Dasatinib inhibits primary melanoma cell proliferation through morphology‑dependent disruption of Src‑ERK signaling

  • Authors:
    • Jianghong Wu
    • Xin Liao
    • Bo Yu
    • Bing Su
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: December 10, 2012     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2012.1066
  • Pages: 527-532
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

New strategies for the treatment of advanced melanoma are urgently required. The RAS/RAF/MAPK pathway and c‑Src are deregulated in the majority of malignant melanomas, suggesting that they may interact functionally and are involved in the development and progression of the malignancy. Preclinical studies have demonstrated variable inhibition of melanoma cell growth by dasatinib in vitro. Src may act through different downstream signaling pathways. In the present study, we demonstrate that dasatinib induces changes in cell morphology, characterized by an arborized and contracted appearance, and accompanied by a reduction in cell proliferation in primary melanoma cells. This morphological change is demonstrated to be associated with the inhibition of nuclear translocation of activated ERK1/2. Together, these results indicate that Src may promote cell proliferation through the activation of the ERK signaling pathway in melanoma oncogenesis.

Introduction

The incidence of malignant melanoma has increased markedly over the past three decades, more rapidly than any other solid malignancy. Standard of care chemotherapeutic agents, such as dacarbazine and temozolomide, yield poor response rates of <20% (1). Therefore, new strategies for the treatment of advanced melanoma are urgently required.

Src tyrosine kinase family (SFK) members are known to be overexpressed and/or activated in many primary types of human cancer, typically through the mutational activation of upstream growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases (2). Increased protein levels and kinase activities of SFK have also been observed in melanoma (3,4). Dasatinib is a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that was initially isolated as a dual Src/ABL inhibitor (5), which has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for imatinib-resistant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treatment (6,7). An abundance of studies support the anti-tumor effects of dasatinib in cancer prevention and treatment, including those concerned with triple-negative breast (810), gastric (11), pancreatic (12), head and neck and lung cancer cell lines (13), as well as with myeloid leukemia (14).

However, preclinical studies have demonstrated variable inhibition of melanoma cell growth by dasatinib in vitro. Eustace et al identified an IC50 value in the nanomolar range in only one out of five cell lines (15), Homsi et al demonstrated variable sensitivity in three cell lines (4), Buettner et al revealed little to no effect on viability (16) and Kluger et al demonstrated that two out of eight melanoma cell lines used in the study were growth inhibited by concentrations <300 nM, whereas the other six were significantly more resistant (17). Src may act through different downstream signaling pathways. Hence, the underlying regulatory mechanisms for the discrepancies in the antiproliferative effects require investigation.

The RAS/RAF/MAPK pathway is deregulated in >90% of malignant melanomas. MAPK activation is crucial for the development of melanocytic neoplasia, and a constitutive activation of this pathway has been associated with numerous types of cancer (18,19). Notably, Maat et al demonstrated a reduction in ERK1/2 activation in metastatic cell lines compared with that of primary uveal melanoma (UM) cell lines, and Src kinase was involved in the ERK1/2 activation (20). This suggests that Src may be involved by regulating the ERK signaling pathway in melanoma oncogenesis.

In the present study, we demonstrate that dasatinib induces changes in cell morphology, characterized by an arborized and contracted appearance, and accompanied by a reduction in cell proliferation in primary melanoma cells. This morphological change is associated with the restriction of ERK1/2 activity in the cytoplasmic compartment.

Materials and methods

Antibodies and reagents

The following primary antibodies (Ab) were used: Rabbit polyclonal antibody specific for GAPDH (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA); Src, phospho-SrcTyr416, phospho-ERK1/2Thr202/Tyr204 and ERK1/2 (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Beverly, MA, USA). Dasatinib was a gift from Dr Irwin Gelman (Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA). The MEK1/2 inhibitor (U0126) was purchased from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA, USA).

Cell culture

Melanoma cells were derived from primary melanoma known as Mel-p. The metastatic melanoma cell line A375 was obtained from the Typical Cell Culture Collection Committee of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s media (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS).

