|
1
|
Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z and Jemal A: Cancer
statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 64:9–29. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
2
|
Goldberg AA, Titorenko VI, Beach A and
Sanderson JT: Bile acids induce apoptosis selectively in
androgen-dependent and -independent prostate cancer cells. PeerJ.
1:e1222013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3
|
Wang Y, Bai WK, Shen E and Hu B:
Sonoporation by low-frequency and low-power ultrasound enhances
chemotherapeutic efficacy in prostate cancer cells. Oncol Lett.
6:495–498. 2013.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4
|
Bahl A, Masson S, Birtle A, Chowdhury S
and de Bono J: Second-line treatment options in metastatic
castration-resistant prostate cancer: A comparison of key trials
with recently approved agents. Cancer Treat Rev. 40:170–177. 2014.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
Ganju A, Yallapu MM, Khan S, Behrman SW,
Chauhan SC and Jaggi M: Nanoways to overcome docetaxel resistance
in prostate cancer. Drug Resist Updat. 17:13–23. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
6
|
Pienta KJ and Smith DC: Advances in
prostate cancer chemotherapy: A new era begins. CA Cancer J Clin.
55:300–318; quiz 323–325. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
7
|
Sweeney CJ, Miller KD, Sissons SE, Nozaki
S, Heilman DK, Shen J and Sledge GW Jr: The antiangiogenic property
of docetaxel is synergistic with a recombinant humanized monoclonal
antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor or
2-methoxyestradiol but antagonized by endothelial growth factors.
Cancer Res. 61:3369–3372. 2001.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
8
|
Wang Y, Hu B, Diao X and Zhang J:
Antitumor effect of microbubbles enhanced by low frequency
ultrasound cavitation on prostate carcinoma xenografts in nude
mice. Exper Ther Med. 3:187–191. 2012.
|
|
9
|
Levenback BJ, Sehgal CM and Wood AK:
Modeling of thermal effects in antivascular ultrasound therapy. J
Acoust Soc Am. 131:540–549. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
10
|
Hwang JH, Brayman AA, Reidy MA, Matula TJ,
Kimmey MB and Crum LA: Vascular effects induced by combined 1-MHz
ultrasound and microbubble contrast agent treatments in vivo.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 31:553–564. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
11
|
Wood AK, Bunte RM, Price HE, Deitz MS,
Tsai JH, Lee WM and Sehgal CM: The disruption of murine tumor
neovasculature by low-intensity ultrasound-comparison between 1-
and 3-MHz sonication frequencies. Acad Radiol. 15:1133–1141. 2008.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
12
|
Liu Z, Gao S, Zhao Y, Li P, Liu J, Li P,
Tan K and Xie F: Disruption of tumor neovasculature by microbubble
enhanced ultrasound: A potential new physical therapy of
anti-angiogenesis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 38:253–261. 2012.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
13
|
Goertz DE, Todorova M, Mortazavi O, Agache
V, Chen B, Karshafian R and Hynynen K: Antitumor effects of
combining docetaxel (taxotere) with the antivascular action of
ultrasound stimulated microbubbles. PloS One. 7:e523072012.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
14
|
Yang Y, Bai W, Chen Y, Lin Y and Hu B:
Optimization of low-frequency low-intensity ultrasound-mediated
microvessel disruption on prostate cancer xenografts in nude mice
using an orthogonal experimental design. Oncol Lett. 10:2999–3007.
2015.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
15
|
Coralic V and Colonius T: Shock-induced
collapse of a bubble inside a deformable vessel. Eur J Mech B
Fluids. 40:64–74. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
16
|
Gao F, Hu Y and Hu H: Asymmetrical
oscillation of a bubble confined inside a micro pseudoelastic blood
vessel and the corresponding vessel wall stresses. Int J Solids
Struct. 44:7197–7212. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
17
|
Gao F, Xiong C and Xiong Y: Constrained
oscillation of a bubble subjected to shock wave in microvessel.
Prog Nat Sci. 19:1109–1117. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
18
|
Liu J, Xiao S, Wu S, Ou W, He J, Gao S and
Liu Z: Disruption of splenic circulation using microbubble-enhanced
ultrasound and prothrombin: A preliminary study. Ultrasound Med
Biol. 38:1930–1937. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
19
|
Moonen C and Lentacker I: Ultrasound
assisted drug delivery. Preface. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 72:1–2. 2014.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
20
|
Sorace AG, Warram JM, Umphrey H and Hoyt
K: Microbubble-mediated ultrasonic techniques for improved
chemotherapeutic delivery in cancer. J Drug Target. 20:43–54. 2012.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
21
|
Nabili M, Shenoy A, Chawla S, Mahesh S,
Liu J, Geist C and Zderic V: Ultrasound-enhanced ocular delivery of
dexamethasone sodium phosphate: An in vivo study. J Ther
Ultrasound. 2:62014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
22
|
Liu HL, Fan CH, Ting CY and Yeh CK:
Combining microbubbles and ultrasound for drug delivery to brain
tumors: Current progress and overview. Theranostics. 4:432–444.
