circRNA‑0006896‑miR1264‑DNMT1 axis plays an important role in carotid plaque destabilization by regulating the behavior of endothelial cells in atherosclerosis
- Authors:
- Published online on: March 1, 2021 https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2021.11950
- Article Number: 311
-
Copyright: © Wen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Atherosclerosis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the vascular wall with multiple causes. It is characterized by the deposition of lipids in the arterial wall, infiltration of immune cells, and formation of fibrous caps (1). AS is the leading pathological cause of cardiovascular disease and stroke. Carotid plaque rupture and thrombus formation are the main causes of ischemic stroke. Patients with unstable/vulnerable plaque AS (UA) are prone to rupture and thrombus formation, leading to cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events, such as acute coronary syndrome, ischemic stroke, and peripheral vascular disease (2). Therefore, identifying the properties of carotid plaques may help improve the prediction and prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. Previous reports noted that several factors sampled from plasma or serum may contribute to carotid plaque vulnerability, symptom status, degree of stenosis and stroke risk. These factors include the serum protein C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 9, microRNA (miR)-17-92, and circular RNA (circRNA)-089763 (3–5).
Exosomes are extracellular vesicles secreted by living cells. They can circulate in biological fluids, permeate biological barriers (for example, the brain-blood barrier or the placental barrier), target recipient cells, and thus share intercellular signaling molecules between cells (6,7). Exosomes may represent a potential and effective tool for the diagnosis and treatment of diseases, due to their extensive presence in the body and relative ease of sampling. Exosomes can also be a source of disease-related proteins, miRNAs, and circRNAs (8–10). Transfer of exosome-enclosed proteins, miRNAs and circRNAs has been identified as an intercellular communication method in cardiovascular diseases, such as atherosclerosis (11,12). The signaling molecules carried by exosomes circulate in the body and can affect the biological behavior of target cells, thereby acting as key factors in disease development.
circRNAs are endogenous non-coding RNA molecules that differ from linear RNA by their structure, a closed covalent loop lacking 3′ or 5′ polarity (13). circRNAs can sponge miRNAs through stable complementary binding and regulate gene expression. Numerous studies have demonstrated that circRNAs are stable and abundant within exosomes; moreover, they may be key to the mechanisms through which exosomes promote certain disease (1,14,15).
Emerging evidence suggests that endothelial cell dysfunction induces an increase in cell proliferation and migration that leads to re-endothelialization and angiogenesis of carotid plaques, which in turn promotes plaque destabilization, plaque rupture, and thrombus formation (16–18). However, whether exosomal circRNAs in the serum of patients with carotid plaques are involved in this process remains unknown.
The aim of the present study was to determine whether exosomal circRNAs were associated with UA formation. Specifically, the regulatory role of serum exosomal circRNAs on endothelial cell behavior was examined in patients with UA, in order to identify novel mechanisms underlying plaque stability.
Materials and methods
Patient recruitment
The present study was approved by The Ethics Committee of The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants or their families. A total of 42 patients diagnosed with carotid plaque under B-ultrasound examination at The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University from March 2017 and December 2017 were enrolled in this study. The exclusion criteria were: i) total occlusion lesion; ii) acute coronary syndrome; iii) cardiac shock; and iv) presence of cardiomyopathy, severe anemia, severe renal impairment, or malignant tumor.
Carotid plaque images were obtained using a 1.5-T magnetic resonance system (1.5-T system; Philips Healthcare). A volume isotropic turbo spin echo acquisition (VISTA) sequence was used. The iMap parameters were as follows: i) T1-weighted VISTA, Time of Repetition (TR)/Time of Echo (TE)=400/16 ms, refocusing angle=60°, thickness=1 mm, field of view=18 cm, matrix=384×384, SENSE factor=2, number of signal averaging=2); ii) T2-weighted VISTA, TR/TE=3500/119 ms, refocusing angle=60°, thickness=1 mm, field of view=18 cm, matrix=384×384, SENSE factor=2, number of signal averaging=2, and iii) time of flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography, TR/TE=16/6.9 ms, flip angle=60°, thickness=1.5 mm, field of view=22 cm, matrix=512×512, SENSE factor=1.8, number of signal averaging=2. Patients with lipid-rich and necrotic core plaques were diagnosed with UA (n=20) according to previous studies (signal intensity ratio ≥1.25 using T1-weighted VISTA) (19,20). All other patients were diagnosed with SA (n=22). Clinical and demographic characteristics, as well as information on ongoing treatments are presented in Table I.
