Evidence for critical role of Tie2/Ang1 interaction in metastatic oral cancer

  • Authors:
    • Daisuke Kitajima
    • Atsushi Kasamatsu
    • Dai Nakashima
    • Isao Miyamoto
    • Yasushi Kimura
    • Yosuke Endo‑Sakamoto
    • Masashi Shiiba
    • Hideki Tanzawa
    • Katsuhiro Uzawa
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: March 8, 2018     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8212
  • Pages: 7237-7242
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Angiopoietin-1 (Ang1) is a binding partner of endothelial cell‑specific tyrosine‑protein kinase receptor (Tie2), which serves important roles in vascular development and angiogenesis. Tie2 is closely associated with the metastasis of oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs) however, little is known about the correlation between Tie2 and Ang1. In the present study, the functional mechanisms of the Tie2/Ang1 interaction were investigated using Tie2 overexpressed (oeTie2) OSCC cells and recombinant Ang1 protein. oeTie2 cells had increased cell‑cell and cell‑extracellular matrix adhesions compared with the control cells. Additionally, the adhesive activities increased following treatment with exogenous Ang1, indicating that Ang1 directly enhances Tie2 functions. In the clinical OSCC data from 10 cases positive for regional lymph node metastasis, all cases were negative for Tie2 expression and eight cases (80%) were negative for Ang1 expression. These results suggest that Tie2 and Ang1 serve important roles in cancer metastasis and may be potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets for OSCC metastasis.

Introduction

Cellular adhesion is controlled by adherent molecules in epithelial tissues, which are down-regulated in many cancers to promote transformation and might profoundly affect cellular migration and invasiveness (15). Since cancer metastasis decreases the patient survival rates, regional lymph node metastasis (RLNM) is one of the most adverse prognostic factors (612) for almost all cancers, including oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Therefore, elucidation of the molecular mechanisms involved in cancer metastasis clearly is needed to improve the prognosis (6,13). We reported previously that endothelial cell-specific tyrosine-protein kinase receptor (Tie2) is related closely to OSCC metastasis using overexpressed Tie2 (oeTie2) cells and its neutralization technique (14).

Tie2 and its ligand, angiopoietin 1 (Ang1), are essential for vascular maturation and blood vessel remodeling during embryonic angiogenesis (1525). Ang1 regulates endothelial cell survival (16), anti-inflammatory actions (2628), and radiation-induced endothelial-cell damage (29). Ang1, produced by many types of cells, has been described as a transcriptionally regulated molecule in several tumors (30,31). However, the Tie2/Ang1 interaction is poorly understood.

In the current study, we showed that the Tie2/Ang1 interaction promotes RLNM in OSCCs by controlling cellular adhesion. Thus, our results indicated that Tie2 and Ang1 are biomarkers for therapeutic targets in patients with OSCC.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

The Ethics Committee of Chiba University approved our study protocol (approval no. 236), which was performed according to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients provided written informed consent.

oeTie2 cells and tissue specimens

oeTie2 cells, which were established in our previous study (14), were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM) (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) and 50 units/ml of penicillin and streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA). We performed histopathological diagnosis of each OSCC sample according to the World Health Organization criteria at the Department of Pathology of Chiba University Hospital (32). The clinicopathological stages were determined based on the TNM classification of the International Union against Cancer (33). Twenty (10 cases each, RLNM-positive, RLNM-negative) pairs of primary OSCCs and patient-matched normal oral epithelia were obtained during surgical resections performed at Chiba University Hospital. The resected tissues were fixed in 20% buffered formaldehyde solution for pathologic diagnosis and immunohistochemistry (IHC).

