Open Access

Prognostic analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma on the background of liver cirrhosis via contrast-enhanced ultrasound and pathology

  • Authors:
    • Yukai He
    • Fenghua Liu
    • Shaofeng Mou
    • Qingyan Li
    • Sikui Wang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: January 12, 2018     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.7792
  • Pages: 3746-3752
  • Copyright: © He et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the correlation between the quantitative parameters of contrast-enhancement ultrasound for primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and biological manifestations of tumor (Ki-67), and to explore the related risk factors of primary hepatocellular carcinoma, so as to provide the theoretical basis for the further study on contrast-enhancement ultrasound manifestations, clinical features and prognosis of HCC. The patients with HCC confirmed by operation or puncture were collected, and those with the background of liver cirrhosis and immunohistochemical staining for tumor sample sections were selected. H&E staining sections of pathological tissues of tumor samples were observed, whether there was any microvessel invasion (MVI) was recorded, the microvessel density (MVD) was counted and the recurrence situations after liver cancer operation was followed up. The change in size of tumor at arterial phase in contrast-enhancement ultrasound, enhancement mode and form at arterial phase, and whether there were tortuous vessels inside or not, and the enhancement intensity, extinction time and extinction intensity at portal phase were observed. The relationship between the parameters of contrast-enhancement ultrasound and Ki-67, AFP, MVD, MVI, tissue differentiation degree of tumor samples and recurrence was analyzed. Under the background of liver cirrhosis, there were significant differences in different enhancement modes and quantification parameters of contrast-enhancement ultrasound for HCC with different expression of Ki-67. Those with obvious tumor enlargement, inhomogeneous enhancement at arterial phase and irregular enhancement form at arterial phase after contrast-enhancement ultrasound had a high incidence of positive Ki-67 and a high early recurrence rate. The inhomogeneous enhancement at arterial phase might predict the proliferative activity and recurrence time of tumor cells; irregular enhancement form at arterial phase might indicate tumor MVI; and the low enhancement of tumor at portal phase may predict a lower degree of tissue differentiation, a higher tumor malignancy and poor prognosis. The incidence of positive Ki-67 under the background of liver cirrhosis is high, indicating poor prognosis. The enhancement mode and parameters of contrast-enhancement ultrasound for HCC may help evaluate the clinical biological manifestations of HCC and predict the postoperative recurrence of HCC.

Introduction

Primary liver cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in the world, among which hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for approximately 70–85% (1). Surgical operation, local ablation, radiotherapy and chemotherapy provide opportunities to cure or prolong the survival time of patients. However, the 5-year recurrence rate after primary liver cancer operation is as high as 45–60%, seriously affecting the prognosis of patients with liver cancer (24). Therefore, searching for the indexes for evaluating the poor prognosis of HCC, such as proliferative activity and early recurrence, is of significance for the tumor staging, selection of treatment plan and prognosis.

Ki-67 is a kind of nuclear antibody Ki-67 protein, mainly existing in the dense fibrillar components of nucleoli and cortices, which is a reliable index of detecting the tumor cell proliferative activity (5). The biological manifestations of tumor are closely related to its proliferative activity. The higher the expression of Ki-67 is, the faster the tumor cell proliferation will be and the higher the probability of metastasis will also be (6,7). However, there are few studies on the correlation between contrast-enhancement ultrasound of HCC and Ki-67 immunohistochemistry and other prognostic factors.

Compared with enhancement MRI/CT, PET and other examinations, contrast-enhancement ultrasound (CEUS) is characterized by the convenient and efficient application, wide indications and no radiation, and it can show the whole process of contrast enhancement for tumor and liver parenchyma in a real-time and dynamic manner, which not only improves the value of diagnosis and differential diagnosis, but also indirectly reflects some biological manifestations of tumors (810). In the field of contrast-enhancement ultrasound, there are some scholars who use special computer software to conduct the quantization parameter analysis for CEUS images of HCC, establish the peak intensity curve, and study the relationship between CEUS parameters on the curve and microvessel density (MVD), microvessel invasion (MVI) and tumor tissue differentiation degree (1114). These factors are associated with the recurrence of liver cancer and the survival time of liver cancer patients.

