Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Oncology Letters
      • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • Information for Authors
    • Information for Reviewers
    • Information for Librarians
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Reviewers
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Login Register Submit
  • This site uses cookies
  • You can change your cookie settings at any time by following the instructions in our Cookie Policy. To find out more, you may read our Privacy Policy.

    I agree
Search articles by DOI, keyword, author or affiliation
Search
Advanced Search
presentation
Oncology Letters
Join Editorial Board Propose a Special Issue
Print ISSN: 1792-1074 Online ISSN: 1792-1082
Journal Cover
April-2018 Volume 15 Issue 4

Full Size Image

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

Journals

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.

Molecular Medicine Reports

Molecular Medicine Reports

Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.

Biomedical Reports

Biomedical Reports

Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.

World Academy of Sciences Journal

World Academy of Sciences Journal

Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.

International Journal of Epigenetics

International Journal of Epigenetics

Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.

Medicine International

Medicine International

An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.

Journal Cover
April-2018 Volume 15 Issue 4

Full Size Image

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

  • Article
  • Citations
    • Cite This Article
    • Download Citation
    • Create Citation Alert
    • Remove Citation Alert
    • Cited By
  • Similar Articles
    • Related Articles (in Spandidos Publications)
    • Similar Articles (Google Scholar)
    • Similar Articles (PubMed)
  • Download PDF
  • Download XML
  • View XML
Article

Hepatocellular carcinoma cells surviving doxorubicin treatment exhibit increased migratory potential and resistance to doxorubicin re-treatment in vitro

  • Authors:
    • Sebastian Buschauer
    • Andreas Koch
    • Philipp Wiggermann
    • Martina Müller
    • Claus Hellerbrand
  • View Affiliations / Copyright

    Affiliations: Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Regensburg, D‑93042 Regensburg, Germany, Department of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, D‑93042 Regensburg, Germany
  • Pages: 4635-4640
    |
    Published online on: January 26, 2018
       https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.7887
  • Expand metrics +
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

This article is mentioned in:



Abstract

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is an established therapeutic approach for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although patients who undergo TACE may have prolonged survival, there are indications that the malignancy of residual HCC tissue can increase subsequent to the procedure. Although hypoxia, which occurs during TACE due to ischemia, is known to contribute to angiogenesis, little is known with regard to the undesirable effects of chemotherapeutic agents on residual HCC cells. Doxorubicin is one of the most commonly used drugs in TACE. The aim of the present study was to analyze alterations in Hep3B and HepG2 human HCC cell lines surviving doxorubicin treatment in vitro. Initially, the toxic concentration range was determined, and doxorubicin was subsequently applied in concentrations that killed >80% of the HCC cells. During the first days subsequent to treatment, surviving cells had higher expression levels of the epithelial‑mesenchymal transition marker SNAIL, and exhibited increased migratory activity compared with control cells. At 3 weeks after the first doxorubicin treatment, surviving HCC cells tolerated significantly higher doxorubicin concentrations compared with control cells. As a potential explanation for this doxorubicin resistance, significantly increased mRNA expression levels of ATP‑binding cassette ABCB1 (multidrug resistance protein 1) and ABCC1 (multidrug resistance‑associated protein 1) were observed by reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction. In summary, these findings indicate that, following TACE treatment, hypoxia as well as doxorubicin may induce a more malignant phenotype in surviving HCC cells and decrease susceptibility to further chemotherapeutic treatment.

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common type of cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-associated mortality worldwide (1), and the incidence continues to increase in numerous countries (2). In the majority of cases, patients have a background of chronic liver disease leading to liver cirrhosis, which is the main risk factor for the development of HCC (3,4). Currently, surgical resection and liver transplantation are the only curative treatment options (5).

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a minimally invasive treatment that is frequently used to reduce tumor burden in inoperable situations or as bridging therapy prior to transplantation. Although TACE may permit local tumor control and increase survival time in patients with intermediate HCC (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B) (6), there is evidence that TACE enhances angiogenesis in HCC (6,7). While hypoxia, which occurs during TACE due to ischemia, is known to contribute to angiogenesis, little is known about the undesirable effects of chemotherapeutic agents on residual HCC cells subsequent to TACE (8).

The anthracycline doxorubicin is one of the most commonly used drugs in TACE (9). Its main mechanisms of action are intercalation into DNA, inhibition of topoisomerase II and generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), inducing apoptotic pathways (10,11). While a large proportion of doxorubicin is eliminated from the body unchanged, the main pathway of doxorubicin metabolism is two-electron reduction by cytosolic reductases, of which carbonyl reductase 1 is the most important in the liver (10). However, doxorubicin resistance in HCC cells is predominantly associated with the expression of adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette (ABC) transporters such as ABCB1 (multi-drug resistance gene; MDR1) or ABCC1 (multidrug resistance-associated protein 1; MRP1) (10,12–19).

Previous studies concerning the drug resistance of HCC cells have used doxorubicin-resistant cell lines that were generated through constant exposure to rising levels of doxorubicin (13,20–22). By contrast, the aim of the present study was to analyze the effects of single-step doxorubicin treatment on surviving HCC cells in vitro, mimicking the situation of HCC cells surviving TACE treatment.

Materials and methods

Cells and cell culture

HCC HepG2 (cat. no. HB-8065) and Hep3B (cat. no. HB-8064; American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA) cell lines were cultured as described previously (23). Briefly, cells were maintained in high-glucose Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) (Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) supplemented with penicillin (400 U/ml), streptomycin (50 µg/ml), L-glutamine (300 µg/ml) and 10% fetal calf serum (FCS; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck Millipore, Deisenhofen, Germany) and were passaged at a 1:5 ratio every 3 days. To select cells that survive treatment with a defined doxorubicin dose (1 µM), HepG2 and Hep3B cells were incubated with doxorubicin for 48 h. Subsequently, medium was removed, the cell culture dishes were carefully washed with PBS to remove dead cells, and surviving HCC cells (HCCsurv) were further cultured in normal, doxorubicin-free medium. Control cells (HCCctr) were continuously cultured in normal medium without doxorubicin. Subsequently, HCCsurv and HCCctr cells were cultured in parallel and were split when they became confluent. In the two HCCsurv cell lines this occurred after 1 week. Subsequent to splitting, HCCsurv cells were further cultured and regularly passaged in parallel with HCCctr cells for another 2 weeks.

Microscope images were captured using an Olympus™ CKX41 microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo Japan) with the ALTRA 20 Soft Imaging System™ and CellA software version 2.6 (Olympus Soft Imaging Solutions GmbH, Münster, Germany). Images were processed using IrfanView™ software version 4.36 (Irfan Skiljan, Jajce, Bosnia).

Analysis of cell viability and proliferation

Cells were seeded in 6-well plates (200,000/well) or 96-well plates (30,000/well), respectively. After 24 h, analysis of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) secretion into the supernatant (Cytotoxicity Detection Kit PLUS; Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) and a colorimetric XTT assay (Roche Diagnostics GmbH) were used to analyze the viability of HCC cells subsequent to treatment with doxorubicin as described (24). Cell proliferation was assessed using the xCELLigence impedance measurement system (Roche Diagnostics GmbH) according to the manufacturer's protocol.

Analysis of cell migration

The migratory activity of HCC cells was quantified using Cultrex 96-Well Cell Migration assay (Trevigen, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) as described (25). Briefly, HCC cells were seeded into the upper compartment of the provided 96-well micropore plate (10,000 cells/well) in DMEM. The lower compartment was filled with DMEM to study spontaneous cell migration. Subsequent to incubation at 37°C for 5 h, cell migration was quantified by fluorometry with an EMax Microplate Reader (MWG Biotech, Ebersberg, Germany).

Analysis of mRNA expression

Total cellular RNA was isolated from doxorubicin-treated and control HepG2 and Hep3B cells using the RNeasy Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Reverse transcription was performed as described previously (24). Quantitative polymerase chain reaction was performed using a LightCycler Real-Time PCR System (Roche Diagnostics) (24). In each well, 2 µl of cDNA template was added to 8 µl master mix containing primers and SYBR Green (Bioline GmbH, Luckenwalde, Germany). Melting, annealing and amplification were performed at 95°C (5 sec), 58°C (10 sec) and 72°C (8 sec), respectively and repeated for 45 cycles. ABCB1, ABCC1 and SNAIL mRNA expression were analyzed using QuantiTect Primer assays according to the manufacturer's protocol (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany). Amplification of cDNA derived from 18S rRNA was used for normalization (24), with the following primer sequences: Forward, 5′-AAACGGCTACCACATCCAAG-3′, and reverse, 5′-CCTCCAATGGATCCTCGTTA-3′. Results were evaluated using the 2−ΔΔCq method (26). Analyses were performed in triplicates and experiments were repeated three times.

Statistical analysis

Values are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean. Comparison between groups was made using the unpaired Student's t-test or two-way analysis of variance. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. All calculations were performed using the statistical computer package GraphPad Prism version 6.01 for Windows (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA).

Results

Selection of HCC cells surviving doxorubicin treatment

The present study analyzed the effective dose range of doxorubicin on the HepG2 and Hep3B human HCC cell lines. Analysis of LDH release into the supernatant (Fig. 1A) and XTT activity (Fig. 1B) showed that doxorubicin dose-dependently reduced the viability of HCC cells during the 48 h incubation time. Starting at a dose of 1 µM in HepG2 cells and 0.5 µM in Hep3B cells, doxorubicin caused a significant increase of LDH levels in the supernatant (2.9-fold, P=0.0001 in HepG2; 1.8-fold, P=0.004 in Hep3B). XTT activity was significantly reduced by incubation with 0.125 µM doxorubicin in HepG2 cells (60%; P=0.0075) and Hep3B cells (83%-fold; P=0.0003). The determined toxic dose ranges were comparable to previous in vitro studies using the same HCC cell lines (27–32). Phase-contrast microscopy confirmed that, after 48 h incubation with a concentration of 1 µM doxorubicin, 10–20% of HCC cells survived (Fig. 1C). For the next in vitro model that was designed to mimic the circumstances of TACE, doxorubicin was used at a concentration of 1 µM, which was in the range of doxorubicin concentrations found in human HCC explants following the administration of TACE (33,34). HCC cells surviving incubation with this doxorubicin dose for 48 h (HCCsurv) and control cells (HCCctr) were generated as aforementioned.

Figure 1.

Selection of HCC cells surviving DX treatment. HepG2 and Hep3B human HCC cell lines were treated with the indicated concentrations of DX for 48 h. (A) Analysis of LDH leakage of (a) HepG2 and (b) Hep3B cells into the supernatant. DX caused a dose-dependent increase in LDH levels in the supernatants of the two cell lines. (B) Quantification of XTT activity as a measure of cell viability of (a) HepG2 and (b) Hep3B cells. DX treatment induced a dose-dependent decrease in XTT activity in the two cell lines. (C) Phase-contrast microscopy of ctrl cells and cells treated with 1 µM DX: (a) HepG2 and (b) Hep3B cells (magnification, 40x). In the two cell lines DX treatment caused a marked reduction of cell density, indicative of induced toxicity. *P<0.05 vs. ctrl group. HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; DX, doxorubicin; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; ctrl, untreated control.