2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
23
|
Kooiman K, Vos HJ, Versluis M and de Jong
N: Acoustic behavior of microbubbles and implications for drug
delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 72:28–48. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
24
|
Chen H, Brayman AA, Bailey MR and Matula
TJ: Blood vessel rupture by cavitation. Urol Res. 38:321–326. 2010.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
25
|
Chen H, Kreider W, Brayman AA, Bailey MR
and Matula TJ: Blood vessel deformations on microsecond time scales
by ultrasonic cavitation. Phys Rev Lett. 106:0343012011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
26
|
Chen H, Brayman AA, Kreider W, Bailey MR
and Matula TJ: Observations of translation and jetting of
ultrasound-activated microbubbles in mesenteric microvessels.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 37:2139–2148. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
27
|
Dayton PA, Zhao S, Bloch SH, Schumann P,
Penrose K, Matsunaga TO, Zutshi R, Doinikov A and Ferrara KW:
Application of ultrasound to selectively localize nanodroplets for
targeted imaging and therapy. Mol Imaging. 5:160–174.
2006.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
28
|
Tzu-Yin W, Wilson KE, Machtaler S and
Willmann JK: Ultrasound and microbubble guided drug delivery:
Mechanistic understanding and clinical implications. Curr Pharm
Biotechnol. 14:743–752. 2013.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
29
|
Karshafian R, Bevan PD, Williams R, Samac
S and Burns PN: Sonoporation by ultrasound-activated microbubble
contrast agents: Effect of acoustic exposure parameters on cell
membrane permeability and cell viability. Ultrasound Med Biol.
35:847–860. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
30
|
Jin LF, Li F, Wang HP, Wei F, Qin P and Du
LF: Ultrasound targeted microbubble destruction stimulates cellular
endocytosis in facilitation of adeno-associated virus delivery. Int
J Mol Sci. 14:9737–9750. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
31
|
Sheikov N, McDannold N, Sharma S and
Hynynen K: Effect of focused ultrasound applied with an ultrasound
contrast agent on the tight junctional integrity of the brain
microvascular endothelium. Ultrasound Med Biol. 34:1093–1104. 2008.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
32
|
Liu Y, Yi S, Zhang J, Fang Z, Zhou F, Jia
W, Liu Z and Ye G: Effect of microbubble-enhanced ultrasound on
prostate permeability: A potential therapeutic method for prostate
disease. Urology. 81:921.e1–921.e7. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
33
|
Eggen S, Fagerland SM, Mørch Ý, Hansen R,
Søvik K, Berg S, Furu H, Bøhn AD, Lilledahl MB, Angelsen A, et al:
Ultrasound-enhanced drug delivery in prostate cancer xenografts by
nanoparticles stabilizing microbubbles. J Control Release.
187:39–49. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
34
|
Shen ZY, Shen E, Diao XH, Bai WK, Zeng MX,
Luan YY, Nan SL, Lin YD, Wei C, Chen L, et al: Inhibitory effects
of subcutaneous tumors in nude mice mediated by low-frequency
ultrasound and microbubbles. Oncol Lett. 7:1385–1390.
2014.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
35
|
Tomizawa M, Shinozaki F, Motoyoshi Y,
Sugiyama T, Yamamoto S and Sueishi M: Sonoporation: Gene transfer
using ultrasound. World J Methodol. 3:39–44. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
36
|
Karshafian R, Samac S, Bevan PD and Burns
PN: Microbubble mediated sonoporation of cells in suspension:
Clonogenic viability and influence of molecular size on uptake.
Ultrasonics. 50:691–697. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
37
|
Yoon YI, Kwon YS, Cho HS, Heo SH, Park KS,
Park SG, Lee SH, Hwang SI, Kim YI, Jae HJ, et al:
Ultrasound-mediated gene and drug delivery using a
microbubble-liposome particle system. Theranostics. 4:1133–1144.
2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
38
|
Zhang B, Zhou H, Cheng Q, Lei L and Hu B:
Low-frequency low energy ultrasound combined with microbubbles
induces distinct apoptosis of A7r5 cells. Mol Med Rep.
10:3282–3288. 2014.PubMed/NCBI
|
