Apatinib suppresses cell growth and metastasis and promotes antitumor activity of temozolomide in glioma

Introduction

Malignant glioma is the most common type of primary central nervous system tumor, accounting for 80% all brain and central nervous system tumors (1,2). Although major advancements have been made in surgical treatment, postoperative chemotherapy, and radiation, the prognosis for patients with malignant gliomas remains poor, with an average survival of roughly 1 year after diagnosis (3). According to Chinese glioma genome atlas (CGGA) statistics, the overall survival (OS) time for glioblastoma [GBM, World Health Organization (WHO) grade IV] patients is only 14.4 months, while the 6-month, 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates were 87, 61, 15 and 9%, respectively (4). The aggressiveness of glioma arises from the proliferation and invasion capabilities of malignant glioma cells (5). Thus, controlling these characteristics is a potential therapeutic strategy for glioma treatment.

Temozolomide (TMZ) is a prodrug that forms O6-methylguanine (O6-MeG) adducts, causing cytotoxicity via mismatch with deoxythymidine residues, inducing apoptosis following processing by the mismatch repair system (6). TMZ is converted to its active compound 3-methyl-(triazen-1-yl) imidazole-4-carboxamide at a physiological pH (7). The activated form of TMZ readily crosses the blood-brain barrier, and is, therefore, commonly used for the treatment of primary and secondary intracranial neoplasms (7). Despite the clinical success of TMZ, a large number of patients respond poorly to this agent, at least in part due to intrinsic resistance of tumor cells to damage-induced cell death (8,9). Therefore, the identification of a novel combined strategy for glioma treatment is required.

Gliomas are highly vascular and rich in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which promotes angiogenesis. Therefore, the anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody, bevacizumab, and anti-VEGF receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), including sunitinib and sorafenib, have been used for treatment of patients with glioma (10). Apatinib is an orally administered second-generation inhibitor of the phosphorylation of the tyrosine residues within the intracellular domain of VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2) (11). Apatinib prevents VEGF-induced phosphorylation of VEGFR2 and the subsequent downstream signaling responsible for the biological effects of VEGF (12,13). Preclinical studies have demonstrated that apatinib exhibits antitumor activity in patients with different types of malignant tumors (14,15). In the present study, it was investigated whether apatinib has therapeutic potential in glioma. The inhibitory activity of apatinib on cell proliferation and invasion was investigated in vitro using the cell counting kit-8 assay, colony formation assay, Matrigel-based invasion assay and wound-healing assay. The potential of the combination of apatinib with TMZ for glioma therapy was also studied.

Materials and methods

Cell culture and treatment

The U251MG and U-87MG ATCC cell lines were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) with nutrient mixture: F12 (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), without antibiotics. U-87MG ATCC cells were of CNS origin and are likely to be a bonafide human glioblastoma cell line considering their mRNA expression profile. Thus, U-87MG ATCC cells can be used in glioma research and are distinct from U87 Uppsala cells established in 1968 at the University of Uppsala (16). Cells were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Apatinib (cat. no. S2221) and TMZ (cat. no. S1237) were purchased from Selleck Chemicals (Houston, Texas, USA) and used to treat U251MG and U-87MG ATCC cells. A stock solution was prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide at 10 mM and was stored at −20°C.

Western blot analysis

Cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS and lysed in ice-cold RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, China) containing a protease/phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). The protein concentration was determined by BCA assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Cell lysates were separated by 6 or 10% SDS-PAGE [6% for VEGFR2, phospho- (p-)VEGFR2 and 10% for Akt, p-Akt, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (Erk), p-Erk and GAPDH] and transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). After blocking with 5% non-fat milk in Tris-buffered saline with Tween (TBST), the blots were incubated with the following primary antibodies: P-VEGFR2 (dilution, 1:600; cat. no. 2478), VEGFR2 (dilution, 1:1,000; cat. no. 9658), Akt (dilution, 1:1,000; cat. no. 4691), p-Akt (dilution, 1:1,000; cat. no. 4060), ERK (dilution, 1:1,000; cat. no. 4695), p-ERK (dilution, 1:1,000; cat. no. 4370) and GAPDH (dilution, 1:5,000, cat. no. 2118; all Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers MA, USA) at 4°C for overnight. Next, the membraned were incubated with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse or rabbit secondary IgG antibody (cat. nos. ZDR5305 and ZDR5307; 1:10,000; OriGene Technologies, Inc., Beijing, China) at 37°C for 1 h. Immunoreactive bands were visualized with a Immobilon ECL chemiluminescent reagent (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). The band densities were quantified using ImagePro Plus (version 6.0; Media Cybernetics, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA).

