Open Access

Distant recurrence risk following early ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence

  • Authors:
    • Makoto Ishitobi
    • Jun Okuno
    • Nobuyoshi Kittaka
    • Takahiro Nakayama
    • Hiroki Koyama
    • Yasuhiro Tamaki
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: March 3, 2017     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.5797
  • Pages: 2886-2890
  • Copyright: © Ishitobi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

At present, the risk factors for distant recurrence among patients with early ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) require further investigation. Early IBTR is defined as occurring within 3 years following the initial surgery. In the current study, 40 patients with early IBTR were examined to determine the risk factors for distant recurrence. A node-positive status at the time of primary surgery and the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy following the primary surgery were significantly correlated with poorer distant disease‑free survival (P=0.001 and P=0.002, respectively). Multivariate analyses revealed that the nodal status at the time of primary surgery was an independent predictive factor for distant recurrence (P=0.050). Therefore, the results of the current study revealed that the nodal status at the time of primary surgery was an independent predictive factor for distant recurrence among patients with early IBTR.

Introduction

Breast-conserving surgery is a standard treatment for stage I and II breast cancer; however, 5–10% of patients treated with breast-conserving surgery are diagnosed with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) within 10 years (1,2). IBTR following breast-conserving surgery is associated with an elevated risk of mortality or of developing distant recurrence (37).

The time interval between the initial surgery and the occurrence of IBTR is defined as the disease-free interval (DFI), which is a predictor of disease recurrence following IBTR (36,812), and patients with early IBTR have a poorer prognosis, compared with those with late IBTR (8,1012). However, irrespective of the DFI, the standard treatment for patients with IBTR is surgery is mastectomy. This treatment strategy must be modified if a subgroup of patients with early IBTR, with an equally poor prognosis as that of patients with regional or distant recurrence, is present (13). Therefore, it is important to estimate the risk of disease recurrence in such patients, as risk factors following early IBTR have not yet been elucidated. In the present study, the risk factors for distant recurrence following early IBTR were examined.

Patients and methods

Patients

The medical records of 3,793 patients with breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery between January 1989 and December 2013 at the Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases (Osaka, Japan) were reviewed. Of these patients (ages 28–89), 180 (4.7%) developed IBTR as the first event with no evidence of synchronous metastatic disease, and subsequently underwent salvage surgery. Within this group, the exclusion criteria were as follows: Patients with non-invasive tumors present in IBTR tissue specimens and patients who received neoadjuvant therapy as the initial treatment. A total of 153 patients with IBTR were eligible for the present study. A previous study examined the same patient group, focusing on patients with IBTR that occurred 5 years following the initial surgery (14), whereas, in the current study, 40 patients with IBTR that occurred within 3 years of the initial surgery were analyzed. The present study was approved by the local ethics committee of the Osaka Medical Center of Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, with waiver of informed patient consent.

Patients received a physical examination (palpation for breast, chest wall and regional lymph nodes) every 3–6 months for 5 years following primary or salvage surgery and annually thereafter, and also underwent mammograms annually following primary or salvage surgery. The estrogen receptor (ER) status of the surgical specimens obtained from patients was determined using immunohistochemistry (15), and tumors were classified as positive for ER expression if ≥10% of cells exhibited positive nuclear staining with monoclonal rabbit anti-human ERα (clone EP1, Dako; Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). The human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status of patients' tissues was considered positive if the immunohistochemistry was 3+ or if the fluorescence in situ hybridization ratio (HER-2/chromosome 17) was >2.0 (16).

Statistical analysis

Distant disease-free survival (DDFS) rate was defined as the period of time between the date of surgery for patients with IBTR and the date of the appearance of distant recurrence, and was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank tests were performed to evaluate the differences in DDFS among various patient subgroups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model.

All statistical tests were performed using SPSS version 21.0 (IBM SPSS, Armonk, NY, USA). All statistical tests and P-values were two tailed, and P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Patient characteristics

Patients' clinical characteristics are presented in Table I. Some data was missing (such as HER2 status of primary tumor and IBTR). Within a median follow-up period of 2.2 years (range, 0.1–20.8 years) following salvage surgery for IBTR, distant recurrence occurred in 15/40 patients (37.5%), and the 3-year DDFS rate was 64.3%.

Table I.

Characteristics of patients.

Table I.

Characteristics of patients.

