these chronic changes (15). Macrophages are a population of immune cells; they have been identified as key players in the fibrotic cascade and have the capacity to exert either injury-inducing or repair-promoting effects (16,17). Habib et al revealed that a characteristic mononuclear cell infiltrate consisting of CD4-positive T cells and M2 macrophages dominated the peritoneum of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) patients, which indicated that these mononuclear cells participated in the pathogenesis of EPS (18). Another study revealed that when a scavenger of macrophages was used to intervene in an animal model of peritoneal fibrosis, peritoneal thickness, collagen-I, fibronectin and CD206 were downregulated (19). Our previous data revealed that the number and ratio of peritoneal M2 macrophages were significantly increased in peritoneal fibrosis model rats (12,20). In the present study, the results also revealed that the percentage of M2 macrophages was much higher in the effluent of patients using a 2.5% glucose solution than in that of patients using a 1.5% glucose solution. These data indicated that macrophages were polarized to the M2 phenotype in high glucose in vivo.

To mimic the high-glucose microenvironment of peritoneal dialysis in vivo, murine peritoneal macrophages in a high-glucose in vitro environment were cultured. The present research revealed that the percentage of M2 macrophages increased in a glucose concentration-dependent and time-dependent manner, which was in accord with the observations of peritoneal macrophages in PD patients using high-glucose PD solution. The number of M1 and M2 macrophages was markedly decreased after treatment with 5.6 mmol/l glucose at 36 h since cell death was common when macrophages were incubated in glucose-containing medium, especially high-glucose-containing medium, for more than 24 h (21). Pavlou et al cultured bone marrow cells long-term in high-glucose and normal-glucose medium. They revealed that long-term exposure to high glucose increased the expression of M2 macrophage markers (Arg-1 and IL-10) (22). This result is in accordance with our data. The in vitro study and other previous research suggest that high glucose contributes to macrophage polarization to the M2 phenotype, which may be an important step in PD-related fibrosis.

Murine macrophages were cultured in a high-glucose in vitro environment to detect M1 macrophage markers. The present results revealed that the percentage of M1 macrophages in 138.8 mmol/l glucose medium increased over time. Hyperglycaemia has been reported to act directly on monocyte macrophage cell lines by driving the activation of these immunocytes towards an M1 phenotype (a proinflammatory state) (23). Qin et al also revealed that treating Ana-1 macrophages with advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) caused higher mRNA levels and increased production of IL-1β and TNF-α (proinflammatory cytokines) (24). These results suggest that high glucose and AGEs increase the secretion of inflammatory cytokines by macrophages to initiate an inflammatory response. Inflammation is another potential mechanism through which high glucose may damage peritoneal membranes and eventually result in peritoneal fibrosis.

The cytokine environment is the key factor for macrophage differentiation. In the presence of IFN-γ, macrophages may polarize to the M1 phenotype. In the presence of Th2 cytokines, macrophages are alternatively activated towards the M2 phenotype (9). Thus, the levels of Th1 cytokines and Th2 cytokines were detected to observe the microenvironment of the abdominal cavity for macrophage polarization. The present data revealed that cytokines driving the M1 phenotype, including IL-2 and INF-γ, were enhanced in the effluent of patients using 2.5% solution. The difference was not significant. This phenomenon was consistent with the trend of M1 macrophages. However, cytokines driving M2, including IL-4 and IL-13, were undetectable because their concentrations were too low.

Arginase is a marker enzyme of M2 macrophages, and its expression is strictly regulated by exogenous stimulation with IL-4, IL-10, and IL-13 (25). It is important in nitrogen elimination through its hydrolysis of L-arginine to L-ornithine. L-ornithine can be used to generate proline and hydroxyproline, the latter of which is an amino acid essential for the synthesis of collagen. Arg1 also competes with iNOS, an enzyme that controls the production of NO in Th1 cytokine-stimulated M1 macrophages (26). In the present study, it was demonstrated that the activity of arginase in murine macrophages was increased in a concentration-dependent manner when macrophages were exposed to different concentrations of glucose, which indicated that M2 macrophages may promote peritoneal tissue fibrosis through the Arg1 pathway.

M2 activation is provoked in response to stimulation with Th2 cytokines, and functional cytokines (including TGF-β1) are produced (9). Numerous studies have revealed that TGF-β1 is a central mediator in fibrogenic processes and that the activation of the TGF-β1 signalling pathway plays a detrimental role in the pathogenesis of progressive fibrosis (27–29). In the present study, it was demonstrated that the level of TGF-β1 also increased in the supernatant of murine macrophages in a glucose concentration-dependent manner. The present results indicated that the participation of M2 macrophages in PD-related fibrosis was partially resolved by the secretion of the functional cytokine TGF-β1.

