Clinical and computed tomography imaging features of renal medullary carcinoma: A report of six cases

  • Authors:
    • Zhenshan Shi
    • Qian Zhuang
    • Ruixiong You
    • Yueming Li
    • Jian Li
    • Dairong Cao
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: November 9, 2015     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.3891
  • Pages: 261-266
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Patients with renal medullary carcinoma (RMC) have a poor prognosis, usually due to late diagnosis. Computed tomography (CT) analysis may aid the differentiation between RMC and other types of renal cell carcinoma, in order to establish an accurate early diagnosis. There is a limited number of reports in the literature focusing on clinical and multi‑slice CT (MSCT) imaging findings of RMC. Consequently, the present study aimed to characterize the clinical and MSCT imaging features of RMC. For this purpose, the MSCT imaging findings of 6 patients with RMC were retrospectively studied. The patients were subjected to MSCT in order to investigate the characteristics of the tumors, including location, size, density, calcification, cystic or solid appearance, capsule sign, enhancement pattern and presence of retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis. The tumors in the current study presented a mean diameter of 7.48±3.25 cm, and were observed to be solitary and heterogeneous with necrotic components. The majority of the tumors did not contain calcifications (5/6); displayed an ill‑defined margin (4/6); were centered in the medulla; extended into the renal pelvis or peripelvic tissues (6/6); and did not exhibit a fibrous capsule. Localized caliectasis was observed in 3 of the 6 cases. The attenuation of the solid region of the RMC on unenhanced CT was equal to that of the renal cortex or medulla (42.3±2.7 vs. 40.7±3.6 and 41.2±3.9 Hounsfield units, respectively; P>0.05) while, on enhanced CT, the enhancement of the tumor was lower than that of the normal renal cortex and medulla during all phases (cortical phase, 52.6±4.8 vs. l99.5±9.7 and 72.7±6.4; medullary phase, 58.6±5.7 vs. 184.6±10.8 and 93.5±7.8; delayed phase, 56.8±6.1 vs. 175.7±8.5 and 96.5±7.9, respectively; P<0.05). In conclusion, RMC tends to be an infiltrative, ill‑defined heterogeneous mass with intratumoral necrosis, which arises from the renal medulla, and displays lower enhancement than the renal cortex and medulla during all phases on enhanced CT. Despite its rarity in adults, RMC should be included in a differential diagnosis when CT imaging reveals these features.
View Figures
View References

Related Articles

Journal Cover

January-2016
Volume 11 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Shi Z, Zhuang Q, You R, Li Y, Li J and Cao D: Clinical and computed tomography imaging features of renal medullary carcinoma: A report of six cases. Oncol Lett 11: 261-266, 2016.
APA
Shi, Z., Zhuang, Q., You, R., Li, Y., Li, J., & Cao, D. (2016). Clinical and computed tomography imaging features of renal medullary carcinoma: A report of six cases. Oncology Letters, 11, 261-266. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.3891
MLA
Shi, Z., Zhuang, Q., You, R., Li, Y., Li, J., Cao, D."Clinical and computed tomography imaging features of renal medullary carcinoma: A report of six cases". Oncology Letters 11.1 (2016): 261-266.
Chicago
Shi, Z., Zhuang, Q., You, R., Li, Y., Li, J., Cao, D."Clinical and computed tomography imaging features of renal medullary carcinoma: A report of six cases". Oncology Letters 11, no. 1 (2016): 261-266. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.3891