Open Access

miR‑217‑5p regulates myogenesis in skeletal muscle stem cells by targeting FGFR2

  • Authors:
    • Menghai Zhu
    • Gang Chen
    • Yi Yang
    • Jiantao Yang
    • Bengang Qin
    • Liqiang Gu
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: May 7, 2020     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2020.11133
  • Pages: 850-858
  • Copyright: © Zhu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

MicroRNA-217-5p (miR-217-5p) has been implicated in cell proliferation; however, its role in skeletal muscle stem cells (SkMSCs) remains unknown. The present study aimed to explore the roles of miR‑217‑5p in the biological characteristics of SkMSCs. SkMSCs were identified by cell surface markers using flow cytometry. The present study observed that miR‑217‑5p mimics accelerated the proliferation and suppressed the differentiation in SkMSCs. In addition, the results of the present study revealed that fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) was a target of miR‑217‑5p, as miR‑217‑5p bound directly to the 3'‑untranslated region of FGFR2 mRNA, resulting in increased FGFR2 mRNA and protein levels. In addition, the present study suppressed the expression of FGFR2 in SkMSCs using a selective FGFR inhibitor AZD4547 and detected the efficiency of inhibition by reverse transcription‑quantitative PCR and western blotting. miR‑217‑5p levels were positively associated with FGFR2 expression, which was upregulated and accelerated the proliferation of SkMSCs compared with that of the miR‑NC group. Collectively, these results demonstrated that miR‑217‑5p may act as a myogenesis promoter in SkMSCs by directly targeting FGFR2 and may regulate the myogenesis of these cells.

Introduction

Skeletal muscle stem cells (SkMSCs) are capable of self-renewal and muscle regeneration (1). Lineage progression directs quiescent stem cells toward activation, proliferation and differentiation due to muscle injury or pathological conditions through the activation of multiple mitogenic factors (24). Previous studies have suggested that key transcription factors serve a significant role in the proliferation and differentiation of SkMSCs (4,5). Progenitors expressing paired box (Pax) proteins 3/7 are prerequisite factors for skeletal muscle growth and are regarded as the source of adult SkMSCs (57). A number of studies have suggested that the expression of Pax7 is important for the maintenance of adult SkMSCs, and that the activation of the myogenic differentiation markers (MyoD) gene primes myogenesis (6,8,9).

Accumulating evidence suggests that a number of microRNAs (miRNAs), such as miR-99a-5p (10), miR-9-5p (11), miR-208b (12), serve important roles in skeletal muscle myogenesis by regulating gene expression, and that their abnormal expression is associated with a number of muscle diseases including, muscle atrophy and ischemic injury (6,13,14). Regarding the molecular mechanism of miRNAs in myogenesis, studies have reported a role for these molecules in the differentiation of SkMSCs (13,15). Indeed, substantial evidence supports the hypothesis that miRNAs are involved in regulating muscle regeneration. A recent study has reported that miR-483-3p is involved in the osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) by targeting STAT1 and may serve as a potential therapeutic target for bone loss due to aging (16). In addition, studies have revealed that miR-7 regulates the neural differentiation of trabecular meshwork mesenchymal stem cells (TMMSCs), and that the poly (L-lactate) (PLLA)/poly (e-caprolactone) (PCL) scaffold, termed a three-dimensional (3D) culture system, can promote their differentiation towards glial and neural progenitor cells (14). Previous studies have reported that miRNA-217-5p regulates pluripotent stem cell proliferation and differentiation (17) and is involved in metabolic processes in various cells, such as endothelial (18) and colorectal cancer (19) cells. These findings provide insights into the application of miRNAs in regenerative and cell therapy for muscle diseases (14). However, a limited number of studies have explored the potential roles of miR-217-5p in SkMSCs.

Previous studies have reported that fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) exerts an important role in embryogenesis and tissue regeneration, especially in bone and vascular development (20,21). FGFR2 overexpression serves a crucial role in the myogenesis of SkMSCs (22). Consistent with these findings, owing to its association with the myogenesis of SkMSCs, FGFR2 is considered a therapeutic target for muscle injury (23,24). However, its role in the proliferation of SkMSCs remains unclear. This present study aimed to investigate whether miR-217-5p may mediate the expression of FGFR2 in SkMSCs.