Overall, it was demonstrated that high glucose contributed to the polarization of macrophages to the M2 phenotype, which may be involved in the pathogenesis of peritoneal fibrosis induced by PD solutions with high concentrations of glucose. Moreover, M2 macrophage function in PD-related fibrosis may be associated with arginase production and the TGF-β1 signalling pathway. These results also indicated that the blockade of M2 macrophage polarization may be a favorable candidate for therapeutic intervention for PD-related fibrosis, however, the latter will require further studies.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The present study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81700670) and the Medical Research Fund of Guangdong Province (grant no. 20161182070992).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

JL performed the cell experiments and wrote the manuscript. QK collected the tissue samples and analyzed the data. WHa designed the study. WHu designed the study and revised the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. Written informed consent was obtained from all participating subjects.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Wong B, Ravani P, Oliver MJ, Holroyd-Leduc J, Venturato L, Garg AX and Quinn RR: Comparison of patient survival between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis among patients eligible for both modalities. Am J Kidney Dis. 71:344–351. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Cho Y, Badve S, Hawley C, Wiggins K and Johnson D: Biocompatible peritoneal dialysis fluids: Clinical outcomes. Int J Nephrol. 2012:8126092012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Davies S: Unraveling the mechanisms of progressive peritoneal membrane fibrosis. Kidney Int. 89:1185–1187. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Liappas G, González-Mateo GT, Sánchez-Díaz R, Lazcano JJ, Lasarte S, Matesanz-Marín A, Zur R, Ferrantelli E, Ramírez LG, Aguilera A, et al: Immune-regulatory molecule CD69 controls peritoneal fibrosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 27:3561–3576. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Liao CT, Andrews R, Wallace LE, Khan MW, Kift-Morgan A, Topley N, Fraser DJ and Taylor PR: Peritoneal macrophage heterogeneity is associated with different peritoneal dialysis outcomes. Kidney Int. 91:1088–1103. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Locati M, Curtale G and Mantovani A: Diversity, mechanisms, and significance of macrophage plasticity. Annu Rev Pathol. 15:123–147. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Gordon S, Plüddemann A and Martinez Estrada F: Macrophage heterogeneity in tissues: Phenotypic diversity and functions. Immunol Rev. 262:36–55. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Mantovani A, Sica A, Sozzani S, Allavena P, Vecchi A and Locati M: The chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization. Trends Immunol. 25:677–686. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Murray P, Allen J, Biswas S, Fisher E, Gilroy D, Goerdt S, Gordon S, Hamilton J, Ivashkiv L, Lawrence T, et al: Macrophage activation and polarization: Nomenclature and experimental guidelines. Immunity. 41:14–20. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Gordon S and Martinez F: Alternative activation of macrophages: Mechanism and functions. Immunity. 32:593–604. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Xue J, Sharma V, Hsieh M, Chawla A, Murali R, Pandol S and Habtezion A: Alternatively activated macrophages promote pancreatic fibrosis in chronic pancreatitis. Nat Commun. 6:71582015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Hu W, Jiang Z, Zhang Y, Liu Q, Fan J, Luo N, Dong X and Yu X: Characterization of infiltrating macrophages in high glucose-induced peritoneal fibrosis in rats. Mol Med Rep. 6:93–99. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