Cell viability assay

U251MG and U-87MG ATCC cells were plated in 96-well plates at 1×103 cells/well), following treatment with 0, 5, 10 or 20 µM apatinib, and 20 µM TMZ as a previous study indicated (17) treatment for 48 h, the viability was determined using Cell Counting Kit-8 (Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Inc., Kumamoto, Japan). The absorbance was measured at 450 nm and relative cell viability was calculated.

Colony formation assay

A 0.2-ml layer of 0.5% low-melt agarose was diluted in complete growth medium (DMEM medium with 10% FBS, Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and plated in 6-well plates. A total of 1×103 U251MG or U-87MG ATCC cells were per well, with was DMEM medium containing 10% FBS. Following 10 µM apatinib and 20 µM TMZ treatment for 12 days, the plate was fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with 10% crystal violet (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) at room temperature (from 22 to 25°C) for 15 mins. Visible plots were defined as a colony and the number of colonies in 3 separate wells were counted subsequent to scanned by light stereo microscope (magnification, ×4).

Apoptosis detection assay

U251MG and U-87MG ATCC cells were plated in a 6-well plate at 4×105 cells/well. Following 10 µM apatinib and 20 µM TMZ treatment for 48 h, the cells were harvested and stained using a Annexin V-FITC/PI Apoptosis Detection kit (Nanjing KeyGen Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China), according to the manufacturer's protocol. A flow cytometer (Acea Biosciences Inc., Zhejiang, China) was used to identify apoptotic cells and the apoptotic cells were analyzed using De Novo Software (version 1.2.4; Acea Biosciences Inc.).

Cell invasion assay

In vitro analysis of invasion was assessed using Matrigel (BD Biosciences, Frankling Lakes, NJ, USA) and 8-µm Transwell inserts (BD Biosciences). The cell invasion assay was performed as previously described (18). Briefly, 50 µl Matrigel (diluted 1:5 with serum-free DMEM) was plated onto the Transwell insert. Then a cell suspension of 5×103 U251MG or U-87MG ATCC cells was added. Treatments of 10 µM apatinib and 20 µM TMZ were made for 24 h at 37°C. The invasive cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) and stained with 10% crystal violet (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) at room temperature (from 22 to 25°C) for 15 mins. The invasive cells were photographed by light microscopy (DTX500; Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) with a magnification of ×40 and the cells in three random fields of view were counted.

Wound-healing assay

U251MG and U-87MG ATCC cells were grown to 90% confluency in 6-well plates. A wound was made by dragging a plastic pipette tip across the cell surface. Phase contrast images of the wounds were taken at 0 and 48 h of treatment with 10 µM apatinib and 20 µM TMZ. Image J software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used to evaluate the migration rate of U251MG and U-87MG ATCC cells.

Statistical analysis

All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviations. All experiments were performed ≥3 times independently. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 19.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Student t-tests were performed to compare differences between 2 groups. One-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's test was used for multiple comparisons analysis. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Apatinib suppresses activation of VEGFR2 in glioma cells

To determine the potential role of apatinib in glioma-cell proliferation, p53- and EGFR-mutated (U251MG) and wild-type (U-87MG ATCC) cells were treated with 0, 5, 10 and 20 µM apatinib. Western blotting was performed to detect p-VEGFR2 and VEGFR2 protein expression. Apatinib significantly inhibited p-VEGFR2 protein expression in a concentration-dependent manner in U251MG and U-87MG ATCC cells (Fig. 1A). It was also suggested that the activation of downstream targets of VEGFR2 signaling pathway (Akt and ERK) was also inhibited by apatinib in glioma cells (Fig. 1B). These results confirm an inhibition role of apatinib in VEGFR2-activation in glioma cells.

