HSulf-1 suppresses cell growth and down-regulates Hedgehog signaling in human gastric cancer cells

Introduction

Gastric cancer is the second most malignant type of cancer worldwide. It is often diagnosed at a late stage, and despite the current regimen of surgical, chemo-, radio- and other adjuvant therapies, gastric cancer has a poor prognosis with a 5-year survival rate of less than 20–25% in the USA, Europe and China (1). This has galvanized efforts to identify new therapeutic targets for treating this lethal disease.

Emerging evidence revealed that gastric cancer results from a combination of factors, including Helicobacter pylori-induced inflammation and deregulation of the Wnt and Hedgehog signaling pathways (2–4). The Hedgehog (Hh) family of proteins controls multiple cellular functions, including cell growth, survival and outcome, as well as body patterning and organ morphogenesis (5). Deregulated Hh pathway activation plays a role in various types of cancer including glioma, basal cell carcinoma, medulloblastoma, lung, breast, pancreatic and gastric cancers (6–8). Hh signaling is controlled by two transmembrane proteins, Patched (Ptch1) and Smoothened (SMO). In the absence of the Hh ligand, PTCH1 inhibits SMO, causing cleavage of GLI1 to the N-terminal repressor form. Once Hh binds to PTCH1, the inhibitory effect on SMO is released, causing active full-length GLI1 to transport into the nucleus and activate transcription of the Hh target genes, including GLI1, PTCH1, HHIP and C-MYC (9–11).

Human sulfatase-1 (HSulf-1) has emerged as a negative regulator of Hh signaling. It disrupts the distribution of the Hh morphogen and Hh signaling transduction by desulfating cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) (12–14). HSulf-1 was cloned as the first human ortholog of the developmentally regulated putative Quail sulfatase QSulf-1 (13) and was found to be downregulated in a number of cancer cells including ovarian, breast, renal tumor, hepatocellular carcinoma, myeloma and head and neck squamous carcinoma (15–21). HSulf-1 expression inhibited cancer cell growth, cell motility and invasion in multiple cancer cells, and promoted stress-induced apoptosis (15–17). Furthermore, HSulf-1 expression led to a reduction in vascular density and increased breast cancer cell apoptosis in xenografts, suggesting that HSulf-1 inhibits both angiogenesis and tumorigenesis in vivo (18,19). However, the role of HSulf-1 in gastric cancer tumorigenesis remains to be elucidated. Findings of our previous study demonstrated that the HSulf-1 expression is downregulated in gastric cancer cells, and that HSulf-1 gene silencing is associated with a high level of promoter hypermethylation (22).

In this study, we also investigated the function of HSulf-1 in gastric cancer cell proliferation. Expression of HSulf-1 in monoclonal MKN28 gastric cancer cells suppressed cell proliferation and colony formation. Notably, HSulf-1 inhibited GLI1-mediated transcription and the downregulated expression of Hh downstream target genes, including GLI1, PTCH1, C-MYC, CCND1 and BCL2. These data strongly support that HSulf-1 may inhibit gastric cancer cell proliferation by blocking the Hh pathway.

Materials and methods

Cell culture and establishment of HSulf-expressing monoclonal MKN28 stable cells

The human gastric cancer cell line MKN28 was obtained from the China Center for Type Culture Collection (Wuhan, China). Cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin (100 IU/ml) and streptomycin (100 μg/ml) in a humidified incubator at 37°C with a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Cells (1×104) were plated in 12-well plates one day prior to transfection. Monoclonal cells stably expressing HSulf-1 or empty vector were established following plasmid transfection and Geneticin (G418 sulfate) selection. The stable monoclonal cell lines were then cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 0.5 mg/ml G418. Cells were maintained at 37°C in a humid incubator with 5% CO2.

Quantitative real-time PCR (RT-PCR)

RNA extraction and RT-PCR were performed as previously described (22). The primer sequences were as follows: 18S rRNA, 5′-CAGCCA CCCGAGATTGAGCA-3′ (forward) and 5′-TAGTAGCGACG GGCGGTGTG-3′ (reverse); HSulf-1, 5′-ACTGTACCAATCG GCCAGAG-3′ (forward) and 5′-CCTCCTTGAATGGGTGA AGA-3′ (reverse). Semi-quantitative RT-PCR was used to examine the expression levels of Hh downstream target genes. The primers used are shown in Table I. The procedure was performed as described in a previous study (22).

Table I Primers for semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis.

Table I

Primers for semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis.