Materials and methods

Animals and cell culture

Isolated single myofiber-associated cells were prepared using limb muscles obtained from 2-week-old female Sprague Dawley rats (n=5; 30–500 g) maintained in a 12:12 h light/dark cycle at 23°C and 50–70% humidity, which were anesthetized with 50 mg/kg 1% sodium pentobarbital and euthanized by cervical dislocation prior to the removal of the limb muscles. Animal experiments were approved by The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, China). All animals were purchased from The Guangdong Medical Laboratory Animal Center (Guangzhou, China). Rat tibialis muscles were subjected to enzymatic dissociation (0.2% collagenase, Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) at 37°C for 90 min. The cell suspension was filtered through a 40-µm filter (Biosharp Life Sciences). Following isolation, myofiber-associated cells were stained for the isolation of particular cell populations by flow cytometry and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). After sorting, cells were cultured in DMEM (HyClone; GE Healthcare life Sciences) supplemented with 20% FBS (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and 1% chick embryo extract (Gemini Bio Products). Myogenic differentiation was induced using DMEM with 2% heat-inactivated horse serum (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The NC group cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and the PG group cells were incubated in DMEM supplemented with 20% FBS, 1% chick embryo extract and transforming growth factor (TGF)β1. The cells were maintained in an incubator with a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2 at 37°C.

RNA isolation and reverse transcription-quantitative (RT-q) PCR amplification

RT-qPCR was performed as described previously (25). Briefly, total RNA was extracted using TRIzol® reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and was reverse transcribed by SuperScript® cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, an RT mixture containing 1 µl total RNA, 4 µl deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 2 µl Primer Max, 4 µl RT bufer, 1 µl SuperRT and diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC)-treated water to a final volume of 20 µl were subjected to 37°C for 1 h, 95°C for 5 min and 4°C for cooling for 30 min. The primers used were as follows: miR-217-5p forward, 5′-CGCGGATCCTATTGTATTACGGTAGGATG-3′ and reverse, 5′-CCGCTCGAGCAGATAGCACGAACTTTT-3′; FGFR2 forward, 5′-GCGTCTCCAACGCCAAAGAGTCTTTCGTATATTATCAAAAT-3′ and reverse, 5′-CAGTGAATTTTGATAATATACGAAAGACTCTTTGGCGTTG-3′; Pax 7 forward, 5′-AGCCGAGTGCTCAGAATCAA-3′ and reverse, 5′-TCCTCTCGAAAGCCTTCTCC-3′; MyoD forward, 5′-CGACTGCCTGTCCAGCATAG-3′ and reverse, 5′-GGACACTGAGGGGTGGAGTC-3′; myosin heavy chain (MyHC) forward, 5′-TGCCAAGACCGTGAGGAATG-3′ and reverse, 5′-AATGCATCACAGCTCCCGTG-3′; and GAPDH forward, 5′-GGGTGATGCTGGTGCTGAGTATGT-3′ and reverse, 5′-AAGAATGGGAGTTGCTGTTGAAGTC-3′. Thermal cycling conditions were 2 min at 95°C followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 15 sec on a Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.), GAPDH was used as an internal control to normalize target gene transcripts. Each sample was measured at least three times and the 2−ΔΔCq method (26) was used to assess relative levels of the mRNAs of the target genes.

Target gene prediction

TargetScan (version 7.2l www.targetscan.org,) and miRNA.org (version 22.1; http://www.microrna.org) were used for scanning the candidate targets of miR-217-5p. Basic information of miR-217-5p was submitted online and the potential targets of miR-217-5p were presented.

Luciferase reporter assay

The miR-217-5p mimics (5′-UACUGCAUCAGGAACUGAUUGGC-3′), miR-217-5p antagomir (5′-GCCAAUCAGUUCCUGAUGCAGUA-3′) NC-mimics (5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3′; 5′-ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAATT-3′) and NC-antagomir (5′-CAGUACUUUUGUGUAGUACAA-3′) were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. The amplified miR-192-5p mimic sequence and miR-NC were transfected into the SkMSCs using Lipofectamine® 2000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

To identify the binding sequences and uniform resource locator, luciferase reporter assay was used. The miR-217-5p mimics, miR-NC, or miR-217-5p antagomir and the pRL-TK vector (Promega Corporation) carrying the mutant (mut) or wild-type (wt) FGFR2 3′ untranslated region (3′-UTR) were co-transfected into SkMSCs using Lipofectamine® 2000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Three days later, cells were lysed with the Dual-Glo® Reagent (Promega Corporation), and luciferase activity was measured using a Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega Corporation). The firefly luciferase activity was normalized to Renilla luciferase activity.

Western blot analysis

Protein was extracted using RIPA buffer with protease inhibitor (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA), protein concentration was determined by bicinchoninic assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), and denatured for 5 min at 100°C prior to electrophoresis using an 8–10% polyacrylamide gel and a mid-range protein ladder (Beijing CoWin Biotech Co., Ltd.). Then, proteins were transferred to a PVDF membrane (EMD Millipore), blocked with 2% goat serum (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) for 1 h at room temperature, and incubated with rabbit anti-FGFR2 (1:1,000; cat. no. ab10648; Abcam), GAPDH (1:1,000; EPR1689; cat. no. ab181602; Abcam), Pax7 (1:100; cat. no. ab199010; Abcam), MyoD (1:250; cat. no. ab203383; Abcam) and MHC (1:200; cat. no. ab11083; Abcam) primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. Membranes were then washed using TBST + 0.5% Tween-20 (EMD Millipore) and incubated with Alexa Fluor® 790-conjugated polyclonal goat anti-rabbit IgG H&L (1:10,000; cat. no. ab175781; Abcam) secondary antibody at room temperature for 1 h. Images were acquired by scanning with LI-COR's Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR Biotechnology).