mRNA expression analysis

Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. cDNA was generated from 5 µg of total RNA using Ready-To-Go You-Prime First-Strand Beads (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Little Chalfont, UK) and oligo (dT) primers (Hokkaido System Science Co., Ltd., Sapporo, Japan). As described previously (14), real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was performed using the LightCycler 480 apparatus (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). Primers were designed using the Universal Probe Library Assay Design Center (http://lifescience.roche.com/), which specifies the most suitable set. The primer sequences used for qRT-PCR were: Tie2, forward, 5′-CCCCTATGGGTGTTCCTGT-3′; reverse, 5′-GCTTACAATCTGGCCCGTAA-3′; and probe, no. 10; and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), forward, 5′-AACATCATCCCTGCCTCTACTGG-3′; reverse, 5′-TTGAAGTCAGAGGAGACCACTG-3′; and probe, no. 61. The transcript amount was estimated from the respective standard curves and normalized to the GAPDH transcript amount determined in corresponding samples. All samples were analyzed in triplicate, and three independent preparations of RNA were analyzed from the cells.

Immunoblot analysis

The cells were washed twice with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and centrifuged briefly. The cellular pellets were incubated at 4°C for 30 min in a lysis buffer (7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4% (w/v) CHAPS, and 10 mM Tris). The protein concentration was measured using a commercial Bradford reagent (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). Immunoblot analysis was performed as described previously (14,3437). Briefly, protein extracts (20 µg) were electrophoresed on 4–12% Bis-Tris gel (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), and blocked for 1 h at room temperature in Blocking One (Nacalai Tesque Inc., Kyoto, Japan). The membranes were washed three times with 0.1% Tween-20 in Tris-buffered saline (TBS-T) and incubated with affinity-purified rabbit anti-Tie2 polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA) or mouse anti-GAPDH monoclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) overnight at 4°C. The membranes were washed with TBS-T and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG as a secondary antibody (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. Finally, the membranes were detected using Super-Signal West Pico Chemiluminescent substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), and immunoblot analyses were visualized by exposing the membranes to the ChemiDoc XRS system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). The signal intensities were quantitated using Image Lab software (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). Densitometric Tie2 protein data were normalized to the GAPDH protein levels.

Cellular aggregation assay

To investigate the effect of Tie2 and cartilage oligomeric matrix protein, Ang1, a ligand for Tie2, on cell-cell adhesion, we performed cellular aggregation assays as described previously (38,39). The oeTie2 and Mock cells were incubated for 30 min at 37°C in PBS containing 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, detached by gentle agitation, washed, and mechanically dissociated to obtain a single-cell suspension. The 3×105 single cells in 1 ml of the serum-free DMEM were transferred to 12-well tissue culture plates and rotated at 60 rotations/min for 30 min at room temperature supplemented with and without human Ang1 (1 µg/ml) (R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) or heat-inactivated Ang1 (1 µg/ml). Three random fields, each containing 200 cells, were viewed at ×200 magnification for the presence of single and adherent cells. The percentage of adherent cells was calculated for each field and averaged (38,39).

Cellular adhesion assay

An adhesion assay was performed as described previously (14,40). Briefly, the cells were seeded in collagen I-coated 96-well plates, incubated for 1 h at 37°C at a density of 2×104 cells/well, and incubated for 1 h in DMEM, washed once with PBS, fixed in methanol, stained with crystal violet, and photographed. The numbers of the stained cells were measured using a microplate spectrophotometer (absorbance at 540 nm and at 405 nm to subtract the background). Before the adhesion assay, collagen I-coated 96-well plates were treated with and without Ang1 (1 µg/ml) or heat-inactivated Ang1 (1 µg/ml) for 1 h, and the assay was performed.

