Correlation between the EGF gene intronic polymorphism, rs2298979, and colorectal cancer

  • Authors:
    • Vahid Chaleshi
    • Mahdi Montazer Haghighi
    • Sanaz Savabkar
    • Neda Zali
    • Mohsen Vahedi
    • Mahsa Khanyaghma
    • Gholam Reza Javadi
    • Hamid Asadzade
    • Mohammad Reza Zali
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: July 22, 2013     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2013.1481
  • Pages: 1079-1083
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is an important disorder that results from genetic and epigenetic alterations in one colonic epithelial cell. Epidermal growth factor (EGF) is critical in the development of tumors in epithelial tissues. Variations in the DNA sequence of the EGF gene may be particularly significant with regard to susceptibility to CRC. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of the EGF gene single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), rs2298979, on CRC. In this prospective study, 220 samples were collected from patients with CRC and compared with 220 matched healthy controls. Genotyping was performed using the polymerase chain reaction‑restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR‑RFLP) method, and the result was validated by direct sequencing. A significant correlation was observed between the rs2298979 variant in the EGF gene and CRC. The frequency of the A/G genotype in the control group was higher than in the patients with sporadic CRC [odds ratio (OR), 0.488; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.307‑0.774; P=0.002]. In this study there were no individuals with a G/G genotype. Although the frequency of the G and A alleles was similar in the healthy control and CRC patient groups, individuals with the A/G genotype were less susceptible to CRC compared with those with the A/A genotype.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) originates from one colonic epithelial cell due to an accumulation of genetic and epigenetic changes that lead to malignancy (1). The incidence of CRC has a varied distribution in the different geographical regions and a significant difference has been observed between developed and developing countries (2,3). A number of studies have shown show that CRC is becoming increasingly common in Asian countries (4,5,6). According to the statistics issued by the Iranian Ministry of Health, ~1,130 patients suffering from CRC succumbed in 2006, and there was no significant difference between the mortality rates of male and female patients (7). The causes of CRC may include genetic and environmental factors. Based on the observed molecular genetic alterations, it has been indicated that CRC is a heterogeneous disease (8). For the development of more appropriate diagnostic methods, there is a requirement for studies to identify new molecular markers in the affected populations. Epidermal growth factor (EGF) is one of the most important factors leading to the development of tumors and plays a significant role in the uncontrolled reproduction of cancerous cells (9). EGF is an important regulator of cell survival, and in numerous types of cancer, including breast, prostate, pancreas, colorectal, lung and head and neck, an increase in EGF and ErbB, a member of the EGF receptor family, has been demonstrated (1012). The EGF gene is located on chromosome 4q25–27 and produces various transcripts, the largest of which has 24 exons and 23 introns (12,13). Genetic factors play a key role in the susceptibility to diseases, resistance against medications and interference in the interaction with peripheral factors. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are the most common genetic changes (14). As the polymorphisms of the EGF gene affect the susceptibility to numerous types of cancer, the majority of the case-control studies on EGF genes have been conducted on exonic polymorphisms and untranslated regions (UTRs) (12,1517). In the present study, the hypothesis that the noncoding polymorphism, rs2298979, may be used to predict the susceptibility to CRC was tested in the Iranian population.

Materials and methods

Study population

Genetic analysis was conducted on a population of 220 patients suffering from sporadic CRC and 220 normal individuals who had been referred to the Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases (RIGLD), Taleghani Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (Tehran, Iran). Patients with a family history of hereditary non-polyposis CRC (HNPCC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) were excluded from this study. The patients and healthy individuals were all of Iranian nationality. A colonoscopy was performed on all participants in the patient and control groups, the medical normality of the control group was confirmed and the histological diagnosis of the pathologist was approved by the gastroenterologist. The parameters of age, gender and cigarette smoking status were controlled in the patient and control groups and the stage of CRC was determined in the patient group. The tumor stage was classified according to the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification of the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC; Table I). This study was conducted under the approval of the ethics committee of the Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (Tehran, Iran).

Table I

Demographic characteristics of the study population.

Table I

Demographic characteristics of the study population.

VariablePatients with CRCControls
Age, years ± mean43.12±15.36659.17±13.615
Gender, n (%)
 Male124 (56.4)97 (44.1)
 Female96 (43.6)123 (55.9)
Smoking, n (%)
 Yes15 (6.8)16 (7.3)
 No205 (93.2)204 (92.7)
Clinical stage, n (%)
 Stage I and II101 (45.9)-
 Stage III and IV119 (54.1)-

[i] Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), n=220; controls, n=220.