Exosome isolation
A volume of 100 µl serum was collected from every patient. All samples were combined into a UA serum pool and an SA serum pool. Both serum pools were centrifuged for 20 min at 2,000 × g, 30 min at 10,000 × g, then 20 min at 14,000 × g. All centrifugation steps were performed at 4°C. Exosomes were then isolated using a GET-Exosome isolation kit (GenExosome Technologies, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The concentration of exosomes was evaluated using a BCA assay. All serum-Exos were stored at −80°C or immediately used for further experiments.
circRNA isolation
Exosomal circRNAs were extracted from serum-Exos using Trizol® (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). For digestion of linear RNAs, 1 mg of total RNA was incubated with 2 U/µg RNase R for 1 h at 37°C (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The purity and concentration of the RNA samples were assessed with a NanoDrop™ spectrophotometer (NanoDrop™ Technologies; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.).
circRNA microarray analysis
Following extraction from SA or UA serum-Exos pools, circRNAs were divided into three parallel samples for each group (SA-Exos-1, 2 and 3 vs. UA-Exos-1, 2 and 3) and used for circRNA microarray analysis. The Human CircRNA Array v2 (CapitalBio Technology Co., Ltd.) was used; with each slide containing four identical arrays (4×180K format), representing ~170,340 human circRNAs. A total of 4,974 Agilent control probes were included in the array, and 7,775 circRNAs were examined. GeneSpring software (version 13.0; Agilent Technologies, Inc.) was used to analyze, standardize and control the quality of the circRNA microarray data. To identify the differentially expressed genes, a fold change threshold of ≥1.2 or ≤-1.2 was used. Statistical analysis was carried out using Student's t-test, with P<0.05 indicating a statistically significant difference. Cluster 3.0 (Stanford University) was used for log2 transformation and median centering of the data, which were further analyzed through hierarchical clustering using the average linkage criterion. The miRanda (http://www.miranda.org/) and CircInteractome (https://circinteractome.nia.nih.gov/) tools were used to select the target miRNAs of circRNA-0006896 and construct a circRNA-miRNA network. A competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network map was constructed using Cytoscape.
Cell culture
Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection and cultured in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS (both from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. At 80–90% confluence, cells were sub-cultured at a dilution ratio of 1:3. All experiments were performed with cells in the logarithmic growth phase. For experiments, the cells were cultured to approximately 80% confluence prior to incubation with serum exosomes from AS patients with UA (UA-Exos) or stable plaque (SA-Exos).
Exosome tracking
Isolated exosomes were labelled using a GET-Exosome labeling kit (GenExosome Technologies, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, 500 µg/ml serum-Exos (or PBS as a control) were mixed with an equal volume of GenExosome ExoPKH26 tracking dye for 10 min at 37°C. The free dye was then removed using GenExosome centrifugal columns (10-kDa cutoff). Next, 1×105 cell/ml HUVECs were seeded in a 35-mm confocal dish and incubated with 50 µl 500 µg/ml labelled UA-Exos or SA-Exos (or PBS as a control) in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 1% exosome-free FBS at 37°C for 24 h. Internalized, labelled exosome signals were visualized under a confocal fluorescence microscope (magnification, ×400; Leica Microsystems, Inc.).
Dual-luciferase reporter assay
Dual-luciferase reporter assays were performed using the psiCHECK2 vector (Promega Corporation). First, the wild-type (WT) or mutant (MUT) circRNA-0006896 sequences of the putative binding-site for miR1264 were subcloned into the psiCHECK2 vector. Next, 293 cells (ATCC) were seeded in 24-well plates at a density of 5 ×104 cells/well and co-transfected with of psiCHECK2-circRNA-0006896-WT or -MUT, together with the miR-1264 mimic or mimic-miR-control (0.2 mg luciferase plasmid and 50 nM miRNA mimic) using Lipofectamine® 3000 (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The cells were harvested 48 h after transfection, and luciferase activity was assessed with a Dual-Luciferase® Reporter Assay System (Promega Corporation). Results are presented as relative Renilla luciferase activities, which were normalized to firefly luciferase activities.
RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)
RNA FISH was performed to determine the location of circRNA-0006896 and miR1264 in HUVECs. Biotin-labelled circRNA- 0006896 (5′-biotin-TGTATGGGGAGATGTCTCTCTTTGAGTTAGGTCTAAAGATGATGG-3′) and digoxigenin-labeled miR-1264 probes (5′-digoxigenin---AACAGGTGCTCAAATAAGACTTG 3′) were designed and synthesized by Guangzhou RiboBio Co., Ltd. HUVECs were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 1×105 cells/ml and incubated with 200 µl UA-Exos (500 µg/ml) or SA-Exos (500 µg/ml) or PBS (mock group) in 2 ml conditioned medium at 37°C for 24 h. After immobilization with 4% paraformaldehyde, cells were prehybridized in prehybridization buffer (1X PBS with 0.5% Triton X-100), then hybridized in hybridization buffer (40% formamide; 10% Dextran sulfate; 1X Denhardt's solution; 4X saline sodium citrate buffer; 10 mM DDT, 1 mg/ml yeast transfer RNA; 1 mg/ml sheared salmon sperm DNA) with 20 nmol biotin-labelled probes specific for circRNA-0006896 and 20 nmol digoxigenin-labelled locked nucleic acid miR-1264 probes at 60°C overnight. The signals of biotin-labelled probes were detected using Cy3-Streptavidin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The signals of digoxigenin-labelled locked nucleic acid miR-1264 probes were detected using the Molecular Probes™ TSA™ kit with Alexa Fluor™ 488 tyramide reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Finally, the cells were incubated with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; 1:100, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) for 15 min at room temperature. The images were acquired using a confocal microscope (magnification, ×600; Leica Microsystems, Inc.).
RNA extraction and reverse-transcription quantitative (RT-q) PCR
Total RNAs were extracted from pooled serum-Exos samples, serum-Exos samples from individual patients or HUVECs by using Trizol® reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The individual serum-Exos samples was isolated from a 500-µl volume of individual patient serum using a GET-Exosome isolation kit (GenExosome Technologies, Inc.). circRNAs or DNMT1mRNA were reverse transcribed to cDNA with a RevertAid™H Minus First-Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Fermentas, Inc.). The reverse-transcription reaction was carried out for 60 min at 42°C, followed by a second step of 10 min at 70°C and a final hold at 4°C. miR-1264 was reverse transcribed to cDNA with a Mir-X™ miRNA First-Strand Synthesis Kit (Clontech Laboratories, Inc.). The RT reaction was carried out for 60 min at 37°C, followed by a second step of 5 min at 85°C and a final hold at 4°C. All cDNA was synthesized from 1 µg of total RNA. The qPCR was carried out using a SYBR™ Green PCR Master Mix Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.).
The sequences of the primers (all from GeneCopoeia) used were as follows: i) circRNA-0006896 forward, 5′-TTGGGAAGCCTGGAATATGA-3′ and reverse, 5′-TGGGGAGATGTCTCTCTTTGA-3′; ii) circRNA-0012592 forward, 5′-TCGCATCTACTGGTGTGACC-3′ and reverse, 5′-TCAGTGCAGATGTGTGAGCA-3′; iii) circRNA-0087352 forward, 5′-TGATGCAGGAGATGATGAGG-3′ and reverse, 5′-ATTATATCCCCCTGGGATGC-3′; iv) circRNA-0073009 forward, 5′-TTGCTATGACTACATTTTGAGGTTTT-3′ and reverse, 5′-TGGCCTCTCCGAAGTAGAAA-3′; v) circRNA-0008517 forward, 5′-GAATCAAACCTTGGGGACCT-3′ and reverse, 5′-AAGGATGGGTTCAGGTAGGG-3′; vi) circRNA-0009054 forward, 5′-CTTTCCTCCAACAGCCACAC-3′ and reverse, 5′-CTGCACGCTCTGTAGTCGAG-3′; vii) DNMT1 forward, 5′-CCTAGCCCCAGGATTACAAGG-3′ and reverse, 5′-ACTCATCCGATTTGGCTCTTTC-3′; viii) GAPDH forward, 5′-CAATGACCCCTTCATTGACC-3′ and reverse, 5′-TTGATTTTGGAGGGATCTCG-3′; ix) miR1264 forward, 5′-CAAGTCTTATTTGAGCACCTGTT-3′ and Universal 5′ primer 5′-GCGAGCACAGAATTAATACGAC-3′; x) U6 forward, 5′-CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA-3′ and reverse, 5′-AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT-3′. The thermocycling conditions consisted of an initial denaturation for 2 min at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles of 20 sec at 95°C, 30 sec at 60°C, and 40 sec at 72°C. All reactions were performed in an ABI 7500 real-time fluorescence qPCR system (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). GAPDH and U6 snRNA were used as the reference gene. Relative gene expression levels were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCq method (21).
Western blot analysis
Serum-Exos and HUVECs were collected and incubated on ice for 30 min using RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) containing protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA). Protein quantification was performed by Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The equivalent of 5 µg protein were separated by 8–12% SDS-PAGE (Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.), then transferred to PVDF (EMD Millipore). After blocking using 5% non-fat milk for 1 h at room temperature, the membrane was incubated with 1:1,000 dilution of primary antibodies against CD63 (cat. no. ab134045), CD9 (cat. no. ab92726), TSG101 (cat. no. ab125011), phosphorylated (p)-STAT3 (cat. no. ab76315), STAT3 (cat. no. ab68153), SOCS3 (cat. no. ab16030), DNMT1 (cat. no. ab188453) and GAPDH (cat. no. ab8245; reference protein) overnight at 4°C. Next, the membrane was rinsed three times with TBS + 0.1% Tween-20 and incubated for 1 h with the horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit (ab205718; 1:5,000) or goat anti-mouse (ab205719; 1:5,000) secondary antibodies at ambient temperature. Finally, The signal of protein bands were visualized by Pierce™ ECL Western Blotting Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) using the Tanon 4200 system (Tanon). The integrated density values were calculated using Quantity One v4.6.6 software (Bio-Rad Raboratories). All antibodies were purchased from Abcam.