MTT assay

MTT assay was performed to evaluate the rate of proliferation of SkMSCs. Following transfection with miR-217-5p mimics, miR-217-5p antagomir and miR-NC, cells were seeded into 96-well plates (2×104 cells/well) and incubated at 37°C for ~24 h. Then, 20 µl 5 mg/ml MTT solution was added into each well, and the plates were incubated at 37°C for an additional 4 h. After removing the medium, DMSO (160 µl/well) was added to each well. The concentration of MTT formazan solubilized with PBS was measured by a microplate reader (Tecan Group, Ltd.) at 490 nm according to the manufacturer's instructions.

FACS

Flow cytometry analysis and cell sorting were performed at the central laboratory of The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, China). Markers for CD45 [BV510 mouse anti-rat CD45 Clone OX-1 (RUO); BD Pharmingen], CD11b (rat CD11B APC WT.5; BD Pharmingen), anti-integrinβ1 [anti-integrin β1 (HMb1-1; PE/Cy7); cat. no. ab95622; Abcam] and CD34 [anti-CD34 antibody (EP373Y); cat. no. ab81289; Abcam] were used. The trypsinized cells were filtered using 200-mesh sieves and incubated with the above antibodies at 4°C for 1 h. Then, the cells were washed twice with PBS and resuspended in 200 ml PBS prior to analysis using a BD Accuri C6 flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and flow cytometric data was analyzed using FlowJo software (version 7.6; Tree Star, Inc) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Cell proliferation assay

To verify the proliferation of SkMSCs, a 5-Ethynyl-2′deoxyuridine (EdU) Kit (Guangzhou RiboBio Co., Ltd.) was used. SkMSCs were seeded at a density of 5×105 cells/well in 6-well plates coated with decellularized skeletal muscle extracellular matrix hydrogels (Shanghai Linbo Scientific Instruments Co., Ltd.) and cultured in the appropriate growth medium for 24 h at 37°C for the following four groups: Negative control (NC), miR217-5p, 2 µM AZD4547 and 2 µM miR217-5p + AZD4547. The cells were treated with 10 µM EdU working solution growth medium for 2 h in the dark. Then, the cells were treated with PBS containing 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at room temperature, followed by 2 mg/ml glycine and 0.5% Triton X-100 for 15 min at room temperature. After Hoechst 33342 was added to each well, cells were incubated for 30–40 min in the dark. Images were acquired at ×40 magnification using an Axiovison 4.8 camera attached to an Axio Observer Z1 inverted microscope (Carl Zeiss, Inc.). Five image fields were randomly captured for each sample.

Immunofluorescence staining and microscopy. Immunofluorescence was performed as previously described (27). Samples were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 1 h at room temperature and then blocked with 2% goat serum (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) for 1 h at room temperature. DAPI (cat. no. ab228549, Abcam) was used to identify the nuclei. The cells were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C and were as follows: Pax7 (1:100, cat. no. ab199010, Abcam), MyoD (1:250, cat. no. ab203383, Abcam) and MHC (1:200, cat. no. ab11083, Abcam). Then the cells were incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature and were as follows: Alexa Fluor® 594-conjugated goat anti-mouse (1:1,000, cat. no. ab150116, Abcam) and Alexa Fluor® 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG H&L (1:1,000, cat. no. ab150077, Abcam). Cell images were acquired using an Axiovison 4.8 camera (magnification, ×40) attached to an Axio Observer Z1 inverted microscope (Carl Zeiss, Inc.) and the images were then assembled using Adobe® Photoshop CS 6 software (Adobe Systems, Inc.).

Confocal microscopy

Cells (1×104 cells/well) were seeded on confocal dishes and maintained in an incubator for 24 h at 37°C. The procedures were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Cells were incubated overnight at 4°C with anti- Pax7 (1:200; cat. no. ab199010; Abcam) and MyoD (1:200; cat. no. ab203383; Abcam) primary antibodies, and then incubated with Alexa Fluor® 594-conjugated goat anti-mouse (1:1,000; cat. no. ab150116; Abcam) and Alexa Fluor® 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG H&L (1:1,000; cat. no. ab150077; Abcam) secondary antibodies for 1 h in the dark at room temperature. Then, DAPI was added for 15 min at room temperature. Finally, a confocal microscope (Nikon Corporation) was used to acquire images at ×40 magnification.