13 

Bartosova M, Schaefer B, Vondrak K, Sallay P, Taylan C, Cerkauskiene R, Dzierzega M, Milosevski-Lomic G, Büscher R, Zaloszyc A, et al: Peritoneal dialysis vintage and glucose exposure but not peritonitis episodes drive peritoneal membrane transformation during the first years of PD. Front Physiol. 10:3562019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Mehrotra R, Devuyst O, Davies S and Johnson D: The current state of peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 27:3238–3252. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Helmke A, Nordlohne J, Balzer MS, Dong L, Rong S, Hiss M, Shushakova N, Haller H and von Vietinghoff S: CX3CL1-CX3CR1 interaction mediates macrophage-mesothelial cross talk and promotes peritoneal fibrosis. Kidney Int. 95:1405–1417. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Pellicoro A, Ramachandran P, Iredale J and Fallowfield J: Liver fibrosis and repair: Immune regulation of wound healing in a solid organ. Nat Rev Immunol. 14:181–194. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Palomar R, López-Hoyos M, Morales P, Marín MJ, Alvarez L, Ruiz-Soto M, Rodrigo E, Fernandez-Fresnedo G, Lm de Francisco A and Arias M: Analysis of peritoneal leukocyte population with different dialysis fluids. Clin Nephrol. 72:137–142. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Habib SM, Abrahams AC, Korte MR, Zietse R, de Vogel LL, Boer WH, Dendooven A, Clahsen-van Groningen MC and Betjes MG: CD4-positive T Cells and M2 macrophages dominate the peritoneal infiltrate of patients with encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis. PLoS One. 10:e01201742015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Kushiyama T, Oda T, Yamada M, Higashi K, Yamamoto K, Oshima N, Sakurai Y, Miura S and Kumagai H: Effects of liposome-encapsulated clodronate on chlorhexidine gluconate-induced peritoneal fibrosis in rats. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 26:3143–3154. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Wang J, Jiang ZP, Su N, Fan JJ, Ruan YP, Peng WX, Li YF and Yu XQ: The role of peritoneal alternatively activated macrophages in the process of peritoneal fibrosis related to peritoneal dialysis. Int J Mol Sci. 14:10369–10382. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Shang Y, Fang N, Wang F, Wang H, Wang Z, Tang M, Peng J, Zhang Y, Zhang W and Zhong M: MicroRNA-21, induced by high glucose, modulates macrophage apoptosis via programmed cell death 4. Mol Med Rep. 12:463–469. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Pavlou S, Lindsay J, Ingram R, Xu H and Chen M: Sustained high glucose exposure sensitizes macrophage responses to cytokine stimuli but reduces their phagocytic activity. BMC Immunol. 19:242018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Pan Y, Wang Y, Cai L, Cai Y, Hu J, Yu C, Li J, Feng Z, Yang S, Li X and Liang G: Inhibition of high glucose-induced inflammatory response and macrophage infiltration by a novel curcumin derivative prevents renal injury in diabetic rats. Br J Pharmacol. 166:1169–1182. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Qin Q, Niu J, Wang Z, Xu W, Qiao Z and Gu Y: Astragalus membranaceus inhibits inflammation via phospho-P38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and nuclear factor (NF)-κB pathways in advanced glycation end product-stimulated macrophages. Int J Mol Sci. 13:8379–8387. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Pauleau AL, Rutschman R, Lang R, Pernis A, Watowich S and Murray P: Enhancer-mediated control of macrophage-specific arginase I expression. J Immunol. 172:7565–7573. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Gotoh T, Sonoki T, Nagasaki A, Terada K, Takiguchi M and Mori M: Molecular cloning of cDNA for nonhepatic mitochondrial arginase (arginase II) and comparison of its induction with nitric oxide synthase in a murine macrophage-like cell line. FEBS Lett. 395:119–122. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Strippoli R, Moreno-Vicente R, Battistelli C, Cicchini C, Noce V, Amicone L, Marchetti A, Del Pozo M and Tripodi M: Molecular mechanisms underlying peritoneal EMT and fibrosis. Stem Cells Int. 2016:35436782016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Zhou Q, Bajo MA, Del Peso G, Yu X and Selgas R: Preventing peritoneal membrane fibrosis in peritoneal dialysis patients. Kidney Int. 90:515–524. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Kariya T, Nishimura H, Mizuno M, Suzuki Y, Matsukawa Y, Sakata F, Maruyama S, Takei Y and Ito Y: TGF-β1-VEGF-A pathway induces neoangiogenesis with peritoneal fibrosis in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 314:F167–F180. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

  • Abstract
  • View
  • Download
  • Twitter
Copy and paste a formatted citation
Spandidos Publications style
Lin J, Kong Q, Hao W and Hu W: High glucose contributes to the polarization of peritoneal macrophages to the M2 phenotype in vivo and in vitro. Mol Med Rep 22: 127-134, 2020.
APA
Lin, J., Kong, Q., Hao, W., & Hu, W. (2020). High glucose contributes to the polarization of peritoneal macrophages to the M2 phenotype in vivo and in vitro. Molecular Medicine Reports, 22, 127-134. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2020.11130
MLA
Lin, J., Kong, Q., Hao, W., Hu, W."High glucose contributes to the polarization of peritoneal macrophages to the M2 phenotype in vivo and in vitro". Molecular Medicine Reports 22.1 (2020): 127-134.
Chicago
Lin, J., Kong, Q., Hao, W., Hu, W."High glucose contributes to the polarization of peritoneal macrophages to the M2 phenotype in vivo and in vitro". Molecular Medicine Reports 22, no. 1 (2020): 127-134. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2020.11130
Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Lin J, Kong Q, Hao W and Hu W: High glucose contributes to the polarization of peritoneal macrophages to the M2 phenotype in vivo and in vitro. Mol Med Rep 22: 127-134, 2020.
APA
Lin, J., Kong, Q., Hao, W., & Hu, W. (2020). High glucose contributes to the polarization of peritoneal macrophages to the M2 phenotype in vivo and in vitro. Molecular Medicine Reports, 22, 127-134. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2020.11130
MLA
Lin, J., Kong, Q., Hao, W., Hu, W."High glucose contributes to the polarization of peritoneal macrophages to the M2 phenotype in vivo and in vitro". Molecular Medicine Reports 22.1 (2020): 127-134.
Chicago
Lin, J., Kong, Q., Hao, W., Hu, W."High glucose contributes to the polarization of peritoneal macrophages to the M2 phenotype in vivo and in vitro". Molecular Medicine Reports 22, no. 1 (2020): 127-134. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2020.11130
Follow us
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
About
  • Spandidos Publications
  • Careers
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
How can we help?
  • Help
  • Live Chat
  • Contact
  • Email to our Support Team