MTT assay
HUVECs were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 5×104 cells/ml in a100-µl volume of conditioned medium. Experimental samples were treated with 50 µg/ml UA-Exos or SA-Exos for 24 or 48 h, while mock samples were treated with PBS. Blank wells were prepared by adding 100 µl of culture medium to one well per plate. For each group, six replicates were set up in adjacent wells. After incubation, 20 µl MTT (5 g/l) was added to each well, and the plate was incubated for an additional 4 h at 37°C. Then, the medium in each well was removed, and 150 µl of DMSO was added for 10 min. The absorbance was measured in each well at 490 nm using a Multiskan Ascent instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Each experiment was repeated three times.
Wound healing assay
HUVECs were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 1×106 cells/ ml in a 2-ml volume of FBS-free RPMI-1640 medium. Experimental samples were treated with 50 µg/ml UA-Exos or SA-Exos, while mock samples were treated with PBS. When cell confluence reached 80–90%, then a wound was created across the diameter of the well surface with a pipette tip. After 24 h, the wound area was measured under a light microscope (magnification, ×100). The migration distance was measured at five locations per sample. The level of migration area was evaluated as follows: migration area (%)=(A0-A1)/A0 × 100, where A0 is the initial wound area and A1 is the wound area at 24 h.
Transwell migration assay
Cell migration assays were performed using Transwell cell culture chambers (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). HUVECs were seeded into the upper chamber at a density of 2×104 cells/ml in a 100-µl volume of conditioned medium, to which 50 µg/ml UA-Exos or SA-Exos was added. The HUVECs treated with 50 µl PBS were used as mock group. The lower chamber was loaded with 0.8 ml medium supplemented with 10% exosome-free FBS. The Transwell plates were incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 24 h. After incubation, the filters were stained with 0.1% crystal violet, then decolorized with 33% acetic acid (22). Finally, the absorbance was measured at 570 nm using a Multiskan Ascent instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) to evaluate the migratory ability of HUVECs.
Statistical analysis
SPSS 16.0 (SPPS, Inc.) was used for statistical analysis. The distribution of the data was determined using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Normally distributed data are presented as the mean ± SD, and were analyzed using an unpaired Student's t-test, or one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni correction. Data with a skewed distribution are presented as the medians and interquartile ranges (IQR), and were analyzed using Mann-Whitney's U test. Categorical variables are presented as counts or percentages, and were analyzed using the χ2 test. Correlations between serum-Exo-circRNA-0006986 and clinical biochemical parameters were evaluated using Spearman's rank correlation analysis. Scientific graphs were generated using GraphPad Prism (version 5.0; GraphPad Software, Inc.). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Demographic and baseline characteristics of the study population
A total of 22 patients with SA (age range, 37–57) and 20 patients with (age range, 41–65) were enrolled in this study. Their baseline clinical and biochemical characteristics are summarized in Table I. The concentration the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were significantly increased in the UA group, compared with the SA group. No significant differences in age, sex, smoking status, or any other biochemical parameter were observed between the two groups.
Exosome isolation and identification
Serum samples from patients with SA or UA were pooled for exosome extraction (Fig. 1A). Under the transmission electron microscope, the exosomes exhibited a double-membrane structure in both groups, and the diameters of most exosomes were <200 nm (Fig. 1B). Moreover, the exosomes expressed the exosomal markers CD9, CD63, and TSG101 (Fig. 1C). The concentration of exosomes in the SA group was significantly increased, compared with the UA group (P<0.001). However, their diameters were only marginally different in the two groups (P<0.05; Fig. 1D-F).
circRNA profile overview
The expression profile of Exos-circRNAs was determined using microarray analysis. The expression levels of circRNA molecules were normalized to the same order of magnitude prior to the statistical analysis. The median expression levels of different groups nearly the same following normalization, indicating a great degree of standardization (Fig. 2A). A total of 75 significant differentially expressed circRNAs in the UA-Exos and SA-Exos groups are displayed as a volcano plot in Fig. 2B. A scatter plot demonstrated the variability of 5,343 circRNAs expression in UA-Exos and SA-Exos (Fig. 2C). The expression levels of all 5,343 circRNAs in UA-Exos and SA-Exos were quantified and visualized on a hierarchical clustering heat map. Only 37 circRNAs were upregulated and 48 were downregulated in the UA-Exos group, compared with SA-Exos, indicating a strikingly similar expression pattern of circRNAs between these two groups (Fig. 2D).
RT-qPCR validation, prediction of mRNA-miRNA-circRNA relationships and enrichment analysis of the biological functions of circRNA-0006896-co-expressed genes
To verify the microarray profiling expression data, the expression of the three most upregulated (circRNA-0006896, circRNA-0012592 and circRNA-0087352) or downregulated circRNAs (circRNA-0073009, circRNA-0008517 and circRNA-0009054) was validated using RT-qPCR. Among these circRNAs, the circRNA-0006896 was the only one that expressed over ~2-fold UA-Exos samples relative to SA-Exos (Fig. 3A). Therefore, circRNA-0006896 was selected as a candidate for subsequent experiments. Moreover, the expression trend of circRNA-0006896 was further verified in individual serum-Exos samples from patients with SA (n=22) and UA (n=20). As shown in Fig. 3B, the expression of circRNA-0006896 was significantly increased in serum-Exos from UA patients, compared with SA patients. These results suggested that circRNA-0006896 may be involved in plaque instability.