Statistical analysis

Each experiment was repeated at least three times and the data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance was determined by performing Student's t-test for comparisons between two groups and one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's post-hoc test for comparisons between more than two groups. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Isolation and identification of SkMSCs

FACS analysis results demonstrated SkMSCs to be positive for CD34 and integrin β1 and negative for CD11b and CD45 (Fig. 1A). Cell colonies were observed 3–5 days after the initial plating, and light microscopy demonstrated the SkMSCs exhibited a fibroblast-like morphology.

To identify the characteristics of SkMSCs, the expression of Pax7 and MyoD was examined. The majority of adhered SkMSCs exhibited expression of Pax7 and MyoD (Fig. 1B). In addition, the PG group exhibited a greater number of EdU-positive stained cells compared with that in the NC group (Fig. 1C and D), suggesting a high capacity for proliferation.

SkMSCs exhibiting an accelerated rate of proliferation express high levels of miR-217-5p

miR-217-5p levels were measured in the medium samples from PG and NC SkMSCs. RT-qPCR analysis demonstrated that the expression of miR-217-5p was significantly higher in PG SkMSCs compared with that in NC SkMSCs (Fig. 2A). In addition, the FGFR2 mRNA and protein expression was significantly upregulated in PG SkMSCs compared with that in NC SkMSCs (Fig. 2B-D). These results suggested that miR-217-5p and FGFR2 expression was greater in highly proliferating SkMSCs compared with normal SkMSCs.

Ectopic expression of miR-217-5p affects SkMSC proliferation and differentiation

miR-217-5p expression was modulated by transfecting a miR-217-5p antagomir or miR-217-5p mimics into SkMSCs. MTT assay demonstrated that the proliferation of SkMSCs was promoted by miR-217-5p mimics and impeded by miR-217-5p antagomir compared with that of the miR-NC group (Fig. 3A). RT-qPCR analysis was also performed to verify miR-217-5p expression; miR-217-5p mimics significantly increased, whereas miR-217-5p antagomir significantly decreased the expression levels of miR-217-5p in SkMSCs compared with that of SkMSCs transfected with miR-NC (Fig. 3B). In addition, immunofluorescence staining demonstrated that the expression levels of MyoD and MYHC were significantly lower in the miR-217-5p mimic group and significantly higher in the miR-217-5p antagomir group compared with those of the miR-NC group (Fig. 3C-E). These data suggested that miR-217-5p enhanced the proliferation and inhibited the differentiation of SkMSCs.

FGFR2 is a direct target of miR-217-5p in SkMSCs

TargetScan and miRNA databases were used to predict the downstream targets of miR-217-5p and further explore the underlying molecular mechanism involved in the proliferation of SkMSCs. As binding between the 3′-UTR of FGFR2 and miR-217-5p was predicted (Fig. 4A), luciferase reporter assay was performed to investigate whether FGFR2 was directly targeted by miR-217-5p. Transfection of SkMSCs with miR-217-5p mimics significantly decreased the luciferase activity of the wild-type, but not the mutant, 3′-UTR of FGFR2 compared to that of SkMSCs transfected with miR-NC (Fig. 4B). By contrast, the miR-217-5p antagomir significantly increased the luciferase activity of wild-type FGFR2 in SkMSCs compared with that of SkMSCs transfected with miR-NC and miR-217-5p mimics (Fig. 4B). In addition, the results also demonstrated that miR-217-5p mimics significantly increased and miR-217-5p antagomir significantly decreased the mRNA and protein expression levels of FGFR2 in SkMSCs compared with those of miR-NC transfected SkMSCs (Fig. 4C-E). These findings suggested that FGFR2 was a direct target of miR-217-5p in SkMSCs.

miR-217-5p regulates the proliferation and differentiation of SkMSCs by targeting FGFR2

To verify the mechanism of miR-217-5p in myogenesis, SkMSCs were transfected with miR-217-5p mimics or miR-NC. RT-qPCR results demonstrated that FGFR2 mRNA expression was increased in SkMSCs transfected with miR-217-5p mimics compared with that in SkMSCs transfected with miR-NC (Fig. 5A). In addition, RT-qPCR and western blotting results demonstrated that a selective FGFR inhibitor (AZD4547) suppressed the mRNA and protein expression of FGFR2 compared with that in the miR-NC group, whereas miR-217-5p overexpression (miR-217-5p mimics + AZD4547) reduced this suppression (Fig. 5A-C). Additionally, MTT assay demonstrated that the proliferation of SkMSCs was suppressed by AZD4547 compared with miR-NC, and that miR-217-5p mimics + AZD4547 reduced the reversal (Fig. 5D). Furthermore, to study the role of miR-192-5p in differentiation of SkMSCs, the expression of MYHC and MyoD was examined. Western blotting analysis demonstrated that the protein expression levels of MYHC and MyoD was suppressed by miR-217-5p mimics but enhanced by AZD4547 compared with those in the miR-NC group (Fig. 5E and F). These results suggested that miR-217-5p may regulate the myogenesis of SkMSCs by targeting FGFR2.

