Myoepithelial carcinoma of the parotid gland with bilateral thyroid involvement: A case report and review of the literature

Introduction

Myoepithelial carcinoma is a rare, locally aggressive, malignant neoplasm that shows exclusive or prominent myoepithelial cell differentiation (1). Its histopathological features, immunohistochemical profile and clinical behavior remain to be delineated and are characterized by a wide range of cytomorphologic features, such as epithelioid, plasmacytoid, spindle and clear cell types, rendering a diagnosis difficult. This entity was initially described in the salivary glands (2). However, it was also identified in the breast, upper aerodigestive tract, skin and other soft tissues (3).

Current observations of this entity showed its invasive behavior as being more infiltrative and metastatic, unlike previous predictions of low-grade malignancy (4). The rate of recurrence and metastasis accounts for approximately 60% (3). Only limited reports on its metastatic behavior are available in the literature. The metastatic sites included the lungs, kidneys, cervical lymph nodes, brain, ribs and the scalp (3,5). This study presents a case of metastatic myoepithelial carcinoma of the thyroid from the parotid gland, which was not found in the updated review of the literature. Immunochemical studies are crucial in order to confirm myoepithelial differentiation of tumor cells. Knowledge of the clinical history, radiographic characterization and morphological correlation with the primary tumor are emphasized.

Patient and methods

Clinical history of patient

A CT scan (Fig. 1) revealed that a 39-year-old Chinese female had a 3.3 cm solid mass in her thyroid, mainly located in the right lobe with bilateral cervical lymph node enlargement, in March 10, 2010. This occurred 21 months following total resection of the right parotid gland. In June 2008, the patient had undergone surgery on the right salivary gland tumor, pathologically diagnosed as ‘the basal cell adenocarcinoma’. The patient then received local 125I radioactive bead implantation one month after the operation. Approximately 12 months later, a soybean-sized tumor appeared on her neck, followed by dysphagia and hoarseness with thyroid enlargement. A neck CT examination was performed in March 10, 2010, showing the thyroid gland and right cervical lymph node enlargement, with no abnormality in the parotid region. A bilateral neck dissection with a total right and partial left thyroidectomy were concomitantly performed. An intraoperative dissection showed the bilateral cervical lymph nodes and thyroid glands to be involved, with the former being swollen, solid and showing invasion into the surrounding tissue, and the latter, particularly the right lobe, having an indefinite boundary with the surrounding tissue. A myoepithelial carcinoma was pathologically diagnosed in the lymph nodes and thyroid postoperatively. Full consent was obtained by the patient.

Figure 1 The CT scan showed a thyroid mass.

Methods

The specimens were routinely processed and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Immunohistochemical staining for CK5, CK18, p63, Calponin, Ki-67 and S-100 was performed using standard avidin-biotin techniques.

Results

The parotid tumor showed nests or trabecular architecture divided by fibrous septa with no ductal or acinar differentiation (Fig. 2A). The neoplastic cells with a myxoid stroma, from the thyroid, exhibited mild cytological atypia and minimal cytoplasm without the ductal lumen structure (Fig. 2B). The neoplastic cells from the involved lymph nodes showed identical morphological features to the primary lesion in the parotid gland (Fig. 2C). The neoplastic cells showed positive immunoreaction for CK5, CK18, Calponin, S-100, Ki-67 and P63, respectively, in Fig. 3, with a strong to weak expression.

Figure 2 (A) The tumor showed nests or trabecular architecture divided by fibrous septa; H&E; magnification, × 100. (B) The tumor metastasized to the thyroid; H&E; magnification, × 200. (C) The tumor metastasized to the lymph nodes; H&E; magnification, × 40.

Figure 3 Positive immunohistochemical staining with (A) CK5, magnification, × 100; (B) CK18, magnification, × 100; (C) Calponin, magnification, × 100; and (D) S-100, magnification, × 100. (E) The nuclear staining of Ki-67 in MEC, magnification, × 100. (F) The tumor cells showed weak nuclear staining of P63 in MEC, magnification, × 200.

The cytomorphology and immunohistochemical findings were similar to those of the previously resected primary myoepithelial carcinoma (MCA) of the parotid gland. The original tumor exhibited an infiltrative multilobular growth pattern with increased mitotic activity (up to 8 mitoses per 10 high power fields) and proliferative rate (Ki-67 index of >75%).