Multiplex IHC

Multiplex IHC was performed on 4-µm sections of paraffin-embedded specimens using rabbit anti-Tie2 polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) and mouse anti-Ang1 polyclonal antibody (LifeSpan BioSciences, Inc., Seattle, WA, USA). Briefly, after deparaffinization and hydration, the endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched by a 3-min incubation in a mixture of 0.3% hydrogen peroxide solution in 100% methanol. The sections were blocked for 2 h at room temperature with 1.5% blocking serum (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) in PBS before reaction with the anti-Tie2 and anti-Ang1 antibodies at 4°C in a moist chamber overnight. For all washing steps, 0.1% Tween-20 in PBS was used. After primary antibody incubations, the Envision G/2 Double Stain System, Rabbit/Mouse (DAB+/Permanent Red) (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used according to the manufacturer's instructions. The slides were counterstained lightly with hematoxylin, dehydrated with ethanol, cleaned with xylene, and mounted. As a negative control, triplicate sections were immunostained without exposure to primary antibodies, which confirmed the staining specificity. To quantify the status of the Tie2 and Ang1 protein expression levels, we used the IHC scoring systems described previously (14,4145). The mean percentages of positively stained cells were determined in at least three random fields at ×400 magnification in each section.

Statistical analysis

To compare the Tie2 expression levels and the cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) adhesive capacities, statistical significance was evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U-test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Expression level of Tie2 in its overexpressed cells

Since frequent down-regulation of Tie2 was observed in OSCC in vitro and in vivo, we previously established oeTie2 cells derived from two OSCC cell lines, SAS and Sa3 (14). To confirm the expression level of Tie2 in the oeTie2 cells, we performed qRT-PCR and immunoblot analyses. Consistent with our previous study, the Tie2 mRNA and protein expression levels in oeTie2 cells were significantly (P<0.05) higher than that in the Mock cells (Fig. 1A and B). Our previous study also showed that Tie2 plays an important role in cellular adhesion. In the current study, we hypothesized that not only Tie2 but also Ang1, the specific ligand for Tie2, regulate cell-cell and cell-ECM interactions (Fig. 1C).

Functional analyses of oeTie2 cells

To evaluate the effect of Tie2 overexpression on cell-cell adhesion activity, we performed the cellular aggregation assay. The cell-cell adhesion activity of oeTie2 cells increased significantly (P<0.05) compared with Mock cells (control) (Fig. 2A and B). We then examined whether Ang1 regulates cell-cell adhesion activity. After treatment with Ang1, the number of aggregated cells increased dramatically compared with control cells and the cells treated with heat-inactivated Ang1 (Ang1 and heat-inactivated Ang1) (Fig. 2A, B).

We then performed a cellular adhesion assay to determine the biologic effects of Tie2 and Ang1 on cell-ECM interactions. The cell-ECM adhesion in the oeTie2 cells increased significantly (P<0.05) compared with Mock cells (control) (Fig. 3A and B). In addition, the cell-ECM adhesion activity of the cells treated with Ang1 increased significantly compared with the control cells and the cells treated with heat-inactivated Ang1 (Ang1 and heat-inactivated Ang1) (Fig. 3A and B), suggesting that not only Tie2 but also Ang1 might be critical molecules for cell-cell and cell-ECM adhesions.

Evaluation of Tie2 and Ang1 expression levels in primary OSCCs and the clinical correlations with RLNM

We analyzed the Tie2 and Ang1 protein expression levels in 20 cases of primary OSCCs, RLNM-positive (n=10 cases) and RLNM-negative (n=10 cases), using the IHC scoring system. Representative IHC results for the Tie2 and Ang1 proteins in primary OSCC are shown in Fig. 4A and B. In the RLNM-positive cases, all cases (100%) were Tie2 negative, and eight (80%) cases were Ang1 negative (double negative expression, 8/10 cases), whereas three (30%) of the 10 RLNM-negative cases were negative for both Tie2 and Ang1 (Fig. 4C and D).

Discussion

In addition to our previous finding that Tie2 is in part a key modulator of OSCC tumor adhesion and invasion (14), the current findings indicated that the ligand of Tie2, Ang1, enhances the Tie2 functions in OSCC progression. Although cancer cells show that Tie2 is related closely to cancer metastasis (14,46,47), little is known about Ang1 function in cancer research.

Ang1 is thought to support endothelial cell adhesion and vascular integrity while inhibiting vascular permeability (18,19,48,49). Ang1 also induces phosphorylation of Tie2 and promotes endothelial cell migration and survival (23,5052). The Tie2/Ang1 signaling pathway is thought to regulate proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells through activation of the p38 MAPK and Akt pathways (53,54). The Tie2/Ang1 interaction has different functions during angiogenesis and differentiation, suggesting that the Tie2/Ang1 signaling pathway differs at the molecular level in several types of cells. Since Kim et al reported a novel Ang1 function as a cell primer (55), we speculated that Ang1 increases cell-cell and cell-ECM adhesion activities through the Tie2/Ang1 interaction (Fig. 1C). Consistent with our hypothesis, patients with OSCC with low expression of Tie2 and Ang1 have high risk for RLNM (Fig. 4).

In conclusion, these data provide new insight that the Tie2/Ang1 interaction seems to have complex regulatory mechanisms, especially considering our finding that the Tie2/Ang1 interaction controls critical behaviors in metastatic OSCCs. While further studies using large cohort specimens are needed to study the Tie2/Ang1 interaction, the current data suggested that the Tie2/Ang1 interaction plays an important role in cellular adhesion and might be a potential biomarker for RLNM in OSCCs.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ms. Lynda C. Charters for editing this manuscript.

References

1 

Jamora C and Fuchs E: Intercellular adhesion, signalling and the cytoskeleton. Nat Cell Biol. 4:E101–E108. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Green KJ and Simpson CL: Desmosomes: New perspectives on a classic. J Invest Dermatol. 127:2499–2515. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Dusek RL and Attardi LD: Desmosomes: New perpetrators in tumour suppression. Nat Rev Cancer. 11:317–323. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

South AP, Wan H, Stone MG, Dopping-Hepenstal PJ, Purkis PE, Marshall JF, Leigh IM, Eady RA, Hart IR and McGrath JA: Lack of plakophilin 1 increases keratinocyte migration and reduces desmosome stability. J Cell Sci. 116:3303–3314. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Yin T and Green KJ: Regulation of desmosome assembly and adhesion. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 15:665–677. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Takes RP: Staging of the neck in patients with head and neck squamous cell cancer: Imaging techniques and biomarkers. Oral Oncol. 40:656–667. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Karatzanis AD, Waldfahrer F, Psychogios G, Hornung J, Zenk J, Velegrakis GA and Iro H: Resection margins and other prognostic factors regarding surgically treated glottic carcinomas. J Surg Oncol. 101:131–136. 2010.PubMed/NCBI

8 

Fan S, Tang QL, Lin YJ, Chen WL, Li JS, Huang ZQ, Yang ZH, Wang YY, Zhang DM, Wang HJ, et al: A review of clinical and histological parameters associated with contralateral neck metastases in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Oral Sci. 3:180–191. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Lea J, Bachar G, Sawka AM, Lakra DC, Gilbert RW, Irish JC, Brown DH, Gullane PJ and Goldstein DP: Metastases to level IIb in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Head Neck. 32:184–190. 2010.PubMed/NCBI

10 

Okura M, Aikawa T, Sawai NY, Iida S and Kogo M: Decision analysis and treatment threshold in a management for the N0 neck of the oral cavity carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 45:908–911. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Greenberg JS, Fowler R, Gomez J, Mo V, Roberts D, El Naggar AK and Myers JN: Extent of extracapsular spread: A critical prognosticator in oral tongue cancer. Cancer. 97:1464–1470. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Sano D and Myers JN: Metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 26:645–662. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Casiglia J and Woo SB: A comprehensive review of oral cancer. Gen Dent. 49:72–82. 2001.PubMed/NCBI

14 

Kitajima D, Kasamatsu A, Nakashima D, Miyamoto I, Kimura Y, Saito T, Suzuki T, Endo-Sakamoto Y, Shiiba M, Tanzawa H and Uzawa K: Tie2 regulates tumor metastasis of oral squamous cell carcinomas. J Cancer. 7:600–607. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Dumont DJ, Gradwohl G, Fong GH, Puri MC, Gertsenstein M, Auerbach A and Breitman ML: Dominant-negative and targeted null mutations in the endothelial receptor tyrosine kinase, tek, reveal a critical role in vasculogenesis of the embryo. Genes Dev. 8:1897–1909. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Suri C, Jones PF, Patan S, Bartunkova S, Maisonpierre PC, Davis S, Sato TN and Yancopoulos GD: Requisite role of angiopoietin-1, a ligand for the TIE2 receptor, during embryonic angiogenesis. Cell. 87:1171–1180. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Sato TN, Tozawa Y, Deutsch U, Wolburg-Buchholz K, Fujiwara Y, Gendron-Maguire M, Gridley T, Wolburg H, Risau W and Qin Y: Distinct roles of the receptor tyrosine kinases Tie-1 and Tie-2 in blood vessel formation. Nature. 376:70–74. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Yancopoulos GD, Davis S, Gale NW, Rudge JS, Wiegand SJ and Holash J: Vascular-specific growth factors and blood vessel formation. Nature. 407:242–248. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Peters KG, Kontos CD, Lin PC, Wong AL, Rao P, Huang L, Dewhirst MW and Sankar S: Functional significance of Tie2 signaling in the adult vasculature. Recent Prog Horm Res. 59:51–71. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Brindle NP, Saharinen P and Alitalo K: Signaling and functions of angiopoietin-1 in vascular protection. Circ Res. 98:1014–1023. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Eklund L and Olsen BR: Tie receptors and their angiopoietin ligands are context-dependent regulators of vascular remodeling. Exp Cell Res. 312:630–641. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Pfaff D, Fiedler U and Augustin HG: Emerging roles of the Angiopoietin-Tie and the ephrin-Eph systems as regulators of cell trafficking. J Leukoc Biol. 80:719–726. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Davis S, Aldrich TH, Jones PF, Acheson A, Compton DL, Jain V, Ryan TE, Bruno J, Radziejewski C, Maisonpierre PC and Yancopoulos GD: Isolation of angiopoietin-1, a ligand for the TIE2 receptor, by secretion-trap expression cloning. Cell. 87:1161–1169. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Jones N, Iljin K, Dumont DJ and Alitalo K: Tie receptors: New modulators of angiogenic and lymphangiogenic responses. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2:257–267. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Maisonpierre PC, Suri C, Jones PF, Bartunkova S, Wiegand SJ, Radziejewski C, Compton D, McClain J, Aldrich TH, Papadopoulos N, et al: Angiopoietin-2, a natural antagonist for Tie2 that disrupts in vivo angiogenesis. Science. 277:55–60. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Gamble JR, Drew J, Trezise L, Underwood A, Parsons M, Kasminkas L, Rudge J, Yancopoulos G and Vadas MA: Angiopoietin-1 is an antipermeability and anti-inflammatory agent in vitro and targets cell junctions. Circ Res. 87:603–607. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Jeon BH, Khanday F, Deshpande S, Haile A, Ozaki M and Irani K: Tie-ing the antiinflammatory effect of angiopoietin-1 to inhibition of NF-kappaB. Circ Res. 92:586–588. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Ramsauer M and D'Amore PA: Getting Tie(2)d up in angiogenesis. J Clin Invest. 110:1615–1617. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Cho CH, Kammerer RA, Lee HJ, Yasunaga K, Kim KT, Choi HH, Kim W, Kim SH, Park SK, Lee GM and Koh GY: Designed angiopoietin-1 variant, COMP-Ang1, protects against radiation-induced endothelial cell apoptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101:5553–5558. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Stratmann A, Risau W and Plate KH: Cell type-specific expression of angiopoietin-1 and angiopoietin-2 suggests a role in glioblastoma angiogenesis. Am J Pathol. 153:1459–1466. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Sugimachi K, Tanaka S, Taguchi K, Aishima S, Shimada M and Tsuneyoshi M: Angiopoietin switching regulates angiogenesis and progression of human hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Pathol. 56:854–860. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Pindborg JJ, Reichart PA, Smith CJ and van der Waal I: Histological typing of cancer and precancer of the oral mucosaWorld Health Organization classification of tumours. 2nd edition. Springer-Verlag; Berlin Heidelberg:

33 

Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK and Wittekind C: TNM classification of malignant tumors. 7th edition. New York: Wiley-Liss; 2009

34 

Minakawa Y, Kasamatsu A, Koike H, Higo M, Nakashima D, Kouzu Y, Sakamoto Y, Ogawara K, Shiiba M, Tanzawa H and Uzawa K: Kinesin family member 4A: A potential predictor for progression of human oral cancer. PLoS One. 8:e859512013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Yamatoji M, Kasamatsu A, Kouzu Y, Koike H, Sakamoto Y, Ogawara K, Shiiba M, Tanzawa H and Uzawa K: Dermatopontin: A potential predictor for metastasis of human oral cancer. Int J Cancer. 130:2903–2911. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Uchida F, Uzawa K, Kasamatsu A, Takatori H, Sakamoto Y, Ogawara K, Shiiba M, Tanzawa H and Bukawa H: Overexpression of cell cycle regulator CDCA3 promotes oral cancer progression by enhancing cell proliferation with prevention of G1 phase arrest. BMC Cancer. 12:3212012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Unozawa M, Kasamatsu A, Higo M, Fukumoto C, Koyama T, Sakazume T, Nakashima D, Ogawara K, Yokoe H, Shiiba M, et al: Cavin-2 in oral cancer: A potential predictor for tumor progression. Mol Carcinog. 55:1037–1047. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Ramanathan R, Wilkemeyer MF, Mittal B, Perides G and Charness ME: Alcohol inhibits cell-cell adhesion mediated by human L1. J Cell Biol. 133:381–390. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Tripathi V, Popescu NC and Zimonjic DB: DLC1 induces expression of E-cadherin in prostate cancer cells through Rho pathway and suppresses invasion. Oncogene. 33:724–733. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Kasamatsu A, Uzawa K, Nakashima D, Koike H, Shiiba M, Bukawa H, Yokoe H and Tanzawa H: Galectin-9 as a regulator of cellular adhesion in human oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines. Int J Mol Med. 16:269–273. 2005.PubMed/NCBI

41 

Endo Y, Uzawa K, Mochida Y, Shiiba M, Bukawa H, Yokoe H and Tanzawa H: Sarcoendoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) ATPase type 2 downregulated in human oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 110:225–231. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Lombardi DP, Geradts J, Foley JF, Chiao C, Lamb PW and Barrett JC: Loss of KAI1 expression in the progression of colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 59:5724–5731. 1999.PubMed/NCBI

43 

Shimada K, Uzawa K, Kato M, Endo Y, Shiiba M, Bukawa H, Yokoe H, Seki N and Tanzawa H: Aberrant expression of RAB1A in human tongue cancer. Br J Cancer. 92:1915–1921. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Baba T, Sakamoto Y, Kasamatsu A, Minakawa Y, Yokota S, Higo M, Yokoe H, Ogawara K, Shiiba M, Tanzawa H and Uzawa K: Persephin: A potential key component in human oral cancer progression through the RET receptor tyrosine kinase-mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway. Mol Carcinog. 54:608–617. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Ishige S, Kasamatsu A, Ogoshi K, Saito Y, Usukura K, Yokoe H, Kouzu Y, Koike H, Sakamoto Y, Ogawara K, et al: Decreased expression of kallikrein-related peptidase 13: Possible contribution to metastasis of human oral cancer. Mol Carcinog. 53:557–565. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Saharinen P, Eklund L, Miettinen J, Wirkkala R, Anisimov A, Winderlich M, Nottebaum A, Vestweber D, Deutsch U, Koh GY, et al: Angiopoietins assemble distinct Tie2 signalling complexes in endothelial cell-cell and cell-matrix contacts. Nat Cell Biol. 10:527–537. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Buehler D, Rush P, Hasenstein JR, Rice SR, Hafez GR, Longley BJ and Kozak KR: Expression of angiopoietin-TIE system components in angiosarcoma. Mod Pathol. 26:1032–1040. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Wong AL, Haroon ZA, Werner S, Dewhirst MW, Greenberg CS and Peters KG: Tie2 expression and phosphorylation in angiogenic and quiescent adult tissues. Circ Res. 81:567–574. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