Figure 1. Apatinib suppresses VEGFR2 activation in glioma. (A) Western blotting analysis of p-VEGFR2 and VEGFR2 expression in U251MG and U-87MG ATCC cells following treatment with 0, 5, 10 and 20 µM apatinib for 48 h. (B) Western blotting of p-Akt, Akt, p-ERK and ERK expression in U251MG and U-87MG ATCC cells following treatment with and without 10 µM apatinib for 48 h. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, compared with 0 µM apatinib. P-, phosphorylated; VEGFR2, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase.

Apatinib suppresses cell proliferation in glioma

To analyze the antitumor activity of apatinib in glioma, a CCK-8 assay was performed to determine the cell viability of U251MG and U-87MG ATCC cells following apatinib treatment at 0, 5, 10 and 20 µM for 48 h. Apatinib efficiently impaired U251MG and U-87MG ATCC cell proliferation at concentrations of 10 and 20 µM, an effect which was concentration-dependent (Fig. 1A and B). The IC50 of apatinib was ~13 µM in U-87MG ATCC and U251MG cells. Therefore, a concentration of 10 µM which was lower than IC50 of apatinib was used for colony formation and apoptosis detection assays. Inhibition of colony formation of U251MG and U-87MG ATCC cells was also identified following apatinib treatment (P<0.01; Fig. 2C and D). To determine the mechanism underlying apatinib-mediated inhibition of glioma-cell proliferation, flow cytometry was performed to investigate U251MG and U-87MG ATCC-cell apoptosis with or without apatinib. The results revealed an increased rate of apoptosis both in U251MG and U-87MG ATCC cells treated with apatinib compared with untreated cells (P<0.01; Fig. 2E and F). These results suggest that apatinib inhibits glioma-cell proliferation and colony formation through induction of apoptosis.

Figure 2. Apatinib suppresses proliferation of glioma cells. The cell viability of (A) U251MG cells, and (B) U-87MG ATCC cells was determined following treatment with 0, 5, 10 and 20 µM apatinib, relative to that of untreated cells. n=5 for each group. Colony formation assays were performed in (C) U251MG cells, and (D) U-87MG ATCC cells following treatment with 0 and 10 µM apatinib. The number of colonies was counted and analyzed. n=3 for each group. **P<0.01 vs. 0 µM apatinib. Analysis of cell apoptosis by Annexin-V/PI staining in (E) U251MG cells, and (F) U-87MG ATCC cells following treatment with 0 and 10 µM apatinib. n=3 for each group. **P<0.01 vs. 0 µM apatinib. PI, proprium iodide.

Apatinib suppresses cell invasion in glioma

Invasion and wound-healing assays were performed to investigate the invasion and migration abilities of U251MG and U-87MG ATCC cells upon apatinib treatment. As demonstrated in Fig. 3A and B, apatinib-treated U251MG and U-87MG ATCC cells were less invasive than untreated cells (P<0.01; Fig. 3A and B). Furthermore, apatinib significantly inhibited the migratory ability of U251MG and U-87MG ATCC cells compared with control (P<0.01; Fig. 3C and D). Collectively, these results demonstrate the inhibitory role of apatinib on cell invasion in glioma.

Figure 3. Apatinib suppresses glioma-cell migration. Invasion assays were performed to determine the invasive abilities of (A) U251MG cells, and (B) U-87MG ATCC cells following treatment with 0 and 10 µM apatinib. The number of invasive cells in per frame was counted and analyzed. n=3 for each group. Scale bar=50 µm. Wound-healing assays were performed to determine the migration ability of (C) U251MG, and (D) U-87MG ATCC cells following treatment with 0 and 10 µM apatinib. The migration rate was analyzed by Image G software. n=3 for each group. Scale bar=100 µm. **P<0.01, vs. 0 µM apatinib.