Discussion

Epidemiology and biological behavior of myoepithelial carcinomas

Both benign and malignant tumors in the parotid gland show myoepithelial cell differentiation. Neoplasms composed exclusively of myoepithelial cells are relatively uncommon; their incidence has been identified in 1% of all tumors of the parotid glands, while malignant MCA is extremely rare. The neoplasm occurs primarily in the large salivary glands (85–90%), particularly in the parotid (1–6). Approximately 125 cases of myoepithelial carcinomas have been described thus far (19). The majority of these carcinomas are located in the salivary glands with the exception of cartain rare cases found in the nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses, lacrimal glands, bronchus, lungs or kidneys (7). Due to a lack of myoepithelial differentiation in the thyroid, MCA is generally considered not to occur in the thyroid.

Since myoepithelial carcinomas are rare, no mature and unified identification of their biological behavior exists. The tumor is recognized to be a low-grade malignant tumor by the World Health Organization salivary gland classification, due to its low metastatic potential and potential for local recurrence (8). Nevertheless, with the accumulating data, more than 50% of cases have high-grade potency (3) and either recurrence or distant metastasis. The de novo form is considered to be more aggressive and to have greater metastatic potential (2). However, observations have been contradictory and the metastatic behavior of MCA has yet to be elucidated (1).

The primary parotid MCA exhibits not only the lymph transfer predilection, which often transfers to cervical lymph nodes, but also distant metastasis, including the lungs, bones and liver (9). To the best of our knowledge, this case is the first to involve bilateral thyroids and cervical lymph nodes.

Histological features and pathological diagnosis of myoepithelial carcinomas

Cytomorphologically, myoepithelial tumors may contain four cell types thought to represent various stages in myoepithelial cell differentiation (10). These cell types include spindle-shaped, epithelioid, plasmacytoid and clear cells, or combinations thereof.

The identification of MCA depends on the presence of infiltrative growth, mitotic count, cellular polymorphism, tumor necrosis or a combination thereof (1,2).

Few previous studies exist on the histocytological features of MCA, which showed its cytomorphology to be diverse. Depending on the predominant cell type and immunohistochemical analysis within MCA, differential diagnoses include tumors such as epithelial myoepithelial carcinoma (EMC), clear cell carcinoma (CCC) and carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma, which previously contained the two carcinomas. EMC, another type of salivary gland tumors, has both epithelial and myoepithelial differentiation microscopically with a notable ductal lumen appearance, while CCC lacks epithelial structure (10–13).

Immunohistochemical studies play a key role in the confirmation of myoepithelial differentiation. Current immunohistochemical criteria are dual positivity for the two cytokeratins (including CK5 and CK18). The myoepithelial markers, S-100 protein, calponin, p63, GFAP, CD10, maspin and actins, were shown to be immunohistochemically expressed (14,15). In this case, mild cytological atypia with little focal necrosis was noted. Myoepithelial differentiation was confirmed by strong and diffuse immunoreactivity to keratins 5 and 10, S-100 and P63.

Studies have shown that the anti-P63 antibody is an effective marker of myoepithelial cells with higher specificity (10). However, few studies were published on the expression of P63 in salivary gland tumors (14–17). Certain authors considered that Calponin, an α-smooth muscle actin, is most effective in detecting myoepithelial carcinomas (18). Calponin reacts with 75% of myoepithelial carcinomas (3). In this study, the Calponin expression is strong-positive. Recent research showed that in order to identify the hyperplasty activity using the Ki-67 antibody, immunohistostaining was found to aid somewhat in differentiating the diagnosis of benign from malignant myoepithelialioma. A Ki-67 labeling index of more than 10% may lead to a diagnosis of non-benign myoepithelial carcinoma. On the other hand, the cytological appearance, including infiltrative growth, mitotic count, cellular polymorphism or tumor necrosis, renders it difficult to differentiate malignant from benign myoepithelial carcinoma. In this study, the Ki-67 labeling index was more than 75%.

Myoepithelial carcinoma therapy

As in the case of other malignant tumors, the histological features of MCA have thus far failed to reliably predict prognosis, including biological behavior and clinical outcome. Generally speaking, primary MCAs with significant cytological atypia, high proliferative activity, brisk mitotic rate and necrosis behave aggressively and are more likely to develop distant metastasis (3). Since the clinical manifestation varies from case to case, its pathological features do not correlate with prognosis and a low neoplasm incidence rate. Moreover, effective treatment, particularly for distant metastasis, is scarce. Surgery is the preferred choice of treatment, whether in the primary or transferred region. We used 125I radioactive bead local implantation for the recurrence of MCA and yielded satisfactory results, taking into account the limited period. While the primary lesion is controlled effectively, the predisposing area for the metastasis should be carefully monitored. Image examination should be used for the neck dissection when any subtle changes showing cervical lymph node metastasis are noted. Due to the high occurrence of distant metastasis, an examination of the lungs or other organs should be conducted upon diagnosis of myoepithelial carcinoma. In conclusion, postoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy may help to prevent metastasis and recurrence (1).

References