49 

Thurston G, Suri C, Smith K, McClain J, Sato TN, Yancopoulos GD and McDonald DM: Leakage-resistant blood vessels in mice transgenically overexpressing angiopoietin-1. Science. 286:2511–2514. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

50 

Koblizek TI, Weiss C, Yancopoulos GD, Deutsch U and Risau W: Angiopoietin-1 induces sprouting angiogenesis in vitro. Curr Biol. 8:529–532. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

51 

Papapetropoulos A, García-Cardeña G, Dengler TJ, Maisonpierre PC, Yancopoulos GD and Sessa WC: Direct actions of angiopoietin-1 on human endothelium: Evidence for network stabilization, cell survival, and interaction with other angiogenic growth factors. Lab Invest. 79:213–223. 1999.PubMed/NCBI

52 

Saharinen P, Kerkelä K, Ekman N, Marron M, Brindle N, Lee GM, Augustin H, Koh GY and Alitalo K: Multiple angiopoietin recombinant proteins activate the Tie1 receptor tyrosine kinase and promote its interaction with Tie2. J Cell Biol. 169:239–243. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

53 

Kim S, Lee JC, Cho ES and Kwon J: COMP-Ang1 promotes chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation of multipotent mesenchymal stem cells through the Ang1/Tie2 signaling pathway. J Orthop Res. 31:1920–1928. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

54 

Kook SH, Lim SS, Cho ES, Lee YH, Han SK, Lee KY, Kwon J, Hwang JW, Bae CH, Seo YK and Lee JC: COMP-angiopoietin 1 increases proliferation, differentiation, and migration of stem-like cells through Tie-2-mediated activation of p38 MAPK and PI3K/Akt signal transduction pathways. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 455:371–377. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

55 

Kim MS, Lee CS, Hur J, Cho HJ, Jun SI, Kim TY, Lee SW, Suh JW, Park KW, Lee HY, et al: Priming with angiopoietin-1 augments the vasculogenic potential of the peripheral blood stem cells mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor through a novel Tie2/Ets-1 pathway. Circulation. 120:2240–2250. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

May-2018
Volume 15 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Kitajima D, Kasamatsu A, Nakashima D, Miyamoto I, Kimura Y, Endo‑Sakamoto Y, Shiiba M, Tanzawa H and Uzawa K: Evidence for critical role of Tie2/Ang1 interaction in metastatic oral cancer. Oncol Lett 15: 7237-7242, 2018
APA
Kitajima, D., Kasamatsu, A., Nakashima, D., Miyamoto, I., Kimura, Y., Endo‑Sakamoto, Y. ... Uzawa, K. (2018). Evidence for critical role of Tie2/Ang1 interaction in metastatic oral cancer. Oncology Letters, 15, 7237-7242. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8212
MLA
Kitajima, D., Kasamatsu, A., Nakashima, D., Miyamoto, I., Kimura, Y., Endo‑Sakamoto, Y., Shiiba, M., Tanzawa, H., Uzawa, K."Evidence for critical role of Tie2/Ang1 interaction in metastatic oral cancer". Oncology Letters 15.5 (2018): 7237-7242.
Chicago
Kitajima, D., Kasamatsu, A., Nakashima, D., Miyamoto, I., Kimura, Y., Endo‑Sakamoto, Y., Shiiba, M., Tanzawa, H., Uzawa, K."Evidence for critical role of Tie2/Ang1 interaction in metastatic oral cancer". Oncology Letters 15, no. 5 (2018): 7237-7242. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8212