Apatinib promotes TMZ-mediated inhibition of proliferation in glioma

Based on the above results, it was investigated whether apatinib enhances TMZ-mediated inhibition of proliferation of glioma cells. The cell viability of U-87MG ATCC cells after treatment with apatinib with or without TMZ was determined by CCK-8 assay. TMZ was used at a concentration of 20 µM according to a previous study by Nitta et al (17). Apatinib or TMZ treatments alone efficiently inhibited proliferation of glioma cells, compared with untreated cells (P<0.01; Fig. 4A). However, in combination, apatinib significantly enhanced TMZ-mediated inhibition of proliferation of U-87MG ATCC cells, compared with cells treated with TMZ alone (P<0.01; Fig. 4A). Similar results were found in U251 cells (data not shown). A colony formation assay also demonstrated the enhancing role of apatinib on TMZ-mediated antitumor activity (P<0.01, compared with cells treated with TMZ alone; Fig. 4B). An increased proportion of apoptotic U-87MG ATCC cells was also demonstrated in the group treated with apatinib and TMZ compared with U-87MG ATCC cells treated with TMZ alone (P<0.01; Fig. 4C). Collectively, these results indicate that apatinib significantly improved the antitumor activity of TMZ in glioma.

Figure 4. Apatinib enhances TMZ-mediated cell growth inhibition. (A) Viability of U-87MG ATCC cells was measured following treatment with 0 and 10 µM apatinib and 0 and 20 µM TMZ for 48 h, relative to untreated cells. n=3 for each group. (B) Colony formation assays were performed on U-87MG ATCC cells treated with 0 and 10 µM apatinib and 0 and 20 µM TMZ. The number of colonies was counted and analyzed. n=3 for each group. (C) The proportion of apoptotic cells, analyzed by Annexin-V/PI staining in U-87MG ATCC cells treated with 0 and 10 µM apatinib and 0 and 20 µM TMZ. n=3 for each group. **P<0.01, vs. untreated group. ##P<0.01, vs. TMZ-treated group. TMZ, temozolomide; PI, proprium iodide.

Apatinib improves TMZ-mediated inhibition of cell invasion in glioma

It was also investigated whether apatinib enhances TMZ-mediated inhibition invasion of glioma cells. As demonstrated Fig. 5A, a reduced number of invasive U-87MG ATCC cells were counted in the groups treated with apatinib and TMZ compared with control cells (P<0.01; Fig. 5A and B). Collectively, these results indicate that apatinib significantly enhanced the antitumor activity of TMZ in glioma cancer cells.

Figure 5. Apatinib enhances TMZ-mediated inhibition of cell invasion. (A) Matrigel-based invasion assays were performed to determine the invasive ability of U-87MG ATCC cells treated with 0 and 10 µM apatinib and 0 and 20 µM TMZ. Scale bar, 50 µm. (B) The number of invasive cells per frame was counted and analyzed. n=3 for each group. **P<0.01, vs. untreated cells; ##P<0.01, vs. TMZ-treated cells. TMZ, temozolomide.

Discussion

Seeing as glioma is hypervascular in nature, sunitinib and sorafenib have been used to control abnormal vasculature in clinical trials (https://clinicaltrials.gov) (10). However, internal resistance restricts the use of first-generation inhibitors of the VEGF-VEGFR pathway (19). Previous clinical studies have indicated the efficiency of apatinib treatment in recurrent glioma and that apatinib can transcend the brain-blood barrier (11,20). However, its mechanism of action remained unclear. In the present study, antitumor activity was observed in apatinib-treated glioma cells (significant inhibition of cell proliferation and invasion). Apatinib was also demonstrated to improve the antitumor activity of TMZ in glioma cells. All experiments were performed using two glioma cell lines, which differ in mutation status. Collectively, the present study suggests that apatinib may provide a novel therapeutic strategy for glioma, particularly in combination with TMZ.

VEGFR2 is expressed in endothelial cells and upregulated in tumor vasculature (21). Phosphorylation of VEGFR2 by autocrine or paracrine VEGF has been demonstrated to activate the ERK, Akt, FAK, and MAPK pathways, which regulate cell proliferation and migration (21). Seeing as VEGFR2 is highly expressed in glioma cells (22), it is hypothesized that it serves a critical role in invasion and proliferation. The VEGFR2 pathway tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), sunitinib and sorafenib, have been previously used to treat patients with glioma (11). In the present study, it was demonstrated that VEGFR2 is highly expressed in glioma cells, and apatinib was revealed to inhibit p-VEGFR2, p-Akt and p-ERK protein expression in U251MG and U-87MG ATCC cells in a concentration-dependent manner. Apatinib also significantly inhibited glioma cell proliferation and colony formation, and induced cell apoptosis in p53- and EGFR-mutated U251MG and wild-type U-87MG ATCC cells. Furthermore, inhibition of glioma-cell invasion and migration of glioma cells was observed in apatinib-treated glioma cells. These results provide evidence of the antitumor activity of apatinib in glioma cells. However, further in vivo studies are required to confirm this antitumor activity of apatinib.

Acquired resistance to temozolomide remains a limitation in the treatment of glioblastoma; approximately 90% recurrent glioblastoma cases are resistant to additional TMZ therapy (23). Type-selective endothelin receptor antagonists combined with chemotherapy have been investigated as a therapeutic strategy to improve clinical outcomes for patients with glioma (24). Macitentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist, combined with temozolomide treatment is well-tolerated, produces a durable response, and warrants clinical evaluation in glioblastoma (25). Treatment of glioblastoma cells with ER stress-inducing drugs has been demonstrated to induce drug-sensitization of glioma cells to TMZ through downregulation of O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase, N-methylpurine DNA glycosylase and Rad51 recombinase (26). The present study suggests that the addition of apatinib to TMZ may enhance the effect of chemotherapy. Treatment of glioma cells with apatinib or TMZ alone resulted increased apoptosis and decreased proliferation and invasion compared with untreated cells. Notably, the combination of apatinib and TMZ resulted in enhanced inhibition of cell proliferation and invasion compared with TMZ treatment alone. These findings demonstrated a synergistic antitumor effect of apatinib and TMZ in glioma cells and may explain the clinical benefits observed following combination treatment of recurrent glioma (24). Further in vivo studies are required to demonstrate the synergistic antitumor effect of apatinib and TMZ in glioma.

Previous studies have demonstrated enhanced activation of Akt and ERK in TMZ-resistant glioma cells (27,28). Overexpression of Akt suppressed the enhanced cytotoxic effect of TMZ mediated by SRC-silencing (29). Treatment with the estrogen receptor-β agonist (liquiritigenin) was demonstrated to enhance TMZ-sensitivity of glioma cells by inhibiting PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway (30). TGF-β1-dependent activation of SMAD/ERK signaling is involved in connective tissue growth factor-mediated TMZ-resistance in glioma (31). Targeting of the MEK-ERK-MDM2-p53 signaling pathway in combination with TMZ has been suggested to be a novel and promising therapeutic strategy in the treatment of glioblastoma (32). In the present study, inhibition of Akt/ERK activation by apatinib was demonstrated in glioma cells, which may contribute to the synergistic antitumor effect of apatinib and TMZ in glioma.

In summary, apatinib demonstrated efficient antitumor activity and enhanced the effect of TMZ in glioma cells, which was associated with decreased cell proliferation, colony formation, invasion and migration, and increased cell apoptosis. This antitumor activity of apatinib was observed in p53- and EGFR-mutated cells, as well as wild-type cells. These results provide a basis for the clinical use of apatinib in glioma treatment. Further in vivo studies are required to characterize the clinical antitumor activity of apatinib in glioma.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The present study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81602186) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (grant no. 2017M612216).

Availability of data and materials

All of the datasets generated/analyzed in the present study are included in the published manuscript.

Authors' contributions

CW, MJ, XZ, HH, QL and ZY contributed to data acquisition, the analysis and interpretation of data, were involved in drafting and writing the manuscript, revising it critically for important intellectual content and gave the final approval of the version to be published. ZY and XZ were accountable for design of this study and all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References