This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the enhancement mode and parameters of CEUS for HCC and the prognostic factors and clinical recurrence, and evaluate the biological behavior and prognosis of liver cancer from the perspective of ultrasonography, so as to provide new non-invasive evaluation indexes of prognosis.

Patients and methods

Subjects

One hundred and eighty patients with HCC confirmed by operation or puncture were collected, and they all had the background of liver cirrhosis. The tumor samples received immunohistochemical Ki-67 and AFP-labeled staining. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Qianfoshan Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University (Jinan, China). Signed written informed consents were obtained from all participants before the study.

Pathological examination of Ki-67

Each section was observed via 10 visual fields randomly selected under high-power microscope (×400), and the percentage of brown-stained cell nuclei every 100 cells was the percentage of Ki-67. Ki-67 was divided into Ki-67-positive group (>10%) and the Ki-67-negative group (≤10%) according to the percentage of Ki-67.

Microvessel density, MVD

After the blood vessels in tumor tissues were stained by antigen-antibody reaction, the slide was glanced with low-power microscope (×40-×100) to find the area with the highest blood vessel density. Then the stained blood vessels within the field were counted under high-power microscope (×400). The mean MVD of the patients included was calculated, and they were divided into the high-MVD group (greater than the mean) and low-MVD group (lower than the mean).

Microvessel invasion, MVI

Microvessel infiltration means that multiple or massed cancer cells can be found in venules in para-cancer mesenchyme, obvious endothelial cells can be found around the lumen and red blood cells may appear within the lumen. Patients were divided into the MVI-positive group (MVI was found) and MVI-negative group (no MVI was found).

Contrast-enhancement ultrasound, CEUS

Color Doppler ultrasound was used to record the lesion site and size, internal echo and number, and Doppler blood flow signal; and then the contrast agent was injected under the radiography mode, and the timer and recording were started. The sum of two maximum orthogonal radial lines of lesion on the same section was taken as size of the tumor; according to the changes before and after CEUS, those greater than the mean of all change values were enrolled into the significant change group; otherwise, they were enrolled into the non-significant change group. The image at 10–30 sec after injection of contrast agent was taken as arterial phase. The images with peak intensity were observed; if there were low enhancement or no enhancement area in different sizes in the lesion, the enhancement mode was seen as the inhomogeneous enhancement. The irregular enhancement form of lesion was regarded as the irregular tumor form. Whether there were tortuous blood vessels in the enhancement process at arterial phase were observed. The images at 90–120 sec after injection of contrast agent were selected as the portal phase. In comparison with surrounding liver parenchyma, the extinction time of contrast agent was recorded, the enhancement intensity and regression degree of lesion at portal phase were observed.

Recurrence of liver cancer

If the focal hepatic lesions showed the typical manifestation of HCC or obvious extra hepatic metastasis in imaging examination for the first time, it was the recurrence. According to the first time of discovering recurrent lesion, it was divided into early recurrence (≤1 year) and late recurrence (>1 year).

Statistical analysis

All statistics were performed using SPSS 19.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). t-test was performed for the comparison of mean value, Chi-square test for the significant difference between groups. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between the parameters of ultrasound contrast and prognostic factors. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Ki-67/AFP immunohistochemistry

In this study, the clinical characteristics between Ki-67 positive group (Fig. 1) and Ki-67 negative group (Fig. 1), AFP positive group and AFP negative group were compared. There were no statistically significant differences in the age, sex, positive rate of hepatitis B serum marker and liver function Child-Pugh grade between the two groups (P>0.05); but the proportion of high-differentiated liver cancer in Ki-67 negative group was higher than that in Ki-67 positive group, and the proportion of low-differentiated liver cancer in Ki-67 positive group was higher than that in Ki-67 negative group (P<0.05) (Table I).

Table I.

Basic characteristics of Ki-67(+)/Ki-67(−) HCC subjects.

Table I.

Basic characteristics of Ki-67(+)/Ki-67(−) HCC subjects.

FactorsKi-67(+)Ki-67(−)Test valueP-value
Sex (male %)90.01%91.97% χ2=0.230.57
Age45.90±8.7648.86±9.34t=1.740.23
Tumor tissue differentiation degree χ2=16.28NS
  High-differentiated   2.63%15.57%
  Medium-differentiated81.87%79.96%
  Low-differentiated15.50%4.47%
Hepatitis B serum marker χ2=4.260.08
  Positive9969
  Negative  6  6
Liver function Child-Pugh grade χ2=0.020.88
  Grade A9670
  Grade B  9  5

[i] HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; Ki-67(+), Ki-67-positive group; Ki-67(−), Ki-67-negative group. NS, not significant.

Microvessel density (MVD)

In this study, the mean MVD of patients was 63.40, and they were divided into the high-MVD group (greater than the mean) and low-MVD group (lower than the mean) (Fig. 2). There were no statistically significant differences in the age, sex, hepatitis B serum marker and liver function between high-MVD group and low-MVD group (P>0.05).

Microvessel invasion (MVI)

In this study, patients were divided into the MVI-positive group (MVI was found in para-cancer mesenchyme) (Fig. 3) and MVI-negative group (no MVI was found in para-cancer mesenchyme) (Fig. 3). There were no statistically significant differences in the age, sex, hepatitis B serum marker and liver function between MVI-positive group and MVI-negative group (P>0.05).

Relationship between CEUS parameters vs. pathologic histology

The incidence of positive Ki-67 was high for those cases with obvious change in tumor size, inhomogeneous enhancement and irregular enhancement form of tumor at arterial phase, and low enhancement and fast extinction at portal phase after CEUS (P<0.05, Table II). There was no significant correlation between the change in tumor size, enhancement mode and form of tumor at arterial phase and other parameters after CEUS and the immunohistochemical AFP (P>0.05, Table II).

Table II.

Comparison of CEUS parameters in Ki-67/AFP different HCC groups.

Table II.

Comparison of CEUS parameters in Ki-67/AFP different HCC groups.

FactorsKi-67(+)Ki-67(−)χ2 testP-valueAFP(+)AFP(−)χ2 testP-value
Change of tumor size 6.150.01 2.310.10
  Conspicuous4620 4026
  Inconspicuous5955 5460
Enhancement mode at arterial phase 6.570.00 0.131.13
  Inhomogeneous7934 5955
  Homogeneous2641 3531
Enhancement form at arterial phase 7.340.02 0.980.56
  Irregular4921 4031
  Regular5654 5455
Tortuous vessels 2.390.26 1.130.63
  Yes4424 3336
  No6151 6150
Enhancement intensity at portal phase 7.430.04 1.770.46
  Low intensity8139 6456
  High or equal intensity2436 3030
Extinction speed at portal phase 8.120.05 3.120.50
  Fast5524 3941
  Low5051 5545
Extinction extent at portal phase 8.640.04 0.850.67
  Obvious7937 6256
  None or slight2638 3230

[i] HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; Ki-67(+), Ki-67-positive group; Ki-67(−), Ki-67-negative group.

There was no significant correlation between the change in tumor size, enhancement mode and form of tumor at arterial phase and other parameters after CEUS or the MVD level (P>0.05, Table III). The incidence of positive MVI was high for those cases with obvious change in tumor size, irregular enhancement form of tumor at arterial phase, tortuous vessels inside and fast extinction at portal phase after CEUS (P<0.05, Table III).

Table III.

Comparison of CEUS parameters in MVD/MVI different HCC groups.

Table III.

Comparison of CEUS parameters in MVD/MVI different HCC groups.

FactorsH-MVDL-MVDχ2 testP-valueMVI(+)MVI(−)χ2 testP-value
Change of tumor size 0.750.55 7.050.04
  Conspicuous3932 5615
  Inconspicuous5356 7435
Enhancement mode at arterial phase 0.340.69 3.500.16
  Inhomogeneous5954 8726
  Homogeneous3334 4324
Enhancement form at arterial phase 0.720.45 5.700.01
  Irregular4133 6014
  Regular5155 7036
Tortuous vessels 0.130.56 5.700.01
  Yes3935 6014
  No5353 7036
Enhancement intensity at portal phase 1.550.32 3.120.14
  Low intensity6557 9329
  High or equal intensity2731 3721
Extinction speed at portal phase 2.310.42 3.540.03
  Fast4045 6717
  Low5243 6333
Extinction extent at portal phase 1.750.33 3.880.14
  Obvious6557 9229
  None or slight2731 3821

[i] HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; CEUS, contrast-enhancement ultrasound; H-MVD, high microvessel density; L-MVD, low microvessel density; MVI(+), microvessel invasion-positive group; MVI(−), microvessel invasion-negative group.

The tissue differentiation degree of tumor samples was lower for those cases with inhomogeneous enhancement and irregular enhancement form of tumor at arterial phase, tortuous vessels inside, low enhancement and fast extinction at portal phase after CEUS (P<0.05, Table IV).

Table IV.

Comparison of CEUS parameters in tumor tissue differentiation HCC groups.

Table IV.

Comparison of CEUS parameters in tumor tissue differentiation HCC groups.

Factors Low/Medium-differentiated Highly-differentiatedχ2 testP-value
Change of tumor size 4.340.07
  Conspicuous  64  8
  Inconspicuous  9622
Enhancement mode at arterial phase 6.750.01
  Inhomogeneous10512
  Homogeneous  4518
Enhancement form at arterial phase 5.120.04
  Irregular  66  8
  Regular  8422
Tortuous vessels 7.130.03
  Yes  64  7
  No  8623
Enhancement intensity at portal phase 6.450.01
  Low intensity10213
  High or equal intensity  4817
Extinction speed at portal phase 6.830.00
  Fast10612
  Low  4418
Extinction extent at portal phase 4.270.04
  Obvious  68  9
  None or slight  8221

[i] HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; CEUS, contrast-enhancement ultrasound.

CEUS parameters vs. recurrence of liver cancer

The recurrence time was shorter for those cases with inhomogeneous enhancement of tumor at arterial phase in CEUS (P<0.05, Table V and Fig. 4).

Table V.

Comparison of CEUS parameters in different recurrence conditions of HCC groups.

Table V.

Comparison of CEUS parameters in different recurrence conditions of HCC groups.

FactorsEarly recurrenceLate recurrenceNo recurrenceχ2 testP-value
Change of tumor size 1.900.43
  Conspicuous26  838
  Inconspicuous351756
Enhancement mode at arterial phase 7.840.04
  Inhomogeneous401059
  Homogeneous211535
Enhancement form at arterial phase 5.870.07
  Irregular28  742
  Regular331852
Tortuous vessels 4.300.38
  Yes29  935
  No321659
Enhancement intensity at portal phase 4.120.30
  Low intensity401261
  High or equal intensity211333
Extinction speed at portal phase 5.130.24
  Fast30  841
  Low311753
Extinction extent at portal phase 3.070.36
  Obvious401259
  None or slight211335

[i] HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; CEUS, contrast-enhancement ultrasound.

Logistic regression for prognostic factors of HCC

Logistic regression showed that the inhomogeneous enhancement inside at the arterial phase in CEUS was more helpful to suggest positive Ki-67 and early recurrence; irregular enhancement form at arterial phase suggested a higher risk of MVI; the low enhancement at portal phase might be a parameter suggesting low tissue differentiation degree (P<0.05, Table VI).

Table VI.

Logistic regression of HCC prognosis factors.

Table VI.

Logistic regression of HCC prognosis factors.

Factorsr-valueWald valueP-valueOR
Ki-67
  Inhomogeneous enhancement mode at arterial phase1.1526.39NS2.78
MVI
  Irregular enhancement form at arterial phase1.2617.35NS3.10
Tumor tissue differentiation
  Inhomogeneous enhancement mode at arterial phase1.20   7.030.023.25
  Low intensity enhancement at portal phase1.5512.39NS4.23

[i] HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; MVI, microvessel invasion; OR, odds ratio. NS, not significant.

Discussion

Approximately 740,000 people die from primary HCC around the world every year, and the patients in China account for more than 50% of the global total (2). The high postoperative recurrence rate of liver cancer is the main factor influencing the survival rate of patients with liver cancer. Early prediction of related risk factors to postoperative recurrence of liver cancer is of great clinical significance, and examining the postoperative recurrence as soon as possible and taking treatment measures timely can effectively improve the prognosis of patients with liver cancer (4).

The prognosis of HCC patients is determined by a variety of factors. Immunohistochemical Ki-67 is a rapid, simple and sensitive detection technique for proliferative activity of liver cancer cells, and its overexpression (>10%) can predict the recurrence of liver cancer after surgical treatment, which is associated with the mortality of HCC patients (57). In this study, the change in lesion size, the enhancement mode and form inside lesion at arterial phase, and the enhancement intensity, extinction time and degree at portal phase were associated with the incidence of positive Ki-67; and the logistic regression analysis showed that the inhomogeneous enhancement inside the lesion at arterial phase might be the best parameter to predict the Ki-67 overexpression.

AFP is an important biological marker of liver cancer, whose quantification and immunohistochemistry is associated with the occurrence and development of liver cancer. In recent years, the studies show that AFP lacks sufficient sensitivity and specificity in the effective diagnosis and monitoring of liver cancer. There are few studies about the CEUS parameters and immunohistochemical level of AFP. The results of this study suggested that there was no obvious relationship between the immunohistochemistry AFP and CEUS parameters.

Tumor growth and metastasis depend on the growth of tumor angiogenesis, and MVD, as a sign of tumor angiogenesis degree, also suggests that it is closely related to the occurrence, development and metastasis of tumors (11,12). Compared with liver cancer patients with low MVD, patients with high MVD tend to suffer from early postoperative recurrence. Some scholars studied the correlation between time intensity curve and MVD, and found that the peak intensity, intensity enhancement and area under the curve were positively correlated to the MVD count (13), but in this study, the change in tumor size, enhancement form at arterial phase and other parameters after CEUS had no significant relationship with MVD count.

MVI of liver cancer means that the cancer cells have the potential of intrahepatic metastasis and spread to the circulatory system (14,15). In this study, it can be seen that the change in lesion size, enhancement form at arterial phase, tortuous vessels inside and extinction time at portal phase were related to MVI. Logistic regression analysis showed that irregular form at arterial phase was the most closely related to MVI. The irregular enhancement form of lesion at arterial phase is associated with the high incidence of MVI from both univariate and multivariate regression analysis, which may be the most valuable independent factor of predicting MVI.

Typical CEUS of HCC is characterized by high enhancement of lesion at arterial phase and low enhancement at portal phase and delayed phase, namely the so-called ‘fast in and fast out’ of contrast agent. However, the high-differentiated HCC may present the atypical imaging manifestations, such as the ‘fast in and slow out’ or ‘slow in and slow out’ of contrast agent (810). In this study, the enhancement mode and form of lesions at arterial phase, tortuous vessels, and the enhancement intensity, extinction time and degree at portal phase were correlated with the pathological tissue differentiation degree. Logistic regression analysis showed that the inhomogeneous enhancement inside lesions at arterial phase and low enhancement at portal phase were risk factors of low tissue differentiation degree. Compared with the inhomogeneous enhancement at arterial phase, low enhancement at portal phase is more dangerous. The study results showed that the proportion of high or equal enhancement at portal phase in high-differentiated HCC group was significantly higher than that in moderate- and low-differentiated group, and the reason may be that: i) high-differentiated HCC causes the retention of contrast agent due to the presence of neat bone trabecula-type cellular bundles and a large number of hepatic sinusoids; ii) with the increase of malignancy degree, the degree of differentiation becomes lower and the abnormal arteries are formed derived from the increase of abnormal arterial blood supply. Normal blood supply in hepatic artery and portal vein decreases, the duration of enhancement at portal phase declines and the enhancement intensity is lower; iii) there are many abnormal new vessels at the center or around the tumor, as well as abundant arteriovenous fistulas, thus shortening the duration of enhancement.

To sum up, this study investigated the relationship between the enhancement pattern and parameters of CEUS for HCC and the prognostic factors and clinical recurrence, and evaluated the biological behavior and prognosis of liver cancer from the perspective of pathology and ultrasonography, so as to provide a new prognosis evaluation index.

On the background of liver cirrhosis, there were significant differences in different enhancement modes and quantification parameters of contrast-enhancement ultrasound for HCC with different expression of Ki-67. The high incidence of positive Ki-67 may suggest poor prognosis. CEUS is helpful to predict the prognosis of HCC. The inhomogeneous enhancement at arterial phase may predict the proliferative activity and recurrence time of tumor cells; irregular enhancement form at arterial phase may indicate tumor MVI; and the low enhancement of tumor at portal phase may predict a lower degree of tissue differentiation and poor prognosis.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Geschwind JF: Locoregional therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterol Hepatol (NY). 11:698–700. 2015.

2 

Gish RG: Hepatocellular carcinoma: Current questions and future directions. Gastroenterol Hepatol (NY). 11:182–185. 2015.

3 

Geschwind JF: Locoregional therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 13:660–662. 2015.PubMed/NCBI

4 

Janevska D, Chaloska-Ivanova V and Janevski V: Hepatocellular carcinoma: Risk factors, diagnosis and treatment. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 3:732–736. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Tawfik O, Garimella R, Tancabelic J, Keighley J, Pinson D, Khan Q and Templeton K: Retrospective immunohistochemical study of VDR, RXR, Ki-67, and Bcl-2 expression in primary and metastatic osteosarcoma. J Clin Oncol. 27:e215162009.

6 

Li W, Zhang G, Wang HL and Wang L: Analysis of expression of cyclin E, p27kip1 and Ki67 protein in colorectal cancer tissues and its value for diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of disease. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 20:4874–4879. 2016.PubMed/NCBI

7 

Saponara M, Di BM, Lolli C, Derenzini E, Pantaleo MA, Santini D, Ceccarelli C, Catena F, Nannini M and Maleddu A: Evaluation of Ki-67 in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). J Clin Oncol. 27:e215102009.

8 

Sirlin C: Imaging techniques for hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterol Hepatol (NY). 11:403–405. 2015.

9 

Dong Y, Wang WP, Mao F, Fan M, Ignee A, Serra C, Sparchez Z, Sporea I, Braden B and Dietrich CF: Contrast enhanced ultrasound features of hepatic cystadenoma and hepatic cystadenocarcinoma. Scand J Gastroenterol. 52:365–372. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Haimerl M, Poelsterl S, Beyer LP, Wiesinger I, Niessen C, Stroszczynski C, Wiggermann P and Jung EM: Chronic liver disease: Quantitative MRI vs CEUS-based microperfusion. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 64:435–446. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Lekovic D, Gotic M, Skoda R, Beleslin-Cokic B, Milic N, Mitrovic-Ajtic O, Nienhold R, Sefer D, Suboticki T, Buac M, et al: Bone marrow microvessel density and plasma angiogenic factors in myeloproliferative neoplasms: Clinicopathological and molecular correlations. Ann Hematol. 96:393–404. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Zhang S, Zhang D, Yi S, Gong M, Lu C, Cai Y, Tang X and Zou L: The relationship of lymphatic vessel density, lymphovascular invasion, and lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 8:2863–2873. 2017.PubMed/NCBI

13 

Poon RT, Ng IO, Lau C, Yu WC, Yang ZF, Fan ST and Wong J: Tumor microvessel density as a predictor of recurrence after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: A prospective study. J Clin Oncol. 20:1775–1785. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Donat M, Alonso S, Pereira F, Ferrero E, Carrión L, Acin-Gándara D and Moreno E: Impact of histological factors of hepatocellular carcinoma on the outcome of liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 48:1968–1977. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Feng LH, Dong H, Lau WY, Yu H, Zhu YY, Zhao Y, Lin YX, Chen J, Wu MC and Cong WM: Novel microvascular invasion-based prognostic nomograms to predict survival outcomes in patients after R0 resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 143:293–303. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

March-2018
Volume 15 Issue 3

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
He Y, Liu F, Mou S, Li Q and Wang S: Prognostic analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma on the background of liver cirrhosis via contrast-enhanced ultrasound and pathology. Oncol Lett 15: 3746-3752, 2018
APA
He, Y., Liu, F., Mou, S., Li, Q., & Wang, S. (2018). Prognostic analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma on the background of liver cirrhosis via contrast-enhanced ultrasound and pathology. Oncology Letters, 15, 3746-3752. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.7792
MLA
He, Y., Liu, F., Mou, S., Li, Q., Wang, S."Prognostic analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma on the background of liver cirrhosis via contrast-enhanced ultrasound and pathology". Oncology Letters 15.3 (2018): 3746-3752.
Chicago
He, Y., Liu, F., Mou, S., Li, Q., Wang, S."Prognostic analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma on the background of liver cirrhosis via contrast-enhanced ultrasound and pathology". Oncology Letters 15, no. 3 (2018): 3746-3752. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.7792