Characteristics of patientsNo. of patients(n=40)
Median age at initial diagnosis (range), years54 (30–81)
p-T stage of primary tumor
  In situ3
  17
  230
Grade of primary tumor
  10
  218
  319
  Unknown3
Lymphovascular invasion of primary tumor
  Negative19
  Positive20
  Unknown1
Histological type of primary tumor
  DCIS3
  Invasive ductal35
  Invasive lobular1
  Other1
No. of positive lymph nodes of primary tumor
  018
  1–312
  ≥44
  Unknown6
ER status of primary tumor
  Positive17
  Negative22
  Unknown1
HER2 status of primary tumor
  Positive10
  Negative18
  Unknown12
Adjuvant chemotherapy following primary
  surgery
  Yes13
  No27
Adjuvant hormonal therapy following primary surgerya
  Yes11
  No6
Adjuvant trastuzumab following primary surgeryb
  Yes0
  No10
Median time interval between initial surgery and IBTR (range), years1.9(0.1–2.1)
Median age at IBTR diagnosis (range), years56.5(32.0–82.0)
p-T stage of IBTR
  In situ  0
  126
  ≥213
  Unknown  1
Grade of IBTR
  1  3
  210
  321
  Unknown  6
Lymphovascular invasion of IBTR
  Negative19
  Positive17
  Unknown  4
Histological type of IBTR
  DCIS  0
  Invasive ductal37
  Invasive lobular  1
  Other  1
  Unknown  1
ER status of IBTR
  Positive17
  Negative20
  Unknown  3
HER2 status of IBTR
  Positive  9
  Negative22
  Unknown  9
Adjuvant chemotherapy following salvage surgery
  Yes15
  No22
  Unknown  3
Adjuvant hormonal therapy following salvage surgerya
  Yes  9
  No  5
  Unknown  3
Adjuvant trastuzumab following salvage surgeryb
  Yes  4
  No  5

a Including only patients with ER-positive tumors.

b Including only patients with HER2-positive tumors. DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ; ER, estrogen receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; IBTR, ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence; p-T, pathological tumor.

Association with DDFS

Various clinical and pathological factors associated with DDFS among patients with early IBTR are listed in Table II. The nodal status at primary surgery and the use of adjuvant chemotherapy treatment following primary surgery were significantly correlated with DDFS (P=0.001 and P=0.002, respectively). Patients who were node-positive at primary surgery had a significantly poorer DDFS than node-negative patients (3-year DDFS, 33.5 vs. 93.3%, respectively; P=0.001; Fig. 1). Patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy (n=13; mainly anthracycline and/or taxane) following primary surgery exhibited a significantly poorer DDFS than those who did not receive chemotherapy (3-year DDFS, 34.4 vs. 77.9%, respectively; P=0.002; Table II). No significant differences were observed between any of the following groups: Negative or positive margin at primary surgery (P=0.58), radiotherapy or no radiotherapy following primary surgery (P=0.57) and basal (both ER- and HER2-negative) or non-basal type primary tumors (P=0.27) (Table II). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that the nodal status at primary surgery was an independent predictive factor of distant recurrence (P=0.050; Table III).

Table II.

Three-year DDFS rates according to various clinicopathological factors among patients with early IBTR (n=40).

Table II.

Three-year DDFS rates according to various clinicopathological factors among patients with early IBTR (n=40).

Characteristics of patients3-year DDFS rates, %P-value
Age at initial diagnosis, years
  <5048.90.870
  ≥5070.3
p-T stage of primary tumor
  In situ or 180.20.110
  250.3
Margin of primary tumor
  Negative66.00.58
  Positive53.3
Grade of primary tumor
  1 or 266.50.770
  358.0
Lymphovascular invasion of primary tumor
  Negative74.90.190
  Positive51.9
Lymph node status of primary tumor
  Negative93.30.001
  Positive33.5
ER status of primary tumor
  Positive72.20.400
  Negative55.9
HER2 status of primary tumor
  Positive71.10.220
  Negative50.2
Basal type of primary tumor
  Yes43.80.27
  No66.2
Radiotherapy following primary surgery
  Yes66.50.57
  No61.4
Adjuvant chemotherapy following primary surgery
  Yes34.40.002
  No77.9
Adjuvant hormonal therapy following primary surgerya
  Yes71.60.460
  No75.0
Age at IBTR diagnosis, years
  <5048.90.870
  ≥5070.3
p-T stage of IBTR
  167.30.450
  ≥254.9
Grade of IBTR
  1 or 275.00.490
  355.1
Lymphovascular invasion of IBTR
  Negative69.10.170
  Positive52.1
ER status of IBTR
  Positive56.40.540
  Negative64.7
HER2 status of IBTR
  Positive77.80.270
  Negative58.0
Adjuvant chemotherapy following salvage surgery
  Yes55.80.210
  No69.2
Adjuvant hormonal therapy following salvage surgerya
  Yes64.80.071
  No26.7
Adjuvant trastuzumab following salvage surgeryb
  Yes75.00.800
  No80.0

a Including only patients with ER-positive tumors.

b Including only patients with HER2-positive tumors. DDFS, distant disease.free survival; IBTR, ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence; ER, estrogen receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; p.T, pathological tumor.

Table III.

Multivariate analysis of predictors of distant recurrence following early ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence.

Table III.

Multivariate analysis of predictors of distant recurrence following early ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence.

Characteristics of patientsHR95% CIP-value
Lymph node status of primary tumor (positive vs. negative)5.2811.002–27.0020.050a
Adjuvant chemotherapy following primary surgery (positive vs. negative)2.9830.750–11.7500.120

a P<0.05 indicates a statistically significant difference. HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Discussion

The present study demonstrated that the nodal status at the time of primary surgery and the use of adjuvant therapy subsequent to primary surgery were risk factors for distant recurrence following early IBTR. It was hypothesized that the nodal status at primary surgery may interact with adjuvant therapy following primary surgery. Node-positive breast cancer patients have poorer prognosis compared with patients with negative lymph node metastasis. Therefore, patients with positive lymph node metastasis are more likely to be recommended for adjuvant chemotherapy compared with those with negative lymph node metastasis. Therefore, multivariate analysis incorporating these two factors was performed, which revealed that the nodal status at primary surgery was an independent prognostic factor in the present study group. At present, the risk factors that follow IBTR and are associated with the DFI require further investigation (810,14) and, to the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have been conducted to examine the risk factors following early IBTR. The nodal status at primary surgery and the use of adjuvant therapy following primary surgery, which were demonstrated to be prognostic factors among patients with early IBTR in the current study, were also associated with primary surgery, but not with recurrent tumors. By contrast, a previous study identified that the prognostic factors among patients with late IBTR were the ER and HER2 status of IBTR tissue specimens, which were associated with recurrent tumors, but not with primary surgery (14). Taken together, these findings suggest that early IBTR is associated with true recurrence, whereas late IBTR is associated with the presence of new primary tumors.

The 3-year DDFS rate in the present study was 33.5% among patients with early IBTR and a positive nodal status at the time of primary surgery. This DDFS rate is concordant with that reported by Wapnir et al (5), in which the 3-year DDFS was 44.9% among patients with early IBTR and a positive nodal status at the time of primary surgery. Furthermore, this DDFS rate is similar to that observed in patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular node recurrence (17) or lung metastases (18). Pergolizzi et al (17) reported that the median time to progression was 28 months in 44 patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular node recurrence from breast cancer (as a part of recurrent regional disease and without distant metastases) who received combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatment. Ludwig et al (18) observed that, during a retrospective analysis, the median DDFS following resection of lung metastatic tumors was 27.6 months.

The results of the current study suggest that patients with early IBTR and positive axillary nodes at the diagnosis of the primary tumor possess a high risk of distant recurrence and, therefore, should potentially receive more aggressive treatment compared with conventional treatment, including novel (neo)adjuvant systemic therapy or regional radiotherapy.

In addition to the DFI, previous studies have demonstrated that the nodal status at the time of primary surgery was a prognostic factor among patients with IBTR (4,19). The association between the DFI and the nodal status of the primary tumor, and its prognostic relevance among patients with IBTR, has yet to be elucidated. In addition, the small sample size, short follow-up period and high frequency of missing data, particularly for the HER2 status of patients [primary tumor, 30.0% (12/40); IBTR, 22.5% (9/40)] were limitations of the present study. For ER-positive tumors, the annual breast cancer mortality rates are similar during years 0–4 and 5–14 (20).

In conclusion, the nodal status at primary surgery was demonstrated to be an independent predictive factor of distant recurrence among patients with early IBTR in the current study; however, further studies are required to support this association.

Acknowledgements

The present study was supported in part by the Osaka Foundation for the Prevention of Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases (grant no. 1601079183).

References

1 

Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, Jeong JH and Wolmark N: Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 347:1233–1241. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, Greco M, Saccozzi R, Luini A, Aguilar M and Marubini E: Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 347:1227–1232. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Haffty BG, Reiss M, Beinfield M, Fischer D, Ward B and McKhann C: Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence as a predictor of distant disease: Implications for systemic therapy at the time of local relapse. J Clin Oncol. 14:52–57. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Komoike Y, Akiyama F, Iino Y, Ikeda T, Akashi-Tanaka S, Ohsumi S, Kusama M, Sano M, Shin E, Suemasu K, et al: Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving treatment for early breast cancer: Risk factors and impact on distant metastases. Cancer. 106:35–41. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Wapnir IL, Anderson SJ, Mamounas EP, Geyer CE Jr, Jeong JH, Tan-Chiu E, Fisher B and Wolmark N: Prognosis after ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and locoregional recurrences in five national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project node-positive adjuvant breast cancer trials. J Clin Oncol. 24:2028–2037. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Anderson SJ, Wapnir I, Dignam JJ, Fisher B, Mamounas EP, Jeong JH, Geyer CE Jr, Wickerham DL, Costantino JP and Wolmark N: Prognosis after ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and locoregional recurrences in patients treated by breast-conserving therapy in five national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project protocols of node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 27:2466–2473. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Ishitobi M, Ohsumi S, Inaji H, Ohno S, Shigematsu H, Akiyama F, Iwase T, Akashi-Tanaka S, Sato N, Takahashi K and Oura S: Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in patients with operable breast cancer who undergo breast-conserving treatment after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Risk factors of IBTR and validation of the MD Anderson prognostic index. Cancer. 118:4385–4393. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Kurtz JM, Spitalier JM, Amalric R, Brandone H, Ayme Y, Jacquemier J, Hans D and Bressac C: The prognostic significance of late local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 18:87–93. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Elkhuizen PH, Hermans J, Leer JW and van de Vijver MJ: Isolated late local recurrences with high mitotic count and early local recurrences following breast-conserving therapy are associated with increased risk on distant metastasis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 50:387–396. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

van der Sangen MJ, van de Poll-Franse LV, Roumen RM, Rutten HJ, Coebergh JW, Vreugdenhil G and Voogd AC: The prognosis of patients with local recurrence more than five years after breast conservation therapy for invasive breast carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 32:34–38. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

van Laar C, van der Sangen MJ, Poortmans PM, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Roukema JA, Roumen RM, Tjan-Heijnen VC and Voogd AC: Local recurrence following breast-conserving treatment in women aged 40 years or younger: Trends in risk and the impact on prognosis in a population-based cohort of 1143 patients. Eur J Cancer. 49:3093–3101. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Ishitobi M, Okumura Y, Arima N, Yoshida A, Nakatsukasa K, Iwase T, Shien T, Masuda N, Tanaka S, Tanabe M, et al: Breast cancer subtype and distant recurrence after ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol. 20:1886–1892. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Alkner S, Tang MH, Brueffer C, Dahlgren M, Chen Y, Olsson E, Winter C, Baker S, Ehinger A, Rydén L, et al: Contralateral breast cancer can represent a metastatic spread of the first primary tumor: Determination of clonal relationship between contralateral breast cancers using next-generation whole genome sequencing. Breast Cancer Res. 17:1022015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Ishitobi M, Okuno J, Kittaka N, Nakayama T, Koyama H and Tamaki Y: Distant recurrence risk after late ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence: Results of a retrospective, single-institution study. Oncology. 89:269–274. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Umemura S, Kurosumi M, Moriya T, Oyama T, Arihiro K, Yamashita H, Umekita Y, Komoike Y, Shimizu C, Fukushima H, et al: Immunohistochemical evaluation for hormone receptors in breast cancer: A practically useful evaluation system and handling protocol. Breast Cancer. 13:232–235. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Hicks DG, Dowsett M, McShane LM, Allison KH, Allred DC, Bartlett JM, Bilous M, Fitzgibbons P, et al: Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American society of clinical oncology/college of American pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 31:3997–4013. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Pergolizzi S, Adamo V, Russi E, Santacaterina A, Maisano R, Numico G, Palazzolo C, Ferraù F, Settineri N, Altavilla G, et al: Prospective multicenter study of combined treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy in breast cancer women with the rare clinical scenario of ipsilateral supraclavicular node recurrence without distant metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 65:25–32. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Ludwig C, Stoelben E and Hasse J: Disease-free survival after resection of lung metastases in patients with breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 29:532–535. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Voogd AC, van Tienhoven G, Peterse HL, Crommelin MA, Rutgers EJ, van de Velde CJ, van Geel BN, Slot A, Rodrigus PT, Jobsen JJ, et al: Local recurrence after breast conservation therapy for early stage breast carcinoma: Detection, treatment and outcome in 266 patients. Dutch study group on local recurrence after breast conservation (BORST). Cancer. 85:437–446. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG): Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: An overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 365:1687–1717. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

May-2017
Volume 13 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Ishitobi M, Okuno J, Kittaka N, Nakayama T, Koyama H and Tamaki Y: Distant recurrence risk following early ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. Oncol Lett 13: 2886-2890, 2017
APA
Ishitobi, M., Okuno, J., Kittaka, N., Nakayama, T., Koyama, H., & Tamaki, Y. (2017). Distant recurrence risk following early ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. Oncology Letters, 13, 2886-2890. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.5797
MLA
Ishitobi, M., Okuno, J., Kittaka, N., Nakayama, T., Koyama, H., Tamaki, Y."Distant recurrence risk following early ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence". Oncology Letters 13.5 (2017): 2886-2890.
Chicago
Ishitobi, M., Okuno, J., Kittaka, N., Nakayama, T., Koyama, H., Tamaki, Y."Distant recurrence risk following early ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence". Oncology Letters 13, no. 5 (2017): 2886-2890. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.5797