Analysis of surviving HCC cells in the early phase following doxorubicin treatment

Monitoring of cell growth and morphology with phase-contrast microscopy revealed that HCCsurv cells developed a spindle-like, outstretched, mesenchymal shape within the first 6 days after treatment with doxorubicin (Fig. 2A). By contrast, HepG2ctr and Hep3Bctr did not change their characteristic, cubic and compact cell form during the whole observation period. Additionally, expression of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) marker SNAIL was 1.9-fold (P=0.03) increased in HepG2surv compared to HepG2ctr cells (Fig. 2B). Also in Hep3Bsurv SNAIL expression was 5.2-fold (P=0.0002) higher compared with Hep3Bctr cells (Fig. 2B). Functional analysis revealed similar rates of proliferation of HCCsurv and HCCctr cells (data not shown). However, HCCsurv cells exhibited significantly increased migration in Boyden chamber assays compared to HCCctr cells (Fig. 2C). Migration ability in HepG2surv was 2.4-fold increased (P=0.001) compared with HepG2ctr. Hep3Bsurv exhibited a 3.3-fold increase (P=0.009) in migratory potential compared with Hep3Bctr.

Figure 2.

Analysis of surviving HepG2 and Hep3B HCC cells in the early phase subsequent to doxorubicin treatment. (A) Phase-contrast microscopy of (a) untreated control cells (HepG2ctrl and Hep3Bctrl) and (b) cells surviving 1 week after doxorubicin treatment (HepG2surv and Hep3Bsurv; magnification, 100x). The two HCCsurv cell lines exhibited spindle-like, outstretched cell forms, whereas HepG2surv cells retained cubic, compact forms. (B) Analysis of SNAIL mRNA levels by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction in (a) HepG2 and (b) Hep3B cells. HCCsurv cells exhibited significantly higher SNAIL expression than HCCctr cells. (C) Analysis of migratory potential by Boyden Chamber assays in (a) HepG2 and (b) Hep3B cells. HepG2surv cells exhibited significantly higher migratory activity than HepG2ctr cells. *P<0.05 vs. ctrl group. surv, surviving cells; ctrl, untreated control.

Analysis of surviving HCC cells 3 weeks after doxorubicin treatment

After ~1 week, HCCsurv cells became confluent and required splitting. Subsequently, HCCsurv cells were further cultured in parallel with HCCctr cells for another 2 weeks. During that time, the HCCsurv cells reverted to their original shape. The spindle-like, outstretched cell form disappeared and the HepG2surv and Hep3Bsurv no longer differed from their respective control cells (Fig. 3A). SNAIL expression and migratory potential were similar in HCCsurv and HCCctr cells (data not shown). However, 3 weeks following doxorubicin treatment, HCCsurv cells exhibited significantly higher expression levels of MDR1 (ABCB1) and MRP1 (ABCC1) compared to HCCctr cells (Fig. 3B). ABCB1 expression was 1.7-fold increased in HepG2surv (P=0.029) and 3.4-fold in Hep3Bsurv (P=0.002) compared with their respective control cells. ABCC1 expression was increased 2.1-fold in HepG2surv (P=0.016) and 1.4-fold in Hep3Bsurv (P=0.09) cells compared with their respective control cells. Consistently, HCCsurv cells tolerated significantly increased doxorubicin concentrations compared with HCCctr cells (Fig. 3C). Although XTT-activity was reduced to 33% in HepG2ctr treated with 0.5 µM doxorubicin, HepG2surv exhibited an XTT-activity of 74% (P=0.0001) upon incubation with the same doxorubicin dose. Similarly, impairment of XTT-activity in response to 0.5 µM doxorubicin in Hep3Bsurv cells (64%) was significantly lowered (P=0.0006) compared with the reduction of XTT-activity (34%) in Hep3Bctr cells.

Figure 3.

Analysis of surviving HCC cells 3 weeks after doxorubicin treatment. (A) Phase-contrast microscopy of untreated control cells [(a) HepG2ctrl and (b) Hep3Bctrl] and cells surviving 3 weeks after DX treatment [(a) HepG2surv and (b) Hep3Bsurv] (magnification, 100x). The cell morphology of HCCsurv and HCCctrl cells did not significantly differ. (B) ABCB1 and ABCC1 mRNA expression analyzed by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction in (a) HepG2 and (b) Hep3B cells. ABCB1 expression was significantly higher in HCCsurv compared with HCCctrl cells. In addition, ABCC1 expression levels were significantly higher in HepG2surv cells compared with HepG2ctr cells, whereas differences did not reach the level of significance in Hep3Bsurv vs. Hep3Bctrl cells. (C) XTT activity of untreated control cells and DX-surviving cells following re-incubation with the indicated concentrations of DX for 48 h: (a) HepG2 and (b) Hep3B. HCCsurv cells revealed significantly higher XTT activity than HCCctr cells in response to treatment with the same doxorubicin concentrations, as an indication that HCCsurv cells tolerated significantly higher doxorubicin concentrations compared with HCCctr cells. *P<0.05 vs. ctrl group. DX, doxorubicin; surv, surviving cells; ctrl, untreated control.

