Limb salvage surgery following resection of a melanoma: Foot and ankle reconstruction using cutaneous flaps

Liu,Jian‑Feng; Zhao,Li‑Rong; Lu,Lai‑Jin; Chen,Lei; Liu,Zhi‑Gang; Gong,Xu; Liu,Bin

doi:10.3892/ol.2014.2440

Limb salvage surgery following resection of a melanoma: Foot and ankle reconstruction using cutaneous flaps

Authors:
- Jian‑Feng Liu
- Li‑Rong Zhao
- Lai‑Jin Lu
- Lei Chen
- Zhi‑Gang Liu
- Xu Gong
- Bin Liu
View Affiliations

Affiliations: Department of Hand Surgery, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130021, P.R. China, The Electric Medical Branch, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130021, P.R. China
Published online on: August 12, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2014.2440
Pages: 1966-1972

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

Abstract

Melanomas affect the foot and ankle region and are associated with a poor prognosis. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the functional and oncological outcomes of salvage surgery using cutaneous flaps for soft tissue reconstruction of the foot and ankle following the extended resection of a melanoma. A retrospective review was conducted to evaluate patients who presented with foot melanoma and underwent salvage surgery and defect reconstruction using three types of cutaneous flap (group S) or amputation (group A) between January 1999 and December 2010 at the First Hospital of Jilin University (Changchun, China). The postoperative mortality, surgical complications, functional outcomes and oncological outcomes were evaluated. Of the 21 patients, 11 were enrolled into group S and 10 were enrolled into group A. The median follow‑up time of the patients was 58 months (range, 6‑92 months). In group S, a reverse sural neurocutaneous island flap was used in six patients to perform the foot reconstruction, medial plantar flaps were used in four patients and lateral malleolus flaps were used in one patient. All 11 cutaneous flaps survived and provided satisfactory coverage. Only one cutaneous flap showed partial necrosis and required treatment comprising of debridement and regular changes to the wound dressing. The overall survival rate of patients was 65.0% and patients in the two groups experienced similar oncological outcomes. Salvage surgery with cutaneous flap reconstruction was found to be a reliable option for patients presenting with malignant melanoma of the foot and ankle.