Furthermore, circRNAs can serve as a competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) to sponge miRNAs to regulate the target mRNAs (14,15). To describe the role of circRNA-0006896 during the progression of carotid plaque destabilization, bioinformatics analysis was used to predict the potential target miRNAs of circRNA-0006896 and construct a circRNA-miRNA network map associated with AS. This analysis predicted seven target miRNAs (miR-1264, miR-1279, miR-570, miR-593, miR-630 and miR-653) for circRNA-0006896. A ceRNA network map was then constructed, which contained one circRNA, six miRNAs and 768 mRNAs (Fig. 3C). This network map revealed that the upregulation of circRNA-0006896 in UA -Exos might upregulate the expression levels of 122 mRNA molecules by reducing the expression of miR1264, upregulate 118 mRNA targets by reducing the expression of miR1279, upregulate 70 mRNA targets by reducing the expression of miR570, upregulate 285 mRNA targets by reducing the expression of miR593, upregulate 96 mRNA targets by reducing the expression of miR630 and upregulate 194 mRNA targets by reducing the expression of miR653 (Fig. 3C).
Correlations between circRNA-006896 serum-Exos levels with biochemical parameters in AS patients
To further examine the role of circRNA-0006896 in the progression of carotid plaque instability, Spearman's rank correlation analysis was carried out to determine whether exosomal circRNA-0006896 levels were associated with biochemical parameters in patients with SA or UA. circRNA-006896 levels in serum-Exos were positively correlated with LDL-C levels in the SA group. Moreover, in the UA group, they were also positively correlated with triglyceride, LDL-C and CRP levels, but negatively correlated with albumin levels. Moreover, no statistically significant correlations were observed between the serum-Exo-circRNA-006896 level and the levels of total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, glucose, glycated hemoglobin, uric acid, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, blood urea nitrogen, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase, or creatinine in either the UA or SA group (Table II). These findings suggested that the increased expression of circRNA-006896 in UA serum-Exos was positively correlated with the levels of TG, LDL-C and CRP in UA patients.
 | Table II.Correlation between circRNA-0006896 expression and biochemical parameters in AS patients with SA or UA. |
UA-Exos influence the circRNA-0006896-miR-1264-DNMT1 axis in HUVECs
A previous study reported that HUVEC proliferation and migration are important events that induce plaque destabilization (23,24). The signaling molecules carried by exosomes may affect the biological behavior of target cells in the microenvironment (25). Therefore, it was hypothesized that endothelial cell phagocytosis of serum-Exos containing high levels of circRNA-0006896 could promote endothelial cell proliferation and migration, leading to plaque instability. According to the ceRNA network hypothesis, circRNAs can abolish the inhibitory effect of miRNAs on their target genes and cause changes in intracellular signaling pathways (26). Thus, in this study, the role of the circRNA-0006896 ceRNA network in HUVECs following treatment with serum-Exos was further examined.
RT-qPCR analysis suggested that miR1264 was the most downregulated of the six circRNA-0006896-targeted miRNAs following treatment with UA-Exos (Fig. 4A). A previous report indicated that miR-1264 targets the DNMT1 transcript by binding to its 3′UTR, thus affecting DNMT1 expression and enzyme activity in miR-1264--transfected cells (27,28). Thus, it was hypothesized that circRNA-0006896 may regulate HUVEC behavior through a circRNA-0006896-miR-1264-DNMT1 axis. The miRanda database suggested that the 3′-UTR of circRNA-0006896 contains a putative direct binding site for miR1264 (Fig. 4B). Dual-luciferase reporter assays indicated that co-transfection of WT circRNA-0006896 with miR1264 mimics would lead to a significant reduction in fluorescence intensity, compared with co-transfection with control miRNA mimics. However, relative fluorescence intensity was not changed when the MUT circRNA-0006896 construct was co-transfected, indicating the specific miR1264 sponges function of circRNA-0006896 (Fig. 4C). In addition, confocal microscopy images indicated that the amount of exosomes phagocytosed by HUVECs did not appear different between the SA and UA-Exos groups (Fig. 4D). FISH also confirmed that circRNA-0006896 colocalized with miR-1264 around the nuclear membrane (Fig. 4E).
Furthermore, the expression levels of circRNA-0006896, miR1264 and DNMT1 were measured in HUVECs following treatment with serum-Exos from patients with UA or SA. In the UA group, the expression levels of both circRNA-0006896 and DNMT1 were significantly increased, compared with the SA group. In addition, the expression of miR-1264 was significantly lower, compared with the SA group (Fig. 4F-H). Therefore, the expression levels of circRNA-0006896, DNMT1 and miR-1264 differed following treatment with SA or UA-Exos. These data indicated that the high levels of circRNA-0006896 contained within UA-Exos can affect the expression of miR-1264 and DNMT1 in HUVECs, whereas the small amounts of circRNA-0006896 contained in SA-Exos do not.
