FOXQ1 is overexpressed in laryngeal carcinoma and affects cell growth, cell cycle progression and cell invasion

Introduction

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the eighth leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide (1). Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC), the second most common malignant neoplasm of the upper respiratory tract, is a subtype of HNSCC (2). Approximately 10,000 new cases of LSCC are diagnosed each year in the United States (3). In China, the incidence of LSCC is increasing, particularly in the country's Northeast region (4). Significant predisposing factors to the development and progression of LSCC, include alcohol abuse and tobacco (5). Early stage LSCC may be effectively treated with surgery or radiotherapy (6). When diagnosed at an advanced stage, this disease usually requires a combination of treatment modalities. However, although such combined therapy has improved local control and overall quality of life, the local recurrence rate varies from 10–50%, depending on tumor stage and the overall survival rate has not improved significantly over two decades (7,8). Therefore, it is necessary to identify novel biomarkers for use in the diagnosis of LSCC. In addition, the study of the molecular mechanisms underlying the development of LSCC may improve treatment and increase survival for patients with this disease.

Forkhead box Q1 (FOXQ1, also termed HFH1) is a member of the forkhead transcription factor family (9), which is involved in a variety of biological processes, including epithelial differentiation (10), cell cycle progression (11), embryonic stem cell differentiation (12), metabolism (13,14) and carcinogenesis (15–17). As one of the first forkhead genes to be investigated, FOXQ1 has been demonstrated to be involved in metabolism, aging (18) and carcinogenesis (19). Overexpression of the FOXQ1 protein is associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and a poor prognosis in certain types of cancer, such as non-small cell lung cancer (20) and breast cancer (21). However, little is known regarding FOXQ1 expression in LSCC and its involvement in the pathogenesis of this disease. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of FOXQ1 expression on the development and progression of LSCC, by measuring its expression in LSCC tissue samples, and investigating its effect on cell proliferation, cell cycle progression and cell migration.

Materials and methods

Patients and tissue samples

Thirty pairs of LSCC and corresponding adjacent normal tissues, used for reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and western blotting, were collected from the Ear, Nose and Throat department of The 463 Hospital of PLA (Shenyang, China) between January 2009 and December 2014, following receipt of written informed consent. Tissue samples were obtained from 24 males and 6 females (mean age, 64.72 years; range, 45–83 years) and included 6 cases of stage I LSCC, 6 cases of stage II LSCC, 8 cases of stage III LSCC and 10 cases of stage IV LSCC. Tumors were staged according to the International Union Against Cancer TNM classification for malignant tumors (22). All tissue samples, including cancer tissues and matched adjacent normal tissues (typically removed from areas 4–15 mm from the tumors), were obtained during surgery. All specimens were frozen and stored at −80°C prior to use. Approval for this study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of China Medical University (Shenyang, China).

Cell culture

The Hep2 human laryngeal carcinoma cell line, was obtained from the Shanghai Institute for Biochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). Cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 (Gibco Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 µg/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (all obtained from GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Logan, UT, USA) in humidified 5% CO2 at 37°C. Trypsin solution (0.25%; GE Healthcare Life Sciences) was used to detach cells from the culture flask.

Transient transfection with FOXQ1-specific small interfering RNA (siRNA)

Three siRNAs targeting human FOXQ1 and a negative control siRNA (FOXQ1-NC), were designed and obtained from GenePharma Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The siRNAs and FOXQ1-NC siRNA (FOXQ1-siRNA1, 5′-CGCGGACTTTGCACTTTGA-3′; FOXQ1-siRNA2, 5′-AGGGAACCTTTCCACACTA-3′; FOXQ1-siRNA3, 5′-CCATCAAACGTGCCTTAAA-3′; and FOXQ1-NC siRNA, 5′-TTCTCCGAACGTGTCACGT-3′) were used to inhibit the expression of FOXQ1. Preliminary experiments indicated that FOXQ1-siRNA1 most effectively down-regulated FOXQ1 expression. This sequence was therefore selected for subsequent experiments. Hep2 cell were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 0.5×106 cells/well. FOXQ1-siRNA, FOXQ1-NC and mock group (blank control ± transfection reagent) were transfected into Hep2 cells using lipofectamine 2000 transfection reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Following transfection for 72 h, cells were collected for subsequent experiments.