Discussion

The aim of the present study was to analyze human HCC cells surviving doxorubicin treatment in vitro, in an experimental setting resembling the circumstances of HCC cells surviving doxorubicin application during TACE. For this, two different human HCC cell lines were incubated with doxorubicin at a concentration that killed >80% of the tumor cells within 48 h. The applied concentration of doxorubicin was in the range of tissue drug concentrations found in experimental TACE models in vivo, as well as in HCC explants of patients after the administration of TACE (33,34). After 2 days, cell culture of surviving HCC cells was continued without doxorubicin exposure to mimic the situation of a single doxorubicin dose application during TACE.

Applying these experimental conditions, the present study observed an increased expression of the EMT marker SNAIL and morphological changes to a mesenchymal cell shape in HCC cells surviving doxorubicin exposure. Additionally, doxorubicin-surviving HCC cells exhibited increased migratory activity. Expression of SNAIL has been found to positively correlate with poor clinical outcomes in different types of cancer, including HCC (35). Furthermore, several studies indicate that EMT is a crucial event in HCC progression, being associated with tumor cell invasion and metastasis (36). Accordingly, a previous study reported that the incidences of poorly differentiated histology and intrahepatic metastases are significantly increased in post-TACE HCC tissues compared with in HCC tissues of patients who have not undergone TACE treatment (37). Furthermore, Zen et al (38) found a combined hepato-cholangiocellular phenotype was more frequently detected in HCC tissues after TACE compared to untreated HCC. In the context of these previous studies and the present in vitro data, one may hypothesize that doxorubicin application during TACE promotes a more malignant phenotype in surviving HCC cells. Currently, the present study can only speculate why the alterations in cell morphology, SNAIL expression and migratory activity in doxorubicin-surviving HCC cells regressed with prolonged cell culture. It may indeed have been an intermediate effect, or trypsinization and splitting of the cells may have triggered this reversion.

However, for up to 3 weeks after a single doxorubicin application, surviving HCC cells were significantly less susceptible to retreatment with doxorubicin. As a potential explanation for this increased chemotherapy resistance, significantly increased expression levels of MDR1 (ABCB1) and MRP1 (ABCC1) were found; these genes are known to contribute to multidrug resistance in HCC (12–15,17,18,20). MRP1, which is overexpressed in HCC (39), performs an important role in the intrinsic multidrug resistance of HCC and is also associated with an aggressive tumor phenotype and has been suggested to indicate a progenitor cell origin (18).

Hypoxia, which also occurs after TACE through ischemia, is known to induce EMT and to enhance migration and therapy resistance in HCC cells (40,41). The findings of the present study suggest that the chemotherapeutic agent doxorubicin may also cause unfavorable alterations in surviving HCC cells. These findings are of importance for the understanding of HCC recurrence observed subsequent to TACE. Future studies are required to analyze whether maintaining doxorubicin levels for a prolonged period, such as with doxorubicin-eluting beads, or switching to other anticancer agents may omit certain pathological alterations found in the present in vitro model. Furthermore, it must be investigated whether such altered therapeutic strategies may improve the outcome of HCC patients following TACE treatment, and this in vitro model may be used for preclinical analyses addressing these questions.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mrs. Birgitta Ott-Rötzer (University Hospital Regensburg, Germany) for excellent technical assistance. This study was supported by grants from the German Research Association (grant nos. FOR2127 and KFO262) and an educational grant from the Medical Faculty of the University Hospital Regensburg.