MTT assay

Cells (1,000 cells/well; 96-well plate) were incubated overnight at 37°C in 5% CO2, in media with 10% FBS. The following day, cells were treated with either a vehicle control (dimethylsulfoxide, DMSO) or varying concentrations of dasatinib/U0126, and allowed to grow for an additional 72 h. After 72 h, cell numbers were assessed by an MTT assay; 20 μl of 5 mg/ml MTT was added to each well. Subsequently, the plate was incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 4–5 h. The medium was then removed and 150 μl of DMSO was added. The plate was then incubated in the same conditions as previously for 5 min. Proliferation was quantified by a plate reader at optical density (OD) of 570 nm. The cell growth inhibition was calculated as (T–T0)/(C–T0) × 100 (T, OD of the test well on exposure to the test drug; C, OD of the vehicle control well; T0, OD at time zero). The cell growth inhibition curve was generated by plotting cell growth inhibition against drug concentration, and IG50 was determined using GraphPad Prism 5 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA).

Cell morphology

Mel-p and A375 cells were plated overnight in 6-well dishes in the presence or absence of dasatinib (30 nM) or U0126 (10 μM). The plates were photographed digitally using a phase-contrast microscope.

Immunofluorescence analysis

Melanoma cells were plated on glass coverslips and treated with DMSO or 30 nM dasatinib for 24 h, and then washed twice with PBS. The cells were then fixed with 60% acetone/3.7% formaldehyde at −20°C for 20 min, and blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. Actin filaments were stained with rhodamine-labeled phalloidin (1:500; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and nuclei were stained with DAPI (1:500; Invitrogen Life Technologies; Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 1 h. Fluorescent images were captured using an Olympus inverted microscope equipped with a Roper CoolSnap HQ CCD camera (Metronet Technology Ltd. (Guangzhou, China). For p-ERK1/2 staining, melanoma cells were plated on glass coverslips and treated with DMSO or 30 nM dasatinib for 24 h, and serum-starved overnight by incubation with serum-free DMEM. The cells were stimulated with 10% FBS in DMEM at the times indicated in the specific figure legends and were immediately fixed with 60% acetone/3.7% formaldehyde at −20°C, following the procedure described previously.

Western blot analysis

Cells grown in the presence or absence of dasatinib or U0126 at the indicated concentration were plated in 10-cm dishes and incubated with regular DMEM overnight, then lysed in RIPA buffer. Proteins (40 μg per sample) were separated by SDS-PAGE, blotted onto PVDF membranes that were blocked for 1 h with 5% BSA in 1X Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween-20 (TBST) and then probed as described. Digital imaging and signal quantification were performed using the Chemi-Genius2 Bio-Imager (Syngene, Frederick, MD, USA) using GeneTools software.

Results and Discussion

Dasatinib differentially inhibits cell growth in melanoma cell lines

Previous studies have demonstrated variable sensitivity to dasatinib in different melanoma cells. Recently, Maat et al(20) demonstrated that inhibition of Src led to the growth reduction of primary uveal melanoma cultures and cell lines, whereas metastatic cell line growth was only slightly reduced. It was suggested that Src may be involved in the initiation of melanoma oncogenesis. To test this hypothesis, two melanoma cell lines (Mel-p, primary melanoma cells and A375, metastatic melanoma cells) were examined for their sensitivity to dasatinib in vitro using an MTT assay. The IC50 values were calculated, following treatment with dasatinib for 72 h. Mel-p cells demonstrated robust growth inhibition with an IC50 value of 18.02 nM. Consistent with a previous study (4), A375 cells were less responsive with an IC50 of 762.4 nM. These results demonstrate that the inhibition of Src by dasatinib leads to the growth inhibition of primary melanoma cells.