DNA extraction

Subsequent to obtaining a letter of consent from each individual, 5 ml peripheral blood was collected and stored at 4ºC in a bottle containing EDTA. Genomic DNA was extracted as soon as possible following sampling using the standard salting out method (18). The quality of the extracted DNA was then assessed using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA).

EGF rs2298979 gene polymorphism genotyping

Two specific primers were designed. The polymorphism was determined using the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method. The characteristics and sequence of the primers are shown in Table II. The 768-bp DNA fragment that was located in the intron region of the EGF gene was amplified using the specific primers (Table III). The PCR products were digested by PciI endonuclease enzyme (recognition sequence A/CATGT) for 6 h at 37ºC. In order to observe the digested fragments, the RFLP solution was separated on a 3% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide.

Table II

Primer sequence and resulting fragment length for the rs2298979 PCR.

Table II

Primer sequence and resulting fragment length for the rs2298979 PCR.

Primer no.DirectionPrimer sequence% GCResult (bp)
1Forward 5′-CATACAATAAACACTCGATAAGCC-3′37.5
2Reverse 5′-ACCTCCAACCAACCATACTACC-3′50768

[i] PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

Table III

Technical data for the rs2298979 polymorphism detection method.

Table III

Technical data for the rs2298979 polymorphism detection method.

FactorValue
PCR reaction condition, no. of cycles
 94ºC for 5 min1
 94ºC for 45 sec30
 65ºC for 40 sec-
 72ºC for 45 sec-
 72ºC for 5 min1
Master mix, μl
 10× PCR buffer2.50
 MgCl2 (50 mM)0.75
 Primer-forward (10 mM)1.00
 Primer-reverse (10 mM)1.00
 dNTP (10 mM)0.50
 Taq polymerase (5 U/μl)0.50
 Water17.75
Restriction enzymePciI
 Restriction enzyme time, h6
 Restriction pattern length, bp
  A768
  G508+260
 Agarose gel concentration, %3

[i] PCR, polymerase chain reaction; dNTP, deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate.

Sequencing

To confirm the RFLP procedure, 10% of the PCR products were sequenced using the ABI PRISM 3130xL Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems®, Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and the chain termination method (Fig. 1).

Statistical analysis

A Pearson χ2 test and Student's t-test were used to calculate the P-value, with P<0.05 considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. The data were analyzed using SPSS statistical software version 13 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Following enzymatic digestion, it was revealed that the size of the PCR products for the A/A genotype fragment was 768 bp in length, while the three fragments for the A/G genotype were 768, 508 and 260 bp, respectively. The genotype frequency percentages of the rs2298970 polymorphism for the patients with CRC were 28.6% for the A/A homozygote genotype and 71.4% for the A/G genotype. Moreover, the genotype frequency percentages of the controls were 16.4% for the A/A genotype and 83.6% for the A/G genotype. In the entire patient and control group population, the G/G genotype was not observed. Further details and frequency percentages of the A and G alleles for the patient and control groups are shown in Table IV. According to the results of the present study, there was a significant correlation between the A/G genotype of the rs2298979 polymorphism and a decreased risk of CRC compared with the control group [odds ratio (OR), 0.488; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.307–0.774; P=0.002]. However, no significant correlation was observed among the genotypes of the patients in terms of the stage parameters (Table V).

Table IV

Colorectal cancer risks correlated with rs2298979 SNP that were examined in the present study.

Table IV

Colorectal cancer risks correlated with rs2298979 SNP that were examined in the present study.

OR (95% CI)

GeneticsPatients, n (%)Controls, n (%)P-valueUnadjustedAdjustedP-value
Genotype
 A/A63 (28.6)36 (16.4)-1.00 (Reference)1.00 (Reference)-
 A/G157 (71.4)184 (83.6)0.0020.488 (0.307–0.774)0.449 (0.263–0.767)0.003
Alleles
 A283 (64.3)256 (58.2)-1.00 (Reference)--
 G157 (35.7)184 (41.8)0.0620.772 (0.588–1.013)--

[i] Patients, n=220; controls, n=220. SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

Table V

Tumor-stage specific distribution of EGF rs2298979 genotypes among patients with CRC.

