Axillary ultrasound and fine needle aspiration biopsy in the preoperative diagnosis of axillary metastases in early‑stage breast cancer

Hu,Xin; Zhou,Xiao; Yang,Huawei; Wei,Wei; Jiang,Yi; Liu,Jianlun

doi:10.3892/ol.2018.8445

Axillary ultrasound and fine needle aspiration biopsy in the preoperative diagnosis of axillary metastases in early‑stage breast cancer

Authors:
- Xin Hu
- Xiao Zhou
- Huawei Yang
- Wei Wei
- Yi Jiang
- Jianlun Liu
View Affiliations

Affiliations: Department of Breast Surgery, The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530021, P.R. China
Published online on: April 5, 2018 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8445
Pages: 8477-8483
Copyright: © Hu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

Abstract

The efficacy of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) following sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been questioned. The present study was performed to determine the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of axillary ultrasound (US) and fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in the diagnosis of axillary metastases in patients with early breast cancer. A total of 214 patients with stage I and II breast cancer between June 2015 and January 2017 were included. All of the patients received axillary US as a primary investigation for lymph node status. US‑guided FNAB was performed on suspicious lymph nodes. Those with non‑suspicious and FNAB‑negative axillary nodes proceeded to SLNB at the time of primary breast surgery. ALND was performed when the result of the US‑guided FNAB was positive. The results of US and cytology were compared to histopathological results to determine their sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and accuracy. A total of 76 out of 214 patients (35.5%) had axillary lymph node metastases at final histology. The sensitivity and specificity of axillary US alone were 59.2% (45/76) and 78.3% (108/138), respectively. Axillary US with FNAB identified 32 patients with positive lymph node metastases, and increased the sensitivity and specificity to 71.1% (32/45) and 100.0% (30/30). Combined with FNAB, the positive and negative predictive values were 100.0% (32/32) and 69.8% (30/43), respectively. Axillary US‑alone or combined US/FNAB had a high accuracy rate and a satisfactory result as they cost less and it is easy to assess the status of axillary lymph nodes. Thus, axillary US with FNAB may avoid unnecessary SLNB in a significant number of patients.