The circRNA-0006896 network in UA exosomes increases the proliferation and migration of HUVECs
Previous studies have documented that DNMT1 is a critical regulator of JNK, STAT, and NF-κB signaling during the development of UA because an increase DNMT1 expression results in CpG island hypermethylation in the promoter region of SOCS3, which downregulates its expression (28). Low expression of SOCS3 promotes JNK/STAT signaling, thus increasing the proliferation and migration of HUVECs (29), which in turn leads to plaque destabilization and promotes AS development (23,30,31). Thus, functional assays using HUVECs treated with UA or SA-Exos were carried out to explore the role of circRNA-0006896, miR-1264 and DNMT1 in AS development.
Western blot analysis suggested that there was an inverse relationship between SOCS3 and DNMT1 expression. Indeed, SOCS3 protein expression was reduced in HUVECs following treatment with UA-Exos, compared with SA-Exos and mock groups. This was accompanied by a significant increase in STAT3 phosphorylation (Fig. 5A). In addition, the proliferation of HUVECs was significantly increased in the UA-Exos group, compared with the SA serum-Exos and mock groups at 24 and 48 h. (Fig. 5B). A wound healing assay was conducted to investigate the effects of circRNA-006896 on HUVEC migration. HUVEC migration increased by ~20% in the UA-Exos group, compared with the SA-Exos and mock groups (Fig. 5C). In a Transwell assay, staining intensity significantly increased for HUVECs after treatment with UA-Exos for 48 h, compared with the UA and mock groups, suggesting increased HUVEC migration (Fig. 5D). Collectively, these results suggested that high concentrations of circRNA-0006896 in UA-Exos enhances the proliferation and migration of HUVECs, possibly through DNMT1/SOCS3/JNK/STAT3 signaling.
Discussion
Previous studies have been conducted to identify therapeutic targets for UA, most of which have been limited to protein-coding genes, miRNAs and lncRNAs (32–35). Recently, circRNAs have attracted attention as new diagnostic markers for diseases, including cancer. circRNAs constitute a rich, stable, diverse and conserved family of RNA molecules. Emerging evidence suggests that circRNAs participate in various biological processes, such as angiogenesis, proliferation, and differentiation (36). Recently, Zhang et al (37) demonstrated that the crosstalk between circRNAs and their competing mRNAs might play crucial roles in the development of UA by regulating cell adhesion, migration, and activation. Moreover, exosomal circRNAs derived from peripheral circulating serum are associated with UA formation. Jiang et al (38) reported that peripheral circulating serum-Exos are can induce TNF-α and IL-6 production in macrophages through their miRNA cargo.
An increase in inflammatory cytokines has been proven to be related to plaque vulnerability across various stages of AS, in which vascular endothelial cells are dysfunctional and induced by stimulatory factors. Endothelial cell functions, such as antithrombogenicity and angiogenic sprouting capacity, are lost. However, mesenchymal cell characteristics, such as contractility, proliferation, and migration, are enhanced. Functionally, endothelial cells play a vital role in the development and ultimate rupture of unstable plaques, which cause most acute coronary artery events (3,23). However, few studies have explored the stimulatory effect of peripheral circulating serum-Exos on the vascular endothelium in AS patients.
Therefore, in the present study, the circRNA expression profiles of serum-Exos from patients with SA or UA were used to assess the effect of exosomal circRNAs on vascular endothelial cell activation. circRNA-0006896 was selected for further study due to its higher expression in patients with UA, compared with patients with SA. Furthermore, the expression levels of circRNA-0006896 were positively correlated with the levels of triglyceride, LDL-C and CRP, and negatively correlated with albumin levels in patients with UA. Since increased levels of serum LDL-C and CRP are an important clinical feature of UA formation, it was hypothesized that serum-Exo-circRNA-0006896, which is positively correlated with their expression, could play an important role in the formation of unstable carotid plaques.
The circRNA-0006896-miR-1264-DNMT1 axis was selected as a platform to study the regulatory roles of circRNA-0006896 in serum-Exos through circRNA bioinformatic analysis. The results indicated that following treatment with UA serum-Exos, the expression of circRNA-0006896 in HUVECs was upregulated, which was accompanied by downregulated expression of miR1264 and upregulated expression of DNMT1 mRNA. Recently, DNMT1 has been identified as the direct target of miR1264, which can bind to the 3′UTR of the DNMT1 transcript to inhibit its expression. DNMT1 is an important enzyme implicated in DNA methylation, particularly in the promoter region of SOCS3. Moreover, CpG islands, one of which is located at kb 4.261–6.673 in the SOCS3 genomic locus, regulate DNMT1 function (27,28). miR-1264 downregulation facilitates persistent DNMT1 expression, thereby inducing SOCS3 promoter methylation and impacting its gene expression (27). Downregulated expression of SOCS3 results in loss of its inhibitory effect on the JNK/STAT3 pathway (30,31). The proliferation and migration of HUVECs were increased most significantly in the UA groups compared to the SA and mock groups, possibly indicating its role in the formation of unstable plaques.
In conclusion, increased expression of circRNA-0006896 in serum-Exos from patients with UA promotes the proliferation and migration of HUVECs by negatively regulating the expression of miR-1264. In turn, this leads to an increase in DNMT1 expression and STAT3 phosphorylation, and a reduction in the expression of SOCS3. These findings indicate that circRNA-0006896 is a potential therapeutic target that regulates JNK/STAT3 pathway activation and may influence vulnerable plaque formation by forming complex regulatory networks in patients with UA. Therefore, this study may provide insight into novel interventions against vulnerable plaque formation in patients with UA.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
The present study were supported by the Shenzhen Sciences and Technology Project Foundation (grant no. JCYJ201700818162010186) and the Public welfare research project in Futian District, Shenzhen (grant. no. FTWS2018073).
Availability of data and materials
The data and materials of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request
Authors' contributions
YW and ZHJ conceived and designed the experiments. YC, YML, ZQL, CJ and ZWY performed the experiments. CYX, ZWQ, LH and LSJ collected and analyzed the data. YW and CJ were the major contributor in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved final version of the manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The present study was approved by the Ethics Revie Committee of the Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen Unive rsity (Shenzhen, China).
Patient consent for publication
All participants have given their written permission for publication of obtained data.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
|
Getz GS and Reardon CA: Atherosclerosis: Cell biology and lipoproteins. Curr Opin Lipidol. 31:286–290. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Harari F, Barregard L, Östling G, Sallsten G, Hedblad B, Forsgard N, Borné Y, Fagerberg B and Engström G: Blood lead levels and risk of atherosclerosis in the carotid artery: Results from a swedish cohort. Environ Health Perspect. 127:1270022019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Schiro A, Wilkinson FL, Weston R, Smyth JV, Serracino-Inglott F and Alexander MY: Elevated levels of endothelial-derived microparticles, and serum CXCL9 and SCGF-β are associated with unstable asymptomatic carotid plaques. Sci Rep. 5:166582015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ferronato S, Mombello A, Posenato I, Candiani P, Scuro A, Setacci C and Gomez-Lira M: Expression of circulating miR-17-92 Cluster and HDAC9 gene in atherosclerotic patients with unstable and stable carotid plaques. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 21:402–405. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang M, Su P, Liu Y, Zhang X, Yan J, An X, Wang X and Gu S: Abnormal expression of circRNA_089763 in the plasma exosomes of patients with postoperative cognitive dysfunction after coronary artery bypass grafting. Mol Med Rep. 20:2549–2562. 2019.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang Y, Xie Y, Zhang A, Wang M, Fang Z and Zhang J: Exosomes: An emerging factor in atherosclerosis. Biomed Pharmacother. 115:1089512019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang Y, Xie Y, Zhang A, Wang M, Fang Z and Zhang J: Corrigendum to ‘Exosomes: An emerging factor in atherosclerosis’. Biomed Pharmacother. 118:1091192019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Dumache R, Ciocan V, Muresan C, Rogobete AF and Enache A: Circulating MicroRNAs as promising biomarkers in forensic body fluids identification. Clin Lab. 61:1129–1135. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Cortez MA, Bueso-Ramos C, Ferdin J, Lopez-Berestein G, Sood AK and Calin GA: MicroRNAs in body fluids-the mix of hormones and biomarkers. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 8:467–477. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kuner R, Brase JC, Sultmann H and Wuttig D: microRNA biomarkers in body fluids of prostate cancer patients. Methods. 59:132–137. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Goetzl EJ, Goetzl L, Karliner JS, Tang N and Pulliam L: Human plasma platelet-derived exosomes: Effects of aspirin. FASEB J. 30:2058–2063. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lu M, Yuan S, Li S, Li L, Liu M and Wan S: The exosome-derived biomarker in atherosclerosis and its clinical application. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 12:68–74. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Geng X, Jia Y, Zhang Y, Shi L, Li Q, Zang A and Wang H: Circular RNA: Biogenesis, degradation, functions and potential roles in mediating resistance to anticarcinogens. Epigenomics. 12:267–283. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang L, Zheng Z, Feng X, Zang X, Ding W, Wu F and Zhao Q: circRNA/lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA network in oxidized, low-density, lipoprotein-induced foam cells. DNA Cell Biol. 38:1499–1511. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Luo J, Liu H, Luan S and Li Z: Guidance of circular RNAs to proteins' behavior as binding partners. Cell Mol Life Sci. 76:4233–4243. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kuret T, Sodin-Semrl S, Mrak-Poljsak K, Cucnik S, Lakota K and Erman A: Interleukin-1β induces intracellular serum amyloid A1 expression in human coronary artery endothelial cells and promotes its intercellular exchange. Inflammation. 42:1413–1425. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Marchio P, Guerra-Ojeda S, Vila JM, Aldasoro M, Victor VM and Mauricio MD: Targeting early atherosclerosis: A focus on oxidative stress and inflammation. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2019:85638452019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lima Junior JC, Moura-Assis A, Cintra RM, Quinaglia T, Velloso LA and Sposito AC: Central role of obesity in endothelial cell dysfunction and cardiovascular risk. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 65:87–97. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Tanemura H, Maeda M, Ichikawa N, Miura Y, Umeda Y, Hatazaki S, Toma N, Asakura F, Suzuki H, Sakaida H, Matsushima S and Taki W: High-risk plaque for carotid artery stenting evaluated with 3-dimensional T1-weighted gradient echo sequence. Stroke. 44:105–110. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yamada K, Yoshimura S, Kawasaki M, Enomoto Y, Asano T, Hara A, Minatoguchi S and Iwama T: Embolic complications after carotid artery stenting or carotid endarterectomy are associated with tissue characteristics of carotid plaques evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging. Atherosclerosis. 215:399–404. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Method. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Wang Y, Shao S, Luo M, Huang S, Feng L, Yuan N, Wu F, Dang C and Zhao X: Effects of rat bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells on breast cancer cells with differing hormone receptor status. Oncol Lett. 14:7269–7275. 2017.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yang XP, Irani K, Mattagajasingh S, Dipaula A, Khanday F, Ozaki M, Fox-Talbot K, Baldwin WM III and Becker LC: Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3alpha and specificity protein 1 interact to upregulate intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in ischemic-reperfused myocardium and vascular endothelium. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 25:1395–1400. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chen LY, Wang X, Qu XL, Pan LN, Wang ZY, Lu YH and Hu HY: Activation of the STAT3/microRNA-21 pathway participates in angiotensin II-induced angiogenesis. J Cell Physiol. 234:19640–19654. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Maia J, Caja S, Strano Moraes MC, Couto N and Costa-Silva B: Exosome-based cell-cell communication in the tumor microenvironment. Front Cell Dev Biol. 6:182018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Awasthi R, Singh AK, Mishra G, Maurya A, Chellappan DK, Gupta G, Hansbro PM and Dua K: An overview of circular RNAs. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1087:3–14. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Boosani CS, Dhar K and Agrawal DK: Down-regulation of hsa-miR-1264 contributes to DNMT1-mediated silencing of SOCS3. Mol Biol Rep. 42:1365–1376. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Boosani CS, Gunasekar P, Block M, Jiang W, Zhang Z, Radwan MM and Agrawal DK: Inhibition of DNA methyltransferase-1 instigates the expression of DNA methyltransferase-3a in angioplasty-induced restenosis. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 96:1030–1039. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Li S, Geng Q, Chen H, Zhang J, Cao C, Zhang F, Song J, Liu C and Liang W: The potential inhibitory effects of miR19b on vulnerable plaque formation via the suppression of STAT3 transcriptional activity. Int J Mol Med. 41:859–867. 2018.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Santana FPR, da Silva RC, Grecco SDS, Pinheiro AJMCR, Caperuto LC, Arantes-Costa FM, Claudio SR, Yoshizaki K, Macchione M, Ribeiro DA, et al: Inhibition of MAPK and STAT3-SOCS3 by sakuranetin attenuated chronic allergic airway inflammation in mice. Mediators Inflamm. 2019:13563562019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Baus D and Pfitzner E: Specific function of STAT3, SOCS1, and SOCS3 in the regulation of proliferation and survival of classical Hodgkin lymphoma cells. Int J Cancer. 118:1404–1413. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lopez-Pedrera C, Barbarroja N, Patino-Trives AM, Collantes E, Aguirre MA and Perez-Sanchez C: New biomarkers for atherothrombosis in antiphospholipid syndrome: Genomics and epigenetics approaches. Front Immunol. 10:7642019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Johnson JL: Elucidating the contributory role of microRNA to cardiovascular diseases (a review). Vascul Pharmacol. 114:31–48. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Berkan O, Arslan S, Lalem T, Zhang L, Sahin NO, Aydemir EI, Korkmaz O, Egilmez HR, Cekin N and Devaux Y: Regulation of microRNAs in coronary atherosclerotic plaque. Epigenomics. 11:1387–1397. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Fasolo F, Di Gregoli K, Maegdefessel L and Johnson JL: Non-coding RNAs in cardiovascular cell biology and atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc Res. 115:1732–1756. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Pan RY, Zhao CH, Yuan JX, Zhang YJ, Jin JL, Gu MF, Mao ZY, Sun HJ, Jia QW, Ji MY, et al: Circular RNA profile in coronary artery disease. Am J Transl Res. 11:7115–7125. 2019.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhang F, Zhang R, Zhang X, Wu Y, Li X, Zhang S, Hou W, Ding Y, Tian J, Sun L and Kong X: Comprehensive analysis of circRNA expression pattern and circRNA-miRNA-mRNA network in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis in rabbits. Aging (Albany NY). 10:2266–2283. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Jiang K, Yang J, Guo S, Zhao G, Wu H and Deng G: Peripheral circulating exosome-mediated delivery of miR-155 as a novel mechanism for acute lung inflammation. Mol Ther. 27:1758–1771. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |
