Reduced expression of Snail decreases breast cancer cell motility by downregulating the expression and inhibiting the activity of RhoA GTPase

Zhang,Ali; Wang,Quansheng; Han,Zhiqiang; Hu,Wei; Xi,Ling; Gao,Qinlei; Wang,Shixuan; Zhou,Jianfeng; Xu,Gang; Meng,Li; Chen,Gang; Ma,Ding

doi:10.3892/ol.2013.1385

Reduced expression of Snail decreases breast cancer cell motility by downregulating the expression and inhibiting the activity of RhoA GTPase

Authors:
- Ali Zhang
- Quansheng Wang
- Zhiqiang Han
- Wei Hu
- Ling Xi
- Qinlei Gao
- Shixuan Wang
- Jianfeng Zhou
- Gang Xu
- Li Meng
- Gang Chen
- Ding Ma
View Affiliations

Affiliations: Cancer Biology Research Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430030, P.R. China, Department of Chinese Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430030, P.R. China, Department of Gynecologic Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
Published online on: June 7, 2013 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2013.1385
Pages: 339-346

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

Abstract

Several lines of evidence support an important role for Snail, a transcriptional factor, in breast cancer. Overexpression of Snail has been associated with breast cancer metastasis, although the specific role of Snail in the process remains unclear. To address this issue, the expression levels of Snail, RhoA and fibronectin, as well as MMP‑2, were reduced in the breast tumor cell lines MDA‑MB‑231 and MDA‑MB‑435S, and their biological responses were studied in vitro and in vivo. For the first time, it was observed that downregulated Snail expression is correlated with a significant inhibition of the expression and activity of RhoA GTPase, as well as MMP‑2. The present data provide evidence that Snail promotes tumor cell motility and angiogenesis which is mainly mediated through the regulation of RhoA activity. In conclusion, the present findings demonstrate a key regulatory role for Snail in breast tumor growth and progression.

View Figures

View References

1.	World Health Organization: Cancer: Fact Sheet No 297. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs297/en/. Accessed August 12, 2012.
2.	Thiery JP: Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in tumour progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2:442–454. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
3.	Jethwa P, Naqvi M, Hardy RG, et al: Overexpression of Slug is associated with malignant progression of esophageal adenocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 14:1044–1052. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
4.	Xiong H, Hong J, Du W, et al: Roles of STAT3 and ZEB1 in E-cadherin down-regulation and human colorectal cancer epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Biol Chem. 287:5813–5832. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
5.	Sakamoto K, Imanishi Y, Tomita T, et al: Overexpression of SIP1 and downregulation of E-cadherin predict delayed neck metastasis in stage I/II oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma after partial glossectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 19:612–619
6.	Baritaki S, Huerta-Yepez S, Sahakyan A, et al: Mechanisms of nitric oxide-mediated inhibition of EMT in cancer: inhibition of the metastasis-inducer Snail and induction of the metastasis-suppressor RKIP. Cell Cycle. 9:4931–4940. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
7.	Yin T, Wang C, Liu T, Zhao G, Zha Y and Yang M: Expression of snail in pancreatic cancer promotes metastasis and chemoresistance. J Surg Res. 141:196–203. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
8.	Côme C, Magnino F, Bibeau F, et al: Snail and slug play distinct roles during breast carcinoma progression. Clin Cancer Res. 12:5395–5402. 2006.PubMed/NCBI
9.	Jordà M, Olmeda D, Vinyals A, et al: Upregulation of MMP-9 in MDCK epithelial cell line in response to expression of the Snail transcription factor. J Cell Sci. 118:3371–3385. 2005.PubMed/NCBI
10.	Cheng CW, Wu PE, Yu JC, et al: Mechanisms of inactivation of E-cadherin in breast carcinoma: modification of the two-hit hypo- thesis of tumor suppressor gene. Oncogene. 20:3814–3823. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
11.	del Barrio M and Nieto M: Overexpression of Snail family members highlights their ability to promote chick neural crest formation. Development. 1583–1593. 2002.PubMed/NCBI
12.	Etienne-Manneville S and Hall A: Rho GTPases in cell biology. Nature. 420:629–635. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar
13.	Gou L, Wang W, Tong A, et al: Proteomic identification of RhoA as a potential biomarker for proliferation and metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Mol Med (Berl). 89:817–827. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
14.	Takami Y, Higashi M, Kumagai S, et al: The activity of RhoA is correlated with lymph node metastasis in human colorectal cancer. Dig Dis Sci. 53:467–473. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
15.	Sander EE, ten Klooster JP, van Delft S, van der Kammen R and Collard JG: Rac downregulates Rho activity: reciprocal balance between both GTPases determines cellular morphology and migratory behavior. J Cell Biol. 147:1009–1022. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar
16.	Martin TA, Goyal A, Watkins G and Jiang WG: Expression of the transcription factors snail, slug, and twist and their clinical significance in human breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 12:488–496. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
17.	Simpson K, Dugan AS and Mercurio AM: Functional analysis of the contribution of RhoA and RhoC GTPases to invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer Res. 64:8694–8701. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
18.	Rosman DS, Phukan S, Huang CC and Pasche B: TGFBR1*6A enhances the migration and invasion of MCF-7 breast cancer cells through RhoA activation. Cancer Res. 68:1319–1328. 2008.
19.	Kang Y and Massagué J: Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions: twist in development and metastasis. Cell. 118:277–279. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
20.	Tsutsumi S, Gupta SK, Hogan V, Collard JG and Raz A: Activation of small GTPase Rho is required for autocrine motility factor signaling. Cancer Res. 62:4484–4490. 2002.PubMed/NCBI
21.	Tester AM, Waltham M, Oh SJ, et al: Pro-matrix metalloproteinase-2 transfection increases orthotopic primary growth and experimental metastasis of MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells in nude mice. Cancer Res. 64:652–658. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar
22.	Olmeda D, Jordá M, Peinado H, Fabra A and Cano A: Snail silencing effectively suppresses tumour growth and invasiveness. Oncogene. 26:1862–1874. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
23.	Zhou J, Gao Q, Chen G, et al: Novel oncolytic adenovirus selectively targets tumor-associated polo-like kinase 1 and tumor cell viability. Clin Cancer Res. 11:8431–8440. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
24.	Carette JE, Overmeer RM, Schagen FH, et al: Conditionally replicating adenoviruses expressing short hairpin RNAs silence the expression of a target gene in cancer cells. Cancer Research. 64:2663–2667. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar