Prognostic significance of c-Met, β-catenin and FAK in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma following surgery

  • Authors:
    • Xue‑Yi Gong
    • Ning Ma
    • Hong‑Xu Xu
    • Fan Chen
    • Xiao‑Hui Huang
    • Qian Wang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: January 5, 2018     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.7733
  • Pages: 3796-3805
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of specific molecular markers in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who had received surgery. Immunohistochemical analysis was used to measure the expression of hepatocyte growth factor receptor (c‑Met), β‑catenin and focal adhesion kinase (FAK) in patients with HCC. c‑Met expression was identified to be high in patients with larger tumors, higher α‑fetoprotein (AFP) levels, higher Edmondson grades, portal vein invasion and higher tumor‑node‑metastasis (TNM) stages. FAK expression was high in patients with portal vein invasion, higher Edmondson grades and higher TNM stages. β‑catenin expression was high in patients with larger tumors, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, portal vein invasion, higher Edmondson grades and higher TNM stages. Following multivariate analysis, FAK (P=0.002) and β‑catenin (P=0.006) expression levels were demonstrated to be significantly associated with Edmondson grade. Additionally, the tumor size (P=0.009) and HBV infection status (P=0.002) were revealed to be associated with β‑catenin expression. Kaplan‑Meier survival curve analysis demonstrated that patients with HCC with higher FAK expression, higher β‑catenin expression, portal vein invasion, higher Edmondson grades, higher TNM stages, younger ages and higher AFP levels had significantly poorer prognoses. Cox's regression analysis revealed that the survival period was correlated with the Edmondson grade, age, AFP level, and FAK and β‑catenin expression. Univariate analysis of c‑Met, β‑catenin and FAK identified a significant correlation between FAK and β‑catenin (P=0.015). Correlation analysis revealed no significant correlation between the three molecular markers, but β‑catenin and c‑Met were markedly correlated (P=0.052). No significant correlation between FAK, c‑Met or β‑catenin expression was identified. FAK and β‑catenin expression demonstrated a correlation with a range of clinicopathological factors, and high FAK and β‑catenin expression levels were identified to be correlated with a poor survival rate of patients with HCC. Thus, patients with higher FAK and β‑catenin expression may require more aggressive therapy. The results of the present study suggest that FAK and β‑catenin expression possess more prognostic value than c‑Met expression in patients with HCC.

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most frequently occurring malignancy and the third leading cause of cancer-associated mortality worldwide (1). Treatments, such as surgery, including transplantation, have provided a possibility of cure; however, the high recurrence rate has resulted in a reduced long-term survival rate in patients with HCC (2). The overall survival rate of patients with HCC is <10%. (3,4). Additionally, evaluation of the individual prognostic outcome may aid in guiding surgical and chemotherapeutic treatment. In the present study, the prognostic significance of three HCC-associated molecular biomarkers were evaluated.

β-catenin serves an important role in the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, and participates in the development and progression of HCC (5). Phosphorylated hepatocyte growth factor receptor (c-Met) triggers mitogen-activated phosphate kinase (MAPK) signaling through the Ras-Raf-MAPK kinase signaling pathway (6), and its overexpression is present in the HCC phenotype with poor differentiation and malignancy (7,8). Activation of c-Met signaling and β-catenin mutations are frequent genetic occurrences observed in liver cancer initiation (911). Previous studies have reported that c-Met and β-catenin are coactivated in HCC, and possess a possible correlation with hepatic carcinogenesis (12,13).

Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is a nonreceptor tyrosine kinase that can be phosphorylated, and activated by growth factors and integrins (6,9). Multiple downstream signaling pathways, including extracellular receptor kinase (Erk), protein kinase B (PKB or Akt) and Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate (Rac) have been identified to be regulated by FAK (14). Thus, FAK activation can regulate the adhesion, motility, proliferation and survival of various cells types (14). In a variety of cancers, including breast (15), intestine (16) and brain (17) cancer, FAK has been demonstrated to be activated and/or overexpressed, thus promoting the progression and metastasis of the aforementioned cancer types. Additionally, in certain HCC studies, FAK has been demonstrated to be overexpressed in HCC specimens, suggesting that it serves a role in hepatocarcinogenesis (18,19).

Although the association between HCC and these three molecules has been separately investigated, a recent in vivo study investigated the potential role of FAK in hepatocarcinogenesis, and it association with c-Met and β-catenin (3). In that report, the deletion of FAK in hepatocytes did not affect their morphology, proliferation or apoptosis rates. However, FAK deficiency significantly repressed MET/DN90-b-catenin (CAT)-induced tumor development and prolonged the survival of mice with MET/CAT-induced HCC. In the livers of mice with HCC and in HCC cell lines, FAK was demonstrated to be activated by c-Met, thus inducing Akt/Erk activation, cyclin D1 upregulation and tumor cell proliferation. CAT enhanced c-Met-stimulated FAK activation and synergistically induced the activation of the Akt/Erk-cyclin D1 signaling pathway in a FAK-dependent manner. In addition, FAK was demonstrated to be required for CAT-induced cyclin D1 expression in a kinase-independent manner (3).

Following the review of previous studies on FAK, c-Met and β-catenin oncoproteins, their correlation with HCC has been identified in a variety of studies (12,13,1822). However, the intercorrelation among them requires further investigation. Irrespective of the coactivation of c-Met and β-catenin in HCC or the FAK's potential role in regulation of tumors described previously (3,12,22), those previous studies were mainly focused on identifying the underlying molecular mechanisms of c-Met/β-catenin-driven hepatocarcinogenesis. By contrast, the present study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of these three oncoproteins and the possible correlations with each other in patients with HCC.

Materials and methods

Patients

A total of 86 patients with HCC who underwent surgery were included in the present study. All information and tumor tissue samples were collected from the database of the Department of Pathology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University (Guangzhou, China). Patients with radically resected HCCs who received surgery between January 2004 and December 2008 were recruited. Patients who had been treated with transhepatic artery chemoembolization (TACE), percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) were not included in the present study. A total of 68 males and 18 females were recruited, with a mean age of 50.2 years (age range, 26–77 years). With respect to the basic liver disease preceding HCC development, 65 cases (78.3%) of liver cirrhosis were identified. Hepatitis B surface antigen was positive in 73 patients and 3 hepatitis C patients (88.0%), and 10 patients (12.0%) did not have any underlying liver disease. The median follow-up period was 28.5 months (range, 3–60 months). The current study was approved by the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Tissue sections

Paraffin tissue blocks from all resected HCC specimens were obtained for immunohistochemical analysis. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides were examined to identify normal and tumor tissue. The tissue sections were produced by placing single, 3-mm cores of tumor or normal tissue in a recipient block with manually created holes.

The examined clinicopathological features of the HCCs included the gender, age, hepatitis infection, tumor size, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, histological differentiation of tumor cells according to the Edmondson and Steiner grading system (23), presence of liver cirrhosis, portal vein invasion, hepatic artery invasion, and microvascular invasion (Table I).

Table I.

Clinicopathological characteristics of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Table I.

Clinicopathological characteristics of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Clinicopathological characteristicNo. of patients (n=86)
Sex
  Male68
  Female18
HBV infection status
  (+)73
  (−)13
AFP level, ng/ml
  <50039
  ≥50047
Liver cirrhosis status
  (+)65
  (−)21
Size, cm
  <2  1
  ≤2–523
  ≤5–1039
  ≤1023
Edmondson grade
  I23
  II33
  III26
  IV4
Microvascular invasion status
  (+)4
  (−)82
Portal vein invasion status
  (+)22
  (−)64
TNM stage
  I21
  II31
  III29
  IV5

[i] TNM, tumor-node-metastasis; AFP, α-fetoprotein; HPV, hepatitis B virus.

Immunohistochemical staining

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections of tumor tissue that were obtained from the resected liver specimens of patients with HCC were cut into 3-µm thick sections. The specific antibodies used, sources, dilutions and detection system (GTVisionTM III Detection System/Mo&Rb; cat. no. GK500710; Dako; Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) are listed in Table II. The detection system included three major reagents: Horseradish peroxidase-labeled secondary antibody (anti-rabbit/mouse), 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) buffer diluent and DAB stock solution (a dye). Antigen retrieval was performed with citrate buffer. Sections were placed in citrate buffer (pH 6.0), heated at 95°C for 7 min, removed from the heat for 10 min and subsequently heated at 95°C for 7 min. Sections were left at room temperature to cool and washed three times with PBS (10 mM, pH 7.5±0.1) for 3 min each. The sections were deparaffinized in xylene, and the xylene was subsequently removed using absolute ethanol. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by treatment with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide for 10 min and normal goat serum (CWBIO, Beijing, China; catalog no. CW0130) for 1 h at room temperature. The sections were then incubated with the primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. Then, sections were incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 h in room temperature. 3,3′-Diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride was used as a chromogen, and Mayer's hematoxylin counterstain was applied. Omission of primary antibody was used as a negative control. The distribution of staining for FAK, c-Met and β-catenin was semi-quantitatively assessed by the percentage of positively stained cells. Staining for FAK, c-Met and β-catenin was categorized into four groups as follows: 0 (<5%), 1+ (6–25%), 2+ (26–50%) and 3+ (>50%) (Fig. 1). Two observers independently evaluated the staining results, and interpretation differences were resolved by consensus. Olympus CX23 light microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) was used (magnification, ×200).

Table II.

Primary antibodies used for immunohistochemical analysis.

Table II.

Primary antibodies used for immunohistochemical analysis.

AntibodySourceCatalogue no.Dilution
Anti-focal adhesion kinaseEpitomics (Abcam, Cambridge, UK)ab60941:300
Rabbit anti-c-Met mAbAbcamab510671:250
Mouse anti-β-catenin mAbBD Biosciences (Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA)6101531:400

[i] mAb, monoclonal antibody.

Statistical analysis

The SPSS statistical software (version 21; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used in the present study. The Fisher's exact test was used for categorical variables, and the logistic regression model was used for multivariate analysis. Cumulative overall survival and disease-free survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier estimator method, and survival curves were calculated using the log-rank test. Correlation factors that were identified as statistically significant were included in the Cox's multiple regression model. Correlation analyses were used to evaluate the correlation among the three molecular markers. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Immunohistochemical expression of FAK

High FAK expression was observed in 39/86 HCC cases and low expression was observed in 47/86 HCC cases. The correlation between the overexpression of all three biomarkers and clinicopathological parameters of HCC are illustrated in Table III. Univariate analysis identified a significant difference between FAK overexpression and other clinicopathological factors such as the Edmondson grade, TNM stage and portal vein invasion (all P<0.001). Logistic analysis revealed a positive correlation between FAK expression and Edmondson grade (P=0.002; Table IV).

Table III.

Correlation between molecular marker overexpression and the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Table III.

Correlation between molecular marker overexpression and the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

FAKβ-cateninc-Met



Clinicopathological characteristicL (n=47)H (n=39)P-valueL (n=34)H (n=52)P-valueL (n=32)H (n=54)P-value
Sex 0.249 0.632 0.702
  Male3533 2642 2642
  Female12  6   810   612
Age, years 0.647 0.968 0.129
  ≤603833 2843 2942
  >60  9  6   6  9   312
Size, cm 0.164 <0.001 0.012
  <316  8 17  7 1410
  ≤33131 1745 1844
HBV infection status 0.588 <0.001 0.919
  (−)  8  5 12  1   5  8
  (+)3934 2251 2746
AFP level ng/ml 0.314 0.130 0.014
  <5002819 2225 2324
  ≥5001920 1227   930
Edmondson grade <0.001 <0.001 0.001
  I/II4115 3026 2828
  III/IV  624   426   426
TMN stage <0.001 0.001 0.010
  I/II3913 2824 2527
  III/IV  826   628   727
Portal vein invasion status <0.001 0.018 0.032
  (−)4222 3034 2836
  (+)  517   418   418
Cirrhosis status 0.810 0.058 0.346
  (−)1110 12  9   615
  (+)3629 2243 2639
Microvascular invasion status 0.848 0.098 0.605
  (−)4537 3448 3151
  (+)  2  2   0  4   1  3

[i] TNM, tumor-node-metastasis; AFP, α-fetoprotein; HPV, hepatitis B virus; FAK, focal adhesion kinase; c-Met, hepatocyte growth factor receptor; H, high expression; L, low expression.

Table IV.

Logistic analysis for the correlation between the overexpression of molecular markers and the clinicopathological parameters of patients with hepatocellular carcinomaa.

Table IV.

Logistic analysis for the correlation between the overexpression of molecular markers and the clinicopathological parameters of patients with hepatocellular carcinomaa.

A, Correlation between FAK expression and Edmonson grade
VariableBSEWalddfP-valueOR
Edmonson grade1.8720.6009.73510.0026.500
Constant−1.8720.7586.10210.0140.154

B, Correlation between β-catenin expression and clinicopathological characteristics

VariableBSEWalddfP-valueOR

Edmonson grade2.2420.8137.59710.0069.408
Tumor size1.6350.6246.87510.0095.132
HBV infection3.7871.2479.22410.00244.139
Constant−8.5212.09416.5671<0.001<0.001

a Statistical analysis did not reveal hepatocyte growth factor receptor as an effective model. B, regression coefficient; SE, standard error; Wald, statistic value; df, degree of freedom; FAK, focal adhesion kinase; HPV, hepatitis B virus.

Immunohistochemical expression of c-Met

High c-Met expression was observed in 54/86 HCC cases, and low expression was observed in 32/86 HCC cases. Univariate analysis identified significant correlations between c-Met overexpression, and portal vein invasion (P=0.032), tumor size (P=0.012), α-fetoprotein (AFP) (P=0.014), poor histological differentiation (Edmondson grade) (P=0.001) and TNM stage (P=0.010). However, multivariate analysis identified no significant correlation between c-Met overexpression and clinicopathological factors.

Immunohistochemical expression of β-catenin

High β-catenin expression was observed in 52/86 HCC cases, and low expression was observed in 34/86 HCC cases. Univariate analysis identified significant correlations between β-catenin overexpression, and tumor size (P<0.001), hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (P<0.001), poor histological differentiation (Edmondson grade) (P<0.001) and TNM stage (P=0.001). Multivariate analysis identified significant correlations between β-catenin overexpression, and HBV infection (P=0.002), Edmondson grade (P=0.006) and tumor size (P=0.009) (Table IV).

Survival rates, biomarkers and clinicopathological profiles Clinicopathological factors

The differences in survival rates of patients with mild expression or overexpression of the three biomarkers were evaluated. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves for ≤60 months of follow-up are shown in Fig. 2. The Kaplan-Meier survival for patients with Edmondson grade III/IV vs. Edmondson grade I/II was significantly correlated with the survival period (mean survival period, 18 vs. 34 months; P<0.001; Fig. 2A). In addition, the TNM stage (mean survival period, 19 vs. 35 months; P<0.001; Fig. 2B), AFP levels (mean survival period, 24 vs. 32 months; P=0.038; Fig. 2C), portal vein invasion (mean survival period, 18 vs. 32 months; P=0.001; Fig. 2D) and age (mean survival period, 21 vs. 30 months; P=0.043; Fig. 2E) were all identified to possess significant prognostic value. Thus, Edmondson grade, AFP levels, age, TNM stage and portal vein invasion were negatively correlated with the survival period.

FAK, β-catenin and c-Met

The different survival rates of the patients with mild or over expression of biomarkers were evaluated. No significant correlations were identified between c-Met expression and overall survival rates (mean survival period, 25 vs. 34 months; P=0.254; Fig. 2F). The Kaplan-Meier survival for patients with high vs. low expression of FAK (mean survival period, 20 vs. 36 months; P<0.001; Fig. 2G) and β-catenin (mean survival period, 24 vs. 36 months; P=0.003; Fig. 2H) was demonstrated to be significantly different. Cox's regression analysis demonstrated that FAK (P=0.004), β-catenin (P=0.036), age (P=0.007) and AFP (P=0.027) were significantly associated with the survival period, whereas, Edmondson grade (P=0.083) was markedly associated with the survival period (Table V). High FAK expression exhibited a ~2.107-fold higher risk of mortality compared with that of low FAK expression. High β-catenin expression exhibited a 1.690-fold higher risk of mortality compared with that of low expression. Other factors that influenced the survival period included the age (2.295-fold), AFP levels (1.699-fold) and Edmondson grade (1.632-fold). However, the results of the present study for age as a prognostic factor have yet to be discussed, because it has been demonstrated that the tumor grows at an increased pace in younger people compared with older people in other types of tumor (2426).

Table V.

Cox's regression analysis of parameters in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Table V.

Cox's regression analysis of parameters in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

ParameterBSEWalddfP-valueOR
FAK expression0.7450.2628.08210.0042.107
β-catenin expression0.5250.2504.38910.0361.690
Age0.8310.3067.37210.0072.295
AFP level0.5300.2394.91810.0271.699
Edmonson grade0.4900.2832.99810.0831.632

[i] B, regression coefficient; SE, standard error; Wald, statistic value; df, degree of freedom; FAK, focal adhesion kinase; AFP, α-fetoprotein.

Correlation between FAK, β-catenin and c-Met expression

Following univariate analysis (Table VI), no significant difference was identified between FAK and β-catenin expression, while a marked difference was demonstrated between c-Met and β-catenin expression (P=0.068). However, FAK expression was significantly different compared with c-Met expression (P=0.015) in 86 patients with HCC. Following correlation analysis (Table VII), β-catenin was identified to be markedly correlated with c-Met expression (P=0.052; Pearson's r=0.21), but the other comparison, including c-Met vs. FAK (P=0.855; Pearson's r=0.020) and FAK vs. β-catenin (P=0.164; Pearson's r=0.151), lacked an identifiable outcome.

Table VI.

Correlation between β-catenin, FAK and c-Met expression in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Table VI.

Correlation between β-catenin, FAK and c-Met expression in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

A, Correlation between β-catenin and FAK expression (n=86)

β-catenin

VariableL (n=34)H (n=52)P-value
FAK expression 0.376
L (n=47)2126
H (n=39)1326

B, Correlation between β-catenin and c-Met expression (n=86)

β-catenin

VariableL (n=34)H (n=52)P-value
c-Met expression 0.068
L (n=32)1715
H (n=54)1737

C, Correlation between c-Met and FAK expression (n=86)

c-Met

VariableL (n=34)H (n=52)P-value
FAK expression 0.015
L (n=47)  2324
H (n=39)  930

[i] FAK, focal adhesion kinase; c-Met, hepatocyte growth factor receptor; H, high expression; L, low expression.

Table VII.

Correlation between molecular markers in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Table VII.

Correlation between molecular markers in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Molecular marker

Molecular markerc-Metβ-cateninFAK
c-Met
  Pearson's r10.2100.020
  P-value (2-tailed) 0.0520.855
  No. of patients868686
β-catenin
  Pearson's r0.21010.151
  P-value (2-tailed)0.052 0.164
  No. of patients868686
FAK
  Pearson's r0.0200.1511
  P-value (2-tailed)0.8550.164
  No. of patients868686

[i] c-Met, hepatocyte growth factor receptor; FAK, focal adhesion kinase.

Discussion

A variety of molecular events have been identified to be involved in the etiopathogenesis of HCC, including insulin-like growth factors, hepatocyte growth factor and the Wnt/β-catenin signaling axis (27,28). Specific signaling pathways include Wnt, insulin like growth factor and mechanistic target of rapamycin (2933). Previous studies identified an association between c-Met and β-catenin expression in hepatocarcinogenesis using in vivo models (12,13,22). Shang et al (3) demonstrated that their effects may be regulated by FAK. As the correlation between the three oncoproteins has been established in animal models, their potential prognostic value in patients with HCC was investigated in the present study. Firstly, the correlation between the clinicopathological features of patients with HCC and the expression of the three oncoproteins was assessed. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox's regression analyses were used to assess their correlation with the survival period. The correlations between the three molecular markers were also analyzed.

FAK is a cytoplasmic protein tyrosine kinase (34). Previous studies have identified FAK overexpression and activation in several advanced-stage solid cancer types (12,19). Furthermore, cancer and stromal cells have been demonstrated to be affected by FAK in the process of carcinogenesis; for example, integrin-FAK signaling activated a number of signaling pathways via phosphorylation and protein-protein interactions to promote tumorigenesis (911). In the present study, FAK expression was revealed to be significantly different compared with different Edmondson grades (P<0.001), different TNM stages (P<0.001) and patients with or without portal vein invasion (P<0.001). Logistic analysis demonstrated a significant correlation between FAK and Edmondson grade (P=0.002). Following Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis, different survival rates were identified between subjects with high and low FAK expression (mean survival period, 20 vs. 36 months; P<0.001). Furthermore, Cox's regression analysis revealed a correlation between FAK expression and the survival period; it appears that patients with high FAK expression have a ~2.107-fold higher risk of mortality compared with that of patients with low FAK expression (P=0.004). Thus, the results of the present study suggest that FAK is correlated with certain clinicopathological features of patients with HCC. Notably, FAK expression was identified to be correlated with the survival period, indicating its potential prognostic value in patients with HCC.

c-Met tyrosine kinase is a cell surface receptor for hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) (35). HGF is secreted by mesenchymal cells that are regenerated in the liver (35). c-Met activation by HGF can induce cell scattering, invasion, evasion from apoptosis and angiogenesis, thus acting as promoter of cancer dissemination (20). The HGF/c-Met signaling pathway has been demonstrated to simultaneously activate multiple signal transduction pathways that promote cancer cell infiltration (3641). In addition, genetic mutations of the c-Met receptor and its overexpression have been reported in various cancer types, including papillary renal, pulmonary, gastric and hepatic cancer (3642). According to the potential role of c-Met in liver regeneration, its correlation with cirrhosis should have been easily identified in the present study; however, no correlation was identified between the two. By contrast, c-Met expression was significantly different compared with that of certain tumor-associated factors such as tumor size (P=0.012), AFP (P=0.014), poor histological differentiation (Edmondson grade) (P=0.001) and TNM stage (P=0.010). This indicates that c-Met may possess a more specific role than previously considered. Despite successful detection of c-Met expression differences in the specimens, no significant correlation was identified between c-Met expression and the survival period in the Kaplan-Meier survival curve or Cox's regression analyses. Considering these results, it is suggested that the prognostic significance of c-Met in HCC is limited.

β-catenin protein can be located in the cell membrane, cytoplasm or nucleus (43). In inactivated cells, the majority of β-catenin is primarily located in the membrane and integrated into the adhesion complex, which is responsible for maintaining cell junctions. The remaining β-catenin that is free in the cytoplasm binds to a degradation complex and is degraded. Once the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway is aberrantly activated, membranous expression of β-catenin is reduced and cytoplasmic degradation of β-catenin is prevented. This allows free β-catenin to accumulate in the cytoplasm and translocate to the nucleus, where it interacts with transcription factors of the T-cell factor/lymphoid enhancer factor family to regulate various target genes (31).

Numerous studies have reported that β-catenin overexpression in the cytoplasm and/or nucleus is correlated with cancer metastasis and poor prognosis (4351). In the present study, higher Edmondson grade, poor TNM stage and positive portal vein invasion cases were identified to have increased cytoplasmic expression of β-catenin. Furthermore, univariate analysis confirmed a significant difference and correlation between β-catenin overexpression, and poor histological differentiation, Edmondson grade (P<0.001) and TNM stage (P=0.001). Following multivariate analysis, a significant correlation was identified between β-catenin overexpression and Edmondson grade (P=0.006). Other clinicopathological factors such as tumor size (P<0.001) and HBV infection (P<0.001) were identified to be significantly associated with β-catenin expression. β-catenin demonstrated a significant correlation with the survival period according to the Kaplan-Meier survival curve (24 vs. 36%; P=0.003) and Cox's regression (P=0.036) analyses. Patients with high β-catenin expression exhibited a 1.690-fold higher risk of mortality compared with that of patients with low β-catenin expression. The results of the present study suggest that β-catenin may be correlated with specific clinicopathological factors and survival period of patients with HCC. Thus, β-catenin may potentially be used as a prognostic factor for HCC.

The clinicopathological factors investigated in the current study are generally considered to be correlated with HCC, including sex, HBV infection, liver cirrhosis, tumor size, portal vein invasion, microvascular invasion, Edmondson grade and TNM stage (23,50,51). In the present study, the correlation between these factors and the expression of the three oncoproteins was investigated; in addition, their correlation with survival period was verified. Based on the results obtained, the majority of factors were consistent with general considerations, such as portal vein invasion, Edmondson grade and TNM stage possessing a negative correlation with the survival period in the Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis, and Edmondson grade serving as an independent risk factor in Cox's regression analysis. However, certain factors, such as age and HBV infection demonstrated controversial outcomes that require further analysis. In the present study, different β-catenin expression levels were identified in patients that had been infected by HBV vs. non-infected patients. To the best of our knowledge, no correlation between HBV infection and β-catenin expression has been previously identified. The HBV infection rate among the participants in the present study was relatively high (73/86; 85%), and as only 13 patients were HBV-negative, there may have been selective bias.

Although significant correlations were identified between the three oncoproteins and certain clinicopathological factors, no significant correlation was identified among the three oncoproteins themselves following logistic analysis. Thus, further studies on the three molecular markers were performed. Firstly, the differences between each set of two markers were analyzed, and univariate analysis demonstrated a significant difference between FAK and β-catenin expression (P=0.015), and a marked difference between c-Met and β-catenin expression (P=0.068). Following correlation analysis amongst the three molecular markers, no significant correlation was identified between any pair; however, β-catenin was identified to be correlated with c-Met (P=0.052; Pearson's r=0.21). The established association with c-Met and β-catenin in hepatocarcinogenesis, identified previously (1,10), was consistent with the results of the present study. Although significant differences between FAK and β-catenin expression were established, their correlation with β-catenin and c-Met cannot be concluded.

Other established criteria, including poor histological differentiation (Edmondson grade and TNM stage), were in agreement with the general consensus (23,5254). Apart from different statistical results of c-Met, FAK and β-catenin, FAK and β-catenin performed well according to a variety of statistical indicators in the present study. As prognostic predictors, FAK and β-catenin were effective in the present study; however, coeffectiveness of c-Met and β-Catenin or their regulation by FAK was not observed in the present study (3,12,22).

Certain clinicopathological factors such as tumor size, cirrhosis and microvascular invasion were not identified to be correlated with a high expression of the FAK, β-catenin and c-Met. TNM stage, which has been previously demonstrated to be correlated with the survival period, was excluded from the Cox's regression analysis (23,50,51). Although the association between c-Met and β-catenin expression in HCC was not identified to be significant in the present study, their association should be studied further.

In conclusion, c-Met demonstrated conflicting results regarding its correlation with the clinicopathology and survival period of patients with HCC. As a result, its prognostic value cannot be confirmed by the results of the present study. c-Met displayed variable expression in 86 patients, and was expressed in 54/86 (62.8%) HCC cases. Although no correlation was identified between the three oncoproteins, FAK and β-catenin demonstrated promising results regarding their correlations with clinicopathological characteristics and survival period of patients with HCC. The results of the current study suggest that FAK and β-catenin may be used as prognosis markers of HCC. Considering that single agent or combined chemotherapy were used as treatment for all patients following surgery, and the results of the present study on the prognostic value of FAK and β-catenin, more aggressive treatments such as TACE, PEI or RFA may be required post-surgery for patients with high FAK and β-catenin expression.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos: 81472253, 81472258, 81572424, 81101862, 81172079, 81072047 and 81201930); the Project of Guangzhou Municipal Science & Technology Planning (grant nos: 201607010309 and 201607010164) and the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province (grant nos: 2016A020215047, 2017A020215016, 2014A020212083).

References

1 

Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J and Jemal A: Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 65:87–108. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Kim KH and Choi YK: Long-term survival after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 16:98–104. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Shang N, Arteaga M, Zaidi A, Stauffer J, Cotler SJ, Zeleznik-Le NJ, Zhang J and Qiu W: FAK is required for c-Met/β-catenin-driven hepatocarcinogenesis. Hepatology. 61:214–226. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Bruix J and Sherman M: Practice Guidelines Committee, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 42:1208–1236. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Clevers H: Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in development and disease. Cell. 127:469–480. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Zhao X and Guan JL: Focal adhesion kinase and its signaling pathways in cell migration and angiogenesis. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 63:610–615. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, Hilgard P, Gane E, Blanc JF, de Oliveira AC, Santoro A, Raoul JL, Forner A, et al: Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 359:378–390. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Mitra SK, Hanson DA and Schlaepfer DD: Focal adhesion kinase: In command and control of cell motility. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 6:56–68. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Schaller MD: Cellular functions of FAK kinases: Insight into molecular mechanisms and novel functions. J Cell Sci. 123:1007–1013. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Zhao J and Guan JL: Signal transduction by focal adhesion kinase in cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 28:35–49. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Parsons JT: Focal adhesion kinase: The first ten years. J Cell Sci. 116:1409–1416. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Patil MA, Lee SA, Macias E, Lam ET, Xu C, Jones KD, Ho C, Rodriguez-Puebla M and Chen X: Role of cyclin D1 as a mediator of c-Met and beta-catenin induced hepatocarcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 69:253–261. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Tward AD, Jones KD, Yant S, Cheung ST, Fan ST, Chen X, Kay MA, Wang R and Bishop JM: Distinct pathways of genomic progression to benign and malignant tumors of the liver. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104:pp. 14771–14776. 2007; View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Schlaepfer DD, Hauck CR and Sieg DJ: Signaling through focal adhesion kinase. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 71:435–478. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Pylayeva Y, Gillen KM, Gerald W, Beggs HE, Reichardt LF and Giancotti FG: Ras- and PI3K-dependent breast tumorigenesis in mice and humans requires focal adhesion kinase signaling. J Clin Invest. 119:252–266. 2009.PubMed/NCBI

16 

Ashton GH, Morton JP, Myant K, Phesse TJ, Ridgway RA, Marsh V, Wilkins JA, Athineos D, Muncan V, Kemp R, et al: Focal adhesion kinase is required for intestinal regeneration and tumorigenesis downstream of Wnt/c-Myc signaling. Dev Cell. 19:259–269. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Lee J, Borboa AK, Chun HB, Baird A and Eliceiri BP: Conditional deletion of the focal adhesion kinase FAK alters remodeling of the blood-brain barrier in glioma. Cancer Res. 70:10131–10140. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Itoh S, Maeda T, Shimada M, Aishima S, Shirabe K, Tanaka S and Maehara Y: Role of expression of focal adhesion kinase in progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 10:2812–2817. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Fujii T, Koshikawa K, Nomoto S, Okochi O, Kaneko T, Inoue S, Yatabe Y, Takeda S and Nakao A: Focal adhesion kinase is overexpressed in hepatocellular carcinoma and can be served as an independent prognostic factor. J Hepatol. 41:104–111. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Kaposi-Novak P, Lee JS, Gòmez-Quiroz L, Coulouarn C, Factor VM and Thorgeirsson SS: Met-regulated expression signature defines a subset of human hepatocellular carcinomas with poor prognosis and aggressive phenotype. J Clin Invest. 116:1582–1595. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Cieply B, Zeng G, Proverbs-Singh T, Geller DA and Monga SP: Unique phenotype of hepatocellular cancers with exon-3 mutations in beta-catenin gene. Hepatology. 49:821–831. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Stauffer JK, Scarzello AJ, Andersen JB, De Kluyver RL, Back TC, Weiss JM, Thorgeirsson SS and Wiltrout RH: Coactivation of AKT and β-catenin in mice rapidly induces formation of lipogenic liver tumors. Cancer Res. 71:2718–2727. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Edmondson HA and Steiner PE: Primary carcinoma of the liver: A study of 100 cases among 48,900 necropsies. Cancer. 7:462–503. 1954. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Calabrese CT, Adam YG and Volk H: Geriatric colon cancer. Am J Surg. 125:181–184. 1973. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Ershler WB, Socinski MA and Greene CJ: Bronchogenic cancer, metastases and aging. J Am Geriatr Soc. 31:673–676. 1983. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Ershler WB: Why tumors grow more slowly in old people. J Natl Cancer Inst. 77:837–839. 1986.PubMed/NCBI

27 

Breuhahn K, Longerich T and Schirmacher P: Dysregulation of growth factor signaling in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene. 25:3787–3800. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Farazi PA and DePinho RA: Hepatocellular carcinoma pathogenesis: From genes to environment. Nat Rev Cancer. 6:674–687. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Tabor E: Tumor suppressor genes, growth factor genes, and oncogenes in hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma. J Med Virol. 42:357–365. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Rogler CE and Chisari FV: Cellular and molecular mechanisms of hepatocarcinogenesis. Semin Liver Dis. 12:265–278. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Sung CO, Yoo BC, Koh KC, Cho JW and Park CK: Prognostic significance of p53 overexpression after hepatic resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Korean J Gastroenterol. 45:425–430. 2005.PubMed/NCBI

32 

Pang RW and Poon RT: From molecular biology to targeted therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: The future is now. Oncology. 72 Suppl 1:S30–S44. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Llovet JM and Bruix J: Molecular targeted therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 48:1312–1327. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

André E and Becker-André M: Expression of an N-terminally truncated form of human focal adhesion kinase in brain. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 190:140–147. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Fausto N, Campbell JS and Riehle KJ: Liver regeneration. Hepatology. 43(2 Suppl 1): S45–S53. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Schmidt L, Duh FM, Chen F, Kishida T, Glenn G, Choyke P, Scherer SW, Zhuang Z, Lubensky I, Dean M, et al: Germline and somatic mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of the MET proto-oncogene in papillary renal carcinomas. Nat Genet. 16:68–73. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Schmidt L, Junker K, Weirich G, Glenn G, Choyke P, Lubensky I, Zhuang Z, Jeffers M, Vande Woude G, Neumann H, et al: Two North American families with hereditary papillary renal carcinoma and identical novel mutations in the MET proto-oncogene. Cancer Res. 58:1719–1722. 1998.PubMed/NCBI

38 

Park WS, Dong SM, Kim SY, Na EY, Shin MS, Pi JH, Kim BJ, Bae JH, Hong YK, Lee KS, et al: Somatic mutations in the kinase domain of the Met/hepatocyte growth factor receptor gene in childhood hepatocellular carcinomas. Cancer Res. 59:307–310. 1999.PubMed/NCBI

39 

Ma PC, Kijima T, Maulik G, et al: c-MET mutational analysis in small cell lung cancer: Novel juxtamembrane domain mutations regulating cytoskeletal functions. Cancer Res. 63:6272–6281. 2003.PubMed/NCBI

40 

Ma PC, Jagdeesh S, Jagadeeswaran R, Fox EA, Christensen J, Maulik G, Naoki K, Schaefer E, Lader A, Richards W, et al: c-MET expression/activation, functions and mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res. 44:pp. 18752004;

41 

Lee JH, Han SU, Cho H, Jennings B, Gerrard B, Dean M, Schmidt L, Zbar B and Vande Woude GF: A novel germ line juxtamembrane Met mutation in human gastric cancer. Oncogene. 19:4947–4953. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Christensen JG, Burrows J and Salgia R: c-Met as a target for human cancer and characterization of inhibitors for therapeutic intervention. Cancer Lett. 225:1–26. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Chen Z, He X, Jia M, Liu Y, Qu D, Wu D, Wu P, Ni C, Zhang Z, Ye J, et al: β-catenin overexpression in the nucleus predicts progress disease and unfavourable survival in colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis. PLoS One. 8:e638542013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Gough NR: Focus issue: Wnt and beta-catenin signaling in development and disease. Sci Signal. 5:eg22012.PubMed/NCBI

45 

Inagawa S, Itabashi M, Adachi S, Kawamoto T, Hori M, Shimazaki J, Yoshimi F and Fukao K: Expression and prognostic roles of beta-catenin in hepatocellular carcinoma: Correlation with tumor progression and postoperative survival. Clin Cancer Res. 8:450–456. 2002.PubMed/NCBI

46 

Liu L, Zhu XD, Wang WQ, Shen Y, Qin Y, Ren ZG, Sun HC and Tang ZY: Activation of beta-catenin by hypoxia in hepatocellular carcinoma contributes to enhanced metastatic potential and poor prognosis. Clin Cancer Res. 16:2740–2750. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Lee JM, Yang J, Newell P, Singh S, Parwani A, Friedman SL, Nejak-Bowen KN and Monga SP: β-Catenin signaling in hepatocellular cancer: Implications in inflammation, fibrosis, and proliferation. Cancer Lett. 343:90–97. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Jin J, Jung HY, Wang Y, Xie J, Yeom YI, Jang JJ and Lee KB: Nuclear expression of phosphorylated TRAF2- and NCK-interacting kinase in hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with poor prognosis. Path Res Pract. 210:621–627. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

49 

Zulehner G, Mikula M, Schneller D, van Zijl F, Huber H, Sieghart W, Grasl-Kraupp B, Waldhör T, Peck-Radosavljevic M, Beug H and Mikulits W: Nuclear beta-catenin induces an early liver progenitor phenotype in hepatocellular carcinoma and promotes tumor recurrence. Am J Pathol. 176:472–481. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

50 

Liver cancer study group of Japan, . The general rules for the clinical and pathological study of primary liver cancer. 3rd. Kanehara Shuppan; Tokyo: 1992

51 

Sumie S, Kuromatsu R, Okuda K, Ando E, Takata A, Fukushima N, Watanabe Y, Kojiro M and Sata M: Microvascular invasion in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and its predictable clinicopathological factors. Ann Surg Oncol. 15:1375–1382. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

52 

Minagawa M, Ikai I, Matsuyama Y, Yamaoka Y and Makuuchi M: Staging of hepatocellular carcinoma: Assessment of the Japanese TNM and AJCC/UICC TNM systems in a cohort of 13,772 patients in Japan. Ann Surg. 245:909–922. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

53 

Henderson J, Sherman M, Tavill A, Abecassis M, Chejfec G and Gramlich T: AHPBA/AJCC consensus conference on staging of hepatocellular carcinoma: Consensus statement. HPB(Oxford). 5:243–250. 2003.PubMed/NCBI

54 

Leung TW, Tang AM, Zee B, Lau WY, Lai PB, Leung KL, Lau JT, Yu SC and Johnson PJ: Construction of the Chinese University Prognostic Index for hepatocellular carcinoma and comparison with the TNM staging system, the Okuda staging system, and the Cancer of the Liver Italian Program staging system: A study based on 926 patients. Cancer. 94:1760–1769. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

March-2018
Volume 15 Issue 3

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Gong XY, Ma N, Xu HX, Chen F, Huang XH and Wang Q: Prognostic significance of c-Met, β-catenin and FAK in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma following surgery. Oncol Lett 15: 3796-3805, 2018
APA
Gong, X., Ma, N., Xu, H., Chen, F., Huang, X., & Wang, Q. (2018). Prognostic significance of c-Met, β-catenin and FAK in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma following surgery. Oncology Letters, 15, 3796-3805. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.7733
MLA
Gong, X., Ma, N., Xu, H., Chen, F., Huang, X., Wang, Q."Prognostic significance of c-Met, β-catenin and FAK in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma following surgery". Oncology Letters 15.3 (2018): 3796-3805.
Chicago
Gong, X., Ma, N., Xu, H., Chen, F., Huang, X., Wang, Q."Prognostic significance of c-Met, β-catenin and FAK in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma following surgery". Oncology Letters 15, no. 3 (2018): 3796-3805. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.7733