Gene name	Primer sequences (5′-3′)	Amplicon size (bp)
GLI1	5′-TACTCACGCCTCGAAAACCT-3′ (forward) 5′-GTCTGCTTTCCTCCCTGATG-3′ (reverse)	352
PTCH1	5′-ATGCTGGCGGGATCTGAGTTCGACT-3′ (forward) 5′-GGGTGTGGGCAGGCGGTTCAAG-3′ (reverse)	174
PTCH2	5′-GATGTGCTCTGCTGCTTCTCCA-3′ (forward) 5′-CTGCCTTCTGCCTTGTCTCCTC-3′ (reverse)	283
HHIP	5′-GCCTCGCATTCCATCCCAATTAC-3′ (forward) 5′-ACCCATCCATTTCTTCCATATCATCC-3′ (reverse)	297
C-MYC	5′-TTCGGGTAGTGGAAAACCAG-3′ (forward) 5′-CAGCAGCTCGAATTTCTTCC-3′ (reverse)	203
MYCN	5′-CATCCACCAGCAGCACAACTAT-3′ (forward) 5′-CTCAAGCTCTTAGCCTTTGGGG-3′ (reverse)	138
CCND1	5′-AGCTCCTGTGCTGCGAAGTGGAAAC-3′ (forward) 5′-AGTGTTCAATGAAATCGTGCGGGGT-3′ (reverse)	480
FOXF1	5′-GCCGTATCTGCACCAGAACA-3′ (forward) 5′-CGTTGAAAGAGAAGACAAACTCCTT-3′ (reverse)	116
FOXM1	5′-GGAGCAGCGACAGGTTAAGG-3′ (forward) 5′-GTCGTGCAGGGAAAGGTTGT-3′ (reverse)	244
BCL2	5′-TTTGAGTTCGGTGGGGTCAT-3′ (forward) 5′-TGACTTCACTTGTGGCCCAG-3′ (reverse)	275
18S rRNA	5′-CAGCCACCCGAGATTGAGCA-3′ (forward) 5′-TAGTAGCGACGGGCGGTGTG-3′ (reverse)	254

Immunoblotting

For total cell lysates, the cell pellet was resuspended in RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate and 0.1% SDS), mixed with protease inhibitors and vortexed for 5 sec. Following incubation on ice for 15 min, the suspension was centrifuged at 14,000 rpm at 4°C for 5 min and the supernatant was collected for immunoblotting. Total cell lysates (20 μg) were subjected to SDS-PAGE and transferred to a PVDF membrane (GE Healthcare, Chalfont, UK). The membrane was blocked by 5% milk for 2 h and incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C, followed by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) and Super Signal West Pico reagent (Pierce). The primary antibodies included anti-HSulf-1 (1:250; Abnova Corp., Walnut, CA, USA) and anti-β-actin (1:5000; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).

Cell proliferation assay

Cell growth rates were determined by a CellTiter 96® AQueous non-radioactive cell proliferation assay kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Briefly, the stable cell lines were plated into 96-well tissue culture plates at 5×102 cells/well. After the cells were cultured for a number of days as indicated, MTS solutions were added to the medium and incubated for 1.5 h at 37°C. The absorbance at 490 nm was measured using a microplate reader model 680 (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and the normalized absorbance was plotted against culture time to determine the number of viable cells.

Colony formation assay

The stable cells expressing empty vector or HSulf-1 were seeded in triplicate in 100-mm dishes at 1×103 cells/dish. Fresh medium containing 0.5 mg/ml G418 was changed every 3–4 days. After being cultured for 2–3 weeks, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min, washed with PBS several times, stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 20 min and photographed. Clones with more than 50 cells were counted.

Luciferase reporter assay

MKN28 cells at a density of 5×103 cells/well were seeded into 24-well plates prior to transfection. 8xGli-BS or 8xmutGli-BS luciferase reporter plasmid was co-transfected with 20 ng TK-Renilla (pRL-TK) (Promega) internal control plasmid and DNA expression vectors as indicated. After cells were cultured for 48 h, the luciferase activity was measured by the Dual-Glo Luciferase Assay System (Promega). The ratio between firefly luciferase activity (8xGli or Mut Gli) and renilla activity was calculated to assess the Gli transcriptional activity.