RNA isolation and RT-qPCR

Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol™ reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies) for analysis of FOXQ1 and GAPDH mRNA expression, according to the manufacturer's instructions. RNA was reverse transcribed, using the Reverse Transcription PCR kit with Oligo-dT primers and RT-qPCR was conducted, using SYBR-Premix Ex Taq™ (Takara Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan), according to the manufacturer's instructions. For detection of FOXQ1-mRNA expression, qPCR was performed under the following conditions: Denaturation at 95°C for 30 sec, followed by 40 cycles of amplification (annealing at 95°C for 5 sec and elongation at 60°C for 30 sec). GAPDH was used to normalize FOXQ1-mRNA expression levels using the 2−ΔΔCt method. The following primers were used: Forward, 5′-ATTTCTTGCTATTGACCGATGC-3′ and reverse, 5′-CCCAAGGAGACCACAGTTAGAG-3′ for FOXQ1 and forward, 5′-GGAAGATGGTGATGGGATT-3′ and reverse, 5′-GGATTTGGTCGTATTGGG-3′ for GAPDH. All primers were purchased from Takara Bio, Inc.

Western blotting

Western blot analysis was performed according to standard procedures. In brief, protein was isolated from tissue samples or cells. Protein concentration was determined using a bicinchoninic acid Protein Assay kit (Pierce Biotechnology, Inc., Rockford, IL, USA). Proteins were fractionated using SDS-PAGE (Invitrogen Life Technologies) and transferred to PVDF membranes (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Haimen, China). After blocking with 5% milk in Tris-buffered saline with Tween-20 (TBST; Invitrogen Life Technologies), membranes were incubated with a polyclonal rabbit anti-human FOXQ1 antibody (cat. no. sc-134549; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA) at a 1:1,000 dilution over 3 h. The membranes were then washed thrice with TBST, and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated polyclonal goat anti-rabbit (cat. no. KC-MM-095) or goat anti-mouse (cat. no. KC-MM-035) secondary antibodies (KangCheng, Shanghai, China) at a 1:2,000 dilution for 2 h at room temperature. The membranes were also stripped and blotted with a monoclonal mouse anti-human β-actin antibody (cat. no. A5316; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at a 1:1,000 dilution, as a loading control. Blots were developed with enhanced chemiluminescence and chemiluminescence detection film (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology).

Cell proliferation assay

Hep2 cells were transfected with mock, FOXQ1-NC and FOXQ1-siRNA, and cells were seeded in 96-well plates at 4,000 cells per well. The proliferating cells were measured using a Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology), at 2, 4, 6 and 8 days following transfection. Cells were incubated at 37°C for 2 h following the addition of 10 µl CCK-8 to each well and the absorbance at 450 nm was detected using a microplate reader (MK3; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).

Cell cycle and apoptosis assay

For analysis of cell cycle progression and apoptosis, mock and transfected cells were fixed in 70% cold ethanol for 30 min. After washing with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) 3 times, the samples were centrifuged at 500 × g for 5 min. The pellets were then suspended and stained with 10 mg/l propidium iodide and 100 mg/l RNase for 20 min. The distribution of cells in each phase of the cell cycle and the proportion of apoptotic cells were analyzed using FACScan cytometry (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA).