Discussion

The regenerative capacity of adult skeletal muscle is attributed to SkMSCs. Which have the ability to proliferate, differentiate and self-renew (1,7). SkMSCs are involved in muscle formation and regeneration in response to acute or chronic injury (7,28). The results of the present study demonstrated that the expression levels of miR-217-5p were increased in SkMSC culture medium and that miR-217-5p mimics promoted the proliferation and suppressed the differentiation of SkMSCs. In addition, miR-217-5p may have the potential to facilitate the proliferation of SkMSCs possibly by targeting FGFR2.

A miRNA is a type of small noncoding RNA 20–30 nucleotides in length that regulates gene expression through the inhibition of translation or promotion of the degradation of target mRNA by binding to its 3′-UTR (17,19,2932). Recent studies have reported that the prerequisite for the myogenic differentiation of quiescent SkMSCs is the activation of myogenic markers and MyoD expression (7,3335). Previous studies have reported that miRNAs are involved in regeneration and differentiation of SkMSCs (3639). Increasing evidence indicates that several miRNAs promote or inhibit stem cell progression (19). miR-217-5p has been implicated in the apoptosis of colorectal cancer cells by directly targeting protein kinase c iota type I (PRKCI), BAG family molecular chaperone regulator 3 (BAG3), integrin subunit alpha v (ITGAV) and mitogen-activated protein kinase 1 (MAPK1) (19). Further studies have revealed that miR-217-5p regulates pluripotent stem cell proliferation and differentiation by LPS (1719). However, the role of miR-217-5p in SkMSCs is still unclear. The present study explored the effects of miR217-5p on the proliferation of SkMSCs. The results of the present study demonstrated that the expression levels of miR-217-5p were increased in SkMSC culture medium and promoted SkMSCs proliferation compared with that of the miR-NC group.

FGFR2 is associated with breast, lung and clear cell renal cell carcinomas (4042). In addition, FGFR2 has recently been identified as a therapeutic target for carcinoma owing to its association with tumorigenesis (4345). Studies have reported that FGFR2 promotes the proliferation of stem cells (46,47) and that a novel circular RNA of FGFR2 may serve a role in enhancing skeletal muscle proliferation and differentiation by targeting miR-133a-5p and miR-29b-1-5p (6). A recent study has revealed that miR-142-3p suppresses the induction of the FGFR2-driven oncogenic process by directly binding transient receptor potential ankyrin-1 (TRPA1) (20).

The results of the present study suggested that miR-217-5p may directly target FGFR2 and enhance the expression of FGFR2, indicating a positive regulatory effect of miR-217-5p on this target gene. Although miRNAs have a predominantly negative effect on the expression of the protein encoded by the target gene, several reports have demonstrated a positive effect of miRNAs (4851). Similarly, the results of the present study suggested that miR-217-5p promoted the target gene expression.

In the present study, TargetScan and miRNA databases were used to predict the downstream targets of miR-217-5p and further explore the molecular mechanism underlying the proliferation and differentiation of SkMSCs. SkMSCs have self-renewal properties and can regenerate muscle (28). However, a previous study has suggested that the SkMSC population contains undifferentiated cells that can differentiate into several other types of mesenchymal cells, such as adipocytes, chondrocytes and osteocytes (52). SkMSCs can be activated during muscle repair; however, they also have the potential to differentiate into other phenotypes. The results of the present study demonstrated that miR-217-5p mimics induced the upregulation of FGFR2, promoting myogenesis of SkMSCs.

There were several limitations to the present study. First, only one cell type was used in the present study, and additional cell types may be required. Second, although the present study indicated that miR-217-5p levels were increased in SkMSC culture medium, which promoted SkMSCs proliferation by targeting FGFR2, the underlying mechanism remained unclear. Third, the results of this study were not validated in vivo, necessitating further exploration of the role of miR-217-5p in SkMSCs. Further study to analyze the mechanism of skeletal muscle regeneration is necessary.

In summary, the results of the present study suggested that miR-217-5p maintains an appropriate proliferation rate and suppresses differentiation into a non-muscle cell phenotype, thus regulating the myogenesis of SkMSCs by targeting FGFR2, which may reflect a promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment of muscle injuries.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by The National Natural Science Foundation Item (grant nos. 81871787 and 81601057) and The Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (grant nos. 2018A030310254 and 2015A030310350).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

MZ and YY carried out experiments, data analysis and wrote the manuscript. BQ and GC performed experiments and helped with data quantifications. LG and JY designed the project and supervised the experiment. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Animal care was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (approval no. SYSU-IACUC-2020-000052).

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Glossary

Abbreviations

Abbreviations:

MyHC

myosin heavy chain

MyoD

myogenic differentiation markers

Pax7

paired box protein7

SkMSCs

skeletal muscle stem cells

TGFβ1

transforming growth factor-β1

EdU

5-Ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine

FACS

fluorescence-activated cell sorting

UTR

untranslated region

References

1 

De Micheli AJ, Laurilliard EJ, Heinke CL, Ravichandran H, Fraczek P, Soueid-Baumgarten S, De Vlaminck I, Elemento O and Cosgrove BD: Single-cell analysis of the muscle stem cell hierarchy identifies heterotypic communication signals involved in skeletal muscle regeneration. Cell reports. 30:3583–3595.e5. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Sacco A, Doyonnas R, Kraft P, Vitorovic S and Blau HM: Self-renewal and expansion of single transplanted muscle stem cells. Nature. 456:502–506. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Sheehan SM and Allen RE: Skeletal muscle satellite cell proliferation in response to members of the fibroblast growth factor family and hepatocyte growth factor. J Cell Physiol. 181:499–506. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Cerletti M, Jurga S, Witczak CA, Hirshman MF, Shadrach JL, Goodyear LJ and Wagers AJ: Highly efficient, functional engraftment of skeletal muscle stem cells in dystrophic muscles. Cell. 134:37–47. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Madaro L, Torcinaro A, De Bardi M, Contino FF, Pelizzola M, Diaferia GR, Imeneo G, Bouchè M, Puri PL and De Santa F: Macrophages fine tune satellite cell fate in dystrophic skeletal muscle of mdx mice. PLoS Genet. 15:e10084082019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Chen X, Ouyang H, Wang Z, Chen B and Nie Q: A novel circular RNA generated by FGFR2 gene promotes myoblast proliferation and differentiation by sponging miR-133a-5p and miR-29b-1-5p. Cells. 7:E1992018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Fukuda S, Kaneshige A, Kaji T, Noguchi YT, Takemoto Y, Zhang L, Tsujikawa K, Kokubo H, Uezumi A, Maehara K, et al: Sustained expression of HeyL is critical for the proliferation of muscle stem cells in overloaded muscle. Elife. 8:e482842019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Tanaka KK, Hall JK, Troy AA, Cornelison DD, Majka SM and Olwin BB: Syndecan-4-expressing muscle progenitor cells in the SP engraft as satellite cells during muscle regeneration. Cell Stem Cell. 4:217–225. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Kumar P, Ciftci S, Barthes J, Knopf-Marques H, Muller CB, Debry C, Vrana NE and Ghaemmaghami AM: A composite Gelatin/hyaluronic acid hydrogel as an ECM mimic for developing mesenchymal stem cell derived epithelial tissue patches. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 14:45–57. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Cao X, Tang S, Du F, Li H, Shen X, Li D, Wang Y, Zhang Z, Xia L, Zhu Q and Yin H: miR-99a-5p regulates the proliferation and differentiation of skeletal muscle satellite cells by targeting MTMR3 in chicken. Genes (Basel). 11:E3692020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Yin H, He H, Shen X, Zhao J, Cao X, Han S, Cui C, Chen Y, Wei Y, Xia L, et al: miR-9-5p inhibits skeletal muscle satellite cell proliferation and differentiation by targeting IGF2BP3 through the IGF2-PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Int J Mol Sci. 21:E16552020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Fu L, Wang H, Liao Y, Zhou P, Xu Y, Zhao Y, Xie S, Zhao S and Li X: miR-208b modulating skeletal muscle development and energy homoeostasis through targeting distinct targets. RNA Biol. 17:743–754. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Guan X, Gao Y, Zhou J, Wang J, Zheng F, Guo F, Chang A, Li X and Wang B: miR-223 regulates adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells through a C/EBPs/miR-223/FGFR2 regulatory feedback loop. Stem Cells. 33:1589–1600. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Jedari B, Rahmani A, Naderi M and Nadri S: MicroRNA-7 promotes neural differentiation of trabecular meshwork mesenchymal stem cell on nanofibrous scaffold. J Cell Biochem. 121:2818–2827. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Phelps M, Stuelsatz P and Yablonka-Reuveni Z: Expression profile and overexpression outcome indicate a role for βKlotho in skeletal muscle fibro/adipogenesis. FEBS J. 283:1653–1668. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Xiao Y, Guo Q, Jiang TJ, Yuan Y, Yang L, Wang GW and Xiao WF: miR4833p regulates osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells by targeting STAT1. Mol Med Rep. 20:4558–4566. 2019.PubMed/NCBI