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as the standard error of the mean (SEM) unless specifically indicated otherwise. The student’s t-test was used for statistical analysis of the data. P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Establishment of a monoclonal MKN28-HSulf-1 stable cell line

To investigate the role of HSulf-1 in gastric cancer, we first established a gastric cell line that was able to stably express HSulf-1. As previously reported, endogenous HSulf-1 was downregulated in a number of gastric cancer cell lines including MKN28 (22). We therefore transfected pcDNA3.1/Myc-His(-)HSulf-1 or an empty vector plasmid, pcDNA3.1/Myc-His(-), into this cell line. Following G418 selection the monoclonal MKN28-HSulf-1 cell line was established, which expressed a significantly higher amount of HSulf-1 mRNA and protein than the empty vector control (Ctrl) as verified by both quantitative real-time RT-PCR (Fig. 1A) and immunoblotting (Fig. 1B). The results shown in Fig. 1 are representative of at least three independent experiments with similar results.

Figure 1 Expression of HSulf-1 in stable-transfected MKN28 cells. (A) Quantitative RT-PCR showing the expression of HSulf-1 mRNA in MKN28-HSulf-1 stable cells (HSulf-1) and the empty vector control cells (Ctrl). (B) Immunoblotting showing the HSulf-1 protein expression in MKN28-HSulf-1 cells (lane 2) vs. the empty vector control (lane 1). ***p<0.001 (Student’s t-test). Error bars, ± SD. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments with similar results.

HSulf-1 expression inhibits gastric cancer cell proliferation

To determine the effect of HSulf-1 expression on gastric cancer cell proliferation, a MTS assay and a clone formation assay were utilized. Compared with control cells, HSulf-1-expressing monoclonal MKN28 cells showed a significantly reduced growth rate starting from day 4 (Fig. 2A). HSulf-1-expressing MKN28 cells also formed many fewer colonies, as shown in the colony formation assay (Fig. 2B). These data indicated that HSulf-1 expression may significantly suppress the growth and proliferation of MKN28 gastric cancer cells, consistent with previous studies showing that HSulf-1 inhibits the growth of a number of tumors, including ovarian, breast, myeloma and hepatocellular carcinoma cells (15–21). Data shown in Fig. 2 are representative of three independent experiments with similar results.

Figure 2 Effects of HSulf-1 on cell proliferation in gastric cancer cells. (A) Growth curves of MKN28-HSulf-1 (▴) and empty vector control (■) cells by MTS assay. Values are the mean ± SD of four independent experiments. (B) Quantification of colony formation assay of MKN28-HSulf-1 and empty vector control cells performed in triplicate in three independent experiments. *p<0.05, ***p<0.001 (Student’s t-test). Error bars represent ± SD.

HSulf-1 is capable of inhibiting the Hh signaling pathway

HSulf-1 has emerged as a negative regulator of Hh signaling through the disruption of Hh signaling transduction by desulfating HSPG (17–19). Therefore, we investigated the effect of HSulf-1 on Hh signaling. Hh pathway activation was evaluated by a Gli luciferase reporter assay and semi-quantitative RT-PCR for Hh target genes. 8xGli luciferase reporter activity was significantly elevated in MKN28 cells as compared to mutant Gli reporter (Mut Gli)-transfected cells, indicating that the Hh pathway is activated in MKN28 cells (Fig. 3A). Notably, the introduction of HSulf-1 significantly inhibited 8xGli reporter activity (Fig. 3A, HSulf-1 vs. Ctrl), suggesting that HSulf-1 downregulates Hh signaling. Furthermore, HSulf-1 significantly downregulated the expression of Hh pathway target genes, including GLI1, PTCH1, PTCH2, HHIP, C-MYC, CCND1, FOXF1, FOXM1 and BCL2 (Fig. 3B). Taken together, these results markedly support that the expression of HSulf-1 is capable of downregulating Hh signaling, correlating with its growth inhibition in gastric cancer cells. The data shown in Fig. 3 represent three independent experiments with similar results.

Figure 3 Effects of HSulf-1 on the Hh signaling pathway. (A) 8xGli luciferase reporter assay in HSulf-1 or empty vector (Ctrl)-transfected MKN28 cells. Mutant Gli reporter (Mut Gli) served as a control. ***p<0.001 (Student’s t-test). Error bars, ± SD. (B) Semi-quantitative RT-PCR showing effects of HSulf-1 on mRNA expression of Hh target genes. 18S rRNA served as a control. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments with similar results.

Discussion

In this study, HSulf-1 was found to play a significant role in suppressing the growth and proliferation of gastric cancer in MKN28 cells. Furthermore, it was determined that HSulf-1 expression in gastric cancer cells may significantly inhibit the Hh signaling pathway, providing new mechanistic insight into HSulf-1-mediated growth inhibition in gastric cancer.