Matrigel invasion assay

Following transfection for 24 h, 2×105 Hep2 cells were suspended in culture medium with 1% FBS and plated in the upper chamber of the Transwell plate with matrigel-coated membrane (Becton Dickinson). Cells were incubated for 36 h, following which, cells that had not invaded through the filter were removed. Cells on the lower surface of the membrane were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, then washed with PBS and stained using hematoxylin and eosin, according to the manufacturer's instructions. The number of cells on the membrane were counted under a microscope (CX31; Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The number of migrated cells was expressed as the mean value of five randomly-selected fields. Each experiment was repeated three times.

Statistical analysis

All values in the present study are reported as the mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments. The paired samples t-test was used to compare the expression of FOXQ1 mRNA and protein between LSCC and adjacent tissues, while one-way analysis of variance and Student's t-test were used to compare values between the experimental and control groups, using SPSS 13.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

FOXQ1 expression in LSCC tissues and adjacent normal tissues

Total RNA was extracted from 30 pairs of LSCC tissues and adjacent normal tissues and subjected to RT-qPCR in order to measure the expression of FOXQ1 mRNA. Following normalization to GAPDH, the mean expression of FOXQ1 mRNA in LSCC tissues was significantly higher than that in adjacent normal tissues (1.54±0.66 vs. 0.75±0.28; P<0.05; Fig. 1A). FOXQ1 protein expression was also measured by western blotting in the same samples in which FOXQ1 mRNA expression was measured. The results demonstrated that FOXQ1 protein expression was increased in 19 of 30 LSCC tissues (~63%), compared with matched adjacent normal tissues. FOXQ1 protein expression was higher in LSCC tissues than that in adjacent normal tissues (Fig. 1B; P<0.05). These findings were in accordance with the FOXQ1 mRNA expression data. By contrast, analysis of the association of FOXQ1 expression with characteristics, such as patient age, gender and tumor stage, revealed no significant associations between these variable (data not shown).

Figure 1. Expression of FOXQ1 in LSCC tissues and adjacent normal tissues. (A) FOXQ1 mRNA expression, as measured by RT-qPCR. FOXQ1 mRNA expression was detected in 30 matched LSCC tissue and adjacent normal tissue samples. Following normalization to GAPDH mRNA levels, FOXQ1 mRNA expression in LSCC tissues was shown to be higher than that in adjacent normal tissues. (B) Expression of the FOXQ1 protein in LSCC tissues and adjacent normal tissues. FOXQ1 expression in LSCC tissues (T) and adjacent normal tissues (N) samples was detected by western blotting and β-actin was used as a control. *P<0.05 vs. normal tissues. FOXQ1, forkhead box Q1; LSCC, laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma; RT-qPCR, reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

Inhibition of FOXQ1 following siRNA transfection in Hep2 cells

Following transfection of Hep2 cell with FOXQ1 siRNA for 72 h, the expression of FOXQ1 mRNA and protein was detected by RT-qPCR and western blotting. Cells were also transfected with FOXQ1-NC as a negative control. The results are shown in (Fig. 2). Following transfection with FOXQ1 siRNA, Hep2 cells exhibited significant downregulation of FOXQ1 expression at the mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 2A and B; P<0.05).

Figure 2. Knockdown of FOXQ1 mRNA and protein expression in Hep2 cells. Hep2 cells transfected with FOXQ1-siRNA or FOXQ1-NC siRNA were grown under normal culture conditions. RNA and protein were detected using RT-qPCR (A) and western blotting (B), respectively. GAPDH and β-actin were used as internal controls. *P<0.05 compared with the control group. FOXQ1, forkhead box Q1; RT-qPCR, reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction; siRNA, small interfering RNA; Mock, blank control ± Lipofectamine 2000; NC, normal control.

Downregulation of FOXQ1 expression reduces proliferation of Hep2 cells

Cell proliferation was determined using a CCK-8 assay. The results demonstrated that downregulation of FOXQ1 in Hep2 cells resulted in a significant reduction in cellular proliferation at 4, 6 and 8 d after transfection (P<0.05). This indicates that suppression of FOXQ1 correlates with decreased proliferation of Hep2 cells (Fig. 3).

Figure 3. Downregulation of FOXQ1 expression decreased proliferation of Hep2 cells. Growth curves of Hep2 cells transfected with Hep2-NC, FOXQ1 siRNA and mock group. FOXQ1 downregulation significantly inhibited Hep2 cell growth. Each experiment was conducted in triplicate. *P<0.05 compares with the control group. FOXQ1, forkhead box Q1; Mock, blank control ± Lipofectamine 2000; NC, normal control; siRNA, small interfering RNA; OD, optical density.

Inhibition of FOXQ1 induces G0/G1 arrest, while it has no effect on apoptosis in Hep2 cells

Flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle demonstrated that inhibition of FOXQ1 in Hep2 cells reduced the proportion of cells in the S and G2/M phases, and more cells were arrested in the G0/G1 phase compared with cells in the control group (Table I). Furthermore, apoptosis of FOXQ1-NC- and FOXQ1-siRNA-transfected cells was examined using flow cytometry. As shown in Table I, after 4 days, 2.42% and 2.84% of control cells and FOXQ1-NC cells were apoptotic, respectively, while 2.95% of FOXQ1-siRNA cells were apoptotic. No significant difference in the level of apoptosis in Hep2 cells was detected among these groups.

Table I. Flow cytometry analysis of cell cycle progression and apoptosis.

Table I.

Flow cytometry analysis of cell cycle progression and apoptosis.

Group	G0/G1 phase (%)	S phase (%)	G2/M phase (%)	Apoptosis (%)
Mock	47.64±3.61	27.55±1.54	22.39±3.44	2.42±0.78
FOXQ1-NC	46.65±0.89	28.64±1.85	21.87±1.23	2.84±2.64
FOXQ1-siRNA	58.03±3.45a	23.35±0.65	15.67±2.15	2.95±1.65

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn1-ol-0-0-3530'] } Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments.

a P<0.05, compared with the control group. FOXQ1, forkhead box Q1; NC, normal control; siRNA, small interfering RNA.

Effect of FOXQ1 silencing on cell invasion in Hep2 cell lines

The results of the matrigel invasion assay demonstrated that the number of migrating cells was significantly decreased in the FOXQ1-siRNA transfection group, compared with that in the control group. The numbers of invading cells in the mock and FOXQ1-NC groups were 21.46±3.35 and 19.29±3.16, respectively, which were significantly higher than the number in the FOXQ1-siRNA group (10.24±2.52; P<0.01; Fig. 4).

Figure 4. Invasiveness of Hep2 cells. (A) Invasiveness of Hep2 cells before treatment. (B) Invasive chart of Hep2 cells transfected with FOXQ1-NC siRNA. (C) Invasive chart of Hep2 cell transfected with FOXQ1-siRNA. (D) Number of transmembrane cells in the mock, FOXQ1-NC and FOXQ1-siRNA groups. *P<0.05 compared with the control group. FOXQ1, forkhead box Q1; Mock, blank control ± Lipofectamine 2000; NC, normal control; siRNA, small interfering RNA.

Discussion

FOXQ1 belongs to the forkhead transcription factor family. Previous studies have demonstrated that FOXQ1 is a downstream target of homeobox C13. Each of these may affect medullary differentiation through a common regulatory pathway (23,24). A recent study reported that FOXQ1 promotes glioma cell proliferation and migration by suppressing the promoter activity of neurexin-3-α (NRXN3) (25). Overexpression of FOXQ1 may enhance tumor growth and tumorigenicity of colorectal cancer (19). Furthermore, overexpression of FOXQ1 is associated with a poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer (20) and with EMT regulation, via inhibition of E-cadherin transcription (26). To date, little is known regarding the mechanism underlying the effect of FOXQ1 on the development of human laryngeal cancer.

In the present study, FOXQ1 expression was upregulated at the mRNA and protein level in LSCC tissues, compared with adjacent normal tissues. However, no significant association was detected between FOXQ1 expression level, and gender, age or tumor stage in patients with LSCC. In order to examine whether FOXQ1 is involved in the development and progression of LSCC, RNA interference was used to reduce the expression of FOXQ1 in cultured Hep2 cells. Significant inhibition expression of FOXQ1 was observed with RT-qPCR and western blotting. In vitro suppression of Hep2 cell proliferation was analyzed, and the results demonstrated that, compared with FOXQ1-NC and mock cell groups, the proliferation of Hep2 cells was significantly inhibited following transfection with FOXQ1-siRNA.

In order to measure the effect of FOXQ1 on cell cycle progression, FACS analyses was performed, following transfection of FOXQ1-siRNA. The results indicated that siRNA-mediated knockdown of FOXQ1, led to cell cycle arrest in the G0/G1 phase. Gao et al (27) obtained similar results and suggested that expression of FOXQ1 may affect levels of cell cycle regulators; depletion of FOXQ1 reduced the expression of cyclin E and CDK4 and increased that of the cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors (CKDIs), p27Kip1 and p21Cip1, which together prevented cell cycle progression.

Kaneda et al (19) and Qin et al (28) demonstrated that apoptosis was inhibited in H1299 cells overexpressing FOXQ1 and in the 7721 hepatocellular carcinoma cell line, respectively. However, in the present study, no significant difference in the level of apoptosis was detected, following suppression of FOXQ1, among the Hep2 cell groups. These findings are in accordance with those of Gao et al (27), which were conducted in the SKOV3 ovarian cancer cell line. It is therefore hypothesized that the effect of FOXQ1 on apoptosis may vary among different types of carcinoma. The mechanism underlying the influence of FOXQ1 on apoptosis requires further investigation.

The primary cause of death in almost all forms of cancer, including breast (29) and colorectal cancer (30), is cancer cell metastasis to distant organs. The initial step in metastasis is the invasion of surrounding tissues by cancer cells, and tissue invasion and metastasis are hallmarks of malignant tumors. Suppression of the pathways involved in invasion and metastasis in cancer cells may be a treatment option for patients with cancer. The results of the transwell assay in the present study, suggested that deletion of FOXQ1 in Hep2 cells transfected with siRNA may significantly reduce cell invasiveness, which further indicates that FOXQ1 is associated with the aggressiveness of LSCC cells. Sun et al (25) showed that FOXQ1 expression directly affected glioma cell migration in an NRXN3-dependent manner in vitro and in vivo. Zhu et al (31) demonstrated that suppression of FOXQ1 expression reversed the process of EMT, in association with the upregulation of E-cadherin, and that it also caused T24 bladder cancer cells to acquire an epithelial cobblestone phenotype, resulting in significantly reduced invasiveness. These results suggest that FOXQ1 is involved in tumor invasion and metastasis.

The present study demonstrated that the mRNA and protein expression of FOXQ1 was increased in LSCC tissues, compared with normal adjacent tissues. The results also showed that inhibition of FOXQ1 by transfection of siRNA into Hep2 cells significantly reduced cell growth and migration, and arrested Hep2 cells in the G0/G1 phase, in contrast to the control groups. These results indicate that FOXQ1 exhibits an oncogenic role in LSCC, which is in accordance with the results of previous studies, conducted in different types of tumors.

In conclusion, the current study has demonstrated that FOXQ1 is overexpressed in LSCC tissues, and that it may affect Hep2 cell growth, cell cycle progression and cell migration. These results suggest that FOXQ1 is a potential therapeutic target in laryngeal cancer. However, the siRNA was only transiently transfected, no long-term effects on cells were examined, and in vitro effects may differ from in vivo effects. Therefore further in vivo evaluation is required.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant from the Medicine Summit Project of Liaoning Province (grant no. 4010218).

References