View Figures

View References

1	Cianfrocca M and Goldstein LJ: Prognostic and predictive factors in early-stage breast cancer. Oncologist. 9:606–616. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
2	Fisher ER, Anderson S, Redmond C and Fisher B: Pathologic findings from the national surgical adjuvant breast project protocol B-06. 10-year pathologic and clinical prognostic discriminants. Cancer. 71:2507–2514. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
3	Swinson C, Ravichandran D, Nayagam M and Allen S: Ultrasound and fine needle aspiration cytology of the axilla in the pre-operative identification of axillary nodal involvement in breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 35:1152–1157. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
4	Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, Beitsch PD, Whitworth PW, Blumencranz PW, Leitch AM, Saha S, McCall LM and Morrow M: Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 305:569–575. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
5	Boland MR, Prichard RS, Daskalova I, Lowery AJ, Evoy D, Geraghty J, Rothwell J, Quinn CM, O'Doherty A and McDermott EW: Axillary nodal burden in primary breast cancer patients with positive pre-operative ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration cytology: Management in the era of ACOSOG Z011. Eur J Surg Oncol. 41:559–565. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
6	Moorman AM, Bourez RL, de Leeuw DM and Kouwenhoven EA: Pre-operative ultrasonographic evaluation of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients: For which group still of additional value and in which group cause for special attention? Ultrasound Med Biol. 41:2842–2848. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
7	Bedi DG, Krishnamurthy R, Krishnamurthy S, Edeiken BS, Le-Petross H, Fornage BD, Bassett RL Jr and Hunt KK: Cortical morphologic features of axillary lymph nodes as a predictor of metastasis in breast cancer: In vitro sonographic study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 191:646–652. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
8	Abe H, Schmidt RA, Kulkarni K, Sennett CA, Mueller JS and Newstead GM: Axillary lymph nodes suspicious for breast cancer metastasis: Sampling with US-guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy-clinical experience in 100 patients. Radiology. 250:41–49. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
9	Boughey JC, Moriarty JP, Degnim AC, Gregg MS, Egginton JS and Long KH: Cost modeling of preoperative axillary ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration to guide surgery for invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 17:953–958. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
10	Pessoa EC, Rodrigues JR, Pessoa CP, Vespoli HM and Uemura G: Axillary lymph node aspiration guided by ultrasound is effective as a method of predicting lymph node involvement in patients with breast cancer? Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 36:118–123. 2014.(In Portuguese). View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
11	Lee MC, Eatrides J, Chau A, Han G, Kiluk JV, Khakpour N, Cox CE, Carter WB and Laronga C: Consequences of axillary ultrasound in patients with T2 or greater invasive breast cancers. Ann Surg Oncol. 18:72–77. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
12	Park SH, Kim MJ, Park BW, Moon HJ, Kwak JY and Kim EK: Impact of preoperative ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration of axillary lymph nodes on surgical management of primary breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 18:738–744. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
13	Baruah BP, Goyal A, Young P, Douglas-Jones AG and Mansel RE: Axillary node staging by ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology in patients with breast cancer. Br J Surg. 97:680–683. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
14	van Roozendaal LM, Vane MLG, van Dalen T, van der Hage JA, Strobbe LJA, Boersma LJ, Linn SC, Lobbes MBI, Poortmans PMP, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, et al: Clinically node negative breast cancer patients undergoing breast conserving therapy, sentinel lymph node procedure versus follow-up: A Dutch randomized controlled multicentre trial (BOOG 2013–08). BMC Cancer. 17:4592017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
15	Cyr AE, Tucker N, Ademuyiwa F, Margenthaler JA, Aft RL, Eberlein TJ, Appleton CM, Zoberi I, Thomas MA, Gao F and Gillanders WE: Successful completion of the pilot phase of a randomized controlled trial comparing sentinel lymph node biopsy to no further axillary staging in patients with clinical T1-T2 N0 breast cancer and normal axillary ultrasound. J Am Coll Surg. 223:399–407. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
16	Gentilini O and Veronesi U: Abandoning sentinel lymph node biopsy in early breast cancer? A new trial in progress at the European Institute of Oncology of Milan (SOUND: Sentinel node vs. observation after axillary ultrasound. Breast. 21:678–681. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
17	Nenutil R: A revolution postponed indefinitely. WHO classification of tumors of the breast 2012: The main changes compared to the 3rd edition (2003). Cesk Patol. 51:23–25. 2015.PubMed/NCBI
18	Murray AD, Staff RT, Redpath TW, Gilbert FJ, Ah-See AK, Brookes JA, Miller ID and Payne S: Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the axilla in women with breast cancer: Comparison with pathology of excised nodes. Br J Radiol. 75:220–228. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
19	Bonnema J, van Geel AN, van Ooijen B, Mali SP, Tjiam SL, Henzen-Logmans SC, Schmitz PI and Wiggers T: Ultrasound-guided aspiration biopsy for detection of nonpalpable axillary node metastases in breast cancer patients: New diagnostic method. World J Surg. 21:270–274. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
20	Oruwari JU, Chung MA, Koelliker S, Steinhoff MM and Cady B: Axillary staging using ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in locally advanced breast cancer. Am J Surg. 184:307–309. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
21	Chang MC, Crystal P and Colgan TJ: The evolving role of axillary lymph node fine-needle aspiration in the management of carcinoma of the breast. Cancer Cytopathol. 119:328–334. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
22	Kuenen-Boumeester V, Menke-Pluymers M, de Kanter AY, Obdeijn IM, Urich D and Van Der Kwast TH: Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients. A preoperative staging procedure. Eur J Cancer. 39:170–174. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
23	Ciatto S, Brancato B, Risso G, Ambrogetti D, Bulgaresi P, Maddau C, Turco P and Houssami N: Accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of axillary lymph nodes as a triage test in breast cancer staging. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 103:85–91. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
24	Krishnamurthy S, Sneige N, Bedi DG, Edieken BS, Fornage BD, Kuerer HM, Singletary SE and Hunt KK: Role of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of indeterminate and suspicious axillary lymph nodes in the initial staging of breast carcinoma. Cancer. 95:982–988. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
25	Davis JT, Brill YM, Simmons S, Sachleben BC, Cibull ML, McGrath P, Wright H, Romond E, Hester M, Moore A and Samayoa LM: Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of clinically negative lymph nodes vs. sentinel node mapping in patients at high risk for axillary metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol. 13:1545–1552. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
26	Leenders MW, Broeders M, Croese C, Richir MC, Go HL, Langenhorst BL, Meijer S and Schreurs WH: Ultrasound and fine needle aspiration cytology of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer. To do or not to do? Breast. 21:578–583. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
27	García Fernández A, Fraile M, Giménez N, Reñe A, Torras M, Canales L, Torres J, Barco I, González S, Veloso E, et al: Use of axillary ultrasound, ultrasound-fine needle aspiration biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative triage of breast cancer patients considered for sentinel node biopsy. Ultrasound Med Biol. 37:16–22. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
28	Popli MB, Sahoo M, Mehrotra N, Choudhury M, Kumar A, Pathania OP and Thomas S: Preoperative ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology for axillary staging in breast carcinoma. Australas Radiol. 50:122–126. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
29	Tahir M, Osman KA, Shabbir J, Rogers C, Suarez R, Reynolds T and Bucknall T: Preoperative axillary staging in breast cancer-saving time and resources. Breast J. 14:369–371. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
30	Deurloo EE, Tanis PJ, Gilhuijs KG, Muller SH, Kröger R, Peterse JL, Rutgers EJ, Olmos Valdés R and Kool Schultze LJ: Reduction in the number of sentinel lymph node procedures by preoperative ultrasonography of the axilla in breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 39:1068–1073. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
31	Gilissen F, Oostenbroek R, Storm R, Westenend P and Plaisier P: Prevention of futile sentinel node procedures in breast cancer: Ultrasonography of the axilla and fine-needle aspiration cytology are obligatory. Eur J Surg Oncol. 34:497–500. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
32	MacNeill M, Arnott I and Thomas J: Fine needle aspiration cytology is a valuable adjunct to axillary ultrasound in the preoperative staging of breast cancer. J Clin Pathol. 64:42–46. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
33	van Rijk MC, Deurloo EE, Nieweg OE, Gilhuijs KG, Peterse JL, Rutgers EJ, Kröger R and Kroon BB: Ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology can spare breast cancer patients unnecessary sentinel lymph node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol. 13:31–35. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
34	Mainiero MB: Regional lymph node staging in breast cancer: The increasing role of imaging and ultrasound-guided axillary lymph node fine needle aspiration. Radiol Clin North Am. 48:989–997. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
35	Sapino A, Cassoni P, Zanon E, Fraire F, Croce S, Coluccia C, Donadio M and Bussolati G: Ultrasonographically-guided fine-needle aspiration of axillary lymph nodes: Role in breast cancer management. Br J Cancer. 88:702–706. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
36	Abe H, Schmidt RA, Sennett CA, Shimauchi A and Newstead GM: US-guided core needle biopsy of axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer: Why and how to do it. Radiographics. 27 Suppl 1:S91–S99. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
37	Koelliker SL, Chung MA, Mainiero MB, Steinhoff MM and Cady B: Axillary lymph nodes: US-guided fine-needle aspiration for initial staging of breast cancer-correlation with primary tumor size. Radiology. 246:81–89. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
38	Pigott J, Nichols R, Maddox WA and Balch CM: Metastases to the upper levels of the axillary nodes in carcinoma of the breast and its implications for nodal sampling procedures. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 158:255–259. 1984.PubMed/NCBI