Dasatinib induces cell differentiation and remodels the actin cytoskeleton in Mel-p cells

Notably, we observed that dasatinib treatment induced changes in the morphology of Mel-p cells, which normally present as flattened and extended cells. Upon dasatinib treatment at a concentration of 30 nM, the cells displayed a markedly different morphology that was characterized by an arborized and contracted appearance (Fig. 1B), which is recognized as a morphological indication of melanoma cell differentiation (21). The percentage of arborized cells following treatment with dasatinib (30 nM) overnight was counted. The results revealed that 70.2% of dasatinib-treated Mel-p cells were arborized in comparison to the control cells (2%). By contrast, no morphological changes were observed in the A375 cells treated with 30 nM of dasatinib (Fig. 1B), while only minor morphological changes were observed in the A375 cells treated with a higher concentration of dasatinib (≥200 nM) that clearly inhibited Src activation (Fig. 1D). These results suggest that Src differentially regulates melanoma cell morphology.

We further studied whether the remodeling of cytoskeletal components, such as microfilaments, was involved in the formation of dendrites in Mel-p cells. As demonstrated in Fig. 1C, in untreated Mel-p cells, actin was organized in stress fibers crossing the cytoplasm. Following treatment with 30 nM dasatinib for 24 h, the actin cytoskeletal structure was disrupted, creating a dense and compact cell body. This suggests that inhibition of cell proliferation by dasatinib is associated with changes in cell shape. Certain fundamental cellular processes (cell growth and differentiation) are profoundly influenced by cell shape and substrate adhesion/cell spreading (22,23).

U0126 inhibits the proliferation of Mel-p cells

Cell shape perturbation, particularly that induced by cytoskeleton-disrupting drugs, alters the activity of specific signaling intermediates (24). Moreover, drug-initiated alterations in both the microfilament and microtubule networks also mobilize intracellular signaling elements and activate the ERK, JNK and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) (25,26). In a number of mammalian cell types, the Ras/MAPK cascade is the principal mitogenic signaling pathway and MAPK activation is essential for cell growth (27). Alesiani et al demonstrated that downregulation of the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway sensitizes melanoma cells to 5,7-dimethoxycoumarin treatment, accompanied by morphological changes including dendrite outgrowth (28).

To address whether there is an association between Src, MAPK and the actin cytoskeleton, the effect of ERK on cell proliferation and morphology was subsequently investigated. Treatment with the MEK inhibitor, U0126, resulted in a significant decrease in cell proliferation in Mel-p cells compared with vehicle control-treated cells. The IC50 value following a 72-h treatment was calculated (Fig. 2A). However, 20 μM U0126 did not significantly decrease the growth of A375 cells. This result indicates that inhibition of primary melanoma cell growth by dasatinib may be associated with the activation of ERK. We demonstrated that ERK activity was significantly inhibited in Mel-p cell lines following treatment with the MEK inhibitor, U0126 (Fig. 2B). By contrast, U0126 exhibited almost no effect on cell morphology and the cytoskeleton. Notably, U0126 induced a level of cell rounding in Mel-p cells similar to that induced by dasatinib treatment (Fig. 2C). This suggests that part of the cytoskeletal remodeling induced by dasatinib is due to the inhibition of MEK activation.

Dasatinib inhibits nuclear translocation of ERK signaling in Mel-p

Maat et al identified Src to be a crucial upstream tyrosine kinase for ERK1/2 activation in primary uveal melanoma (20), suggesting that Src-ERK1/2 signaling may be important for primary melanoma growth. A previous study confirmed the contribution of c-Src to cell shape-dependent ERK1/2 activation (29). It is also well known that growth stimulation by v-Src requires the activation of MEK/ERK signaling (30). Elements of the Ras/Raf/MAPK cascade associate with a microfilament-linked signaling ‘particle’, suggesting a cell structural basis for MAPK activation (31,32). v-Src-induced loss of stress fibers and morphological transformation have been demonstrated previously (33).

Furthermore, the effects of dasatinib on Src-ERK signaling were evaluated in Mel-p cell lines in the present study. Dasatinib caused complete or near-complete inhibition of Src activity, as measured by phosphorylation at Y416 in western blot analysis following treatment overnight with concentrations ≥30 nM (Fig. 1D). However, no significant change in ERK phosphorylation was observed with dasatinib treatment (Fig. 3A), suggesting that ERK activation is not associated with Src inhibition.

Smith et al demonstrated that retinoic acid-induced differentiation of F9 cells results in uncoupling of MAPK activation and c-Fos expression (34). It was of interest to determine whether a similar regulation of the MAPK pathway occurs in Mel-p cells treated with dasatinib. To confirm that dasatinib-induced differentiation alters MAPK nucleo-cytoplasmic localization, activated pERK1/2 localization using indirect immunofluorescence microscopy was examined in the current study. In untreated cells, pERK1/2 was detectable in the nuclei within 5 min, reaching a maximum by 30 min and remaining visible 30–60 min after serum addition (Fig. 3B, upper panel). In dasatinib-treated cells, activated ERK1/2 was readily detected within 5 min (data not shown). However, the pattern of pERK1/2 cellular distribution was markedly different between untreated and treated cells. In dasatinib-treated cells, pERK1/2 was mainly distributed in the cytoplasm following serum addition (Fig. 3B, lower panel). Thus, nuclear translocation of activated pERK1/2 is impaired in dasatinib-treated cells, suggesting that dasatinib disrupts ERK1/2 signaling.

Conclusions

Dasatinib has been demonstrated to be a differentiation-inducing compound in human multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (35) and megakaryocytes (36). In the present study, we have demonstrated that dasatinib induces morphological (abored formation) differentiation in Mel-p cells. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain the reduction in cell proliferation and impaired growth factor responsiveness that accompany differentiation. This study indicates that dasatinib induces differentiation and uncouples MAPK activation by suppressing the nuclear translocation of activated MAPK.

Abbreviations:

SFK

Src tyrosine kinase family;

CML

chronic myelogenous leukemia;

ALL

acute lymphoblastic leukemia;

UM

uveal melanoma;

DMEM

Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium;

FBS

fetal bovine serum;

BSA

bovine serum albumin;

MAPKs

mitogen-activated protein kinases

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Research Grants of Shenzhen Science and Technology Project (ZYA201106080030A). The authors would like to thank Shenzhen Biomedical Research Support Platform and Shenzhen Public Service Platform for Molecular Diagnosis of Dermatology for their technical assistance.

References

1. 

Gogas HJ, Kirkwood JM and Sondak VK: Chemotherapy for metastatic melanoma: time for a change? Cancer. 109:455–464. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2. 

Frame MC: Newest findings on the oldest oncogene; how activated src does it. J Cell Sci. 117:989–998. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3. 

Homsi J, Cubitt C and Daud A: The Src signaling pathway: a potential target in melanoma and other malignancies. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 11:91–100. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4. 

Homsi J, Cubitt CL, Zhang S, Munster PN, Yu H, Sullivan DM, Jove R, Messina JL and Daud AI: Src activation in melanoma and Src inhibitors as therapeutic agents in melanoma. Melanoma Res. 19:167–175. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5. 

Lombardo LJ, Lee FY, Chen P, Norris D, Barrish JC, Behnia K, Castaneda S, Cornelius LA, Das J, Doweyko AM, Fairchild C, et al: Discovery of N-(2-chloro-6-methyl- phenyl)-2-(6-(4-(2-hydroxyethyl)- piperazin-1-yl)-2-methylpyrimidin-4- ylamino) thiazole-5-carboxamide (BMS-354825), a dual Src/Abl kinase inhibitor with potent antitumor activity in preclinical assays. J Med Chem. 47:6658–6661. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar

6. 

Steinberg M: Dasatinib: a tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia and philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Clin Ther. 29:2289–2308. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

7. 

Talpaz M, Shah NP, Kantarjian H, Donato N, Nicoll J, Paquette R, Cortes J, O’Brien S, Nicaise C, Bleickardt E, Blackwood-Chirchir MA, Iyer V, Chen TT, Huang F, Decillis AP and Sawyers CL: Dasatinib in imatinib-resistant Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias. N Engl J Med. 354:2531–2541. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8. 

Finn RS, Dering J, Ginther C, Wilson CA, Glaspy P, Tchekmedyian N and Slamon DJ: Dasatinib, an orally active small molecule inhibitor of both the src and abl kinases, selectively inhibits growth of basal-type/‘triple-negative’ breast cancer cell lines growing in vitro. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 105:319–326. 2007.PubMed/NCBI

9. 

