Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging of T-lymphoblastic lymphoma patients
- Authors:
- Published online on: June 29, 2016 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2016.4806
- Pages: 1620-1622
Abstract
Introduction
T-Lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL) is a rare and aggressive subtype of adult non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) (1). The unique clinical and biological characteristics of T-LBL, including a male predominance and a high incidence of mediastinal tumors, differ from those of diffuse large B-lymphoblastic lymphoma, which is the most common type of NHL (1). In addition, T-LBL has a poor long-term survival rate with standard cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone-like chemotherapy (2).
Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has been widely used for the evaluation of lymphoma, including NHL (3). With FDG-PET, it is possible to assess the lymphoma burden in the entire body, as FDG-PET is a more sensitive and specific diagnostic tool compared with other imaging modalities, such as computed tomography (3). Malignant and aggressive lymphomas typically exhibit a higher FDG uptake on FDG-PET scans (3). In addition, certain studies have reported the FDG-PET findings of lymphoma subtypes (4). However, only a few studies have described the FDG-PET findings in T-LBL patients (4,5).
The aim of the present study was to evaluate FDG-PET images in patients with a specific subtype of lymphoma, T-LBL.
Patients and methods
Patients
In total, 9 patients (8 men and 1 woman; mean age, 30±8.3 years) with initially histopathologically confirmed T-LBL at the Korean Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea, between January 2000 and December 2005, were retrospectively enrolled in the present study. The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Korean Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences (Institutional Review Board no. K-1507-002-026).
Histopathological diagnosis
Specimens obtained by lymph node or tumor biopsy were assessed by histological or cytological examination. Specimens were embedded with paraffin and fixed with formalin, and then cut into 2-mm thick sections. Bone marrow (BM) involvement or leukemic transformation (LT) was confirmed by iliac crest marrow biopsy and peripheral blood blast count.
FDG-PET image acquisition
FDG-PET scans were acquired at the initial pre-therapeutic period. Images were obtained with conventional PET scanners (GE Advance Scanner; GE Medical Systems, Waukesha, WI, USA; or ECAT EXACT HR+ Scanner; Siemens, Knoxville, TN, USA). All patients fasted for at least 6 h and serum glucose levels were <180 mg/dl prior to scanning. At 60 min after the intravenous injection of 370–555 MBq FDG, the image acquisition was started.
Image analysis
Two experienced nuclear physicians assessed the FDG-PET images using visual analysis and maximum standardized uptakes (SUVmax). In the visual analysis, an increased tracer uptake pattern (diffuse, nodular or localized) and uptake intensity (mild, moderate or intense) were considered for assessment. The SUV was calculated as follows: SUV = mean activity [region of interest (ROI)] (MBq/ml) / injected dose (MBq) / total body weight(g). Among these SUVs from the targeted ROI, the SUVmax were defined as the highest SUVs of pixels in the ROI.
Results
As shown in Table I, 8 patients presented with BM involvement; 7 showed LT and 1 patient showed BM involvement without LT at the initial diagnosis.
All lymphoma involvement lesions were FDG-avid and the intensity of nodal FDG uptake was variable (mild in 4, moderated in 1 and intense in 4 patient). The mean SUVmax was 6.4±3.3 (range, 3.7–12.2). As shown in Table I and Fig. 1, 8 out of 9 patients presented with hypermetabolic lesions in the mediastinum and intense splenic uptake was noted in 4 patients. A high Ki-67 index was associated with relatively intense and increased SUVmax values. All the images of the enrolled patients are presented in Fig. 1.
Discussion
The present study found two notable points in the FDG-PET imaging. First, all T-LBL patients with involvement of the BM showed diffuse or nodular BM FDG uptake. However, patients with no bone involvement showed localized marrow uptake (case 3; Fig. 1;). Second, with regard to LT, the LT patients presented with diffuse BM FDG uptake (mean SUVmax, 3.7±2.9), while the single patient with marrow involvement without LT showed nodular FDG uptake in the BM (SUVmax, 2.7) (case 4; Fig. 1). In the present study, all lymphomas involving lymph nodes and mediastinal lesions were FDG-avid. These results were concordant with previous studies (4,5). In addition, the present study provides a more detailed FDG uptake pattern with BM involvement and LT status. In conclusion, it is possible to use FDG-PET for the evaluation of the disease extent of T-LBL. Furthermore, it could provide a diagnostic clue for BM involvement or LT in T-LBL patients.
References
Hoelzer D, Gökbuget N, Digel W, Faak T, Kneba M, Reutzel R, Romejko-Jarosinska J, Zwolinski J and Walewski J: Outcome of adult patients with T-lymphoblastic lymphoma treated according to protocols for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 99:4379–4385. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ellin F, Jerkeman M, Hagberg H and Relander T: Treatment outcome in T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma in adults - a population-based study from the Swedish Lymphoma Registry. Acta Oncol. 53:927–934. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Seam P, Juweid ME and Cheson BD: The role of FDG PET scans in patients with lymphoma. Blood. 110:3507–3516. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Weiler-Sagie M, Bushelev O, Epelbaum R, Dann EJ, Haim N, Avivi I, Ben-Barak A, Ben-Arie Y, Bar-Shalom R and Israel O: (18)F-FDG Avidity in lymphoma readdressed: A study of 766 patients. J Nucl Med. 51:25–30. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xiang X, Wang X, Yi Q, Lin L, Zhang X, Liang H and Yang J: Precursor T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma extensively involving the mediastinum, pleura and pericardium: A case report. Mol Clin Oncol. 2:945–948. 2014.PubMed/NCBI |