Table V

Tumor-stage specific distribution of EGF rs2298979 genotypes among patients with CRC.

GenotypeStage I, n (%)Stage II, n (%)Stage III, n (%)Stage IV, n (%)P-value
A/A29 (64.4)38 (67.9)49 (75.4)41 (75.9)0.483
A/G16 (35.6)18 (32.1)16 (24.6)13 (24.1)-

[i] EGF, epidermal growth factor; CRC, colorectal cancer.

Discussion

EGF has a significant role in cell proliferation, differentiation and tumorigenesis of epithelial tissues (19). The action of a cell continuing along its intended survival or death pathway is affected by changes in the environmental signals. One of the most important signals from the periphery of the cell inducing cell survival is that of EGF, which attaches to the cell receptor (ErbB receptor family) and stimulates intercellular pathways. EGF signaling pathways are regulated by the concentration of EGF present (11). It has been demonstrated that the level of EGF in the plasma is significantly correlated with CRC (20). Polymorphisms of the EGF gene have also been shown to be correlated with several other types of cancer. Early studies were conducted to investigate the +61A/G polymorphism in the 5′UTR of the EGF gene. The results revealed that the polymorphism was correlated with cancer in individuals carrying the G allele of the +61A/G polymorphism of the EGF gene (12,15,16). To the best of our knowledge the correlation between the rs2298979 polymorphism of the EGF gene and sporadic CRC has been studied for the first time in the present study. The rs2298979 polymorphism is located in intron 1 of the EGF gene. In the present study, it was observed that the carriers of the A/G genotype in the patient group were less susceptible to CRC in comparison with the carriers of the hereditary A/A genotype. The mechanism of this correlation is unknown. The region where the SNP is located may be part of the regulatory sequence (21). The majority of studies on human genome sequences focus on protein coding regions (exons) (22). The protein coding regions in combination with the UTRs account for only 2% of the human genome. It has been revealed that the non-coding regions of the genome are effective in development, natural physiology and pathogenic processes (22). In addition, it has been demonstrated that there are SNPs present in intron regions that have a significant correlation with cancer and different types of diseases. In a study by Millar et al(23), it was revealed that the +1169A/T polymorphism located within intron 4 of the growth hormone I (GHI) gene was significantly correlated with the decrease in the circulation of growth hormone and the risk of cancer of the large intestine (23). Furthermore, Li et al(24) investigated the affect of two polymorphisms, +45G15G (T/G) and +276 (G/T), located in exon 1 and intron 4 of the adiponectin gene, respectively, in patients suffering from polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). No significant correlation was revealed between the disease and the +45G15G (T/G) polymorphism. By contrast, there was a statistically significant correlation between the +276 (G/T) polymorphism, located in intron 4, and PCOS disease (P=0.0126) (24). In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that the carriers of the A/G genotype among patients with CRC are less susceptible to the risk of cancer in comparison with the carriers of A/A genotype. Further studies on the intron regions of the EGF gene, particularly the rs2298979 polymorphism, are required in other populations.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all patients who participated in the study, which was conducted with the support of the Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science (Tehran, Iran).

References

1 

Janakiram NB and Rao CV: Molecular markers and targets for colorectal cancer prevention. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 29:1–20. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Haggar FA and Boushey RP: Colorectal cancer epidemiology: incidence, mortality, survival, and risk factors. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 22:191–197. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Chan AO, Soliman AS, Zhang Q, et al: Differing DNA methylation patterns and gene mutation frequencies in colorectal carcinomas from Middle Eastern countries. Clin Cancer Res. 11:8281–8287. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Yee YK, Tan VP, Chan P, Hung IF, Pang R and Wong BC: Epidemiology of colorectal cancer in Asia. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 24:1810–1816. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E and Forman D: Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 61:69–90. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Cheung DY, Kim TH, Kim CW, et al: The anatomical distribution of colorectal cancer in Korea: evaluation of the incidence of proximal and distal lesions and synchronous adenomas. Intern Med. 47:1649–1654. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Islamic Republic of Iran Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Office of Deputy Minister for Health Center for Disease Control, Cancer Office. Iranian Annual National Cancer Registration Report. 2005–2006. Mar;2007.