Pichot CS, Hartig SM, Xia L, Arvanitis C, Monisvais D, Lee FY, Frost JA and Corey SJ: Dasatinib synergizes with doxorubicin to block growth, migration, and invasion of breast cancer cells. Br J Cancer. 101:38–47. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10. 

Nautiyal J, Majumder P, Patel BB, Lee FY and Majumdar AP: Src inhibitor dasatinib inhibits growth of breast cancer cells by modulating EGFR signaling. Cancer Lett. 283:143–151. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11. 

Okamoto W, Okamoto I, Yoshida T, Okamoto K, Takezawa K, Hatashita E, Yamada Y, Kuwata K, Arao T, Yanagihara K, Fukuoka M, Nishio K and Nakagawa K: Identification of c-Src as a potential therapeutic target for gastric cancer and of MET activation as a cause of resistance to c-Src inhibition. Mol Cancer Ther. 9:1188–1197. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12. 

Nagaraj NS, Smith JJ, Revetta F, Washington MK and Merchant NB: Targeted inhibition of SRC kinase signaling attenuates pancreatic tumorigenesis. Mol Cancer Ther. 9:2322–2332. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13. 

Johnson FM, Saigal B, Talpaz M and Donato NJ: Dasatinib (BMS-354825) tyrosine kinase inhibitor suppresses invasion and induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and non-small cell lung cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res. 11:6924–6932. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14. 

Guerrouahen BS, Futami M, Vaklavas C, Kanerva J, Whichard ZL, Nwawka K, Blanchard EG, Lee FY, Robinson LJ, Arceci R, Kornblau SM, Wieder E, Cayre YE and Corey SJ: Dasatinib inhibits the growth of molecularly heterogeneous myeloid leukemias. Clin Cancer Res. 16:1149–1158. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15. 

Eustace AJ, Crown J, Clynes M and O’Donovan N: Preclinical evaluation of dasatinib, a potent Src kinase inhibitor, in melanoma cell lines. J Transl Med. 6:532008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16. 

Buettner R, Mesa T, Vultur A, Lee F and Jove R: Inhibition of Src family kinases with dasatinib blocks migration and invasion of human melanoma cells. Mol Cancer Res. 6:1766–1774. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17. 

Kluger HM, Dudek AZ, McCann C, Ritacco J, Southard N, Jilaveanu LB, Molinaro A and Sznol M: A phase 2 trial of dasatinib in advanced melanoma. Cancer. 117:2202–2208. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18. 

Goding CR: Mitf from neural crest to melanoma: signal transduction and transcription in the melanocyte lineage. Genes Dev. 14:1712–1728. 2000.PubMed/NCBI

19. 

Reddy KB, Nabha SM and Atanaskova N: Role of MAP kinase in tumor progression and invasion. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 22:395–403. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20. 

Maat W, el Filali M, Dirks-Mulder A, Luyten GP, Gruis NA, Desjardins L, Boender P, Jager MJ and van der Velden PA: Episodic Src activation in uveal melanoma revealed by kinase activity profiling. Br J Cancer. 101:312–319. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21. 

Busca R, Bertolotto C, Abbe P, Englaro W, Ishizaki T, Narumiya S, Boquet P, Ortonne JP and Ballotti R: Inhibition of Rho is required for cAMP-induced melanoma cell differentiation. Mol Biol Cell. 9:1367–1378. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22. 

Folkman J and Moscona A: Role of cell shape in growth control. Nature. 273:345–349. 1978. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23. 

Aplin AE and Juliano RL: Integrin and cytoskeletal regulation of growth factor signaling to the MAP kinase pathway. J Cell Sci. 112:695–706. 1999.PubMed/NCBI

24. 

Schmid-Alliana A, Menou L, Manie S, Schmid-Antomarchi H, Millet MA, Giuriato S, Ferrua B and Rossi B: Microtubule integrity regulates src-like and extracellular signal-regulated kinase activities in human pro-monocytic cells. Importance for interleukin-1 production. J Biol Chem. 273:3394–3400. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar

25. 