17 

Zeng ZL, Lin XL, Tan LL, Liu YM, Qu K and Wang Z: MicroRNAs: Important regulators of induced pluripotent stem cell generation and differentiation. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 14:71–81. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Zhang X, Wang Z, Li W, Huang R, Zheng D and Bi G: MicroRNA-217-5p ameliorates endothelial cell apoptosis induced by ox-LDL by targeting CLIC4. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 30:523–533. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Flum M, Kleemann M, Schneider H, Weis B, Fischer S, Handrick R and Otte K: miR-217-5p induces apoptosis by directly targeting PRKCI, BAG3, ITGAV and MAPK1 in colorectal cancer cells. J Cell Commun Signal. 12:451–466. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Berrout J, Kyriakopoulou E, Moparthi L, Hogea AS, Berrout L, Ivan C, Lorger M, Boyle J, Peers C, Muench S, et al: TRPA1-FGFR2 binding event is a regulatory oncogenic driver modulated by miRNA-142-3p. Nat Commun. 8:9472017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Li X, Nie C, Tian B, Tan X, Han W, Wang J, Jin Y, Li Y, Guan X, Hong A and Chen X: miR-671-5p blocks the progression of human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by suppressing FGFR2. Int J Biol Sci. 15:1892–1904. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Nakano S, Nakamura K, Teramoto N, Yamanouchi K and Nishihara M: Basic fibroblast growth factor is pro-adipogenic in rat skeletal muscle progenitor clone, 2G11 cells. Anim Sci J. 87:99–108. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Du YE, Tu G, Yang G, Li G, Yang D, Lang L, Xi L, Sun K, Chen Y, Shu K, et al: MiR-205/YAP1 in activated fibroblasts of breast tumor promotes VEGF-independent angiogenesis through STAT3 signaling. Theranostics. 7:3972–3988. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Kwiatkowski BA, Kirillova I, Richard RE, Israeli D and Yablonka-Reuveni Z: FGFR4 and its novel splice form in myogenic cells: Interplay of glycosylation and tyrosine phosphorylation. J Cell Physiol. 215:803–817. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Zhu M, Liu C, Li S, Zhang S, Yao Q and Song Q: Sclerostin induced tumor growth, bone metastasis and osteolysis in breast cancer. Sci Rep. 7:113992017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Zou P, Zhu M, Lian C, Wang J, Chen Z, Zhang X, Yang Y, Chen X, Cui X, Liu J, et al: miR-192-5p suppresses the progression of lung cancer bone metastasis by targeting TRIM44. Sci Rep. 9:196192019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Schultz SS and Lucas PA: Human stem cells isolated from adult skeletal muscle differentiate into neural phenotypes. J Neurosci Methods. 152:144–155. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Chu Q, Sun Y, Bi D, Cui J and Xu T: Up-regulated of miR-8159-5p and miR-217-5p by LPS stimulation negatively co-regulate TLR1 in miiuy croaker. Dev Comp Immunol. 67:117–125. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Erdos Z, Barnum JE, Wang E, DeMaula C, Dey PM, Forest T, Bailey WJ and Glaab WE: Evaluation of the relative performance of pancreas specific microRNAs in rat plasma as biomarkers of pancreas injury. Toxicol Sci. 173:5–18. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Du W, Tang H, Lei Z, Zhu J, Zeng Y, Liu Z and Huang JA: miR-335-5p inhibits TGF-β1-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in non-small cell lung cancer via ROCK1. Respir Res. 20:2252019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Choi YJ, Kim H, Kim JW, Song CW, Kim DS, Yoon S and Park HJ: Phthalazinone pyrazole enhances the hepatic functions of human embryonic stem cell-derived hepatocyte-like cells via suppression of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 14:438–450. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Schmidt M, Schüler SC, Hüttner SS, von Eyss B and von Maltzahn J: Adult stem cells at work: Regenerating skeletal muscle. Cell Mol Life Sci. 76:2559–2570. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Dumont NA, Bentzinger CF, Sincennes MC and Rudnicki MA: Satellite cells and skeletal muscle regeneration. Compr Physiol. 5:1027–1059. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Feige P, Brun CE, Ritso M and Rudnicki MA: Orienting muscle stem cells for regeneration in homeostasis, aging, and disease. Cell Stem Cell. 23:653–664. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Sato T, Yamamoto T and Sehara-Fujisawa A: miR-195/497 induce postnatal quiescence of skeletal muscle stem cells. Nat Commun. 5:45972014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Tirone M, Giovenzana A, Vallone A, Zordan P, Sormani M, Nicolosi PA, Meneveri R, Gigliotti CR, Spinelli AE, Bocciardi R, et al: Severe heterotopic ossification in the skeletal muscle and endothelial cells recruitment to chondrogenesis are enhanced by monocyte/macrophage depletion. Front Immunol. 10:16402019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Zhao Y, Chen M, Lian D, Li Y, Li Y, Wang J, Deng S, Yu K and Lian Z: Non-coding RNA regulates the myogenesis of skeletal muscle satellite cells, injury repair and diseases. Cells. 8:E9882019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Kletukhina S, Neustroeva O, James V, Rizvanov A and Gomzikova M: Role of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles in epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Int J Mol Sci. 20:E48132019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Sadej R, Lu X, Turczyk L, Novitskaya V, Lopez-Clavijo AF, Kordek R, Potemski P, Wakelam MJO, Romanska-Knight H and Berditchevski F: CD151 regulates expression of FGFR2 in breast cancer cells via PKC-dependent pathways. J Cell Sci. 131:jcs2206402018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Li L, Zhang S, Wei L, Wang Z, Ma W, Liu F and Qian Y: FGF2 and FGFR2 in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and lung cancer. Oncol Lett. 16:2490–2494. 2018.PubMed/NCBI