References

1 

Lin S, Hoffmann K and Schemmer P: Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review. Liver Cancer. 1:144–158. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Mazzanti R, Arena U and Tassi R: Hepatocellular carcinoma: Where are we? World J Exp Med. 6:21–36. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Bruix J, Boix L, Sala M and Llovet JM: Focus on hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 5:215–219. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Hernandez-Gea V, Toffanin S, Friedman SL and Llovet JM: Role of the microenvironment in the pathogenesis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 144:512–527. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Belghiti J: Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Bull Acad Natl Med. 196:97–103. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

6 

Biolato M, Marrone G, Racco S, Di Stasi C, Miele L, Gasbarrini G, Landolfi R and Grieco A: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for unresectable HCC: A new life begins? Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 14:356–362. 2010.PubMed/NCBI

7 

Xiao EH, Guo D and Bian DJ: Effect of preoperative transcatheter arterial chemoembolization on angiogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. World J Gastroenterol. 15:4582–4586. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Park W, Chung YH, Kim JA, Jin YJ, Lee D, Shim JH, Lee D, Kim KM, Lim YS, Lee HC, et al: Recurrences of hepatocellular carcinoma following complete remission by transarterial chemoembolization or radiofrequency therapy: Focused on the recurrence patterns. Hepatol Res. 43:1304–1312. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Niessen C, Wiggermann P, Velandia C, Stroszczynski C and Pereira PL: Transarterial chemoembolization-status quo in Germany. Rofo. 185:1089–1094. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Thorn CF, Oshiro C, Marsh S, Hernandez-Boussard T, McLeod H, Klein TE and Altman RB: Doxorubicin pathways: Pharmacodynamics and adverse effects. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 21:440–436. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Tacar O, Sriamornsak P and Dass CR: Doxorubicin: An update on anticancer molecular action, toxicity and novel drug delivery systems. J Pharm Pharmacol. 65:157–170. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Li G, Chen X, Wang Q, Xu Z, Zhang W and Ye L: The roles of four multi-drug resistance proteins in hepatocellular carcinoma multidrug resistance. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 27:173–175. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Wang J, Chan JY, Fong CC, Tzang CH, Fung KP and Yang M: Transcriptional analysis of doxorubicin-induced cytotoxicity and resistance in human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines. Liver Int. 29:1338–1347. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Pang E, Hu Y, Chan KY, Lai PB, Squire JA, Macgregor PF, Beheshti B, Albert M, Leung TW and Wong N: Karyotypic imbalances and differential gene expressions in the acquired doxorubicin resistance of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Lab Invest. 85:664–674. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Ambudkar SV, Kimchi-Sarfaty C, Sauna ZE and Gottesman MM: P-glycoprotein: From genomics to mechanism. Oncogene. 22:7468–7485. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Ye CG, Wu WK, Yeung JH, Li HT, Li ZJ, Wong CC, Ren SX, Zhang L, Fung KP and Cho CH: Indomethacin and SC236 enhance the cytotoxicity of doxorubicin in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells via inhibiting P-glycoprotein and MRP1 expression. Cancer Lett. 304:90–96. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Park JG, Lee SK, Hong IG, Kim HS, Lim KH, Choe KJ, Kim WH, Kim YI, Tsuruo T and Gottesman MM: MDR1 gene expression: Its effect on drug resistance to doxorubicin in human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines. J Natl Cancer Inst. 86:700–705. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Vander Borght S, Komuta M, Libbrecht L, Katoonizadeh A, Aerts R, Dymarkowski S, Verslype C, Nevens F and Roskams T: Expression of multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 in hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with a more aggressive tumour phenotype and may reflect a progenitor cell origin. Liver Int. 28:1370–1380. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Itsubo M, Ishikawa T, Toda G and Tanaka M: Immunohistochemical study of expression and cellular localization of the multidrug resistance gene product P-glycoprotein in primary liver carcinoma. Cancer. 73:298–303. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Chan JY, Chu AC and Fung KP: Inhibition of P-glycoprotein expression and reversal of drug resistance of human hepatoma HepG2 cells by multidrug resistance gene (mdr1) antisense RNA. Life Sci. 67:2117–2124. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Sun BT, Zheng LH, Bao YL, Yu CL, Wu Y, Meng XY and Li YX: Reversal effect of Dioscin on multidrug resistance in human hepatoma HepG2/adriamycin cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 654:129–134. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Yang L, Liu X, Lu Z, Yuet-Wa Chan J, Zhou L, Fung KP, Wu P and Wu S: Ursolic acid induces doxorubicin-resistant HepG2 cell death via the release of apoptosis-inducing factor. Cancer Lett. 298:128–138. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Bosserhoff AK, Moser M, Schölmerich J, Buettner R and Hellerbrand C: Specific expression and regulation of the new melanoma inhibitory activity-related gene MIA2 in hepatocytes. J Biol Chem. 278:15225–311. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Hellerbrand C, Mühlbauer M, Wallner S, Schuierer M, Behrmann I, Bataille F, Weiss T, Schölmerich J and Bosserhoff AK: Promoter-hypermethylation is causing functional relevant downregulation of methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Carcinogenesis. 27:64–72. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Dorn C, Weiss TS, Heilmann J and Hellerbrand C: Xanthohumol, a prenylated chalcone derived from hops, inhibits proliferation, migration and interleukin-8 expression of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Int J Oncol. 36:435–441. 2010.PubMed/NCBI

26 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Al-Qubaisi M, Rozita R, Yeap SK, Omar AR, Ali AM and Alitheen NB: Selective cytotoxicity of goniothalamin against hepatoblastoma HepG2 cells. Molecules. 16:2944–2959. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Fan LL, Sun GP, Wei W, Wang ZG, Ge L, Fu WZ and Wang H: Melatonin and doxorubicin synergistically induce cell apoptosis in human hepatoma cell lines. World J Gastroenterol. 16:1473–1481. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Al-Abd AM, Mahmoud AM, El-Sherbiny GA, El-Moselhy MA, Nofal SM, El-Latif HA, El-Eraky WI and El-Shemy HA: Resveratrol enhances the cytotoxic profile of docetaxel and doxorubicin in solid tumour cell lines in vitro. Cell Prolif. 44:591–601. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Hu QD, Chen W, Yan TL, Ma T, Chen CL, Liang C, Zhang Q, Xia XF, Liu H, Zhi X, et al: NSC 74859 enhances doxorubicin cytotoxicity via inhibition of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Cancer Lett. 325:207–213. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Gambari R, Hau DK, Wong WY and Chui CH: Sensitization of Hep3B hepatoma cells to cisplatin and doxorubicin by corilagin. Phytother Res. 28:781–783. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Shiraga K, Sakaguchi K, Senoh T, Ohta T, Ogawa S, Sawayama T, Mouri H, Fujiwara A and Tsuji T: Modulation of doxorubicin sensitivity by cyclosporine A in hepatocellular carcinoma cells and their doxorubicin-resistant sublines. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 16:460–466. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Namur J, Wassef M, Millot JM, Lewis AL, Manfait M and Laurent A: Drug-eluting beads for liver embolization: Concentration of doxorubicin in tissue and in beads in a pig model. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 21:259–267. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Namur J, Citron SJ, Sellers MT, Dupuis MH, Wassef M, Manfait M and Laurent A: Embolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with drug-eluting beads: Doxorubicin tissue concentration and distribution in patient liver explants. J Hepatol. 55:1332–1338. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Peinado H, Olmeda D and Cano A: Snail, Zeb and bHLH factors in tumour progression: An alliance against the epithelial phenotype? Nat Rev Cancer. 7:415–428. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

van Zijl F, Zulehner G, Petz M, Schneller D, Kornauth C, Hau M, Machat G, Grubinger M, Huber H and Mikulits W: Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma. Future Oncol. 5:1169–1179. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Nishihara Y, Aishima S, Kuroda Y, Iguchi T, Taguchi K, Asayama Y, Taketomi A, Kinukawa N, Honda H and Tsuneyoshi M: Biliary phenotype of hepatocellular carcinoma after preoperative transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 23:1860–1868. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Zen C, Zen Y, Mitry RR, Corbeil D, Karbanová J, O'Grady J, Karani J, Kane P, Heaton N, Portmann BC and Quaglia A: Mixed phenotype hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization and liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 17:943–954. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Hoffmann K, Shibo L, Xiao Z, Longerich T, Büchler MW and Schemmer P: Correlation of gene expression of ATP-binding cassette protein and tyrosine kinase signaling pathway in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 31:3883–3890. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

40 

Zhang L, Huang G, Li X, Zhang Y, Jiang Y, Shen J, Liu J, Wang Q, Zhu J, Feng X, et al: Hypoxia induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition via activation of SNAI1 by hypoxia-inducible factor-1α in hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 13:1082013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Luo D, Wang Z and Wu J, Jiang C and Wu J: The role of hypoxia inducible factor-1 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Biomed Res Int. 2014:4092722014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

  • Abstract
  • View
  • Download
  • Twitter
Copy and paste a formatted citation
Spandidos Publications style
Buschauer S, Koch A, Wiggermann P, Müller M and Hellerbrand C: Hepatocellular carcinoma cells surviving doxorubicin treatment exhibit increased migratory potential and resistance to doxorubicin re-treatment in vitro. Oncol Lett 15: 4635-4640, 2018.
APA
Buschauer, S., Koch, A., Wiggermann, P., Müller, M., & Hellerbrand, C. (2018). Hepatocellular carcinoma cells surviving doxorubicin treatment exhibit increased migratory potential and resistance to doxorubicin re-treatment in vitro. Oncology Letters, 15, 4635-4640. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.7887
MLA
Buschauer, S., Koch, A., Wiggermann, P., Müller, M., Hellerbrand, C."Hepatocellular carcinoma cells surviving doxorubicin treatment exhibit increased migratory potential and resistance to doxorubicin re-treatment in vitro". Oncology Letters 15.4 (2018): 4635-4640.
Chicago
Buschauer, S., Koch, A., Wiggermann, P., Müller, M., Hellerbrand, C."Hepatocellular carcinoma cells surviving doxorubicin treatment exhibit increased migratory potential and resistance to doxorubicin re-treatment in vitro". Oncology Letters 15, no. 4 (2018): 4635-4640. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.7887
Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Buschauer S, Koch A, Wiggermann P, Müller M and Hellerbrand C: Hepatocellular carcinoma cells surviving doxorubicin treatment exhibit increased migratory potential and resistance to doxorubicin re-treatment in vitro. Oncol Lett 15: 4635-4640, 2018.
APA
Buschauer, S., Koch, A., Wiggermann, P., Müller, M., & Hellerbrand, C. (2018). Hepatocellular carcinoma cells surviving doxorubicin treatment exhibit increased migratory potential and resistance to doxorubicin re-treatment in vitro. Oncology Letters, 15, 4635-4640. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.7887
MLA
Buschauer, S., Koch, A., Wiggermann, P., Müller, M., Hellerbrand, C."Hepatocellular carcinoma cells surviving doxorubicin treatment exhibit increased migratory potential and resistance to doxorubicin re-treatment in vitro". Oncology Letters 15.4 (2018): 4635-4640.
Chicago
Buschauer, S., Koch, A., Wiggermann, P., Müller, M., Hellerbrand, C."Hepatocellular carcinoma cells surviving doxorubicin treatment exhibit increased migratory potential and resistance to doxorubicin re-treatment in vitro". Oncology Letters 15, no. 4 (2018): 4635-4640. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.7887
Follow us
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
About
  • Spandidos Publications
  • Careers
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
How can we help?
  • Help
  • Live Chat
  • Contact
  • Email to our Support Team