|
1.
|
Hensel K, Mienkina MP and Schmitz G:
Analysis of ultrasound fields in cell culture wells for in vitro
ultrasound therapy experiments. Ultrasound Med Biol. 37:2105–2115.
2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
2.
|
Husseini GA and Pitt WG: The use of
ultrasound and micelles in cancer treatment. J Nanosci Nanotechnol.
8:2205–2215. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3.
|
Casey G, Cashman JP, Morrissey D, et al:
Sonoporation mediated immunogene therapy of solid tumors.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 36:430–440. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4.
|
Qin S, Caskey CF and Ferrara KW:
Ultrasound contrast microbubbles in imaging and therapy: physical
principles and engineering. Phys Med Biol. 54:R27–R57. 2009.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5.
|
van Wamel A, Kooiman K, Harteveld M, et
al: Vibrating micro-bubbles poking individual cells: drug transfer
into cells via sonoporation. J Control Release. 112:149–155.
2006.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
6.
|
Ohl CD, Arora M, lkink R, de Jong N,
Versluis M, Delius M and Lohse D: Sonoporation from jetting
cavitation bubbles. Biophys J. 91:4285–4295. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
7.
|
Juffermans LJ, van Dijk A, Jongenelen CA,
Drukarch B, Reijerkerk A, de Vries HE, Kamp O and Musters RJ:
Ultrasound and microbubble-induced intra- and intercellular
bioeffects in primary endothelial cells. Ultrasound Med Biol.
35:1917–1927. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
8.
|
Hoskins P, Thrush A, Martin K and
Whittingam T: Diagnostic Ultrasound: Physics and Equipment. 2nd
Edition. Cambridge University Press; New York, NY: 2010
|
|
9.
|
Schlicher RK, Radhakrishna H, Tolentino
TP, Apkarian RP, Zarnitsyn V and Prausnitz MR: Mechanism of
intracellular delivery by acoustic cavitation. Ultrasound Med Biol.
32:915–924. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
10.
|
Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J and Ward E: Cancer
statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 60:277–300. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
11.
|
Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O and Jemal A:
Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic
and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J
Clin. 61:212–236. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
12.
|
Carles J, Castellano D, Climent MÁ, Maroto
P, Medina R and Alcaraz A: Castration-resistant metastatic prostate
cancer: current status and treatment possibilities. Clin Transl
Oncol. 14:169–176. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
13.
|
Mellott AJ, Forrest ML and Detamore MS:
Physical non-viral gene delivery methods for tissue engineering.
Ann Biomed Eng. 41:446–468. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
14.
|
Khanna S, Amso NN, Paynter SJ and Coakley
WT: Contrast agent bubble and erythrocyte behavior in a 1.5-MHz
standing ultrasound wave. Ultrasound Med Biol. 29:1463–1470. 2003.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
15.
|
Kinoshita M and Hynynen K: Key factors
that affect sonoporation efficiency in in vitro settings: the
importance of standing wave in sonoporation. Biochem Biophys Res
Commun. 359:860–865. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
16.
|
Rodamporn S, Harris NR, Beeby SP, Boltryk
RJ and Sanchez-Elsner T: HeLa cell transfection using a novel
sonoporation system. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 58:927–934. 2011.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
17.
|
Bai WK, Wu ZH, Shen E, Zhang JZ and Hu B:
The improvement of liposome-mediated transfection of pEGFP DNA into
human prostate cancer cells by combining low-frequency and
low-energy ultrasound with microbubbles. Oncol Rep. 27:475–480.
2012.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18.
|
Hao Q, Liu Q, Wang X, Wang P, Li T and
Tong WY: Membrane damage effect of therapeutic ultrasound on
Ehrlich ascitic tumor cells. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 24:41–48.
2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
19.
|
Lentacker I, Geers B, Demeester J, De
Smedt SC and Sanders NN: Design and evaluation of
doxorubicin-containing microbubbles for ultrasound-triggered
doxorubicin delivery: cytotoxicity and mechanisms involved. Mol
Ther. 18:101–108. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
20.
|
Sonoda S, Tachibana K, Uchino E, et al:
Inhibition of melanoma by ultrasound-microbubble-aided drug
delivery suggests membrane permeabilization. Cancer Biol Ther.
6:1276–1283. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
21.
|
Yoshida T, Kondo T, Ogawa R, et al:
Combination of doxorubicin and low-intensity ultrasound causes a
synergistic enhancement in cell killing and an additive enhancement
in apoptosis induction in human lymphoma U937 cells. Cancer
Chemother Pharmacol. 61:559–567. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
22.
|
Iwanaga K, Tominaga K, Yamamoto K, et al:
Local delivery system of cytotoxic agents to tumors by focused
sonoporation. Cancer Gene Ther. 14:354–363. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
23.
|
Maeda H, Tominaga K, Iwanaga K, et al:
Targeted drug delivery system for oral cancer therapy using
sonoporation. J Oral Pathol Med. 38:572–579. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
24.
|
Liu Y, Liu Z, Li T and Ye G: Ultrasonic
sonoporation can enhance the prostate permeability. Med Hypotheses.
74:449–451. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