View Figures

View References

1	Miller AJ and Mihm MC Jr: Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 355:51–65. 2006.
2	Bristow IR, de Berker DA, Acland KM, Turner RJ and Bowling J: Clinical guidelines for the recognition of melanoma of the foot and nail unit. J Foot Ankle Res. 3:252010.
3	Papagelopoulos PJ, Mavrogenis AF, Badekas A and Sim FH: Foot malignancies: a multidisciplinary approach. Foot Ankle Clin. 8:751–763. 2003.
4	Testori A, Rutkowski P, Marsden J, et al: Surgery and radiotherapy in the treatment of cutaneous melanoma. Ann Oncol. 20(Suppl 6): vi22–vi29. 2009.
5	Yeh JT, Lin CH and Lin YT: Skin grafting as a salvage procedure in diabetic foot reconstruction to avoid major limb amputation. Chang Gung Med J. 33:389–396. 2010.
6	Langstein HN, Chang DW, Miller MJ, et al: Limb salvage for soft-tissue malignancies of the foot: an evaluation of free-tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 109:152–159. 2002.
7	Ayyappan T and Chadha A: Super sural neurofasciocutaneous flaps in acute traumatic heel reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 109:2307–2313. 2002.
8	Yiacoumettis A and Mallouris A: Reconstructive options for defects after melanoma excision in the foot and ankle region. J Foot Ankle Surg. 50:498–503. 2011.
9	Lee YH, Rah SK, Choi SJ, Chung MS and Baek GH: Distally based lateral supramalleolar adipofascial flap for reconstruction of the dorsum of the foot and ankle. Plast Reconstr Surg. 114:1478–1485. 2004.
10	Masquelet AC, Beveridge J, Romana C and Gerber C: The lateral supramalleolar flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 81:74–81. 1988.
11	Kang HG, Kim JH, Cho HS, Han I, Oh JH and Kim HS: Soft tissue reconstruction of the foot using the distally based island pedicle flap after resection of malignant melanoma. Clin Orthop Surg. 2:244–249. 2010.
12	Duman H, Er E, Işík S, et al: Versatility of the medial plantar flap: our clinical experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 109:1007–1012. 2002.
13	Oh SJ, Moon M, Cha J, Koh SH and Chung CH: Weight-bearing plantar reconstruction using versatile medial plantar sensate flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 64:248–254. 2011.
14	Masquelet AC, Romana MC and Wolf G: Skin island flaps supplied by the vascular axis of the sensitive superficial nerves: anatomic study and clinical experience in the leg. Plast Reconstr Surg. 89:1115–1121. 1992.
15	Rashid OM, Schaum JC, Wolfe LG, Brinster NK and Neifeld JP: Prognostic variables and surgical management of foot melanoma: review of a 25-year institutional experience. ISRN Dermatol. 2011:3847292011.
16	Garbe C, Peris K, Hauschild A, Saiag P, Middleton M, Spatz A, et al: European Dermatology Forum; European Association of Dermato-Oncology; European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer: Diagnosis and treatment of melanoma. European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline - Update 2012. Eur J Cancer. 48:2375–2390. 2012.
17	Esezobor EE, Nwokike OC, Aranmolate S, Onuminya JE and Abikoye FO: Sural nerve preservation in reverse sural artery fasciocutaneous flap - a case report. Ann Surg Innov Res. 6:102012.
18	Gir P, Cheng A, Oni G, Mojallal A and Saint-Cyr M: Pedicled-perforator (propeller) flaps in lower extremity defects: a systematic review. J Reconstr Microsurg. 28:595–601. 2012.
19	Hallock GG: A paradigm shift in flap selection protocols for zones of the lower extremity using perforator flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg. 29:233–240. 2013.
20	Harrison DH and Morgan BD: The instep island flap to resurface plantar defects. Br J Plast Surg. 34:315–318. 1981.
21	Acikel C, Celikoz B, Yuksel F and Ergun O: Various applications of the medial plantar flap to cover the defects of the plantar foot, posterior heel, and ankle. Ann Plast Surg. 50:498–503. 2003.
22	Koshima I, Narushima M, Mihara M, et al: Island medial plantar artery perforator flap for reconstruction of plantar defects. Ann Plast Surg. 59:558–562. 2007.
23	Almeida MF, da Costa PR and Okawa RY: Reverse-flow island sural flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 109:583–591. 2002.
24	Rohmiller MT and Callahan BS: The reverse sural neurocutaneous flap for hindfoot and ankle coverage: experience and review of the literature. Orthopedics. 28:1449–1453. 2005.
25	Dai J, Chai Y, Wang C, Wen G, Liu S and Zhang W: Comparative study of two types of distally based sural neurocutaneous flap for reconstruction of lower leg, ankle, and heel. J Reconstr Microsurg. 29:125–130. 2013.
26	Hamdi MF and Khlifi A: Lateral supramalleolar flap for coverage of ankle and foot defects in children. J Foot Ankle Surg. 51:106–109. 2012.
27	Voche P, Merle M and Stussi JD: The lateral supramalleolar flap: experience with 41 flaps. Ann Plast Surg. 54:49–54. 2005.
28	Afifi AM, Mahboub TA, Losee JE, Smith DM and Khalil HH: The reverse sural flap: modifications to improve efficacy in foot and ankle reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 61:430–436. 2008.
29	Walsh SM, Fisher SG and Sage RA: Survival of patients with primary pedal melanoma. J Foot Ankle Surg. 42:193–198. 2003.
30	Garbe C, Peris K, Hauschild A, et al: Diagnosis and treatment of melanoma: European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline. Eur J Cancer. 46:270–283. 2010.