Emerging evidence revealed that HSulf-1 may function as a novel tumor suppressor in various types of cancer (15–21). It was recently reported that HSulf-1 is downregulated in several types of tumors including ovarian, breast, hepatocellular carcinoma, renal tumor cells and head and neck squamous carcinoma cells (15–21). Re-expression of HSulf-1 in ovarian, hepatocellular carcinoma or head and neck squamous carcinoma cells retarded cell proliferation and motility, and enhanced stress-induced apoptosis (15–17,20). More significantly, HSulf-1 expression in breast, myeloma or hepatocelluar carcinoma cell-derived xenografts blocked angiogenesis and tumor invasion in vivo (18,19). Notably, HSulf-1 is upregulated in primary pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and overexpression of HSulf-1 reduced growth capacity but increased invasiveness in pancreatic cancer (23,24). These studies suggested that HSulf-1 may play various roles in various types of cancer. Whether or not HSulf-1 plays a role in gastric cancer tumorigenicity remains to be elucidated. Our previous study suggested that HSulf-1 expression is downregulated in gastric cancer cells and that the gene silencing of HSulf-1 is associated with promoter hypermethylation (22). In the present study, we investigated whether HSulf-1 regulates the proliferation and growth of gastric cancer cells. HSulf-1 expression in MKN28 gastric cancer cells was found to markedly suppress cell proliferation and growth (Fig. 2A-B), consistent with previous studies, which revealed that HSulf-1 inhibits the proliferation of multiple types of cancer cells (15–21).

As a newly identified member of the endosulfatase family, HSulf-1 selectively desulfates cell surface HSPGs (12–14). Sulfated HSPGs play a pivotal role in mediating Wnt and Hh ligand distribution, stability and ligand-receptor binding (12,14,25). Therefore, desulfation by HSulf-1 re-expression may interfere with Wnt and Hh signaling (14,25). Sulfated HSPGs also serve as co-receptors for multiple growth factors and cytokines. Thus, desulfation by HSulf-1 leads to the abrogation of several receptor tyrosine kinase signaling pathways, particularly heparin-binding growth factors including fibroblast growth factor 2, vascular endothelial growth factor, hepatocyte growth factor, PDGF and heparin-binding epidermal growth factor (15–18). Since aberrant Hh activation has been shown to play a role in the tumorigenesis of multiple cancers, including gastric cancer (6–8), and Hh signaling regulates cell growth and survival, we explored the hypothesis that HSulf-1 regulates the activity of Hh signaling in gastric cancer cells. Notably, the activated Gli transcription activity in MKN28 gastric cancer cells was eliminated by HSulf-1 expression (Fig. 3A), indicating that HSulf-1 may abrogate Hh signaling activity in gastric cancer. Furthermore, we examined the effect of HSulf-1 on the expression of Hh pathway target genes and observed the significant downregulation of GLI1, PTCH1, PTCH2, HHIP, C-MYC, CCND1, FOXF1, FOXM1 and BCL2 (Fig. 3B). As Hh target genes, GLI1, PTCH1/2 and HHIP are responsible for the fine-tuning of Hh signaling via positive and negative feedback loops (10,11,26–28). The Hh pathway induces cell proliferation through upregulation of C-MYC, cell cycle regulator CCND1 and FOXM1, and promotes survival of cells via BCL2 (28–31). Collectively, the data confirmed that inhibition of Hh signaling may be one of the major mechanisms mediating HSulf-1-induced growth inhibition in gastric cancer cells. However, the results do not exclude the possibility that HSulf-1 may mediate its growth inhibition via multiple mechanisms including modulation of the Wnt and heparin-binding growth factor signaling pathways.

In conclusion, we demonstrated that HSulf-1 may function as a tumor suppressor in gastric cancer, as it significantly retarded cell growth and downregulated the Hh signaling pathway in gastric cancer cells. Since HSulf-1 potentiates the effects of histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors (32), and its epigenetic silencing in ovarian cancer is implicated in chemoresistance (33), strategies targeting the epigenetic reactivation of HSulf-1 in combination with HDAC inhibitors may prove to be useful therapeutic modalities in treating gastric cancer (34).

Acknowledgements

This study was partially supported by funds from the National Key Basic Research Project (No. 2007CB914401), the National Key Basic Research and Development (973) Program of China (No. 06CB503905) and the China Natural Science Foundation (No. 30770475).

References