Irigoyen JP, Besser D and Nagamine Y: Cytoskeleton reorganization induces the urokinase-type plasminogen activator gene via the Ras/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling pathway. J Biol Chem. 272:1904–1909. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26. 

Rijken PJ, van Hal GJ, van der Heyden MA, Verkleij AJ and Boonstra J: Actin polymerization is required for negative feedback regulation of epidermal growth factor-induced signal transduction. Exp Cell Res. 243:254–262. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27. 

Brunet A, Roux D, Lenormand P, Dowd S, Keyse S and Pouyssegur J: Nuclear translocation of p42/p44 mitogen-activated protein kinase is required for growth factor-induced gene expression and cell cycle entry. EMBO J. 18:664–674. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28. 

Alesiani D, Cicconi R, Mattei M, Bei R and Canini A: Inhibition of Mek 1/2 kinase activity and stimulation of melanogenesis by 5,7-dimethoxycoumarin treatment of melanoma cells. Int J Oncol. 34:1727–1735. 2009.PubMed/NCBI

29. 

Samarakoon R and Higgins PJ: Pp60c-src mediates ERK activation/nuclear localization and PAI-1 gene expression in response to cellular deformation. J Cell Physiol. 195:411–420. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30. 

Riley D, Carragher NO, Frame MC and Wyke JA: The mechanism of cell cycle regulation by v-Src. Oncogene. 20:5941–5950. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31. 

Carothers Carraway CA, Fang H, Ye XH, Juang SH, Liu YC, Carvajal ME and Carraway KL: Membrane-microfilament interactions in ascites tumor cell microvilli. Identification and isolation of a large microfilament-associated membrane glycoprotein complex. J Biol Chem. 266:16238–16246. 1991.

32. 

Carraway CA, Carvajal ME and Carraway KL: Association of the Ras to mitogen-activated protein kinase signal transduction pathway with microfilaments. Evidence for a p185(neu)-containing cell surface signal transduction particle linking the mitogenic pathway to a membrane-microfilament association site. J Biol Chem. 274:25659–25667. 1999.

33. 

Fincham VJ, Chudleigh A and Frame MC: Regulation of p190 Rho-GAP by v-Src is linked to cytoskeletal disruption during transformation. J Cell Sci. 112:947–956. 1999.PubMed/NCBI

34. 

Smith ER, Smedberg JL, Rula ME, Hamilton TC and Xu XX: Disassociation of MAPK activation and c-Fos expression in F9 embryonic carcinoma cells following retinoic acid-induced endoderm differentiation. J Biol Chem. 276:32094–32100. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35. 

Borriello A, Caldarelli I, Basile MA, Bencivenga D, Tramontano A, Perrotta S, Della RF and Oliva A: The tyrosine kinase inhibitor dasatinib induces a marked adipogenic differentiation of human multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. PLoS One. 6:e285552011. View Article : Google Scholar

36. 

Mazharian A, Ghevaert C, Zhang L, Massberg S and Watson SP: Dasatinib enhances megakaryocyte differentiation but inhibits platelet formation. Blood. 117:5198–5206. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

February 2013
Volume 5 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Wu J, Liao X, Yu B and Su B: Dasatinib inhibits primary melanoma cell proliferation through morphology‑dependent disruption of Src‑ERK signaling. Oncol Lett 5: 527-532, 2013
APA
Wu, J., Liao, X., Yu, B., & Su, B. (2013). Dasatinib inhibits primary melanoma cell proliferation through morphology‑dependent disruption of Src‑ERK signaling. Oncology Letters, 5, 527-532. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2012.1066
MLA
Wu, J., Liao, X., Yu, B., Su, B."Dasatinib inhibits primary melanoma cell proliferation through morphology‑dependent disruption of Src‑ERK signaling". Oncology Letters 5.2 (2013): 527-532.
Chicago
Wu, J., Liao, X., Yu, B., Su, B."Dasatinib inhibits primary melanoma cell proliferation through morphology‑dependent disruption of Src‑ERK signaling". Oncology Letters 5, no. 2 (2013): 527-532. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2012.1066