42 

Vanmechelen M, Lambrechts D, Van Brussel T, Verbiest A, Couchy G, Schöffski P, Dumez H, Debruyne PR, Lerut E, Machiels JP, et al: Fibroblast growth factor receptor-2 polymorphism rs2981582 is correlated with progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 17:e235–e246. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Maehara O, Suda G, Natsuizaka M, Ohnishi S, Komatsu Y, Sato F, Nakai M, Sho T, Morikawa K, Ogawa K, et al: Fibroblast growth factor-2-mediated FGFR/Erk signaling supports maintenance of cancer stem-like cells in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Carcinogenesis. 38:1073–1083. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Wang D, Yang L, Yu W and Zhang Y: Investigational fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 antagonists in early phase clinical trials to treat solid tumors. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 28:903–916. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Wang Y and Qin H: miR-338-3p targets RAB23 and suppresses tumorigenicity of prostate cancer cells. Am J Cancer Res. 8:2564–2574. 2018.PubMed/NCBI

46 

Shanmuganathan S and Angayarkanni N: Chebulagic acid and Chebulinic acid inhibit TGF-β1 induced fibrotic changes in the chorio-retinal endothelial cells by inhibiting ERK phosphorylation. Microvasc Res. 121:14–23. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Xu Y, Xiao H, Luo H, Chen Y, Zhang Y, Tao L, Jiang Y, Chen Y and Shen X: Inhibitory effects of oxymatrine on TGF-β1-induced proliferation and abnormal differentiation in rat cardiac fibroblasts via the p38MAPK and ERK1/2 signaling pathways. Mol Med Rep. 16:5354–5362. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Huang V, Place RF, Portnoy V, Wang J, Qi Z, Jia Z, Yu A, Shuman M, Yu J and Li LC: Upregulation of Cyclin B1 by miRNA and its implications in cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:1695–1707. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

49 

Vasudevan S: Posttranscriptional upregulation by microRNAs. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 3:311–330. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

50 

Lu H, Buchan RJ and Cook SA: MicroRNA-223 regulates Glut4 expression and cardiomyocyte glucose metabolism. Cardiovasc Res. 86:410–420. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

51 

Saifi M, Yogindran S, Nasrullah N, Nissar U, Gul I and Abdin MZ: Co-expression of anti-miR319g and miRStv_11 lead to enhanced steviol glycosides content in Stevia rebaudiana. BMC Plant Biol. 19:2742019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

52 

Alessandri G, Pagano S, Bez A, Benetti A, Pozzi S, Iannolo G, Baronio M, Invernici G, Caruso A, Muneretto C, et al: Isolation and culture of human muscle-derived stem cells able to differentiate into myogenic and neurogenic cell lineages. Lancet. 364:1872–1883. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

August-2020
Volume 22 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Zhu M, Chen G, Yang Y, Yang J, Qin B and Gu L: miR‑217‑5p regulates myogenesis in skeletal muscle stem cells by targeting FGFR2. Mol Med Rep 22: 850-858, 2020
APA
Zhu, M., Chen, G., Yang, Y., Yang, J., Qin, B., & Gu, L. (2020). miR‑217‑5p regulates myogenesis in skeletal muscle stem cells by targeting FGFR2. Molecular Medicine Reports, 22, 850-858. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2020.11133
MLA
Zhu, M., Chen, G., Yang, Y., Yang, J., Qin, B., Gu, L."miR‑217‑5p regulates myogenesis in skeletal muscle stem cells by targeting FGFR2". Molecular Medicine Reports 22.2 (2020): 850-858.
Chicago
Zhu, M., Chen, G., Yang, Y., Yang, J., Qin, B., Gu, L."miR‑217‑5p regulates myogenesis in skeletal muscle stem cells by targeting FGFR2". Molecular Medicine Reports 22, no. 2 (2020): 850-858. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2020.11133