8 

Fahy B and Bold RJ: Epidemiology and molecular genetics of colorectal cancer. Surg Oncol. 7:115–123. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Lin L, Li G, Zhang Z, et al: Association of epidermal growth factor +61 A/G polymorphism in Chinese patients with colon cancer. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 16:1142–1145. 2012.

10 

Wilson KJ, Gilmore JL, Foley J, Lemmon MA and Riese DJ II: Functional selectivity of EGF family peptide growth factors: implications for cancer. Pharmacol Ther. 122:1–8. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Henson ES and Gibson SB: Surviving cell death through epidermal growth factor (EGF) signal transduction pathways: implications for cancer therapy. Cell Signal. 18:2089–2097. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Li TF, Ren KW and Liu PF: Meta-analysis of epidermal growth factor polymorphisms and cancer risk: involving 9,779 cases and 15,932 controls. DNA Cell Biol. 31:568–574. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

13 

Normanno N, De Luca A, Bianco C, et al: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling in cancer. Gene. 366:2–16. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Li LC, Chui RM, Sasaki M, et al: A single nucleotide polymorphism in the E-cadherin gene promoter alters transcriptional activities. Cancer Res. 60:873–876. 2000.PubMed/NCBI

15 

Zhang Y-M, Cao C and Liang K: Genetic polymorphism of epidermal growth factor 61A>G and cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol. 34:150–156. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Xu W, Li Y, Wang X, et al: Association between EGF promoter polymorphisms and cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Med Oncol. 27:1389–1397. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Tan D, Xu J, Li Y and Lai R: Association between +61G polymorphism of the EGF gene and glioma risk in different ethnicities: a meta-analysis. Tohoku J Exp Med. 222:229–235. 2010.

18 

Miller SA, Dykes DD and Polesky HF: A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 16:12151988. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Kang HG, Choi JE, Lee WK, et al: +61A>G polymorphism in the EGF gene does not increase the risk of lung cancer. Respirology. 12:902–905. 2007.

20 

Spindler KL, Nielsen JN, Ornskov D, Brandslund I and Jakobsen A: Epidermal growth factor (EGF) A61G polymorphism and EGF gene expression in normal colon tissue from patients with colorectal cancer. Acta Oncol. 46:1113–1117. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Werner T: Functional in silico analysis of non-coding SNPs. Bioinformatics for Geneticists. Barnes MR and Gray IC: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd; Chichester: pp. 273–287. 2003

22 

Esteller M: Non-coding RNAs in human disease. Nat Rev Genet. 12:861–874. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Millar DS, Horan M, Chuzhanova NA and Cooper DN: Characterisation of a functional intronic polymorphism in the human growth hormone (GH1) gene. Hum Genomics. 4:289–301. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Li L, Yun JH, Lee JH, Song S, Choi BC and Baek KH: Association study of +45G15G(T/G) and +276(G/T) polymorphisms in the adiponectin gene in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Int J Mol Med. 27:283–287. 2011.

Related Articles

Journal Cover

October 2013
Volume 6 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Chaleshi V, Haghighi MM, Savabkar S, Zali N, Vahedi M, Khanyaghma M, Javadi GR, Asadzade H and Zali MR: Correlation between the EGF gene intronic polymorphism, rs2298979, and colorectal cancer. Oncol Lett 6: 1079-1083, 2013
APA
Chaleshi, V., Haghighi, M.M., Savabkar, S., Zali, N., Vahedi, M., Khanyaghma, M. ... Zali, M.R. (2013). Correlation between the EGF gene intronic polymorphism, rs2298979, and colorectal cancer. Oncology Letters, 6, 1079-1083. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2013.1481
MLA
Chaleshi, V., Haghighi, M. M., Savabkar, S., Zali, N., Vahedi, M., Khanyaghma, M., Javadi, G. R., Asadzade, H., Zali, M. R."Correlation between the EGF gene intronic polymorphism, rs2298979, and colorectal cancer". Oncology Letters 6.4 (2013): 1079-1083.
Chicago
Chaleshi, V., Haghighi, M. M., Savabkar, S., Zali, N., Vahedi, M., Khanyaghma, M., Javadi, G. R., Asadzade, H., Zali, M. R."Correlation between the EGF gene intronic polymorphism, rs2298979, and colorectal cancer". Oncology Letters 6, no. 4 (2013): 1079-1083. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2013.1481